Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ... Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
TableTable2Budgeted amount
- Page 67: 2008 2009% Bilateral % Multilateral
- Page 70 and 71: family planning wi
- Page 73 and 74: IntroductionFamily
- Page 75 and 76: The advent of the
- Page 77 and 78: FigureFigure1Oceania and</s
- Page 79 and 80: next 25 years, however, TFR fluctua
- Page 81 and 82: FigureFigureFigure2Total fertility
- Page 83 and 84: family planning pr
- Page 85 and 86: esponsible for the
- Page 87 and 88: that estimates of CPR for earlier p
- Page 90 and 91: Figuremarried at an older age compa
- Page 92 and 93: As previously mentioned most <stron
- Page 94 and 95: FigureFigure945Relationship between
- Page 96 and 97: The concept of “unmet need” has
- Page 98 and 99: TableTable8Percentage of th
- Page 100 and 101: TableTable9Percentage of reasons fo
- Page 102 and 103: family planning pr
- Page 104 and 105: As far as the supp
- Page 106 and 107: Socio-cultural challenges tofamily
- Page 108 and 109: likely to use contraception than yo
- Page 110 and 111: 15 Tests of statistical significanc
- Page 112 and 113: of the South <stro
- Page 114 and 115: 104
- Page 116: Figurewill exceed the</stro
- Page 121 and 122: ased service delivery poin<
- Page 123 and 124: Most FWAs who were recruited two to
- Page 125 and 126: are considered, unmet need for effe
- Page 127 and 128: Households pay the
- Page 129 and 130: Effective public-private partnershi
- Page 131 and 132: ConclusionThe Bangladesh Fa
- Page 133 and 134: the Family
- Page 135 and 136: National Institute for Population R
- Page 137 and 138: IndiaIndiaFamily <
- Page 139: IntroductionThe use of contraceptiv
- Page 142 and 143: TableTable2Indicators of tra<strong
- Page 144 and 145: FigureFigureFigure1Contraceptive pr
- Page 146 and 147: TableTable5Indicators of contracept
- Page 148 and 149: TableTable6Adjusted odds ratios for
- Page 150 and 151: FigureFigure3Contraceptive prevalen
- Page 152 and 153: TableTable7Adjusted and</st
- Page 154 and 155: the north
- Page 156 and 157: TableTable10Differences between nor
- Page 158 and 159: TableTable11 Total fertility rate <
- Page 160 and 161: End Note1The first camp was success
- Page 162 and 163: 152
- Page 164 and 165: 154
- Page 166 and 167: Figure1980s and ex
<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban (67%) than rural areas (49%). Between 1985 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2005, primary school enrolment <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased by about twotimes (from 10 milli<strong>on</strong> to 16 milli<strong>on</strong>) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dary schoolenrolment <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased almost three-fold from 2.6 milli<strong>on</strong> to7.4 milli<strong>on</strong> (Government of Bangladesh (GOB), 2009).Income per capita is <strong>on</strong>ly about US$ 700 annually, withsharp <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>equity <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>come distributi<strong>on</strong>. A large proporti<strong>on</strong>(31.5%) of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong> lives below <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poverty l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e(GOB, 2011). The poverty is more acute <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>urban slums than elsewhere. The current government hasplaced elim<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of poverty <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>equity at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> forefr<strong>on</strong>tof its development strategy. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FY 2010/11 budget, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>government allocated 14.8 per cent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total development<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-development budget <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.5 per cent of totalGDP for social security <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> social empowerment (GOB,2010a). The aim is to br<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g down <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poverty rate from40 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008 to 15 per cent by 2021. The socialsafety net measures also partly address <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> needs of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>elderly populati<strong>on</strong> by provid<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a select number of suchbeneficiaries with a m<strong>on</strong>thly allowance of Tk. 300 (US$ 1= almost 75 taka) (Khuda, 2011).There has been a c<strong>on</strong>siderable rise <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> HumanDevelopment Index (HDI). Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to B<strong>on</strong>gaarts <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Watk<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (1996), HDI for Bangladesh rose by 45.5 percent between 1960 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1980. Between 1980 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2007, it<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased by 1.86 per cent per annum from 0.328 to 0.543,giv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> country a rank of 146th out of 182 countries(UNDP, 2009).Because of ris<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g populati<strong>on</strong> size, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-to-pers<strong>on</strong> ratioc<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ues to worsen. The size of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> average farm is smallernow than previously had been <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>lessnessis <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g as is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number of marg<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al farmers. Thissituati<strong>on</strong> has reduced <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for household labour<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> farm. As a result, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has been <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g ruralto-urbanmigrati<strong>on</strong>, especially to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital city Dhaka(Alam <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Khuda, 2010).The male labour force participati<strong>on</strong> rate (LFPR) hasrema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed almost unchanged at about 56 per cent from1974. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> female LFPR, which was quitenegligible until 1985/86, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased to 29 per cent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>total <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2005/06 (Khuda, 2010). Part of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>female LFPR is due to changes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>iti<strong>on</strong>s used <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>different censuses <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> labour force surveys, while part of<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease is real, reflect<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased participati<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> labour force. In 2006, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> garment <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dustry furnishedjobs for 4.5 milli<strong>on</strong> people <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas, 80 per cent ofwhom were females, mostly young <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmarried (ADB,2006). The number has <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce 2006 because offur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r expansi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> garment sector. There is evidenceof poverty-driven female employment, result<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g frompoor household ec<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> high rates offemale headship (Rahman, 1986; Safilios-Rothschild <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Mahmood, 1989; BIDS, 1990; Rahman <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hossa<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>,1991).Notwithst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that women <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bangladesh are adisadvantaged group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir status has improved. Ingeneral, women now have greater freedom of movement,an enhanced role <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> household decisi<strong>on</strong>-mak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, relativefreedom from more patriarchal structures than before, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased ability to use c<strong>on</strong>traceptives (see, for example,Khuda et al., 1990a; 1990b; 1993b; Schuler <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hashemi,1994; Islam et al., 2000; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> NIPORT, Mitra <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Associates <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Macro <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g>, 2009).There has been a c<strong>on</strong>siderable <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> access to massmedia, both pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> electr<strong>on</strong>ic. Ideati<strong>on</strong>al changesresult<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g from <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased access to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> media have fosteredmodern outlooks <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> attitudes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> general <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thoserelat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to FP <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> RH <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> particular. The <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fluence ofmodernizati<strong>on</strong> has helped to change <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high fertilitynorms, even am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor, who <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves haveexperienced <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fertility over time, though much less so than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relativelywell-off. Am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor, two forces operate to depressfertility norms. One is poverty-led because of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor’s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ability to ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a large family, while <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r isaspirati<strong>on</strong>-driven: people be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g imbued with modern ideas<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> attitudes (see also Caldwell et al., 1999; Khuda et al.,2001).<str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmeEvoluti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> developmentFP activities <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Bangladesh have been carried out <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> threedist<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ct phases. Phase 1 activities were largely voluntary,with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sett<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g up of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> Associati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>1953 by a group of dedicated social workers who realized<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> adverse c<strong>on</strong>sequences of rapid populati<strong>on</strong> growth<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> society’s development efforts. Subsequently, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sevoluntary activities received some limited support from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>government.Phase II activities began <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1960, with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> governmenttak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g some broader steps to check <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong>growth rate. Populati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol was made <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> officialpolicy <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> First Five-Year Plan of Pakistan (1960-1965). A sizable cadre of FP pers<strong>on</strong>nel was recruited; anumber of cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ics were set up; a tra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g-cum-research<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stitute was established; <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong>, educati<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> communicati<strong>on</strong> (IEC) activities emphasized cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>icbasedcounsel<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> dissem<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> of knowledge aboutc<strong>on</strong>traceptives by physicians <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> paramedics.Phase III activities were <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itiated <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1973 with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>109