30.07.2015 Views

el documento en el formato PDF

el documento en el formato PDF

el documento en el formato PDF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

K<strong>en</strong>yaDemographic andHealth Survey2008-09


This report summarises the findings of the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS)carried out by the K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) in partnership with the National AIDSControl Council (NACC), the National AIDS/STD Control Programme (NASCOP), the Ministry ofHealth and Sanitation, the K<strong>en</strong>ya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), and the National CoordinatingAg<strong>en</strong>cy for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCAPD). ICF Macro provided technical assistance for thesurvey through the USAID-funded MEASURE DHS programme, which is designed to assistdev<strong>el</strong>oping countries to collect data on fertility, family planning, and maternal and child health.Funding for the KDHS was received from USAID/K<strong>en</strong>ya, the United Nations Population Fund(UNFPA), the United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’s Fund (UNICEF), UNAIDS, and the World Bank. Theopinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe donor organisations.Additional information about the survey may be obtained from the K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau ofStatistics (KNBS), P.O. Box 30266, Nairobi (T<strong>el</strong>ephone: 254.20.340.929; Fax: 254.20.315.977,email: director@cbs.go.ke).Additional information about the DHS programme may be obtained from MEASURE DHS,ICF Macro, 11785 B<strong>el</strong>tsville Drive, Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705, U.S.A. (T<strong>el</strong>ephone:1.301.572.0200; Fax: 1.301.572.0999; e-mail: reports@macrointernational.com).Recomm<strong>en</strong>ded citation:K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and ICF Macro. 2010. K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and HealthSurvey 2008-09. Calverton, Maryland: KNBS and ICF Macro.


CONTENTSTABLES AND FIGURES .............................................................................................................. ixFOREWORD ........................................................................................................................... xviiACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... xixSUMMARY OF FINDINGS ....................................................................................................... xxiMAP OF KENYA ..................................................................................................................... xxviCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.1 Geography, History, and the Economy ................................................................ 11.1.1 Geography .............................................................................................. 11.1.2 History.................................................................................................... 11.1.3 Economy ................................................................................................ 21.2 Population .......................................................................................................... 31.3 Population and Family Planning Policies and Programmes .................................. 31.4 Health Priorities and Programmes ....................................................................... 51.5 Strategic Framework to Combat the HIV/AIDS Epidemic ..................................... 61.6 Objectives of the Survey ..................................................................................... 61.7 Survey Organisation ............................................................................................ 71.8 Sample Design .................................................................................................... 81.9 Questionnaires ................................................................................................... 81.10 HIV Testing ......................................................................................................... 91.11 Training ............................................................................................................ 101.12 Fi<strong>el</strong>dwork ......................................................................................................... 111.13 Data Processing ................................................................................................ 121.14 Response Rates ................................................................................................. 12CHAPTER 2HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS2.1 Population by Age and Sex ............................................................................... 132.2 Household Composition ................................................................................... 142.3 Education of the Household Population ............................................................ 152.3.1 Educational Attainm<strong>en</strong>t ......................................................................... 152.3.2 School Att<strong>en</strong>dance Rates ...................................................................... 172.4 Household Environm<strong>en</strong>t ................................................................................... 202.4.1 Drinking Water ..................................................................................... 202.4.2 Household Sanitation Facilities ............................................................. 222.4.3 Housing Characteristics ......................................................................... 232.5 Household Possessions ..................................................................................... 242.6 Wealth Index .................................................................................................... 252.7 Birth Registration .............................................................................................. 26Cont<strong>en</strong>ts | iii


CHAPTER 3CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS3.1 Characteristics of Survey Respond<strong>en</strong>ts .............................................................. 293.2 Educational Attainm<strong>en</strong>t by Background Characteristics ..................................... 313.3 Literacy............................................................................................................. 323.4 Access to Mass Media ....................................................................................... 343.5 Employm<strong>en</strong>t ..................................................................................................... 373.6 Occupation ...................................................................................................... 393.7 Earnings and Type of Employm<strong>en</strong>t .................................................................... 413.8 Health Insurance Coverage ............................................................................... 433.9 Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Tuberculosis ........................................... 433.10 Smoking ........................................................................................................... 45CHAPTER 4FERTILITY LEVELS, TRENDS, AND DIFFERENTIALS4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 474.2 Curr<strong>en</strong>t Fertility ................................................................................................ 474.3 Fertility Tr<strong>en</strong>ds .................................................................................................. 504.4 Childr<strong>en</strong> Ever Born and Childr<strong>en</strong> Surviving ....................................................... 524.5 Birth Intervals ................................................................................................... 534.6 Age at First Birth ............................................................................................... 544.7 Te<strong>en</strong>age Fertility ............................................................................................... 55CHAPTER 5FAMILY PLANNING5.1 Knowledge of Contraceptive Methods .............................................................. 575.2 Ever Use of Family Planning Methods ............................................................... 595.3 Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Contraceptive Methods ............................................................. 615.4 Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in Contraceptive Use by Background Characteristics ..................... 645.5 Number of Childr<strong>en</strong> at First Use of Contraception ............................................ 665.6 Knowledge of Fertile Period .............................................................................. 665.7 Timing of Sterilisation ....................................................................................... 675.8 Source of Contraception ................................................................................... 675.9 Cost of Contraceptive Methods ......................................................................... 685.10 Informed Choice .............................................................................................. 695.11 Contraceptive Discontinuation .......................................................................... 705.12 Future Use of Contraception ............................................................................. 715.13 Reasons for Not Int<strong>en</strong>ding to Use...................................................................... 715.14 Exposure to Family Planning Messages .............................................................. 725.15 Contact of Non-users with Family Planning Providers ........................................ 755.16 Husband/Partner’s Knowledge of Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Contraceptive Use ......................... 76CHAPTER 6OTHER PROXIMATE DETERMINANTS OF FERTILITY6.1 Curr<strong>en</strong>t Marital Status ....................................................................................... 796.2 Polygyny ........................................................................................................... 806.3 Age at First Marriage ......................................................................................... 826.4 Age at First Sexual Intercourse .......................................................................... 846.5 Rec<strong>en</strong>t Sexual Activity ....................................................................................... 866.6 Postpartum Am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, Abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, and Insusceptibility .............................. 896.7 M<strong>en</strong>opause ...................................................................................................... 90iv | Cont<strong>en</strong>ts


CHAPTER 7FERTILITY PREFERENCES7.1 Desire for More Childr<strong>en</strong> .................................................................................. 937.2 Desire to Limit Childbearing by Background Characteristics .............................. 957.3 Need for Family Planning Services .................................................................... 967.4 Ideal Number of Childr<strong>en</strong> ................................................................................. 977.5 Mean Ideal Number of Childr<strong>en</strong> by Background Characteristics ........................ 997.6 Fertility Planning Status ..................................................................................... 997.7 Wanted Fertility Rates ..................................................................................... 101CHAPTER 8INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITY8.1 Lev<strong>el</strong>s and Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Infant and Child Mortality .............................................. 1038.2 Data Quality ................................................................................................... 1058.3 Socioeconomic Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in Infant and Child Mortality ............................... 1068.4 Demographic Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in Infant and Child Mortality ................................. 1088.5 Perinatal Mortality .......................................................................................... 1098.6 High-risk Fertility Behaviour ............................................................................ 110CHAPTER 9MATERNAL HEALTH9.1 Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care ................................................................................................ 1139.1.1 Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care Coverage .................................................................... 1139.1.2 Source of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care .................................................................... 1159.1.3 Number and Timing of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care Visits ....................................... 1169.1.4 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care ........................................................... 1169.2 Tetanus Toxoid Injections ............................................................................... 1189.3 Place of D<strong>el</strong>ivery ............................................................................................ 1199.4 Assistance during D<strong>el</strong>ivery .............................................................................. 1229.5 Postnatal Care ................................................................................................ 123CHAPTER 10 CHILD HEALTH10.1 Weight and Size at Birth ................................................................................. 12710.2 Vaccination Coverage ..................................................................................... 12810.3 Acute Respiratory Infection ............................................................................. 13210.4 Fever .............................................................................................................. 13410.5 Diarrhoeal Disease ......................................................................................... 13510.6 Knowledge of ORS Packets ............................................................................. 13910.7 Stool Disposal ................................................................................................. 139CHAPTER 11 NUTRITION OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN11.1 Nutritional Status of Childr<strong>en</strong> .......................................................................... 14111.1.1 Measurem<strong>en</strong>t of Nutritional Status among Young Childr<strong>en</strong> ................. 14111.1.2 Results of Data Collection ................................................................... 14211.1.3 Lev<strong>el</strong>s of Malnutrition ......................................................................... 14211.2 Initiation of Breastfeeding ............................................................................... 14611.3 Breastfeeding Status by Age ............................................................................ 148Cont<strong>en</strong>ts | v


11.4 Duration and Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of Breastfeeding ....................................................... 15011.5 Types of Complem<strong>en</strong>tary Foods ...................................................................... 15111.6 Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices ....................................................... 15211.7 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t Intake among Childr<strong>en</strong> ............................................................. 15411.8 Nutritional Status of Wom<strong>en</strong> .......................................................................... 15711.9 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t Intake among Mothers .............................................................. 158CHAPTER 12 MALARIA12.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 16112.2 Household Ownership of Mosquito Nets ........................................................ 16212.3 Use of Mosquito Nets ..................................................................................... 16412.4 Intermitt<strong>en</strong>t Prev<strong>en</strong>tive Treatm<strong>en</strong>t of Malaria in Pregnancy ............................. 16712.5 Malaria Case Managem<strong>en</strong>t among Childr<strong>en</strong> .................................................... 168CHAPTER 13 HIV/AIDS-RELATED KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIOUR13.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 17313.2 HIV/AIDS Knowledge of Transmission and Prev<strong>en</strong>tion Methods ...................... 17313.2.1 Awar<strong>en</strong>ess of HIV/AIDS ...................................................................... 17313.2.2 Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tion ............................................................. 17413.2.3 Rejection of Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS ..................................... 17713.2.4 Knowledge of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV ........................... 18013.3 Attitudes towards People Living with AIDS ...................................................... 18113.4 Attitudes Towards Condom Education for Youth ............................................. 18513.5 Higher Risk Sex .............................................................................................. 18613.5.1 Multiple Partners and Condom Use .................................................... 18613.5.2 Transactional Sex ................................................................................ 19013.6 Coverage of HIV Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing ....................................................... 19013.6.1 G<strong>en</strong>eral HIV Testing ........................................................................... 19013.6.2 HIV Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing during Pregnancy ................................... 19313.7 Male Circumcision .......................................................................................... 19413.8 S<strong>el</strong>f-Reporting of Sexually Transmitted Infections ............................................ 19413.9 HIV/AIDS Knowledge and Sexual Behaviour among Youth ............................. 19513.9.1 HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge among Young Adults ............................ 19613.9.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Age at First Sex .................................................................... 19713.9.3 Condom Use at First Sex ..................................................................... 19913.9.4 Abstin<strong>en</strong>ce and Premarital Sex ............................................................ 20013.9.5 Higher-Risk Sex and Condom Use among Young Adults ..................... 20213.9.6 Cross-g<strong>en</strong>erational Sexual Partners ...................................................... 20513.9.7 Drunk<strong>en</strong>ness during Sex among Young Adults .................................... 20613.9.8 Voluntary HIV Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing among Young Adults .............. 207CHAPTER 14 HIV PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS14.1 Coverage of HIV Testing ................................................................................. 20914.2 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Age ................................................................................... 21314.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce ............................................................................... 214vi | Cont<strong>en</strong>ts


14.4 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Socioeconomic Characteristics .......................................... 21514.5 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Demographic Characteristics and Sexual Behaviour .......... 21714.6 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among Youth ......................................................................... 22014.7 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Other Characteristics ......................................................... 22314.8 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Male Circumcision ............................................................ 22414.9 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among Couples ...................................................................... 22614.10 Distribution of the HIV Burd<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya ......................................................... 227CHAPTER 15 WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT AND DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTHOUTCOMES15.1 Employm<strong>en</strong>t and Form of Earnings.................................................................. 22915.2 Controls over Earnings .................................................................................... 23015.2.1 Control over Wife’s Earnings ............................................................... 23015.2.2 Control over Husband’s Earnings ........................................................ 23115.3 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Participation in Decision-making ..................................................... 23315.4 Attitudes towards Wife Beating ....................................................................... 23615.5 M<strong>en</strong>’s Attitudes towards Wife’s Refusing Sex .................................................. 23915.6 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t Indicators ................................................................ 24115.7 Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Contraception by Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Status .......................................... 24115.8 Ideal Family Size and Unmet Need by Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Status .................................. 24215.9 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Status and Reproductive Health Care .............................................. 243CHAPTER 16 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE16.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 24516.2 Data Collection............................................................................................... 24516.3 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of Physical Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ...................................................................... 24716.4 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of Sexual Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ........................................................................ 24916.5 Marital Control ............................................................................................... 25116.6 Marital Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ............................................................................................. 25316.7 Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of Spousal Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ....................................................................... 25816.8 Physical Consequ<strong>en</strong>ces of Spousal Viol<strong>en</strong>ce .................................................... 25916.9 Viol<strong>en</strong>ce Initiated by Wom<strong>en</strong> Against Husbands ............................................. 26016.10 Response to Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ..................................................................................... 26216.11 Female G<strong>en</strong>ital Cutting ................................................................................... 264CHAPTER 17 ADULT AND MATERNAL MORTALITY17.1 Data ............................................................................................................... 26917.2 Estimates of Adult Mortality ............................................................................ 27017.3 Estimates of Maternal Mortality ....................................................................... 272REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 275APPENDIX A SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................................... 283APPENDIX B ESTIMATES OF SAMPLING ERRORS ............................................................. 289APPENDIX C DATA QUALITY ............................................................................................. 305APPENDIX D LIST OF 2008-09 KDHS PARTICIPANTS ....................................................... 311APPENDIX E QUESTIONNAIRES ........................................................................................ 319Cont<strong>en</strong>ts | vii


TABLES AND FIGURESCHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONTable 1.1 Basic demographic indicators.............................................................................. 3Table 1.2 Results of the household and individual interviews ........................................... 12CHAPTER 2HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICSTable 2.1 Household population by age, sex, and resid<strong>en</strong>ce ............................................ 13Table 2.2 Household composition .................................................................................... 15Table 2.3.1 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t of the female household population ............................. 16Table 2.3.2 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t of the male household population ................................ 17Table 2.4 School att<strong>en</strong>dance ratios ................................................................................... 18Table 2.5 School att<strong>en</strong>dance ............................................................................................ 19Table 2.6 Household drinking water ................................................................................ 21Table 2.7 Household sanitation facilities ........................................................................... 22Table 2.8 Household characteristics ................................................................................. 23Table 2.9 Household durable goods ................................................................................. 25Table 2.10 Wealth quintiles ............................................................................................... 26Table 2.11 Birth registration of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five ....................................................... 27Table 2.12 Reason for not registering birth ......................................................................... 28Figure 2.1 Population Pyramid .......................................................................................... 14Figure 2.2 Age-specific Att<strong>en</strong>dance Rates of the de-facto Population 5 to 24 Years ............ 20CHAPTER 3CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTSTable 3.1 Background characteristics of respond<strong>en</strong>ts ........................................................ 30Table 3.2.1 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t: Wom<strong>en</strong> ...................................................................... 31Table 3.2.2 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t: M<strong>en</strong> ............................................................................ 32Table 3.3.1 Literacy: Wom<strong>en</strong> .............................................................................................. 33Table 3.3.2 Literacy: M<strong>en</strong> ................................................................................................... 34Table 3.4.1 Exposure to mass media: Wom<strong>en</strong> ..................................................................... 35Table 3.4.2 Exposure to mass media: M<strong>en</strong> .......................................................................... 36Table 3.5.1 Employm<strong>en</strong>t status: Wom<strong>en</strong> ............................................................................. 37Table 3.5.2 Employm<strong>en</strong>t status: M<strong>en</strong> .................................................................................. 38Table 3.6.1 Occupation: Wom<strong>en</strong> ........................................................................................ 40Table 3.6.2 Occupation: M<strong>en</strong> ............................................................................................. 41Table 3.7 Type of employm<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> ................................................................ 42Table 3.8.1 Knowledge and attitude concerning tuberculosis: Wom<strong>en</strong> ................................ 44Table 3.8.2 Knowledge and attitude concerning tuberculosis: M<strong>en</strong> ..................................... 45Table 3.9 Use of tobacco: M<strong>en</strong> ........................................................................................ 46Figure 3.1 Access to Mass Media ....................................................................................... 36Figure 3.2 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Employm<strong>en</strong>t Status in the Past 12 Months ......................................... 39Figure 3.3 Employm<strong>en</strong>t Characteristics among Working Wom<strong>en</strong> ....................................... 42Figure 3.4 Health Insurance Coverage ............................................................................... 43Tables and Figures | ix


CHAPTER 4FERTILITY LEVELS, TRENDS, AND DIFFERENTIALSTable 4.1 Curr<strong>en</strong>t fertility ................................................................................................. 47Table 4.2 Fertility by background characteristics ............................................................... 48Table 4.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in age-specific fertility rates ................................................................... 50Table 4.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in fertility by background characteristics ................................................ 51Table 4.5 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in age-specific fertility rates ................................................................... 51Table 4.6 Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born and living ............................................................................ 52Table 4.7 Birth intervals .................................................................................................... 53Table 4.8 Age at first birth ................................................................................................ 54Table 4.9 Median age at first birth .................................................................................... 55Table 4.10 Te<strong>en</strong>age pregnancy and motherhood ............................................................... 56Figure 4.1 Total Fertility Rates by Background Characteristics ............................................ 49Figure 4.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Total Fertility Rate, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1975-2008 ............................................... 50CHAPTER 5FAMILY PLANNINGTable 5.1 Knowledge of contraceptive methods ............................................................... 58Table 5.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in contraceptive knowledge ................................................................... 59Table 5.3 Ever use of contraception ................................................................................. 60Table 5.4 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by age ................................................................. 63Table 5.5 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by background characteristics .............................. 65Table 5.6 Number of childr<strong>en</strong> at first use of contraception ............................................... 66Table 5.7 Knowledge of fertile period ............................................................................... 66Table 5.8 Timing of sterilisation ........................................................................................ 67Table 5.9 Source of modern contraception methods ........................................................ 68Table 5.10 Cost of modern contraceptive methods ............................................................ 69Table 5.11 Informed choice ............................................................................................... 70Table 5.12 First-year contraceptive discontinuation rates .................................................... 70Table 5.13 Future use of contraception .............................................................................. 71Table 5.14 Reason for not int<strong>en</strong>ding to use contraception in the future .............................. 71Table 5.15 Preferred method of contraception for future use ............................................. 72Table 5.16 Exposure to family planning messages ............................................................... 73Table 5.17 Exposure to condom messages .......................................................................... 74Table 5.18 Acceptability of condom messages .................................................................... 75Table 5.19 Contact of nonusers with family planning providers .......................................... 76Table 5.20 Husband/partner’s knowledge of wom<strong>en</strong>’s use of contraception ....................... 77Table 5.21 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward contraception ............................................................... 78Figure 5.1Figure 5.2Figure 5.3Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Contraceptive Use, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1978-2008 (perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> using any method) .................................................................. 61Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Specific Contraceptive Methods among Curr<strong>en</strong>tlyMarried Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1998-2008 ................................................ 62Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Any Contraceptive Method among Curr<strong>en</strong>tly MarriedWom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49, by Background Characteristics ........................................... 64x | Tables and Figures


CHAPTER 6OTHER PROXIMATE DETERMINANTS OF FERTILITYTable 6.1 Curr<strong>en</strong>t marital status ........................................................................................ 79Table 6.2.1 Number of wom<strong>en</strong>’s co-wives .......................................................................... 80Table 6.2.2 Number of m<strong>en</strong>’s co-wives ............................................................................... 81Table 6.3 Age at first marriage .......................................................................................... 83Table 6.4 Median age at first marriage .............................................................................. 84Table 6.5 Age at first sexual intercourse ............................................................................ 85Table 6.6 Median age at first intercourse .......................................................................... 86Table 6.7.1 Rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity: Wom<strong>en</strong> ......................................................................... 87Table 6.7.2 Rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity: M<strong>en</strong> .............................................................................. 88Table 6.8 Postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, abstin<strong>en</strong>ce and insusceptibility ................................ 89Table 6.9 Median duration of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, postpartum abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, and postpartuminsusceptibility .................................................................................................. 90Table 6.10 M<strong>en</strong>opause ...................................................................................................... 91Figure 6.1CHAPTER 7Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of Curr<strong>en</strong>tly Married Wom<strong>en</strong> Whose Husbands Have At LeastOne Other Wife ............................................................................................... 81FERTILITY PREFERENCESTable 7.1 Fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces by number of living childr<strong>en</strong> .............................................. 94Table 7.2 Desire to limit childbearing ............................................................................... 95Table 7.3 Need and demand for family planning among curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> .......... 97Table 7.4 Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> .................................................................................. 98Table 7.5 Mean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> by background characteristics .......................... 99Table 7.6 Fertility planning status ................................................................................... 100Table 7.7 Wanted fertility rates ...................................................................................... 101Figure 7.1 Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces among Curr<strong>en</strong>tly Married Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49 .................... 94Figure 7.2 Planning Status of Births .................................................................................. 100CHAPTER 8INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITYTable 8.1 Early childhood mortality rates ........................................................................ 104Table 8.2 Early childhood mortality rates by socioeconomic characteristics .................... 107Table 8.3 Early childhood mortality rates by demographic characteristics ....................... 108Table 8.4 Perinatal mortality .......................................................................................... 109Table 8.5 High-risk fertility behaviour ............................................................................. 110Figure 8.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Infant and Under-Five Mortality 2003 KDHS and 2008-09 KDHS ... 104Figure 8.2 Under-Five Mortality by Background Characteristics ....................................... 107CHAPTER 9MATERNAL HEALTHTable 9.1 Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care ................................................................................................ 114Table 9.2 Source of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care ................................................................................. 115Table 9.3 Number of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits and timing of first visit .................................... 116Table 9.4 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care ........................................................................ 117Table 9.5 Tetanus toxoid injections ................................................................................ 119Table 9.6 Place of d<strong>el</strong>ivery ............................................................................................. 120Tables and Figures | xi


Table 9.7 Reason for not d<strong>el</strong>ivering in a health facility .................................................... 121Table 9.8 Assistance during d<strong>el</strong>ivery ............................................................................... 122Table 9.9 Timing of first postnatal checkup..................................................................... 124Table 9.10 Type of provider of first postnatal checkup ..................................................... 125Figure 9.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Receipt of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care from a Skilled Medical Provider,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2003-2008 ........................................................................................... 114Figure 9.2 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care ....................................................................... 118Figure 9.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in D<strong>el</strong>ivery Care .................................................................................. 123CHAPTER 10 CHILD HEALTHTable 10.1 Child’s weight and size at birth ....................................................................... 128Table 10.2 Vaccinations by source of information ............................................................ 129Table 10.3 Vaccinations by background characteristics ..................................................... 131Table 10.4 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of symptoms of ARI ................................................ 133Table 10.5 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of fever .................................................................. 134Table 10.6 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce of diarrhoea .................................................................................. 135Table 10.7 Diarrhoea treatm<strong>en</strong>t ....................................................................................... 136Table 10.8 Feeding practices during diarrhoea ................................................................. 138Table 10.9 Knowledge of ORS ......................................................................................... 139Table 10.10 Disposal of childr<strong>en</strong>’s stools ............................................................................ 140Figure 10.1 Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of Childr<strong>en</strong> Age 12-23 Months with Specific Vaccinations............. 130Figure 10.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Childhood Vaccination Coverage .................................................... 132CHAPTER 11 NUTRITION OF WOMEN AND CHILDRENTable 11.1 Nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> ........................................................................... 143Table 11.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> ............................................................ 145Table 11.3 Initial breastfeeding ........................................................................................ 147Table 11.4 Breastfeeding status by age ............................................................................. 149Table 11.5 Median duration and frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of breastfeeding ............................................ 150Table 11.6Foods and liquids consumed by childr<strong>en</strong> in the day or night preceding theinterview ........................................................................................................ 152Table 11.7 Infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices ............................................... 153Table 11.8 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t intake among childr<strong>en</strong> .............................................................. 155Table 11.9 Pres<strong>en</strong>ce of iodized salt in household ............................................................. 157Table 11.10 Nutritional status of wom<strong>en</strong> ............................................................................ 158Table 11.11 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t intake among mothers .............................................................. 159Figure 11.1 Nutritional Status of Childr<strong>en</strong> by Age .............................................................. 144Figure 11.2 Proportion of Underweight Childr<strong>en</strong> by Province, 2003 and 2008-09 ............ 146Figure 11.3 Pr<strong>el</strong>acteal Liquids ............................................................................................ 148Figure 11.4 Infant Feeding Practices by Age ...................................................................... 149Figure 11.5 Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) Practices ............................................. 154xii | Tables and Figures


CHAPTER 12 MALARIATable 12.1 Ownership of mosquito nets ........................................................................... 163Table 12.2 Use of mosquito nets by childr<strong>en</strong> .................................................................... 165Table 12.3 Use of mosquito nets by wom<strong>en</strong> ..................................................................... 166Table 12.4Prophylactic use of antimalarial drugs and use of intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tivetreatm<strong>en</strong>t (IPT) by wom<strong>en</strong> during pregnancy .................................................. 168Table 12.5 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and prompt treatm<strong>en</strong>t of fever ...................................................... 169Table 12.6 Type and timing of antimalarial drugs ............................................................. 170Table 12.7 Availability at home of antimalarial drugs tak<strong>en</strong> by childr<strong>en</strong> with fever ............ 171Figure 12.1 Ownership of Mosquito Nets, 2003-2009 ....................................................... 163Figure 12.2 Use of Mosquito Nets by Childr<strong>en</strong> under Five ................................................. 165Figure 12.3 Use of Mosquito Nets by Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49 .................................................. 167CHAPTER 13 HIV/AIDS-RELATED KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, AND BEHAVIOURTable 13.1 Knowledge of AIDS......................................................................................... 174Table 13.2 Knowledge of HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion methods .......................................................... 175Table 13.3.1 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS: Wom<strong>en</strong> ........................................... 177Table 13.3.2 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS: M<strong>en</strong> ................................................. 178Table 13.4 Knowledge of prev<strong>en</strong>tion of mother to child transmission of HIV .................... 181Table 13.5.1 Accepting attitudes toward those living with HIV/AIDS: Wom<strong>en</strong> ..................... 182Table 13.5.2 Accepting attitudes toward those living with HIV/AIDS: M<strong>en</strong> .......................... 184Table 13.6 Adult support of education about condom use to prev<strong>en</strong>t AIDS ...................... 186Table 13.7.1 Multiple sexual partners and higher-risk sexual intercourse in the pastTable 13.7.212 months: Wom<strong>en</strong> ....................................................................................... 188Multiple sexual partners and higher-risk sexual intercourse in the past12 months: M<strong>en</strong> ............................................................................................. 189Table 13.8 Paym<strong>en</strong>t for sexual intercourse: M<strong>en</strong> .............................................................. 190Table 13.9.1 Coverage of prior HIV testing: Wom<strong>en</strong> ........................................................... 191Table 13.9.2 Coverage of prior HIV testing: M<strong>en</strong> ................................................................ 192Table 13.10 Pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> couns<strong>el</strong>led and tested for HIV.............................................. 193Table 13.11 Male circumcision .......................................................................................... 194Table 13.12 S<strong>el</strong>f-reported preval<strong>en</strong>ce of sexually-transmitted infections (STIs) and STIssymptoms ....................................................................................................... 195Table 13.13 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS and of a source of condomsamong youth .................................................................................................. 196Table 13.14 Age at first sexual intercourse among youth .................................................... 198Table 13.15 Condom use at first sexual intercourse among youth ....................................... 200Table 13.16 Premarital sexual intercourse and condom use during premarital sexualintercourse among youth ................................................................................ 201Table 13.17.1 Higher-risk sexual intercourse among youth and condom use at lasthigher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months: Wom<strong>en</strong> ................................... 203Table 13.17.2 Higher-risk sexual intercourse among youth and condom use at lasthigher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months: M<strong>en</strong> ......................................... 204Table 13.18 Age-mixing in sexual r<strong>el</strong>ationships among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 .......................... 205Table 13.19 Drunk<strong>en</strong>ness during sexual intercourse among youth ...................................... 206Table 13.20 Rec<strong>en</strong>t HIV tests among youth ........................................................................ 207Tables and Figures | xiii


Figure 13.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tion Methods: Wom<strong>en</strong> ............................ 176Figure 13.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tion Methods: M<strong>en</strong> .................................. 176Figure 13.3 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive Knowledge about AIDS .......................................................... 179Figure 13.4 Accepting Attitudes towards Those with HIV: Wom<strong>en</strong> .................................... 183Figure 13.5 Accepting Attitudes towards Those with HIV: M<strong>en</strong> ......................................... 185Figure 13.6 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive Knowledge about AIDS and Source of Condomsamong Youth .................................................................................................. 197Figure 13.7 Age at First Sexual Intercourse among Youth ................................................... 199Figure 13.8 Abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, Being Faithful and Condom Use (ABC) among Young Wom<strong>en</strong>and M<strong>en</strong> ......................................................................................................... 205CHAPTER 14 HIV PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORSTable 14.1 Coverage of HIV testing by resid<strong>en</strong>ce and region ............................................ 211Table 14.2 Coverage of HIV testing by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics ...................... 212Table 14.3 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by age .................................................................................... 213Table 14.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by age .................................................................... 214Table 14.5 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by socioeconomic characteristics ........................................... 216Table 14.6 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by demographic characteristics .............................................. 218Table 14.7 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by sexual behaviour ............................................................... 219Table 14.8 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among young people by background characteristics ............... 221Table 14.9 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among young people by sexual behaviour ............................. 222Table 14.10 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by other characteristics .......................................................... 223Table 14.11 Prior HIV testing by curr<strong>en</strong>t HIV status ............................................................ 224Table 14.12 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by male circumcision ............................................................. 225Table 14.13 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among couples ...................................................................... 226Figure 14.1 Coverage of HIV Testing by G<strong>en</strong>der ................................................................ 210Figure 14.2 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Age Group and Sex ........................................................... 214Figure 14.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among Wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 ............................................ 215Figure 14.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among M<strong>en</strong> 15-49 ................................................. 215Figure 14.5 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by G<strong>en</strong>der and Province ........................................................ 217CHAPTER 15 WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT AND DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTHOUTCOMESTable 15.1 Employm<strong>en</strong>t and cash earnings of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> ............ 230Table 15.2.1 Control over wom<strong>en</strong>’s cash earnings and r<strong>el</strong>ative magnitude of wom<strong>en</strong>’searnings: Wom<strong>en</strong> ........................................................................................... 231Table 15.2.2 Control over m<strong>en</strong>’s cash earnings .................................................................... 232Table 15.3 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s control over her own earnings and over those of her husband ......... 233Table 15.4.1 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making ..................................................... 233Table 15.4.2 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making according to m<strong>en</strong> ......................... 234Table 15.5.1 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making by background characteristics ....... 235Table 15.5.2 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitude toward wives’ participation in decision-making ........................ 236Table 15.6.1 Attitude toward wife beating: Wom<strong>en</strong> ............................................................ 237Table 15.6.2 Attitude toward wife beating: M<strong>en</strong> ................................................................. 238Table 15.7 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward a husband’s rights wh<strong>en</strong> his wife refuses to havesexual intercourse ........................................................................................... 240Table 15.8 Indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t ............................................................. 241Table 15.9 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by wom<strong>en</strong>’s status ............................................. 242xiv | Tables and Figures


Table 15.10 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> and unmet needfor family planning .......................................................................................... 243Table 15.11 Reproductive health care by wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t ..................................... 244Figure 15.1 Number of Decisions in Which Wom<strong>en</strong> Participate ........................................ 234CHAPTER 16 GENDER-BASED VIOLENCETable 16.1 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce ...................................................................... 248Table 16.2 Persons committing physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce ............................................................. 249Table 16.3 Force at sexual initiation ................................................................................. 249Table 16.4 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce ......................................................................... 250Table 16.5 Persons committing sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce ................................................................ 251Table 16.6 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of differ<strong>en</strong>t forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce ........................................................ 251Table 16.7 Degree of marital control exercised by husbands ............................................ 252Table 16.8 Forms of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce ............................................................................... 254Table 16.9 Spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce by background characteristics............................................... 256Table 16.10 Spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband’s characteristics and empowerm<strong>en</strong>t indicators ... 257Table 16.11 Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce among those who report viol<strong>en</strong>ce ................... 259Table 16.12 Injuries to wom<strong>en</strong> due to spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce ..................................................... 260Table 16.13 Viol<strong>en</strong>ce by wom<strong>en</strong> against their spouse ......................................................... 261Table 16.14 H<strong>el</strong>p seeking to stop viol<strong>en</strong>ce ......................................................................... 263Table 16.15 Sources from where h<strong>el</strong>p was sought .............................................................. 264Table 16.16 Knowledge and preval<strong>en</strong>ce of female circumcision ......................................... 265Table 16.17 Age at circumcision ........................................................................................ 266Table 16.18 Person performing circumcisions among wom<strong>en</strong> by resid<strong>en</strong>ce ........................ 267Table 16.19 B<strong>en</strong>efits of circumcision .................................................................................. 267Table 16.20 Attitudes about female circumcision ............................................................... 268Figure 16.1 Domestic Viol<strong>en</strong>ce ......................................................................................... 254CHAPTER 17 ADULT AND MATERNAL MORTALITYTable 17.1 Data on siblings .............................................................................................. 270Table 17.2 Adult mortality rates ....................................................................................... 271Table 17.3 Maternal mortality .......................................................................................... 273Figure 17.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Adult Mortality, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1996-2002 and 2002-2008 ......................... 272APPENDIX A SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATIONTable A.1 Sample implem<strong>en</strong>tation: wom<strong>en</strong> .................................................................... 283Table A.2 Sample implem<strong>en</strong>tation: m<strong>en</strong> ......................................................................... 284Table A.3 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> by social anddemographic characteristics ............................................................................ 285Table A.4 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed m<strong>en</strong> by social anddemographic characteristics ............................................................................ 286Table A.5 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> by sexual behaviourcharacteristics ................................................................................................. 287Table A.6 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed m<strong>en</strong> by sexual behaviourcharacteristics ................................................................................................. 288Tables and Figures | xv


APPENDIX BESTIMATES OF SAMPLING ERRORSTable B.1 List of s<strong>el</strong>ected variables for sampling errors, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09 .......................... 292Table B.2 Sampling Errors for K<strong>en</strong>ya ............................................................................... 293Table B.3 Sampling Errors for Urban ............................................................................... 294Table B.4 Sampling Errors for Rural ................................................................................ 295Table B.5 Sampling Errors for Nairobi ............................................................................. 296Table B.6 Sampling Errors for C<strong>en</strong>tral Province ............................................................... 297Table B.7 Sampling Errors for Coast Province .................................................................. 298Table B.8 Sampling Errors for Eastern Province ............................................................... 299Table B.9 Sampling Errors for Nyanza Province .............................................................. 300Table B.10 Sampling Errors for Rift Valley Province ........................................................... 301Table B.11 Sampling Errors for Western Province ............................................................. 302Table B.12 Sampling Errors for North Eastern Province ..................................................... 303APPENDIX C DATA QUALITYTable C.1 Household age distribution ............................................................................. 305Table C.2.1 Age distribution of <strong>el</strong>igible and interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> ........................................ 306Table C.2.2 Age distribution of <strong>el</strong>igible and interviewed m<strong>en</strong> ............................................ 306Table C.3 Complet<strong>en</strong>ess of reporting .............................................................................. 307Table C.4 Births by cal<strong>en</strong>dar years .................................................................................. 307Table C.5 Reporting of age at death in days .................................................................... 308Table C.6 Reporting of age at death in months ............................................................... 309Table C.7 Nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> ........................................................................... 310xvi | Tables and Figures


FOREWORDThe primary objective of the 2008-09 KDHS, like its predecessors, is to provide up-to-dateinformation for policymakers, planners, researchers, and programme managers. This informationguides the planning, implem<strong>en</strong>tation, monitoring, and evaluation of population and healthprogrammes in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Specifically, the survey collects data on the following: fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s,marriage, sexual activity, fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces, awar<strong>en</strong>ess and use of family planning methods,breastfeeding practices, nutritional status of wom<strong>en</strong> and young childr<strong>en</strong>, childhood and maternalmortality, maternal and child health, malaria and use of mosquito nets, domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce, awar<strong>en</strong>essand behaviour regarding HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce among adults.The results of the curr<strong>en</strong>t survey pres<strong>en</strong>t evid<strong>en</strong>ce of a resumption of the fertility declineobserved in the 1980s and the 1990s in K<strong>en</strong>ya. The total fertility rate (TFR) of 4.6 childr<strong>en</strong> perwoman is the lowest rate ever recorded for K<strong>en</strong>ya. This decline in fertility could be attributed to anincrease in the proportion of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> using contraception, which rose from 7 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 1978 to 46 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Survey results also indicate a resumption in the decline of childhood mortality. The underfive-mortalityrate decreased to 74 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2008-09, down from 115 deaths in2003, while the infant mortality rate was 52 deaths per 1,000 live births, down from 77 deathsreported in 2003. The improvem<strong>en</strong>t in child survival is corroborated by increases in child vaccinationcoverage, in ownership and use of mosquito bednets, and in ant<strong>en</strong>atal care coverage, all of which havebe<strong>en</strong> shown to reduce child mortality. Overall, 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months are fullyvaccinated, and only three perc<strong>en</strong>t have not received any vaccines. Use of mosquito nets is consideredto be one of the strongest strategies in the fight against malaria. The survey found that 61 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofhouseholds own at least one mosquito net (treated or untreated), and 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t report owning at leastone insecticide-treated net (ITN). Fifty-one perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years and 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofpregnant wom<strong>en</strong> slept under a mosquito net the night prior to the interview. The results also indicatethat 9 in 10 mothers visited a health professional at least once for ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for the most rec<strong>en</strong>tbirth in the five-year period preceding the survey. These tr<strong>en</strong>ds and a plethora of other importantfindings imply that the deterioration in the quality of life among the K<strong>en</strong>yan population se<strong>en</strong> in earliersurveys has be<strong>en</strong> reversed.The K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) wishes to acknowledge the contributions ofthe various ag<strong>en</strong>cies and institutions that culminated in the compilation of the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>yaDemographic and Health Survey (KDHS). The survey was conducted in close collaboration with theNational Public Health Laboratory Services (NPHLS), the National Coordinating Ag<strong>en</strong>cy forPopulation and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCAPD), the K<strong>en</strong>ya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), theNational AIDS Control Council (NACC), ICF Macro, the United Nations Fund for PopulationActivities (UNFPA), the United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’s Fund (UNICEF), and the United States Ag<strong>en</strong>cyfor International Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (USAID). These institutions provided technical, administrative, andlogistical support to the process, for which we are exceedingly grateful. Special thanks go to staff ofthe K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, National AIDSControl Council (NACC), National Coordinating Ag<strong>en</strong>cy for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCAPD),and K<strong>en</strong>ya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) who coordinated the survey. Lastly, we acknowledgethe financial support provided by USAID, UNFPA, the World Bank, and UNICEF.Foreword | xvii


SUMMARY OF FINDINGSThe 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic andHealth Survey (KDHS) is a nationally repres<strong>en</strong>tativesample survey of 8,444 wom<strong>en</strong> age 15 to49 and 3,465 m<strong>en</strong> age 15 to 54 s<strong>el</strong>ected from400 sample points (clusters) throughout K<strong>en</strong>ya.It is designed to provide data to monitor thepopulation and health situation in K<strong>en</strong>ya as afollow-up to the 1989, 1993, 1998, and 2003KDHS surveys. The survey utilised a two-stagesample based on the 1999 Population and HousingC<strong>en</strong>sus and was designed to produce separateestimates for key indicators for each of theeight provinces in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Data collection tookplace over a three-month period, from 13 November2008 to late February 2009.The survey obtained detailed information onfertility lev<strong>el</strong>s, marriage, sexual activity, fertilityprefer<strong>en</strong>ces, awar<strong>en</strong>ess and use of family planningmethods, breastfeeding practices, nutritionalstatus of wom<strong>en</strong> and young childr<strong>en</strong>,childhood and maternal mortality, maternal andchild health, and awar<strong>en</strong>ess and behaviour regardingHIV/AIDS. The survey also includedcollection information on ownership and use ofmosquito nets, domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and HIV testingof adults.The 2008-09 KDHS was implem<strong>en</strong>ted bythe K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)in collaboration with the Ministry of PublicHealth and Sanitation (including the NationalAIDS and STIs Control Programme-NASCOP),the Ministry of Medical Services, the Ministry ofG<strong>en</strong>der, the K<strong>en</strong>ya Medical Research Institute(KEMRI), the National Coordinating Ag<strong>en</strong>cy forPopulation Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCAPD), and the NationalAIDS Control Council (NACC). The NationalPublic Health Laboratory Services assistedin recruitm<strong>en</strong>t and training of the health fi<strong>el</strong>dworkers, supported the voluntary couns<strong>el</strong>lingand testing of respond<strong>en</strong>ts, and implem<strong>en</strong>ted theHIV testing in the laboratory. Technical assistancewas provided through the internationalMEASURE DHS programme at ICF Macro andNCAPD. Financial support for the survey wasprovided by the Governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya and theU.S. Ag<strong>en</strong>cy for International Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t(USAID), the United Nations Population Fund(UNFPA), and the United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’sFund (UNICEF).FERTILITYFertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s and Tr<strong>en</strong>ds. One of themost important findings from the 2008-09KDHS is that fertility rates—which had stagnatedin the late 1990s—have declined somewhat.The total fertility rate of 4.6 childr<strong>en</strong> perwoman for the three-year period preceding thesurvey (2006-2008) is lower than the rate of 4.9derived from the 2003 KDHS and the rate of 5.0from the 1999 Population and Housing C<strong>en</strong>sus.Fertility Differ<strong>en</strong>tials. There are substantialdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces in fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s throughout K<strong>en</strong>ya.The total fertility rate is considerably higher inthe rural areas (5.2 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman) than inthe urban areas (2.9 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman). Regionaldiffer<strong>en</strong>ces are also marked. Fertility islowest in Nairobi province (2.8 childr<strong>en</strong> perwoman) and highest in North Eastern province(5.9 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman). Fertility in C<strong>en</strong>tralprovince is also r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y low (3.4), comparedwith Western (5.6) and Nyanza (5.4) provinces.Education of wom<strong>en</strong> is strongly associatedwith low fertility. The total fertility rate (TFR)decreases dramatically from 6.7 for wom<strong>en</strong> withno education to 3.1 for wom<strong>en</strong> with at leastsome secondary education. Over time, fertilityhas actually increased among wom<strong>en</strong> with noeducation and has only declined among thosewith primary incomplete education.Unplanned Fertility. Despite a r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>yhigh lev<strong>el</strong> of contraceptive use, the 2008-09KDHS data indicate that unplanned pregnanciesare common in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Overall, 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofbirths in K<strong>en</strong>ya are unwanted, while 26 perc<strong>en</strong>tare mistimed (wanted later). Overall, the proportionof births considered unwanted has decreasedslightly, compared with the 2003 KDHS, whilethe proportion mistimed has hardly changed atall.Summary of Findings | xix


Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces. There have be<strong>en</strong>some changes in fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces since 2003.The proportion of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> whowant another child soon has declined slightly(from 16 to 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t), as has the proportionwho want another child later in life (from 29 to27 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong>who either want no more childr<strong>en</strong> or who havebe<strong>en</strong> sterilised increased from 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003to 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The mean ideal familysize among curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> has declinedfrom 4.3 to 4.0.FAMILY PLANNINGKnowledge of Contraception. Knowledgeof family planning is nearly universal, with 95perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> and 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age15 to 49 knowing at least one modern method offamily planning. Among all wom<strong>en</strong>, the mostwid<strong>el</strong>y known methods of family planning aremale condoms, injectables, and pills, with about89 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> saying that they knowthese methods. Around 6 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> haveheard of female sterilisation, the IUD, implants,and the female condom. With regard to traditionalmethods, about two-thirds of wom<strong>en</strong> haveheard of the rhythm method, and just under halfknow about withdrawal, while folk methods arethe least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be m<strong>en</strong>tioned.There has be<strong>en</strong> little change in lev<strong>el</strong>s ofknowledge of contraceptive methods among allwom<strong>en</strong> since 2003. The lev<strong>el</strong> of knowledge offemale and male sterilisation and of the IUD hasdeclined since 2003, while knowledge of implantsand withdrawal has increased slightly.Use of Contraception. Slightly less thanhalf of married wom<strong>en</strong> (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in K<strong>en</strong>ya areusing a method of family planning. Most areusing a modern method (39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of marriedwom<strong>en</strong>), but 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t use a traditional method.Injectables are by far the most commonly usedcontraceptive method; they are used by 22 perc<strong>en</strong>tof married wom<strong>en</strong>, while pills are used by 7perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>, and female sterilisation andperiodic abstin<strong>en</strong>ce are each used by 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofmarried wom<strong>en</strong>.Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Contraceptive Use. Contraceptiveuse has increased since 2003, from 39 to 46perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>. Betwe<strong>en</strong> 2003 and2008-09, use of modern methods increased from32 to 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>, while use oftraditional methods over the same time periodactually decreased from 8 to 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of marriedwom<strong>en</strong>. The 2008-09 KDHS corroboratestr<strong>en</strong>ds in method mix, nam<strong>el</strong>y, a continuing increasein use of injectables and decrease in useof the pill as was the case in earlier KDHS surveys.Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in Contraceptive Use. As expected,contraceptive use increases with lev<strong>el</strong> ofeducation. Use of any method increases from 14perc<strong>en</strong>t among married wom<strong>en</strong> with no educationto 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> with at leastsome secondary education. Urban wom<strong>en</strong> (53perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use contraceptionthan rural wom<strong>en</strong> (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Source of Modern Methods. In K<strong>en</strong>ya,public (governm<strong>en</strong>t) facilities provide contraceptivesto more than half (57 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of modernmethod users, while 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t are suppliedthrough private medical sources, and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>tare supplied through other sources.Contraception Discontinuation. Overall,more than one in three wom<strong>en</strong> (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t) discontinueuse within 12 months of adopting amethod. The 12-month discontinuation rates forinjectables (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and periodic abstin<strong>en</strong>ce(33 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are lower than the rates for the pill(43 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and for the male condom (59 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Unmet Need for Family Planning. Onequarterof curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>yahave an unmet need for family planning, whichremains unchanged since 2003. Unmet need isev<strong>en</strong>ly split betwe<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> who want to waittwo or more years before having their next child(spacers) and those who want no more childr<strong>en</strong>(limiters).MATERNAL HEALTHAnt<strong>en</strong>atal Care. The 2008-09 KDHS dataindicate that 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya receiveant<strong>en</strong>atal care from a medical professional,either from doctors (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t) or nurses ormidwives (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The 2008-09 data indicatea slight increase since 2003 in medical ant<strong>en</strong>atalcare coverage, from 88 perc<strong>en</strong>t to 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Just over half of wom<strong>en</strong> (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t) receivedtwo or more tetanus toxoid injections dur-xx | Summary of Findings


ing pregnancy for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth in thefive years preceding the survey, slightly higherthan the 52 perc<strong>en</strong>t lev<strong>el</strong> in 2003. Taking intoaccount previous injections, almost three in fourbirths are protected against tetanus.D<strong>el</strong>ivery Care. Proper medical att<strong>en</strong>tion andhygi<strong>en</strong>ic conditions during d<strong>el</strong>ivery can reducethe risk of serious illness among mothers andtheir babies. The 2008-09 KDHS found that twoout of five births (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are d<strong>el</strong>ivered in ahealth facility, while 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t are d<strong>el</strong>ivered athome. This repres<strong>en</strong>ts a slight improvem<strong>en</strong>t inthe proportion of births occurring at a health facility,from 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 43 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2008-09.Similarly, 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births in K<strong>en</strong>ya ared<strong>el</strong>ivered under the supervision of a health professional,mainly a nurse or midwife. Traditionalbirth att<strong>en</strong>dants continue to play a vital role ind<strong>el</strong>ivery, assisting with 28 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births.R<strong>el</strong>atives and fri<strong>en</strong>ds assist in 21 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofbirths. The proportion of births assisted bymedically trained personn<strong>el</strong> increased slightlysince 2003. Only 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births are d<strong>el</strong>iveredby Caesarean section, a slight increase since2003.Maternal Mortality. Data on the survival ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts’ sisters were used to calculate a maternalmortality ratio for the 10-year period beforethe survey, which was estimated as 488 maternaldeaths per 100,000 live births. This is statisticallyinsignificantly differ<strong>en</strong>t from the rate of414 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births forthe t<strong>en</strong>-year period prior to the 2003 KDHSThus, it is impossible to say with confid<strong>en</strong>ce thatmaternal mortality has changed.CHILD HEALTHChildhood Mortality. Data from the 2008-09 KDHS show remarkable declines in childmortality lev<strong>el</strong>s compared with the 2003 survey.Comparing data for the five-year period beforeeach survey, under-five mortality has declinedfrom 115 to 74 deaths per 1,000 births, whileinfant mortality has dropped from 77 to 52deaths per 1,000 live births.Childhood Vaccination Coverage. In the2008-09 KDHS, mothers were able to show ahealth card with immunisation data for 70 perc<strong>en</strong>tof childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months. Accordingly,estimates of coverage are based on both datafrom health cards and mothers’ recall. The datashow that 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> 12-23 monthsare fully vaccinated against the major childhoodillnesses. Only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> 12-23months have not received any of the recomm<strong>en</strong>dedimmunisations. These results repres<strong>en</strong>tan improvem<strong>en</strong>t in immunisation coverage forchildr<strong>en</strong> since 2003 wh<strong>en</strong> only 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months were fully immunised.Child Illness and Treatm<strong>en</strong>t. Among childr<strong>en</strong>under five years of age, 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t were reportedto have had symptoms of acute respiratoryillness in the two weeks preceding the survey,24 perc<strong>en</strong>t had a fever in the two weekspreceding the survey, and 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t had diarrhoea.Around half of childr<strong>en</strong> with symptoms ofacute respiratory illness, fever, or diarrhoea weretak<strong>en</strong> to a health facility or provider for treatm<strong>en</strong>t.For example, 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> withdiarrhoea were tak<strong>en</strong> to a facility for treatm<strong>en</strong>t,while 78 perc<strong>en</strong>t were giv<strong>en</strong> either a solutionprepared from oral rehydration salt (ORS) packetsor increased fluids.NUTRITIONBreastfeeding Practices. Breastfeeding isnearly universal in K<strong>en</strong>ya; 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong>are breastfed. The median duration of breastfeedingis 21 months, similar to the durationdocum<strong>en</strong>ted in the 2003 KDHS. The 2008-09KDHS data indicate that complem<strong>en</strong>tary feedingof childr<strong>en</strong> begins early. For example, amongnewborns less than two months of age, 24 perc<strong>en</strong>tare receiving complem<strong>en</strong>tary foods or liquidsother than water. The median duration ofexclusive breastfeeding is estimated at less thanone month.Bottle-feeding is common in K<strong>en</strong>ya; 25 perc<strong>en</strong>tof childr<strong>en</strong> under 6 months are fed with bottleswith teats. Neverth<strong>el</strong>ess, use of infant formulamilk is minimal; only a tiny fraction ofchildr<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ow six months receive commerciallyproduced infant formula.Intake of Vitamin A. Ensuring that childr<strong>en</strong>betwe<strong>en</strong> six months and 59 months receive<strong>en</strong>ough vitamin A may be the single most effectivechild survival interv<strong>en</strong>tion, since defici<strong>en</strong>ciesin this micronutri<strong>en</strong>t can cause blindnessand can increase the severity of infections suchSummary of Findings | xxi


as measles and diarrhoea. Overall, 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> age 6-35 months consumed vitamin A-rich foods in the day before the survey, and 30perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-59 months received avitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t in the six months precedingthe survey.Nutritional Status of Childr<strong>en</strong>. Surveydata show that the nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong>under five has improved only slightly in the pastfew years. At the national lev<strong>el</strong>, 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> under five are stunted (low height-forage),while 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> are wasted (lowweight-for-height) and 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t are underweight(low weight-for-age).Nutritional Status of Wom<strong>en</strong>. The meanbody mass index (BMI) for wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 is23, id<strong>en</strong>tical to what it was in 2003.MALARIAThe country has witnessed an impressiverise in household ownership of insecticidetreatedmosquito nets (ITNs). The 2008-09KDHS shows that 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households haveat least one ITN, up from 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded inthe 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya Malaria Indicator Survey and 6perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded in the 2003 KDHS.Just under half of childr<strong>en</strong> under five (47perc<strong>en</strong>t) were reported to have slept under anITN the night before the survey, compared withonly five perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. The 2008-09 KDHSdata show that 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>slept under an ITN the night before the survey,and 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t received intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tivetreatm<strong>en</strong>t with antimalarial medication duringant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits.Among childr<strong>en</strong> with fever in the two weekspreceding the survey, 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t were giv<strong>en</strong> therecomm<strong>en</strong>ded medicine, ACT, while 3 perc<strong>en</strong>twere giv<strong>en</strong> the second-line drug, sulfadoxinepyrimethamineor SP. Only about half of childr<strong>en</strong>receive these drugs within a day of the onsetof the fever.HIV/AIDSAwar<strong>en</strong>ess of AIDS. Almost all K<strong>en</strong>yanwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> (more than 99 perc<strong>en</strong>t) haveheard of AIDS. More than 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>and m<strong>en</strong> indicate that the chances of getting theAIDS virus can be reduced by limiting sex toone faithful partner. Similarly, 75 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> and 81 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 knowthat using condoms can reduce the risk of contractingthe HIV virus. As expected, the proportionof both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who know that abstainingfrom sex reduces the chances of gettingthe AIDS virus is high—88 perc<strong>en</strong>t amongwom<strong>en</strong> and 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t among m<strong>en</strong>.Almost 9 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> (87 perc<strong>en</strong>t)know that HIV can be transmitted by breastfeeding,and 7 in 10 know that the risk of maternalto-childtransmission can be reduced by themother taking certain drugs during pregnancy.Ninety perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 are aware that a healthy-looking personcan have the AIDS virus.Attitudes towards HIV-Infected People.Large majorities of K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> (90and 94 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y) express a willingnessto care for a r<strong>el</strong>ative sick with AIDS in theirown household, while far fewer (68 and 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y) say they would be willing tobuy fresh vegetables from a v<strong>en</strong>dor who has theAIDS virus. Survey results further indicate that76 and 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y,b<strong>el</strong>ieve that a female teacher who has theAIDS virus should be allowed to continue teachingin school. Finally, 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and69 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> say that if a member of theirfamily got infected with the virus that causesAIDS, they would not necessarily want it to remaina secret.HIV-R<strong>el</strong>ated Behavioural Indicators.Comparison of data from the 2008-09 KDHSwith similar data from the 2003 KDHS indicatesthat there has be<strong>en</strong> a slight increase in the age atfirst sexual experi<strong>en</strong>ce. The median age at firstsex has increased from 17.8 to 18.2 amongwom<strong>en</strong> age 20-49 and 17.1 to 17.6 among m<strong>en</strong>aged 20-54. Since the most important mechanismof HIV transmission is sexual intercourse,it is important to know the ext<strong>en</strong>t of multiplesexual partners. The 2008-09 KDHS data showthat only 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofm<strong>en</strong> report having had more than one sexualpartner in the 12 months prior to the survey.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce. In the one-half of thehouseholds s<strong>el</strong>ected for the man’s survey, allwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who were interviewed wereasked to voluntarily provide some drops of bloodfor HIV testing in the laboratory. Results indi-xxii | Summary of Findings


cate that 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan adults age 15-49are infected with HIV, only slightly lower thanthe lev<strong>el</strong> of 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t measured in the 2003KDHS and the 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya AIDS Indicator Survey(KAIS). HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t amongwom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t among m<strong>en</strong> 15-49. The peak preval<strong>en</strong>ce among wom<strong>en</strong> is at age40-44 (14 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while preval<strong>en</strong>ce among m<strong>en</strong>is highest at age 35-39 (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Patterns of HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce. The HIV epidemicshows regional heterog<strong>en</strong>eity. Nyanzaprovince has an overall preval<strong>en</strong>ce of 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t,double the lev<strong>el</strong> of the next highest provinces—Nairobi and Western, at 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t each. All otherprovinces have lev<strong>el</strong>s betwe<strong>en</strong> 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 5perc<strong>en</strong>t overall, except North Eastern provincewhere the preval<strong>en</strong>ce is about 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t. HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce is by far the highest among wom<strong>en</strong>who are widowed (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Both wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong> who are divorced or separated also haver<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y high HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce (17 and 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Survey findings indicate thatthere is a strong r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce and male circumcision; 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofm<strong>en</strong> who are uncircumcised are HIV infectedcompared with 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those who are circumcised.Among couples who are married orliving together, 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t are discordant, withone partner infected and the other uninfected.get drunk oft<strong>en</strong> compared with those whose husbandsdo not drink.Attitudes Towards Marital Viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Togauge the acceptability of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce,wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> interviewed in the 2008-09KDHS were asked whether they thought a husbandwould be justified in hitting or beating hiswife in each of the following five situations: ifshe burns the food; if she argues with him; if shegoes out without t<strong>el</strong>ling him; if she neglects thechildr<strong>en</strong>; and if she refuses to have sexual r<strong>el</strong>ationswith him. Results show that 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofK<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> and 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> agree thatat least one of these factors is suffici<strong>en</strong>t justificationfor wife beating.Female G<strong>en</strong>ital Cutting. Survey data showthat there has be<strong>en</strong> a gradual decline in the proportionof K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> who are circumcised,from 38 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1998 to 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003and to 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.GENDER-RELATED VIOLENCEViol<strong>en</strong>ce Since Age 15. In the 2008-09KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked if they had experi<strong>en</strong>cedviol<strong>en</strong>ce since age 15. The data show that39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> have experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>cesince they were 15 and one in four reported experi<strong>en</strong>cingviol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months precedingthe survey. The main perpetrators are husbands,and to a lesser ext<strong>en</strong>t, teachers, mothers, fathers,and brothers.Marital Viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Thirty perc<strong>en</strong>t of evermarriedwom<strong>en</strong> report having experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotionalviol<strong>en</strong>ce by husbands, 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t reportphysical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t report sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce. Almost half (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of evermarriedwom<strong>en</strong> report suffering emotional,physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, while 10 perc<strong>en</strong>thave experi<strong>en</strong>ced all three forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce bytheir curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband. The factormost strongly r<strong>el</strong>ated to marital viol<strong>en</strong>ce is husband’salcohol use; viol<strong>en</strong>ce is 2-3 times morepreval<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> who say their husbandsSummary of Findings | xxiii


