Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ... Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

site.icomp.org.my
from site.icomp.org.my More from this publisher
30.07.2015 Views

FigureFigure5Percentage change ong>inong> contraceptive method mix over time1991610 3 11117PillIUDInjectionCondom121420071788PillIUDInjectionCondom2330Female sterilizationRhythmWithdrawal2823Female sterilizationRhythmWithdrawalOong>theong>rOong>theong>rOverall, ong>theong> trends ong>inong> choice of method ong>inong>dicate thata quarter of women use traditional methods of familyplannong>inong>g ong>andong> anoong>theong>r quarter use condoms, meanong>inong>g thathalf are usong>inong>g couple-methods of family plannong>inong>g. Theoong>theong>r half use female methods, with about a quarter ofong>theong>se choosong>inong>g permanent methods ong>andong> ong>theong> remaong>inong>ong>inong>gquarter usong>inong>g oong>theong>r modern female methods.Source of methodsIn 1991, when fertility declong>inong>e had just come ong>inong>to playong>andong> contraceptive prevalence was at a low 11 per cent, ong>theong>government was ong>theong> major supplier of modern contraceptivemethods: 56 per cent of users received ong>theong>ir method froma government supplier (ong>inong>cludong>inong>g government hospitals,doctors, clong>inong>ics, family welfare centres etc.), while only30 per cent received methods from ong>theong> private sector (seeTable 2). By 2007, while ong>theong> government remaong>inong>ed ong>theong>supplier for almost half of all contraceptive users, at 48 percent, ong>theong> share of ong>theong> private sector ong>inong>creased by more than10 percentage poong>inong>ts to 41 per cent, ong>inong>dicatong>inong>g that moreong>andong> more users were payong>inong>g for contraception.In lookong>inong>g at source of method by specific method type, twotrends stong>andong> out. Over ong>theong> 16-year period, ong>theong> government’sshare ong>inong> ong>theong> supply of ong>theong> pill ong>inong>creased ong>andong> it replaced ong>theong>private sector to become ong>theong> biggest supplier. On ong>theong> oong>theong>rhong>andong>, IUDs, which ong>inong> 1991 were supplied primarily byong>theong> government (81%), were now beong>inong>g provided equallyby ong>theong> private sector as well. Among ong>theong> oong>theong>r methods,ong>theong> private sector saw slight ong>inong>creases (correspondong>inong>g to aslight decrease ong>inong> ong>theong> government’s share) ong>inong> ong>theong> share ofong>inong>jectables ong>andong> female sterilization, while both ong>theong> publicong>andong> private sectors saw ong>inong>creases ong>inong> ong>theong> market share ofcondoms. Withong>inong> ong>theong> private sector, ong>theong> supply of condomsby non-medical stores was responsible for ong>theong> ong>inong>crease ong>inong>market share.Induced abortionsDespite ong>theong> fact that ong>inong>duced abortions are illegal ong>inong>Pakistan, except when performed to save women's lives,a study carried out by ong>theong> Population ong>Councilong> estimatedthat 890,000 ong>inong>duced abortions were performed ong>inong> 2002,ong>andong> ong>theong> abortion rate was 29 per 1,000 women aged15-49 (Population ong>Councilong>, 2004). This was a mediumestimate; ong>theong> low ong>andong> high estimates were 25 ong>andong> 31 per1,000, respectively. The abortion rate of 29 is most likelyan underestimate of ong>theong> true abortion rate despite beong>inong>gmoderately high by global stong>andong>ards. The majority ofsuch abortions are takong>inong>g place among married womenwith more than three children. Studies based on ong>theong>sedata also found that a considerable proportion of womenwho ong>inong>duced abortions had tried some method ofcontraception ong>andong> some even reported that ong>theong>y had beenusong>inong>g contraceptives, albeit ong>inong>effectively, when ong>theong>y becamepregnant (Arif ong>andong> Kamran, 2007).Sathar et al. (2007) estimated measures of total pregnancyong>andong> unwanted pregnancy to portray ong>theong> broader contextwithong>inong> which ong>inong>duced abortion was occurrong>inong>g ong>andong> tomeasure both ong>theong> absolute level of unwanted pregnancyong>andong> ong>theong> probability that women who experienced anunwanted pregnancy would seek an abortion. Resultsyielded an unwanted pregnancy rate of 77 per 1,000women, which accounted for almost two fifths of allpregnancies. Abortions accounted for almost two fifths ofong>theong>se unwanted pregnancies.Unmet needDespite ong>theong> low use of fertility regulation, more ong>andong> morewomen ong>inong> Pakistan are expressong>inong>g ong>theong> desire to limit orpostpone childbearong>inong>g. In 1991, 40 per cent of ong>theong> women208

TableTable1Source of modern method over timeSourcePill IUD Injection CondomFemalesterilizationAll modernmethods1991 2007 1991 2007 1991 2007 1991 2007 1991 2007 1991 2007Government 34.9 46.1 81.1 52.4 53.0 51.2 11.7 16.9 85.1 72.4 55.7 48.2Private 56.2 39.6 15.8 47.6 42.0 44.6 47.6 58.0 13.7 25.8 30.0 41.4Medical 49.7 31.2 11.3 41.0 42.0 41.7 33.2 27.3 13.7 25.8 25.5 30.1Oong>theong>r shop 6.5 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 13.1 30.5 na na 4.4 10.3Traong>inong>ed birthattendant0.0 1.2 4.5 6.6 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.2 na na 1.0 1.0Oong>theong>r 5.2 5.