30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme to attempt to change familysize preferences. ICPD champi<strong>on</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual sovereigntyover family size decisi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> promoted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividual needsover demographic targets 23 . This would appear to rule out<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> promoti<strong>on</strong> of small families <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> general by governments,<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g workers. However, familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g workers obviously have a role to play <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> promot<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept of birth spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terest of ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> health of mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> children. As Bhushan (1997)po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ted out, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is someth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of a paradox <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept of unmet need: “[O]<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r th<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g equal,<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use decreases unmet need,whereas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases unmetneed”. Thus, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effort to promote child-spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g am<strong>on</strong>gwomen who do not already have an unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gwill <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease unmet need by <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g potential dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>– unless <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>al unmet need created is immediatelycompensated for by an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use.This essentially br<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue back to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>s whywomen who currently have an unmet need do not <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tendto use c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> future. An <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>without address<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g current health c<strong>on</strong>cerns might bec<strong>on</strong>sidered counterproductive 24 .AccessIn situati<strong>on</strong>s such as those found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea,where a large comp<strong>on</strong>ent of unmet need is related to lackof knowledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack of access, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> policy implicati<strong>on</strong>s areclearer. As noted previously, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 DHS of PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea, 43.4 per cent of currently married womenwho said that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y did not <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tend to use c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> future <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y had no knowledge of amethod of c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>, as compared with 14.4 per centwho menti<strong>on</strong>ed some form of oppositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 13.8 percent who menti<strong>on</strong>ed fear of side effects. Clearly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a need to exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge of familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, but, as already noted, exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g knowledge hasto go h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> supplies,as well as address<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g oppositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> side effects. It wouldappear that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reverse is also true: exp<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g supplies<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services without improv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality of couples’<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals’ knowledge about methods would notnecessarily <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use.Target<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g specific groups with anunmet needBecause fertility preferences change through time, it hasbeen argued (Casterl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, 2000) that <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividualscan move <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> out of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state of unmet need, mak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g itimpossible to m<strong>on</strong>itor which <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals have an unmetneed at a specific po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> time. These authors argue thatit is <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>appropriate to expect health <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gworkers to m<strong>on</strong>itor <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertility preferences of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals.The approach <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y advocate is for programme managersto “be well <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formed about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> societal-specific causes ofunmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly, develop <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terventi<strong>on</strong>s toovercome those obstacles”. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y also acknowledgethat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic characteristics of pers<strong>on</strong>s withunmet need may be more stable than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> status of specific<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dividuals whose circumstances change through time.Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a case for develop<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmesthat are aimed at those groups that are more likely to havean unmet need than o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r groups.Until recent DHS were c<strong>on</strong>ducted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it wouldhave been reas<strong>on</strong>able to assume that women liv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> remote areas would be much more likely to have anunmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g than women liv<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>urban centres. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> term “rural” residence oftenimplies outer-isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s that suffer from costly <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>frequenttransport, poor health services (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clud<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g difficulties <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>reta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g staff <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> keep<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g stocks of medic<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e up to date).However DHS results <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no strictdeterm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ism between rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban residence <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> crosscountrycomparis<strong>on</strong>, whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator employed isCPR or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage of women with an unmet need. Asalready noted, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> some countries unmet need is higher <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>urban areas than <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> this is also true of CPR.In some countries <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is little difference. It is notable that<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two countries with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest unmet need (PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Samoa), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is no apparent differencebetween rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas 25 .On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of such data, it is not possible to say thatfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes are generally weaker <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> ruralthan urban areas. The <strong>on</strong>ly possible generalizati<strong>on</strong> from<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data is that each country is different <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> programmesneed to be tailored to specific nati<strong>on</strong>al circumstances.As with rural-urban differences, it would have beenreas<strong>on</strong>able <strong>on</strong> logical grounds to assume that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> moreeducated women would have lower unmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>higher c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use. This expectati<strong>on</strong> arises from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>probability that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more educated women would havemore knowledge of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> be morelikely employed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> paid work outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> home. However<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> associati<strong>on</strong> between educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> reproductivebehaviour was already questi<strong>on</strong>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> earlier KAP studiesc<strong>on</strong>ducted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The 1995 KAP study carriedout <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vanuatu found that unmet need for effective familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g am<strong>on</strong>g currently married (or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> uni<strong>on</strong>) womenwas 49.1 per cent for women with college or universityeducati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 49.7 per cent for women who had “no92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!