MAP OF KENYA BY PROVINCESUDANETHIOPIAEASTERNUGANDARIFT VALLEYNORTH EASTERNSOMALIAWESTERNNYANZACENTRALNAIROBITANZANIACOAST³0 70 140 280 KilometersSource:1999 K<strong>en</strong>ya Population C<strong>en</strong>susxxiv | Map of K<strong>en</strong>ya


INTRODUCTION 1Collins Opiyo, Christopher Omolo, and Macdonald Obudho1.1 GEOGRAPHY, HISTORY, AND THE ECONOMY1.1.1 GeographyK<strong>en</strong>ya is situated in the eastern part of the African contin<strong>en</strong>t. The country lies betwe<strong>en</strong> 5degrees north and 5 degrees south latitude and betwe<strong>en</strong> 24 and 31 degrees east longitude. It is almostbisected by the equator. K<strong>en</strong>ya is bordered by Ethiopia (north), Somalia (northeast), Tanzania (south),Uganda and Lake Victoria (west), and Sudan (northwest). It is bordered on the east by the IndianOcean. The 536-kilometre coastline, which contains swamps of East African mangroves and the portin Mombasa, <strong>en</strong>ables the country to trade easily with other countries.The country is divided into 8 provinces and 158 districts (as of the 2009 Population andHousing C<strong>en</strong>sus). It has a total area of 582,646 square kilometres of which 571,466 square kilometresform the land area. Approximat<strong>el</strong>y 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the land area of the country is arid or semiarid, andonly 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t is arable. The country has diverse physical features, including the Great Rift Valley,which runs from north to south; Mount K<strong>en</strong>ya, the second highest mountain in Africa; Lake Victoria,the largest freshwater lake on the contin<strong>en</strong>t; Lake Nakuru, a major tourist attraction because of itsflamingos; Lake Magadi, famous for its soda ash; a number of rivers, including Tana, Athi, Yala,Nzoia, and Mara; and numerous wildlife reserves containing thousands of differ<strong>en</strong>t animal species.The country falls into two regions: lowlands, including the coastal and Lake Basin lowlands,and highlands, which ext<strong>en</strong>d on both sides of the Great Rift Valley. Rainfall and temperatures areinflu<strong>en</strong>ced by altitude and proximity to lakes or the ocean. The climate along the coast is tropical withrainfall and temperatures being higher throughout the year. There are four seasons in a year: a dryperiod from January to March, the long rainy season from March to May, followed by a long dry sp<strong>el</strong>lfrom May to October, and th<strong>en</strong> the short rains betwe<strong>en</strong> October and December.1.1.2 HistoryK<strong>en</strong>ya is a former British colony. The indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce process was met with resistance and anarmed struggle by K<strong>en</strong>yans against the British colonial rulers. The Mau Mau reb<strong>el</strong>lion in the 1950spaved the way for constitutional reform and political dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t in the following years. The countryachieved s<strong>el</strong>f-rule in June 1963 and gained indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce (Uhuru) on December 12, 1963. Exactly oneyear later, K<strong>en</strong>ya became a republic. The country was a multiparty state until 1981, wh<strong>en</strong> the r<strong>el</strong>evantparts of the constitution were am<strong>en</strong>ded to create a one-party state. However, in the early 1990s, thecountry reverted to a multiparty state. From indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce until December 2002, the country wasruled by the K<strong>en</strong>ya African National Union (KANU). During the 2002 g<strong>en</strong>eral <strong>el</strong>ections, the NationalAlliance of Rainbow Coalition asc<strong>en</strong>ded to power through a landslide victory. Curr<strong>en</strong>tly, the countryis run by a coalition governm<strong>en</strong>t that brings together the Party of National Unity (PNU) and theOrange Democratic Movem<strong>en</strong>t (ODM).Various ethnic groups are distributed throughout the country. The major tribes includeKikuyu, Luo, Kal<strong>en</strong>jin, Luhya, Kamba, Kisii, Mijik<strong>en</strong>da, Somali, and Meru. In K<strong>en</strong>ya, English is usedas the official language, and Kiswahili is the national language. The main r<strong>el</strong>igions in the country areChristianity and Islam.Introduction | 1


1.1.3 EconomyThe K<strong>en</strong>yan economy is predominantly agricultural with a strong industrial base. There hasbe<strong>en</strong> a gradual decline in the share of the gross domestic product (GDP) attributed to agriculture, fromover 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t during the period 1964-1979 to 25 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2000-2002. The agricultural sectordirectly contributed 22 and 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the GDP in 2007 and 2008 respectiv<strong>el</strong>y. Coffee, tea, andhorticulture (flowers, fruits, and vegetables) are the main agricultural export commodities; in 2008,these three commodities jointly accounted for 45 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the total export earnings (K<strong>en</strong>ya NationalBureau of Statistics, 2009). The manufacturing sector contributes significantly to export earnings,especially from the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) region. Themanufacturing sector has increased slightly from about 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the GDP in 1964-1973 to 11perc<strong>en</strong>t of the GDP in 2008.The performance of the K<strong>en</strong>yan economy since the country became indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t has be<strong>en</strong>mixed. In the first decade after the country’s indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce, the economy grew an average of 7 perc<strong>en</strong>tper annum, with the growth attributed to expansion in the manufacturing sector and an increase inagricultural production. Since th<strong>en</strong>, there has be<strong>en</strong> a consist<strong>en</strong>t decline in the economy, which reachedits lowest GDP growth lev<strong>el</strong> of about 0.2 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2000. The consist<strong>en</strong>tly poor growth performancehas failed to keep pace with population growth. The weak performance has be<strong>en</strong> caused by externalshocks and internal structural problems, including the drought of the 1980s, low commodity prices,world recession, bad weather, and poor infrastructure. The poor growth of the economy hascontributed to deterioration in the overall w<strong>el</strong>fare of the K<strong>en</strong>yan population. Similarly, the economyhas be<strong>en</strong> unable to create jobs at a rate to match the rising labour force.To reverse the tr<strong>en</strong>d of decline, the governm<strong>en</strong>t prepared the Economic Recovery Strategy(ERS) for Wealth and Employm<strong>en</strong>t Creation in 2003 with the objectives of restoring economicgrowth and creating employm<strong>en</strong>t and social dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. During implem<strong>en</strong>tation from 2003 to 2007,the ERS evolved a four-pillar strategy to meet the following objectives:• Restoring economic growth within the context of a sustainable macroeconomicframework• Str<strong>en</strong>gth<strong>en</strong>ing the institutions of governance• Restoring and expanding the infrastructure• Investing in human capitalThe ERS <strong>en</strong>abled the economy to grow steadily from 0.5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2002 to 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007.One of the lessons learned through the implem<strong>en</strong>tation of the ERS was that employm<strong>en</strong>t creation isthe most effective strategy for halting increasing poverty. In 2008, the governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya launchedVision 2030 and its Medium Term Plan (MTP) to provide continuity by consolidating the gains madeunder the ERS. The goal was to transform K<strong>en</strong>ya into a newly industrialized middle-income countryby 2030.After remarkable growth, which averaged 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the period 2004-2007 and peaked at7.1 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007, real GDP growth slowed to 1.7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008. The slowdown resulted fromboth domestic and external shocks, including post-<strong>el</strong>ection viol<strong>en</strong>ce, high food and fu<strong>el</strong> prices,drought, and the global financial crisis. These shocks had a negative impact on key sectors of theeconomy, including tourism, manufacturing, transport, and agriculture. They weak<strong>en</strong>ed the country’sbalance of paym<strong>en</strong>ts position.These factors damp<strong>en</strong>ed prospects for growth in 2009 and beyond. Specifically, the slow andfragile recovery in more advanced countries is lik<strong>el</strong>y to continue to lower demand for K<strong>en</strong>ya’s mainexports and to reduce earnings from tourism, remittances, and private capital flows. On the domesticfront, while the short rains have h<strong>el</strong>ped to reduce the magnitude of shortages of food, water, and2 | Introduction


<strong>en</strong>ergy, the negative effects of climate change are lik<strong>el</strong>y to wors<strong>en</strong> unless d<strong>el</strong>iberate and appropriatepolicy measures are tak<strong>en</strong> to reverse <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>tal degradation.1.2 POPULATIONK<strong>en</strong>ya’s population was 10.9 million in 1969, and by 1999 it had almost tripled to 28.7million (C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics, 1994, 2001a) (see Table 1.1). The country’s population isprojected to reach 39.4 million in 2009. Results of previous c<strong>en</strong>suses indicate that the annualpopulation growth rate was 2.9 perc<strong>en</strong>t per year during the 1989-1999 period, down from 3.4 perc<strong>en</strong>treported for the 1979-1989 inter-c<strong>en</strong>sal period. Curr<strong>en</strong>tly, growth is estimated to be about 2.8perc<strong>en</strong>t. The decline in population growth is a realisation of the efforts called for by the NationalPopulation Policy for Sustainable Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t,2000) and is a result of the decline in fertility rates over rec<strong>en</strong>t decades. Fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s have declinedfrom 8.1 births per woman in the late 1970s to the curr<strong>en</strong>t lev<strong>el</strong> of 4.6 births per woman. The declinein fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s is expected to be manifested in the age distribution of the country’s population.Mortality rates also have ris<strong>en</strong> since the 1980s, presumably due to increased deaths from theHIV/AIDS epidemic, deterioration of health services, and widespread poverty (National Council forPopulation and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t, 2000). The crude birth rate increased from 50 births per 1,000population in 1969 to 54 per 1,000 in 1979 but thereafter declined to 48 and 41 per 1,000 in 1989 and1999, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y. The crude death rate increased from 11 per 1,000 population in 1979-1989 to 12per 1,000 for the 1989-1999 period. The infant mortality rate, which had steadily decreased from 119deaths per 1,000 live births in 1969 to 88 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1979, and th<strong>en</strong> to 66 deathsper 1,000 live births in 1989, increased briefly in 1999 to 77 per 1,000 but th<strong>en</strong> resumed its decline in2009.Table 1.1 Basic demographic indicatorsS<strong>el</strong>ected demographic indicators for K<strong>en</strong>ya, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, and 2009Indicator 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009Population (millions) 10.9 16.2 23.2 28.7 39.4 aD<strong>en</strong>sity (pop./km 2 ) 19.0 27.0 37.0 49.0 67.7 aPerc<strong>en</strong>t urban 9.9 15.1 18.1 19.4 21.0 aCrude birth rate 50.0 54.0 48.0 41.3 34.8 bCrude death rate 17.0 14.0 11.0 11.7 uInter-c<strong>en</strong>sal growth rate 3.3 3.8 3.4 2.9 2.8 aTotal fertility rate 7.6 7.8 6.7 5.0 4.6 bInfant mortality rate (per 1,000 births) 119 88 66 77.3 52.0 bLife expectancy at birth 50 54 60 56.6 58.9 aaRevised projection figuresbKDHS results (see later chapters)u = unknownSource: CBS, 1970; CBS, 1981; CBS, 1994; CBS, 2002a1.3 POPULATION AND FAMILY PLANNING POLICIES AND PROGRAMMESOwing to its high fertility and declining mortality, K<strong>en</strong>ya is characterised by a youthfulpopulation. Projections show about 43 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the population is younger than 15 years (CBS,2006). This implies that over three-fifths of K<strong>en</strong>ya’s population, or about 25 million people in 2009,are less than 25 years old. Consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, K<strong>en</strong>ya faces the formidable chall<strong>en</strong>ge of providing its youthwith opportunities for a safe, healthy, and economically productive future. The 1994 InternationalConfer<strong>en</strong>ce on Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (ICPD) <strong>en</strong>dorsed the right of adolesc<strong>en</strong>ts and youngadults to obtain the highest lev<strong>el</strong>s of health care. In line with the ICPD recomm<strong>en</strong>dations, K<strong>en</strong>ya hasput in place an Adolesc<strong>en</strong>t Reproductive Health and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t policy (ARH&D). Broadly, thepolicy addresses the following adolesc<strong>en</strong>t reproductive health issues and chall<strong>en</strong>ges: adolesc<strong>en</strong>t sexualhealth and reproductive rights; harmful practices, including early marriage, female g<strong>en</strong>ital cutting, andg<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce; drug and substance abuse; socioeconomic factors; and the special needs ofadolesc<strong>en</strong>ts and young people with disabilities (Odini, 2008).Introduction | 3


The Ministry of Health (MOH) formally approved and adopted the National ReproductiveHealth Policy with the theme: ‘Enhancing the Reproductive Health Status for all K<strong>en</strong>yans’. Thepolicy provides a framework for equitable, effici<strong>en</strong>t, and effective d<strong>el</strong>ivery of quality reproductivehealth services throughout the country and emphasises reaching those in greatest need who are mostvulnerable. Its aim is to guide planning, standardisation, implem<strong>en</strong>tation, and monitoring andevaluation of reproductive health care provided by various stakeholders. The new policy will allowthe governm<strong>en</strong>t to incorporate and address key issues such as security of reproductive healthcommodities, prev<strong>en</strong>tion of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, emerg<strong>en</strong>cy obstetric care,adolesc<strong>en</strong>t reproductive health issues, g<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce, reproductive health needs of personswith disabilities, and integration of reproductive and HIV health care (Health Policy Initiative, 2009).This policy emphasises priority actions for the achievem<strong>en</strong>t of the ICPD goals and the Mill<strong>en</strong>niumDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goals (MDGs) of improving maternal health, reducing neonatal and child mortality,reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS, and achieving wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and g<strong>en</strong>der equality.Attainm<strong>en</strong>t of sexual and reproductive health and rights will have positive effects on povertyreduction and reduction of infant mortality, maternal mortality, and new cases of HIV/AIDS. A keychall<strong>en</strong>ge to attainm<strong>en</strong>t of the MDGs will be str<strong>en</strong>gth<strong>en</strong>ing the health system by building the capacityto manage programmes and addressing critical bottl<strong>en</strong>ecks, especially a shortage of skilled healthworkers, an inadequate budget for the health sector, poor procurem<strong>en</strong>t and supply systems, and othercritical managem<strong>en</strong>t problems (Division of Reproductive Health, 2005).In 2000, the governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya launched the National Population Policy for SustainableDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t, 2000). This policy builds on thestr<strong>en</strong>gth of K<strong>en</strong>ya’s first national population policy outlined in Sessional Paper No. 4 of 1984 onPopulation Policy Guid<strong>el</strong>ines. The curr<strong>en</strong>t policy—whose implem<strong>en</strong>tation period <strong>en</strong>ds in 2010—outlines ways to implem<strong>en</strong>t the programme of action dev<strong>el</strong>oped at the 1994 International Confer<strong>en</strong>ceon Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t in Cairo, Egypt. The implem<strong>en</strong>tation of this policy is being guided bynational and district plans of action. The policy also addresses the issues of <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t, g<strong>en</strong>der, andpoverty, as w<strong>el</strong>l as the problems facing certain segm<strong>en</strong>ts of the K<strong>en</strong>yan population, such as its youth.Goals of the population policy include the following:• Improvem<strong>en</strong>t of the standard of living and quality of life• Improvem<strong>en</strong>t of the health and w<strong>el</strong>fare of the people through provision of informationand education on how to prev<strong>en</strong>t illness and premature deaths among risk groups,especially among mothers and childr<strong>en</strong>• Sust<strong>en</strong>ance of the ongoing demographic transition to further reduce fertility and mortality,especially infant and child mortality• Continuing motivation and <strong>en</strong>couragem<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yans to adhere to responsiblepar<strong>en</strong>thood• Promotion of stability of the family, taking into account equality of opportunity for familymembers, especially the rights of wom<strong>en</strong> and childr<strong>en</strong>• Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and the improvem<strong>en</strong>t of their status in all spheres of life and<strong>el</strong>imination of all forms of discrimination, especially against the girl child• Sustainability of the population programme• Elimination of retrogressive sociocultural practices through education.The policy has the following targets, some of which have be<strong>en</strong> achieved according to the curr<strong>en</strong>tKDHS results:• Reduction of the infant mortality rate (deaths per 1,000 live births) from 71 in 1998 to 67by 2005 and to 63 by 2010• Reduction of the under-five mortality rate (deaths per 1,000 live births) from 112 in 1998to 104 by 2005 and to 98 by 2010• Reduction of the maternal mortality rate (deaths per 100,000 live births) from 590 in 1998to 230 by 2005 and to 170 by 2010• Maint<strong>en</strong>ance of the crude death rate at 12 per 1,000 population up to the year 2000 andreduction to 10 by 2005 and to 9 by 20104 | Introduction


• Minimisation of the decline in life expectancy at birth for both sexes, from age 58 in 1995to age 53 in 2010;• Stabilisation of the population growth rate at 2.1 perc<strong>en</strong>t per year by 2010.1.4 HEALTH PRIORITIES AND PROGRAMMESThe major health care providers in K<strong>en</strong>ya are the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitationand the Ministry of Medical Services. These two ministries operate more than half of all healthfacilities in the country. The public d<strong>el</strong>ivery system is organised in a traditional pyramidal structure.First-lev<strong>el</strong> care is provided at disp<strong>en</strong>saries and medical clinics. The next lev<strong>el</strong> comprises healthc<strong>en</strong>tres and sub-district hospitals. Third-lev<strong>el</strong> care is provided at district hospitals and provincialg<strong>en</strong>eral hospitals. There are two national hospitals—Moi Referral and Teaching Hospital in Eldoretand K<strong>en</strong>yatta National Hospital in Nairobi. Resources for health are scarce, and the disease burd<strong>en</strong> ishigh in the country, just as in other countries in the region (Gl<strong>en</strong>ngård, A.H. and T.M. Maina, 2007)Making adequate health care services universally available requires striking a d<strong>el</strong>icate balancebetwe<strong>en</strong> a population’s health needs and available resources. It also requires the equitable andeffici<strong>en</strong>t allocation of resources. Without proper health care financing strategies, no governm<strong>en</strong>t canhope to successfully meet the health needs of its citiz<strong>en</strong>s. In 1989, the K<strong>en</strong>yan governm<strong>en</strong>t introducedcost sharing in an effort to bridge the growing gap betwe<strong>en</strong> health sector exp<strong>en</strong>ses and availableresources. Since th<strong>en</strong>, the governm<strong>en</strong>t has strived to achieve a mix of health care financing strategiesand systems that will <strong>en</strong>able the country to provide its citiz<strong>en</strong>s with universal access to adequate basichealth services (Health Policy Initiative, 2009).Since attaining indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce, the governm<strong>en</strong>t has prioritized the improvem<strong>en</strong>t of the healthstatus of K<strong>en</strong>yans. It recognises that good health is a prerequisite to socioeconomic dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. Anumber of governm<strong>en</strong>t policy docum<strong>en</strong>ts and successive national dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t plans have stated thatthe provision of health services should meet the basic needs of the population, place health serviceswithin easy reach of K<strong>en</strong>yans, and emphasize prev<strong>en</strong>tive, promotive, and rehabilitative serviceswithout ignoring curative services. Perhaps as a result of these policies, both infant mortality and lifeexpectancy at birth, which are basic indicators of health status, have improved significantly (Ngigiand Macharia, 2006).The second National Health Sector Strategic Plan (NHSSP II) by the MOH aims to reversethe downward tr<strong>en</strong>ds in health indicators observed during the years of the first strategic plan (NHSSPI, 1999–2004), while applying the lessons learned and searching for innovative solutions. NHSSP IIre-invigorates the K<strong>en</strong>ya Health Policy Framework <strong>el</strong>aborated in 1994. The health goals formulated inthe framework underlined the need to pursue the principles of primary health care to improve thehealth status of the K<strong>en</strong>yan population.The K<strong>en</strong>ya Health Policy Framework set the following strategic imperatives:1. Ensure equitable allocation of governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya resources to reduce disparities inhealth status.2. Increase cost-effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess and effici<strong>en</strong>cy of resource allocation and use.3. Manage population growth.4. Enhance the regulatory role of the governm<strong>en</strong>t in health care provision.5. Create an <strong>en</strong>abling <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t for increased private sector and community involvem<strong>en</strong>tin service provision and financing.6. Increase and diversify per capita financial flows to the health sector.Introduction | 5


The policies that the governm<strong>en</strong>t has pursued over the years have had a direct impact onimproving the health status of K<strong>en</strong>yans. Despite a decline in economic performance, cumulative gainshave be<strong>en</strong> made in the health sector as evid<strong>en</strong>ced by the improvem<strong>en</strong>t in the basic health indicators(Odini, 2008).1.5 STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK TO COMBAT THE HIV/AIDS EPIDEMICTo meet the chall<strong>en</strong>ge of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the country, in September 1997, thegovernm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya approved Sessional Paper No. 4 on AIDS in K<strong>en</strong>ya. The governm<strong>en</strong>t clearlyint<strong>en</strong>ded to support effective programmes to control the spread of AIDS, to protect the human rightsof those with HIV or AIDS, and to provide care for those infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. Thegoal set forth by the paper is to ‘provide a policy framework within which AIDS prev<strong>en</strong>tion andcontrol efforts will be undertak<strong>en</strong> for the next 15 years and beyond’. Specifically, it has the followingobjectives:• Give direction on how to handle controversial issues while taking into account prevailingcircumstances and the sociocultural <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t• Enable the governm<strong>en</strong>t to play the leadership role in AIDS prev<strong>en</strong>tion and controlactivities (Chall<strong>en</strong>ges posed by AIDS call for a multisectoral approach, necessitatinginvolvem<strong>en</strong>t from a diversity of actors)• Recomm<strong>en</strong>d an appropriate institutional framework for effective managem<strong>en</strong>t andcoordination of HIV/AIDS programme activitiesThe sessional paper recognises that responding effectiv<strong>el</strong>y to the HIV/AIDS crisis will requirea strong political commitm<strong>en</strong>t at the highest lev<strong>el</strong>; implem<strong>en</strong>tation of a multisectoral prev<strong>en</strong>tion andcontrol strategy focused on young people; mobilisation of resources for financing HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion,care, and support; and establishm<strong>en</strong>t of a National AIDS Control Council (NACC) to provid<strong>el</strong>eadership at the highest lev<strong>el</strong>.K<strong>en</strong>ya is experi<strong>en</strong>cing a mixed and geographically heterog<strong>en</strong>eous HIV epidemic. Itscharacteristics are those of both a g<strong>en</strong>eralised epidemic among the mainstream population and aconc<strong>en</strong>trated epidemic among the most at risk population. The HIV epidemic affects all sectors of theeconomy. It is equally a dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>tal and an epidemiological chall<strong>en</strong>ge, <strong>en</strong>compassingid<strong>en</strong>tification and dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t of a series of appropriate sectoral responses and their applications atthe local lev<strong>el</strong>. Nationally, most new infections (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t) occur in couples who <strong>en</strong>gage inheterosexual activity within a union or regular partnership (National AIDS Control Council, 2009).M<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> who <strong>en</strong>gage in casual sex contribute 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the new infections, while sexworkers and their cli<strong>en</strong>ts account for 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t. M<strong>en</strong> who have sex with m<strong>en</strong> and prison populationscontribute 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t, and injecting drug users account for 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Health facility-r<strong>el</strong>ated infectionscontribute 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of new cases. The NACC launched the third K<strong>en</strong>ya National AIDS Strategic Plan(KNASP III) in 2009 to address the chall<strong>en</strong>ges posed by HIV infection. The KNASP III aims toachieve K<strong>en</strong>ya’s universal access targets for quality integrated services at all lev<strong>el</strong>s to prev<strong>en</strong>t newHIV infections, reduce HIV-r<strong>el</strong>ated illnesses and deaths, and mitigate the effects of the epidemic onhouseholds and communities (National AIDS Control Council, 2009).1.6 OBJECTIVES OF THE SURVEYThe 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) is a population and healthsurvey that K<strong>en</strong>ya conducts every five years. It was designed to provide data to monitor thepopulation and health situation in K<strong>en</strong>ya and also to be used as a follow-up to the previous KDHSsurveys in 1989, 1993, 1998, and 2003.From the curr<strong>en</strong>t survey, information was collected on fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s; marriage; sexualactivity; fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces; awar<strong>en</strong>ess and use of family planning methods; breastfeeding practices;nutritional status of wom<strong>en</strong> and young childr<strong>en</strong>; childhood and maternal mortality; maternal and child6 | Introduction


health; and awar<strong>en</strong>ess and behaviour regarding HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections.The 2008-09 KDHS is the second survey to collect data on malaria and the use of mosquito nets,domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and HIV testing of adults.The specific objectives of the 2008-09 KDHS were to:• Provide data, at the national and provincial lev<strong>el</strong>s, that allow the derivation ofdemographic rates, particularly fertility and childhood mortality rates, to be used toevaluate the achievem<strong>en</strong>ts of the curr<strong>en</strong>t national population policy for sustainabledev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t• Measure changes in fertility and contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>ce use and study the factors thataffect these changes, such as marriage patterns, desire for childr<strong>en</strong>, availability ofcontraception, breastfeeding habits, and other important social and economic factors• Examine the basic indicators of maternal and child health in K<strong>en</strong>ya, including nutritionalstatus, use of ant<strong>en</strong>atal and maternity services, treatm<strong>en</strong>t of rec<strong>en</strong>t episodes of childhoodillness, use of immunisation services, use of mosquito nets, and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> andpregnant wom<strong>en</strong> for malaria• Describe the patterns of knowledge and behaviour r<strong>el</strong>ated to the transmission ofHIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections• Estimate adult and maternal mortality ratios at the national lev<strong>el</strong>• Ascertain the ext<strong>en</strong>t and pattern of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce and female g<strong>en</strong>ital cutting in thecountry• Estimate the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV infection at the national and provincial lev<strong>el</strong>s and byurban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce, and use the data to corroborate the rates from the s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong>surveillance systemThe 2008-09 KDHS information provides data to assist policymakers and programmeimplem<strong>en</strong>ters as they monitor and evaluate existing programmes and design new strategies fordemographic, social, and health policies in K<strong>en</strong>ya. The data will be useful in many ways, includingthe monitoring of the country’s achievem<strong>en</strong>t of the Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goals.As in 2003, the 2008-09 KDHS survey was designed to cover the <strong>en</strong>tire country, including thearid and semi-arid districts, and especially those areas in the northern part of the country that were notcovered in the earlier KDHS surveys. The survey collected information on demographic and healthissues from a sample of wom<strong>en</strong> at the reproductive age of 15-49 and from a sample of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54years in a one-in-two subsample of households.1.7 SURVEY ORGANISATIONThe K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) implem<strong>en</strong>ted the 2008-09 KDHS incollaboration with the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, including the National AIDS andSTIs Control Programme (NASCOP), the Ministry of Medical Services, the Ministry of G<strong>en</strong>der, theK<strong>en</strong>ya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), the National Coordinating Ag<strong>en</strong>cy for PopulationDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCAPD), and the National AIDS Control Council (NACC). The National PublicHealth Laboratory Services assisted in recruitm<strong>en</strong>t and training of the health fi<strong>el</strong>d workers, supportedthe voluntary couns<strong>el</strong>ling and testing of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who wanted to know their HIV status, andimplem<strong>en</strong>ted the HIV testing in the laboratory. As in the previous surveys, technical assistance wasprovided through the international MEASURE DHS programme at ICF Macro. This is a projectsponsored by the United States Ag<strong>en</strong>cy for International Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (USAID) to carry outpopulation and health surveys in dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries.Introduction | 7


Financial support for the KDHS was provided by the governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya, the U.S.Governm<strong>en</strong>t (USAID), UNICEF, and UNFPA. UNICEF provided vehicles and drivers for use in thearid and semi-arid lands (ASAL) districts.1.8 SAMPLE DESIGNThe survey is household-based, and therefore the sample was drawn from the populationresiding in households in the country. A repres<strong>en</strong>tative sample of 10,000 households was drawn forthe 2008-09 KDHS. This sample was constructed to allow for separate estimates for key indicators foreach of the eight provinces in K<strong>en</strong>ya, as w<strong>el</strong>l as for urban and rural areas separat<strong>el</strong>y. Compared withthe other provinces, fewer households and clusters were surveyed in North Eastern province becauseof its sparse population. A d<strong>el</strong>iberate attempt was made to oversample urban areas to get <strong>en</strong>ough casesfor analysis. As a result of these differing sample proportions, the KDHS sample is not s<strong>el</strong>f-weightingat the national lev<strong>el</strong>; consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, all tables except those concerning response rates are based onweighted data.The KNBS maintains master sampling frames for household-based surveys. The curr<strong>en</strong>t oneis the fourth National Sample Survey and Evaluation Programme (NASSEP IV), which wasdev<strong>el</strong>oped on the platform of a two-stage sample design. The 2008-09 KDHS adopted the samedesign, and the first stage involved s<strong>el</strong>ecting data collection points (‘clusters’) from the nationalmaster sample frame. A total of 400 clusters—133 urban and 267 rural—were s<strong>el</strong>ected from themaster frame. The second stage of s<strong>el</strong>ection involved the systematic sampling of households from anupdated list of households. The Bureau dev<strong>el</strong>oped the NASSEP frame in 2002 from a list of<strong>en</strong>umeration areas covered in the 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. A number of clusters wereupdated for various surveys to provide a more accurate s<strong>el</strong>ection of households. Included were someof the 2008-09 KDHS clusters that were updated prior to s<strong>el</strong>ection of households for the datacollection.All wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 years who were either usual resid<strong>en</strong>ts or visitors pres<strong>en</strong>t in sampledhouseholds on the night before the survey were <strong>el</strong>igible to be interviewed in the survey. In addition, inevery second household s<strong>el</strong>ected for the survey, all m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 years were also <strong>el</strong>igible to beinterviewed. All wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> living in the households s<strong>el</strong>ected for the M<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire and<strong>el</strong>igible for the individual interview were asked to voluntarily give a few drops of blood for HIVtesting.1.9 QUESTIONNAIRESThree questionnaires were used to collect the survey data: the Household, Wom<strong>en</strong>’s, andM<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaires. The cont<strong>en</strong>ts of these questionnaires were based on mod<strong>el</strong> questionnairesdev<strong>el</strong>oped by the MEASURE DHS programme that underw<strong>en</strong>t only slight adjustm<strong>en</strong>ts to reflectr<strong>el</strong>evant issues in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Adjustm<strong>en</strong>t was done through a consultative process with all the r<strong>el</strong>evanttechnical institutions, governm<strong>en</strong>t ag<strong>en</strong>cies, and local and international organisations. The threequestionnaires were th<strong>en</strong> translated from English into Kiswahili and 10 other local languages(Kal<strong>en</strong>jin, Kamba, Kikuyu, Kisii, Luhya, Luo, Maasai, Meru, Mijik<strong>en</strong>da, and Somali). Thequestionnaires were further refined after the pretest and training of the fi<strong>el</strong>d staff.In each of the sampled households, the Household Questionnaire was the first to beadministered and was used to list all the usual members and visitors. Basic information was collectedon the characteristics of each person listed, including age, sex, education, and r<strong>el</strong>ationship to the headof the household. The main purpose of the Household Questionnaire was to id<strong>en</strong>tify wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 who were <strong>el</strong>igible for the individual interviews. The questionnaire also collectedinformation on characteristics of the household’s dw<strong>el</strong>ling unit, such as the source of water, type oftoilet facilities, materials used for the floor, walls, and roof of the house, ownership of various durablegoods, ownership of agricultural land, ownership of domestic animals, and ownership and use ofmosquito nets. In addition, this questionnaire was used to capture information on height and weight8 | Introduction


measurem<strong>en</strong>ts of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 years and childr<strong>en</strong> age five years and b<strong>el</strong>ow, and, in households<strong>el</strong>igible for collection of blood samples, to record the respond<strong>en</strong>ts’ cons<strong>en</strong>t to voluntarily give bloodsamples. A detailed description of HIV testing procedures is giv<strong>en</strong> in Section 1.10 b<strong>el</strong>ow.The Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire was used to capture information from all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49years and covered the following topics:• Respond<strong>en</strong>t’s background characteristics (e.g., education, resid<strong>en</strong>tial history, mediaexposure)• Reproductive history• Knowledge and use of family planning methods• Ant<strong>en</strong>atal, d<strong>el</strong>ivery, and postnatal care• Breastfeeding• Immunisation, nutrition, and childhood illnesses• Fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces• Husband’s background characteristics and woman’s work• Marriage and sexual activity• Infant and child feeding practices• Childhood mortality• Awar<strong>en</strong>ess and behaviour about HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases• Knowledge of tuberculosis• Health insurance• Adult and maternal mortality• Domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce• Female g<strong>en</strong>ital cuttingThe set of questions on domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce sought to obtain information on wom<strong>en</strong>’sexperi<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The questions were administered to one woman per household. In householdswith more <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong>, special procedures (use of a ‘Kish grid’) were followed to <strong>en</strong>sure that thewoman interviewed about domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce was randomly s<strong>el</strong>ected.The M<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire was administered to all m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 years living in every secondhousehold in the sample. The M<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire collected information similar to that collected inthe Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire, but it was shorter because it did not contain questions on reproductivehistory, maternal and child health, nutrition, maternal mortality, and domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce.Two pilot projects were conducted in 12 districts for the KDHS, the first from July 1-7, 2008,and the second from October 13-17, 2008, to test the questionnaires, which were writt<strong>en</strong> in Englishand th<strong>en</strong> translated into <strong>el</strong>ev<strong>en</strong> other languages. The pilot was repeated because the first pilot did notinclude the HIV blood testing compon<strong>en</strong>t. Tw<strong>el</strong>ve teams (one for each language) were formed, eachwith one female interviewer, one male interviewer, and one health worker. A total of 260 householdswere covered in the pilots. The lessons learnt from the pilot surveys were used to finalise the surveyinstrum<strong>en</strong>ts and set up strong, logistical arrangem<strong>en</strong>ts to <strong>en</strong>sure the success of the survey.1.10 HIV TESTINGAs was done in the previous KDHS, in all households s<strong>el</strong>ected for the M<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire,all <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who were interviewed were asked to voluntarily provide some drops ofblood for HIV testing. The protocol for blood specim<strong>en</strong> collection and analysis was based on theanonymous linked protocol dev<strong>el</strong>oped by the DHS programme and was revised and <strong>en</strong>hanced byKEMRI and NACC. It was reviewed and approved by the Sci<strong>en</strong>tific and Ethical Review Committeeof KEMRI. The protocol allowed for the linking of the HIV results to the sociodemographic datacollected in the individual questionnaires, provided that the information that could pot<strong>en</strong>tially id<strong>en</strong>tifyan individual was destroyed before the linking took place. This required that id<strong>en</strong>tification codes beIntroduction | 9


d<strong>el</strong>eted from the data file and that the part of the Household Questionnaire containing the barcod<strong>el</strong>ab<strong>el</strong>s and names of respond<strong>en</strong>ts be destroyed prior to merging the HIV results with the individualdata file.Considerable care was necessary to prepare respond<strong>en</strong>ts for the blood sample, and for thisreason, two health workers were assigned to each of the 23 survey teams. They were recruited throughthe Ministry of Public Health. To obtain informed cons<strong>en</strong>t for taking blood for HIV testing, the healthworker explained the procedures, the confid<strong>en</strong>tiality of the data, and the fact that test results could notbe traced back to or made available to the subject. For those who were interested in knowing theirHIV status, the health worker provided information about how they could obtain it through voluntarycouns<strong>el</strong>ling and testing (VCT) services. If cons<strong>en</strong>t was granted, the health worker th<strong>en</strong> collected adried blood spot (DBS) sample on a filter paper card from a finger prick, using a single-use, springloaded,sterile lancet. Each DBS sample was giv<strong>en</strong> a barcode lab<strong>el</strong>, with a duplicate lab<strong>el</strong> attached tothe Household Questionnaire on the line showing cons<strong>en</strong>t for that respond<strong>en</strong>t. The health workeraffixed a third copy of the same barcode lab<strong>el</strong> to a Blood Sample Transmittal Form in order to trackthe blood samples from the fi<strong>el</strong>d to the laboratory. Filter papers were dried overnight in a plasticdrying box after which the health worker packed them in individual Ziploc bags with desiccant and ahumidity indicator card and placed them in a larger Ziploc bag with other blood spots for thatparticular cluster. Blood samples were periodically collected in the fi<strong>el</strong>d along with the completedquestionnaires and transported to KNBS headquarters in Nairobi for logging in, after which they weretak<strong>en</strong> to the National Public Health Laboratory Services headquarters in Nairobi for HIV testing.At the laboratory, the DBS samples were each assigned a laboratory number and kept froz<strong>en</strong>until testing was started in early June 2009. After the samples were allowed to attain roomtemperature, hole punches were used to cut a circle at least 6.3 mm in diameter. The blots were placedin cryo-vials that contained 200 µl of <strong>el</strong>ution PBS buffer and were lab<strong>el</strong>led with the laboratorynumber. The vials were left to <strong>el</strong>ute overnight at 4°C, th<strong>en</strong> they were c<strong>en</strong>trifuged at 2,500 rpm for 10minutes. These <strong>el</strong>uates were th<strong>en</strong> tested with a Vironostika Anti-HIV-1/2 Plus <strong>en</strong>zyme-linkedimmunosorb<strong>en</strong>t assay (ELISA) test kit (DADE Behring HIV-1/2) for verification purposes. Allpositive samples and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t of negative samples were th<strong>en</strong> tested with a Murex HIV-1/2MicroELISA System. For quality assurance, all positive samples and a 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t random sample ofthe negative samples were retested at the KEMRI HIV laboratory using the same testing algorithm ofboth Vironostika and Murex MicroELISA systems. Finally, 30 discrepant samples were tested bypolymerase chain reaction (PCR) DNA at KEMRI laboratory.1.11 TRAININGKNBS recruited research assistants and supervisors in the month of October 2008 based on aset of qualifications and experi<strong>en</strong>ce, especially in past KDHSs or other health-r<strong>el</strong>ated sample surveys,such as the K<strong>en</strong>ya Aids Indicator (KAIS) Survey, the K<strong>en</strong>ya Malaria Indicator Survey (KMIS), andthe Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). The process brought on board a number of qualifiedpeople with the skills necessary to undertake the survey.Differ<strong>en</strong>t categories of personn<strong>el</strong> were recruited and trained to undertake the KDHS. Theseincluded 23 supervisors, 52 health workers, 92 female research assistants, 23 male research assistants,23 fi<strong>el</strong>d editors, 6 office editors, 4 quality assurance personn<strong>el</strong>, and 5 reserves.A three-week training course was conducted from October 21 to November 8 in Nakuru.Because of the large number of people involved, trainees were divided into five groups and trained inthree differ<strong>en</strong>t locations on questionnaire administration. They came together in pl<strong>en</strong>ary sessions forspecial lectures. Four trainers were assigned to each group. The trainers were officers of KNBS, theMinistry of Public Health, and NCAPD, as w<strong>el</strong>l as staff from ICF Macro. The training teamdev<strong>el</strong>oped a programme that allowed for some topics to be shared in pl<strong>en</strong>ary sessions while otherswere conducted in the smaller classes to allow for better explanation of technical details. In additionto the main regular trainers, guest lecturers gave pres<strong>en</strong>tations in pl<strong>en</strong>ary sessions on specialised10 | Introduction


topics such as family planning, anthropometric measurem<strong>en</strong>ts, HIV/AIDS, and K<strong>en</strong>ya’s VCTprogramme.The DHS standard approach to training was used, including class pres<strong>en</strong>tations, mockinterviews in class, and practice interviews in the fi<strong>el</strong>d. Participants were also giv<strong>en</strong> tips oninterviewing techniques. Three tests were giv<strong>en</strong> to h<strong>el</strong>p participants understand the survey conceptsand how to complete each of the three questionnaires. Anthropometric measurem<strong>en</strong>t was giv<strong>en</strong>special att<strong>en</strong>tion by inviting an expert who conducted training and also provided many hours ofdemonstrations and practical exercises to each group.A separate class was organised for the health workers. Staff from KEMRI and NACC trainedthe health workers on how to administer the cons<strong>en</strong>t procedures, how to take blood spots for HIVtesting, and how to minimise risks in handling blood products (‘universal precautions’).All trainees were tak<strong>en</strong> for practice interviews in households in s<strong>el</strong>ected areas in the town ofNakuru. Towards the <strong>en</strong>d of training, the final fi<strong>el</strong>d teams were formed and supervisors, <strong>en</strong>umerators,editors, and quality assurance personn<strong>el</strong> were id<strong>en</strong>tified. This was based on performance both in classand in the fi<strong>el</strong>d, as w<strong>el</strong>l as on the leadership skills displayed during training. Both supervisors andeditors were tak<strong>en</strong> through further training on how to supervise fi<strong>el</strong>dwork and edit questionnaires inthe fi<strong>el</strong>d.1.12 FIELDWORKFi<strong>el</strong>dwork started on 13 November 2008 and was completed in late February 2009. Each ofthe 23 fi<strong>el</strong>d teams was composed of one supervisor, one fi<strong>el</strong>d editor, four female interviewers, onemale interviewer, two health workers, two VCT couns<strong>el</strong>lors, and one driver. There were a few teamsthat had two vehicles and two drivers. Staff from KNBS and ICF Macro participated in fi<strong>el</strong>dsupervision.In r<strong>el</strong>ated surveys, many respond<strong>en</strong>ts expressed interest in learning their HIV status, so to<strong>en</strong>sure that this need would be met, the National AIDS Control Programme (NASCOP) <strong>en</strong>gaged aparall<strong>el</strong> team of two VCT couns<strong>el</strong>lors to work with each of the data collection teams. The mobileVCT teams followed the same protocol applied in fixed VCT sites, according to the NationalGuid<strong>el</strong>ines for Voluntary Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing for HIV (Ministry of Health, 2003). This includedpretest couns<strong>el</strong>ling of the cli<strong>en</strong>ts followed by anonymous testing for HIV for those requesting theservice. A finger prick was performed to collect drops of blood for simultaneous (parall<strong>el</strong>) testingperformed with two simple, rapid HIV test kits (Abbott Determine HIV 1/2 and Trinity Biotech Uni-Gold); for quality control, a dried blood spot filter paper was collected on every t<strong>en</strong>th cli<strong>en</strong>t for testingin the laboratory. During the 15 minutes while the test was dev<strong>el</strong>oping, prev<strong>en</strong>tion couns<strong>el</strong>ling wasprovided. If the two test results were discrepant, a third test (Instascre<strong>en</strong>) was performed as a‘tiebreaker’. Post-test couns<strong>el</strong>ling was th<strong>en</strong> provided.The s<strong>en</strong>sitivity of the survey required a good plan for social mobilisation in areas where thesurvey was conducted. NACC organised and implem<strong>en</strong>ted a series of mobilisation activities in theclusters sampled for the KDHS before the survey teams moved in to conduct interviews. This processappeared to have had a positive impact on the survey, lik<strong>el</strong>y contributing to the high response rates.NACC also printed a brochure on HIV/AIDS and VCT for the team’s health workers toprovide to all households and survey respond<strong>en</strong>ts. Similarly, numbered vouchers were printed and leftwith <strong>el</strong>igible respond<strong>en</strong>ts. The vouchers were to be giv<strong>en</strong> to the mobile VCT teams or the fixed VCTsite wh<strong>en</strong> the <strong>el</strong>igible respond<strong>en</strong>ts w<strong>en</strong>t for VCT. NASCOP also made arrangem<strong>en</strong>ts with the fixedVCT sites charging for services, so that they would provide free services to KDHS cli<strong>en</strong>ts. Finally,although the VCT teams were to give priority to cli<strong>en</strong>ts pres<strong>en</strong>ting the KDHS vouchers, they alsoaccepted any other cli<strong>en</strong>ts from the sampled communities.Introduction | 11


1.13 DATA PROCESSINGA data processing team was constituted and trained at the KNBS offices in Nyayo House inNairobi after the data collection teams started fi<strong>el</strong>dwork. This team was supported by technicalassistance from ICF Macro. Data processing comm<strong>en</strong>ced at the beginning of December 2008 and wasfinalised in early March 2009. Tabulation of the results was done by June 2009 by KNBS incollaboration with ICF Macro. Data processing for blood draws was d<strong>el</strong>ayed at the National HIVRefer<strong>en</strong>ce Laboratory to allow for completion of data cleaning and validation and to remove allpersonal id<strong>en</strong>tifiers from the stored questionnaires. The KDHS pr<strong>el</strong>iminary report was prepared andlaunched in November 2009.1.14 RESPONSE RATESA total of 9,936 households were s<strong>el</strong>ected in the sample, of which 9,268 were occupied at thetime of fi<strong>el</strong>dwork and thus <strong>el</strong>igible for interviews (Table 1.2). Of the <strong>el</strong>igible households, 9,057households were successfully interviewed, yi<strong>el</strong>ding a response rate of 98 perc<strong>en</strong>t. The shortfall in th<strong>en</strong>umber of households was larg<strong>el</strong>y due to structures that were found to be vacant or destroyed andhouseholds whose members were abs<strong>en</strong>t for an ext<strong>en</strong>ded period during data collection.From the households interviewed, 8,767 wom<strong>en</strong> were found to be <strong>el</strong>igible and 8,444 wereinterviewed, giving a response rate of 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Interviews with m<strong>en</strong> covered 3,465 of the <strong>el</strong>igible3,910 m<strong>en</strong>, yi<strong>el</strong>ding a response rate of 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t. The response rates are g<strong>en</strong>erally higher in rural thanin urban areas.The main reason for no response among both <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong> and <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> was the failureto find individuals at home despite repeated callbacks made to the household by the interviewers. Onsome occasions the interviewers would visit respond<strong>en</strong>ts at their work places without success. Th<strong>el</strong>ower response rates for m<strong>en</strong> are a result of their more frequ<strong>en</strong>t abs<strong>en</strong>ces from home.Table 1.2 Results of the household and individual interviewsNumber of households, number of interviews, and response rates, accordingto resid<strong>en</strong>ce (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-2009ResultResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban RuralTotalHousehold interviewsHouseholds s<strong>el</strong>ected 3,286 6,650 9,936Households occupied 3,015 6,253 9,268Households interviewed 2,910 6,147 9,057Household response rate 1 96.5 98.3 97.7Interviews with wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49Number of <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> 2,735 6,032 8,767Number of <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong>interviewed 2,615 5,829 8,444Eligible wom<strong>en</strong> response rate 2 95.6 96.6 96.3Interviews with m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54Number of <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong> 1,269 2,641 3,910Number of <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong>interviewed 1,084 2,381 3,465Eligible m<strong>en</strong> response rate 2 85.4 90.2 88.61 Households interviewed/households occupied2Respond<strong>en</strong>ts interviewed/<strong>el</strong>igible respond<strong>en</strong>ts12 | Introduction