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 1.3 11.5 0.8 na na 4.3 0.9Note: na = not applicable.surveyed wanted no more children; this figure ong>inong>creased to52 per cent ong>inong> 2007. Regional differences ong>inong> ong>theong> desire tolimit childbearong>inong>g have been decreasong>inong>g steadily over timesong>inong>ce more ong>andong> more rural women want to have no morechildren. These trends ong>inong>dicate that ong>theong>re is ong>inong>creasong>inong>gdemong>andong> for family plannong>inong>g among Pakistani women,particularly ong>inong> rural areas. However, although more than50 per cent of women wish to limit childbearong>inong>g ong>andong> about20 per cent wish to space ong>theong>ir next birth, only 30 per centare usong>inong>g contraception (National Institute of PopulationStudies ong>andong> Macro ong>Internationalong> Inc., 2008), supportong>inong>g ahigh rate of unmet need for Pakistani women.Unmet need – ong>theong> percentage of currently married womenwho are fecund ong>andong> do not want to be pregnant yet arenot usong>inong>g contraceptionong>inong>creased from 33 per cent(National Institute of Population Studies, 2001) to 37per cent ong>inong> ong>theong> 2006/07 DHS. Unmet need ong>inong> rural areas,which was ong>inong>itially lower, now exceeds urban unmet need,suggestong>inong>g that ong>theong> availability ong>andong> affordability of familyplannong>inong>g services is an obstacle ong>andong> limitation to fertilitychange, a situation which applies more so ong>inong> rural Pakistan.In long>inong>e with ong>theong>se fong>inong>dong>inong>gs is ong>theong> trend ong>inong> unplannedchildbearong>inong>g (ong>theong> combong>inong>ation of unwanted births ong>andong>mistimed births): ong>theong> proportion of recent births thatare unplanned rose from 21 per cent ong>inong> 1990/91 to 24per cent ong>inong> 2006/07. Unmet need for contraception ong>andong>ong>theong> proportion of births that are unplanned ong>andong> ong>theong> highrate of abortion suggest that a large fraction of currentlymarried women ong>inong> Pakistan are at risk of an unwantedpregnancy ong>andong> potentially an unsafe abortion.Vulnerable group – poor womenFertility rates ong>inong> Pakistan vary by women’s education ong>andong>household wealth status. These ong>inong>equalities can also beseen ong>inong> ong>theong> unmet need for family plannong>inong>g. However,unlike total fertility, ong>theong> relationship of unmet need withong>theong>se background characteristics has changed over time. In1991, women from ong>theong> poorest households had ong>theong> lowestunmet need; over time unmet need among ong>theong>se womenrose substantially, ong>andong> ong>theong>y now have ong>theong> highest unmetneed (World Bank, 2009). The change ong>inong> ong>theong> relationshipbetween unmet need ong>andong> wealth can be understoodby lookong>inong>g at ong>theong> changes ong>inong> ong>theong> relationship betweenpreferences ong>andong> contraception ong>andong> wealth (see Figure 7).The ong>inong>dividual graphs ong>inong> Figure 7 show that ong>theong> demong>andong>for family plannong>inong>g, as represented by ong>theong> percentage ofwomen wantong>inong>g no more children, rose more dramaticallyfor women from ong>theong> poorest quong>inong>tile. In fact, ong>theong> figure thatshows ong>theong> proportion wantong>inong>g to limit childbearong>inong>g hasalmost converged at a level of about 50 per cent or morefor all wealth quong>inong>tiles unlike ong>theong> earlier period where itshowed a sharp positive association with wealth. This isong>inong> stark contrast to differentials ong>inong> contraceptive use thatappear to be almost as sharp across rich ong>andong> poor womenas ong>theong>y were ong>inong> ong>theong> earlier period. Current use differentials(ong>inong> absolute terms) between ong>theong> poorest ong>andong> richest womenwere 34 per cent ong>inong> ong>theong> earlier period ong>andong> 32 per cent ong>inong>2007, ong>inong>dicatong>inong>g a negligible levellong>inong>g of contraceptive use,unlike ong>theong> dramatic levellong>inong>g seen ong>inong> fertility preferences.Ultimately, this explaong>inong>s ong>theong> sharp ong>inong>crease ong>inong> unmet need,a combong>inong>ed outcome of preferences ong>andong> use, experiencedby poor women who ong>inong>creased ong>theong>ir demong>andong> to limitchildbearong>inong>g without much change ong>inong> contraception use.This is ong>inong> contrast to ong>theong> sharp fall ong>inong> unmet need of ong>theong>rich women who ong>inong>creased ong>theong>ir contraceptive use ong>inong>conjunction with ong>theong>ir demong>andong> for it. The situation ofrelatively richer ong>andong> poorer women has changed ong>inong> ong>theong>selast two decades: ong>theong> differential of unmet need by wealthis significant – practically non-existent for ong>theong> rich ong>andong>over 30 per cent for poor women (World Bank, 2009).209

FigureFigure5Percentage change <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive method mix over time1991610 3 11117PillIUDInjecti<strong>on</strong>C<strong>on</strong>dom121420071788PillIUDInjecti<strong>on</strong>C<strong>on</strong>dom2330Female sterilizati<strong>on</strong>RhythmWithdrawal2823Female sterilizati<strong>on</strong>RhythmWithdrawalO<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rO<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rOverall, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> choice of method <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate thata quarter of women use traditi<strong>on</strong>al methods of familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r quarter use c<strong>on</strong>doms, mean<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g thathalf are us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g couple-methods of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Theo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r half use female methods, with about a quarter of<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se choos<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g permanent methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gquarter us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r modern female methods.Source of methodsIn 1991, when fertility decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e had just come <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to play<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalence was at a low 11 per cent, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>government was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> major supplier of modern c<strong>on</strong>traceptivemethods: 56 per cent of users received <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir method froma government supplier (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g government hospitals,doctors, cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ics, family welfare centres etc.), while <strong>on</strong>ly30 per cent received methods from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector (seeTable 2). By 2007, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>supplier for almost half of all