Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ... Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
TableTable10Differences between north
Yes 60.9 63.8 26.1 49.3 42.9 77.3 13.2 25.3Miss
- Page 106 and 107: Socio-cultural challenges tofamily
- Page 108 and 109: likely to use contraception than yo
- Page 110 and 111: 15 Tests of statistical significanc
- Page 112 and 113: of the South <stro
- Page 114 and 115: 104
- Page 116: Figurewill exceed the</stro
- Page 119 and 120: in urban (67%) tha
- Page 121 and 122: ased service delivery poin<
- Page 123 and 124: Most FWAs who were recruited two to
- Page 125 and 126: are considered, unmet need for effe
- Page 127 and 128: Households pay the
- Page 129 and 130: Effective public-private partnershi
- Page 131 and 132: ConclusionThe Bangladesh Fa
- Page 133 and 134: the Family
- Page 135 and 136: National Institute for Population R
- Page 137 and 138: IndiaIndiaFamily <
- Page 139: IntroductionThe use of contraceptiv
- Page 142 and 143: TableTable2Indicators of tra<strong
- Page 144 and 145: FigureFigureFigure1Contraceptive pr
- Page 146 and 147: TableTable5Indicators of contracept
- Page 148 and 149: TableTable6Adjusted odds ratios for
- Page 150 and 151: FigureFigure3Contraceptive prevalen
- Page 152 and 153: TableTable7Adjusted and</st
- Page 154 and 155: the north
- Page 158 and 159: TableTable11 Total fertility rate <
- Page 160 and 161: End Note1The first camp was success
- Page 162 and 163: 152
- Page 164 and 165: 154
- Page 166 and 167: Figure1980s and ex
- Page 168 and 169: health care and ed
- Page 170 and 171: assistance from UNFPA and</
- Page 172 and 173: in CPR. Likewise,
- Page 174 and 175: International supp
- Page 176 and 177: in development has
- Page 178 and 179: __________ (2007). Population <stro
- Page 180 and 181: 170
- Page 182 and 183: TableTable2What has the</st
- Page 184 and 185: 174
- Page 186 and 187: per cent of women reported us<stron
- Page 188 and 189: is provider bias that such methods
- Page 190 and 191: TableTable7skewed distribution of h
- Page 192 and 193: TableTable8TableTable9182
- Page 194 and 195: that of the nation
- Page 196 and 197: TableTable12 7some policies that ex
- Page 198 and 199: The system guides the</stro
- Page 200 and 201: FigureFigure4Total donor expenditur
- Page 202 and 203: FigureFigureagain
- Page 204 and 205: Impact of family plannin</s
TableTable10Differences between north <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> south regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> India: 2005/06CharacteristicsResidencePercentage users ofany methodPercentagesterilizedSterilized as %of all usersOverall % distributi<strong>on</strong>North South North South North South North SouthUrban 58.9 63.8 30.3 54.9 51.4 86.1 22.5 37.7Rural 40.0 66.0 26.7 61.4 66.8 93.1 77.5 62.3Educati<strong>on</strong>N<strong>on</strong>e 40.4 69.8 28.4 69.1 70.3 99.0 63.2 35.8Primary 46.0 68.1 30.6 65.8 66.5 96.6 2.4 17.3Sec<strong>on</strong>dary 51.1 61.0 25.1 51.9 49.1 85.1 20.0 39.5Higher 64.9 57.8 17.1 32.3 26.3 55.9 4.2 7.4Miss<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 38.8 0.0 35.7 0.0 92.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Religi<strong>on</strong>Muslim 30.1 57.6 9.8 48.4 32.6 84.0 13.3 11.0H<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>du 46.4 65.9 30.4 60.7 65.5 92.1 84.9 82.7Sikh 71.9 0.0 29.8 100.0 41.4 100.0 0.4 0.0Ja<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 77.7 62.1 40.1 50.5 51.6 81.3 0.4 0.2Christian 37.6 67.9 15.4 54.8 41.0 80.7 0.4 6.0O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 22.8 74.0 14.6 80.3 64.0 108.5 0.7 0.1Miss<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 50.1 80.3 17.4 65.0 34.7 80.9 0.1 0.0WealthLowest 33.2 58.2 23.2 57.8 69.9 99.3 28.2 8,6Sec<strong>on</strong>d 39.6 65.9 26.8 64.8 67.7 98.3 24.2 15.9Middle 43.6 65.1 28.3 62.9 64.9 96.6 18.1 25.8Fourth 52.9 66.1 32.6 59.4 61.6 89.9 15.6 26.7Highest 65.8 66.2 30.8 50.5 46.8 76.3 13.9 23.0Household structureNuclear 49.2 72.4 32.3 67.1 65.7 92.7 43.0 56.6N<strong>on</strong>-nuclear 43.5 58.1 26.1 50.7 60.0 87.3 48.8 38.3N<strong>on</strong>-def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed 22.8 37.8 11.2 31.6 49.1 83.6 8.1 5.1EmploymentCash 50.5 70.2 32.1 68.3 63.6 97.3 21.6 39.1In-k<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d 43.2 70.6 35.7 65.6 82.6 92.9 22.7 8.1Not employed 42.3 60.6 22.5 52.6 53.2 86.8 55.7 52.7RadioNo 42.9 65.7 28.2 61.1 65.7 93.0 67.9 64.9Yes 47.1 64.1 26.1 55.1 55.4 86.0 32.1 35.1Miss<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 52.1 79.6 7.0 64.4 13.4 80.9 0.0 0.1Televisi<strong>on</strong>No 37.3 64.7 25.7 61.1 68.9 94.4 63.0 42.9Yes 56.1 65.5 30.7 57.3 54.7 87.5 37.0 57.0Miss<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 0.0 96.6 0.0 96.6 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0NewspaperNo 41.8 65.6 27.8 62.2 66.5 94.8 86.8 74.7146