HOUSEHOLD POPULATION AND HOUSINGCHARACTERISTICS 2John Bore and James Ng’ang’aThis chapter summarizes demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the population inthe households sampled in the 2008-09 KDHS. For the purpose of the 2008-09 KDHS, a householdwas defined as a person or a group of persons, r<strong>el</strong>ated or unr<strong>el</strong>ated, who live together and who share acommon source of food. The Household Questionnaire (see App<strong>en</strong>dix E) included a schedulecollecting basic demographic and socioeconomic information (e.g., age, sex, education attainm<strong>en</strong>t,and curr<strong>en</strong>t school att<strong>en</strong>dance) for all usual resid<strong>en</strong>ts and visitors who sp<strong>en</strong>t the night preceding theinterview in the household. This method of data collection allows analysis of the results for either thede jure (usual resid<strong>en</strong>ts) or de facto (those pres<strong>en</strong>t at the time of the survey) populations. Thehousehold questionnaire also obtained information on housing facilities (e.g., sources of water supplyand sanitation facilities) and household possessions.The information pres<strong>en</strong>ted in this chapter is int<strong>en</strong>ded to facilitate interpretation of the keydemographic, socioeconomic, and health indices pres<strong>en</strong>ted later in the report. It is also int<strong>en</strong>ded toassist in the assessm<strong>en</strong>t of the repres<strong>en</strong>tativ<strong>en</strong>ess of the survey sample.2.1 POPULATION BY AGE AND SEXAge and sex are important demographic variables and are the primary basis of demographicclassification. The distribution of the de facto household population in the 2008-09 KDHS is shown inTable 2.1 by five-year age groups, according to sex and resid<strong>en</strong>ce. The household populationconstitutes 38,019 persons, of which 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t are male and 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t are female. There are morepersons in the younger age groups than in the older age groups for both sexes, with those age 0-19accounting for more than half of the population.Table 2.1 Household population by age, sex, and resid<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of the de facto household population by five-year age groups, according to sex and resid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09AgeUrban Rural TotalMale Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total


Figure 2.1 illustrates the age-sex structure of the K<strong>en</strong>yan population in a population pyramid.As was the case in 2003, the household population age-sex structure is still wide at its base, asdepicted by the population pyramid. The share of the K<strong>en</strong>yan population under 15 years of age is45 perc<strong>en</strong>t; those age 15-64 constitute 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t, and those age 65 years and older make up 4 perc<strong>en</strong>tof the total K<strong>en</strong>yan household population. This means that the age dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy ratio in K<strong>en</strong>ya hasincreased slightly, from 92 in 2003 to 96 in 2008-09. 1The pyramid shows a rather sharp drop in population betwe<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> age 10-14 and thoseage 15-19. This may be partly due to a possible t<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy on the part of some interviewers to estimatethe ages of wom<strong>en</strong> to be under the cutoff age of 15 for <strong>el</strong>igibility for the individual interview, thusreducing their workload.Figure 2.1 Population PyramidAge group (years)80+0.50.475-790.30.370-740.60.565-690.70.660-641.0 10.955-591.21.050-541.61.345-49Female1.81.7Male40-442.12.035-392.52.330-343.22.825-294.043.220-244.73.915-194.95.110-147.16.75-97.37.9


Table 2.2 Household compositionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households by sex of head of householdand by household size (mean size of household), according toresid<strong>en</strong>ce), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09CharacteristicResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban RuralTotalHousehold headshipMale 71.4 64.2 66.1Female 28.6 35.8 33.9Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of usual members1 23.9 11.7 14.92 18.3 10.7 12.63 20.3 13.9 15.54 17.7 16.5 16.85 9.2 15.0 13.56 5.5 11.7 10.17 2.0 8.1 6.58 1.5 5.2 4.29+ 1.5 7.2 5.8Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Mean size of households 3.1 4.6 4.2Number of households 2,350 6,707 9,057Note: Table is based on de jure household members, i.e., usualresid<strong>en</strong>ts.2.3 EDUCATION OF THE HOUSEHOLD POPULATIONEducation is a key determinant of the lifestyle and status an individual <strong>en</strong>joys in a society.Studies have consist<strong>en</strong>tly shown that educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t has a strong effect on health behavioursand attitudes. Results from the 2008-09 KDHS can be used to look at educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t amonghousehold members and school att<strong>en</strong>dance ratios among youth.For the analysis pres<strong>en</strong>ted here, the official age for <strong>en</strong>try into the primary lev<strong>el</strong> is six years.The official duration of primary school is eight years (i.e., from standard 1 to standard 8), and th<strong>en</strong>umber of years assumed for completion of secondary school is four years.2.3.1 Educational Attainm<strong>en</strong>tTables 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 pres<strong>en</strong>t data on educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t of household members age sixand older for each sex. The data show a slight decrease in the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with noeducation (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t for wom<strong>en</strong> and 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t for m<strong>en</strong>) compared with the 2003 KDHS (23 perc<strong>en</strong>tfor wom<strong>en</strong> and 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t for m<strong>en</strong>). As expected, more m<strong>en</strong> have either completed secondary(12 perc<strong>en</strong>t) or attained more than secondary (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> who have completed secondary or attained more than secondary, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.Compared with the 2003 KDHS, there has be<strong>en</strong> a slight decrease in the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong>and young adults who have never att<strong>en</strong>ded school, particularly among those age 10-14 years and15-19 years.In most of the age groups, there are fewer m<strong>en</strong> than wom<strong>en</strong> who have no education at all, apattern that was observed in the 2003 KDHS. The gap betwe<strong>en</strong> the proportion of m<strong>en</strong> who have noeducation and wom<strong>en</strong> who have no education increases with age. For instance, in the 6-9 age group,male childr<strong>en</strong> are actually more lik<strong>el</strong>y than female childr<strong>en</strong> to have no education, while in the 65 andover age group, 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> have never be<strong>en</strong> to school, compared with only 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofm<strong>en</strong>.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 15


Table 2.3.1 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t of the female household populationPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of the de facto female household populations age six and over by highest lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded or completedand median grade completed, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNoeducationSomeprimaryCompletedprimary 1SomesecondaryCompletedsecondary 2More thansecondaryDon’tknow/missing Total NumberMedianyearscompletedAge6-9 39.7 60.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2,242 0.310-14 4.5 90.0 4.3 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 100.0 2,680 3.715-19 4.5 43.6 22.0 21.7 7.3 0.8 0.1 100.0 1,862 7.120-24 7.5 25.2 29.4 11.0 18.1 8.7 0.0 100.0 1,806 7.625-29 8.3 24.0 33.0 9.6 15.2 10.0 0.0 100.0 1,529 7.530-34 7.9 32.2 24.8 9.6 16.2 9.2 0.1 100.0 1,232 7.435-39 11.0 32.0 22.9 7.6 17.0 9.1 0.4 100.0 933 7.340-44 14.5 20.7 29.1 8.3 19.4 7.8 0.2 100.0 791 6.645-49 22.0 25.9 24.2 9.4 13.6 4.9 0.0 100.0 697 6.150-54 34.5 27.5 18.1 4.7 8.3 6.6 0.4 100.0 625 3.955-59 43.9 24.7 16.6 3.6 4.5 6.2 0.6 100.0 439 2.260-64 55.6 23.7 10.8 1.4 2.8 4.9 0.8 100.0 380 0.065+ 76.8 16.7 3.2 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.1 100.0 828 0.0Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 11.3 27.2 18.1 9.6 20.2 13.4 0.1 100.0 3,257 7.6Rural 21.3 47.3 16.7 6.5 5.7 2.2 0.2 100.0 12,805 4.5ProvinceNairobi 6.1 20.4 17.8 9.6 20.5 25.3 0.3 100.0 1,014 9.6C<strong>en</strong>tral 10.9 38.2 25.3 10.0 11.2 4.2 0.1 100.0 1,726 6.5Coast 33.1 36.8 13.1 5.3 8.5 3.2 0.0 100.0 1,265 3.4Eastern 20.8 45.9 17.3 6.5 6.6 2.7 0.3 100.0 2,847 4.5Nyanza 13.4 49.3 17.4 9.3 6.4 4.0 0.2 100.0 2,594 5.7Rift Valley 21.5 43.7 16.9 5.7 9.0 3.1 0.2 100.0 4,369 4.9Western 14.2 55.4 14.2 7.3 6.9 1.6 0.4 100.0 1,833 5.0North Eastern 69.6 23.9 2.4 1.4 1.6 1.0 0.1 100.0 413 0.0Wealth quintileLowest 40.2 46.5 9.5 2.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 100.0 3,089 1.5Second 20.0 55.0 15.8 5.6 3.1 0.3 0.2 100.0 3,154 4.2Middle 17.1 48.7 19.4 7.3 6.1 1.2 0.2 100.0 3,238 5.1Fourth 12.9 40.8 20.3 10.7 11.0 4.0 0.3 100.0 3,270 6.3Highest 7.5 26.0 19.7 9.4 21.4 15.9 0.1 100.0 3,310 7.8Total 19.3 43.2 17.0 7.2 8.7 4.5 0.2 100.0 16,061 5.2Note: Total includes 17 wom<strong>en</strong> whose age was not stated.1Completed Grade 8 at the primary lev<strong>el</strong>, for those under age 40; because of the change in the school system in the 1980s, those age 40and above are considered to have completed primary if they completed Grade 7.2Completed Form 4 at the secondary lev<strong>el</strong>About twice as many wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> in rural areas have no education at all compared withthose in urban areas. Although North Eastern province has the highest proportion of those withouteducation, a significant drop was observed betwe<strong>en</strong> 2003 and 2008-09 for both g<strong>en</strong>ders in theprovince. As expected, the proportion with no education decreases dramatically as wealth increases.Nationally, the median number of years of schooling completed is slightly higher for males(6.0 years) than females (5.2 years). Over the years, the median number of years of schoolingcompleted has be<strong>en</strong> increasing, although the increase has be<strong>en</strong> small. For example, the mediannumber of years of schooling increased from 4.3 in 2003 to 5.2 in 2008-09 for the female populationage 6 and above and from 5.0 in 2003 to 6.0 in 2008-09 for the male population.16 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


Table 2.3.2 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t of the male household populationPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of the de facto male household populations age six and over by highest lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded or completed andmedian grade completed, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNoeducationSomeprimaryCompletedprimary 1SomesecondaryCompletedsecondary 2More thansecondaryDon’tknow/missing Total NumberMedianyearscompletedAge6-9 42.9 56.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 100.0 2,453 0.210-14 4.9 91.5 2.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 2,557 3.615-19 1.6 49.4 18.4 23.7 6.5 0.4 0.1 100.0 1,952 6.920-24 3.2 22.6 26.3 13.6 23.9 10.2 0.1 100.0 1,472 8.025-29 4.1 23.8 26.2 9.4 23.3 13.2 0.1 100.0 1,226 7.830-34 4.4 24.2 28.8 7.1 22.1 13.1 0.2 100.0 1,067 7.735-39 4.0 22.4 25.2 9.1 27.5 11.7 0.1 100.0 863 8.040-44 6.0 14.8 31.1 6.5 26.1 15.3 0.1 100.0 774 7.845-49 7.9 18.7 30.9 6.3 24.1 12.0 0.1 100.0 629 6.950-54 12.6 18.6 30.5 9.5 18.9 9.5 0.4 100.0 476 6.755-59 13.9 22.2 26.5 7.9 17.5 10.6 1.3 100.0 378 6.760-64 21.4 18.6 27.0 9.5 11.6 11.4 0.5 100.0 347 6.765+ 39.6 33.5 12.3 3.4 6.4 4.6 0.2 100.0 678 2.3Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 6.8 24.3 16.2 9.0 23.9 19.5 0.3 100.0 2,997 8.8Rural 14.7 48.3 17.1 7.7 9.4 2.7 0.1 100.0 11,884 5.2ProvinceNairobi 4.6 16.9 12.7 7.4 27.0 31.1 0.4 100.0 1,002 11.1C<strong>en</strong>tral 5.3 41.8 23.7 9.1 14.7 5.3 0.1 100.0 1,568 6.7Coast 17.6 34.1 19.6 7.5 14.7 6.4 0.1 100.0 1,145 6.4Eastern 14.2 48.6 17.7 7.2 9.2 2.8 0.3 100.0 2,638 5.2Nyanza 8.9 48.4 17.6 9.7 9.3 5.9 0.2 100.0 2,461 6.1Rift Valley 16.5 43.4 15.4 6.6 13.5 4.4 0.1 100.0 3,897 5.4Western 9.9 53.6 15.3 10.3 8.5 2.3 0.1 100.0 1,754 5.3North Eastern 49.1 35.7 6.6 3.1 3.2 2.3 0.1 100.0 417 0.0Wealth quintileLowest 29.6 50.9 11.8 4.5 2.5 0.4 0.2 100.0 2,702 2.8Second 14.0 53.0 18.2 7.4 6.5 0.9 0.1 100.0 2,986 4.8Middle 11.0 49.8 19.6 8.6 9.5 1.3 0.1 100.0 3,000 5.6Fourth 8.3 41.8 18.2 9.9 16.1 5.3 0.4 100.0 3,048 6.6Highest 4.6 23.6 16.2 8.9 25.1 21.4 0.2 100.0 3,145 9.6Total 13.1 43.5 16.9 7.9 12.3 6.1 0.2 100.0 14,881 6.0Note: Total includes 9 m<strong>en</strong> whose age was not stated.1Completed Grade 8 at the primary lev<strong>el</strong>, for those under age 40; because of the change in the school system in the 1980s, those age 40and above are considered to have completed primary if they completed Grade 7.2Completed Form 4 at the secondary lev<strong>el</strong>2.3.2 School Att<strong>en</strong>dance RatesTable 2.4 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the primary school and secondary school net and gross att<strong>en</strong>dance ratios(NAR and GAR) for the school year that started in 2008 by household resid<strong>en</strong>ce and zones. The NARfor primary school is the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the primary-school-age (6-13 years) population that isatt<strong>en</strong>ding primary school. The NAR for secondary school is the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the secondary-schoolage(14-17 years) population that is att<strong>en</strong>ding secondary school. By definition, the NAR cannotexceed 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t. The GAR for primary school is the total number of primary school stud<strong>en</strong>ts, ofany age, expressed as a perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the official primary-school-age population. The GAR forsecondary school is the total number of secondary school stud<strong>en</strong>ts, of any age, expressed as aperc<strong>en</strong>tage of the official secondary-school-age population. If there are significant numbers of overageand under-age stud<strong>en</strong>ts at a giv<strong>en</strong> lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling, the GAR can exceed 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Youth areconsidered to be att<strong>en</strong>ding school curr<strong>en</strong>tly if they att<strong>en</strong>ded formal academic school at any pointduring the giv<strong>en</strong> school year.The g<strong>en</strong>der parity index (GPI) assesses sex-r<strong>el</strong>ated differ<strong>en</strong>ces in school att<strong>en</strong>dance rates andis calculated by dividing the GAR for the female population by the GAR for the male population. AGPI less than 1 indicates a g<strong>en</strong>der disparity in favour of the male population, i.e., a higher proportionof males than females att<strong>en</strong>ds that lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling. A GPI greater than 1 indicates a g<strong>en</strong>derdisparity in favour of females. A GPI of 1 indicates parity or equality betwe<strong>en</strong> the rates ofparticipation for the sexes.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 17


Table 2.4 School att<strong>en</strong>dance ratiosNet att<strong>en</strong>dance ratios (NAR) and gross att<strong>en</strong>dance ratios (GAR) for the de facto household population by sexand lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling; and the g<strong>en</strong>der parity index (GPI), according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNet att<strong>en</strong>dance ratio 1 Gross att<strong>en</strong>dance ratio 2Male Female TotalG<strong>en</strong>derparityindex 3 Male Female TotalPRIMARY SCHOOLG<strong>en</strong>derparityindex 3Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 85.4 82.5 83.9 0.97 106.8 100.4 103.5 0.94Rural 76.4 79.6 77.9 1.04 114.3 111.2 112.8 0.97ProvinceNairobi 89.8 92.1 91.1 1.03 102.7 100.2 101.3 0.98C<strong>en</strong>tral 89.4 90.5 89.9 1.01 117.5 117.1 117.3 1.00Coast 69.4 73.1 71.4 1.05 106.3 95.3 100.6 0.90Eastern 80.3 84.7 82.5 1.06 116.9 114.6 115.8 0.98Nyanza 85.3 87.5 86.3 1.03 128.7 121.5 125.3 0.94Rift Valley 70.5 73.2 71.9 1.04 100.8 101.0 100.9 1.00Western 79.0 82.0 80.5 1.04 127.8 128.5 128.1 1.01North Eastern 55.7 50.5 53.4 0.91 88.0 66.6 78.3 0.76Wealth quintileLowest 62.8 66.2 64.5 1.05 95.9 93.8 94.9 0.98Second 77.0 84.3 80.5 1.09 120.9 124.0 122.4 1.03Middle 81.8 84.0 82.9 1.03 127.0 118.1 122.6 0.93Fourth 84.7 82.7 83.7 0.98 116.2 109.4 112.8 0.94Highest 88.7 86.4 87.5 0.97 106.9 102.9 104.8 0.96Total 77.6 80.0 78.8 1.03 113.3 109.6 111.5 0.97SECONDARY SCHOOLResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 43.7 32.0 37.5 0.73 79.4 61.1 69.8 0.77Rural 13.1 16.0 14.5 1.23 46.6 34.3 40.5 0.73ProvinceNairobi 55.0 51.1 53.0 0.93 102.0 84.7 92.9 0.83C<strong>en</strong>tral 18.6 31.2 25.3 1.68 56.8 57.5 57.2 1.01Coast 22.1 14.6 18.5 0.66 34.2 29.9 32.1 0.87Eastern 15.8 17.8 16.7 1.13 50.9 43.2 47.4 0.85Nyanza 16.1 23.6 19.6 1.46 47.8 42.5 45.3 0.89Rift Valley 14.4 14.4 14.4 1.00 58.3 31.8 43.8 0.55Western 14.0 6.2 10.3 0.44 43.9 22.2 33.6 0.51North Eastern 10.6 10.0 10.4 0.95 24.1 17.9 21.4 0.74Wealth quintileLowest 7.2 5.6 6.4 0.78 26.7 12.5 19.8 0.47Second 9.3 7.8 8.6 0.83 41.9 24.3 33.4 0.58Middle 12.7 19.1 15.6 1.49 45.6 40.4 43.2 0.89Fourth 19.7 28.2 24.3 1.43 73.6 56.8 64.5 0.77Highest 53.3 37.0 44.7 0.69 86.8 64.3 74.9 0.74Total 17.0 18.4 17.7 1.08 50.8 38.2 44.6 0.751The NAR for primary school is the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the primary-school age (6-13 years) population that isatt<strong>en</strong>ding primary school. The NAR for secondary school is the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the secondary-school age (14-17 years) population that is att<strong>en</strong>ding secondary school. By definition the NAR cannot exceed 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t.2The GAR for primary school is the total number of primary school stud<strong>en</strong>ts, expressed as a perc<strong>en</strong>tage of theofficial primary-school-age population. The GAR for secondary school is the total number of secondary schoolstud<strong>en</strong>ts, expressed as a perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the official secondary-school-age population. If there are significantnumbers of overage and underage stud<strong>en</strong>ts at a giv<strong>en</strong> lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling, the GAR can exceed 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t.3The G<strong>en</strong>der Parity Index for primary school is the ratio of the primary school NAR(GAR) for females to theNAR(GAR) for males. The G<strong>en</strong>der Parity Index for secondary school is the ratio of the secondary schoolNAR(GAR) for females to the NAR(GAR) for males.The data for NAR in Table 2.4 indicates that 79 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> of primary school age areatt<strong>en</strong>ding school, which is id<strong>en</strong>tical to the finding of the 2003 KDHS. Surprisingly, the NAR isslightly higher for girls (80 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than for boys (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t). As expected, the NAR for primaryschool is higher in urban (84 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than in rural (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t) areas. The NAR for primary schoolincreases with the increase in the wealth quintile, from 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t at the lowest wealth quintile to88 perc<strong>en</strong>t at the highest wealth quintile.18 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


The GAR indicates that there are childr<strong>en</strong> in primary school who are not of primary schoolage, with ratios of 113 and 110 for males and females, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.As expected, the NAR and GAR are lower at the secondary school lev<strong>el</strong> than at the primarylev<strong>el</strong>. However, there has be<strong>en</strong> a considerable improvem<strong>en</strong>t in the secondary school NAR in 2008-09compared with the 2003 KDHS, where the 2008-09 NAR is 5 perc<strong>en</strong>tage points higher than the oneobserved in the 2003 KDHS. The gap betwe<strong>en</strong> the secondary school NAR in the lowest wealthquintile and that in the highest wealth quintile is very wide, ranging from 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t to 45 perc<strong>en</strong>t.The g<strong>en</strong>der parity index shows the ratio of the female to male GARs. In primary school, thereis parity betwe<strong>en</strong> the sexes because the index is close to 1. However, the GPI for secondary schooldrops to 0.75, indicating a bias in favour of males. Comparison with data from the 2003 KDHS showsthat the GPI for primary school has not changed much, though there is a notable increase in paritybetwe<strong>en</strong> the sexes in North Eastern province since 2003. For the secondary school lev<strong>el</strong>, the GPI in2008-09 is lower than the one observed in 2003.Table 2.5 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the population age 6-24 who att<strong>en</strong>ded school in 2008 byage, sex and resid<strong>en</strong>ce. Ninety-three perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age 6-15 att<strong>en</strong>ded school in 2008, with urbanatt<strong>en</strong>dance accounting for a higher proportion (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than rural att<strong>en</strong>dance (93 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Att<strong>en</strong>dance by those age 21-24 is r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y low, with about one of five (18 perc<strong>en</strong>t) having att<strong>en</strong>dedschool in 2008.Table 2.5 School att<strong>en</strong>dancePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of the de facto population age 6-24 years who att<strong>en</strong>ded school in 2008 by age, sex andresid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgeMale Female Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban Rural Total Urban Rural Total Urban Rural Total6-10 96.5 90.4 91.3 97.7 90.2 91.3 97.1 90.3 91.311-15 97.1 95.1 95.4 94.2 95.2 95.0 95.4 95.2 95.26-15 96.7 92.5 93.1 96.2 92.5 93.0 96.4 92.5 93.016-20 66.7 74.0 72.7 42.1 61.5 57.1 52.5 67.9 64.921-24 19.2 29.8 26.9 10.7 10.6 10.6 14.4 19.5 18.0Att<strong>en</strong>dance rates for both male and female youth are at par at the age groups 6-10 (91 perc<strong>en</strong>t)and 11-15 (95 perc<strong>en</strong>t). However, at age group 16-20, there is a noticeably big gap in att<strong>en</strong>dancebetwe<strong>en</strong> males and females; 73 perc<strong>en</strong>t of males att<strong>en</strong>ded school in 2008 compared with 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t offemales. This pattern continues in the 21-24 age group in which more than twice as many malesatt<strong>en</strong>ded school in 2008 as females (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t for males and 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t for females). Urbanatt<strong>en</strong>dance is higher (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with rural att<strong>en</strong>dance (93 perc<strong>en</strong>t) only for the 6-15 agegroup. In the 16-20 and 21-24 age groups, more people in rural areas than in urban areas att<strong>en</strong>dedschool in 2008.Figure 2.2 illustrates age-specific att<strong>en</strong>dance rates, i.e., the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of a giv<strong>en</strong> age cohortwho att<strong>en</strong>d school, regardless of the lev<strong>el</strong> att<strong>en</strong>ded (primary, secondary, or higher). At age 5,att<strong>en</strong>dance by males is twice that of females (12 perc<strong>en</strong>t for males versus 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t for females).However, from age 6 to age 10, female att<strong>en</strong>dance is higher than that of males. Att<strong>en</strong>dance peaks atage 13 for males and 14 for females where the peak att<strong>en</strong>dance rate is id<strong>en</strong>tical (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t) for bothg<strong>en</strong>ders. From age 14 onward, as school att<strong>en</strong>dance begins to decline, the g<strong>en</strong>der differ<strong>en</strong>tialincreases, with more male than female youths att<strong>en</strong>ding.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 19


Figure 2.2 Age-specific Att<strong>en</strong>dance Rates of thede-facto Population 5 to 24 YearsPerc<strong>en</strong>t847994 95 96 95 96 96 96 9692 9394 959091 92857673666255876244444029 29252232231268106 75 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24AgeFemaleMaleK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-092.4 HOUSEHOLD ENVIRONMENTThe physical characteristics of the dw<strong>el</strong>ling in which a household lives are importantdeterminants of the health status of household members, especially childr<strong>en</strong>. They can also be used asindicators of the socioeconomic status of households. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts in the 2008-09 KDHS were askeda number of questions about their household <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t, including questions on the source ofdrinking water; type of sanitation facility; type of flooring, walls, and roof; and number of rooms inthe dw<strong>el</strong>ling. The results are pres<strong>en</strong>ted here in terms of households and of the de jure population.2.4.1 Drinking WaterIncreasing access to improved drinking water is one of the Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goalsthat K<strong>en</strong>ya along with other nations worldwide has adopted (United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly 2001).Table 2.6 includes a number of indicators that are useful in monitoring household access to improveddrinking water (WHO and UNICEF, 2005). The source of drinking water is an indicator of whether itis suitable for drinking. Sources that are lik<strong>el</strong>y to provide water suitable for drinking are id<strong>en</strong>tified asimproved sources in Table 2.6. They include a piped source within the dw<strong>el</strong>ling or plot, public tap,tube w<strong>el</strong>l or borehole, protected w<strong>el</strong>l or spring, and rainwater. 2 Lack of ready access to a water sourcemay limit the quantity of suitable drinking water that is available to a household. Ev<strong>en</strong> if the water isobtained from an improved source, moreover, water that must be fetched from a source that is notimmediat<strong>el</strong>y accessible to the household may be contaminated during transport or storage. Anotherfactor in considering the accessibility of water sources is that the burd<strong>en</strong> of going for water oft<strong>en</strong> fallsdisproportionat<strong>el</strong>y on female members of the household. Finally, home water treatm<strong>en</strong>t can beeffective in improving the quality of household drinking water.As shown in Table 2.6, three out of five households in K<strong>en</strong>ya (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t) get drinking waterfrom an improved source. However, disparities exist by resid<strong>en</strong>ce, with a higher proportion of urbanhouseholds (91 perc<strong>en</strong>t) having an improved source of drinking water compared with rural households(54 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among the improved sources, piped water into the plot accounts for the highestproportion (15 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of households, but mainly in urban areas (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while the mostcommon improved category for rural households is a protected dug w<strong>el</strong>l (12 perc<strong>en</strong>t).2 The categorization into improved and non-improved follows that proposed by the WHO/UNICEF JointMonitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (WHO and UNICEF, 2004).20 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


More than one-third of K<strong>en</strong>yan households get their drinking water from a non-improvedsource, mainly surface water from lakes, streams, and rivers (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households). Althoughonly 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban households use non-improved sources for drinking water, the proportion is farhigher for rural households (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 2.6 Household drinking waterPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households and de jure population by source, time to collect, and person who usually collectsdrinking water; and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households and the de jure population by treatm<strong>en</strong>t of drinking water, according toresid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09CharacteristicHouseholdsPopulationUrban Rural Total Urban Rural TotalSource of drinking waterImproved source 89.3 53.8 63.0 89.7 53.1 60.2Piped water into dw<strong>el</strong>ling 22.8 4.7 9.4 24.4 3.5 7.5Piped water into plot 33.1 9.0 15.2 30.7 7.5 12.0Public tap/standpipe 19.8 6.1 9.7 21.3 6.2 9.1Tube w<strong>el</strong>l or borehole 6.7 9.5 8.8 5.6 9.7 8.9Protected dug w<strong>el</strong>l 4.7 11.6 9.8 5.1 12.9 11.4Protected spring 1.6 10.2 8.0 1.9 11.0 9.2Rainwater 0.6 2.7 2.2 0.7 2.4 2.1Non-improved source 6.3 45.8 35.5 6.2 46.5 38.7Unprotected dug w<strong>el</strong>l 1.3 6.2 4.9 1.5 6.4 5.5Unprotected spring 0.9 7.2 5.6 1.0 7.7 6.4Tanker truck/cart with smalltank 2.1 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.1 1.2Surface water 1.9 31.3 23.7 2.0 31.3 25.6Bottled water, improvedsource for cooking/washing 1 1.4 0.0 0.4 1.2 0.0 0.2Bottled water, non-improvedsource for cooking/washing 1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1Other 2.8 0.4 1.0 2.7 0.3 0.8Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Perc<strong>en</strong>tage using any improvedsource of drinking water 90.8 53.8 63.4 91.0 53.1 60.4Time to obtain drinking water(round trip)Water on premises 64.7 26.2 36.2 64.1 23.4 31.2Less than 30 minutes 26.9 33.9 32.1 26.1 34.4 32.830 minutes or longer 6.3 39.3 30.7 7.8 41.9 35.3Don’t know/missing 2.2 0.5 1.0 2.1 0.4 0.7Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Person who usually collectsdrinking waterAdult female 15+ 21.5 58.0 48.5 24.9 64.3 56.7Adult male 15+ 9.8 9.1 9.2 6.6 5.4 5.7Female child under age 15 0.7 3.9 3.1 0.9 4.5 3.8Male child under age 15 0.3 1.9 1.5 0.4 1.8 1.6Other 2.9 0.9 1.4 3.1 0.5 1.0Water on premises 64.7 26.2 36.2 64.1 23.4 31.2Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Treatm<strong>en</strong>t of water 2Boiled 38.0 25.4 28.6 37.6 24.0 26.6Bleach/chlorine 21.5 16.3 17.6 22.9 17.0 18.2Strained through cloth 0.3 1.5 1.2 0.4 1.7 1.4Ceramic, sand, or other filter 1.7 0.5 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.8Solar disinfection 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1Allowed to settle 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.4Other 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1No treatm<strong>en</strong>t 42.5 59.1 54.8 42.1 59.7 56.3Perc<strong>en</strong>tage using anappropriate treatm<strong>en</strong>tmethod 3 57.1 40.2 44.6 57.5 39.8 43.2Number 2,350 6,707 9,057 7,365 30,704 38,0691Because the quality of bottled water is not known, households using bottled water for drinking are classified as using animproved or non-improved source according to their water source for cooking and washing.2Respond<strong>en</strong>ts may report multiple treatm<strong>en</strong>t methods, so the sum of treatm<strong>en</strong>t may exceed 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t.3Appropriate water treatm<strong>en</strong>t methods include boiling, bleaching, straining, filtering, and solar disinfecting.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 21


Almost one-third of households are within 30 minutes of the source of their drinking water,and more than a third have water on the premises. The remaining 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households musttrav<strong>el</strong> 30 minutes or longer to get drinking water. Notably, 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households trav<strong>el</strong> atleast 30 minutes to obtain drinking water, compared with only 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban households.Similarly, a huge urban-rural disparity exists in the proportion of households with water on thepremises, with nearly two-thirds (65 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of urban households having water compared with26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households.Wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya, especially those in rural areas, bear the burd<strong>en</strong> of collecting drinking water.In nearly half of K<strong>en</strong>yan households (49 perc<strong>en</strong>t), adult wom<strong>en</strong> are responsible for water collection.In rural households, adult wom<strong>en</strong> are six times more lik<strong>el</strong>y than adult m<strong>en</strong> to be the ones to fetchwater (58 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households compared with 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Ev<strong>en</strong> in urban households,wom<strong>en</strong> are more than twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y as m<strong>en</strong> to collect water (22 and 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households). It is<strong>en</strong>couraging to note that childr<strong>en</strong> under age 15 are usually responsible for fetching drinking water inonly 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households.Less than half of K<strong>en</strong>yan households (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t) treat their drinking water. The main methodof treatm<strong>en</strong>t is boiling (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households), while 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households add bleach orchlorine to make water safer for drinking. Appropriate water treatm<strong>en</strong>t methods are more commonamong urban households (57 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than among rural households (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t).2.4.2 Household Sanitation FacilitiesEnsuring adequate sanitation facilities is a Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goal that K<strong>en</strong>ya shareswith other countries. A household is classified as having an improved toilet if the toilet is used onlyby members of one household (i.e., it is not shared) and if the facility used by the household separatesthe waste from human contact (WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply andSanitation, 2004).As shown in Table 2.7, less than one-quarter of households use an improved toilet facility thatis not shared with other households. Urban households are only slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y than ruralhouseholds to have an improved toilet facility (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). The mostcommon type of toilet facility in rural areas is an op<strong>en</strong> pit latrine or one without a slab (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofrural households), while in urban areas toilet facilities are mainly shared with other households(52 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Overall, 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households have no toilet facility at all; they are almostexclusiv<strong>el</strong>y rural, accounting for 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households.Table 2.7 Household sanitation facilitiesPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households and de jure population by type of toilet/latrine facilities, according toresid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Type of toilet/latrine facilityHouseholdsPopulationUrban Rural Total Urban Rural TotalImproved, not shared facility 29.8 20.1 22.6 34.3 21.8 24.3Flush/pour flush to piped sewersystem 18.7 0.6 5.3 20.2 0.6 4.4Flush/pour flush to septic tank 5.5 0.3 1.7 6.6 0.3 1.5Flush/pour flush to pit latrine 1.5 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.2 0.5V<strong>en</strong>tilated improved pit (VIP)latrine 2.3 9.0 7.3 3.4 9.5 8.4Pit latrine with slab 1.8 10.0 7.8 2.5 11.2 9.5Non-improved facility 70.1 79.8 77.3 65.7 78.1 75.7Any facility shared with otherhouseholds 52.2 16.7 25.9 47.6 13.5 20.1Flush/pour flush not to sewer/septic tank/pit latrine 3.3 0.2 1.0 3.3 0.1 0.7Pit latrine without slab/op<strong>en</strong> pit 13.5 46.5 37.9 13.3 46.4 40.0Bucket/Hanging toilet, latrine 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4No facility/bush/fi<strong>el</strong>d 0.9 16.0 12.1 1.1 17.7 14.5Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 2,350 6,707 9,057 7,365 30,704 38,06922 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


2.4.3 Housing CharacteristicsTable 2.8 pres<strong>en</strong>ts characteristics of the dw<strong>el</strong>lings in which K<strong>en</strong>yan households live. Thesecharacteristics reflect the household’s socioeconomic situation. They also may influ<strong>en</strong>ce<strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>tal conditions—for example, in the case of the use of biomass fu<strong>el</strong>s, exposure to indoorpollution—that have a direct bearing on the health and w<strong>el</strong>fare of household members.Table 2.8 Household characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households and de jure population by housing characteristics and perc<strong>en</strong>tageusing solid fu<strong>el</strong> for cooking, according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Housing characteristicHouseholdsPopulationUrban Rural Total Urban Rural TotalElectricityYes 65.6 8.1 23.0 64.8 6.9 18.1No 34.3 91.9 76.9 35.1 93.1 81.9Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Flooring materialEarth, sand 8.0 44.1 34.8 8.8 44.7 37.7Dung 2.4 26.6 20.3 2.6 29.0 23.9Wood planks 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3Parquet, polished wood 1.6 0.1 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.3Vinyl, asphalt strips 1.4 0.1 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.3Ceramic tiles 3.6 0.2 1.1 3.8 0.2 0.9Cem<strong>en</strong>t 77.8 27.9 40.8 76.6 25.1 35.0Carpet 4.9 0.5 1.7 5.2 0.5 1.4Other/missing 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Rooms used for sleepingOne 65.6 41.9 48.0 53.9 34.1 37.9Two 22.5 36.1 32.6 28.1 39.0 36.9Three or more 11.8 22.0 19.4 17.9 26.9 25.1Missing 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Place for cookingIn the house 84.5 33.1 46.4 80.4 27.7 37.9In a separate building 7.3 59.5 46.0 9.9 65.1 54.4Outdoors 6.7 6.7 6.7 9.0 7.1 7.4Other 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Missing 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.3Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Cooking fu<strong>el</strong>Electricity 1.6 0.1 0.5 1.4 0.0 0.3LPG/Natural gas 21.7 1.2 6.5 21.2 0.9 4.8Keros<strong>en</strong>e 26.9 1.5 8.1 20.9 0.6 4.5Coal, lignite 0.1 1.1 0.8 0.0 1.1 0.9Charcoal 41.1 10.8 18.7 45.2 8.7 15.8Wood 6.1 83.3 63.3 9.4 87.0 71.9Straw/shrubs/grass 0.8 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.6 1.5Agricultural crop 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1No food cooked inhousehold 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.3Other/missing 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Perc<strong>en</strong>tage using solidfu<strong>el</strong> for cooking 1 48.0 96.6 84.0 55.6 98.4 90.1Number 2,350 6,707 9,057 7,365 30,704 38,069LPG = Liquid petroleum gas1Includes coal/lignite, charcoal, wood, straw/shrubs/grass, and agricultural cropsAlmost one-quarter (23 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of K<strong>en</strong>yan households have <strong>el</strong>ectricity, an increase from the16 perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded in the 2003 KDHS. There is a large imbalance betwe<strong>en</strong> urban and rural areas,with two-thirds (66 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of urban households having <strong>el</strong>ectricity compared with only 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofrural households.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 23


More than half of K<strong>en</strong>yan households (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t) live in dw<strong>el</strong>lings with floors made of earth,sand, or dung. The next most common type of flooring material is cem<strong>en</strong>t, accounting for 41 perc<strong>en</strong>tof households. Most urban households have floors made of cem<strong>en</strong>t (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while those in ruralareas mainly have floors made from earth, sand, or dung (71 perc<strong>en</strong>t).The number of rooms used for sleeping is an indicator of the ext<strong>en</strong>t of crowding inhouseholds. Overcrowding increases the risk of contracting diseases like acute respiratory infections,tuberculosis, and skin diseases. Overall, almost half of K<strong>en</strong>yan households use only one room forsleeping, while one-third use two rooms and the remainder use three or more rooms for sleeping.Urban households t<strong>en</strong>d to have fewer rooms for sleeping; two-thirds use only one room for sleeping,compared with 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households.With regard to cooking arrangem<strong>en</strong>ts, K<strong>en</strong>yan households are ev<strong>en</strong>ly divided betwe<strong>en</strong>cooking in the house and cooking in a separate building (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t each). Sev<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t ofhouseholds do their cooking outdoors. There is large variation in the place of cooking by resid<strong>en</strong>ce,with urban households mostly cooking in the house (85 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and rural households mainly cookingin a separate building (60 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Cooking and heating with solid fu<strong>el</strong>s can lead to high lev<strong>el</strong>s of indoor smoke, a complex mixof health-damaging pollutants that could increase the risks of acute respiratory diseases. Solid fu<strong>el</strong>sare defined as coal, charcoal, wood, straw, shrubs, and agricultural crops. In the 2008-09 KDHS,households were asked about their primary source of fu<strong>el</strong> for cooking. Their answers show that84 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households use solid fu<strong>el</strong> for cooking. The use of solid fu<strong>el</strong> is nearly universal inhouseholds in rural areas (97 perc<strong>en</strong>t), compared with less than half of those in urban areas. The mostcommon cooking fu<strong>el</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya is wood, used by close to two-thirds (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of households.Although wood is wid<strong>el</strong>y used in rural areas (83 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households), urban households r<strong>el</strong>y mainlyon charcoal (41 perc<strong>en</strong>t), keros<strong>en</strong>e (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and liquid petroleum gas or natural gas (22 perc<strong>en</strong>t).2.5 HOUSEHOLD POSSESSIONSThe availability of durable consumer goods is a useful indicator of a household’ssocioeconomic status. Moreover, particular goods have specific b<strong>en</strong>efits. For instance, having accessto a radio or a t<strong>el</strong>evision exposes household members to innovative ideas; a refrigerator prolongs thewholesom<strong>en</strong>ess of foods; and a means of transport allows greater access to many services away fromthe local area. Table 2.9 shows the availability of s<strong>el</strong>ected consumer goods by resid<strong>en</strong>ce.Ownership of durable goods varies according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce and the nature of the asset. Of the16 s<strong>el</strong>ected items asked about in the survey, radios, homes, agricultural land, farm animals, and th<strong>el</strong>and on which the dw<strong>el</strong>ling is located stand out as the assets most commonly owned by households.Sev<strong>en</strong>ty-four perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan households own a radio, while about two-thirds own land, theirdw<strong>el</strong>ling, and agricultural animals. Notably, 62 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households own a mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone.Somewhat fewer households own a clock (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t), a bicycle (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t), or a t<strong>el</strong>evision(28 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while fewer than one in t<strong>en</strong> households own a refrigerator, car, truck, motorcycle, animalcart, motorboat, solar pan<strong>el</strong>, or land-line t<strong>el</strong>ephone.There is noticeable urban-rural variation in the proportion of households owning specificgoods. Most of the <strong>el</strong>ectronic goods are considerably more preval<strong>en</strong>t in urban areas, but farm-ori<strong>en</strong>tedpossessions are more commonly found in rural areas. For example, 21 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban householdsown a refrigerator compared with only 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households. Similarly, 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urbanhouseholds own a t<strong>el</strong>evision compared with 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households. Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in ownershipof mobile phones are also appar<strong>en</strong>t (86 perc<strong>en</strong>t for urban households and 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t for ruralhouseholds). Radio possession is high among both urban and rural households (82 perc<strong>en</strong>t and71 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). It is evid<strong>en</strong>t that less than 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households in urban areas own thedw<strong>el</strong>ling in which they reside or the land on which the dw<strong>el</strong>ling is built, compared with over 80perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural households. As expected, ownership of farm animals (cattle, cows, bulls, horses,donkeys, mules, goats, sheep, or chick<strong>en</strong>s) is high in rural areas (80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households).24 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


Table 2.9 Household durable goodsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of households and de jure population possessing various household effects, means oftransportation, agricultural land, and livestock/farm animals by resid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09PossessionHouseholdsPopulationUrban Rural Total Urban Rural TotalClock 65.3 37.5 44.7 67.3 39.1 44.5Radio 82.0 70.6 73.6 82.6 72.3 74.3T<strong>el</strong>evision 57.1 17.9 28.1 60.1 18.8 26.8Mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone 85.6 53.0 61.5 85.2 55.5 61.3Non-mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone 6.6 0.5 2.0 8.1 0.5 2.0Refrigerator 21.2 1.2 6.4 24.0 1.2 5.6Solar pan<strong>el</strong> 2.9 5.8 5.0 3.3 6.5 5.9Bicycle 17.7 34.4 30.1 20.6 38.3 34.9Animal drawn cart 1.0 3.2 2.6 1.5 3.7 3.3Motorcycle/scooter 2.8 1.9 2.1 3.7 2.1 2.4Car/truck 13.4 2.9 5.6 14.4 2.9 5.2Boat with a motor 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3Ownership of dw<strong>el</strong>ling 17.9 84.4 67.2 23.4 88.8 76.1Ownership of land on whichdw<strong>el</strong>ling is built 16.4 81.2 64.4 21.1 85.5 73.0Ownership of agricultural land 35.3 78.1 67.0 39.7 80.3 72.4Ownership of farm animals 1 27.2 79.6 66.0 30.6 84.7 74.3Number 2,350 6,707 9,057 7,365 30,704 38,0691Cattle, cows, bulls, horses, donkeys, mules, goats, sheep, or chick<strong>en</strong>sThere has be<strong>en</strong> an increase in the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households owning some items since the 2003KDHS. The most dramatic increase has be<strong>en</strong> with ownership of t<strong>el</strong>ephones; the proportion ofhouseholds with either a mobile or non-mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone has increased from 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to atleast 62 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. 3 This increase could be a result of increased availability of affordablephones together with an increase in the number of service providers and the ext<strong>en</strong>t of geographicalcoverage. The proportion of households owning t<strong>el</strong>evisions also increased, from 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to28 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Ownership of other items increased minimally.2.6 WEALTH INDEXThe wealth index is a background characteristic that is used throughout the report as a proxyfor the long-term standard of living of the household. It is based on the data from the household’sownership of consumer goods; dw<strong>el</strong>ling characteristics; type of drinking water source; toilet facilities;and other characteristics that r<strong>el</strong>ate to a household’s socioeconomic status. To construct the index,each of these assets was assigned a weight (factor score) g<strong>en</strong>erated through principal compon<strong>en</strong>tanalysis, and the resulting asset scores were standardised in r<strong>el</strong>ation to a standard normal distribution,with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one (Gwatkin et al., 2000). Each household was th<strong>en</strong>assigned a score for each asset, and the scores were summed for each household. Individuals wereranked according to the total score of the household in which they resided. The sample was th<strong>en</strong>divided into quintiles from one (lowest) to five (highest). A single asset index was dev<strong>el</strong>oped on thebasis of data from the <strong>en</strong>tire country sample, and this index is used in all the tabulations pres<strong>en</strong>ted.Table 2.10 shows the distribution of the de jure household population into five wealth lev<strong>el</strong>s(quintiles) based on the wealth index by resid<strong>en</strong>ce. These distributions indicate the degree to whichwealth is ev<strong>en</strong>ly (or unev<strong>en</strong>ly) distributed by geographic areas.3 In the 2003 KDHS, mobile and non-mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephones were combined into one category, but in the 2008-09KDHS, the two were separated.Household Population and Housing Characteristics | 25


Table 2.10 Wealth quintilesPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of the de jure population by wealth quintiles, according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce and region,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Resid<strong>en</strong>ce/regionWealth quintileLowest Second Middle Fourth HighestTotalNumber ofpopulationResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 0.5 1.5 2.7 16.8 78.5 100.0 7,365Rural 24.7 24.4 24.2 20.7 6.0 100.0 30,704ProvinceNairobi 0.0 0.0 0.2 4.2 95.5 100.0 2,352C<strong>en</strong>tral 2.2 11.1 29.2 36.0 21.4 100.0 3,870Coast 26.3 12.4 9.4 16.2 35.7 100.0 2,953Eastern 16.7 22.3 27.6 26.3 7.1 100.0 6,629Nyanza 17.6 28.4 23.9 17.7 12.3 100.0 6,324Rift Valley 28.2 19.2 16.1 17.8 18.7 100.0 10,375Western 17.9 33.0 25.1 18.8 5.2 100.0 4,506North Eastern 75.9 5.6 5.5 4.9 8.0 100.0 1,059Total 20.0 20.0 20.0 19.9 20.1 100.0 38,069Wealth is conc<strong>en</strong>trated in the urban areas, with 79 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the urban population falling inthe highest wealth quintile. In contrast, those in rural areas are poorer, with one quarter in the lowestwealth quintile and only 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the highest quintile. Nairobi province, which is <strong>en</strong>tir<strong>el</strong>y urban,has 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t of its population in the highest quintile, while North Eastern province has over threequartersof its population in the lowest quintile. Other provinces have varying distributions ofpopulation in differ<strong>en</strong>t wealth quintiles. Coast, Eastern, Nyanza, Rift Valley, and Western provincesshow a substantial distribution across all the quintiles. On the other hand, C<strong>en</strong>tral province has mostof its population within the highest three quintiles.2.7 BIRTH REGISTRATIONThe registration of births is the inscription of the facts of the birth into an official log kept atthe registrar’s office. A birth certificate is issued at the time of registration or later as proof of theregistration of the birth. Birth registration is basic to <strong>en</strong>suring a child’s legal status and, thus, basicrights and services (UNICEF, 2006; United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly, 2002).Table 2.11 gives the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age whose births wereofficially registered and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had a birth certificate at the time of the survey. Not allchildr<strong>en</strong> who are registered may have a birth certificate because some certificates may have be<strong>en</strong> lostor never issued. However, all childr<strong>en</strong> with a certificate have be<strong>en</strong> registered.Three of every five childr<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya under age five have be<strong>en</strong> registered with civilauthorities, and close to one-quarter (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have a birth certificate. The distribution by agebrackets and g<strong>en</strong>der shows a nearly equal proportion of birth registration. However, differ<strong>en</strong>tials existaccording to resid<strong>en</strong>ce, province, and wealth quintile. For example, the births of 76 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> in urban areas have be<strong>en</strong> registered, compared with only 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t in rural areas. Nairobiprovince leads in the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> registered (86 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by C<strong>en</strong>tral province(81 perc<strong>en</strong>t), with Nyanza province having the lowest proportion registered (42 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The resultsshow that childr<strong>en</strong> in higher wealth quintiles are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be registered and to possess a birthcertificate than those in lower wealth quintiles.26 | Household Population and Housing Characteristics


Table 2.11 Birth registration of childr<strong>en</strong> under age fivePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of de jure childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age whose birthsare registered with the civil authorities, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong>whose births are registeredHad abirthcertificateDid nothave abirthcertificateTotalregisteredNumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age


Table 2.12 Reason for not registering birthPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of de jure childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age whose birth was not registered with the civil authorities,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Reason child’s birth was never registeredBackgroundcharacteristicToo farLackedmoneyNotawareNotnecessaryNomadiclife/insecurity Other MissingTotalNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age


CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS 3Vivianne Nyarunda and Gladys MbalukuThis chapter provides a profile of the respond<strong>en</strong>ts who were interviewed in the 2008-09K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS), i.e., wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54. First,information is pres<strong>en</strong>ted on a number of basic characteristics, including age at the time of the survey,r<strong>el</strong>igion, marital status, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, education, literacy, and media access. Th<strong>en</strong>, the chapter exploresadults’ employm<strong>en</strong>t status, occupation, and earnings. This information is useful for understanding thefactors that influ<strong>en</strong>ce reproductive behaviour and contraceptive use as they provide a context for theinterpretation of demographic and health indices. An analysis of these variables provides thesocioeconomic context within which demographic and reproductive health issues are examined in thesubsequ<strong>en</strong>t chapters.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS OF SURVEY RESPONDENTSTable 3.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the distribution of 8,444 wom<strong>en</strong> and 3,256 m<strong>en</strong>, age 15-49, by age, maritalstatus, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, province, education, wealth, r<strong>el</strong>igion, and ethnicity. The distribution of therespond<strong>en</strong>ts according to age shows a g<strong>en</strong>erally similar pattern for m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>. As expected inK<strong>en</strong>ya’s age structure, the proportion of respond<strong>en</strong>ts in each age group declines with increasing agefor both sexes. Forty-one perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 43 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> are in the 15-24 age group,32 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 29 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> are age 25-34, and the remaining respond<strong>en</strong>ts are age 35-49.Fifty-eight perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married or living with a partner, comparedwith 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong>. The proportion of m<strong>en</strong> who have never married is almost equal to those insome form of union (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t), but only 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> have never married. Whereas4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> are widowed and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t are either divorced or separated, less than1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong> are widowed, and 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t are divorced or separated.The proportion of m<strong>en</strong> in urban areas (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t) is just slightly above that of the wom<strong>en</strong>(25 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Within the eight provinces in K<strong>en</strong>ya, the Rift Valley province has the largest proportionof respond<strong>en</strong>ts (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and the North Eastern province has the smallest (2 perc<strong>en</strong>t).As shown in Table 3.1, 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> have no education, compared with 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t oftheir male counterparts. Furthermore, 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong> have completed secondary or highereducation, compared with 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong>.About half of those interviewed (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the female and 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the malepopulations) are in the two highest wealth quintiles, and the smallest proportions are in the lowestquintile (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> and 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong>). Overall, the proportions increase acrossthe quintiles for both m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>.The distribution of respond<strong>en</strong>ts by r<strong>el</strong>igion shows a pattern similar to that se<strong>en</strong> in the 2003KDHS, with nine of t<strong>en</strong> respond<strong>en</strong>ts being Christian. There is a slight decline in the proportion of m<strong>en</strong>who report that they practice no r<strong>el</strong>igion (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t, compared with 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003), but forwom<strong>en</strong>, the proportion remains at 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Ethnic affiliation is associated with various demographic behaviours because of differ<strong>en</strong>ces incultural b<strong>el</strong>iefs. For example, in K<strong>en</strong>ya, certain ethnic groups <strong>en</strong>courage the practice of female g<strong>en</strong>italcutting. Survey data show that the Kikuyu and Luhya ethnic groups are the largest, accounting forabout 16-19 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 29


