30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TableTable10<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternati<strong>on</strong>al NGOs. Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> director-generalof FPAN, district committees are located <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly 45districts. Although committees at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> districtlevels have been established, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re reportedly is overlap <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> work between government agencies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> NGOs, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no effective mechanism to follow-up whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>recommendati<strong>on</strong>s forwarded by such committees are met.In additi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>e key stakeholder stated that, ow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>low priority of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepal, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> committeesare not effective because, at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> district level, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> committeefocuses <strong>on</strong> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r reproductive health issues – not <strong>on</strong> familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Issues related to restructur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g or reprioritiz<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme are discussed at<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al sub-committee meet<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs.The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>ference <strong>on</strong>Populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Development,Millennium Development Goals <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>NepalComm<strong>on</strong> goals of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ICPD Programme of Acti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Millennium Development Goals <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clude <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g genderequality, reduc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g poverty, improv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g maternal health<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> afford<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g universal access to reproductive health. IfNepal still has a high unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g,low maternal health-care usage, c<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ued disparities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> age at marriage between men <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> women,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> country is at risk of not meet<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se goals.Target 5b of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MDGs is “Achieve universal access toreproductive health by 2015”. Table 11 below shows <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>four <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicators used to measure progress towards achiev<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gTablethis goal, al<strong>on</strong>g with Nepal’s targets for 2015.Political commitment to familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme<str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is currently a “Priority One” programmefor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government. However key stakeholder <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terviewssuggested that o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r reproductive health programmes, suchas <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Safe Mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rhood <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Safe Aborti<strong>on</strong> programmes,are gett<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g more attenti<strong>on</strong> than family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gto representatives from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> Health Divisi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme is be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g revamped <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rewere plans to create a specific family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g policy <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2011<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> order to accelerate progress towards reach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> targetof 67 per cent CPR by 2015. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> Health Divisi<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Department of Health Services are currentlyrevis<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Reproductive Health Strategy. O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rkey stakeholders reported that political commitment tofamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is high, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is difficulty <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> translat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> policies <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> programme <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> practice levels <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground. Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to key stakeholders, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is nopolitical or public oppositi<strong>on</strong> to family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepal.For example, an NGO representative stated: “The politicalcommitment is sufficient but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> practice<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ground is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> problem”.Political commitment related tovulnerable groupsTable 13 shows Nepal’s recent policies that relate to familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g for marg<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>alized groups.Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to key stakeholders, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> commitment tovulnerable groups is not adequate even though <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re areTable11185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!