c<strong>on</strong>traceptive users, at 48 percent, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> share of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased by more than10 percentage po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ts to 41 per cent, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that more<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> more users were pay<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>.In look<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g at source of method by specific method type, twotrends st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> out. Over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 16-year period, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government’sshare <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supply of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pill <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> it replaced <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>private sector to become <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> biggest supplier. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rh<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, IUDs, which <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1991 were supplied primarily by<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government (81%), were now be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g provided equallyby <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector as well. Am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r methods,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector saw slight <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases (corresp<strong>on</strong>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to aslight decrease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government’s share) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> share of<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectables <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> female sterilizati<strong>on</strong>, while both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> public<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sectors saw <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> market share ofc<strong>on</strong>doms. With<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supply of c<strong>on</strong>domsby n<strong>on</strong>-medical stores was resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>market share.Induced aborti<strong>on</strong>sDespite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact that <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>duced aborti<strong>on</strong>s are illegal <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>Pakistan, except when performed to save women's lives,a study carried out by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Council</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimatedthat 890,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>duced aborti<strong>on</strong>s were performed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2002,<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> aborti<strong>on</strong> rate was 29 per 1,000 women aged15-49 (Populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Council</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 2004). This was a mediumestimate; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> high estimates were 25 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 31 per1,000, respectively. The aborti<strong>on</strong> rate of 29 is most likelyan underestimate of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> true aborti<strong>on</strong> rate despite be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gmoderately high by global st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ards. The majority ofsuch aborti<strong>on</strong>s are tak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g place am<strong>on</strong>g married womenwith more than three children. Studies based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sedata also found that a c<strong>on</strong>siderable proporti<strong>on</strong> of womenwho <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>duced aborti<strong>on</strong>s had tried some method ofc<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> some even reported that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y had beenus<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>traceptives, albeit <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>effectively, when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y becamepregnant (Arif <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kamran, 2007).Sathar et al. (2007) estimated measures of total pregnancy<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unwanted pregnancy to portray <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> broader c<strong>on</strong>textwith<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> which <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>duced aborti<strong>on</strong> was occurr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> tomeasure both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> absolute level of unwanted pregnancy<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> probability that women who experienced anunwanted pregnancy would seek an aborti<strong>on</strong>. Resultsyielded an unwanted pregnancy rate of 77 per 1,000women, which accounted for almost two fifths of allpregnancies. Aborti<strong>on</strong>s accounted for almost two fifths of<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se unwanted pregnancies.Unmet needDespite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low use of fertility regulati<strong>on</strong>, more <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> morewomen <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pakistan are express<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> desire to limit orpostp<strong>on</strong>e childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. In 1991, 40 per cent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> women208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!