Table 3.1 Background characteristics of respond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Background characteristicWom<strong>en</strong>Weightedperc<strong>en</strong>t Weighted UnweightedM<strong>en</strong>Weightedperc<strong>en</strong>t Weighted UnweightedAge15-19 20.8 1,761 1,767 23.8 776 76320-24 20.3 1,715 1,744 19.3 630 62025-29 17.2 1,454 1,423 14.8 483 48830-34 14.3 1,209 1,180 14.2 461 48235-39 10.4 877 930 10.6 344 35940-44 9.1 768 730 9.4 306 29145-49 7.8 661 670 7.9 257 253Marital statusNever married 31.2 2,634 2,540 46.8 1,524 1,501Married 54.2 4,578 4,682 46.9 1,527 1,574Living together 4.1 350 359 2.0 65 58Divorced/separated 6.1 512 512 3.8 123 107Widowed 4.4 369 351 0.6 19 16Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 25.4 2,148 2,615 26.6 866 1,023Rural 74.6 6,296 5,829 73.4 2,392 2,233ProvinceNairobi 8.6 728 952 9.6 314 399C<strong>en</strong>tral 10.7 905 973 10.7 347 365Coast 8.0 674 1,149 7.7 252 419Eastern 16.3 1,376 1,127 16.3 530 417Nyanza 16.4 1,389 1,318 16.0 520 511Rift Valley 26.8 2,262 1,278 27.2 885 517Western 11.0 927 1,039 10.7 349 429North Eastern 2.2 184 608 1.9 62 199Highest lev<strong>el</strong> of schoolingNo education 8.9 752 1,242 3.4 112 171Some primary 29.9 2,526 2,431 27.1 883 889Completed primary 26.9 2,272 1,973 24.7 804 800Some secondary 12.2 1,030 961 14.6 477 429Completed secondary 14.7 1,243 1,123 20.5 666 612More than secondary 7.3 620 714 9.7 316 355Wealth quintileLowest 16.5 1,393 1,699 14.0 457 543Second 17.6 1,483 1,284 17.7 577 543Middle 19.1 1,613 1,455 17.6 574 547Fourth 20.6 1,736 1,617 22.3 725 675Highest 26.3 2,220 2,389 28.4 926 948R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 21.9 1,852 1,684 25.6 834 775Protestant/other Christian 68.1 5,748 5,152 63.4 2,065 1,892Muslim 7.4 626 1,358 6.2 204 421No r<strong>el</strong>igion 2.2 185 184 4.1 133 127Missing 0.0 3 9 0.2 7 2EthnicityEmbu 1.4 120 145 2.1 70 80Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 13.2 1,115 750 13.3 432 297Kamba 10.9 923 666 11.6 378 274Kikuyu 19.4 1,642 1,504 17.5 569 545Kisii 6.9 579 447 7.0 228 179Luhya 16.3 1,373 1,266 17.7 578 539Luo 13.0 1,098 1,113 13.0 425 458Maasai 1.3 113 124 1.2 39 42Meru 4.9 415 367 5.1 168 155Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 5.1 430 717 4.0 131 240Somali 2.8 240 679 2.1 69 202Taita/Taveta 0.9 79 124 1.1 37 48Other 3.7 317 542 4.2 136 197Total 15-49 100.0 8,444 8,444 100.0 3,258 3,256M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na na na 207 209Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na na na na 3,465 3,465na = Not applicable30 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


3.2 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT BY BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICSTables 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 pres<strong>en</strong>t an overview of the r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s lev<strong>el</strong>of education and other background characteristics. As m<strong>en</strong>tioned, male respond<strong>en</strong>ts are more educatedthan their female counterparts. The proportion of m<strong>en</strong> with no education is less than 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t in allage groups. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> in groups age 35 and above with no education are all greaterthan 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t; indeed, one of every five wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49 has no education.Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t by type of place of resid<strong>en</strong>ce shows that respond<strong>en</strong>ts in urban areasare more educated than their rural counterparts. Fifty-three perc<strong>en</strong>t of males in urban areas havecompleted secondary school or higher, compared with 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the rural areas. Among wom<strong>en</strong>,45 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in urban areas have completed secondary education or higher, compared with only14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of their counterparts in rural areas. Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t by province shows animprovem<strong>en</strong>t from the 2003 lev<strong>el</strong>s. For example, North Eastern province still has the largestproportion of respond<strong>en</strong>ts with no education (41 perc<strong>en</strong>t for males and 78 perc<strong>en</strong>t for females). Thisis, however, an improvem<strong>en</strong>t from 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 93 perc<strong>en</strong>t for the m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> in 2003,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t by wealth quintile shows that there is improvem<strong>en</strong>t with higher wealthstatus for both m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>. For example, only 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in the highest quintile have noeducation, compared with 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the lowest quintile. On the other hand, only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest quintile have completed secondary school, compared with 28 perc<strong>en</strong>t in thehighest quintile. This pattern is similar to that depicted among m<strong>en</strong>, with only 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong> inthe lowest quintile having completed at least secondary education, but 55 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in thehighest quintile having attained that lev<strong>el</strong>.Table 3.2.1 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by highest lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded or completed, and median grade completed,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNoeducationSomeprimaryHighest lev<strong>el</strong> of schoolingCompletedprimary 1SomesecondaryCompletedsecondary 2More thansecondaryTotalMedianyearscompletedNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 5.6 33.1 26.1 16.9 12.9 5.3 100.0 7.4 3,47515-19 4.1 41.2 22.9 22.7 8.2 0.9 100.0 7.2 1,76120-24 7.2 24.9 29.4 11.0 17.8 9.8 100.0 7.6 1,71525-29 8.3 24.5 32.6 10.7 13.7 10.2 100.0 7.5 1,45430-34 7.8 31.6 25.7 8.4 16.9 9.6 100.0 7.4 1,20935-39 10.7 33.9 21.9 6.4 17.3 9.8 100.0 7.3 87740-44 14.1 20.4 30.0 8.5 19.6 7.4 100.0 6.7 76845-49 21.3 27.8 23.9 9.5 13.3 4.2 100.0 6.0 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 4.7 14.0 23.7 12.8 27.2 17.6 100.0 9.8 2,148Rural 10.4 35.3 28.0 12.0 10.5 3.8 100.0 7.0 6,296ProvinceNairobi 2.5 7.9 21.5 12.2 24.8 31.1 100.0 11.1 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.7 21.4 36.5 16.6 19.0 5.8 100.0 7.7 905Coast 24.3 25.6 21.6 9.3 14.2 4.9 100.0 6.7 674Eastern 5.7 36.1 29.8 12.1 11.6 4.7 100.0 7.2 1,376Nyanza 2.1 37.4 27.4 15.8 11.0 6.4 100.0 7.3 1,389Rift Valley 12.2 28.8 27.8 9.7 16.2 5.3 100.0 7.2 2,262Western 4.1 45.2 22.7 12.7 11.8 3.4 100.0 6.9 927North Eastern 77.7 8.7 5.5 2.9 3.5 1.8 100.0 0.0 184Wealth quintileLowest 31.1 41.7 19.4 4.7 2.4 0.8 100.0 4.9 1,393Second 6.5 46.8 28.1 11.3 6.1 1.2 100.0 6.7 1,483Middle 5.5 35.4 32.2 13.5 11.2 2.2 100.0 7.1 1,613Fourth 4.7 24.7 28.8 17.6 17.6 6.5 100.0 7.6 1,736Highest 2.4 11.3 25.5 12.3 28.4 20.0 100.0 10.2 2,220Total 8.9 29.9 26.9 12.2 14.7 7.3 100.0 7.3 8,4441Completed Grade 8 at the primary lev<strong>el</strong>, for those under age 40; because of the change in the school system in the 1980s,those age 40 and above are considered to have completed primary if they completed Grade 7.2Completed Form 4 at the secondary lev<strong>el</strong>Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 31


Table 3.2.2 Educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by highest lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded or completed, and median grade completed,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNoeducationSomeprimaryHighest lev<strong>el</strong> of schoolingCompletedprimary 1SomesecondaryCompletedsecondary 2More thansecondaryTotalMedianyearscompletedNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 1.9 34.8 21.8 19.6 16.2 5.7 100.0 7.6 1,40615-19 1.0 46.1 18.7 25.0 8.9 0.3 100.0 7.2 77620-24 3.1 20.9 25.6 13.0 25.2 12.3 100.0 8.6 63025-29 3.0 23.1 25.6 11.3 25.3 11.7 100.0 8.0 48330-34 3.9 26.3 26.6 10.6 19.2 13.3 100.0 7.8 46135-39 3.5 18.3 22.8 14.1 27.2 14.2 100.0 9.1 34440-44 6.2 19.4 30.3 11.7 21.3 11.0 100.0 7.6 30645-49 8.2 15.0 31.2 5.4 26.6 13.6 100.0 6.9 257Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 1.4 11.6 16.1 18.3 31.4 21.2 100.0 10.7 866Rural 4.2 32.7 27.8 13.3 16.5 5.5 100.0 7.4 2,392ProvinceNairobi 1.5 5.2 15.2 8.2 37.7 32.2 100.0 11.5 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 1.1 22.3 33.7 13.4 22.0 7.6 100.0 7.8 347Coast 3.1 20.5 27.0 14.3 25.6 9.4 100.0 8.3 252Eastern 1.3 37.0 24.1 15.8 15.3 6.4 100.0 7.4 530Nyanza 0.8 30.5 25.6 17.9 16.1 9.1 100.0 7.7 520Rift Valley 6.0 26.4 23.5 15.8 21.6 6.8 100.0 7.7 885Western 1.7 39.5 27.1 13.3 13.3 5.2 100.0 7.3 349North Eastern 41.2 18.9 14.6 9.8 8.1 7.4 100.0 4.5 62Wealth quintileLowest 12.9 45.0 23.4 9.3 8.0 1.4 100.0 6.4 457Second 1.8 39.7 30.0 12.5 13.5 2.6 100.0 7.1 577Middle 2.4 29.7 31.1 14.1 19.3 3.3 100.0 7.5 574Fourth 2.8 27.3 21.5 19.3 21.0 8.0 100.0 8.0 725Highest 0.9 8.6 20.6 15.2 31.2 23.5 100.0 10.9 926Total 15-49 3.4 27.1 24.7 14.6 20.5 9.7 100.0 7.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 14.2 18.3 34.8 7.6 13.5 11.6 100.0 6.5 207Total m<strong>en</strong>15-54 4.1 26.6 25.3 14.2 20.0 9.8 100.0 7.7 3,4651Completed Grade 8 at the primary lev<strong>el</strong>, for those under age 40; because of the change in the school system in the 1980s,those age 40 and above are considered to have completed primary if they completed Grade 7.2Completed Form 4 at the secondary lev<strong>el</strong>3.3 LITERACYThe ability to read and write is an important personal asset, allowing individuals increasedopportunities in life. Knowing the distribution of the literate population can h<strong>el</strong>p programmemanagers, especially those in health and family planning, decide how to reach wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> withtheir messages. The 2008-09 KDHS assessed the ability to read among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who hadnever be<strong>en</strong> to school or who had att<strong>en</strong>ded only primary school by asking respond<strong>en</strong>ts to read a simple,short s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce. 2 Tables 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 show the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of female and male respond<strong>en</strong>ts,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y, by lev<strong>el</strong> of literacy and overall perc<strong>en</strong>tage of literacy, according to backgroundcharacteristics.Data reveal that the proportion of illiterate wom<strong>en</strong> is double that of m<strong>en</strong>; 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofK<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 cannot read at all, compared with 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in the same age group.Literacy lev<strong>el</strong>s among wom<strong>en</strong> decrease with increasing age, from 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t for wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 to62 perc<strong>en</strong>t for those in the 45-49 age group. This pattern is less pronounced among m<strong>en</strong> as literacy inall age groups is above 85 perc<strong>en</strong>t.2 These s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ces include the following: 1. The child is reading a book. 2. Farming is hard work. 3. Par<strong>en</strong>tsshould care for their childr<strong>en</strong>. 4. The rains were heavy this year.32 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


Literacy lev<strong>el</strong>s for respond<strong>en</strong>ts in urban areas are higher than those in rural areas, and the gapbetwe<strong>en</strong> m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> is narrower. One of every five wom<strong>en</strong> (21 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in North Easternprovince is literate, which is the lowest lev<strong>el</strong> compared with the other provinces that all have lev<strong>el</strong>sabove 72 perc<strong>en</strong>t. The highest literacy lev<strong>el</strong>s are observed among wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi and C<strong>en</strong>tralprovinces (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Literacy lev<strong>el</strong>s for m<strong>en</strong> are also lowest for NorthEastern province (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t), but they are three times the literacy lev<strong>el</strong> among the wom<strong>en</strong> from thisprovince.Wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintile have the lowest lev<strong>el</strong> of literacy (59 perc<strong>en</strong>t) comparedwith those from higher quintiles (e.g., 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t among those in the highest quintile). M<strong>en</strong> from th<strong>el</strong>owest wealth quintile (with a literacy lev<strong>el</strong> of 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are not as disadvantaged as their femalecounterparts.Table 3.3.1 Literacy: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded and lev<strong>el</strong> of literacy, and perc<strong>en</strong>tage literate, according tobackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09No schooling or primary schoolBackgroundcharacteristicSecondaryschool orhigherCan reada wholes<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ceCan readpart of as<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ceCannotreadat allNo cardwithrequiredlanguageBlind/visuallyimpairedMissingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tag<strong>el</strong>iterate 1NumberAge15-19 31.9 51.8 8.3 7.2 0.6 0.0 0.2 100.0 92.0 1,76120-24 38.6 38.9 11.5 10.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 100.0 89.0 1,71525-29 34.6 40.7 12.1 12.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 100.0 87.4 1,45430-34 34.9 38.9 11.4 14.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 100.0 85.2 1,20935-39 33.5 33.9 14.8 16.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 100.0 82.2 87740-44 35.6 30.6 10.6 22.1 0.5 0.6 0.0 100.0 76.8 76845-49 27.0 19.0 16.2 35.2 0.9 1.4 0.3 100.0 62.2 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 57.6 27.8 7.2 6.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 100.0 92.6 2,148Rural 26.3 42.9 13.0 16.7 0.7 0.2 0.1 100.0 82.3 6,296ProvinceNairobi 68.1 20.5 7.3 3.6 0.0 0.1 0.5 100.0 95.8 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 41.4 44.8 9.1 3.9 0.1 0.4 0.3 100.0 95.3 905Coast 28.4 38.7 5.2 27.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 100.0 72.4 674Eastern 28.4 51.1 7.5 12.8 0.0 0.2 0.1 100.0 86.9 1,376Nyanza 33.2 45.1 11.5 9.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 100.0 89.8 1,389Rift Valley 31.2 34.5 16.4 15.9 1.8 0.2 0.0 100.0 82.1 2,262Western 28.0 38.6 17.8 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 100.0 84.4 927North Eastern 8.2 9.0 4.1 78.4 0.0 0.2 0.2 100.0 21.2 184Wealth quintileLowest 7.8 35.3 15.8 38.5 2.2 0.3 0.1 100.0 58.9 1,393Second 18.6 50.6 16.0 14.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 100.0 85.2 1,483Middle 26.9 47.5 12.3 12.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 100.0 86.8 1,613Fourth 41.8 39.5 9.0 9.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 100.0 90.3 1,736Highest 60.8 27.2 7.4 4.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 100.0 95.4 2,220Total 34.3 39.1 11.5 14.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 100.0 84.9 8,4441Refers to wom<strong>en</strong> who att<strong>en</strong>ded secondary school or higher and wom<strong>en</strong> who can read a whole s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce or part of a s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ceCharacteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 33


Table 3.3.2 Literacy: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by lev<strong>el</strong> of schooling att<strong>en</strong>ded and lev<strong>el</strong> of literacy, and perc<strong>en</strong>tage literate, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09No schooling or primary schoolBackgroundcharacteristicSecondaryschool orhigherCan reada wholes<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ceCan readpart of as<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ceCannotreadat allNo cardwithrequiredlanguageBlind/visuallyimpairedMissingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tag<strong>el</strong>iterate 1NumberAge15-19 34.2 51.2 9.4 4.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 100.0 94.8 77620-24 50.4 30.6 10.1 8.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 100.0 91.2 63025-29 48.4 27.0 15.7 7.0 1.3 0.2 0.4 100.0 91.1 48330-34 43.1 34.0 12.8 9.4 0.4 0.0 0.3 100.0 89.9 46135-39 55.4 28.6 9.5 5.3 0.8 0.0 0.4 100.0 93.5 34440-44 44.1 29.9 15.7 9.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 89.7 30645-49 45.6 30.8 8.9 12.8 1.5 0.4 0.0 100.0 85.3 257Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 70.9 20.4 5.4 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 100.0 96.7 866Rural 35.3 40.6 13.7 8.9 1.2 0.1 0.2 100.0 89.6 2,392ProvinceNairobi 78.1 12.5 7.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 100.0 97.7 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 43.0 43.2 7.2 6.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 93.3 347Coast 49.4 42.7 4.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 100.0 97.0 252Eastern 37.6 43.1 14.6 3.9 0.0 0.1 0.7 100.0 95.3 530Nyanza 43.1 38.7 10.0 7.9 0.0 0.2 0.1 100.0 91.8 520Rift Valley 44.1 29.4 14.4 8.9 3.0 0.0 0.1 100.0 88.0 885Western 31.7 41.4 14.9 11.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 100.0 88.0 349North Eastern 25.3 27.5 10.7 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 63.6 62Wealth quintileLowest 18.7 44.5 16.5 17.7 2.4 0.2 0.0 100.0 79.7 457Second 28.6 41.6 21.3 8.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 100.0 91.5 577Middle 36.8 48.4 7.8 5.7 1.1 0.0 0.3 100.0 92.9 574Fourth 48.3 31.8 11.1 7.3 0.8 0.1 0.6 100.0 91.2 725Highest 69.9 21.1 5.6 2.9 0.4 0.0 0.0 100.0 96.7 926Total 15-49 44.8 35.2 11.5 7.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 100.0 91.5 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 32.7 32.9 14.0 18.6 1.4 0.2 0.3 100.0 79.6 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 44.1 35.1 11.7 8.0 0.9 0.1 0.2 100.0 90.8 3,4651Refers to m<strong>en</strong> who att<strong>en</strong>ded secondary school or higher and m<strong>en</strong> who can read a whole s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce or part of a s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce3.4 ACCESS TO MASS MEDIAInformation access is ess<strong>en</strong>tial for increasing people’s knowledge and awar<strong>en</strong>ess of what istaking place around them, which may ev<strong>en</strong>tually affect their perceptions and behaviour. It isimportant to know the types of persons who are more or less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be reached by the media forpurposes of planning programmes int<strong>en</strong>ded to spread information about health and family planning. Inthe survey, exposure to the media was assessed by asking how oft<strong>en</strong> a respond<strong>en</strong>t reads a newspaper,watches t<strong>el</strong>evision, or list<strong>en</strong>s to a radio. Tables 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 show the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and ofm<strong>en</strong> who were exposed to differ<strong>en</strong>t types of media by age, urban or rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce, province, lev<strong>el</strong> ofeducation, and wealth quintile.As has be<strong>en</strong> the case in previous surveys, m<strong>en</strong> have more access to all forms of mass mediathan wom<strong>en</strong>. For example, only 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> read a newspaper at least once a week,compared with 46 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> (Figure 3.1). The tables show that radio is the most popular mediumfor both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, while newspapers are the least popular medium. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong>who are not exposed to any type of media at least once a week g<strong>en</strong>erally increases gradually with age.The largest proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who do not have access to any media at least once a week are thoseage 45-49 (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among m<strong>en</strong>, those age 15-19 are the largest proportion with no access to anyform of media at least once a week.34 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


Table 3.4.1 Exposure to mass media: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are exposed to specific media on a weekly basis, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicReads anewspaperat least oncea weekWatchest<strong>el</strong>evisionat least oncea weekList<strong>en</strong>s tothe radioat least oncea weekAll threemediaat least oncea weekNo mediaat least oncea weekNumberAge15-19 26.3 31.6 76.6 14.0 19.5 1,76120-24 27.3 37.2 80.6 17.7 15.8 1,71525-29 26.2 39.4 78.5 20.7 18.0 1,45430-34 24.4 31.7 77.0 15.9 19.1 1,20935-39 22.5 34.5 73.9 16.2 20.3 87740-44 20.0 33.0 76.0 15.5 21.3 76845-49 14.2 26.7 70.7 10.4 26.6 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 49.2 69.3 83.1 41.5 9.3 2,148Rural 15.8 22.1 74.9 7.6 22.6 6,296ProvinceNairobi 59.1 86.1 87.8 52.5 5.0 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 22.9 44.7 91.0 14.6 6.3 905Coast 25.7 34.6 65.2 16.7 28.3 674Eastern 14.0 23.8 68.7 8.1 27.6 1,376Nyanza 24.6 26.8 80.5 12.9 15.0 1,389Rift Valley 23.6 30.2 77.1 16.7 20.7 2,262Western 17.4 23.4 80.4 7.6 16.4 927North Eastern 6.9 9.5 25.7 4.3 71.9 184EducationNo education 0.8 8.6 35.4 0.3 62.3 752Primary incomplete 6.9 16.3 72.3 2.6 24.9 2,526Primary complete 16.3 32.0 83.1 8.7 13.8 2,272Secondary+ 51.9 58.0 87.2 38.3 7.4 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 4.3 2.9 42.3 0.4 56.3 1,393Second 9.7 6.8 77.5 1.5 20.3 1,483Middle 15.1 19.8 84.9 5.2 13.5 1,613Fourth 24.6 42.1 85.3 15.0 11.1 1,736Highest 53.0 76.1 86.2 45.1 5.9 2,220Total 24.3 34.1 77.0 16.3 19.2 8,444Urban wom<strong>en</strong> have more access to all forms of mass media compared with their ruralcounterparts; for example, only 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in rural areas read a newspaper at least once aweek, compared with 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in urban areas. Although 69 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in urbanareas watch t<strong>el</strong>evision at least once a week, only 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those residing in rural areas do so.Access to all three forms of mass media is highest among resid<strong>en</strong>ts of Nairobi and lowest amongresid<strong>en</strong>ts of North Eastern province for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>.Access to mass media increases with educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t and wealth quintile for bothwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>. For example, the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who list<strong>en</strong> to the radio at least once a weekincreases from 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education to 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with at least somesecondary schooling. Similarly, the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who watch t<strong>el</strong>evision at least once a weekincreases from only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in the poorest wealth quintile to 76 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in thehighest quintile.The perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who access all three types of mass media at least once a week hasincreased since 2003 from 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t to 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t for wom<strong>en</strong> age 15 to 49 and from 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t to31 perc<strong>en</strong>t for m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 35


Table 3.4.2 Exposure to mass media: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are exposed to specific media on a weekly basis, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicReads anewspaperat least oncea weekWatchest<strong>el</strong>evisionat least oncea weekList<strong>en</strong>s tothe radioat least oncea weekAll threemediaat least oncea weekNo mediaat least oncea weekNumberAge15-19 37.9 40.2 87.2 20.9 8.7 77620-24 48.4 53.7 90.9 33.5 4.7 63025-29 48.6 54.4 90.9 35.5 6.5 48330-34 47.2 53.5 90.0 35.8 6.5 46135-39 51.2 56.8 92.3 41.2 5.9 34440-44 49.7 45.9 92.6 31.4 5.2 30645-49 46.9 44.2 90.1 28.4 6.4 257Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 72.5 78.3 92.5 59.9 1.7 866Rural 36.5 38.9 89.3 21.0 8.2 2,392ProvinceNairobi 84.5 89.7 92.9 75.0 0.3 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 63.3 57.6 95.0 43.0 1.4 347Coast 40.1 41.2 87.9 23.0 9.5 252Eastern 39.6 39.6 88.4 21.4 7.4 530Nyanza 45.8 49.6 95.4 29.4 2.9 520Rift Valley 38.0 45.9 87.1 26.0 10.0 885Western 32.8 38.2 87.5 20.6 9.0 349North Eastern 25.9 26.5 85.9 17.4 12.0 62EducationNo education 0.7 15.4 63.3 0.0 32.3 112Primary incomplete 19.4 28.6 86.0 7.8 12.0 883Primary complete 39.5 43.7 92.2 22.5 5.5 804Secondary+ 69.3 67.7 93.6 52.9 1.7 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 15.3 16.8 75.2 5.0 23.9 457Second 23.7 22.0 90.1 7.8 7.6 577Middle 42.7 38.6 93.3 21.3 4.1 574Fourth 48.9 56.9 92.4 32.2 4.4 725Highest 74.9 83.3 93.7 64.6 0.3 926Total 15-49 46.1 49.4 90.1 31.3 6.5 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 40.3 41.2 84.6 25.9 8.8 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 45.7 48.9 89.8 31.0 6.6 3,465Figure 3.1 Access to Mass Media100Perc<strong>en</strong>t9080776046494020243416310ReadsnewspaperweeklyWatchest<strong>el</strong>evisionweeklyList<strong>en</strong>s toradioweeklyAll threemediaWom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0936 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


3.5 EMPLOYMENTRespond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked whether they were employed at the time of the survey and, if not,whether they were employed in the 12 months that preceded the survey. Because employm<strong>en</strong>t isviewed as a stock concept (measured at a particular point in time), the corresponding statistics must,in principle, refer to a precise instant in time. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts are asked a number of questions to <strong>el</strong>icittheir curr<strong>en</strong>t employm<strong>en</strong>t status and continuity of employm<strong>en</strong>t in the 12 months prior to the survey.Employed individuals are those who say that they are curr<strong>en</strong>tly working (i.e., worked or h<strong>el</strong>d a job inthe past 7 days) and those who worked at any time during the 12 months prior to the survey (referredto as usual employm<strong>en</strong>t).Table 3.5.1 Employm<strong>en</strong>t status: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by employm<strong>en</strong>t status, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicEmployed in the12 months precedingthe surveyCurr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployed 1Notcurr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployedNotemployedin the12 monthsprecedingthe surveyTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 19.3 1.8 78.9 100.0 1,76120-24 50.5 3.7 45.7 100.0 1,71525-29 66.6 3.1 30.3 100.0 1,45430-34 71.4 2.1 26.5 100.0 1,20935-39 73.7 1.5 24.8 100.0 87740-44 78.7 1.8 19.5 100.0 76845-49 74.2 1.3 24.5 100.0 661Marital statusNever married 35.4 1.8 62.8 100.0 2,634Married or living together 63.9 2.7 33.4 100.0 4,928Divorced/separated/widowed 79.5 2.2 18.3 100.0 881Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 31.8 1.9 66.3 100.0 2,3971-2 61.9 3.1 35.0 100.0 2,5793-4 70.5 2.1 27.4 100.0 1,8995+ 69.1 2.2 28.7 100.0 1,569Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 59.7 2.2 38.1 100.0 2,148Rural 55.5 2.5 42.0 100.0 6,296ProvinceNairobi 58.5 2.4 39.2 100.0 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 66.4 2.5 31.1 100.0 905Coast 48.3 4.2 47.5 100.0 674Eastern 55.4 4.4 40.1 100.0 1,376Nyanza 65.6 1.7 32.5 100.0 1,389Rift Valley 57.6 1.8 40.6 100.0 2,262Western 45.2 0.9 54.0 100.0 927North Eastern 17.1 0.3 82.6 100.0 184EducationNo education 50.6 3.0 46.4 100.0 752Primary incomplete 52.7 2.6 44.7 100.0 2,526Primary complete 60.1 2.9 37.0 100.0 2,272Secondary+ 58.8 1.7 39.5 100.0 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 48.4 3.6 48.0 100.0 1,393Second 54.0 1.7 44.2 100.0 1,483Middle 57.2 2.1 40.7 100.0 1,613Fourth 55.8 2.4 41.8 100.0 1,736Highest 63.7 2.3 34.1 100.0 2,220Total 56.6 2.4 41.0 100.0 8,4441‘Curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed’ is defined as having done work in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days. Includespersons who did not work in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days but who are regularly employed and wereabs<strong>en</strong>t from work for leave, illness, vacation, or any other such reason.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 37


Table 3.5.2 Employm<strong>en</strong>t status: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by employm<strong>en</strong>t status, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicEmployed in the12 months precedingthe surveyCurr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployed 1Notcurr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployedNotemployedin the12 monthsprecedingthe surveyTotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 59.9 3.9 36.3 100.0 77620-24 86.9 2.8 10.3 100.0 63025-29 97.4 0.7 1.9 100.0 48330-34 95.4 2.5 2.1 100.0 46135-39 98.6 0.5 0.9 100.0 34440-44 98.6 1.0 0.4 100.0 30645-49 97.9 0.9 1.2 100.0 257Marital statusNever married 73.8 3.0 23.2 100.0 1,524Married or living together 97.8 1.2 0.9 100.0 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 94.4 3.1 2.5 100.0 142Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 75.3 3.0 21.7 100.0 1,6261-2 97.2 1.1 1.7 100.0 6913-4 97.2 1.7 1.1 100.0 5595+ 98.5 1.1 0.4 100.0 381Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 85.8 1.5 12.7 100.0 866Rural 86.7 2.4 11.0 100.0 2,392ProvinceNairobi 86.7 1.3 12.0 100.0 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 91.4 2.0 6.7 100.0 347Coast 79.6 1.4 19.0 100.0 252Eastern 94.2 0.3 5.6 100.0 530Nyanza 83.2 5.7 11.0 100.0 520Rift Valley 86.2 1.2 12.6 100.0 885Western 84.5 2.5 13.0 100.0 349North Eastern 59.8 7.3 33.0 100.0 62EducationNo education 93.7 3.2 3.1 100.0 112Primary incomplete 81.7 3.2 15.1 100.0 883Primary complete 93.9 0.7 5.4 100.0 804Secondary+ 84.6 2.2 13.2 100.0 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 82.6 3.3 14.1 100.0 457Second 86.1 2.2 11.7 100.0 577Middle 89.0 1.8 9.2 100.0 574Fourth 85.1 1.9 13.0 100.0 725Highest 88.0 1.8 10.2 100.0 926Total 15-49 86.4 2.1 11.4 100.0 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 97.6 1.5 1.0 100.0 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 87.1 2.1 10.8 100.0 3,4651‘Curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed’ is defined as having done work in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days. Includespersons who did not work in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days but who are regularly employed and wereabs<strong>en</strong>t from work for leave, illness, vacation, or any other such reason.Tables 3.5.1 and 3.5.2 and Figure 3.2 show the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of adult wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>according to curr<strong>en</strong>t and usual employm<strong>en</strong>t. As shown, 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 are categorised as curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> curr<strong>en</strong>tly employedincreases with age up to 44 years and th<strong>en</strong> declines slightly for those in the 45-49 age group. The dataon m<strong>en</strong> show little variation with age over age 25 or by type of place of resid<strong>en</strong>ce, education lev<strong>el</strong>, orwealth status. The proportion of curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> increases with number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong> except for wom<strong>en</strong> with five or more childr<strong>en</strong>.38 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


Figure 3.2 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Employm<strong>en</strong>t Status in the Past 12 MonthsCurr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployed Lab<strong>el</strong>57%Not curr<strong>en</strong>tlyemployed butworked in Lab<strong>el</strong> past12 months 2%2%DidLab<strong>el</strong>not workin past41%12 months41%K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Curr<strong>en</strong>t employm<strong>en</strong>t status for wom<strong>en</strong> by province shows that wom<strong>en</strong> from North Easternprovince have the least chance of being employed (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t are curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed) and those fromC<strong>en</strong>tral and Nyanza have the highest proportions employed (66 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Wom<strong>en</strong> who are divorced,separated, or widowed have the highest proportions employed (80 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by those whoare married (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and only 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the never-married are employed. There is littlevariation in employm<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> by urban or rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce.3.6 OCCUPATIONThe term occupation refers to the job h<strong>el</strong>d or the kind of work performed during the refer<strong>en</strong>ceperiod. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts who were curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed were asked to state their occupation, and theresults are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Tables 3.6.1 and 3.6.2 for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y. Thirty-nine perc<strong>en</strong>tof working wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 are <strong>en</strong>gaged in agricultural occupations, a drop from the49 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y, recorded in 2003. The next major occupation category amongworking wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> is that of professional, technical, or managerial occupations, which accountsfor 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t of working wom<strong>en</strong> and 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t of working m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49. Among employedwom<strong>en</strong>, the next largest category is sales and services, accounting for 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t of employm<strong>en</strong>t,followed by domestic service (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and skilled manual labour (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among working m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49, however, 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t are employed in unskilled manual jobs, while 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t each areemployed in sales and services and skilled manual jobs.There has be<strong>en</strong> a shift in the distribution by occupation since 2003. The proportion ofworking wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who are employed in professional, technical, and managerial occupationsappears to have increased since 2003 as the proportion employed in agriculture has declined.Occupations in the sales and services sector accounted for a larger share of employm<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 thanin 2008-09.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 39


Table 3.6.1 Occupation: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 employed in the 12 months preceding the survey by occupation, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicProfessional/technical/managerialClericalSales andservicesSkilledmanualUnskilledmanualDomesticserviceAgricultureMissing TotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 12.9 0.4 11.2 6.6 3.0 14.6 49.9 1.4 100.0 37120-24 31.5 2.2 16.0 6.9 1.4 10.3 31.4 0.4 100.0 93125-29 29.4 3.6 13.6 8.8 2.9 7.9 33.3 0.6 100.0 1,01430-34 34.0 1.4 13.5 4.8 3.2 3.4 39.5 0.3 100.0 88935-39 31.7 3.3 12.8 4.4 2.7 4.6 39.8 0.7 100.0 65940-44 36.8 1.7 8.2 4.0 2.5 6.1 40.7 0.1 100.0 61845-49 27.9 1.2 8.9 4.0 1.8 3.8 52.5 0.0 100.0 499Marital statusNever married 28.6 4.7 11.8 8.9 2.8 16.3 26.1 0.9 100.0 980Married or living together 32.4 1.7 12.2 5.2 1.9 2.9 43.3 0.4 100.0 3,280Divorced/separated/widowed 24.4 0.8 15.6 5.0 4.6 12.8 36.6 0.1 100.0 720Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 30.6 5.0 12.1 7.5 2.0 14.7 27.2 0.9 100.0 8071-2 32.4 3.1 15.7 7.1 1.9 7.2 32.1 0.6 100.0 1,6763-4 31.6 1.1 12.0 4.8 2.9 5.0 42.3 0.2 100.0 1,3795+ 26.0 0.2 9.0 4.4 3.1 3.4 53.7 0.2 100.0 1,118Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 45.7 6.5 18.0 5.4 3.3 14.5 5.9 0.7 100.0 1,330Rural 24.9 0.6 10.6 6.1 2.2 4.2 51.0 0.4 100.0 3,650ProvinceNairobi 45.4 10.2 14.6 4.9 5.7 15.0 2.7 1.5 100.0 443C<strong>en</strong>tral 19.9 1.4 12.5 5.3 2.8 6.2 51.5 0.5 100.0 624Coast 38.1 5.8 16.2 6.0 2.1 13.2 18.7 0.0 100.0 354Eastern 22.0 0.6 8.8 1.5 3.1 6.8 56.9 0.4 100.0 824Nyanza 27.5 0.7 12.8 5.4 1.1 4.4 47.9 0.3 100.0 936Rift Valley 33.0 1.5 14.0 8.4 1.5 5.1 36.1 0.4 100.0 1,343Western 37.3 0.6 9.9 10.1 3.8 5.2 33.0 0.1 100.0 427North Eastern 52.5 3.2 16.4 0.3 2.3 23.8 0.0 1.6 100.0 32EducationNo education 24.2 0.4 13.1 10.5 5.4 5.8 40.5 0.1 100.0 403Primary incomplete 21.4 0.0 11.9 2.8 2.8 6.4 54.5 0.3 100.0 1,395Primary complete 24.1 0.5 13.1 10.1 2.2 8.9 40.5 0.6 100.0 1,431Secondary+ 44.4 5.7 12.6 3.9 1.8 6.1 25.0 0.5 100.0 1,751Wealth quintileLowest 18.3 0.0 8.5 7.1 4.0 4.0 58.1 0.1 100.0 725Second 24.6 0.2 8.9 5.1 2.2 4.3 54.4 0.3 100.0 827Middle 20.1 0.8 8.2 6.6 1.8 3.8 58.4 0.2 100.0 956Fourth 32.0 0.9 13.3 6.5 1.3 4.9 40.5 0.5 100.0 1,010Highest 45.5 6.2 19.2 4.9 3.1 13.4 7.0 0.8 100.0 1,463Total 30.5 2.2 12.6 5.9 2.5 7.0 39.0 0.4 100.0 4,98140 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


Table 3.6.2 Occupation: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 employed in the 12 months preceding the survey by occupation, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicProfessional/technical/managerialClericalSales andservicesSkilledmanualUnskilledmanualDomesticserviceAgricultureMissing TotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 2.8 0.0 5.5 3.3 9.7 2.3 56.6 19.9 100.0 49520-24 15.6 0.3 10.9 9.4 13.7 2.9 44.2 2.8 100.0 56525-29 24.5 1.0 13.5 8.5 18.5 4.6 29.5 0.0 100.0 47430-34 22.3 1.3 7.8 14.0 20.1 2.6 31.9 0.0 100.0 45135-39 31.9 2.2 7.5 7.8 18.9 1.5 30.3 0.0 100.0 34140-44 25.0 1.5 10.7 9.1 15.1 2.2 36.5 0.0 100.0 30545-49 22.2 1.3 8.5 7.3 13.0 4.5 42.9 0.1 100.0 254Marital statusNever married 10.0 0.7 9.5 6.3 11.8 3.1 49.0 9.6 100.0 1,169Married or living together 26.8 1.3 9.0 9.7 18.1 2.7 32.4 0.1 100.0 1,578Divorced/separated/widowed 14.3 0.3 11.2 14.4 17.1 4.2 38.4 0.1 100.0 138Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 12.8 0.6 9.7 6.3 11.8 3.6 46.4 8.8 100.0 1,2731-2 28.7 1.4 8.8 10.6 18.2 2.8 29.2 0.3 100.0 6793-4 24.1 1.7 9.7 11.6 20.0 2.0 30.9 0.1 100.0 5535+ 17.9 0.4 8.4 7.5 16.9 2.2 46.6 0.0 100.0 380Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 39.1 2.6 13.4 11.0 22.1 5.6 4.3 1.9 100.0 756Rural 12.4 0.4 7.9 7.6 13.2 1.9 51.9 4.7 100.0 2,129ProvinceNairobi 38.1 5.8 12.6 15.7 20.0 5.4 2.2 0.2 100.0 276C<strong>en</strong>tral 14.7 0.0 11.4 9.7 20.4 2.5 40.9 0.4 100.0 324Coast 30.6 2.2 17.9 11.8 15.8 8.0 13.8 0.0 100.0 204Eastern 14.4 0.1 5.8 3.4 7.2 5.2 43.5 20.4 100.0 500Nyanza 14.4 0.9 6.8 10.9 15.1 0.9 49.6 1.3 100.0 462Rift Valley 21.2 0.3 10.1 5.1 15.5 1.3 46.2 0.3 100.0 774Western 8.9 0.0 5.0 12.3 20.3 1.5 51.8 0.3 100.0 303North Eastern 36.5 1.4 15.3 5.1 17.2 0.0 21.9 2.6 100.0 41EducationNo education 9.9 0.0 9.7 8.6 12.5 2.4 57.0 0.0 100.0 108Primary incomplete 4.9 0.1 9.1 6.8 16.8 2.9 53.6 5.8 100.0 749Primary complete 10.1 0.4 12.7 13.8 17.7 2.4 39.8 2.9 100.0 761Secondary+ 34.4 1.9 7.3 6.3 13.7 3.3 29.2 3.9 100.0 1,266Wealth quintileLowest 8.2 0.3 5.5 6.0 14.5 1.2 58.6 5.7 100.0 392Second 10.0 0.5 5.8 8.9 13.1 1.3 56.6 3.8 100.0 509Middle 7.6 0.0 6.3 7.7 15.8 1.2 55.3 6.0 100.0 521Fourth 16.3 0.9 11.9 7.0 12.7 4.5 42.7 4.0 100.0 631Highest 40.2 2.2 13.1 11.1 19.5 4.5 7.4 2.0 100.0 832Total 15-49 19.4 1.0 9.3 8.5 15.5 2.9 39.4 4.0 100.0 2,885M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 28.2 1.8 8.1 6.4 7.0 1.1 46.9 0.4 100.0 205Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 20.0 1.0 9.2 8.4 15.0 2.8 39.9 3.7 100.0 3,0903.7 EARNINGS AND TYPE OF EMPLOYMENTTable 3.7 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of employed wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by type of earningsand employer characteristics, according to type of employm<strong>en</strong>t (agricultural or non-agricultural).Sev<strong>en</strong>ty-five perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> receive cash for their work. This is similar to the perc<strong>en</strong>tage recordedin 2003. Almost one-quarter of working wom<strong>en</strong> are not paid (Figure 3.3). Wom<strong>en</strong> employed inagricultural work are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be unpaid and much less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be paid in cash only,compared with wom<strong>en</strong> employed in non-agricultural occupations.More than three in five working wom<strong>en</strong> (62 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are s<strong>el</strong>f-employed. Thirty perc<strong>en</strong>t areemployed by a non-family member, and 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t are employed by a family member. Those workingin agricultural jobs are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be s<strong>el</strong>f-employed or employed by a family member than arewom<strong>en</strong> working in non-agricultural jobs.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 41


Table 3.7 Type of employm<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 employed in the 12 monthspreceding the survey by type of earnings, type of employer, and continuity ofemploym<strong>en</strong>t, according to type of employm<strong>en</strong>t (agricultural or nonagricultural),K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Employm<strong>en</strong>tcharacteristicAgriculturalworkNonagriculturalworkTotalType of earningsCash only 33.2 84.6 64.5Cash and in-kind 14.7 8.3 10.7In-kind only 3.7 0.5 1.7Not paid 48.5 6.7 23.0Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Type of employerEmployed by family member 16.8 3.4 8.7Employed by non-family member 14.8 39.1 29.6S<strong>el</strong>f-employed 68.3 57.4 61.6Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Continuity of employm<strong>en</strong>tAll year 49.9 70.1 62.2Seasonal 44.9 23.4 31.7Occasional 5.2 6.5 6.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> employedduring the last 12 months 1,941 3,017 4,981Note: Total includes wom<strong>en</strong> with information missing on type of employm<strong>en</strong>twho are not shown separat<strong>el</strong>y.Figure 3.3 Employm<strong>en</strong>t Characteristics among Working Wom<strong>en</strong>Type of earningsCash onlyCash and in-kindIn-kind onlyNot paid2112365Type of employerEmployed by family memberEmployed by non-family memberS<strong>el</strong>f-employed93062Continuity of employm<strong>en</strong>tAll yearSeasonalOccasional632620 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80Perc<strong>en</strong>tK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Sixty-two perc<strong>en</strong>t of working wom<strong>en</strong> are employed all year; another 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t have seasonaljobs and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t work only occasionally. Wom<strong>en</strong> who are <strong>en</strong>gaged in non-agricultural work(70 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more assured of continuity in employm<strong>en</strong>t than those <strong>en</strong>gaged in agriculturalactivities, whose employm<strong>en</strong>t is more prone to consist of seasonal work.42 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


3.8 HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGEMedical insurance provides peace of mind, and most important, necessary care to save the lifeand/or w<strong>el</strong>l-being of the <strong>en</strong>rolee. In the 2008-09 KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> were asked if they werecovered by any health insurance and, if so, what type of insurance. Results shown in Figure 3.4indicate that few K<strong>en</strong>yans have health insurance. Only 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age15-49 are covered by medical insurance. The largest category of insurance is employer-based policies.Figure 3.4 Health Insurance CoverageSocial security12Employer-based insurance48Privat<strong>el</strong>y purchased commercial insurance12Any insurance7110 5 10 15Perc<strong>en</strong>tWom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong>K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-093.9 KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES CONCERNING TUBERCULOSISThe 2008-09 KDHS collected data on wom<strong>en</strong>’s and m<strong>en</strong>’s knowledge and attitudesconcerning tuberculosis (TB). Tables 3.8.1 and 3.8.2 show the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> whohave heard of TB, and among those who have heard of TB, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who know that TB isspread through air by coughing, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who b<strong>el</strong>ieve that TB can be cured, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho would want a family member’s TB to be kept a secret.Results show that awar<strong>en</strong>ess of TB is almost universal in K<strong>en</strong>ya; 98 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and99 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> have heard about TB. Moreover, knowledge of other aspects of TB is alsowidespread. Sev<strong>en</strong>ty-six perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of TBknow that it is spread through the air by coughing, and 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>know that TB can be cured. Finally, stigma r<strong>el</strong>ated to TB is not so common in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Only one infour wom<strong>en</strong> and less than one in t<strong>en</strong> m<strong>en</strong> say that, if a family member had TB, they would want tokeep it a secret.Differ<strong>en</strong>ces by background characteristics show that, as expected, rural wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> ar<strong>el</strong>ess lik<strong>el</strong>y than urban resid<strong>en</strong>ts to know that TB is spread through the air by coughing and to b<strong>el</strong>ievethat TB can be cured. Among wom<strong>en</strong> who have heard about TB, wom<strong>en</strong> in Coast province are leastlik<strong>el</strong>y to know that TB is spread through the air by coughing (66 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while those in Nyanzaprovince are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to want a family member’s TB kept a secret. Similarly, m<strong>en</strong> in Coastprovince are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to know that TB is spread through the air by coughing, and m<strong>en</strong> in Easternprovince are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to want a family member’s TB kept a secret.Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 43


Table 3.8.1 Knowledge and attitude concerning tuberculosis: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of tuberculosis (TB), and among wom<strong>en</strong> who have heard ofTB, the perc<strong>en</strong>tages who know that TB is spread through the air by coughing, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who b<strong>el</strong>ieve thatTB can be cured, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who would want to keep secret that a family member has TB, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong all respond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho haveheard of TBNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreport that TB isspread throughthe air bycoughingAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts who have heard of TBPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho b<strong>el</strong>ievethat TB canbe curedPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho wouldwant a familymember’s TBkept secretNumberAge15-19 96.6 1,761 74.4 81.4 33.4 1,70120-24 98.3 1,715 75.7 89.8 25.8 1,68725-29 98.5 1,454 74.2 89.7 20.5 1,43230-34 98.5 1,209 79.2 94.1 22.0 1,19035-39 98.8 877 78.6 93.8 20.6 86740-44 99.4 768 81.0 90.6 17.9 76345-49 98.7 661 71.7 91.1 24.7 652Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 99.1 2,148 85.2 92.2 24.3 2,128Rural 97.9 6,296 73.0 88.3 24.6 6,164ProvinceNairobi 98.5 728 90.1 96.6 19.2 717C<strong>en</strong>tral 99.5 905 81.5 91.3 29.0 900Coast 98.9 674 65.9 93.6 20.3 666Eastern 98.9 1,376 72.4 87.1 20.4 1,361Nyanza 97.9 1,389 77.0 89.4 33.2 1,359Rift Valley 97.4 2,262 75.3 87.8 24.1 2,203Western 97.4 927 73.3 84.1 23.0 902North Eastern 99.3 184 79.3 94.2 17.8 183EducationNo education 94.2 752 58.4 84.9 20.4 709Primary incomplete 96.9 2,526 64.8 83.5 28.2 2,449Primary complete 99.4 2,272 77.5 90.1 26.4 2,258Secondary+ 99.4 2,894 89.2 94.7 20.9 2,877Wealth quintileLowest 95.8 1,393 62.7 83.9 20.7 1,334Second 98.2 1,483 71.2 87.3 24.2 1,456Middle 99.0 1,613 74.1 87.7 27.7 1,597Fourth 98.3 1,736 80.9 91.0 25.7 1,707Highest 99.0 2,220 85.5 93.7 23.8 2,198Total 98.2 8,444 76.2 89.3 24.5 8,29244 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


Table 3.8.2 Knowledge and attitude concerning tuberculosis: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of tuberculosis (TB), and among m<strong>en</strong> who have heard of TB, theperc<strong>en</strong>tages who know that TB is spread through the air by coughing, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who b<strong>el</strong>ieve that TB canbe cured, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who would want to keep secret that a family member has TB, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong all respond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho haveheard of TBNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreport that TB isspread throughthe air bycoughingAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts who have heard of TBPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho b<strong>el</strong>ievethat TB canbe curedPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho wouldwant a familymember’s TBkept secretNumberAge15-19 98.5 776 79.6 87.8 14.2 76520-24 96.8 630 80.0 92.5 10.8 61025-29 99.2 483 77.4 93.5 4.8 47930-34 99.6 461 79.1 93.9 8.5 45935-39 99.9 344 87.0 90.9 5.5 34440-44 99.9 306 80.7 91.2 5.6 30645-49 99.2 257 81.9 94.3 8.2 255Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 99.8 866 88.4 95.8 8.3 864Rural 98.4 2,392 77.4 90.0 9.4 2,353ProvinceNairobi 99.7 314 94.4 95.6 6.8 313C<strong>en</strong>tral 99.3 347 76.6 89.3 9.9 344Coast 100.0 252 73.7 96.7 5.5 252Eastern 99.6 530 85.1 91.6 16.6 528Nyanza 99.3 520 84.4 91.9 9.0 516Rift Valley 97.8 885 75.4 90.8 5.8 866Western 96.7 349 76.1 87.0 11.2 337North Eastern 100.0 62 74.9 96.7 1.9 62EducationNo education 91.7 112 66.9 84.3 5.7 103Primary incomplete 97.4 883 71.9 87.2 10.7 860Primary complete 99.1 804 78.0 92.9 9.3 797Secondary+ 100.0 1,459 87.5 94.0 8.3 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 96.8 457 75.0 89.5 5.0 442Second 98.1 577 75.9 90.6 9.8 566Middle 98.9 574 79.2 89.2 10.2 567Fourth 99.5 725 79.5 90.6 10.9 721Highest 99.5 926 87.0 95.4 8.6 922Total 15-49 98.8 3,258 80.3 91.6 9.1 3,218M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 98.5 207 72.8 93.5 8.4 204Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 98.8 3,465 79.9 91.7 9.1 3,422Among wom<strong>en</strong> who have heard about TB, those with no education (58 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and those inthe lowest wealth quintile (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to know that TB is spread through the air bycoughing than wom<strong>en</strong> with some education and those in the higher wealth quintiles. Similarly, amongm<strong>en</strong> who have heard about TB, m<strong>en</strong> with no education (67 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and in the lowest wealth quintile(75 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to know that TB is spread through the air by coughing than m<strong>en</strong> with someeducation and those in the higher wealth quintiles.3.10 SMOKINGIn order to measure the ext<strong>en</strong>t of smoking among K<strong>en</strong>yan adults, wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who wereinterviewed in the 2008-09 KDHS were asked if they curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoked cigarettes or used tobacco.Less than 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> said they used tobacco of any kind, and less than 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t said theysmoked cigarettes (data not shown). Ninete<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 use tobacco products, with18 perc<strong>en</strong>t saying that they smoke cigarettes. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who smoke is too small toshow details, but differ<strong>en</strong>tials in smoking among m<strong>en</strong> can be shown (Table 3.9).Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts | 45


Table 3.9 Use of tobacco: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who smoke cigarettes or a pipe or use other tobacco products and the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of cigarette smokersby number of cigarettes smoked in preceding 24 hours, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic Cigarettes PipeOthertobaccoDoesnot use Numbertobacco of m<strong>en</strong>Number of cigarettes in the last 24 hoursDon’tknow/0 1-2 3-5 6-9 10+ missingTotalNumberofcigarettesmokersAge15-19 2.7 0.0 0.3 97.1 776 * * * * * * 100.0 2120-24 15.1 0.4 1.5 84.3 630 0.0 19.0 45.4 11.4 23.8 0.5 100.0 9525-29 20.1 1.1 2.2 78.9 483 0.0 25.3 33.9 16.9 23.3 0.6 100.0 9730-34 25.5 1.6 3.4 73.1 461 0.0 19.9 31.9 14.3 32.2 1.7 100.0 11835-39 24.5 1.7 4.1 73.2 344 0.4 8.6 44.2 8.2 38.6 0.0 100.0 8440-44 25.9 3.0 4.7 71.2 306 3.8 15.3 36.5 15.8 28.6 0.0 100.0 7945-49 29.6 2.7 9.1 66.2 257 1.1 10.4 27.5 25.3 35.5 0.2 100.0 76Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 17.2 0.3 0.8 82.7 866 1.7 12.3 28.6 19.4 36.1 1.9 100.0 149Rural 17.6 1.5 3.5 80.6 2,392 0.6 19.7 38.3 14.1 27.0 0.4 100.0 421ProvinceNairobi 17.1 0.7 0.9 82.7 314 3.2 2.5 39.6 18.0 36.4 0.3 100.0 54C<strong>en</strong>tral 30.4 2.4 2.2 69.3 347 0.0 16.7 41.6 16.3 25.0 0.4 100.0 105Coast 22.6 0.0 1.8 76.3 252 0.0 24.5 19.2 11.9 44.3 0.0 100.0 57Eastern 26.0 0.0 4.6 72.8 530 0.6 22.2 31.8 23.2 22.2 0.0 100.0 138Nyanza 7.9 0.0 2.0 91.1 520 (0.0) (35.2) (34.1) (11.2) (11.8) (7.7) 100.0 41Rift Valley 14.3 2.7 3.8 82.9 885 0.6 10.7 41.6 9.4 37.2 0.5 100.0 127Western 11.2 0.0 1.4 88.3 349 4.4 23.7 40.1 10.7 21.2 0.0 100.0 39North Eastern 15.6 4.4 2.4 82.8 62 (0.0) (4.5) (16.6) (20.8) (58.1) (0.0) 100.0 10EducationNo education 19.8 1.2 18.3 68.4 112 (0.0) (13.8) (38.7) (1.8) (45.8) (0.0) 100.0 22Primary incomplete 19.1 2.3 4.0 79.1 883 1.5 17.4 41.3 15.8 24.0 0.0 100.0 169Primary complete 19.8 1.0 3.0 78.7 804 0.5 15.7 37.6 14.4 31.9 0.0 100.0 160Secondary+ 15.1 0.5 0.7 84.7 1,459 0.8 19.9 29.9 17.4 30.1 2.0 100.0 220Wealth quintileLowest 16.7 2.9 6.3 78.6 457 1.1 31.3 38.1 6.7 22.8 0.0 100.0 76Second 17.1 1.0 3.9 81.4 577 0.8 20.6 26.9 18.2 32.5 1.2 100.0 99Middle 19.3 1.6 3.8 79.3 574 0.8 9.8 52.7 12.5 23.8 0.4 100.0 110Fourth 19.6 0.9 1.8 79.7 725 0.6 19.8 30.7 15.3 33.5 0.0 100.0 142Highest 15.4 0.2 0.4 84.5 926 1.2 12.6 32.5 20.8 30.9 2.0 100.0 143Total 15-49 17.5 1.1 2.8 81.1 3,258 0.9 17.7 35.8 15.5 29.4 0.8 100.0 570M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 28.6 5.1 9.7 62.2 207 0.0 11.2 26.3 26.1 36.4 0.0 100.0 59Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 18.2 1.4 3.2 80.0 3,465 0.8 17.1 34.9 16.5 30.0 0.7 100.0 630Note: Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted casesthat has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.M<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealth quintile and those with secondary and higher education are lesslik<strong>el</strong>y to smoke cigarettes than are m<strong>en</strong> with less education and in the lower wealth quintiles. This isin contrast to what was recorded in 2003, where m<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintile and with noeducation were reported to be less lik<strong>el</strong>y to smoke cigarettes. In addition, m<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealthquintile are more lik<strong>el</strong>y not to use tobacco products (85 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than m<strong>en</strong> in the lower wealthquintiles. Convers<strong>el</strong>y, in 2003, m<strong>en</strong> in the lowest and middle wealth quintiles were reported as lesslik<strong>el</strong>y to use tobacco products (77 perc<strong>en</strong>t did not use).Among the provinces, m<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province have the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of smoking cigarettes,whereas m<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province have the lowest lev<strong>el</strong> of smoking. In 2003, m<strong>en</strong> in Eastern provincehad the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of smoking. M<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza have over time continued to be the least lik<strong>el</strong>y tosmoke.Among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who smoke cigarettes, the largest proportion said they smoked 3-5sticks in the previous 24 hours (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by those who smoked 10 or more sticks in a day(29 perc<strong>en</strong>t).46 | Characteristics of Respond<strong>en</strong>ts


