30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al average, while unmet need for familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> TFR each is 1.5 times higher than that of<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al average figures. Hill Dalit 3 have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dhighest TFR (4.0) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> have a CPR of <strong>on</strong>ly 37 per cent<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of 34 per cent. Forthis group, CRP is still 0.8 times <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al average <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is 1.4 times higher than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nati<strong>on</strong>al average. The Tarai Dalit have a TFR of 3.8, withCPR be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 50 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a much lower unmet need forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g (18%). Hill Chhetri 4 have almost <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> samelevel of TFR, CPR <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gas <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al averages. Hill Brahman 5 have TFR below<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al average, with slightly higher unmet need forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> CPR. Hill/Mounta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Janajati 6 stillhave a TFR of 3.1 while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir CPR <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g are 41 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 31 per cent, respectively.PovertyHousehold wealth is clearly associated with CPR <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> TFR.As household wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases, CPR also <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>vice versa. There is a wide gap <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> CPR between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> top <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>bottom household wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tiles. A similar relati<strong>on</strong>shipis observed between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> total fertilityrate. TFR of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> bottom wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile is 4.7; that of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sec<strong>on</strong>d wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile is 3.6. TFR is below replacementlevelfertility <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> top wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile. The overall unmetneed for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is also <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>versely associated with<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> households, suggest<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>poorer is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> household, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> higher is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> vice versa.Adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> young womenEarly marriage <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> prevalent <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepal.Although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> legal age at marriage <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepal is 18 years withparental c<strong>on</strong>sent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 20 years without such c<strong>on</strong>sent, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nati<strong>on</strong>wide median age at marriage for women is just over17 years (2006 NDHS). Women’s median age at marriage<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepal <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased from 16.4 years <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1991 to 17.2 years <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>2006. Median age at first birth <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased slightly from 19.8years to 19.9 years between 1996 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> earliest year withdata) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006. As of 2006, 18.5 per cent of women aged15-19 had begun childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. These ages differ <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas. The median age at marriage for women<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas tends to be about a year later than thosewomen <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural areas. Median age at childbirth is alsoslightly higher <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas than rural areas but <strong>on</strong>ly byabout half a year.Table 10 shows age-adjusted fertility rates, CPR <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>unmet need for adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> young women. The highestneed for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services are for adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>young women. Am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> late adolescents (15-19 years),<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> age-specific fertility rate (ASFR) is very high (98 per1,000 women), while <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir use of c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> is just16 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is veryhigh (38%). For this age group, unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gis very high. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case of young women (20-24 years),ASFR is very high (234 per 1,000 women). On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rh<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir CPR is 31 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services 33 per cent.Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to key stakeholder <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terviews, reproductivehealth programmes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>corporat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g adolescents arenot adequate. Although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government has removedpolicies that restrict adolescents from access<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services, o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r barriers to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir use exist, such as<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>adequate sex educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools, shame <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> negativepercepti<strong>on</strong>s of unmarried women us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>,lack of youth-friendly family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack oftarget<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g efforts. Currentgovernmental efforts are aimed at improv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g sexual <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>reproductive health educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools; at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NGOlevel, programmes are target<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> terms of<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services.Negative c<strong>on</strong>notati<strong>on</strong> of term “familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g”Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to MoHP et al. (2006) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> key stakeholders,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> term “family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g” (pariwar niyojan <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nepalilanguage) has negative c<strong>on</strong>notati<strong>on</strong>s so <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government iswork<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> emphasiz<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a more positive term "byawasthitpariwar" (well-planned family) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stead.Underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> currentsituati<strong>on</strong>Governance of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g/reproductive healthMoHP formulates, plans, m<strong>on</strong>itors, supervises <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>evaluates basic health <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g policies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>programmes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> country. Under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> M<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>istry, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Department of Health Services works as an implement<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gagency. Under that department, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are seven divisi<strong>on</strong>s.Am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> Health Divisi<strong>on</strong> is resp<strong>on</strong>siblefor implement<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g reproductive health strategies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>programmes, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Logistics Management Divisi<strong>on</strong>is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> procurement, warehous<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong> of reproductive health commodities, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gsupplies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> equipment.Coord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> mechanisms exist at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al (Nati<strong>on</strong>al<str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sub-committee) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> district (ReproductiveCoord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> Committee) levels for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> purpose of revis<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> activities. Members of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>nati<strong>on</strong>al sub-committee <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clude <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternati<strong>on</strong>al developmentagencies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> service delivery partners, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> members of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>district committee <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clude civil society organizati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!