Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme to attempt to change familysize preferences. ICPD champi<strong>on</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual sovereigntyover family size decisi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> promoted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual needsover demographic targets 23 . This would appear to rule out<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> promoti<strong>on</strong> of small families <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> general by governments,<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g workers. However, familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g workers obviously have a role to play <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> promot<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept of birth spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terest of ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> health of mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> children. As Bhushan (1997)po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ted out, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is someth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of a paradox <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept of unmet need: “[O]<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equal,<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use decreases unmet need,whereas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases unmetneed”. Thus, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effort to promote child-spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g am<strong>on</strong>gwomen who do not already have an unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gwill <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease unmet need by <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g potential dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>– unless <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>al unmet need created is immediatelycompensated for by an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use.This essentially br<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue back to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>s whywomen who currently have an unmet need do not <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tendto use c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> future. An <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>without address<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g current health c<strong>on</strong>cerns might bec<strong>on</strong>sidered counterproductive 24 .AccessIn situati<strong>on</strong>s such as those found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea,where a large comp<strong>on</strong>ent of unmet need is related to lackof knowledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack of access, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> policy implicati<strong>on</strong>s areclearer. As noted previously, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 DHS of PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea, 43.4 per cent of currently married womenwho said that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y did not <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tend to use c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> future <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y had no knowledge of amethod of c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>, as compared with 14.4 per centwho menti<strong>on</strong>ed some form of oppositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13.8 percent who menti<strong>on</strong>ed fear of side effects. Clearly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a need to exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge of familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, but, as already noted, exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g knowledge hasto go h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> supplies,as well as address<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g oppositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> side effects. It wouldappear that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reverse is also true: exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g supplies<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services without improv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality of couples’<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals’ knowledge about methods would notnecessarily <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use.Target<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g specific groups with anunmet needBecause fertility preferences change through time, it hasbeen argued (Casterl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, 2000) that <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividualscan move <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> out of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state of unmet need, mak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g itimpossible to m<strong>on</strong>itor which <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals have an unmetneed at a specific po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> time. These authors argue thatit is <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>appropriate to expect health <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gworkers to m<strong>on</strong>itor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertility preferences of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals.The approach <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y advocate is for programme managersto “be well <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formed about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> societal-specific causes ofunmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly, develop <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terventi<strong>on</strong>s toovercome those obstacles”. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y also acknowledgethat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic characteristics of pers<strong>on</strong>s withunmet need may be more stable than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> status of specific<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals whose circumstances change through time.Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a case for develop<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmesthat are aimed at those groups that are more likely to havean unmet need than o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r groups.Until recent DHS were c<strong>on</strong>ducted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it wouldhave been reas<strong>on</strong>able to assume that women liv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> remote areas would be much more likely to have anunmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g than women liv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>urban centres. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> term “rural” residence oftenimplies outer-isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s that suffer from costly <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>frequenttransport, poor health services (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g difficulties <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>reta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g staff <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> keep<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g stocks of medic<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e up to date).However DHS results <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no strictdeterm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ism between rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban residence <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> crosscountrycomparis<strong>on</strong>, whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator employed isCPR or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage of women with an unmet need. Asalready noted, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> some countries unmet need is higher <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>urban areas than <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> this is also true of CPR.In some countries <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is little difference. It is notable that<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two countries with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest unmet need (PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Samoa), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no apparent differencebetween rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas 25 .On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of such data, it is not possible to say thatfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes are generally weaker <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> ruralthan urban areas. The <strong>on</strong>ly possible generalizati<strong>on</strong> from<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data is that each country is different <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> programmesneed to be tailored to specific nati<strong>on</strong>al circumstances.As with rural-urban differences, it would have beenreas<strong>on</strong>able <strong>on</strong> logical grounds to assume that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> moreeducated women would have lower unmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>higher c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use. This expectati<strong>on</strong> arises from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>probability that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more educated women would havemore knowledge of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> be morelikely employed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> paid work outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> home. However<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> associati<strong>on</strong> between educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reproductivebehaviour was already questi<strong>on</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> earlier KAP studiesc<strong>on</strong>ducted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The 1995 KAP study carriedout <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vanuatu found that unmet need for effective familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g am<strong>on</strong>g currently married (or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> uni<strong>on</strong>) womenwas 49.1 per cent for women with college or universityeducati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 49.7 per cent for women who had “no92