FERTILITY LEVELS, TRENDS, AND DIFFERENTIALS 4James N. Munguti and Robert Buluma4.1 INTRODUCTIONThis chapter analyses the fertility data collected in the 2008-09 KDHS. Lev<strong>el</strong>s, tr<strong>en</strong>ds, anddiffer<strong>en</strong>tials in fertility are described by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics; lifetime fertility(childr<strong>en</strong> ever born and living); and age at first birth and birth intervals. Thereafter, a brief discussionon te<strong>en</strong>age fertility, which has become critical to the changes in fertility in K<strong>en</strong>ya, is pres<strong>en</strong>ted.The 2008-09 KDHS was conducted against the backdrop of a stall in an ongoing fertilitydecline. Indeed, Bongaarts (2006), while examining fertility tr<strong>en</strong>ds in countries with multiple DHSsurveys, found that K<strong>en</strong>ya was one among sev<strong>en</strong> countries where fertility had stalled in mid-transitionin the 1990s. Fertility was high (more than six births per woman) in the 1950s in each of thesecountries but declined to fewer than five births per woman in the early or mid-1990s, before comingto a standstill. The fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s varied by country, ranging from 4.7 births per woman in K<strong>en</strong>ya to2.5 births per woman in Turkey. An analysis of tr<strong>en</strong>ds in the determinants of fertility in thesecountries revealed a systematic pattern of lev<strong>el</strong>ing or near lev<strong>el</strong>ing in a number of determinants,including contraceptive use, demand for contraception, and number of wanted births, but nosignificant increases in unwanted births or in the unmet need for contraception.4.2 CURRENT FERTILITYFindings on measures of curr<strong>en</strong>t fertility are pres<strong>en</strong>tedin Table 4.1. These include the total fertility rate (TFR),g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate (GFR), and crude birth rate (CBR). Thepoint estimates refer to the three-year period immediat<strong>el</strong>ypreceding the 2008-09 survey, or approximat<strong>el</strong>y 2006-08.Age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs) are calculated by dividingthe number of births to wom<strong>en</strong> in a specific age group by th<strong>en</strong>umber of woman-years lived during a giv<strong>en</strong> period. 1 Thetotal fertility rate (TFR) is defined as the average number ofchildr<strong>en</strong> a woman would have if she w<strong>en</strong>t through her <strong>en</strong>tirereproductive period, from 15 to 49 years, reproducing at theprevailing ASFRs. The g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate (GFR) repres<strong>en</strong>tsthe annual number of births per 1,000 wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-44, andthe crude birth rate (CBR) repres<strong>en</strong>ts the annual number ofbirths per 1,000 population. The CBR was estimated using thebirth history data in conjunction with the population datacollected in the household schedule.A TFR of 4.6 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman was reported forthe three years before the survey (see Table 4.1) comparedTable 4.1 Curr<strong>en</strong>t fertilityAge-specific and total fertility rate, the g<strong>en</strong>eralfertility rate, and the crude birth rate for thethree years preceding the survey, by resid<strong>en</strong>ce,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age groupResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban Ruralwith a TFR of 4.9 childr<strong>en</strong> reported for the period 2000-02 based on the 2003 KDHS. As expected,rural areas recorded higher fertility than urban areas (TFR of 5.2 and 2.9, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). This pattern isreflected by every age group, and the differ<strong>en</strong>ce increases with the age of the wom<strong>en</strong>, with the fertilityTotal15-19 92 107 10320-24 146 280 23825-29 147 248 21630-34 104 197 17535-39 60 135 11840-44 28 56 5045-49 7 13 12TFR 2.9 5.2 4.6GFR 112 179 161CBR 32.5 35.3 34.8Notes: Age-specific fertility rates are per1,000 wom<strong>en</strong>. Rates for age group 45-49 maybe slightly biased due to truncation. Rates arefor the period 1-36 months prior to interview.TFR: Total fertility rate expressed per womanGFR: G<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate expressed per1,000 wom<strong>en</strong>CBR: Crude birth rate, expressed per 1,000population1 Numerators for the age-specific fertility rates are calculated by summing all births that occurred during the 1 to36 months preceding the survey, classified by the age of the mother at the time of birth in 5-year age groups.The d<strong>en</strong>ominators are the number of woman-years lived in each specific 5-year age group during the 1 to 36months preceding the survey.Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials | 47


of the rural wom<strong>en</strong> age 20 and older being about twice that of the urban wom<strong>en</strong> of the same agecohort.Nationally and in rural areas, the peak fertility occurs early, at age 20-24, while in urbanareas, fertility has a broader peak, being almost equally high for the 20-24 and 25-29 age cohorts.Fertility rates, however, fall dramatically after age 39 in both rural and urban areas.The disparities in fertility among rural and urban wom<strong>en</strong> could be attributed to the significantrole played by education in population growth. Wh<strong>en</strong> literacy of wom<strong>en</strong> improves, fertility rates t<strong>en</strong>dto decrease. Similarly, fertility rates t<strong>en</strong>d to be lower where wom<strong>en</strong> have access to dec<strong>en</strong>t jobs, goodhealth care, and family planning resources—which are more available in urban areas than in ruralones.Table 4.2 and Figure 4.1 show the differ<strong>en</strong>tials in fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s by urban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce,province, educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t, and wealth quintile.Table 4.2 Fertility by background characteristicsTotal fertility rate for the three years preceding the survey, perc<strong>en</strong>tageof wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnant, and mean number ofchildr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 years, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicTotalfertility ratePerc<strong>en</strong>tageof wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49curr<strong>en</strong>tlypregnantMeannumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>ever bornto wom<strong>en</strong>age 40-49Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.9 6.7 3.6Rural 5.2 7.1 6.1ProvinceNairobi 2.8 5.5 3.4C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.4 5.0 4.4Coast 4.8 7.8 5.6Eastern 4.4 6.5 5.6Nyanza 5.4 8.1 6.1Rift Valley 4.7 6.7 5.9Western 5.6 8.9 6.6North Eastern (5.9) 11.0 6.7EducationNo education 6.7 9.9 6.9Primary incomplete 5.5 7.9 6.9Primary complete 4.9 7.7 5.4Secondary+ 3.1 5.0 4.1Wealth quintileLowest 7.0 9.9 7.1Second 5.6 7.3 6.8Middle 5.0 6.9 6.1Fourth 3.7 5.1 4.9Highest 2.9 6.5 3.4Total 4.6 7.0 5.6Note: Total fertility rates are for the period 1-36 months prior tointerview. Total fertility rates in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 500-750unweighted wom<strong>en</strong>.48 | Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials


Figure 4.1 Total Fertility Rates by Background CharacteristicsK<strong>en</strong>ya4.6Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrbanRural2.95.2ProvinceNairobiC<strong>en</strong>tralCoastEasternNyanzaRift ValleyWesternNorth Eastern2.83.44.84.44.75.45.65.9EducationNo educationPrimary incompletePrimary completeSecondary+3.14.95.56.70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Total fertility rateK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Fertility is lowest in Nairobi province (2.8 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman), followed by C<strong>en</strong>tral provinceat 3.4 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman, and highest in North Eastern province (5.9 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman). Fertilityin Western (5.6), Nyanza (5.4), Coast (4.8), and Rift Valley (4.7) provinces is slightly above th<strong>en</strong>ational average. These differ<strong>en</strong>tials in fertility are clos<strong>el</strong>y associated with disparities in educationallev<strong>el</strong>s and knowledge and use of family planning methods (see Chapter 5).Several studies have shown that education of wom<strong>en</strong> is negativ<strong>el</strong>y associated with fertility. Inthe 2008-09 KDHS, the TFR decreased from a high of 6.7 for wom<strong>en</strong> with no education to 3.1 forwom<strong>en</strong> with at least some secondary education. The data show that wom<strong>en</strong> who have completedprimary education have almost two fewer childr<strong>en</strong> per woman wh<strong>en</strong> compared with wom<strong>en</strong> who hav<strong>en</strong>o education. Fertility is also very clos<strong>el</strong>y associated with wealth. The disparity in fertility betwe<strong>en</strong>the poorest, who have the most childr<strong>en</strong>, and the richest wom<strong>en</strong>, who have the fewest, is four childr<strong>en</strong>per woman.Of all the wom<strong>en</strong> interviewed, 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t were pregnant at the time of the survey as indicatedin Table 4.2. This estimate lik<strong>el</strong>y is an underestimate, as wom<strong>en</strong> in the early stages of pregnancy maybe unaware or unsure that they are pregnant, and some may refuse to declare that they are pregnant.Noticeably, differ<strong>en</strong>tials in pregnancy rates are g<strong>en</strong>erally consist<strong>en</strong>t with the pattern of fertilitydepicted across the various subgroups. Wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province reported the highest lev<strong>el</strong>sof curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while those in C<strong>en</strong>tral province had the lowest at 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Thedata further show that the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who were pregnant at the time of the survey declinesuniformly as education of the wom<strong>en</strong> increases, from 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with no education to 5perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with at least some secondary schooling.Comparison of the mean number of lifetime births to older wom<strong>en</strong> with the curr<strong>en</strong>t TFR canprovide some insight into changes in fertility over the previous two decades or so. For example, thesurvey indicates that the mean number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 is 5.6, one childmore than the TFR, an indication of the decline in fertility during the late 1980s and 1990s. Onaverage, rural wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 have giv<strong>en</strong> birth to 6.1 childr<strong>en</strong>, compared with only 3.6 for theirurban counterparts. Provincial differ<strong>en</strong>tials indicate that wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 in Nairobi have the lowestmean number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born (3.4), compared with a high of 6.7 for North Eastern province.The largest absolute differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> completed fertility at ages 40-49 and the lev<strong>el</strong> of curr<strong>en</strong>tfertility occur in Rift Valley and Eastern provinces (1.2 childr<strong>en</strong>). The mean number of childr<strong>en</strong> everborn also r<strong>el</strong>ates to the lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth.Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials | 49


4.3 FERTILITY TRENDSSince 1989, K<strong>en</strong>ya has undertak<strong>en</strong> demographic and health surveys regularly, in addition toother surveys and c<strong>en</strong>suses, all of which have <strong>en</strong>dowed the country with a wealth of data forexamining fertility tr<strong>en</strong>ds. Accordingly, changes in fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s over time can be tracked byexamining fertility estimates from these surveys and c<strong>en</strong>suses. Such data have be<strong>en</strong> used to trackfertility tr<strong>en</strong>ds spanning the last three decades as summarised in Table 4.3 and Figure 4.2. The dataindicate that the TFR declined during the 1980s and 1990s, changing from a high of 8.1 childr<strong>en</strong> perwoman in the late 1970s to 6.7 in the late 1980s, and dropping to 4.7 during the last half of the 1990s.However, fertility seemed to rise, albeit marginally, after 1998, reaching a TFR of 4.9 childr<strong>en</strong> perwoman during the 2000-02 period. 2 The TFR th<strong>en</strong> seems to resume its decline, reaching a low of 4.6childr<strong>en</strong> per woman during the 2006-08 period as shown in Figure 4.2.Table 4.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in age-specific fertility ratesAge-specific fertility rates and total fertility rates from s<strong>el</strong>ected surveys and c<strong>en</strong>suses, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1975-2009Age group1977/78KFS 11975-781989KDHS 11984-881993KDHS 11990-921998KDHS 11995-971999C<strong>en</strong>sus2003KDHS2000-022008-09KDHS2006-0815-19 168 152 110 111 142 114 10320-24 342 314 257 248 254 243 23825-29 357 303 241 218 236 231 21630-34 293 255 197 188 185 196 17535-39 239 183 154 109 127 123 11840-44 145 99 70 51 56 55 5045-49 59 35 50 16 7 15 12TFR 8.1 6.7 5.4 4.7 5.0 4.9 4.6Note: Age-specific fertility rates are per 1,000 wom<strong>en</strong>. Rates refer to the three-year period preceding the surveysexcept for the 1989 KDHS, which used a five-year period and the 1999 c<strong>en</strong>sus, which used a period that varied withthe age groups used to make the adjustm<strong>en</strong>t.Sources: NCPD et al., 1999; C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics, 2002b.1Excludes the north part of the country.Figure 4.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Total Fertility Rate, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1975-2008*10Total Fertility Rate88.16.765.44.74.94.64201975-78 1984-88 1990-92 1995-97 2000-02 2006-08*The first four surveys excluded North Eastern province and several northern districts in Eastern and Rift Valley provinces, while the datafor 2000-02 and 2006-08 include the <strong>en</strong>tire country.2 Although the c<strong>en</strong>sus data and both the 2003 and the 2008-09 KDHSs are nationally repres<strong>en</strong>tative, data fromall previous surveys exclude the northern half of the country.50 | Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials


Several other fertility corr<strong>el</strong>ates studied in the 2008-09 KDHS are internally consist<strong>en</strong>t withthis new tr<strong>en</strong>d: contraceptive use has increased from 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> in 2003 to 46perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09; the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who want no more childr<strong>en</strong> has increased from 49perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09; and under-five mortality and infant mortality have declinedfrom 115 and 77 to 74 and 52 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2008-09, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.The data pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 4.4 on tr<strong>en</strong>ds in fertility by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristicsindicate that while the TFR dropped from 4.9 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman in the 2003 KDHS to 4.6 in the2008-09 KDHS, the decline was steeper for wom<strong>en</strong> in urban areas (12 perc<strong>en</strong>t decline) than for thosein rural areas (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Overall, the TFR declined from 3.3 to 2.9 in urban areas and from 5.4 to 5.2in rural areas. The same drop is observed across provinces, except in Nairobi where fertility increasedslightly and in C<strong>en</strong>tral province where it stagnated. Rift Valley province recorded the largest decreasein TFR (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t), dropping from 5.8 to 4.7 births per woman. The data also show that fertilityremained the same for wom<strong>en</strong> with no education but decreased for those with incomplete primaryeducation and for those who have at least some secondary education.Table 4.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in fertility by background characteristicsTotal fertility rates according to province, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, and education, K<strong>en</strong>ya1995-2009Backgroundcharacteristic1998 KDHS1995-982003 KDHS2000-032008-09 KDHS2006-08Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 3.1 3.3 2.9Rural 5.2 5.4 5.2ProvinceNairobi 2.6 2.7 2.8C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.7 3.4 3.4Coast 5.1 4.9 4.8Eastern 4.7 4.8 4.4Nyanza 5.0 5.6 5.4Rift Valley 5.3 5.8 4.7Western 5.6 5.8 5.6North Eastern u (7.0) (5.9)EducationNo education 5.8 6.7 6.7Primary incomplete 5.2 6.0 5.5Primary complete 4.8 4.8 4.9Secondary+ 3.5 3.2 3.1Total 4.7 4.9 4.6u = Unknown (not available)Note: Total fertility rates are for the period 1-36 months prior to interview.Data for the 1998 KDHS exclude North Eastern province and several othernorthern districts. Total fertility rates in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on fewerthan 750 unweighted wom<strong>en</strong>.Table 4.5 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the age specific fertility rate (ASFRs) for five-year periods preceding the2008-09 KDHS. For the first time, fertility seems to have declined in all age groups.Table 4.5 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in age-specific fertility ratesAge-specific fertility rates for five-year periods preceding the survey,by mother’s age at the time of the birth, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Mother’sage at birthNumber of years preceding survey0-4 5-9 10-14 15-1915-19 106 137 144 13820-24 239 253 255 26725-29 216 252 251 25830-34 182 193 209 [260]35-39 113 139 [190] -40-44 51 [96] - -45-49 [12] - - -Note: Age-specific fertility rates are per 1,000 wom<strong>en</strong>. Estimates inbrackets are truncated. Rates exclude the month of interview.Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials | 51


4.4 CHILDREN EVER BORN AND CHILDREN SURVIVINGThe distributions of all wom<strong>en</strong> and of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by the number ofchildr<strong>en</strong> ever born are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 4.6. Overall, 28 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 have nevergiv<strong>en</strong> birth. This proportion is far higher among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19, more than four-fifths of whom (86perc<strong>en</strong>t) have never giv<strong>en</strong> birth. This indicates that the vast majority of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 d<strong>el</strong>ayed theonset of childbearing, with only 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t having started the process. Similarly, one-third (34perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> age 20-24 and one in t<strong>en</strong> (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of those age 25-29 have never giv<strong>en</strong> birth.However, this proportion declines rapidly to around 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t for wom<strong>en</strong> age 30 years and above,indicating that childbearing among K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> is nearly universal. The data further show thatK<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> attain a parity of 6.3 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman at the <strong>en</strong>d of their childbearing period. Thisis 1.7 childr<strong>en</strong> above the total fertility rate (4.6 childr<strong>en</strong> per woman), a discrepancy that is attributableto the decline in fertility during the previous two decades.Table 4.6 Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born and livingPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of all wom<strong>en</strong> and curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> by number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born, mean number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born, and meannumber of living childr<strong>en</strong>, according to age group, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgeNumber of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+ALL WOMENTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Meannumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>ever bornMeannumber oflivingchildr<strong>en</strong>15-19 85.5 12.4 1.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,761 0.17 0.1620-24 33.5 28.7 22.5 10.3 3.6 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,715 1.27 1.1725-29 10.5 16.5 28.5 20.3 12.7 6.6 3.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,454 2.49 2.2930-34 3.4 8.9 16.4 21.6 17.4 13.4 10.3 6.2 1.3 0.9 0.2 100.0 1,209 3.69 3.4035-39 2.8 6.1 10.0 17.2 15.2 13.3 12.7 9.5 7.4 4.0 1.8 100.0 877 4.62 4.1740-44 2.6 4.7 10.7 14.1 17.3 12.1 11.0 7.2 8.4 6.0 6.0 100.0 768 5.00 4.4745-49 0.7 2.3 3.9 9.1 12.6 12.5 15.0 9.4 13.8 7.6 13.0 100.0 661 6.29 5.56Total 27.5 13.8 14.5 12.5 9.6 6.7 5.7 3.5 2.8 1.7 1.8 100.0 8,444 2.68 2.43CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN15-19 36.1 51.2 9.7 2.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 212 0.80 0.7520-24 9.9 32.4 33.1 16.5 5.8 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 958 1.83 1.6825-29 3.9 14.2 28.4 24.9 14.4 7.8 5.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 1,088 2.82 2.6230-34 1.5 6.2 14.3 22.3 19.6 15.1 11.3 7.1 1.6 0.6 0.3 100.0 962 3.95 3.6435-39 1.3 4.2 9.9 16.7 16.1 14.1 12.3 10.3 8.6 4.5 2.1 100.0 694 4.86 4.4440-44 1.7 2.2 9.2 14.2 18.4 11.7 12.0 8.4 8.3 6.8 7.1 100.0 548 5.30 4.7545-49 0.0 0.8 3.2 7.7 12.5 11.6 16.2 11.0 14.3 7.8 14.9 100.0 466 6.65 5.94Total 5.0 13.8 18.6 17.8 13.6 9.4 8.0 5.1 3.8 2.2 2.6 100.0 4,928 3.69 3.36A similar pattern is replicated for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, except that only slightly morethan one-third (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 have not borne a child. This proportiondiminishes rapidly, to 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t or less for married wom<strong>en</strong> age 25 and above. These differ<strong>en</strong>ces inchildbearing can be explained by the pres<strong>en</strong>ce of many young and unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> in the ‘allwom<strong>en</strong>’ category who are less exposed to the risk of conception than married wom<strong>en</strong> and exhibitlower fertility. On average, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49 have borne 6.7 childr<strong>en</strong> each.As expected, wom<strong>en</strong> above 40 years have much higher parities, with substantial proportionshaving 10 or more births each by the <strong>en</strong>d of their childbearing years. For example, more than onethird(34 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of all wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49 have giv<strong>en</strong> birth to eight or more childr<strong>en</strong>.The mean number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born and mean number of living childr<strong>en</strong> risemonotonically with the rising age of wom<strong>en</strong> as expected in a normal population. This indicatesminimal or no recall lapse, which height<strong>en</strong>s confid<strong>en</strong>ce in the birth history reports. A comparison ofthe mean number of living childr<strong>en</strong> with the mean number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born shows that, by the<strong>en</strong>d of their childbearing years, wom<strong>en</strong> have lost an average of 0.7 childr<strong>en</strong> (6.3 minus 5.6).52 | Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials


4.5 BIRTH INTERVALSThe l<strong>en</strong>gth of intervals betwe<strong>en</strong> births contributes greatly to the lev<strong>el</strong> of fertility and alsoaffects the health of both the mother and the child. Examining birth intervals provides insights intobirth patterns and maternal and child health. Studies have shown that childr<strong>en</strong> born fewer than 24months after a previous sibling are at greater risk of having poor health and that such births threat<strong>en</strong>maternal health. Table 4.7 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of non-first births in the five years before thesurvey by the number of months since the preceding birth, according to background characteristics.Table 4.7 Birth intervalsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of non-first births in the five years preceding the survey by number of months since preceding birth, andmedian number of months since preceding birth, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicMonths since preceding birth7-17 18-23 24-35 36-47 48-59 60+TotalNumberofnon-firstbirthsMediannumber ofmonths sinceprecedingbirthAge15-19 29.1 31.6 30.0 8.1 1.2 0.0 100.0 43 22.720-29 10.9 15.3 36.8 19.5 8.1 9.4 100.0 2,276 31.230-39 7.4 11.6 32.3 16.5 11.4 20.8 100.0 1,816 35.340-49 4.7 9.7 28.6 16.7 13.0 27.4 100.0 395 41.2Birth order2-3 8.5 13.9 31.8 18.3 9.6 17.9 100.0 2,213 34.34-6 9.6 13.1 36.4 17.4 9.2 14.3 100.0 1,664 32.37+ 9.8 13.3 37.1 18.0 11.8 10.0 100.0 654 32.1Sex of preceding birthMale 10.0 13.1 31.6 19.8 10.5 14.8 100.0 2,269 34.1Female 8.2 13.9 36.9 16.0 9.0 16.1 100.0 2,262 32.5Survival of preceding birthLiving 7.3 13.2 35.1 18.4 10.2 15.8 100.0 4,185 33.7Dead 31.3 16.6 24.4 11.7 4.9 11.1 100.0 345 24.5Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 8.5 11.4 25.4 17.8 11.0 25.9 100.0 695 38.0Rural 9.2 13.9 35.8 18.0 9.6 13.5 100.0 3,835 32.4ProvinceNairobi 8.8 11.1 22.6 16.0 12.1 29.3 100.0 199 40.4C<strong>en</strong>tral 6.1 8.7 23.1 17.0 13.4 31.6 100.0 337 43.1Coast 9.3 15.7 30.4 19.7 13.1 11.7 100.0 377 33.2Eastern 6.8 11.1 34.2 19.1 10.5 18.3 100.0 716 35.5Nyanza 11.6 15.5 35.5 16.4 10.3 10.7 100.0 862 30.7Rift Valley 7.2 12.7 38.2 19.9 7.5 14.5 100.0 1,322 32.5Western 11.9 16.9 35.3 15.0 9.6 11.4 100.0 563 29.9North Eastern 17.9 16.3 39.0 14.9 4.3 7.6 100.0 153 27.7EducationNo education 10.5 16.6 39.1 16.6 9.1 8.1 100.0 666 30.7Primary incomplete 10.1 14.1 33.9 20.2 9.7 12.1 100.0 1,609 32.6Primary complete 8.8 13.6 34.1 17.4 9.3 16.9 100.0 1,353 33.4Secondary+ 6.8 10.0 31.5 15.8 11.2 24.7 100.0 903 36.8Wealth quintileLowest 10.7 15.0 42.2 18.0 7.0 7.1 100.0 1,222 30.4Second 11.3 13.4 34.6 17.6 10.4 12.8 100.0 975 31.7Middle 7.1 13.8 33.0 19.4 11.0 15.5 100.0 866 34.3Fourth 8.3 12.3 30.0 16.1 10.9 22.3 100.0 762 35.7Highest 6.6 11.9 26.0 18.4 10.9 26.1 100.0 705 37.9Total 9.1 13.5 34.2 17.9 9.8 15.4 100.0 4,531 33.1Note: First-order births are excluded. The interval for multiple births is the number of months since the preceding pregnancy that<strong>en</strong>ded in a live birth.The median birth interval has remained more or less the same, changing marginally from 32.9months in the 1998 KDHS to 32.6 months in the 2003 KDHS and 33.1 months in the 2008-09 KDHS.However, the median birth interval is r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y shorter for childr<strong>en</strong> born to young wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-29;childr<strong>en</strong> whose preceding sibling died; childr<strong>en</strong> in rural areas; childr<strong>en</strong> born to wom<strong>en</strong> in NorthEastern, Western, Nyanza, and Rift Valley provinces; childr<strong>en</strong> born to wom<strong>en</strong> with no education; andFertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials | 53


those born to wom<strong>en</strong> from poorer households. The most common birth interval category is 24-35months, while the least common category is 7-17 months.The shortest median birth intervals are observed for childr<strong>en</strong> born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 (23months) and childr<strong>en</strong> whose preceding sibling died (25 months), while the longest intervals occuramong childr<strong>en</strong> born to wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province (43 months) and wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 (41 months).The data indicate that 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan childr<strong>en</strong> are born fewer than 24 months after aprevious birth. A short birth interval may pot<strong>en</strong>tially predict substantial risk to the health of both themother and the child. A larger proportion of such childr<strong>en</strong> are born to younger wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 (61perc<strong>en</strong>t) r<strong>el</strong>ative to other age groups, to wom<strong>en</strong> whose preceding birth died (48 perc<strong>en</strong>t), to wom<strong>en</strong> inNorth Eastern (34 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Western (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t) provinces compared with other provinces, and towom<strong>en</strong> with no education (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t) r<strong>el</strong>ative to those with some education.4.6 AGE AT FIRST BIRTHBecause the reproductive period is biologically limited (15-49 years), the onset ofchildbearing has a direct effect on fertility. Early initiation into childbearing l<strong>en</strong>gth<strong>en</strong>s thereproductive period and subsequ<strong>en</strong>tly increases fertility, which is lik<strong>el</strong>y to pose a risk forsocioeconomic disadvantages in later life—ev<strong>en</strong> for adolesc<strong>en</strong>t mothers from r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y comfortablebackgrounds. D<strong>el</strong>ayed initiation into childbearing has advantages, as it short<strong>en</strong>s the reproductiveduration, h<strong>en</strong>ce reducing fertility.Table 4.8 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who gave birth by exact ages, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage who have never giv<strong>en</strong> birth, and the median age at first birth, according to curr<strong>en</strong>t age. Theyoungest cohort of wom<strong>en</strong> for whom median age at first birth can be calculated is 25-29 years. Themedians for age groups 15-19 and 20-24 cannot be determined, as less than half of the wom<strong>en</strong> had abirth before reaching the lowest age of the age group.Table 4.8 Age at first birthPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who gave birth by exact ages, perc<strong>en</strong>tage who have nevergiv<strong>en</strong> birth, and median age at first birth, according to curr<strong>en</strong>t age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Curr<strong>en</strong>t agePerc<strong>en</strong>tage who gave birth by exact age15 18 20 22 25Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hav<strong>en</strong>evergiv<strong>en</strong> birthNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Medianage at firstbirth15-19 1.3 na na na na 85.5 1,761 a20-24 4.5 25.9 46.7 na na 33.5 1,715 a25-29 4.9 27.9 52.2 70.8 84.5 10.5 1,454 19.830-34 6.0 31.0 54.5 73.4 86.4 3.4 1,209 19.735-39 7.5 27.9 48.5 67.8 81.7 2.8 877 20.240-44 4.2 29.2 48.9 68.1 85.2 2.6 768 20.145-49 6.2 35.5 54.4 73.1 86.9 0.7 661 19.520-49 5.4 28.8 50.6 na na 12.2 6,683 19.925-49 5.7 29.9 51.9 70.8 84.9 4.9 4,969 19.8na = Not applicablea = Omitted because less than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> had a birth before reaching the beginningof the age groupA young median age at first birth usually has a positive effect on fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s because theexposure period is increased. The tr<strong>en</strong>ds in median age at first birth over a period of about 10 years asestimated in KDHS surveys show a marginal increase from 19.6 years for wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-29 in 1998to 20.1 years in 2003 and a decrease to 19.8 years in 2008-09. Caution should be exercised ininterpreting these slight changes, as they are lik<strong>el</strong>y to be statistically insignificant.Table 4.9 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the median age at first birth among wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-49 years by backgroundcharacteristics. As expected, wom<strong>en</strong> in urban areas have a higher median age at first birth than theirrural counterparts for all age groups. Higher median age at first birth is recorded in Nairobi province54 | Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials


for wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-49 (23 years), followed by C<strong>en</strong>tral and Coast provinces (both 20 years), while th<strong>el</strong>owest was observed in Nyanza province (19 years). This implies that wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province, onaverage, have their first birth nearly four years earlier than those in Nairobi.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s lev<strong>el</strong> of education is positiv<strong>el</strong>y r<strong>el</strong>ated to age at first birth; wom<strong>en</strong> with at leastsome secondary education begin childbearing more than three years after wom<strong>en</strong> with no education(22.1 and 18.7 years, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Similarly, wom<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealth quintile d<strong>el</strong>ay the onset ofchildbearing by about three years r<strong>el</strong>ative to wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest quintile.Table 4.9 Median age at first birthMedian age at first birth among wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-49 years, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAge25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Wom<strong>en</strong>age25-49Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 21.0 20.6 22.9 22.1 21.5 21.5Rural 19.3 19.5 19.5 19.6 19.1 19.4ProvinceNairobi 23.5 21.9 24.8 22.4 20.6 22.8C<strong>en</strong>tral 20.1 20.2 20.1 20.3 20.3 20.2Coast 19.1 20.6 20.1 21.3 20.2 20.1Eastern 19.5 20.4 19.7 20.4 19.7 19.9Nyanza 18.8 19.3 18.4 19.3 18.9 19.0Rift Valley 19.6 18.7 20.8 20.0 18.6 19.4Western 19.9 19.9 20.3 18.7 19.7 19.7North Eastern 19.3 18.5 20.2 (20.2) (20.3) 19.4EducationNo education 18.6 18.1 19.0 19.5 18.5 18.7Primary incomplete 18.2 18.2 18.7 18.0 18.4 18.3Primary complete 19.5 19.6 19.4 20.3 18.7 19.6Secondary+ 22.4 21.5 23.0 21.7 21.8 22.1Wealth quintileLowest 18.7 18.5 19.3 19.3 19.3 18.9Second 18.8 19.0 19.3 18.7 19.0 19.0Middle 19.5 20.0 18.8 18.9 18.7 19.3Fourth 19.7 19.7 20.5 21.2 19.5 20.0Highest 21.5 20.8 23.2 22.0 21.9 21.7Total 19.8 19.7 20.2 20.1 19.5 19.8Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on fewer than 25 unweighted wom<strong>en</strong>.4.7 TEENAGE FERTILITYSeveral studies have docum<strong>en</strong>ted the sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics ofadolesc<strong>en</strong>ts in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Among these are the 1977/78 K<strong>en</strong>ya Fertility Survey (KFS), the 1979, 1989,and 1999 Population C<strong>en</strong>sus reports, and the 1984 K<strong>en</strong>ya Contraceptive Preval<strong>en</strong>ce Survey (KCPS,1984). According to Kiragu et al. (1998), adolesc<strong>en</strong>t reproductive health has now become an ev<strong>en</strong>greater priority at a policy lev<strong>el</strong>, as attested to by the rec<strong>en</strong>t sessional papers on AIDS as w<strong>el</strong>l as th<strong>en</strong>ational Information, Education, Communication, and Advocacy Strategy.A better understanding of te<strong>en</strong>age fertility can result in improved sevices to this veryvulnerable special group. In an attempt to address the reproductive health needs and to reduce fertilityof this special group, the governm<strong>en</strong>t, through the National Coordinating Ag<strong>en</strong>cy for Population andDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t, put in place an Adolesc<strong>en</strong>t Reproductive Health Policy.There are various critical reasons why it is important to understand more about te<strong>en</strong>agefertility. Childr<strong>en</strong> born to very young mothers are normally predisposed to higher risks of illness anddeath due to the limited exposure of the mothers to reproductive health services. Adolesc<strong>en</strong>t mothersare also more lik<strong>el</strong>y to experi<strong>en</strong>ce complications during pregnancy and are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be preparedto deal with them, which oft<strong>en</strong> leads to maternal deaths. Because of their early <strong>en</strong>try into childFertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials | 55


earing, the mothers are d<strong>en</strong>ied the opportunity to pursue basic and advanced academic goals. Thisev<strong>en</strong>tually affects their w<strong>el</strong>fare and social status and h<strong>en</strong>ce limits access to many reproductive healthprogrammes.Evid<strong>en</strong>ce of the ext<strong>en</strong>t of te<strong>en</strong>age fertility is giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 4.10, which pres<strong>en</strong>ts theperc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 who have had a live birth or who are pregnant with their first childand the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who have begun childbearing by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics.G<strong>en</strong>erally, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of te<strong>en</strong>agers who have begun childbearing declined from 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the2003 KDHS to 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09 KDHS. The proportion of te<strong>en</strong>age mothers declined from 19perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09, while the proportion of those pregnant with their first childdeclined as w<strong>el</strong>l, from 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. These changes are lik<strong>el</strong>y to cause asignificant reduction in the number of births in coming years.The proportion of te<strong>en</strong>agers who have begun childbearing increases dramatically from 2perc<strong>en</strong>t at age 15 to 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t at age 19 as shown in Table 4.10. As was also observed in the 2003KDHS, there is not much of a differ<strong>en</strong>tial in te<strong>en</strong>age fertility betwe<strong>en</strong> urban and rural wom<strong>en</strong>. Th<strong>el</strong>ev<strong>el</strong>s of te<strong>en</strong>age childbearing are highest in Nyanza (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Coast (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t) provincesand lowest in C<strong>en</strong>tral province (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t). This conforms to other social indicators of dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>tsuch as education that influ<strong>en</strong>ce a d<strong>el</strong>ay in onset of childbearing. One-third of uneducated te<strong>en</strong>agers(32 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have begun childbearing, compared with only one-t<strong>en</strong>th of those with some secondaryeducation and above. Similarly, te<strong>en</strong>agers from poorer households are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have begunchildbearing (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than are te<strong>en</strong>agers from wealthier households (16 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 4.10 Te<strong>en</strong>age pregnancy and motherhoodPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 who have had a live birth or who are pregnantwith their first child and perc<strong>en</strong>tage who have begun childbearing, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who:Have had alive birthAre pregnantwithfirst childPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho havebegun childbearingNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15 1.0 1.1 2.1 31716 8.2 1.3 9.4 43717 13.0 3.4 16.5 33218 21.6 4.6 26.2 35319 30.0 6.2 36.2 321Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 16.1 2.3 18.5 329Rural 14.1 3.4 17.5 1,432ProvinceNairobi 13.6 0.3 13.9 105C<strong>en</strong>tral 7.7 2.5 10.1 160Coast 23.9 1.8 25.7 140Eastern 10.9 2.6 13.5 298Nyanza 23.1 3.9 27.0 318Rift Valley 12.7 3.8 16.5 460Western 11.1 4.0 15.1 237North Eastern 10.3 5.9 16.2 43EducationNo education 26.4 5.7 32.1 71Primary incomplete 15.9 3.2 19.1 725Primary complete 17.3 5.9 23.3 403Secondary+ 9.0 0.9 10.0 561Wealth quintileLowest 18.9 4.8 23.7 322Second 14.4 3.5 17.9 363Middle 9.9 3.7 13.6 387Fourth 16.5 1.1 17.6 369Highest 13.2 3.2 16.4 319Total 14.5 3.2 17.7 1,76156 | Fertility Lev<strong>el</strong>s, Tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and Differ<strong>en</strong>tials


FAMILY PLANNING 5Samu<strong>el</strong> Ogola and Micha<strong>el</strong> MusyokaTo attain a balance betwe<strong>en</strong> resources and population, K<strong>en</strong>yan population policy promotesfamily planning as an <strong>en</strong>titlem<strong>en</strong>t that is based on informed and voluntary choice. Couples aremotivated to adopt a family planning method wh<strong>en</strong> they are offered improved access to and quality ofreproductive health services. Adequate information about methods of contraception <strong>en</strong>ables couples todev<strong>el</strong>op a rational approach to planning their families. Therefore, a primary objective of this surveywas to assess knowledge and use of contraceptive methods. This chapter describes wom<strong>en</strong>’sknowledge, ever use, and curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraceptive methods, sources and costs of modern methods,accessibility to family planning services, int<strong>en</strong>t of contraceptive use, and informed choice. In addition,exposure to family planning messages and lev<strong>el</strong> of contact with family planning providers areassessed. Where appropriate, comparisons are also made with findings from previous similar surveysconducted in K<strong>en</strong>ya.5.1 KNOWLEDGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODSDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t of a profile regarding knowledge of family planning methods was one of themajor objectives of the survey, because knowledge of methods is a prerequisite for making a decisionto initiate contraceptive use. Information on knowledge of contraception was collected during thesurvey by asking wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> to name ways or methods by which a couple could d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoidpregnancy. If the respond<strong>en</strong>t failed to m<strong>en</strong>tion a particular method spontaneously, the interviewerdescribed the method and asked if the respond<strong>en</strong>t recognized it. In this manner, information wascollected about t<strong>en</strong> modern methods (female sterilisation, male sterilisation, the pill, intra-uterinedevice (IUD), injectables, implants, male condoms, female condoms, lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, andemerg<strong>en</strong>cy contraception) and two traditional methods (rhythm or cal<strong>en</strong>dar method and withdrawal).Provision was also made within the questionnaire to record any other methods named spontaneouslyby the respond<strong>en</strong>t. Most emphasis is placed on wom<strong>en</strong> because they have the greatest lev<strong>el</strong> ofexposure to the risk of pregnancy and most methods of contraception are designed for them.Table 5.1 shows the lev<strong>el</strong> of knowledge of contraceptive methods among all wom<strong>en</strong> and allm<strong>en</strong> age 15-49. Also included are those who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married, and those who are unmarried butsexually active. Though knowledge of family planning methods is universal, m<strong>en</strong> are only slightlymore lik<strong>el</strong>y to have heard of a specific method than wom<strong>en</strong>; 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofm<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 know at least one method of family planning. Neverth<strong>el</strong>ess, wom<strong>en</strong> have heard ofmore methods than m<strong>en</strong>, on average (7.5 vs. 6.6).Modern methods are more familiar to wom<strong>en</strong> than traditional methods; 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>know at least one modern method, and only 69 perc<strong>en</strong>t know a traditional method. Among wom<strong>en</strong>,the most wid<strong>el</strong>y known modern methods of contraception are male condoms, injectables, and pills,with about 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> saying they know of these methods. The least known methodsamong wom<strong>en</strong> are the lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method (LAM), male sterilisation, and emerg<strong>en</strong>cycontraception, which are known by 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t or less of all wom<strong>en</strong>. Around 6 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> haveheard of female sterilisation, the IUD, implants, and the female condom. With regard to traditionalmethods, about two-thirds of wom<strong>en</strong> have heard of the rhythm method, and just under half knowabout withdrawal, while folk methods are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be m<strong>en</strong>tioned.Family Planning | 57


Table 5.1 Knowledge of contraceptive methodsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of all respond<strong>en</strong>ts, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married respond<strong>en</strong>ts, and sexually active unmarried respond<strong>en</strong>ts age 15-49 who know any contraceptive method, by specific method, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09MethodAllwom<strong>en</strong>Wom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarriedwom<strong>en</strong>Sexuallyactiveunmarriedwom<strong>en</strong> 1Allm<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarriedm<strong>en</strong>Sexuallyactiveunmarriedm<strong>en</strong> 1Any method 94.6 96.4 97.6 97.0 98.4 98.8Any modern method 94.5 96.2 97.6 96.9 98.1 98.8Female sterilisation 66.8 73.9 63.6 58.1 67.5 53.3Male sterilisation 38.1 41.6 40.0 48.2 58.6 43.5Pill 87.9 92.8 86.6 80.6 88.3 81.1IUD 61.1 70.1 62.5 40.2 51.8 32.8Injectables 88.5 93.9 89.6 74.0 86.0 68.1Implants 67.2 76.9 67.7 37.6 50.5 33.9Male condom 89.2 90.1 95.8 96.1 97.5 98.3Female condom 57.6 60.4 57.4 61.6 68.8 60.2Lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea (LAM) 33.9 41.6 26.9 13.7 19.5 12.1Emerg<strong>en</strong>cy contraception 40.2 42.1 49.7 35.7 41.1 38.4Any traditional method 68.5 74.3 69.2 69.5 79.5 62.9Rhythm 61.5 67.1 60.4 63.4 74.3 56.7Withdrawal 47.6 53.4 54.6 51.4 62.1 46.4Folk method 6.8 8.3 5.3 3.0 3.8 2.0Mean number of methods known byrespond<strong>en</strong>ts age 15-49 7.5 8.1 7.6 6.6 7.7 6.3Number of respond<strong>en</strong>ts 8,444 4,928 318 3,258 1,592 294Mean number of methods known byrespond<strong>en</strong>ts age 15-54 na na na 6.7 7.6 6.3Number of respond<strong>en</strong>ts na na na 3,465 1,780 296na = Not applicable1Had last sexual intercourse within 30 days preceding the surveyCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married and sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> have higher lev<strong>el</strong>s of knowledge ofcontraceptives than all wom<strong>en</strong>. Overall, the mean number of methods known is higher for curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> (8.1) and for sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> (7.6) than for all wom<strong>en</strong> (7.5). M<strong>en</strong>are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> to know about male and female condoms, male sterilisation, the rhythmmethod, and withdrawal, while wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to know about the pill, the IUD, injectables,implants, and LAM.Data by background characteristics show that awar<strong>en</strong>ess of family planning methods iswidespread (data not shown). The proportion of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who have heard ofat least one contraceptive method exceeds 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t in all categories by age, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, education,and wealth. Exceptions are found among wom<strong>en</strong> with no education, wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealthquintile, and wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province, where less than half of married wom<strong>en</strong> have heard ofany method (data not shown).Table 5.2 pres<strong>en</strong>ts a comparative picture of tr<strong>en</strong>ds in contraceptive knowledge among allwom<strong>en</strong> over time. It shows that, while the increase in knowledge of any one method has be<strong>en</strong> steadybut modest over the past 20-25 years, awar<strong>en</strong>ess of many specific methods has increasedconsiderably. For example, the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who know about condoms increased from 42perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1984 to 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Similarly, awar<strong>en</strong>ess of male sterilisation, the pill, andinjectables has increased sizeably.58 | Family Planning


Table 5.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in contraceptive knowledgePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 who know specific contraceptive methods, K<strong>en</strong>ya, 1984-2008-09Method1984KCPS1989KDHS1993KHDS1998KDHS2003KDHS2008-09KDHSAny method 81.0 90.0 95.6 96.8 94.6 94.6Any modern method 79.7 88.4 95.2 96.3 94.4 94.5Female sterilisation 55.0 68.2 81.1 81.8 73.9 66.8Male sterilisation 18.1 19.8 41.3 47.7 47.2 38.1Pill 72.7 84.4 91.9 92.6 89.5 87.9IUD 55.2 62.0 73.3 72.0 67.0 61.1Injectables 58.9 76.3 87.6 89.7 88.9 88.5Implants U U U 48.7 63.7 67.2Male condom 41.5 a 53.4 a 83.4 a 91.5 a 90.6 89.2Any traditional method U 54.8 71.9 72.6 70.0 68.5Rhythm 51.0 50.7 64.2 68.8 64.7 61.5Withdrawal 24.0 16.8 29.5 36.9 41.3 47.6Other/folk methods U 5.1 9.3 8.1 9.3 6.8Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 6,581 7,150 7,540 7,881 8,195 8,444U = No informationaThe question did not specify male condom.Note: Data from the first four sources omit the North Eastern province and several othernorthern districts.Sources: CBS, 1984; NCPD and IRD, 1989; NCPD,CBS, and MI 1994; NCPD,CBS, and MI,1999; CBS, MOH, and ORC Macro, 2004.5.2 EVER USE OF FAMILY PLANNING METHODSAll wom<strong>en</strong> who said that they had heard of a method of family planning were asked whetherthey had ever used that method to d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoid getting pregnant. Table 5.3 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage ofall wom<strong>en</strong>, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, and sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever usedspecific methods of family planning. Ever use of contraception is higher among sexually activeunmarried wom<strong>en</strong> (76 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than either all wom<strong>en</strong> (58 perc<strong>en</strong>t) or curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> (73perc<strong>en</strong>t). The most commonly ever used methods among all wom<strong>en</strong> and curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> areinjectables and pills, whereas sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to have ever used thecondom.Ever use of family planning has increased since 2003. Overall, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever used any method of contraception has increased from 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2003 to 73 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Similarly, the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever used a modernmethod has increased from 55 to 68 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Family Planning | 59


Table 5.3 Ever use of contraceptionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong>, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, and sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever used any contraceptive method by method, according to age,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Modern methodTraditional methodAgeAnymethodAnymodernmethodFemalesterilisationInject-MalePill IUD ables ImplantscondomALL WOMENEmerg<strong>en</strong>cyception RhythmWithdrawalcondom LAMFemalecontraceptionAnytraditionalmethod 15-19 14.1 13.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.5 0.0 9.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.9 2.4 0.9 0.2 1,76120-24 57.3 52.2 0.0 14.1 0.8 30.0 1.0 23.8 0.4 1.4 3.0 17.7 13.9 5.7 0.9 1,71525-29 72.6 68.5 0.6 29.7 3.9 51.2 4.1 17.5 0.5 3.3 3.3 20.5 16.7 7.1 0.9 1,45430-34 78.4 73.7 4.0 40.0 3.8 54.1 4.6 16.6 0.5 5.1 1.3 22.9 17.8 9.8 1.1 1,20935-39 72.8 67.4 5.6 36.4 7.1 49.8 3.9 14.5 2.7 3.7 1.0 23.4 18.8 8.8 3.8 87740-44 75.1 71.1 11.1 43.7 9.4 45.8 4.7 8.9 0.3 5.4 0.6 17.5 12.4 4.5 3.5 76845-49 64.2 56.5 11.6 27.7 12.7 29.8 2.7 9.1 0.1 3.4 0.8 16.8 14.1 3.0 1.9 661Total 57.7 53.6 3.2 23.9 4.0 35.1 2.6 15.2 0.6 2.8 1.7 16.4 12.9 5.5 1.4 8,444CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN15-19 38.6 35.2 0.0 6.6 0.2 19.9 0.0 13.3 0.4 1.4 0.4 9.0 6.6 3.5 0.9 21220-24 68.0 62.3 0.1 19.7 1.3 44.9 0.9 19.8 0.5 2.3 1.1 20.0 14.5 6.9 1.0 95825-29 75.3 71.7 0.5 33.2 4.5 55.5 4.8 14.6 0.5 3.4 3.2 19.2 15.3 7.4 1.0 1,08830-34 79.8 74.5 4.8 39.6 4.3 56.4 5.2 15.7 0.4 5.9 0.9 23.9 18.5 10.4 1.2 96235-39 74.8 68.6 6.3 37.4 7.8 48.7 4.2 13.3 2.9 3.6 1.0 26.1 20.9 9.9 4.8 69440-44 79.1 75.8 13.7 48.7 11.4 48.7 5.8 7.1 0.1 6.4 0.4 19.0 13.0 4.2 4.4 54845-49 69.1 60.0 14.0 28.5 12.7 33.4 3.5 7.7 0.1 3.3 0.4 17.6 14.7 3.2 2.0 466Total 72.9 67.8 4.8 32.6 5.7 48.3 3.8 14.1 0.7 3.9 1.3 20.6 15.9 7.3 2.1 4,928SEXUALLY ACTIVE UNMARRIED WOMEN 1FolkmethodNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>15-19 46.7 44.4 0.0 3.7 0.0 3.1 0.0 37.8 0.0 0.0 5.8 13.8 10.3 4.3 0.6 7220-24 83.6 81.6 0.0 17.3 1.3 23.7 3.5 64.2 1.9 0.3 21.3 21.1 19.2 6.6 0.0 6625+ 84.3 80.0 3.3 41.2 8.1 55.3 2.7 35.9 1.6 0.6 9.2 22.4 16.6 7.9 1.1 180Total 75.7 72.3 1.8 27.8 4.9 37.0 2.2 42.2 1.3 0.4 10.9 20.2 15.8 6.8 0.7 318LAM = Lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method1Wom<strong>en</strong> who had sexual intercourse within 30 days preceding the survey60 | Family Planning60 | Family Planning


5.3 CURRENT USE OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODSThe contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate (CPR) is the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age15-49 who are using any method of family planning. Table 5.4 shows that slightly less than half ofcurr<strong>en</strong>tly married K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are curr<strong>en</strong>tly using some method of contraception.Modern methods of contraception are more commonly used (39 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than traditional methods(6 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Of the modern methods, injectables are the most wid<strong>el</strong>y used, while the rhythm method isthe most popular traditional method. Curr<strong>en</strong>t use is higher among sexually active wom<strong>en</strong> and lowestamong all wom<strong>en</strong>, a group that includes wom<strong>en</strong> who have not married, are not sexually active, orboth.Contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>ce peaks among married wom<strong>en</strong> in the 30-34 age-group and is lowestfor wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19. As expected, female sterilisation is used more commonly by wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49,while married wom<strong>en</strong> at the peak of childbearing age (20-39) are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to use injectables andpills. Use of male condoms is particularly high among sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong>.As shown in Figure 5.1, there has be<strong>en</strong> a substantial increase in contraceptive use since th<strong>el</strong>ate 1970s, from 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> in 1978 to 46 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The contraceptivepreval<strong>en</strong>ce rate remained the same betwe<strong>en</strong> 1998 and 2003, but increased again betwe<strong>en</strong> 2003 and2008-09 at the same mom<strong>en</strong>tum as betwe<strong>en</strong> 1993 and 1998. The increase in the overall contraceptivepreval<strong>en</strong>ce rate is fu<strong>el</strong>led by increased use of modern methods. Betwe<strong>en</strong> 2003 and 2008-09, use ofmodern methods increased from 32 to 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>, while use of traditional methodsover the same time period actually decreased from 8 to 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>.50Figure 5.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Contraceptive Use, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1978-2008(perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> using any method)Perc<strong>en</strong>t464039 39333027201710701978 1984 1989 1993 1998 2003 2008-09Note: Data from the first five sources omit several northern districts, while the 2003 and 2008-09 KDHS surveys repres<strong>en</strong>t the <strong>en</strong>tire country.Family Planning | 61


As shown in Figure 5.2, changes in use of specific methods over the past decade have tak<strong>en</strong>mixed directions. Use of pills, the IUD, and the rhythm method appears to be declining, while therehas be<strong>en</strong> a notable increase in use of injectables, especially since 2003.Figure 5.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Specific Contraceptive Methodsamong Curr<strong>en</strong>tly Married Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1998-20082520Perc<strong>en</strong>t221512141050987322Pill IUD Injectables Condoms Femalesterilisation1998 2003 2008-091126 6 65 54RhythmmethodNote: The 1998 KDHS omitted several northern districts.K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0962 | Family Planning


Table 5.4 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by agePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of all wom<strong>en</strong>, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, all sexually active wom<strong>en</strong>, and sexually active unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by contraceptive method curr<strong>en</strong>tly used, accordingto age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Modern method With-sation Pill IUD condom LAM Rhythm Male Any Traditional methodAny FemaletraditionalNotNumberAny modern sterilisationInject-FemaleFolk curr<strong>en</strong>tlyofAge method methodables Implants condom method drawal method using Total wom<strong>en</strong>ALL WOMEN15-19 5.9 4.9 0.0 0.6 0.0 2.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.1 94.1 100.0 1,76120-24 27.4 23.6 0.0 4.0 0.1 13.9 0.5 4.7 0.0 0.3 3.9 2.7 0.5 0.6 72.6 100.0 1,71525-29 40.2 36.7 0.6 7.0 0.9 22.3 2.7 2.3 0.0 0.9 3.6 2.5 0.6 0.5 59.8 100.0 1,45430-34 50.0 45.0 4.0 7.6 1.2 26.8 2.6 2.2 0.1 0.6 5.0 4.1 0.7 0.1 50.0 100.0 1,20935-39 44.9 36.6 5.6 5.8 2.9 18.2 1.6 2.3 0.0 0.2 8.3 7.0 0.2 1.1 55.1 100.0 87740-44 43.2 38.4 11.1 6.5 2.4 15.3 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.5 4.8 4.0 0.3 0.5 56.8 100.0 76845-49 32.6 26.7 11.6 3.8 1.8 6.4 0.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 5.9 5.2 0.3 0.4 67.4 100.0 661Total 32.0 28.0 3.2 4.7 1.0 14.8 1.3 2.6 0.0 0.4 4.1 3.2 0.4 0.4 68.0 100.0 8,444CURRENTLY MARRIED WOMEN15-19 22.5 19.6 0.0 3.2 0.0 14.4 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.2 2.9 1.3 1.2 0.5 77.5 100.0 21220-24 35.7 30.4 0.1 5.8 0.2 21.1 0.6 2.1 0.0 0.5 5.2 3.3 0.9 1.0 64.3 100.0 95825-29 45.3 41.3 0.5 8.1 0.9 26.5 3.1 1.7 0.0 0.5 4.0 2.9 0.5 0.6 54.7 100.0 1,08830-34 54.9 48.8 4.8 8.5 1.4 28.9 2.9 1.6 0.0 0.8 6.0 4.9 0.9 0.2 45.1 100.0 96235-39 51.2 41.2 6.3 7.3 3.7 19.4 1.9 2.4 0.0 0.3 10.0 8.3 0.3 1.4 48.8 100.0 69440-44 52.5 46.6 13.7 9.1 3.3 16.7 1.9 1.3 0.0 0.7 5.9 5.0 0.4 0.5 47.5 100.0 54845-49 40.4 32.4 14.0 5.1 1.8 8.6 1.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 8.0 7.0 0.5 0.6 59.6 100.0 466Total 45.5 39.4 4.8 7.2 1.6 21.6 1.9 1.8 0.0 0.5 6.0 4.7 0.7 0.7 54.5 100.0 4,928ALL SEXUALLY ACTIVE WOMEN 115-19 27.7 24.7 0.0 3.4 0.0 13.5 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.220-24 43.6 37.2 0.1 7.1 0.2 23.7 0.7 5.0 0.0 0.325-29 51.3 47.3 0.6 10.0 1.0 29.2 3.5 2.7 0.0 0.330-34 60.4 54.2 5.1 9.4 1.5 31.6 3.2 2.6 0.1 0.735-39 55.3 44.8 5.9 7.7 4.2 22.1 1.8 3.0 0.0 0.140-44 59.2 51.6 14.4 9.2 3.7 20.4 1.9 1.7 0.0 0.445-49 44.3 36.1 15.1 6.6 2.4 8.0 1.1 2.9 0.0 0.1Total 51.1 44.6 4.8 8.3 1.7 24.0 2.1 3.4 0.0 0.3SEXUALLY ACTIVE UNMARRIED WOMEN 13.0 2.1 6.4 4.0 6.1 10.5 7.5 8.2 6.5 0.3 0.6 72.3 100.0 2334.2 0.9 1.3 56.4 100.0 7912.5 0.8 0.7 48.7 100.0 9395.0 1.0 0.2 39.6 100.0 8149.0 0.4 1.1 44.7 100.0 5656.5 0.5 0.5 40.8 100.0 4426.9 0.6 0.7 55.7 100.0 3515.0 0.7 0.8 48.9 100.0 4,13515-19 26.8 23.2 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 3.0 0.0 0.6 73.2 100.0 7220-24 63.2 58.9 0.0 11.1 0.0 16.0 0.6 31.2 0.0 0.0 4.4 3.3 0.0 1.1 36.8 100.0 6625+ 54.8 48.7 3.3 5.3 2.3 23.1 1.8 12.5 0.4 0.0 6.1 5.0 1.0 0.1 45.2 100.0 180Total 50.3 45.1 1.8 5.8 1.3 16.8 1.2 18.0 0.2 0.0 5.2 4.2 0.6 0.4 49.7 100.0 318Note: If more than one method is used, only the most effective method is considered in this tabulation.LAM = Lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method1Wom<strong>en</strong> who have had sexual intercourse within 30 days preceding the surveyFamily Planning | 63Family Planning | 63


5.4 DIFFERENTIALS IN CONTRACEPTIVE USE BY BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICSAs shown in Figure 5.3 and Table 5.5, some wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use contraceptivesthan others. Married wom<strong>en</strong> in urban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use a contraceptive (53 perc<strong>en</strong>t) thantheir rural counterparts (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Though use of modern methods is g<strong>en</strong>erally higher in urban(47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than in rural areas (37 perc<strong>en</strong>t), female sterilisation is more common among rural wom<strong>en</strong>than among urban wom<strong>en</strong>.Figure 5.3 Curr<strong>en</strong>t Use of Any Contraceptive Method amongCurr<strong>en</strong>tly Married Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49, by Background CharacteristicsResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrbanRuralProvinceNairobiC<strong>en</strong>tralCoastEasternNyanzaRift ValleyWesternNorth EasternEducationNo educationPrimary incompletePrimary completeSecondary+Wealth quintileLowestSecondMiddleFourthHighest4142034433742474040485053525557550 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 806067Perc<strong>en</strong>tK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Married wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province continue to have the highest contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>cerate (67 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by Nairobi (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Eastern province (52 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The lowestlev<strong>el</strong> of family planning use is recorded in the North Eastern province at 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Contraceptive use increases dramatically with increasing lev<strong>el</strong> of education. Sixty perc<strong>en</strong>t ofmarried wom<strong>en</strong> with at least some secondary education use a contraceptive method compared with40 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with incomplete primary education and only 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those who neveratt<strong>en</strong>ded school.The proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> using modern methods increases with the number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>, peaking at three to four childr<strong>en</strong> and th<strong>en</strong> dropping for those with five or more childr<strong>en</strong>. Useof any contraceptive methods rises from 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t among married wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealthquintile to 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t among those in the fourth wealth quintile, and th<strong>en</strong> drops off slightly for thosein the highest wealth quintile.64 | Family Planning


Table 5.5 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by contraceptive method curr<strong>en</strong>tly used, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAnymethodAnymodernmethodModern method Inject-MaleAnyFemalesterilisationtraditionalPill IUD ables Implants condom LAM methodRhythmTraditional methodWithdrawalFolkmethodNotNumbercurr<strong>en</strong>tlyofusing Total wom<strong>en</strong>Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 53.1 46.6 3.0 11.1 2.9 23.5 2.7 2.7 0.8 6.5 5.6 0.5 0.3 46.9 100.0 1,154Rural 43.1 37.2 5.3 6.1 1.2 21.0 1.7 1.5 0.4 5.9 4.4 0.7 0.8 56.9 100.0 3,774ProvinceNairobi 55.3 49.0 2.7 13.8 3.9 18.2 4.4 4.4 1.7 6.3 5.6 0.4 0.3 44.7 100.0 363C<strong>en</strong>tral 66.7 62.5 8.1 19.4 5.1 25.7 3.2 0.7 0.3 4.2 2.4 1.2 0.6 33.3 100.0 535Coast 34.3 29.7 2.1 5.4 0.7 17.8 1.4 1.5 0.8 4.6 4.0 0.6 0.0 65.7 100.0 427Eastern 52.0 43.8 3.9 9.1 1.4 26.5 1.6 0.6 0.6 8.3 7.1 0.9 0.3 48.0 100.0 844Nyanza 37.3 32.9 5.7 3.1 0.4 18.0 1.8 3.6 0.3 4.4 2.6 0.4 1.4 62.7 100.0 832Rift Valley 42.4 34.7 4.1 3.7 0.9 23.0 1.7 1.0 0.2 7.7 6.1 0.9 0.7 57.6 100.0 1,279Western 46.5 41.1 7.9 5.9 0.8 22.2 1.2 2.8 0.3 5.4 4.0 0.1 1.3 53.5 100.0 518North Eastern 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.1 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.5 100.0 130EducationNo education 14.1 12.0 2.6 0.7 0.0 7.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 2.1 1.5 0.2 0.3 85.9 100.0 565Primary incomplete 40.3Primary complete 48.2Secondary+ 59.834.8 5.4 41.8 52.1 4.1 0.8 21.4 1.1 1.7 0.5 5.4 3.6 0.8 1.0 59.7 100.0 1,4404.8 7.3 1.0 25.8 1.3 1.3 0.3 6.4 5.1 0.4 0.9 51.8 100.0 1,4365.0 12.8 3.4 23.3 4.0 2.9 0.7 7.7 6.5 0.9 0.4 40.2 100.0 1,488Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 14.7 10.5 0.0 3.4 0.0 3.7 0.9 2.5 0.0 4.2 2.2 1.0 1.0 85.3 100.0 2961-2 47.0 42.1 0.9 9.9 1.8 24.4 2.2 2.6 0.4 4.9 3.7 0.6 0.6 53.0 100.0 1,7633-4 53.2 46.4 5.5 7.6 2.1 26.3 2.7 1.6 0.6 6.8 5.4 0.7 0.7 46.8 100.0 1,5635+ 41.2 34.2 10.3 4.1 0.8 16.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 7.0 5.7 0.5 0.8 58.8 100.0 1,307Wealth quintileLowest 20.1 16.9 2.3 1.3 0.0 11.9 0.2 0.9 0.3 3.2 1.7 1.0 0.5 79.9 100.0 870Second 40.0 33.4 3.8 3.7 0.5 22.2 0.7 1.8 0.7 6.6 4.4 0.5 1.7 60.0 100.0 883Middle 49.8 43.2 6.8 8.2 1.6 23.3 1.2 1.5 0.6 6.6 5.5 0.4 0.7 50.2 100.0 952Fourth 56.9 50.4 7.6 11.3 1.5 25.7 2.7 1.6 0.2 6.5 5.1 0.9 0.5 43.1 100.0 1,012Highest 54.7 47.9 3.4 10.0 3.4 23.4 4.0 2.9 0.6 6.8 6.0 0.5 0.2 45.3 100.0 1,211Total 45.5 39.4 4.8 7.2 1.6 21.6 1.9 1.8 0.5 6.0 4.7 0.7 0.7 54.5 100.0 4,928Note: If more than one method is used, only the most effective method is considered in this tabulation.LAM = Lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea methodFamily Planning | 65Family Planning | 65


5.5 NUMBER OF CHILDREN AT FIRST USE OF CONTRACEPTIONTable 5.6 shows the distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> by age and number of living childr<strong>en</strong> at first use ofcontraception. The results imply that K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> are adopting family planning at lower parities(i.e., wh<strong>en</strong> they have fewer childr<strong>en</strong>) than in the past. Among younger wom<strong>en</strong> (age 20-24), 22 perc<strong>en</strong>tused contraception before having any childr<strong>en</strong> and 25 perc<strong>en</strong>t started using contraception wh<strong>en</strong> theyhad one child. Among older wom<strong>en</strong> (age 45-49), only 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t used contraception before having anychildr<strong>en</strong>, and 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t used contraception by parity 1.Table 5.6 Number of childr<strong>en</strong> at first use of contraceptionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by number of living childr<strong>en</strong> at the time of first use ofcontraception, according to curr<strong>en</strong>t age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Curr<strong>en</strong>t ageNeverusedNumber of living childr<strong>en</strong>at time of first use of contraception0 1 2 3 4+ MissingTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>15-19 85.9 9.6 3.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 100.0 1,76120-24 42.7 21.6 24.6 8.3 1.6 0.6 0.6 100.0 1,71525-29 27.4 12.3 33.7 15.5 6.3 4.3 0.5 100.0 1,45430-34 21.6 8.9 32.5 17.8 9.4 9.8 0.0 100.0 1,20935-39 27.2 4.8 23.8 11.5 11.6 21.1 0.0 100.0 87740-44 24.9 4.6 25.7 11.4 10.7 22.3 0.5 100.0 76845-49 35.8 4.9 11.2 10.9 9.0 28.2 0.1 100.0 661Total 42.3 11.1 21.8 10.0 5.6 8.7 0.5 100.0 8,4445.6 KNOWLEDGE OF FERTILE PERIODAn <strong>el</strong>em<strong>en</strong>tary knowledge of reproductive physiology provides a useful background forsuccessful practice of coitus-r<strong>el</strong>ated methods such as the rhythm method. The successful use of suchmethods dep<strong>en</strong>ds in part on an understanding of wh<strong>en</strong>, during the ovulatory cycle, a woman is mostlik<strong>el</strong>y to conceive. Wom<strong>en</strong> were asked: ‘From one m<strong>en</strong>strual period to the next, are there certain dayswh<strong>en</strong> a woman is more lik<strong>el</strong>y to get pregnant if she has sexual r<strong>el</strong>ations?’ If the answer was ‘yes’,they were further asked whether that time was just before her period begins, during her period, rightafter her period has <strong>en</strong>ded or halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> two periods. Table 5.7 provides the results for allwom<strong>en</strong>, as w<strong>el</strong>l as for wom<strong>en</strong> who report that they are curr<strong>en</strong>tly using the rhythm method and thosewho are not.Table 5.7 Knowledge of fertile periodPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by knowledge of thefertile period during the ovulatory cycle, according to curr<strong>en</strong>t useof the rhythm method, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Perceived fertile periodUsers ofrhythmmethodNonusersof rhythmmethodAllwom<strong>en</strong>Just before her m<strong>en</strong>strualperiod begins 10.9 14.3 14.2During her m<strong>en</strong>strual period 4.5 2.4 2.5Right after her m<strong>en</strong>strualperiod has <strong>en</strong>ded 41.7 29.5 29.9Halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> twom<strong>en</strong>strual periods 35.5 23.9 24.3Other 0.0 0.1 0.1No specific time 2.0 11.5 11.2Don’t know 5.4 18.1 17.7Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 272 8,172 8,44466 | Family Planning


The data show that only one in four wom<strong>en</strong> (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t) understands that a woman is mostlik<strong>el</strong>y to conceive halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> her m<strong>en</strong>strual periods. Almost one-third wrongly b<strong>el</strong>ieve that thefertile period is right after a woman’s period has <strong>en</strong>ded, fewer than one in five wom<strong>en</strong> say they do notknow wh<strong>en</strong> the fertile period falls, and 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve that there is no specific fertiletime.As expected, users of the rhythm method of family planning are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than non-users toknow that the fertile period in a woman’s m<strong>en</strong>strual cycle is halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> the start of her periods.5.7 TIMING OF STERILISATIONSterilisation is a very effective, perman<strong>en</strong>t method of family planning, which could beadopted by more couples who do not want any more childr<strong>en</strong>. Consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, it is useful to knowwhether the age at which wom<strong>en</strong> get sterilised is increasing or declining. Table 5.8 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tdistribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married, sterilised wom<strong>en</strong> by age at the time of sterilisation and median ageat sterilisation, according to the number of years since the operation. The results indicate that themedian age at sterilisation for wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya is 33. A plurality of wom<strong>en</strong> are sterilised wh<strong>en</strong> theyare 30-34 years, with most of the rest being sterilised in their late thirties or early forties. Very fewwom<strong>en</strong> are sterilised wh<strong>en</strong> they are less than age 25.Table 5.8 Timing of sterilisationPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of sterilised wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were sterilised in the three years before the surveyby age at the time of sterilisation and median age at sterilisation, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Years sinceoperationAge at time of sterilisation


Table 5.9 Source of modern contraception methodsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of users of modern contraceptive methods age 15-49 by most rec<strong>en</strong>t source of method, according to method,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09SourceFemalesterilisation Pill IUD Injectables ImplantsMalecondom Total 1Public 66.6 42.4 51.0 65.3 77.7 19.8 57.3Governm<strong>en</strong>t hospital 50.3 13.9 25.8 20.6 48.2 9.6 23.4Governm<strong>en</strong>t health c<strong>en</strong>tre 9.2 14.2 13.1 17.7 18.7 1.5 14.5Governm<strong>en</strong>t disp<strong>en</strong>sary 7.0 14.4 12.1 26.9 10.9 8.0 19.4Other public 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1Private medical 32.3 55.6 47.8 34.1 22.3 17.3 35.9Mission church hospital/clinic 17.0 2.2 11.1 3.7 1.9 1.1 4.9FHOK/FPAK/health c<strong>en</strong>tre/clinic 0.0 0.6 9.7 1.2 1.4 0.8 1.2Private hospital/clinic 14.6 12.0 27.1 25.5 18.1 1.1 19.4Pharmacy 0.0 40.5 0.0 3.5 0.0 14.3 10.2Nursing maternity home 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.2Other private medical 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other 0.7 1.6 1.2 0.5 0.0 59.7 6.3Mobile clinic 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.2CBD 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.4Shop 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.6 3.7Fri<strong>en</strong>d/r<strong>el</strong>ative 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 1.6Other 0.2 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.0 2.9 0.5Missing 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.5Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 269 398 85 1,246 110 220 2,3291Total includes other modern methods but excludes lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method (LAM).FHOK = Family Health Organisation of K<strong>en</strong>yaFPAK = Family Planning Association of K<strong>en</strong>yaCBD = Community-based distributorThe contribution of public sources to the provision of family planning had be<strong>en</strong> shrinking—from 68 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1993, to 58 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1998, and to 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003—but expanded slightly to57 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The contribution of the private medical sector shrank to 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09from 41 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. The largest decline in the private medical sector is for private hospitals andclinics, which supplied 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t of contraceptive users in 2008-09, down from 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003.5.9 COST OF CONTRACEPTIVE METHODSTable 5.10 reflects the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>t users of modern contraceptive methods whoreceived the method for free and the median cost for those who paid and could report a cost. Overall,about one in five wom<strong>en</strong> using a modern contraceptive method receives the method free of charge.The data indicate that a higher perc<strong>en</strong>tage of those who obtained their contraceptive methods from thepublic sector did not pay for the method (28 perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with those who sourced their methodsfrom the private medical sector (8 perc<strong>en</strong>t). This is true for every method included in the table;however, for those who pay for female sterilisation, the median cost is the same in the public sector asin the private medical sector, at K.shs 2,495. The median cost of pills, injectables, and implants ishigher in the private medical sector than in the public sector.68 | Family Planning


Table 5.10 Cost of modern contraceptive methodsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>t users of modern contraception age 15-49 who did not pay for the method and who do notknow the cost of the method and the median cost of the method by curr<strong>en</strong>t method, according to source of curr<strong>en</strong>tmethod, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Source of method/costFemalesterilisation Pill IUD Injectables ImplantsMalecondomPublic sectorPerc<strong>en</strong>tage free 54.1 30.8 57.2 16.4 35.6 70.8 27.7Do not know cost 10.4 0.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 22.2 2.4Median cost [in K.shs.] 1 2,495 18 * 30 (196) * 29Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 179 169 43 813 85 44 1,334Private medical sector/otherPerc<strong>en</strong>tage free 28.0 3.5 8.0 5.0 6.4 11.7 8.1Do not know cost 17.1 3.7 8.2 0.3 0.0 41.5 10.2Median cost [in K.shs.] 1 (2,497) 23 (997) 90 (996) 10 60Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 90 229 42 433 24 176 995TotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tage free 45.4 15.1 33.1 12.5 29.1 23.4 19.3Do not know cost 12.6 2.1 4.9 0.4 0.0 37.7 5.7Median cost [in K.shs.] 1 2,495 20 498 45 348 10 43Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 269 398 85 1,246 110 220 2,329Note: Table excludes lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method (LAM). Costs are based on the last time curr<strong>en</strong>t users obtainedmethod. Costs include consultation costs, if any. For condom, costs are per package; for pills, per cycle. Forsterilisation, data are based on wom<strong>en</strong> who received the operation in the 5 years before the survey. Numbers inpar<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweightedcases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Median cost is based only on those wom<strong>en</strong> who reported a costTotal5.10 INFORMED CHOICECurr<strong>en</strong>t users of modern methods who are informed of pot<strong>en</strong>tial side effects and problems ofeach method are best able to make an informed choice about the method they would like to use.Curr<strong>en</strong>t users of various modern contraceptive methods, who started the last episode of use within thefive years preceding the survey, were asked whether, at the time they were adopting the particularmethod, they were informed of possible side effects or problems and what to do if they experi<strong>en</strong>cedthem.Table 5.11 shows that almost all wom<strong>en</strong> (92 perc<strong>en</strong>t) who were sterilised during the five-yearperiod preceding the survey were informed that they would not be able to have any more childr<strong>en</strong>.Sixty-one perc<strong>en</strong>t of users of modern contraceptive methods were informed of other methodsavailable that could be used, while 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t were informed of the side effects or health problems ofthe method they were provided, and 52 perc<strong>en</strong>t were informed of what to do if they experi<strong>en</strong>ced sideeffects. The results also indicate that users of implants are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than users of other methods tobe informed of side effects or health problems (81 perc<strong>en</strong>t), other methods available (82 perc<strong>en</strong>t), andwhat to do if they experi<strong>en</strong>ced side effects (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Less than half of pill users were informed ofside effects or what to do if they experi<strong>en</strong>ced side effects.Family Planning | 69


Table 5.11 Informed choiceAmong curr<strong>en</strong>t users of modern methods age 15-49 who started the last episode of use within the five years preceding the survey,the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were informed about possible side effects or problems of that method, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were informedabout what to do if they experi<strong>en</strong>ced side effects, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were informed about other methods that could be used,by method and source; and among sterilised wom<strong>en</strong>, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were informed that the method is perman<strong>en</strong>t, by initialsource of method, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Method/sourceAmong wom<strong>en</strong> who started last episode of modern contraceptivemethod within five years preceding the survey:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whowere informedabout sideeffects orproblems ofmethod usedPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whowere informedabout what todo ifexperi<strong>en</strong>cedside effectsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whowere informedby a health orfamily planningworker of othermethods thatcould be usedNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Among wom<strong>en</strong> who weresterilised:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whowere informedthat sterilisationis perman<strong>en</strong>t 1Number ofwom<strong>en</strong>MethodFemale sterilisation 65.4 58.9 61.7 133 92.2 133Pill 48.1 39.5 55.4 322 na 0IUD 75.3 73.5 74.1 45 na 0Injectables 56.0 51.5 62.0 1,037 na 0Implants 81.4 78.2 81.8 96 na 0Initial source of method 2Public 63.1 56.0 67.4 1,072 91.1 102Governm<strong>en</strong>t hospital 69.7 65.2 74.1 417 90.4 68Governm<strong>en</strong>t health c<strong>en</strong>tre 59.9 50.5 59.2 296 * 17Governm<strong>en</strong>t disp<strong>en</strong>sary 58.1 49.9 66.5 359 * 17Private medical 48.7 46.4 53.6 523 (100.0) 29Mission church hospital/clinic 62.8 52.4 65.6 75 * 11Private hospital/ clinic 52.7 51.8 59.2 283 * 18Pharmacy 28.9 27.8 32.5 137 na 0Other private 23.7 24.7 16.9 71 * 2Total 57.2 51.9 60.9 1,665 92.2 133Note: Totals include sources with too few users to show separat<strong>el</strong>y as w<strong>el</strong>l as 33 users of other methods. Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses arebased on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicable1Among wom<strong>en</strong> who were sterilised in the five years preceding the survey2Source at start of curr<strong>en</strong>t episode of use5.11 CONTRACEPTIVE DISCONTINUATIONCouples can realise their reproductive goals only wh<strong>en</strong>they use contraceptive methods continuously. A promin<strong>en</strong>t concernfor managers of family planning programmes is the discontinuationof methods. In the 2008-09 KDHS ‘cal<strong>en</strong>dar’ section, all segm<strong>en</strong>tsof contraceptive use betwe<strong>en</strong> January 2003 and the date of interviewwere recorded, along with reasons for any discontinuation.One-year contraceptive discontinuation rates based on the cal<strong>en</strong>dardata are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 5.12. 1The data show that 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t of family planning users inK<strong>en</strong>ya discontinue using the method within 12 months of startingits use. Discontinuation rates are highest for users of condoms(59 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and the pill (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and lowest for injectables(29 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The rates in Table 5.12 are very similar to thoseproduced from the 2003 KDHS, indicating little change over thepast five years.Table 5.12 First-year contraceptivediscontinuation ratesPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of contraceptive users whodiscontinued use of a method within12 months after beginning its use,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09MethodTotalPill 43.2Injectables 29.0Male condom 58.9Rhythm method 33.3All methods 35.8Number of episodes of use 1,479Note: Table is based on episodes ofcontraceptive use that began 3-62months prior to the survey.1 The discontinuation rates pres<strong>en</strong>ted here include only those segm<strong>en</strong>ts of contraceptive use that began sinceJanuary 2003. The rates apply to the 3-63 month period prior to the survey; exposure during the month ofinterview and the two months prior are excluded to avoid the biases that may be introduced by unrecognisedpregnancies. These cumulative discontinuation rates repres<strong>en</strong>t the proportion of users discontinuing a methodwithin 12 months after the start of use. The rates are calculated by dividing the number of wom<strong>en</strong> discontinuinga method by the number exposed at that duration. The single-month rates are th<strong>en</strong> cumulated to produce a oneyearrate.70 | Family Planning


5.12 FUTURE USE OF CONTRACEPTIONAn important indicator of the changing demand for family planning is the ext<strong>en</strong>t to whichnon-users of contraception plan to use family planning in the future. In the KDHS, curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedwom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were not using a contraceptive method were asked about their int<strong>en</strong>tion to usefamily planning in the future. The results are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 5.13.Table 5.13 Future use of contraceptionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are not using acontraceptive method by int<strong>en</strong>tion to use in the future, according to number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Int<strong>en</strong>tionNumber of living childr<strong>en</strong> 10 1 2 3 4+TotalInt<strong>en</strong>ds to use 54.7 64.0 55.5 61.4 49.0 55.0Unsure 7.6 4.9 3.2 3.8 5.0 4.6Does not int<strong>en</strong>d to use 37.8 31.1 41.3 34.9 45.8 40.4Missing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 136 447 493 431 1,181 2,6871Includes curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancyFifty-five perc<strong>en</strong>t of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married female non-users say that they int<strong>en</strong>d to use familyplanning in the future, 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t do not int<strong>en</strong>d to use it, and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t are unsure. The proportion ofthose int<strong>en</strong>ding to use contraception increases only slightly with number of living childr<strong>en</strong>, from 55perc<strong>en</strong>t for those with no child to a peak of 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t for those with one child. Those who do notint<strong>en</strong>d to use contraception in the future are conc<strong>en</strong>trated among those with two childr<strong>en</strong> and thosewith four or more childr<strong>en</strong>.5.13 REASONS FOR NOT INTENDING TO USEAs m<strong>en</strong>tioned above, 55 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>in K<strong>en</strong>ya are not using contraception. Consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, thereasons why they are not using any family planning methodare of great interest to programme managers. Table 5.14pres<strong>en</strong>ts the distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married non-users whodo not int<strong>en</strong>d to use a contraceptive method in the future bythe main reason why they do not int<strong>en</strong>d to use.The data show that method-r<strong>el</strong>ated reasons—especiallyfear of side effects and health concerns—were themost commonly cited reasons for not int<strong>en</strong>ding to use familyplanning in the future. Other reasons for not using, suchas r<strong>el</strong>igious prohibitions, opposition to use, m<strong>en</strong>opause,infecundity, desire for many childr<strong>en</strong>, and infrequ<strong>en</strong>t sexwere each cited by 6-9 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> as the mainreason for not int<strong>en</strong>ding to use a family planning method inthe future.Table 5.14 Reason for not int<strong>en</strong>ding to usecontraception in the futurePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 who are not using contraception andwho do not int<strong>en</strong>d to use in the future by mainreason for not int<strong>en</strong>ding to use, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09ReasonTotalFertility-r<strong>el</strong>ated reasonsInfrequ<strong>en</strong>t sex/no sex 6.7M<strong>en</strong>opausal/had hysterectomy 8.5Subfecund/infecund 6.9Wants as many childr<strong>en</strong> as possible 7.8Opposition to useRespond<strong>en</strong>t opposed 7.9Husband/partner opposed 6.0Others opposed 0.1R<strong>el</strong>igious prohibition 9.0Lack of knowledgeKnows no method 2.3Knows no source 1.9Method-r<strong>el</strong>ated reasonsHealth concerns 14.9Fear of side effects 15.8Lack of access/too far 0.8Cost too much 0.4Inconv<strong>en</strong>i<strong>en</strong>t to use 0.6Interfere with body’s normalprocess 5.9Other 3.6Don’t know 0.6Missing 0.3Total 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 1,085Family Planning | 71


Table 5.15 pres<strong>en</strong>ts data on the preferredmethod of contraception for future use for curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> who are not using but say they int<strong>en</strong>dto use in the future. The largest perc<strong>en</strong>tage ofprospective users reported injectables as their preferredmethod (52 perc<strong>en</strong>t), with 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t citing pills, and8 perc<strong>en</strong>t favouring female sterilisation and implants.Method prefer<strong>en</strong>ce among married wom<strong>en</strong> under30 years and those over 30 years is similar, except thatolder wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than younger wom<strong>en</strong> toprefer female sterilisation and less lik<strong>el</strong>y to preferinjectables.5.14 EXPOSURE TO FAMILY PLANNING MESSAGESFor some time, the Division of ReproductiveHealth in the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitationtogether with various stakeholders has be<strong>en</strong> using<strong>el</strong>ectronic media to inform the population about familyplanning issues. Information on the lev<strong>el</strong> of publicTable 5.15 Preferred method of contraception forfuture usePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age15-49 who are not using a contraceptive method butwho int<strong>en</strong>d to use in the future by preferred method,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09MethodAge15-29 30-49exposure to a particular type of media allows policymakers to assess the most effective media forvarious target groups in the population. To gauge the effectiv<strong>en</strong>ess of such media on thedissemination of family planning information, respond<strong>en</strong>ts in the 2008-09 KDHS were asked whetherthey had heard or se<strong>en</strong> a family planning message on the radio or t<strong>el</strong>evision in the month precedingthe interview.Table 5.16 shows that about 3 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 in 4 m<strong>en</strong> has not be<strong>en</strong> exposed to familyplanning messages through the media. Most wom<strong>en</strong> (69 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and m<strong>en</strong> (71 perc<strong>en</strong>t) hear familyplanning messages through the radio, while almost 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> hear messages onthe t<strong>el</strong>evision, and 34 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> see messages in the print media.There is a sharp contrast betwe<strong>en</strong> urban and rural areas in exposure to family planningmessages through t<strong>el</strong>evision and print media. For example, 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofm<strong>en</strong> in urban areas are exposed to family planning messages through t<strong>el</strong>evision, compared with only29 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in rural areas. Variation by province in exposure ofwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> to family planning messages through the media is moderate, except that in Nairobiexposure to t<strong>el</strong>evision and to the newspaper and magazines is highest, while in North Easternprovince, exposure is minimal, especially for wom<strong>en</strong>. Exposure to family planning messages throughall media rises with lev<strong>el</strong> of education and with wealth quintile.TotalFemale sterilisation 4.7 14.7 8.4Male sterilisation 0.0 0.2 0.1Pill 11.8 12.6 12.1IUD 1.0 3.4 1.9Injectables 55.6 44.4 51.5Implants 8.3 6.8 7.7Condom 1.7 3.5 2.4Female condom 0.3 0.3 0.3Lactation am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea 0.1 0.0 0.0Periodic abstin<strong>en</strong>ce 1.8 1.4 1.6Withdrawal 0.4 0.5 0.4Other 0.9 1.7 1.2Unsure 13.6 10.6 12.5Missing 0.0 0.1 0.0Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 937 540 1,47772 | Family Planning


Table 5.16 Exposure to family planning messagesPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who heard or saw a family planning message on the radio or t<strong>el</strong>evision or in a newspaper in thepast few months, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicRadioT<strong>el</strong>evisionWom<strong>en</strong>Newspaper/magazineNone ofthesethreemediasources Number Radio T<strong>el</strong>evisionM<strong>en</strong>Newspaper/magazineNone ofthesethreemediasourcesNumberAge15-19 52.9 27.3 27.9 44.1 1,761 57.3 28.6 28.4 36.3 77620-24 75.0 43.3 37.6 23.6 1,715 75.9 42.0 44.9 18.9 63025-29 74.5 42.5 39.2 24.0 1,454 70.9 39.5 45.9 23.1 48330-34 75.2 40.6 36.9 23.9 1,209 76.2 43.5 42.6 16.1 46135-39 73.1 42.5 37.6 25.6 877 76.6 44.3 43.6 18.7 34440-44 70.2 37.6 30.0 27.4 768 79.6 41.0 41.3 16.3 30645-49 67.9 30.2 25.2 31.3 661 77.3 44.6 42.8 17.0 257Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 78.2 63.8 54.7 17.8 2,148 71.9 60.2 56.5 16.5 866Rural 66.1 29.0 27.1 33.0 6,296 71.1 31.3 34.2 25.2 2,392ProvinceNairobi 77.2 70.0 57.9 17.1 728 72.9 64.6 54.6 12.5 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 88.2 50.4 42.5 10.5 905 77.7 42.0 44.7 15.7 347Coast 60.9 40.5 30.8 36.5 674 54.9 29.7 25.3 36.9 252Eastern 52.6 27.5 25.4 45.7 1,376 64.0 35.5 35.6 29.8 530Nyanza 76.4 37.0 36.7 22.5 1,389 80.8 46.5 52.2 15.2 520Rift Valley 70.9 35.7 35.3 28.2 2,262 74.8 32.7 37.4 21.2 885Western 71.1 26.5 21.8 27.8 927 68.4 32.9 32.2 28.1 349North Eastern 11.6 4.3 3.9 87.1 184 42.7 22.5 24.4 56.8 62EducationNo education 29.6 10.6 5.0 69.1 752 35.7 8.3 2.1 64.3 112Primary incomplete 62.5 20.6 17.5 36.2 2,526 61.5 21.1 16.8 35.8 883Primary complete 72.8 38.3 31.4 25.8 2,272 73.8 33.9 31.9 22.5 804Secondary+ 82.3 59.6 58.3 15.3 2,894 78.6 55.0 61.8 12.1 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 39.9 10.0 9.5 59.6 1,393 61.3 17.8 19.7 37.6 457Second 66.0 16.4 19.2 33.0 1,483 67.1 19.8 25.6 32.1 577Middle 74.6 30.3 27.6 24.9 1,613 74.2 33.1 34.9 22.9 574Fourth 76.4 46.6 41.1 22.7 1,736 74.5 43.5 43.5 19.2 725Highest 80.0 68.1 58.8 15.7 2,220 74.6 61.6 60.0 12.7 926Total 15-49 69.1 37.8 34.1 29.2 8,444 71.3 39.0 40.2 22.9 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na na na 0 75.4 32.7 30.5 22.8 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na na na na 0 71.6 38.6 39.6 22.9 3,465na = Not applicableTable 5.17 shows that only one in four wom<strong>en</strong> has not be<strong>en</strong> exposed to condom messagesthrough the media. Most wom<strong>en</strong> (71 perc<strong>en</strong>t) hear about condoms through the radio, 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t hearmessages on the t<strong>el</strong>evision, 34 perc<strong>en</strong>t see messages in the print media, and 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t see them onbillboards.There is sharp contrast betwe<strong>en</strong> urban and rural areas in exposure to condom messagesthrough the t<strong>el</strong>evision and print media. For example, 66 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban wom<strong>en</strong> are exposed tocondom messages through the t<strong>el</strong>evision compared with only 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural wom<strong>en</strong>. Variation byprovince in exposure of wom<strong>en</strong> to condom messages through the media is not great, except inNairobi, where exposure to messages on t<strong>el</strong>evision, newspapers, and billboards is highest and in NorthEastern province, where exposure is minimal for all four types of media. Exposure of wom<strong>en</strong> tocondom messages through the media rises with lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth quintile.Family Planning | 73


Table 5.17 Exposure to condom messagesPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who heard or saw a condom message on the radio or t<strong>el</strong>evision orin a newspaper or on billboards in the past few months, according to background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic Radio T<strong>el</strong>evisionNewspaper/magazineBillboardsNone ofthese fourmediasourcesNumberAge15-19 62.7 33.3 32.5 34.2 31.9 1,76120-24 75.9 45.2 39.2 47.2 19.8 1,71525-29 75.1 43.1 37.0 48.4 20.8 1,45430-34 73.8 42.1 37.0 44.5 22.1 1,20935-39 71.2 40.0 34.6 41.3 25.6 87740-44 71.2 37.5 27.4 39.5 25.8 76845-49 68.8 30.8 22.5 33.2 28.9 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 78.4 66.3 52.4 62.7 13.8 2,148Rural 68.8 30.4 28.1 34.8 28.4 6,296ProvinceNairobi 79.0 75.5 56.9 64.1 11.7 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 89.9 53.5 43.6 54.7 7.0 905Coast 58.1 36.2 27.2 43.4 32.5 674Eastern 51.0 28.4 23.3 34.9 42.8 1,376Nyanza 80.7 42.1 40.8 48.7 17.2 1,389Rift Valley 75.5 37.1 36.1 38.2 22.9 2,262Western 73.8 25.7 20.6 27.9 23.1 927North Eastern 13.0 5.9 4.2 1.9 85.6 184EducationNo education 30.1 11.8 4.2 11.2 66.0 752Primary incomplete 66.3 23.3 18.2 27.5 30.9 2,526Primary complete 75.6 38.2 31.4 41.9 20.5 2,272Secondary+ 82.9 62.0 58.3 62.5 11.8 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 43.3 11.3 11.3 16.3 54.4 1,393Second 68.5 15.9 20.8 29.8 28.9 1,483Middle 75.2 31.1 28.8 35.2 22.5 1,613Fourth 79.8 49.4 40.2 49.8 15.7 1,736Highest 81.0 71.6 57.0 64.8 11.9 2,220Total 15-49 71.3 39.6 34.3 41.9 24.7 8,444Overall, about 7 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve that it is acceptable to use <strong>el</strong>ectronic and print media toair messages about condoms (Table 5.18). All the media are equally acceptable as vehicles foradvertising condoms.Urban wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than rural wom<strong>en</strong> to view dissemination of condom messagesin the media as acceptable. Other variations in the acceptability of dissemination of condom messagesin the print and <strong>el</strong>ectronic media are not large, except that wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province and thosewith no education are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to consider as acceptable the use of print and <strong>el</strong>ectronic media todisseminate condom messages.74 | Family Planning


Table 5.18 Acceptability of condom messagesPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who b<strong>el</strong>ieve that media messages on the radio or t<strong>el</strong>evision or ina newspaper or on billboards are acceptable, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic Radio T<strong>el</strong>evisionNewspaper/magazineBillboardsNone ofthese fourmediasourcesNumberAge15-19 67.7 63.0 63.9 61.3 30.6 1,76120-24 82.2 78.0 79.1 77.5 16.6 1,71525-29 78.5 71.6 74.6 72.0 19.6 1,45430-34 80.0 74.7 77.8 75.0 18.0 1,20935-39 76.2 69.3 73.1 71.6 21.4 87740-44 70.0 65.4 67.1 65.7 26.1 76845-49 66.9 60.4 62.3 62.3 31.4 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 81.4 77.0 79.4 77.4 16.5 2,148Rural 73.2 67.4 69.4 67.4 24.9 6,296ProvinceNairobi 80.9 77.3 78.9 76.8 17.7 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 72.4 68.5 73.3 70.5 23.7 905Coast 73.5 71.4 70.6 69.0 25.5 674Eastern 66.8 61.9 63.5 60.3 31.7 1,376Nyanza 83.8 80.3 81.6 79.9 15.5 1,389Rift Valley 77.6 69.0 73.3 72.4 19.5 2,262Western 81.9 75.1 72.9 70.8 16.7 927North Eastern 11.8 7.1 10.6 6.2 86.0 184EducationNo education 47.1 41.7 41.4 41.4 50.3 752Primary incomplete 73.4 66.8 66.9 64.9 25.4 2,526Primary complete 79.3 73.1 75.9 73.5 19.0 2,272Secondary+ 81.1 77.3 81.2 79.0 16.3 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 60.2 54.6 55.5 54.3 37.5 1,393Second 76.2 69.6 69.2 67.7 23.0 1,483Middle 75.5 70.1 71.9 70.3 23.1 1,613Fourth 78.0 71.9 75.2 72.8 20.0 1,736Highest 81.8 77.8 81.6 78.7 15.3 2,220Total 15-49 75.3 69.9 71.9 69.9 22.8 8,4445.15 CONTACT OF NON-USERS WITH FAMILY PLANNING PROVIDERSIn the 2008-09 KDHS, married wom<strong>en</strong> who were not using any family planning method wereasked if they had be<strong>en</strong> visited by a fi<strong>el</strong>d-worker who talked to them about family planning in the 12months preceding the survey. This information is especially useful for determining if non-users offamily planning are being reached by family planning programmes.The results in Table 5.19 show that only a small proportion (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> who are notusing any family planning method are being reached by fi<strong>el</strong>d-workers to discuss family planningissues. Only 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t who visited health facilities in the 12 months before the survey discussed issuesof family planning with the health facility staff. This implies that many opportunities are lost wh<strong>en</strong>pot<strong>en</strong>tial users can be educated on the b<strong>en</strong>efits of family planning.Family Planning | 75


Table 5.19 Contact of nonusers with family planning providersAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are not using contraception, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who during the last 12 monthswere visited by a fi<strong>el</strong>d-worker who discussed family planning, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who visited a health facilityand discussed family planning, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who visited a health facility but did not discuss familyplanning, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who neither discussed family planning with a fi<strong>el</strong>d-worker nor at a healthfacility, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage ofwom<strong>en</strong> whowere visited byfi<strong>el</strong>d-workerwho discussedfamily planningPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> whovisited a health facility in thepast 12 months and who:Discussedfamily planningDid not discussfamily planningPerc<strong>en</strong>tage ofwom<strong>en</strong> who neitherdiscussed familyplanning with fi<strong>el</strong>dworkernor at ahealth facilityNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 3.1 2.7 31.0 94.8 1,65720-24 6.2 11.6 42.2 84.3 1,24425-29 6.2 14.4 43.3 81.7 86930-34 5.7 14.5 43.1 82.7 60435-39 3.8 9.5 38.4 87.9 48340-44 5.2 8.5 33.6 87.7 43645-49 5.3 4.8 32.4 91.4 446Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 4.5 7.4 37.4 89.0 1,361Rural 5.1 9.3 37.5 87.5 4,378ProvinceNairobi 2.8 5.5 31.6 92.1 456C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.8 8.2 37.9 88.9 486Coast 4.2 14.3 35.3 83.0 494Eastern 4.8 10.6 43.7 86.7 879Nyanza 7.3 11.4 46.3 84.3 969Rift Valley 4.6 6.6 36.2 90.3 1,624Western 4.0 7.8 26.2 88.5 650North Eastern 9.0 5.4 32.6 89.2 180EducationNo education 4.4 8.3 35.4 89.2 660Primary incomplete 4.1 9.2 38.3 88.0 1,821Primary complete 5.7 9.9 38.9 86.4 1,455Secondary+ 5.3 7.8 36.3 88.5 1,803Wealth quintileLowest 6.0 9.1 35.3 87.5 1,177Second 5.4 9.8 39.6 86.8 1,068Middle 3.7 9.4 37.7 87.9 1,049Fourth 4.4 9.8 36.1 87.6 1,066Highest 4.9 6.7 38.6 89.2 1,379Total 4.9 8.8 37.5 87.9 5,7395.16 HUSBAND/PARTNER’S KNOWLEDGE OF WOMEN’S CONTRACEPTIVE USEUse of family planning methods is facilitated wh<strong>en</strong> couples discuss and agree on the issue. Toassess the ext<strong>en</strong>t to which wom<strong>en</strong> use contraception without t<strong>el</strong>ling their partners, married wom<strong>en</strong>interviewed in the 2008-09 KDHS were asked whether their husbands or partners knew that they wereusing a method of family planning.Table 5.20 shows that 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> reported that their husbands/partners knew they were using a method of family planning. There is no notable variation inhusbands/partners’ knowledge of use of family planning method by age or resid<strong>en</strong>ce; however, it doesincrease gradually with education and wealth quintile of the woman.M<strong>en</strong> were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with two statem<strong>en</strong>ts about family planninguse: 1) contraception is wom<strong>en</strong>’s business and a man should not have to worry about it; and 2) wom<strong>en</strong>who use contraception may become promiscuous. The results in Table 5.21 indicate that only16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve that contraception is wom<strong>en</strong>’s business only, while 4 in 10 m<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve thatwom<strong>en</strong> who use family planning may become promiscuous. Differ<strong>en</strong>ces by backgroundcharacteristics are not large; however, m<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi and m<strong>en</strong> with more education are less lik<strong>el</strong>y toexpress sexist views about family planning use, being less lik<strong>el</strong>y to b<strong>el</strong>ieve that wom<strong>en</strong> should bearthe burd<strong>en</strong> of dealing with contraception.76 | Family Planning


Table 5.20 Husband/partner’s knowledge of wom<strong>en</strong>’s use of contraceptionAmong curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are using a method, perc<strong>en</strong>tdistribution by whether they report that their husbands/partners know about their use,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic Knows 1Does notknowUnsurewhetherknows/missingTotalNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 79.1 20.8 0.2 100.0 4820-24 89.0 9.0 2.0 100.0 34225-29 90.2 6.6 3.2 100.0 49330-34 89.8 7.9 2.3 100.0 52835-39 90.6 8.4 1.0 100.0 35540-44 87.4 11.5 1.1 100.0 28745-49 88.1 9.1 2.7 100.0 188Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 92.1 5.6 2.3 100.0 613Rural 88.1 9.9 2.0 100.0 1,628ProvinceNairobi 92.6 4.6 2.8 100.0 201C<strong>en</strong>tral 92.6 6.1 1.3 100.0 357Coast 90.7 6.2 3.1 100.0 146Eastern 93.8 5.4 0.8 100.0 439Nyanza 81.0 16.2 2.8 100.0 310Rift Valley 87.8 9.7 2.5 100.0 542Western 86.0 11.6 2.4 100.0 241North Eastern * * * 100.0 4EducationNo education 75.6 14.4 10.0 100.0 80Primary incomplete 81.9 16.0 2.1 100.0 580Primary complete 90.9 7.0 2.0 100.0 692Secondary+ 93.9 4.7 1.4 100.0 890Wealth quintileLowest 81.4 15.3 3.3 100.0 175Second 83.9 12.9 3.2 100.0 354Middle 87.7 10.6 1.7 100.0 474Fourth 90.7 8.1 1.2 100.0 576Highest 93.9 4.0 2.1 100.0 662Total 89.2 8.7 2.1 100.0 2,241Note: An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that hasbe<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Includes wom<strong>en</strong> who report use of male sterilisation, male condoms, or withdrawalFamily Planning | 77


Table 5.21 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward contraceptionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who agree with statem<strong>en</strong>ts aboutcontraceptive use, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWoman’sbusinessWoman maybecomepromiscuousNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 18.3 45.4 77620-24 17.9 39.9 63025-29 17.2 42.7 48330-34 16.8 35.9 46135-39 12.0 31.4 34440-44 12.4 40.2 30645-49 15.9 41.5 257Marital statusNever married 19.0 45.1 1,524Married or living together 13.8 34.5 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 18.1 54.1 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 13.3 36.0 866Rural 17.5 41.9 2,392ProvinceNairobi 5.1 27.4 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 21.0 57.8 347Coast 13.4 33.1 252Eastern 23.4 40.7 530Nyanza 11.8 34.0 520Rift Valley 15.9 44.9 885Western 20.8 41.5 349North Eastern 21.8 13.3 62EducationNo education 22.7 28.1 112Primary incomplete 21.5 45.5 883Primary complete 18.3 40.7 804Secondary+ 11.8 37.9 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 17.5 37.0 457Second 18.3 35.8 577Middle 18.5 45.3 574Fourth 18.3 46.1 725Highest 11.8 37.2 926Total 16.4 40.3 3,25878 | Family Planning


OTHER PROXIMATE DETERMINANTS OF FERTILITY 6Alfred Agwanda and Vane LumumbaThis chapter addresses the principal factors, other than contraception, that affect a woman’srisk of becoming pregnant. These factors include marriage, polygyny, sexual activity, postpartumam<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, abstin<strong>en</strong>ce from sexual activity, and onset of m<strong>en</strong>opause. Direct measures of thebeginning of exposure to pregnancy and the lev<strong>el</strong> of exposure are also giv<strong>en</strong> in this chapter.6.1 CURRENT MARITAL STATUSMarriage is a primary indication of the regular exposure of wom<strong>en</strong> to the risk of pregnancyand therefore is important for the understanding of fertility. Populations in which age at first marriageis low t<strong>en</strong>d to have early childbearing and high fertility.Table 6.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> by marital status, according toage. The term married refers to legal or formal marriage, and the phrase living together designates aninformal union in which a man and a woman live together, ev<strong>en</strong> if a formal civil or r<strong>el</strong>igiousceremony has not occurred. In later tables that do not list living together as a separate category, thesewom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> are included in the curr<strong>en</strong>tly married group. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married,divorced, separated, or widowed are referred to as ever married.About 3 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> age15-49 have never be<strong>en</strong> married, 58 perc<strong>en</strong>t are either married orliving together with a man, and the remaining 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t are divorced, separated, or widowed. A lowproportion (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49 have never be<strong>en</strong> married. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> whohave never be<strong>en</strong> married has increased slightly since 2003 in every age group.Table 6.1 Curr<strong>en</strong>t marital statusPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by curr<strong>en</strong>t marital status, according to age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgeNevermarriedMarriedMarital statusLivingtogether Divorced Separated WidowedWOMENTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tage ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tscurr<strong>en</strong>tly inunionNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts15-19 87.2 10.9 1.2 0.1 0.7 0.0 100.0 12.0 1,76120-24 37.9 51.5 4.3 0.9 4.2 1.0 100.0 55.9 1,71525-29 15.5 71.4 3.5 1.5 6.2 1.9 100.0 74.9 1,45430-34 6.6 73.3 6.4 1.4 8.8 3.7 100.0 79.6 1,20935-39 6.5 73.1 6.0 2.4 4.9 7.1 100.0 79.1 87740-44 7.3 65.7 5.6 1.4 6.0 14.0 100.0 71.3 76845-49 4.7 65.7 4.8 2.8 5.3 16.6 100.0 70.5 661Total 15-49 31.2 54.2 4.1 1.3 4.8 4.4 100.0 58.4 8,444MEN15-19 99.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 100.0 0.4 77620-24 82.6 15.6 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.0 100.0 15.9 63025-29 33.0 57.7 3.7 1.3 4.0 0.3 100.0 61.4 48330-34 9.5 80.2 3.1 1.1 5.9 0.4 100.0 83.2 46135-39 5.2 82.4 3.1 0.1 6.2 3.0 100.0 85.5 34440-44 2.9 86.5 4.5 1.5 4.1 0.4 100.0 91.0 30645-49 0.3 89.6 2.0 2.9 3.7 1.5 100.0 91.6 257Total 15-49 46.8 46.9 2.0 0.7 3.0 0.6 100.0 48.9 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 0.3 83.2 7.2 2.1 1.6 5.5 100.0 90.4 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 44.0 49.0 2.3 0.8 2.9 0.9 100.0 51.4 3,465Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 79


Forty-four perc<strong>en</strong>t of the m<strong>en</strong> interviewed (age group 15-54) have never be<strong>en</strong> married, halfare curr<strong>en</strong>tly married, and only 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t are divorced, separated, or widowed. By age group 30-34, ahigher proportion of m<strong>en</strong> are curr<strong>en</strong>tly in any form of union compared with wom<strong>en</strong>. Wom<strong>en</strong> are alsomore lik<strong>el</strong>y than m<strong>en</strong> to report having an informal marital union (living together). Compared with the2003 KDHS, the proportion curr<strong>en</strong>tly married or living together has declined for most age groupsamong both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>. The proportion who are living together has also declined slightly forwom<strong>en</strong> but not at all for m<strong>en</strong>.6.2 POLYGYNYPolygyny (having more than one wife) is common in Africa and has implications forfrequ<strong>en</strong>cy of sexual activity and fertility. Table 6.2.1 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> by number of co-wives according to background characteristics. Polygyny wasmeasured by asking all curr<strong>en</strong>tly married female respond<strong>en</strong>ts whether their husbands or partners hadother wives, and if so, how many.Table 6.2.1 Number of wom<strong>en</strong>’s co-wivesPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by number of co-wives,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNumber of co-wives0 1 2+ MissingTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 92.5 5.0 1.7 0.8 100.0 21220-24 88.9 7.5 1.4 2.2 100.0 95825-29 89.0 8.0 1.7 1.3 100.0 1,08830-34 87.2 9.6 2.4 0.9 100.0 96235-39 80.8 12.7 3.7 2.8 100.0 69440-44 76.8 18.2 3.7 1.3 100.0 54845-49 76.8 15.1 6.9 1.3 100.0 466Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 90.6 6.1 1.1 2.3 100.0 1,154Rural 83.4 11.9 3.3 1.4 100.0 3,774ProvinceNairobi 94.2 2.4 0.0 3.5 100.0 363C<strong>en</strong>tral 96.0 2.9 0.5 0.6 100.0 535Coast 82.6 12.7 2.3 2.5 100.0 427Eastern 93.4 4.1 0.6 1.9 100.0 844Nyanza 78.4 16.4 4.2 1.0 100.0 832Rift Valley 83.3 10.8 4.1 1.8 100.0 1,279Western 76.5 17.9 4.9 0.7 100.0 518North Eastern 63.9 30.7 5.3 0.0 100.0 130EducationNo education 64.9 24.8 8.5 1.8 100.0 565Primary incomplete 81.3 13.3 3.6 1.8 100.0 1,440Primary complete 90.9 6.3 1.5 1.3 100.0 1,436Secondary+ 90.9 6.5 1.0 1.5 100.0 1,488Wealth quintileLowest 72.7 18.4 7.2 1.7 100.0 870Second 84.0 12.8 2.2 1.0 100.0 883Middle 83.7 12.5 2.6 1.3 100.0 952Fourth 90.3 6.0 2.6 1.1 100.0 1,012Highest 91.7 5.6 0.3 2.5 100.0 1,211Total 85.1 10.5 2.8 1.6 100.0 4,928Thirte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> live in polygynous unions (i.e., they have one ormore co-wives). Older wom<strong>en</strong> are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be in polygynous unions than younger wom<strong>en</strong>.Polygyny is more preval<strong>en</strong>t in rural than in urban areas (Figure 6.1). The regional distribution showssubstantial variation, with North Eastern province having the highest proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> inpolygynous marriages (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Nairobi province the lowest (2 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Western, Nyanza,Rift Valley, and Coast provinces all have proportions ranging betwe<strong>en</strong> 15 and 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Wom<strong>en</strong>with no or low education and those who are poorest are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to live in polygynous marriages.80 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


Figure 6.1 Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of Curr<strong>en</strong>tly Married Wom<strong>en</strong> WhoseHusbands Have At Least One Other WifeResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrbanRural715ProvinceNairobiC<strong>en</strong>tralCoastEasternNyanzaRift ValleyWesternNorth Eastern2351515212336EducationNo educationPrimary incompletePrimary completeSecondary+8817330 10 20 30 40 50Perc<strong>en</strong>tK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09M<strong>en</strong> who were interviewed were also asked if they had more than one wife. Data onpolygynous unions among curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 6.2.2. Sev<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried m<strong>en</strong> report having more than one wife. The pattern of polygyny reported by m<strong>en</strong> reflectsdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces by region and socioeconomic status similar to those of wom<strong>en</strong>, except that, among m<strong>en</strong>,polygyny is highest in Nyanza and lowest in C<strong>en</strong>tral province.There has be<strong>en</strong> only a slight decline in the lev<strong>el</strong> of polygyny from the preval<strong>en</strong>ce observed in2003. The proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> reporting one or more co-wives has declined from 16 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003 to 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008, and the proportion of married m<strong>en</strong> who report having more than onewife has declined from 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t to 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Table 6.2.2 Number of m<strong>en</strong>’s co-wivesPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by number of wives,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNumber of wives1 2+ MissingTotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 * * * 100.0 320-24 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 10025-29 95.3 4.2 0.5 100.0 29630-34 92.6 7.4 0.0 100.0 38435-39 92.4 7.6 0.0 100.0 29440-44 90.5 9.5 0.0 100.0 27945-49 91.9 7.8 0.3 100.0 236Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 96.3 3.5 0.1 100.0 523Rural 91.5 8.4 0.1 100.0 1,070ProvinceNairobi 98.3 1.3 0.5 100.0 164C<strong>en</strong>tral 99.5 0.5 0.0 100.0 151Coast 92.6 7.4 0.0 100.0 155Eastern 98.2 1.2 0.7 100.0 213Nyanza 84.6 15.4 0.0 100.0 247Rift Valley 92.3 7.7 0.0 100.0 486Western 92.2 7.8 0.0 100.0 141North Eastern 86.5 13.5 0.0 100.0 35Continued...Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 81


Table 6.2.2—ContinuedBackgroundcharacteristicNumber of wives1 2+ MissingTotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>EducationNo education 74.6 25.4 0.0 100.0 77Primary incomplete 92.5 7.5 0.0 100.0 335Primary complete 92.4 7.6 0.0 100.0 440Secondary+ 95.6 4.1 0.3 100.0 742Wealth quintileLowest 84.6 15.4 0.0 100.0 229Second 93.1 6.9 0.0 100.0 256Middle 92.5 7.5 0.0 100.0 236Fourth 92.3 7.2 0.5 100.0 288Highest 96.9 2.9 0.1 100.0 584Total 15-49 93.1 6.8 0.1 100.0 1,592M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 87.3 12.7 0.0 100.0 187Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 92.5 7.4 0.1 100.0 1,780Note: An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted casesthat has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.6.3 AGE AT FIRST MARRIAGEMarriage is g<strong>en</strong>erally associated with fertility because it is corr<strong>el</strong>ated with exposure to risk ofconception. The duration of exposure to the risk of pregnancy dep<strong>en</strong>ds primarily on the age at whichwom<strong>en</strong> first marry. Wom<strong>en</strong> who marry earlier, on average, have their first child earlier and give birthto more childr<strong>en</strong>, contributing to higher fertility rates.Table 6.3 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and of m<strong>en</strong> who have married by specific ages,according to curr<strong>en</strong>t age group. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> marrying by age 15 declines with age, fromless than 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 to over 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49. This is anindication that there has be<strong>en</strong> a shift in early <strong>en</strong>try into marriage over time. Half of all wom<strong>en</strong> <strong>en</strong>termarriage before their 20th birthday. Among wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-49, the median age at first marriage is 20years, indicating only a slight increase wh<strong>en</strong> compared with the median of 19.7 years in 2003. Themedian age at first marriage shows no consist<strong>en</strong>t pattern across age groups of wom<strong>en</strong>.The lower pan<strong>el</strong> of Table 6.3 shows the distribution of m<strong>en</strong> by age at first marriage. About 10perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> marry before their 20th birthday, and nearly half marry before age 25. The median ageat marriage among m<strong>en</strong> age 30 and above is 25.1 years and is unchanged since 2003. The median ageat first marriage for m<strong>en</strong> is almost constant across the age cohorts, reflecting stability over time.82 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


Table 6.3 Age at first marriagePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were first married by specific exact ages andmedian age at first marriage, according to curr<strong>en</strong>t age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Curr<strong>en</strong>t agePerc<strong>en</strong>tage first married by exact age:15 18 20 22 25WOMENPerc<strong>en</strong>tag<strong>en</strong>evermarriedNumberMedianage atfirstmarriage15-19 1.4 na na na na 87.2 1,761 a20-24 6.2 26.4 44.4 na na 37.9 1,715 a25-29 7.2 29.0 48.4 64.4 79.0 15.5 1,454 20.230-34 8.8 32.6 50.7 68.8 82.7 6.6 1,209 19.935-39 8.2 29.8 47.6 63.2 77.9 6.5 877 20.240-44 9.7 31.8 47.6 67.5 78.3 7.3 768 20.245-49 11.2 40.4 59.1 73.6 83.4 4.7 661 18.920-49 8.0 30.5 48.7 na na 16.5 6,683 a25-49 8.7 32.0 50.1 66.9 80.2 9.0 4,969 20.0MEN15-19 0.1 na na na na 99.5 776 a20-24 0.0 1.3 7.0 na na 82.6 630 a25-29 0.0 4.3 17.3 29.5 48.4 33.0 483 a30-34 0.3 3.1 9.3 22.0 51.9 9.5 461 24.835-39 0.4 4.3 8.3 16.9 41.8 5.2 344 25.840-44 2.0 5.4 12.6 24.9 47.4 2.9 306 25.445-49 0.0 5.1 8.4 21.3 47.7 0.3 257 25.220-49 0.4 3.5 10.4 na na 30.3 2,481 a25-49 0.5 4.3 11.6 23.4 47.8 12.4 1,852 a30-49 0.6 4.3 9.6 21.3 47.6 5.2 1,369 25.320-54 0.4 3.9 10.7 na na 28.0 2,689 a25-54 0.5 4.7 11.9 24.0 48.7 11.2 2,059 a30-54 0.6 4.8 10.3 22.3 48.8 4.6 1,576 25.1Note: The age at first marriage is defined as the age at which the respond<strong>en</strong>t began living withher/his first spouse/partnerna = Not applicable due to c<strong>en</strong>soringa = Omitted because less than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> married for the first time before reachingthe beginning of the age groupTable 6.4 shows the median age at first marriage for wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-49 by age groupaccording to background characteristics. Because of the small numbers of married respond<strong>en</strong>ts interviewed,data for wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 have be<strong>en</strong> omitted, and data for m<strong>en</strong> are not shown by age group.Urban wom<strong>en</strong> t<strong>en</strong>d to marry almost three years later than their rural counterparts. Thediffer<strong>en</strong>ce by province of resid<strong>en</strong>ce is more pronounced. Wom<strong>en</strong> from North Eastern, Nyanza,Western, Coast and Rift Valley provinces g<strong>en</strong>erally <strong>en</strong>ter into marriage earlier than wom<strong>en</strong> inNairobi, C<strong>en</strong>tral, and Eastern provinces. The differ<strong>en</strong>ce in median age at marriage betwe<strong>en</strong> NorthEastern and Nairobi provinces is more than six years (17.9 and 24.2). The pattern of provincialdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces has remained similar to that of 2003, although the median age for wom<strong>en</strong> has increasedslightly in most provinces. Median age at first marriage increases steadily as education lev<strong>el</strong> andwealth quintile increases.Although variations exist in median age at first marriage for m<strong>en</strong>, the differ<strong>en</strong>ces are not asgreat as for wom<strong>en</strong>. There is little differ<strong>en</strong>ce in the median age at first marriage betwe<strong>en</strong> m<strong>en</strong> in ruraland urban areas. The provincial differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> the highest (Nairobi) and lowest (Nyanza) age atmarriage is only three years. M<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> (especially) who are r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y poor or who have littleeducation <strong>en</strong>ter into marriage earlier than other m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>.Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 83


Table 6.4 Median age at first marriageMedian age at first marriage among wom<strong>en</strong> by five-year age groups age 25-49 and for m<strong>en</strong> age30-54, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWom<strong>en</strong> age25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Wom<strong>en</strong>age25-49M<strong>en</strong>age30-54Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 22.7 21.8 22.8 22.0 21.8 22.2 26.0Rural 19.5 19.5 19.6 19.9 18.6 19.4 24.8ProvinceNairobi 24.2 24.6 24.8 22.1 22.2 24.2 26.9C<strong>en</strong>tral 20.8 20.5 21.0 20.7 20.5 20.7 25.9Coast 19.4 20.0 19.1 21.1 18.1 19.5 24.7Eastern 19.8 20.5 20.3 20.7 19.0 20.2 25.2Nyanza 19.3 18.9 18.6 19.1 18.5 18.9 23.8Rift Valley 20.3 18.6 20.6 20.3 17.9 19.7 25.2Western 19.4 19.9 19.4 18.4 18.5 19.2 23.9North Eastern 17.6 17.1 18.7 (18.7) (17.7) 17.9 24.3EducationNo education 17.6 16.7 18.0 19.0 16.9 17.5 22.6Primary incomplete 18.3 18.1 18.5 17.7 17.4 18.1 23.9Primary complete 20.3 19.6 19.5 20.2 18.8 19.8 24.3Secondary+ 23.0 22.3 23.2 21.4 22.1 22.4 26.3Wealth quintileLowest 19.1 18.6 18.5 18.9 17.8 18.6 23.9Second 18.5 18.9 18.8 18.5 18.8 18.7 24.6Middle 19.1 20.3 18.7 19.0 18.0 19.1 24.5Fourth 20.3 19.6 21.1 21.0 19.2 20.3 25.4Highest 23.0 22.2 23.9 21.8 21.9 22.6 25.9Total 20.2 19.9 20.2 20.2 18.9 20.0 25.1Note: The age at first marriage is defined as the age at which the respond<strong>en</strong>t began living withher/his first spouse/partner. Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.a = Omitted because less than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> married for the first time beforereaching the beginning of the age group6.4 AGE AT FIRST SEXUAL INTERCOURSEAlthough age at first marriage is oft<strong>en</strong> used as a proxy for first exposure to intercourse, thetwo ev<strong>en</strong>ts do not necessarily occur at the same time. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> sometimes <strong>en</strong>gage in sexualr<strong>el</strong>ations before marriage. In the 2008-09 KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> were asked how old they werewh<strong>en</strong> they first had sexual intercourse. The perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and of m<strong>en</strong> who had sexualintercourse is giv<strong>en</strong> by exact ages in Table 6.5.Tw<strong>el</strong>ve perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 20-49 had sex before age 15, and about half had their first sexby their 18th birthday. Older wom<strong>en</strong> are slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have had their first sexual <strong>en</strong>counter atan earlier age, although the differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> the older and younger wom<strong>en</strong> is minimal.M<strong>en</strong> have an earlier sexual debut than wom<strong>en</strong>, a pattern that holds true for most age groups.For example, 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 20-49 had sex before age 15. Younger m<strong>en</strong> initiated sex muchearlier than older m<strong>en</strong>. Almost one in four m<strong>en</strong> under age 24 had their first sex before age 15.However, the median age at first sex ranges from 17 years for the younger m<strong>en</strong> to nearly 18 yearsamong the older m<strong>en</strong>.There has be<strong>en</strong> a slight increase in age at first sex wh<strong>en</strong> compared with data from 2003KDHS. The median age at first sex among wom<strong>en</strong> age 20-49 slightly increased from 17.8 years to18.2 years, while that of m<strong>en</strong> age 20-54 increased from 17.1 to 17.6 years.84 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


Table 6.5 Age at first sexual intercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had first sexual intercourse by exact ages,perc<strong>en</strong>tage who never had intercourse, and median age at first intercourse, according to curr<strong>en</strong>tage, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Curr<strong>en</strong>t agePerc<strong>en</strong>tage who had first sexual intercourseby exact age:15 18 20 22 25WOMENPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho neverhadintercourseNumberMedian ageat firstintercourse15-19 11.5 na na na na 63.3 1,761 a20-24 10.4 47.8 67.7 na na 14.0 1,715 18.225-29 12.6 44.9 67.3 78.6 86.3 2.6 1,454 18.330-34 14.0 51.5 70.3 81.0 85.7 0.5 1,209 17.935-39 12.1 44.7 64.5 76.6 82.2 0.9 877 18.440-44 10.5 46.5 67.4 79.8 85.0 0.2 768 18.245-49 15.5 52.9 68.7 81.3 85.8 0.4 661 17.720-49 12.3 47.8 67.7 na na 4.4 6,683 18.225-49 12.9 47.8 67.7 79.4 85.2 1.1 4,969 18.215-24 11.0 na na na na 39.0 3,475 aMEN15-19 22.3 na na na na 56.1 776 a20-24 22.0 58.2 80.5 na na 12.4 630 17.125-29 16.8 52.5 75.4 86.9 91.8 2.3 483 17.830-34 18.1 56.5 75.8 87.3 92.4 0.7 461 17.435-39 21.3 54.9 73.6 83.4 91.9 0.0 344 17.740-44 16.3 55.9 75.0 88.6 94.0 0.4 306 17.745-49 14.1 52.4 70.6 82.6 90.2 0.0 257 17.820-49 18.6 55.4 76.0 na na 3.8 2,481 17.625-49 17.5 54.5 74.4 86.0 92.1 0.8 1,852 17.715-24 22.2 na na na na 36.5 1,406 a20-54 18.6 54.9 75.5 na na 3.5 2,689 17.625-54 17.5 53.8 73.9 85.5 91.7 0.7 2,059 17.7na = Not applicable due to c<strong>en</strong>soringa = Omitted because less than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the respond<strong>en</strong>ts had intercourse for the first timebefore reaching the beginning of the age groupDiffer<strong>en</strong>tials in age at first sex are shown by background characteristics in Table 6.6. Wom<strong>en</strong>in rural areas start sexual activity about 2 years earlier than their urban counterparts. Among wom<strong>en</strong>age 25-49, sexual activity begins earliest in Nyanza province (16.5 years) and latest in Nairobi(20.3 years). With respect to education, wom<strong>en</strong> with at least some secondary education begin sexualactivity almost three years later than those with no education. Similarly, the wealthiest wom<strong>en</strong> t<strong>en</strong>d toinitiate sexual activity almost three years later than those who are poor.The data for m<strong>en</strong> show a pattern that differs from that for wom<strong>en</strong>, despite there being almostno differ<strong>en</strong>ces in the timing of first sexual activity betwe<strong>en</strong> those in rural and urban areas. The lowestmedian age at first sex for m<strong>en</strong> is in Western province (16.9 years), and the highest median age is inNorth Eastern province (24.3 years). Unlike the pattern for wom<strong>en</strong>, the median age at first sex amongm<strong>en</strong> has no consist<strong>en</strong>t pattern by lev<strong>el</strong> of education, and the differ<strong>en</strong>ces according to wealth status aresmall.Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 85


Table 6.6 Median age at first intercourseMedian age at first sexual intercourse among wom<strong>en</strong> by five-year age groups, age 20-49 and age 25-49, and for m<strong>en</strong>,age 20-54 and 25-54, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWom<strong>en</strong> age20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Wom<strong>en</strong>age20-49Wom<strong>en</strong>age25-49M<strong>en</strong>age20-54M<strong>en</strong>age25-54Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 18.9 19.5 18.9 20.3 20.6 19.9 19.5 19.8 17.9 17.9Rural 17.8 17.7 17.5 17.8 17.7 17.4 17.7 17.6 17.4 17.6ProvinceNairobi 19.7 20.1 19.8 22.3 21.2 19.8 a 20.3 17.6 17.7C<strong>en</strong>tral 19.5 18.2 18.6 18.2 18.3 18.7 18.6 18.4 18.5 18.8Coast 17.6 18.2 17.7 18.5 19.5 17.5 17.9 18.2 17.8 17.7Eastern 18.2 17.5 18.4 17.6 18.0 17.2 17.9 17.8 17.5 17.5Nyanza 17.1 16.8 16.1 16.8 16.6 16.5 16.7 16.5 17.4 17.5Rift Valley 18.4 18.7 17.8 18.8 18.8 18.0 18.5 18.5 17.3 17.6Western 17.6 18.0 16.8 17.6 17.3 17.3 17.5 17.5 16.8 16.9North Eastern 18.3 18.1 18.1 19.4 (18.7) (18.0) 18.4 18.5 a 24.3EducationNo education 16.3 17.5 16.3 18.0 17.2 16.8 17.1 17.3 18.0 17.7Primary incomplete 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.5 16.5 16.7 16.5 16.5 17.3 17.4Primary complete 18.2 18.2 17.6 18.2 18.1 17.2 18.0 18.0 17.2 17.3Secondary+ a 20.1 19.9 20.4 19.9 20.1 a 20.1 17.9 18.0Wealth quintileLowest 16.4 17.7 16.7 17.5 16.8 17.5 17.0 17.2 17.0 17.4Second 17.7 16.6 17.4 16.8 17.6 17.2 17.3 17.1 17.0 17.3Middle 17.8 17.2 17.1 17.8 17.2 16.8 17.4 17.3 17.6 17.7Fourth 18.6 18.4 17.9 18.9 18.5 17.6 18.3 18.3 18.0 18.1Highest 19.3 20.0 19.3 20.3 20.3 20.1 19.8 20.0 17.7 17.7Total 18.2 18.3 17.9 18.4 18.2 17.7 18.2 18.2 17.6 17.7Note: Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.a = Omitted because less than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the respond<strong>en</strong>ts had intercourse for the first time before reaching thebeginning of the age group6.5 RECENT SEXUAL ACTIVITYIn the abs<strong>en</strong>ce of contraception, the probability of pregnancy is r<strong>el</strong>ated to the frequ<strong>en</strong>cy ofintercourse. Thus, information on sexual activity can be used to refine measures of exposure topregnancy. Survey results are shown in Table 6.7.1 and 6.7.2 for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.Sev<strong>en</strong>te<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 have never had sexual intercourse.About 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> report that their last sexual <strong>en</strong>counter occurred more than oneyear before the survey. About half of the female and half of the male respond<strong>en</strong>ts reported a rec<strong>en</strong>tsexual <strong>en</strong>counter (within the last four weeks). The proportion of respond<strong>en</strong>ts having sex in the fourweeks preceding the survey is similar to that observed in 2003 for both m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>.Rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity is less common among the youngest age group, 15-19. Almost twothirds(63 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> and more than half of m<strong>en</strong> in this age group have never had sex. Rec<strong>en</strong>tsexual activity is more common among the curr<strong>en</strong>tly married, with slightly more than three-quartersof both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> having had sex in the four weeks before the survey. Male-female differ<strong>en</strong>cesare greatest for those who have never married and those who were formerly married. Among thosewho have never married, the proportion of m<strong>en</strong> who report a rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual <strong>en</strong>counter is about twicethat of wom<strong>en</strong> (17 and 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). This is also the case for those who were formerlymarried (26 and 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). These patterns have remained the same since 2003.86 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


Table 6.7.1 Rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by timing of last sexual intercourse, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Timing of last sexual intercourseBackground characteristicWithinthe last4 weeksWithin1 year 1One ormore yearsMissingNever hadsexualintercourseTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 13.2 14.4 8.9 0.2 63.3 100.0 1,76120-24 46.0 28.6 11.3 0.1 14.0 100.0 1,71525-29 64.6 23.2 9.2 0.4 2.6 100.0 1,45430-34 67.4 23.3 8.7 0.2 0.5 100.0 1,20935-39 64.4 21.3 12.5 0.9 0.9 100.0 87740-44 57.6 20.5 21.3 0.4 0.2 100.0 76845-49 53.1 21.4 25.2 0.0 0.4 100.0 661Marital statusNever married 7.8 20.6 17.8 0.2 53.5 100.0 2,634Married or living together 77.4 19.5 2.8 0.3 0.0 100.0 4,928Divorced/separated/widowed 12.8 38.7 48.0 0.4 0.0 100.0 881Marital duration 20-4 years 78.1 20.9 0.9 0.2 0.0 100.0 1,0815-9 years 78.5 19.5 1.6 0.4 0.0 100.0 1,13610-14 years 77.9 20.2 1.8 0.1 0.0 100.0 80215-19 years 78.6 18.2 2.3 0.8 0.0 100.0 66620-24 years 77.3 17.8 4.6 0.3 0.0 100.0 49425+ years 67.1 22.0 10.7 0.2 0.0 100.0 480Married more than once 83.9 14.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 270Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 50.1 21.9 12.1 0.2 15.7 100.0 2,148Rural 48.6 21.9 12.2 0.3 17.0 100.0 6,296ProvinceNairobi 47.2 24.1 12.4 0.3 16.0 100.0 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 55.9 16.0 10.7 0.2 17.2 100.0 905Coast 50.8 23.6 9.4 0.0 16.2 100.0 674Eastern 48.9 21.9 9.6 0.9 18.7 100.0 1,376Nyanza 47.2 26.5 13.9 0.4 12.0 100.0 1,389Rift Valley 47.4 22.3 14.5 0.0 15.7 100.0 2,262Western 47.7 17.9 12.1 0.0 22.3 100.0 927North Eastern 53.9 15.7 7.2 0.7 22.6 100.0 184EducationNo education 49.9 27.4 16.4 0.3 6.0 100.0 752Primary incomplete 49.2 21.0 10.3 0.2 19.3 100.0 2,526Primary complete 53.2 21.4 11.8 0.3 13.2 100.0 2,272Secondary+ 45.1 21.6 13.1 0.3 19.9 100.0 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 46.1 24.9 13.6 0.2 15.3 100.0 1,393Second 46.5 23.4 12.3 0.4 17.3 100.0 1,483Middle 47.7 22.5 11.0 0.2 18.5 100.0 1,613Fourth 51.4 19.0 11.7 0.4 17.5 100.0 1,736Highest 51.3 20.8 12.4 0.2 15.2 100.0 2,220Total 49.0 21.9 12.2 0.3 16.7 100.0 8,4441Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> who had sexual intercourse within the last 4 weeks2Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> who are not curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedOther Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 87


Table 6.7.2 Rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by timing of last sexual intercourse, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Timing of last sexual intercourseBackground characteristicWithinthe last4 weeksWithin1 year 1Oneor moreyearsMissingNever hadsexualintercourseTotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 9.4 15.3 19.1 0.0 56.1 100.0 77620-24 30.8 34.1 22.7 0.0 12.4 100.0 63025-29 61.4 28.7 6.9 0.7 2.3 100.0 48330-34 73.1 21.2 5.0 0.1 0.7 100.0 46135-39 73.5 19.3 6.8 0.3 0.0 100.0 34440-44 69.3 26.2 4.0 0.0 0.4 100.0 30645-49 74.4 19.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 257Marital statusNever married 16.9 25.4 22.7 0.2 34.7 100.0 1,524Married or living together 79.3 19.5 1.0 0.1 0.0 100.0 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 25.6 47.8 26.6 0.0 0.0 100.0 142Marital duration 20-4 years 79.6 19.1 1.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 3395-9 years 80.3 18.4 0.9 0.4 0.0 100.0 36110-14 years 79.0 20.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 23515-19 years 76.5 20.5 3.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 17720-24 years 78.2 21.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 11425+ years (65.3) (32.1) (2.6) (0.0) (0.0) 100.0 44Married more than once 82.3 17.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 323Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 60.7 21.0 7.5 0.1 10.7 100.0 866Rural 43.1 24.4 14.0 0.2 18.2 100.0 2,392ProvinceNairobi 60.0 24.6 9.7 0.0 5.7 100.0 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 49.8 21.0 14.1 0.0 15.2 100.0 347Coast 55.1 24.4 7.2 0.0 13.4 100.0 252Eastern 38.1 20.4 16.7 0.2 24.6 100.0 530Nyanza 46.7 24.4 13.0 0.5 15.4 100.0 520Rift Valley 50.5 24.9 9.9 0.1 14.5 100.0 885Western 38.9 26.7 16.4 0.0 17.9 100.0 349North Eastern 49.4 9.7 3.3 0.0 37.7 100.0 62EducationNo education 55.1 24.0 10.0 0.0 10.9 100.0 112Primary incomplete 36.7 24.8 12.9 0.3 25.3 100.0 883Primary complete 51.4 25.4 10.4 0.0 12.7 100.0 804Secondary+ 52.0 21.6 13.2 0.2 13.1 100.0 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 48.2 20.8 9.4 0.0 21.6 100.0 457Second 40.1 24.3 17.5 0.0 18.1 100.0 577Middle 42.9 24.6 15.2 0.4 17.0 100.0 574Fourth 40.6 25.0 14.6 0.3 19.5 100.0 725Highest 61.1 22.6 6.9 0.0 9.4 100.0 926Total 15-49 47.8 23.5 12.3 0.1 16.2 100.0 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 62.9 19.6 16.7 0.8 0.0 100.0 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 48.7 23.3 12.6 0.2 15.3 100.0 3,465Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.1Excludes m<strong>en</strong> who had sexual intercourse within the last 4 weeks2Excludes m<strong>en</strong> who are not curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedThe proportions of wom<strong>en</strong> reporting rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity do not differ much by rural-urbanresid<strong>en</strong>ce; however, urban m<strong>en</strong> are considerably more lik<strong>el</strong>y than rural m<strong>en</strong> to report being sexuallyactive. Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity by education lev<strong>el</strong> and wealth do not show consist<strong>en</strong>tpatterns. Wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral and North Eastern provinces are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to have be<strong>en</strong> sexually activein the four weeks before the survey, as were m<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi and Coast province.88 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


6.6 POSTPARTUM AMENORRHOEA, ABSTINENCE, AND INSUSCEPTIBILITYPostpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea refers to the interval betwe<strong>en</strong> childbirth and the return ofm<strong>en</strong>struation. The l<strong>en</strong>gth and int<strong>en</strong>sity of breastfeeding influ<strong>en</strong>ce the duration of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, whichoffers protection from conception. Postpartum abstin<strong>en</strong>ce refers to the period betwe<strong>en</strong> childbirth andthe time wh<strong>en</strong> a woman resumes sexual activity. D<strong>el</strong>aying the resumption of sexual r<strong>el</strong>ations can alsoprolong protection. Wom<strong>en</strong> are considered to be insusceptible to pregnancy if they are not exposed tothe risk of conception either because their m<strong>en</strong>strual period has not resumed since a birth or becausethey are abstaining from intercourse after childbirth.Wom<strong>en</strong> who gave birth in the three years preceding the survey were asked about the durationof their periods of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea and sexual abstin<strong>en</strong>ce following each birth. The results are pres<strong>en</strong>tedin Table 6.8. Almost all wom<strong>en</strong> (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are insusceptible to pregnancy within the first twomonths following childbirth. The contribution of abstin<strong>en</strong>ce is greatly reduced after the second month.At 10 to 11 months after birth, about 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t of mothers are still am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic, but only 18 perc<strong>en</strong>tare abstaining. Two years after birth, the proportion am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic drops sharply, such that at 24-25months following childbirth, only 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t are am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t are still insusceptible tothe risk of pregnancy.Table 6.8 Postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, abstin<strong>en</strong>ce and insusceptibilityPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of births in the three years preceding the survey for whichmothers are postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic, abstaining, and insusceptible,by number of months since birth, and median and mean durations,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Monthssince birthPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of births for which the mother is:Am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic Abstaining insusceptibleNumberof births


Table 6.9 shows the median durations of postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, andinsusceptibility by background characteristics. Older wom<strong>en</strong> (age 30 and over) have a slightly longermedian period of insusceptibility because of the longer duration of postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea. Wom<strong>en</strong>living in urban areas have a shorter median duration of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea and, h<strong>en</strong>ce, a shorter period ofinsusceptibility than rural wom<strong>en</strong>. There are considerable variations in the period of insusceptibilityby province. The median duration is longest in Nyanza (12.2 months) but shortest in Nairobi (5.2months) and C<strong>en</strong>tral (6.6 months) provinces. The median duration of insusceptibility has declined formost of the provinces since 2003. The median durations of both am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea and insusceptibilitydecline as the lev<strong>el</strong> of education of the mother increases. The poorest wom<strong>en</strong> have the longestdurations of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, and h<strong>en</strong>ce insusceptibility.Table 6.9 Median duration of am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, postpartum abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, andpostpartum insusceptibilityMedian number of months of postpartum am<strong>en</strong>orrhoea, postpartumabstin<strong>en</strong>ce, and postpartum insusceptibility following births in the threeyears preceding the survey, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPostpartumam<strong>en</strong>orrhoeaPostpartumabstin<strong>en</strong>cePostpartuminsusceptibility 1Mother’s age15-29 8.1 3.4 10.030-49 10.2 2.6 10.9Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 4.5 3.0 8.4Rural 9.7 3.2 11.2ProvinceNairobi (4.3) (2.5) (5.2)C<strong>en</strong>tral 5.4 (3.6) 6.6Coast 9.9 2.4 11.0Eastern 11.1 2.3 11.8Nyanza 9.7 2.5 12.2Rift Valley 9.4 5.2 10.2Western 7.7 3.5 9.3North Eastern 11.5 2.1 11.7EducationNo education 12.1 4.3 12.9Primary incomplete 10.3 3.2 11.5Primary complete 9.3 2.4 10.2Secondary+ 6.3 3.4 8.8Wealth quintileLowest 11.8 3.9 12.6Second 8.7 2.9 11.3Middle 9.1 3.5 10.1Fourth 7.8 3.0 9.2Highest 4.9 2.7 6.3Total 8.9 3.1 10.3Note: Medians are based on the status at the time of the survey (curr<strong>en</strong>tstatus). Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted births in thesmoothed d<strong>en</strong>ominator.1Includes births for which mothers are either still am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic or stillabstaining (or both) following birth6.7 MENOPAUSEAnother factor influ<strong>en</strong>cing the risk of pregnancy is m<strong>en</strong>opause. In the context of the availablesurvey data, wom<strong>en</strong> are considered m<strong>en</strong>opausal if they are neither pregnant nor postpartumam<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic, and have not had a m<strong>en</strong>strual period in the six months preceding the survey (Table6.10). The preval<strong>en</strong>ce of m<strong>en</strong>opause increases with age, ranging from 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 30-34to 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 48-49. Overall, 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 30-49 were reported to bem<strong>en</strong>opausal compared with 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003.90 | Other Proximate Determinants of Fertility


Table 6.10 M<strong>en</strong>opausePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 30-49who are m<strong>en</strong>opausal, 1 by age,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgePerc<strong>en</strong>tagem<strong>en</strong>opausalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>30-34 4.5 1,20935-39 5.5 87740-41 12.6 34842-43 12.9 26344-45 15.2 33546-47 26.4 25348-49 41.9 230Total 11.2 3,5151Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong> who ar<strong>en</strong>ot pregnant and not postpartumam<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic whose last m<strong>en</strong>strualperiod occurred six or more monthspreceding the surveyOther Proximate Determinants of Fertility | 91


FERTILITY PREFERENCES 7George Kichamu and H<strong>en</strong>ry OsoroInformation on fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces is of considerable importance to family planningprogrammes because it allows planners to assess the need for contraception, whether for spacing orlimiting of births, and also to assess the ext<strong>en</strong>t of unwanted and mistimed pregnancies. Data onfertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces may also be useful as an indicator of the direction that future fertility efforts of acountry’s citiz<strong>en</strong>s may take.The 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) included questions to ascertainfertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces. Wom<strong>en</strong> who were either not pregnant or unsure about their pregnancy statuswere asked the question: Would you like to have (a/another) child or would you prefer not to have any(more) childr<strong>en</strong>? A differ<strong>en</strong>t question was posed to wom<strong>en</strong> who were pregnant at the time of thesurvey. Pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> were asked: After the child you are expecting, would you like to haveanother child or would you prefer not to have any more childr<strong>en</strong>? The wom<strong>en</strong> who indicated that theywanted another child were asked how long they would like to wait before the birth of the next child.Finally, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked the total number of childr<strong>en</strong> they would like to have if they were to startchildbearing afresh.Giv<strong>en</strong> that ongoing family planning programmes seek to address both m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> andthat m<strong>en</strong> play a crucial role in the realisation of reproductive goals, the 2008-09 KDHS also includedquestions that <strong>el</strong>icited information on the fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces of m<strong>en</strong>. The responses to thesequestions provide a basis for the classification of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> by their fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces.7.1 DESIRE FOR MORE CHILDRENData on desire for more childr<strong>en</strong> can indicate future reproductive behaviour provided that therequired family planning services are available, affordable, and accessible to allow people to realisetheir fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces. Table 7.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> bythe desire for more childr<strong>en</strong> and according to the number of living childr<strong>en</strong>.The table shows that there is widespread desire among K<strong>en</strong>yans to control the timing andnumber of births they have. Among all curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, almost half do not want to haveanother child (49 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and an additional 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t are already sterilised (Figure 7.1). Over onequarter(27 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of married wom<strong>en</strong> would like to wait two years or more for their next birth, and14 perc<strong>en</strong>t would like to have a child soon (within two years). The remainder are uncertain about theirfertility desires or say they are unable to get pregnant (infecund). Proportions are similar amongcurr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong>, though m<strong>en</strong> t<strong>en</strong>d to be slightly more pro-natalist than wom<strong>en</strong>.The table shows that fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces are clos<strong>el</strong>y r<strong>el</strong>ated to the number of living childr<strong>en</strong> aperson already has. About three in four married wom<strong>en</strong> without a child want to have a child soon.This proportion declines dramatically as wom<strong>en</strong> have more childr<strong>en</strong>, so that among wom<strong>en</strong> with fiveor more childr<strong>en</strong>, only 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t want to have another one soon. Similarly, only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childlesswom<strong>en</strong> say they don’t want to have a child at all. However, wom<strong>en</strong> show greater interest incontrolling the pace of child bearing once they have a child. The proportion wanting no more childr<strong>en</strong>rises from 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> with one living child to 75 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with five or mor<strong>el</strong>iving childr<strong>en</strong>. The pattern is similar for m<strong>en</strong>.Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces | 93


Table 7.1 Fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces by number of living childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by desire for childr<strong>en</strong>,according to number of living childr<strong>en</strong>, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Desire for childr<strong>en</strong>Number of living childr<strong>en</strong> 10 1 2 3 4 5 6+WOMENTotal15-49Have another soon 2 76.0 30.4 15.1 7.9 5.0 4.1 3.7 13.7Have another later 3 13.5 55.2 43.7 26.0 13.4 8.8 5.7 26.5Have another, undecided wh<strong>en</strong> 2.7 2.3 1.6 3.6 2.4 1.6 1.5 2.2Undecided 2.0 2.9 2.9 3.7 4.0 1.5 2.2 2.9Want no more 2.5 8.1 35.1 54.2 66.3 74.7 74.8 48.8Sterilised 4 0.0 0.3 1.3 3.5 7.3 9.3 10.4 4.8Declared infecund 3.2 0.7 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.0 1.7 0.9Missing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 179 747 1,021 905 733 460 884 4,928MENHave another soon 2 73.7 27.7 15.7 10.2 9.4 9.6 9.4 16.4Have another later 3 12.3 58.1 42.6 27.7 20.0 14.4 14.7 30.6Have another, undecided wh<strong>en</strong> 7.3 5.4 2.0 0.8 1.4 0.6 4.6 2.7Undecided 1.5 1.3 6.5 10.5 3.3 2.9 5.1 5.1Want no more 3.7 7.4 33.0 50.0 63.1 72.2 63.3 44.0Sterilised 4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 2.1 0.3 2.9 0.9Declared infecund 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0Missing 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.3Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 62 261 322 296 258 145 249 1,5921The number of living childr<strong>en</strong> includes curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy for wom<strong>en</strong>; for m<strong>en</strong>, it includes one additionalchild if the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s wife is pregnant (or if any wife is pregnant for m<strong>en</strong> with more than one curr<strong>en</strong>t wife).2Wants next birth within 2 years3Wants to d<strong>el</strong>ay next birth for 2 or more years4Includes both female and male sterilisationThere have be<strong>en</strong> some changes in fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces among married wom<strong>en</strong> since 2003. Theproportion of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> who want another child soon has declined slightly (from 16 to14 perc<strong>en</strong>t), as has the proportion who want another child later in life (from 29 to 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Theproportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> who either want no more childr<strong>en</strong> or who have be<strong>en</strong> sterilised increasedfrom 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Also notable is an increase in the proportion ofmarried m<strong>en</strong> who want no more childr<strong>en</strong> or who are sterilised, from 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 45 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2008-09.Figure 7.1 Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces among Curr<strong>en</strong>tly MarriedWom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-49Undecided3%Infecund1%Sterilised5%Wants child,undecided wh<strong>en</strong>2%Wants no more49%Wants child soon(within 2 years)14%Wants child later(after 2 years)27%K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0994 | Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces


7.2 DESIRE TO LIMIT CHILDBEARING BY BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICSThe desire to stop childbearing by resid<strong>en</strong>ce, province, education, and wealth index is shownin Table 7.2 for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>.Table 7.2 Desire to limit childbearingPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who want no more childr<strong>en</strong>, by number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNumber of living childr<strong>en</strong> 10 1 2 3 4 5 6+Totalwom<strong>en</strong>15-49Totalm<strong>en</strong>15-49Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 1.6 11.0 44.8 66.2 79.2 86.7 81.8 43.9 37.0Rural 3.1 6.6 31.9 55.6 72.5 83.5 85.5 56.6 48.8ProvinceNairobi 3.3 18.4 64.4 76.7 68.7 87.8 96.4 48.2 28.5C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.0 4.4 51.9 78.0 93.6 95.3 93.4 63.6 61.4Coast 0.0 15.1 33.0 43.6 62.0 57.9 73.5 42.2 42.5Eastern 0.0 5.5 46.5 75.8 84.6 94.1 90.9 64.5 62.1Nyanza 2.8 8.2 27.5 46.4 64.4 87.8 92.9 49.0 41.3Rift Valley 8.1 2.5 24.9 48.2 72.2 88.9 86.0 53.9 42.1Western 0.0 8.4 23.6 50.9 77.7 78.0 95.1 57.5 49.8North Eastern 0.0 0.0 5.2 3.1 0.6 2.9 9.9 4.6 0.0EducationNo education 0.0 9.1 13.0 22.8 29.5 47.7 60.9 37.2 19.0Primary incomplete 0.0 11.9 29.2 60.4 69.6 81.8 92.4 59.1 43.5Primary complete 0.0 4.9 37.4 51.5 83.6 93.4 93.4 56.0 50.8Secondary+ 5.4 8.8 44.3 71.3 83.5 96.9 92.1 52.1 44.7Wealth quintileLowest 0.0 6.3 13.6 30.5 56.8 69.6 69.7 46.0 38.5Second 0.0 5.9 31.2 58.4 69.4 79.7 92.7 59.9 51.5Middle 0.0 8.7 36.8 53.9 79.5 92.2 92.7 60.4 49.2Fourth 0.0 9.1 40.3 68.2 76.7 93.2 90.2 58.4 53.2Highest 6.2 9.3 42.8 70.9 85.9 87.4 85.0 45.1 38.7Total 2.5 8.4 36.4 57.7 73.6 84.0 85.3 53.6 44.9Note: Wom<strong>en</strong> who have be<strong>en</strong> sterilised are considered to want no more childr<strong>en</strong>. M<strong>en</strong> who have be<strong>en</strong>sterilised or who state in response to the question about desire for childr<strong>en</strong> that their wife has be<strong>en</strong> sterilisedare considered to want no more childr<strong>en</strong>.1The number of living childr<strong>en</strong> includes the curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy.Overall, rural wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than urban wom<strong>en</strong> to want no more childr<strong>en</strong>; however,this is mainly because rural wom<strong>en</strong> already have more childr<strong>en</strong> than urban wom<strong>en</strong> do. Wh<strong>en</strong> th<strong>en</strong>umber of living childr<strong>en</strong> is h<strong>el</strong>d constant, the pattern is reversed, that is, urban wom<strong>en</strong> are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than rural wom<strong>en</strong> to want no more childr<strong>en</strong>. For example, among wom<strong>en</strong> with three childr<strong>en</strong>,66 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban wom<strong>en</strong> want no more childr<strong>en</strong>, compared with 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural wom<strong>en</strong>.Overall, the proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> who want no more childr<strong>en</strong> is highest in Easternand C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces (64-65 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and lowest in North Eastern province (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Wom<strong>en</strong> inNorth Eastern province and, to a lesser ext<strong>en</strong>t, those in Coast province, are far more pro-natalist thanwom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces. For example, 86-96 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> want to stop childbearingafter the sixth child in all provinces except North Eastern, where only 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> want tostop after six births, and Coast province, where 74 perc<strong>en</strong>t want to stop.Substantial differ<strong>en</strong>ces in fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces among wom<strong>en</strong> by lev<strong>el</strong>s of education areappar<strong>en</strong>t. For example, among married wom<strong>en</strong> with 3 childr<strong>en</strong>, 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with no educationwant to stop childbearing compared with 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with some secondary education. Foreach category of number of childr<strong>en</strong>, the desire to have no more childr<strong>en</strong> g<strong>en</strong>erally increases with thewealth index.Fertility prefer<strong>en</strong>ces among m<strong>en</strong> show similar patterns to those for the wom<strong>en</strong>, althoughoverall proportions of m<strong>en</strong> who do not want to have more childr<strong>en</strong> are lower. It is notable that theproportion of married m<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern rovince who want no more childr<strong>en</strong> is nil.Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces | 95


7.3 NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING SERVICESThe proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who want to stop childbearing or who want to space their next birthis a crude measure of the ext<strong>en</strong>t of the need for family planning, giv<strong>en</strong> that not all of these wom<strong>en</strong> areexposed to the risk of pregnancy and some of them may already be using contraception. This sectiondiscusses the ext<strong>en</strong>t of need and the pot<strong>en</strong>tial demand for family planning services. Wom<strong>en</strong> who wantto postpone their next birth for two or more years or who want to stop childbearing altogether but ar<strong>en</strong>ot using a contraceptive method are said to have an unmet need for family planning. Pregnantwom<strong>en</strong> are considered to have an unmet need for spacing or limiting their childr<strong>en</strong> if their pregnancywas mistimed or unwanted. Similarly, am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic wom<strong>en</strong> are categorised as having an unmet needif their last birth was mistimed or unwanted. Wom<strong>en</strong> who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly using family planning are saidto have a met need for family planning. The total demand for family planning services comprisesthose who fall in the met need and the unmet need categories.Table 7.3 pres<strong>en</strong>ts data on unmet need, met need, and total demand for family planningservices for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, as w<strong>el</strong>l as totals for wom<strong>en</strong> who are not curr<strong>en</strong>tly married andfor all wom<strong>en</strong>. K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> continue to experi<strong>en</strong>ce a high unmet need for family planning, withroughly one-quarter of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> in the three consecutive KDHS surveys since 1998indicating that they have unmet need for family planning. In 2008-09, 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>had an unmet need, which was ev<strong>en</strong>ly split betwe<strong>en</strong> unmet need for spacing births and unmet need forlimiting births. With 46 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a contraceptive method (met need),the total demand for family planning comprises 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>. Only 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t of thetotal demand for family planning is met.The lev<strong>el</strong> of unmet need for spacing and limiting of childr<strong>en</strong> varies by backgroundcharacteristics and reveals the expected patterns: that is, unmet need for spacing declines with the ageof the woman while need for limiting increases with age, resulting in a fairly constant lev<strong>el</strong> of totalunmet need across age groups. Unmet need for family planning continues to be higher in rural areas(27 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than in urban areas (20 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Nyanza province has the highest perc<strong>en</strong>tage of marriedwom<strong>en</strong> with an unmet need for family planning (32 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by Rift Valley province (31perc<strong>en</strong>t), while Nairobi, North Eastern, and C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces have the lowest unmet need at 15-16perc<strong>en</strong>t. Western province recorded the greatest improvem<strong>en</strong>t in unmet need, declining from 32perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> in 2003 to 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Unmet need increased considerablyamong wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral and North Eastern provinces.Married wom<strong>en</strong> with incomplete primary education have the highest unmet need for familyplanning (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with those with completed primary education (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t), noeducation (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and secondary and higher education (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Unmet need declinessteadily as wealth increases, from 38 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest quintile to 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofthose in the highest quintile.Total demand for family planning increases with age, from 15-19 years to 40-44 years, afterwhich it declines. Demand for family planning is slightly higher among urban wom<strong>en</strong> than amongrural wom<strong>en</strong> and is highest among wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province and lowest among wom<strong>en</strong> in NorthEastern province. Total demand is lowest among wom<strong>en</strong> with no education and wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowestwealth quintile.Table 7.3 also pres<strong>en</strong>ts the unmet need for family planning for wom<strong>en</strong> who are not curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried and for all wom<strong>en</strong>. Unmet need for unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> and all wom<strong>en</strong> is much lower (3 and16 perc<strong>en</strong>t), compared with need of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The overall demand is alsolower—48 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong>, compared with 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married wom<strong>en</strong>. Surprisingly, theoverall perc<strong>en</strong>tage of demand that is satisfied is highest among unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> (81 perc<strong>en</strong>t),compared with married wom<strong>en</strong> (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and all wom<strong>en</strong> (66 perc<strong>en</strong>t).96 | Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces


Table 7.3 Need and demand for family planning among curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with unmet need for family planning, perc<strong>en</strong>tage with met need for family planning, the totaldemand for family planning, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage for whom the demand for contraception is satisfied, by background characteristics, and totals forunmarried wom<strong>en</strong> and all wom<strong>en</strong>, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicForspacingUnmet need forfamily planning 1ForlimitingTotalMet need for family planning(curr<strong>en</strong>tly using 2 )ForspacingForlimitingTotalForspacingTotal demand forfamily planningForlimitingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof demandsatisfiedNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 25.6 4.0 29.7 20.7 1.8 22.5 46.3 5.8 52.2 43.1 21220-24 24.0 6.1 30.1 28.2 7.5 35.7 52.2 13.6 65.8 54.2 95825-29 16.6 10.0 26.7 27.1 18.2 45.3 43.7 28.2 72.0 62.9 1,08830-34 11.5 11.0 22.4 18.1 36.8 54.9 29.6 47.8 77.3 71.0 96235-39 5.9 18.7 24.6 9.0 42.1 51.2 14.9 60.9 75.8 67.5 69440-44 2.1 22.4 24.5 2.6 49.9 52.5 4.7 72.3 77.0 68.2 54845-49 1.2 20.2 21.4 0.6 39.8 40.4 1.8 59.9 61.7 65.4 466Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 10.7 9.5 20.2 29.5 23.5 53.1 40.3 33.0 73.3 72.4 1,154Rural 13.5 13.8 27.3 13.8 29.3 43.1 27.3 43.1 70.4 61.3 3,774ProvinceNairobi 6.5 8.6 15.1 27.1 28.2 55.3 33.6 36.8 70.4 78.6 363C<strong>en</strong>tral 6.1 9.5 15.6 22.5 44.2 66.7 28.6 53.6 82.3 81.1 535Coast 16.2 9.2 25.4 19.3 15.0 34.3 35.5 24.2 59.7 57.4 427Eastern 10.2 13.4 23.7 13.3 38.7 52.0 23.5 52.2 75.7 68.8 844Nyanza 18.6 13.1 31.7 14.8 22.5 37.3 33.4 35.6 69.0 54.1 832Rift Valley 13.7 17.4 31.1 18.4 24.0 42.4 32.1 41.3 73.4 57.7 1,279Western 13.9 12.0 25.8 17.0 29.6 46.5 30.8 41.5 72.4 64.3 518North Eastern 14.7 1.3 16.0 3.0 0.5 3.5 17.7 1.7 19.5 17.7 130EducationNo education 16.9 8.8 25.7 4.2 10.0 14.1 21.1 18.8 39.8 35.4 565Primary incomplete 15.8 17.3 33.2 12.8 27.5 40.3 28.6 44.8 73.4 54.8 1,440Primary complete 13.2 13.8 27.0 19.5 28.7 48.2 32.7 42.5 75.2 64.1 1,436Secondary+ 8.1 8.8 16.9 25.3 34.6 59.8 33.4 43.3 76.7 78.0 1,488Wealth quintileLowest 20.1 17.8 38.0 7.6 12.5 20.1 27.8 30.3 58.1 34.6 870Second 15.8 16.6 32.5 12.5 27.5 40.0 28.4 44.2 72.5 55.2 883Middle 10.6 11.7 22.3 14.4 35.4 49.8 25.0 47.1 72.1 69.0 952Fourth 11.0 9.1 20.1 19.1 37.9 56.9 30.1 47.0 77.1 73.9 1,012Highest 8.7 10.2 18.9 29.4 25.3 54.7 38.2 35.4 73.6 74.3 1,211Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 12.9 12.8 25.6 17.5 28.0 45.5 30.4 40.7 71.1 64.0 4,928Unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> 2.2 0.9 3.2 6.8 6.4 13.2 9.0 7.4 16.4 80.7 3,516All wom<strong>en</strong> 8.4 7.8 16.3 13.0 19.0 32.0 21.5 26.8 48.3 66.3 8,4441Unmet need for spacing: Includes wom<strong>en</strong> who are fecund and not using family planning and who say they want to wait two or more years fortheir next birth, or who say they are unsure whether they want another child, or who want another child but are unsure wh<strong>en</strong> to have the child.In addition, unmet need for spacing includes pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> whose curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy was mistimed, or whose last pregnancy was unwantedbut who now say they want more childr<strong>en</strong>. Unmet need for spacing also includes am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic wom<strong>en</strong> whose last birth was mistimed, or whos<strong>el</strong>ast birth was unwanted but who now say they want more childr<strong>en</strong>.Unmet need for limiting: Includes wom<strong>en</strong> who are fecund and not using family planning and who say they do not want another child. Inaddition, unmet need for limiting includes pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> whose curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy was unwanted but who now say they do not want morechildr<strong>en</strong> or who are undecided whether they want another child. Unmet need for limiting also includes am<strong>en</strong>orrhoeic wom<strong>en</strong> whose last birthwas unwanted but who now say they do not want more childr<strong>en</strong> or who are undecided whether they want another child.2Using for spacing is defined as wom<strong>en</strong> who are using some method of family planning and say they want to have another child or are undecidedwhether to have another. Using for limiting is defined as wom<strong>en</strong> who are using and who want no more childr<strong>en</strong>. Note that the specific methodsused are not tak<strong>en</strong> into account here.7.4 IDEAL NUMBER OF CHILDRENThis section focuses on the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong>, implicitly taking intoaccount the number of childr<strong>en</strong> that the respond<strong>en</strong>t already has. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, regardless ofmarital status, were asked about the number of childr<strong>en</strong> they would choose to have if they could startafresh. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had no childr<strong>en</strong> were asked, ‘If you could choose exactly the number ofchildr<strong>en</strong> to have in your whole life, how many would that be?’ For respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had childr<strong>en</strong>, thequestion was rephrased as follows: ‘If you could go back to the time wh<strong>en</strong> you did not have anychildr<strong>en</strong> and could choose exactly the number of childr<strong>en</strong> to have in your whole life, how many wouldthat be?’ Responses to these questions are summarised in Table 7.4 for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49.Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces | 97


Table 7.4 Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong>, and mean ideal numberof childr<strong>en</strong> for all respond<strong>en</strong>ts and for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married respond<strong>en</strong>ts, according to number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Ideal numberof childr<strong>en</strong>Number of living childr<strong>en</strong> 10 1 2 3 4 5 6+WOMEN0 1.9 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.01 2.6 4.9 3.0 2.0 1.1 1.0 0.3 2.42 26.4 30.4 28.3 14.6 15.4 14.4 5.0 21.23 26.8 28.1 25.4 24.1 10.5 14.5 7.7 21.54 25.6 25.1 28.8 35.4 46.2 28.9 29.8 30.25 8.1 4.2 6.3 10.1 9.5 16.2 12.1 8.76+ 5.5 5.1 5.8 9.2 13.3 20.0 35.8 11.5Non-numeric responses 3.1 1.8 1.9 3.5 3.6 4.4 8.7 3.6Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 2,249 1,270 1,338 1,106 872 554 1,055 8,444Mean ideal number ofchildr<strong>en</strong> for: 2All wom<strong>en</strong> 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.8 4.1 4.3 5.4 3.8Number 2,178 1,248 1,312 1,068 840 529 963 8,139Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.4 5.5 4.0Number 172 730 1,002 876 705 440 806 4,731MEN0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.21 1.8 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.0 0.7 1.32 22.8 23.2 26.2 10.1 14.4 12.0 4.3 19.43 25.0 36.3 29.6 31.5 12.2 10.7 11.7 24.64 28.4 25.4 26.7 31.3 36.9 31.0 24.9 28.75 10.4 6.3 4.8 9.2 7.1 16.2 5.2 8.86+ 9.0 4.3 6.5 13.6 22.7 26.1 39.0 12.9Non-numeric responses 2.3 3.4 5.2 3.7 5.9 3.0 14.1 4.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 1,566 361 352 306 270 149 253 3,258Mean ideal numberchildr<strong>en</strong> for: 2All m<strong>en</strong> 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.3 4.8 4.8 6.6 4.0Number 1,530 348 334 294 254 145 218 3,123Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> 3.7 3.2 3.3 4.3 4.8 4.9 6.7 4.4Number 62 255 304 285 245 140 213 1,503Mean ideal numberchildr<strong>en</strong> for m<strong>en</strong> 15-54: 2All m<strong>en</strong> 3.7 3.4 3.4 4.3 4.8 4.9 7.0 4.2Number 1,532 352 349 316 270 170 318 3,308Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.3 4.8 4.9 7.0 4.6Number 62 258 311 305 260 165 311 1,6721The number of living childr<strong>en</strong> includes curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy for wom<strong>en</strong>; for m<strong>en</strong>, it includes oneadditional child if the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s wife is pregnant (or if any wife is pregnant for m<strong>en</strong> with more thanone curr<strong>en</strong>t wife).2Means are calculated excluding respond<strong>en</strong>ts who gave non-numeric responses.TotalThe 2008-09 KDHS findings indicate that almost all wom<strong>en</strong> and all m<strong>en</strong> provided a numericresponse, with only 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of both g<strong>en</strong>ders failing to do so. Among wom<strong>en</strong> who gave a numericresponse, the mean ideal family size is 3.8, a slight decline from the lev<strong>el</strong> of 3.9 recorded in the 2003KDHS. Wom<strong>en</strong> with more living childr<strong>en</strong> have higher ideal family sizes than those with smallerfamilies. For example, wom<strong>en</strong> with six or more living childr<strong>en</strong> have an ideal family size of 5.4,compared with only 3.2 for those with one child. This pattern could be attributed to either those withsmaller family sizes t<strong>en</strong>ding to achieve their desired small families or <strong>el</strong>se to ‘adjustm<strong>en</strong>ts’ of idealnumber of childr<strong>en</strong> as the actual number increased (rationalisation).The mean ideal family size among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 is slightly higher than for wom<strong>en</strong> (4.0versus 3.8, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y), a pattern that has remained unchanged over time. Among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49,the ideal family size ranges from 3.7 for those without a child to 6.6 for m<strong>en</strong> with six or more livingchildr<strong>en</strong>.98 | Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces


Four childr<strong>en</strong> is the most commonly reported ideal for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, followed bythree childr<strong>en</strong>; only about one in five wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> say that having two childr<strong>en</strong> is ideal. Finally,results show that considerable proportions of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> report ideal family sizes smaller thantheir actual family sizes. For example, 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 47 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> with six or mor<strong>el</strong>iving childr<strong>en</strong> report ideal family sizes of less than six childr<strong>en</strong>.7.5 MEAN IDEAL NUMBER OF CHILDREN BY BACKGROUND CHARACTERISTICSTable 7.5 shows the mean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> by age and background characteristics ofall wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>. Data in the table show that both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> in rural areas have higher idealfamily sizes (4.0 and 4.3, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y) than their urban counterparts (3.1 and 3.4). Among theprovinces, North Eastern province continues to record the highest ideal family sizes for wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong> (8.8 and 15.5), followed by Coast province for wom<strong>en</strong> (4.6) and Rift Valley for m<strong>en</strong> (4.4).Table 7.5 Mean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> by background characteristicsMean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> among wom<strong>en</strong> by five-year age groups,, for all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, and for allm<strong>en</strong> age 15-54, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAge15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Allwom<strong>en</strong>All m<strong>en</strong>15-54Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 4.0 3.1 3.4Rural 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.9 4.4 4.5 4.9 4.0 4.3ProvinceNairobi 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.8 3.3C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.0 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.1 3.3Coast 4.6 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.0 5.0 7.1 4.6 4.0Eastern 3.1 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.4 4.2 4.7 3.4 3.4Nyanza 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.3 4.2 3.7 4.1Rift Valley 3.6 3.6 3.7 4.2 4.8 4.6 5.3 4.0 4.4Western 3.7 3.5 3.8 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.9 3.9 4.1North Eastern 7.7 7.9 9.1 9.0 10.4 (12.9) (9.2) 8.8 15.5EducationNo education 7.0 5.8 6.6 6.4 6.8 6.3 6.2 6.4 10.4Primary incomplete 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.8 4.5 4.6 5.1 4.0 4.4Primary complete 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.8 3.8 4.2 4.7 3.6 4.1Secondary+ 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.1 3.4Wealth quintileLowest 4.7 4.7 5.0 5.1 5.8 5.5 6.2 5.1 6.0Second 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.8 3.9 4.4Middle 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.7 3.8 3.9Fourth 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.7 4.2 4.4 3.4 3.6Highest 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.3 3.6 3.0 3.4Total 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.3 4.8 3.8 4.2Note: Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.Education strongly r<strong>el</strong>ates to desired family size, with wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with no educationhaving the highest mean ideal family size and those with secondary or higher education having th<strong>el</strong>owest. Similarly, perceived ideal family size decreases steadily as wealth of both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>increases.7.6 FERTILITY PLANNING STATUSThe issue of unplanned and unwanted fertility was investigated in the 2008-09 KDHS byasking wom<strong>en</strong> who had births during the five years before the survey whether the births were wantedat the time (planned), wanted but at a later time (mistimed), or not wanted at all (unwanted). Forwom<strong>en</strong> who were pregnant at the time of the interview, this question was also asked with refer<strong>en</strong>ce tothe curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy. The procedure required the respond<strong>en</strong>ts to recall accurat<strong>el</strong>y their wishes at oneor more points in their last five years. Care has to be exercised in interpreting the results because anunwanted conception may have become a cherished child, leading to the rationalisation of responsesto these questions.Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces | 99


According to Table 7.6 and Figure 7.2, 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births in K<strong>en</strong>ya are unwanted, and 26perc<strong>en</strong>t are mistimed (wanted later). There has be<strong>en</strong> little change since 2003 in the proportions ofbirths that are unwanted and mistimed. The proportion of births considered to be unwanted registereda marginal reduction from 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09, and the proportion ofmistimed births increased from 25 to 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the same period.Table 7.6 Fertility planning statusPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of births to wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 in the five years preceding the survey(including curr<strong>en</strong>t pregnancies), by planning status of the birth, according to birth order andmother’s age at birth, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Planning status of birthBirth order andmother’s age at birthWantedth<strong>en</strong>WantedlaterWantedno moreMissingTotalNumberof birthsBirth order1 62.2 24.6 13.1 0.1 100.0 1,4462 65.9 26.6 7.4 0.1 100.0 1,3543 59.4 28.8 11.7 0.0 100.0 1,0774+ 48.9 24.1 26.7 0.3 100.0 2,569Mother’s age at birth


7.7 WANTED FERTILITY RATESUsing information on whether births occurring inthe five years before the survey were wanted or not, a total‘wanted’ fertility rate can be calculated. The wantedfertility rate measures the pot<strong>en</strong>tial demographic impact ofavoiding unwanted births. It is calculated in the samemanner as the conv<strong>en</strong>tional total fertility rate, except thatunwanted births are excluded. A birth is consideredwanted if the number of living childr<strong>en</strong> at the time ofconception is less than the ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong>reported by the respond<strong>en</strong>t. The gap betwe<strong>en</strong> wanted andactual fertility shows how successful wom<strong>en</strong> are inachieving their reproductive int<strong>en</strong>tions. A comparison ofthe total wanted fertility rates and total fertility rates forthe three years preceding the survey by backgroundcharacteristics is pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 7.7.The total wanted fertility rate for K<strong>en</strong>ya is 3.4,more than one child less than the actual total fertility rateof 4.6. Except for North Eastern province, where the totalwanted fertility rate is the same as the actual total fertilityrate (5.9), the lev<strong>el</strong> of wanted fertility is lower than actualfertility for all other provinces and backgroundcharacteristics. The gap betwe<strong>en</strong> wanted and observedfertility is greatest among poor wom<strong>en</strong>, those living inWestern province and in rural areas, and those with lessthan secondary education.Table 7.7 Wanted fertility ratesTotal wanted fertility rates and total fertility ratesfor the three years preceding the survey, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicTotalwantedfertility rateTotalfertility rateResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.5 2.9Rural 3.7 5.2ProvinceNairobi 2.4 2.8C<strong>en</strong>tral 2.6 3.4Coast 4.2 4.8Eastern 2.9 4.4Nyanza 3.9 5.4Rift Valley 3.5 4.7Western 3.6 5.6North Eastern (5.9) (5.9)EducationNo education 5.8 6.7Primary incomplete 3.7 5.5Primary complete 3.6 4.9Secondary+ 2.5 3.1Wealth quintileLowest 5.3 7.0Second 3.6 5.6Middle 3.6 5.0Fourth 2.8 3.7Highest 2.5 2.9Total 3.4 4.6Note: Rates are calculated based on births towom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 in the period 1-36 monthspreceding the survey. Rates in par<strong>en</strong>theses arebased on 500-750 unweighted wom<strong>en</strong>. The totalfertility rates are the same as those pres<strong>en</strong>ted inTable 4.2.Fertility Prefer<strong>en</strong>ces | 101


INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITY 8Collins Opiyo, Christopher Omolo, and Andrew ImbwagaThis chapter pres<strong>en</strong>ts lev<strong>el</strong>s, tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and differ<strong>en</strong>tials in neonatal, postneonatal, infant, child,and perinatal mortality. The information is r<strong>el</strong>evant for the planning and evaluation of health policiesand programmes and serves the needs of the health sector by id<strong>en</strong>tifying population groups that are athigh risk. Infant and child mortality rates are also regarded as indices that reflect the degree of povertyand deprivation of a population. Under-five mortality and infant mortality rates are two of theindicators used to monitor child health under Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goal (MDG) #4. Because thegovernm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya, through the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation and the Ministry ofMedical Services, is undertaking a number of interv<strong>en</strong>tions aimed at reducing childhood mortality inthe country, the analysis in this report provides an opportunity to evaluate the performance of suchprograms.In the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS), the data for mortalityestimation were collected in the birth history section of the Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire. The birth historysection began with questions about the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s experi<strong>en</strong>ce with childbearing (i.e., the number ofsons and daughters living with the mother, the number who live <strong>el</strong>sewhere, and the number who havedied). These questions were followed by a retrospective birth history in which the respond<strong>en</strong>t wasasked to list each of her births, starting with the first birth. For each birth, data were obtained on sex,month, and year of birth, survivorship status, and curr<strong>en</strong>t age, or, if the child had died, the age atdeath. This information was used to directly estimate mortality. Age-specific mortality rates arecategorized and defined as follows:• Neonatal mortality (NN): the probability of dying within the first month of life• Postneonatal mortality (PNN): the differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> infant and neonatal mortality• Infant mortality ( 1 q 0 ): the probability of dying before the first birthday• Child mortality ( 4 q 1 ): the probability of dying betwe<strong>en</strong> the first and fifth birthday• Under-five mortality ( 5 q 0 ): the probability of dying betwe<strong>en</strong> birth and the fifth birthdayAll rates are expressed per 1,000 live births, except for child mortality, which is expressed per1,000 childr<strong>en</strong> surviving to 12 months of age.8.1 LEVELS AND TRENDS IN INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITYTable 8.1 shows neonatal, postneonatal, infant, child, and under-five mortality rates for threesuccessive five-year periods before the survey. For the five years immediat<strong>el</strong>y preceding the survey(approximate cal<strong>en</strong>dar years 2004-2008), the infant mortality rate is 52 per 1,000 live births and theunder-five mortality is 74 deaths per 1,000 live births. This implies that one in every 19 childr<strong>en</strong> bornin K<strong>en</strong>ya dies before its first birthday, while one in every 14 does not survive to age five. Neonatalmortality is 31 deaths per 1,000 live births, while postneonatal mortality is 21 per 1,000 live birthsduring the same period. Thus, 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t of infant deaths in K<strong>en</strong>ya occur during the first month oflife.Infant and Child Mortality | 103


Table 8.1 Early childhood mortality ratesNeonatal, postneonatal, infant, child, and under-five mortality rates for five-year periods preceding thesurvey, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Years precedingthe surveyApproximatecal<strong>en</strong>daryearsNeonatalmortality(NN)Postneonatalmortality(PNN 1 )Infantmortality( 1 q 0 )Childmortality( 4 q 1 )Under-fivemortality( 5 q 0 )0-4 2004-2008 31 21 52 23 745-9 1999-2003 35 32 67 29 9510-14 1994-1998 25 34 59 37 931Computed as the differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> the infant and neonatal mortality ratesThe results show remarkable declines in all lev<strong>el</strong>s of childhood mortality from rates observedin the 2003 KDHS. Figure 8.1 shows infant and under-five mortality rates for the 15-year periodpreceding the 2008-09 KDHS and the 2003 KDHS. Comparing data for the five-year period precedingeach survey, under-five mortality has declined by 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t from 115 deaths per 1,000 in the 2003KDHS to 74 deaths per 1,000 in the 2008-09 KDHS, while infant mortality has dropped by 32 perc<strong>en</strong>tfrom 77 deaths per 1,000 in the 2003 survey to 52 deaths per 1,000 in the 2008-09 survey.Postneonatal mortality declined more than 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t from 44 deaths per 1,000 in the 2003 KDHS to21 deaths per 1,000 in the 2008-09 KDHS. Results from the 2005/06 K<strong>en</strong>ya Integrated HouseholdBudget Survey also showed a decline following the 2003 KDHS, with rates of 92 deaths per 1,000 forunder-five mortality and 60 deaths per 1,000 live births for infant mortality (KNBS, 2008).Figure 8.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Infant and Under-Five Mortality2003 KDHS and 2008-09 KDHS120100Deaths per 1,000 live births#Under-five mortality####8060,Infant mortality,,,,#,402001990 1995 2000 2005Cal<strong>en</strong>dar year, 2003 KDHS Infant mortality # 2003 KDHS Under-five mortality, 2008-09 Infant mortality # 2008-09 Under-five mortalityThe recorded decline indicates the first signs that the country is making progress towardsachieving MDG #4. The improvem<strong>en</strong>t in child survival could be attributed at least in part to variousgovernm<strong>en</strong>t programmes. For example, the substantial increases in childhood immunization coverag<strong>el</strong>ev<strong>el</strong>s at the national lev<strong>el</strong> and in all eight provinces most probably contributed to the overall drop inchildhood mortality in K<strong>en</strong>ya (see Chapter 10). Another important initiative is the improvem<strong>en</strong>t inkey malaria indicators such as ownership and use of treated mosquito nets, prev<strong>en</strong>tive treatm<strong>en</strong>t ofmalaria during pregnancy, and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of childhood fever, giv<strong>en</strong> that malaria is one of the leadingcauses of death among young childr<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya and most of sub-Saharan Africa (Division of MalariaControl, 2009).104 | Infant and Child Mortality


8.2 DATA QUALITYThe quality of mortality estimates calculated from retrospective birth histories dep<strong>en</strong>ds uponthe complet<strong>en</strong>ess with which births and deaths are reported and recorded. One factor that affectschildhood mortality estimates is the quality of the reporting of age at death, which may distort the agepattern of mortality. If age at death is misreported, it will bias the estimates, especially if the net effectof the age misreporting results in transfer<strong>en</strong>ce from one age bracket to another. For example, a nettransfer of deaths from under one month to a higher age range will affect the estimates of neonatal andpostneonatal mortality. To minimize errors in reporting of age at death, interviewers were instructedto record age at death in days if the death took place in the month following the birth, in months if thechild died before age two, and in years if the child was at least two years of age. They also were askedto probe for deaths reported at one year to determine a more precise age at death in terms of months.Displacem<strong>en</strong>t of birth dates, which may cause a distortion of mortality tr<strong>en</strong>ds, is a pot<strong>en</strong>tialdata quality problem. This can occur if an interviewer knowingly records a death as occurring in adiffer<strong>en</strong>t year; this could happ<strong>en</strong> if an interviewer were trying to cut down on his or her overallworkload because live births occurring during the five years preceding the interview are the subject ofa l<strong>en</strong>gthy set of additional questions. In the 2008-09 KDHS questionnaire, the cut-off year for askingthese questions was 2003, that is, for births since January 2003. For misreporting of childr<strong>en</strong>’s birthdates, the results are shown in App<strong>en</strong>dix Table C.4. The cal<strong>en</strong>dar year ratios for living and deceasedchildr<strong>en</strong> are 86 and 62, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y, for 2003, compared with 132 and 157, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y, in 2002. Thissuggests misreporting of dates of births for both living and deceased childr<strong>en</strong>. This pattern has be<strong>en</strong>observed in previous KDHS surveys and could be due to some research assistants transferring birthsdates out of the five-year refer<strong>en</strong>ce period to reduce their workloads as discussed.Another pot<strong>en</strong>tial data quality problem is the s<strong>el</strong>ective omission from the birth histories of therecord of births of infants who did not survive, which can lead to underestimation of mortality rates.Wh<strong>en</strong> s<strong>el</strong>ective omission of childhood deaths occurs, it is usually most pronounced for deathsoccurring early in infancy. One way such omissions can be detected is by examining the proportion ofneonatal deaths to infant deaths. G<strong>en</strong>erally, if there is substantial underreporting of deaths, the resultis an abnormally low ratio of neonatal deaths to infant deaths.Evid<strong>en</strong>ce from the 2008-09 KDHS data does not show any sign of severe underreporting ofearly neonatal deaths. For the five-year period before the survey, the proportion of neonatal deathsoccurring in the first week of life is quite high—82 perc<strong>en</strong>t (App<strong>en</strong>dix Table C.5) 1 , the same asrecorded in 2003. Moreover, except for the period 10-14 years preceding the survey, this ratio isapproximat<strong>el</strong>y stable over the 20 years preceding the survey, a further indication that early infantdeaths have not be<strong>en</strong> grossly underreported.App<strong>en</strong>dix C.6 shows similar data regarding the proportion of infant deaths that occur in thefirst month of life. For the five years before the survey, the ratio of neonatal deaths is withinacceptable lev<strong>el</strong>s (61 perc<strong>en</strong>t). This rate is much higher than the rates recorded in either the 2003KDHS (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) or the 1998 KDHS (41 perc<strong>en</strong>t), an indication that underreporting of deaths wasminimal. This high perc<strong>en</strong>tage of neonatal deaths implies that there was little if any s<strong>el</strong>ective omissionof childhood deaths that could compromise the quality of the 2008-09 KDHS early childhoodmortality rates.1 There are no mod<strong>el</strong>s for mortality patterns during the neonatal period. However, one review of data fromseveral dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries concluded that, at neonatal mortality lev<strong>el</strong>s of 20 per 1,000 or higher,approximat<strong>el</strong>y 70 perc<strong>en</strong>t of neonatal deaths occur within the first six days of life (Boerma, 1988).Infant and Child Mortality | 105


8.3 SOCIOECONOMIC DIFFERENTIALS IN INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITYMortality differ<strong>en</strong>tials by place of resid<strong>en</strong>ce, region, educational lev<strong>el</strong> of the mother, andhousehold wealth are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 8.2. To capture a suffici<strong>en</strong>t number of births to studymortality differ<strong>en</strong>tials across subgroups of the population rates are pres<strong>en</strong>ted for the 10-year periodpreceding the survey (approximat<strong>el</strong>y 1999-2008). A number of socioeconomic, <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>tal, andbiological factors influ<strong>en</strong>ce infant and child mortality (Mosley and Ch<strong>en</strong>, 1984). These factors operatethrough proximate determinants and are discussed in this section. The factors include place or regionof resid<strong>en</strong>ce, mother’s lev<strong>el</strong> of education, and r<strong>el</strong>ative socioeconomic status.Contrary to results observed in previous demographic surveys, urban-rural differ<strong>en</strong>tials forpostneonatal and infant mortality show a reversed pattern, with mortality in urban areas exceedingthat in rural areas. Infant mortality is 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t higher in urban areas (63 per 1,000) than in rural areas(58 per 1,000). Infant mortality in urban areas remained at the same lev<strong>el</strong> as that recorded in the 2003KDHS; however, infant mortality in rural areas dropped by 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t from 79 deaths per 1,000 livebirths in the 2003 KDHS to 58 deaths per 1,000 live births in the 2008-09 KDHS.Variations in early childhood mortality exist across the provinces, with Nyanza provincehaving the highest lev<strong>el</strong>s of both under-five and infant mortality rates (Figure 8.2). Almost one insev<strong>en</strong> childr<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza dies before attaining his or her fifth birthday (149 deaths per 1,000),compared with one in 20 childr<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province (51 deaths per 1,000), which has the lowestrate. Thus, the risk of dying before age five is almost three times higher in Nyanza than in C<strong>en</strong>tralprovince. Infant mortality is also highest in Nyanza province (95 deaths per 1,000) and lowest inEastern province (39 deaths per 1,000). However, it is important to note the considerable declines inchild mortality rates in Nyanza province over the past five years. For example, under-five mortalityhas declined from 206 to 149 deaths per 1,000 births since the 2003 KDHS. There also appears tohave be<strong>en</strong> a dramatic drop in child mortality rates for North Eastern province, though the rates aresubject to rather large confid<strong>en</strong>ce intervals (see Table B.12).Childhood mortality rates from the 2008-09 KDHS for Eastern province are comparable withthose from the 2007 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). The under-five mortality rate basedon MICS was estimated at 54 deaths per 1,000 live births, which is comparable to the rate of 52 fromthe 2008-09 KDHS. Similarly, the infant mortality rate of 40 deaths per 1,000 live births based on the2007 MICS in Eastern province is almost id<strong>en</strong>tical to the 2008-09 KDHS estimate of 39 deaths per1,000 live births.A mother’s education can exert a positive influ<strong>en</strong>ce on childr<strong>en</strong>’s health and survival. Underfivemortality is noticeably lower for childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers either completed primary school (68deaths per 1,000 live births) or att<strong>en</strong>ded secondary school (59 deaths per 1,000 live births) thanamong those whose mothers have no education (86 deaths per 1,000 live births). However, under-fivemortality is highest among childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have incomplete primary education. Similarpatterns are observed for infant mortality lev<strong>el</strong>s. Child mortality rates g<strong>en</strong>erally decline as the wealthquintile increases, though the pattern is not uniform.106 | Infant and Child Mortality


Table 8.2 Early childhood mortality rates by socioeconomic characteristicsNeonatal, postneonatal, infant, child, and under-five mortality rates for the 10-year periodpreceding the survey, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicsNeonatalmortality(NN)Postneonatalmortality(PNN) 1Infantmortality( 1 q 0 )Childmortality( 4 q 1 )Under-fivemortality( 5 q 0 )Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 32 31 63 12 74Rural 33 25 58 29 86ProvinceNairobi 48 12 60 4 64C<strong>en</strong>tral 31 11 42 10 51Coast 44 27 71 18 87Eastern 31 8 39 14 52Nyanza 39 56 95 60 149Rift Valley 30 18 48 12 59Western 24 41 65 60 121North Eastern 33 24 57 24 80Mother’s educationNo education 39 25 64 23 86Primary incomplete 39 34 73 42 112Primary complete 25 26 51 18 68Secondary+ 31 14 45 14 59Wealth quintileLowest 39 26 66 34 98Second 33 31 64 40 102Middle 41 27 67 26 92Fourth 21 18 39 12 51Highest 29 28 57 13 681Computed as the differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> the infant and neonatal mortality ratesFigure 8.2 Under-Five Mortality by Background CharacteristicsK<strong>en</strong>yaResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrbanRural747486ProvinceNairobiC<strong>en</strong>tralCoastEasternNyanzaRift ValleyWesternNorth Eastern515259648087121149EducationNo educationPrimary incompletePrimary completeSecondary+5968861120 25 50 75 100 125 150Deaths per 1,000 live birthsK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Infant and Child Mortality | 107


8.4 DEMOGRAPHIC DIFFERENTIALS IN INFANT AND CHILD MORTALITYThe demographic characteristics of both mother and child have be<strong>en</strong> found to play animportant role in the survival of childr<strong>en</strong>. Table 8.3 pres<strong>en</strong>ts early childhood mortality rates bydemographic characteristics (i.e., sex of child, mother’s age at birth, birth order, previous birthinterval, and birth size). As was the case with the socioeconomic differ<strong>en</strong>tials, these are some of theproximate determinants that directly affect infant and childhood mortality. Rates are pres<strong>en</strong>ted for the10-year period preceding the survey.Table 8.3 Early childhood mortality rates by demographic characteristicsNeonatal, postneonatal, infant, child, and under-five mortality rates for the 10-year periodpreceding the survey, by demographic characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09DemographiccharacteristicNeonatalmortality(NN)Postneonatalmortality(PNN) 1Infantmortality( 1 q 0 )Childmortality( 4 q 1 )Under-fivemortality( 5 q 0 )Child’s sexMale 38 27 65 27 90Female 28 26 53 25 77Mother’s age at birth


The l<strong>en</strong>gth of birth interval has a significant impact on a child’s chances of survival, withshort birth intervals considerably reducing the chances of survival. Childr<strong>en</strong> born fewer than twoyears after a prior sibling suffer substantially higher risks of death than childr<strong>en</strong> with intervals of twoor more years. For example, the under-five mortality rate is 130 deaths per 1,000 live births forchildr<strong>en</strong> born after an interval of less than 2 years compared with a rate of 78 deaths per 1,000 livebirths for birth intervals of 4 or more years.Size of the child at birth also has a bearing on the childhood mortality rates. Childr<strong>en</strong> whosebirth size is small or very small have a 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t greater risk of dying before their first birthday thanthose whose birth size is average or larger.8.5 PERINATAL MORTALITYPerinatal mortality is a goodindicator of the state of health in g<strong>en</strong>eraland the health status of the mother at thetime of d<strong>el</strong>ivery. Pregnancy lossesoccurring after sev<strong>en</strong> completed monthsof gestation (stillbirths) plus deaths to livebirths within the first sev<strong>en</strong> days of life(early neonatal deaths) constitute perinataldeaths. The distinction betwe<strong>en</strong> a stillbirthand an early neonatal death may be a fineone, oft<strong>en</strong> dep<strong>en</strong>ding on observing andth<strong>en</strong> remembering sometimes faint signsof life after d<strong>el</strong>ivery. The causes ofstillbirths and early neonatal deaths areclos<strong>el</strong>y linked, and examining just one orthe other can understate the true lev<strong>el</strong> ofmortality at or near the time of d<strong>el</strong>ivery.For this reason, deaths around d<strong>el</strong>ivery arecombined into the perinatal mortality rate,defined as the number of perinatal deathsper 1,000 pregnancies reaching sev<strong>en</strong>months of gestation.Table 8.4 pres<strong>en</strong>ts the number ofstillbirths and early neonatal deaths andthe perinatal mortality rates for the fiveyearperiod preceding the 2008-09 KDHS.Results show that of the 5,920 reportedpregnancies of 7+ months’ duration, 68<strong>en</strong>ded in stillbirths and 149 were neonataldeaths, thus giving a perinatal mortalityrate of 37 deaths per 1,000 pregnancies, amarginal decline from the 40 deaths per1,000 pregnancies recorded in the 2003KDHS.The highest perinatal mortalityrisk is experi<strong>en</strong>ced among mothers age30-39 years (43 deaths per 1,000pregnancies) wh<strong>en</strong> compared withTable 8.4 Perinatal mortalityNumber of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths, and the perinatal mortalityrate for the five-year period preceding the survey, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicNumber ofstillbirths 1Number ofearlyneonataldeaths 2Perinatalmortalityrate 3Number ofpregnancies of7+ monthsdurationMother’s age at birth


8.6 HIGH-RISK FERTILITYBEHAVIOURNumerous studies have founda strong r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong>childr<strong>en</strong>’s chances of dying andcertain fertility behaviours. Typically,the probability of dying in earlychildhood is much greater if childr<strong>en</strong>are born to mothers who are tooyoung or too old, if they are born aftera short birth interval, or if they areborn to mothers with high parity. Veryyoung mothers may experi<strong>en</strong>cedifficult pregnancies and d<strong>el</strong>iveriesbecause of their physical immaturity.Older wom<strong>en</strong> may also experi<strong>en</strong>ceage-r<strong>el</strong>ated problems duringpregnancy and d<strong>el</strong>ivery. For purposesof this analysis a mother is classifiedas ‘too young’ if she is less than 18years of age and ‘too old’ if she isover 34 years of age at the time ofd<strong>el</strong>ivery; a ‘short birth interval’ isdefined as a birth occurring within 24months of a previous birth; and a‘high-order’ birth is one occurringafter three or more previous births(i.e. birth order 4 or higher). For theshort birth interval category, onlychildr<strong>en</strong> with a preceding interval ofless than 24 months are included.Short succeeding birth intervals ar<strong>en</strong>ot included, ev<strong>en</strong> though they caninflu<strong>en</strong>ce the survivorship of a child,because of the problem of reversecausal effect (i.e., a short succeedingTable 8.5 High-risk fertility behaviourPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of childr<strong>en</strong> born in the five years preceding the survey bycategory of <strong>el</strong>evated risk of mortality and the risk ratio, and perc<strong>en</strong>tdistribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> by category of risk if they were toconceive a child at the time of the survey, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Risk categoryBirths in the 5 yearspreceding the surveyPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof birthsPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarriedwom<strong>en</strong> 1birth interval can be the result of the death of a child rather than being the cause of the death of achild).Table 8.5 shows the distribution of childr<strong>en</strong> born in the five years preceding the survey byrisk category. Although first births to wom<strong>en</strong> age 18-34 are considered an unavoidable risk, they areincluded in the analysis and are shown as a separate risk category. Column one shows that only 28perc<strong>en</strong>t or slightly more than one-quarter of childr<strong>en</strong> born in K<strong>en</strong>ya were not in any high-riskcategory. A further 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births are first births to mothers age 18-34 years—considered anunavoidable risk category. The remaining 55 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births are in at least one of the specifiedavoidable high-risk categories; 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births fall in the single high-risk category (with births oforder 3 and above being the most common single high-risk category—21 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofbirths are in multiple high-risk categories. In the latter category, births to mothers older than 34 yearsand of birth order 3 and higher comprise the most common multiple high-risk category with 9 perc<strong>en</strong>tof births. Thus, only one in four births in K<strong>en</strong>ya falls in a low-risk mortality category, and themajority of births (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t) fall in an avoidable high-risk mortality category.RiskratioNot in any high-risk category 28.3 1.00 24.6 aUnavoidable risk categoryFirst order births betwe<strong>en</strong> ages 18and 34 years 16.9 1.02 4.3Single high-risk categoryMother’s age 34 0.8 2.07 4.2Birth interval 3 21.7 1.20 17.2Subtotal 36.3 1.44 30.0Multiple high-risk categoryAge 3 8.9 1.22 25.3Age >34 & birth interval 3 1.6 4.45 3.7Birth interval 3 7.4 1.22 11.8Subtotal 18.5 1.52 41.1In any avoidable high-risk category 54.8 1.47 71.0Total 100.0 na 100.0Number of births/wom<strong>en</strong> 5,852 na 4,928Note: Risk ratio is the ratio of the proportion dead among births in a specifichigh-risk category to the proportion dead among births not in any high-riskcategory. Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted births inthe d<strong>en</strong>ominator of the ratio; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewerthan 25 unweighted births that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicable1Wom<strong>en</strong> are assigned to risk categories according to the status they wouldhave at the birth of a child if they were to conceive at the time of the survey:curr<strong>en</strong>t age less than 17 years and 3 months or older than 34 years and 2months, latest birth less than 15 months ago, or latest birth being of order 3or higher.2Includes the category age 3a Includes sterilized wom<strong>en</strong>110 | Infant and Child Mortality


The last column in Table 8.5 looks to the future and addresses the question of how manycurr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> have the pot<strong>en</strong>tial for having a high-risk birth. The results were obtained bysimulating the risk category into which a birth to a curr<strong>en</strong>tly married woman would fall if she were tobecome pregnant at the time of the survey. This column therefore provides an insight into themagnitude of high-risk births in K<strong>en</strong>ya at the time of the survey. Overall, 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> have the pot<strong>en</strong>tial for having a high-risk birth, with 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t falling into a singlehigh-risk category and 41 perc<strong>en</strong>t falling into a multiple high-risk category.Infant and Child Mortality | 111


MATERNAL HEALTH 9B<strong>en</strong> Obonyo, Andolo Miheso, and Annah WamaeThe health care that a mother receives during pregnancy, at the time of d<strong>el</strong>ivery, and soonafter d<strong>el</strong>ivery is important for the survival and w<strong>el</strong>l-being of both the mother and her child. Thischapter pres<strong>en</strong>ts new findings in these areas of importance to maternal health and also addressesproblems in access to health care. These findings are important to those who formulate policies andprogrammes and also to those who design appropriate strategies and interv<strong>en</strong>tions to improvematernal and child health care services.9.1 ANTENATAL CAREInformation on ant<strong>en</strong>atal care is of great value in id<strong>en</strong>tifying subgroups of wom<strong>en</strong> who do notutilise such services and in planning improvem<strong>en</strong>ts to these services. The data on ant<strong>en</strong>atal care fromthe 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) provide details on the type of serviceprovider, the number of ant<strong>en</strong>atal visits made, the stage of pregnancy at the time of the first and lastvisits, and the services and information provided during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, including whether tetanustoxoid was received.9.1.1 Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care CoverageThe major objective of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care during pregnancy is to id<strong>en</strong>tify and treat problems suchas anaemia and infection. It is during an ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visit that scre<strong>en</strong>ing for complications occursand advice is giv<strong>en</strong> on a range of issues, including place of d<strong>el</strong>ivery and referral of mothers. In the2008-09 KDHS, interviewers asked each woman to give the source of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care she may havereceived for her most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth and the name of the person who provided that care. If a womanreceived ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from more than one provider, the provider with the highest lev<strong>el</strong> ofqualifications was recorded. Table 9.1 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> who had a live birthin the five years preceding the survey, categorized by the type of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care provider and bybackground characteristics.The results in Table 9.1 indicate that 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal carefrom a medical professional, either from doctors (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t), or nurses and midwives (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Avery small fraction (less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t) receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from traditional birth att<strong>en</strong>dants, and7 perc<strong>en</strong>t do not receive any ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at all.The 2008-09 data indicate a rise since 2003 in medical ant<strong>en</strong>atal care coverage (Figure 9.1).Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in use of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care show that the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who had ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from atrained medical provider for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth in the five years before the survey rose slightly,from 88 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the curr<strong>en</strong>t survey. Moreover, there has be<strong>en</strong> a shift awayfrom use of nurses and midwives (70 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 down to 63 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09) towards doctors(18 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 and up to 29 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09).Maternal Health | 113


Table 9.1 Ant<strong>en</strong>atal carePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had a live birth in the five years preceding the survey, by ant<strong>en</strong>atal care providerduring pregnancy, for the most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth and by perc<strong>en</strong>tage receiving ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from a skilled provider 1 for the most rec<strong>en</strong>tbirth, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicDoctorNurse/midwifeCommunityhealthworkerTraditionalbirthatt<strong>en</strong>dant Other No one Missing TotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tagereceivingant<strong>en</strong>atalcare from askilledproviderNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Mother’s age at birth


Examination of differ<strong>en</strong>tials in ant<strong>en</strong>atal care in Table 9.1 shows that the mother’s age at birthand the child’s birth order are not strongly r<strong>el</strong>ated to use of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, except that high-paritywom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than low-parity wom<strong>en</strong> not to see anyone for ant<strong>en</strong>atal care. Rural wom<strong>en</strong> ar<strong>el</strong>ess lik<strong>el</strong>y than their urban counterparts to get ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from a doctor, and they are more lik<strong>el</strong>y toget no care at all. There are marked regional variations in ant<strong>en</strong>eatal care coverage, with over onequarterof wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province not getting any ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at all. Wom<strong>en</strong> in Westernand Nyanza provinces have low use of doctors for ant<strong>en</strong>atal care compared with their use of nurses,while for Coast and C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces the reverse is true.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s lev<strong>el</strong> of education is associated with ant<strong>en</strong>atal care coverage. Wom<strong>en</strong> with highereducation are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from a medical doctor than are those with noeducation (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t versus 21 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who get no ant<strong>en</strong>atal care declinessteadily as education increases. One-quarter of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education get no ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at all.Similarly, the higher the wealth quintile, the more lik<strong>el</strong>y a woman is to get ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from adoctor. One in sev<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintile does not get any ant<strong>en</strong>atal care.9.1.2 Source of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal CareTable 9.2 shows the types of places where wom<strong>en</strong> say they obtain ant<strong>en</strong>atal care. Becausewom<strong>en</strong> can obtain care from several sources, multiple answers were allowed. The vast majority ofwom<strong>en</strong> who obtain ant<strong>en</strong>atal care go to governm<strong>en</strong>t sources (83 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Use of private medicalsources was reported by only 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>. The most common sources of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care aregovernm<strong>en</strong>t hospitals and governm<strong>en</strong>t disp<strong>en</strong>saries.Table 9.2 Source of ant<strong>en</strong>atal careAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had a live birth in the five years preceding the survey and who received ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for the most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth,perc<strong>en</strong>tage who received ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at specific types of facilities, according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce and province, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Source(s) ofant<strong>en</strong>atal careResid<strong>en</strong>ceRegionUrban Rural Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern NyanzaRiftValleyWesternNorthEasternHome 0.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.4 2.3 4.6 2.6 1.4Governm<strong>en</strong>t sector 76.0 85.0 61.9 81.8 90.8 85.6 86.3 83.4 78.8 97.0 83.0Governm<strong>en</strong>t hospital 45.5 24.8 28.2 34.5 36.5 23.2 39.7 24.0 23.1 34.0 29.3Governm<strong>en</strong>t health c<strong>en</strong>tre 20.4 28.0 26.4 21.6 28.5 32.3 28.4 19.5 36.7 6.4 26.4Governm<strong>en</strong>t disp<strong>en</strong>sary 10.5 32.8 7.5 26.2 28.1 31.0 19.4 40.0 19.2 53.4 28.0Other public 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.1 3.7 0.4Private medical sector 25.0 14.0 40.2 19.0 9.6 15.0 13.7 14.2 18.7 0.5 16.4Mission hospital/clinic 7.0 7.4 10.8 11.2 1.6 6.7 3.7 9.0 10.0 0.0 7.3Private hospital/clinic 16.9 6.1 27.1 7.2 7.9 8.2 9.5 4.6 7.5 0.5 8.5Nursing/ maternity home 1.0 0.4 2.3 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.5Other 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.7Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 798 2,882 260 348 312 591 695 990 416 68 3,680TotalThe public-private distribution of sources for ant<strong>en</strong>atal care differs for urban and ruralwom<strong>en</strong>; urban wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to go to governm<strong>en</strong>t hospitals and private hospitals and clinicsthan are rural wom<strong>en</strong>, who are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to visit governm<strong>en</strong>t disp<strong>en</strong>saries and health c<strong>en</strong>tres.Wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi use private sources more than wom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces, and wom<strong>en</strong> in NorthEastern and Coast provinces are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to visit public (governm<strong>en</strong>t) sources for ant<strong>en</strong>atal care.Five perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in Western province reported having received ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at home. Theproportion of wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province receiving ant<strong>en</strong>atal care at home declined from 22perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Maternal Health | 115


9.1.3 Number and Timing of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care VisitsAnt<strong>en</strong>atal care is more b<strong>en</strong>eficial in prev<strong>en</strong>ting adverse pregnancy outcomes wh<strong>en</strong> it is soughtearly in the pregnancy and is continued through d<strong>el</strong>ivery. Early detection of problems in pregnancyleads to more tim<strong>el</strong>y referrals in the case of wom<strong>en</strong> in high-risk categories or with complications; thisis particularly true in K<strong>en</strong>ya, where three-quarters of the population lives in rural areas and wherephysical barriers pose a chall<strong>en</strong>ge to health care d<strong>el</strong>ivery. Health professionals recomm<strong>en</strong>d that thefirst ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit occur within the first three months of pregnancy, that subsequ<strong>en</strong>t visits continue ona monthly basis through the 28th week of pregnancy, and that visits thereafter take place every twoweeks up to the 36th week (or until birth). Under normal circumstances, WHO recomm<strong>en</strong>ds that awoman without complications should have at least four ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits, the first of which shouldtake place during the first trimester. Table 9.3 pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on the number of visits and thetiming of the first visit.In K<strong>en</strong>ya, less than half (47perc<strong>en</strong>t) of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> make four ormore ant<strong>en</strong>atal visits. Sixty perc<strong>en</strong>t ofurban wom<strong>en</strong> make four or more ant<strong>en</strong>atalcare visits, compared with less than half ofrural wom<strong>en</strong> (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Moreover, most wom<strong>en</strong> do notreceive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care early in thepregnancy. Only 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>obtain ant<strong>en</strong>atal care in the first trimester ofpregnancy, and only about half (52 perc<strong>en</strong>t)receive care before the sixth month ofpregnancy. Overall, the median number ofmonths of pregnancy at first visit is 5.7.Comparing tr<strong>en</strong>ds since the 2003KDHS, the analysis shows a continuingdecline in the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> whomake four or more ant<strong>en</strong>atal visits, from 52perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 47 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.This decline should translate to a call forprogramme interv<strong>en</strong>tions that will<strong>en</strong>courage more wom<strong>en</strong> to have regularant<strong>en</strong>atal visits throughout the pregnancy.Overall, there has be<strong>en</strong> only a slightimprovem<strong>en</strong>t in the pattern of ant<strong>en</strong>atal att<strong>en</strong>dance by gestational age. The median gestational age atfirst visit has decreased slightly, from 5.9 months in the 2003 KDHS to 5.7 months in the 2008-09survey.9.1.4 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal CareTable 9.3 Number of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits and timing of first visitPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had a live birth in thefive years preceding the survey by number of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits forthe most rec<strong>en</strong>t live birth, byby the timing of the first visit, and amongwom<strong>en</strong> with ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, median months pregnant at first visit,according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Number and timingof ant<strong>en</strong>atal visitsResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban RuralMeasuring the cont<strong>en</strong>t of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care is ess<strong>en</strong>tial for assessing the quality of ant<strong>en</strong>atal careservices. Pregnancy complications are a primary source of maternal and child morbidity andmortality. Therefore, pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> should routin<strong>el</strong>y receive information on the signs ofcomplications and be tested for them at all ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits. To h<strong>el</strong>p assess the quality of ant<strong>en</strong>atalservices, respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked whether they had be<strong>en</strong> advised of complications or received certainscre<strong>en</strong>ing tests during at least one of their ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits. Table 9.4 pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on theperc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who took iron tablets or syrup, who took medicine for intestinal parasites, whowere informed of the signs of pregnancy complications, and who received s<strong>el</strong>ected services duringant<strong>en</strong>atal care visits for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth in the last five years.TotalNumber of ant<strong>en</strong>atal visitsNone 3.0 8.4 7.31 3.6 4.5 4.32-3 29.8 41.7 39.24+ 59.9 43.8 47.1Don’t know/missing 3.7 1.6 2.0Total 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of months pregnantat time of first ant<strong>en</strong>atal visitNo ant<strong>en</strong>atal care 3.0 8.4 7.3


Table 9.4 shows that two-thirds of wom<strong>en</strong> with a live birth in the last five years took irontablets or syrup during the pregnancy of their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth. In comparison, only 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t tookdrugs for intestinal parasites. Wom<strong>en</strong> residing in urban areas and those with a higher lev<strong>el</strong> ofeducation are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to take iron supplem<strong>en</strong>ts than rural and less educated wom<strong>en</strong>. Wom<strong>en</strong> inCoast province are the most lik<strong>el</strong>y and those in North Eastern province are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to take irontablets or syrup. G<strong>en</strong>erally, the higher the wealth quintile, the more lik<strong>el</strong>y a woman is to take ironsupplem<strong>en</strong>ts during pregnancy. These patterns are similar for wom<strong>en</strong> who take drugs to <strong>el</strong>iminateintestinal parasites.Table 9.4 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of ant<strong>en</strong>atal careAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took iron tablets or syrup and drugs forintestinal parasites during the pregnancy of the most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth, and among wom<strong>en</strong> receiving ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for the most rec<strong>en</strong>t live birth in thefive years preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage receiving specific ant<strong>en</strong>atal services, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong wom<strong>en</strong> with a livebirth in the last five years, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage who during thepregnancy of their last birth:Took irontablets orsyrupTookintestinalparasitedrugsNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>with a livebirth inthe lastfive yearsAmong wom<strong>en</strong> who received ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth in the last fiveyears, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who received s<strong>el</strong>ected services:Informedof signs ofpregnancycomplicationsWeighedHeightmeasuredBloodpressuremeasuredUrinesampletak<strong>en</strong>Bloodsampletak<strong>en</strong>Giv<strong>en</strong>informationonbreastfeedingNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>withant<strong>en</strong>atalcare fortheir mostrec<strong>en</strong>tbirthMother’s age at birth


Among wom<strong>en</strong> receiving ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, 94 perc<strong>en</strong>t said they were weighed, 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t hadtheir height measured, and 85 perc<strong>en</strong>t had their blood pressure measured (Figure 9.2). Two-thirds ofwom<strong>en</strong> had a urine sample tak<strong>en</strong>, and 82 perc<strong>en</strong>t had a blood sample tak<strong>en</strong>. Fifty-three perc<strong>en</strong>t ofpregnant wom<strong>en</strong> said they were giv<strong>en</strong> information on breastfeeding.Figure 9.2 Compon<strong>en</strong>ts of Ant<strong>en</strong>atal Care100Perc<strong>en</strong>t948069856882605343403120170Took irontabletsor syrupTookintestinalparasitedrugsInformed ofsigns ofpregnancycomplicationsWeighedHeightmeasuredBloodpressuremeasuredUrinesampletak<strong>en</strong>Bloodsampletak<strong>en</strong>Giv<strong>en</strong>informationon breastfeedingK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Socioeconomic characteristics that are r<strong>el</strong>ated to obtaining quality ant<strong>en</strong>atal care includeresid<strong>en</strong>ce, lev<strong>el</strong> of education, and wealth. Wom<strong>en</strong> receiving ant<strong>en</strong>atal care in urban areas are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than rural wom<strong>en</strong> to receive all the specified compon<strong>en</strong>ts of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care. Similarly, wom<strong>en</strong>with more education and those higher on the wealth index are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive most of thecompon<strong>en</strong>ts of ant<strong>en</strong>atal care than are less educated and poorer wom<strong>en</strong>. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobiwho receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care are the most lik<strong>el</strong>y and those in North Eastern province are the least lik<strong>el</strong>yto receive the stated services. The only exception is height measurem<strong>en</strong>t, which pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> inEastern province who receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive.9.2 TETANUS TOXOID INJECTIONSNeonatal tetanus is a leading cause of neonatal deaths in dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries where a highproportion of d<strong>el</strong>iveries are conducted at home or in places where hygi<strong>en</strong>ic conditions do not exist.Tetanus toxoid (TT) immunisation is giv<strong>en</strong> to pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> to prev<strong>en</strong>t neonatal tetanus. If awoman has received no previous TT injections, she needs two doses of TT during pregnancy for fullprotection. However, if a woman was immunised before she became pregnant, she may require oneinjection or not require any TT injections during pregnancy, dep<strong>en</strong>ding on the number of injectionsshe has already received and the timing of the last injection. For a woman to have lifetime protection,a total of five doses are required.The 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya DHS collected data on whether or not wom<strong>en</strong> received at least two TTinjections during pregnancy and whether or not births are protected against neonatal tetanus. Theseresults are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 9.5 for wom<strong>en</strong>’s most rec<strong>en</strong>t live birth in the five years preceding thesurvey.118 | Maternal Health


Table 9.5 shows that 55 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofmothers receive two or more doses oftetanus toxoid during pregnancy. Motherswith lower parity and those residing inurban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive twoTT injections than those with higher parityand those residing in rural areas. Similarly,wealthy and highly educated wom<strong>en</strong> aremore lik<strong>el</strong>y than poor and less educatedwom<strong>en</strong> to receive two injections duringpregnancy. Coverage with at least twodoses ranges from 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> inboth Rift Valley and Western provinces to70 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in C<strong>en</strong>tral province.Table 9.5 also indicates that 73perc<strong>en</strong>t of rec<strong>en</strong>t births are protectedagainst neonatal tetanus. Births to lesseducated wom<strong>en</strong>—especially those towom<strong>en</strong> with no education—are less lik<strong>el</strong>yto be protected against neonatal tetanusthan those to more educated wom<strong>en</strong>.Coverage against neonatal tetanus rangesfrom 63 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in NorthEastern province to 82 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those inC<strong>en</strong>tral province.There has be<strong>en</strong> little change in theproportion of wom<strong>en</strong> receiving tetanustoxoid injections during pregnancy. Theproportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who received two ormore tetanus injections during thepregnancy that resulted in their most rec<strong>en</strong>tbirth in the five years before the surveyincreased from 52 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 55perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.9.3 PLACE OF DELIVERYIncreasing the proportion of babiesthat are d<strong>el</strong>ivered in health facilities is anTable 9.5 Tetanus toxoid injectionsAmong mothers age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years precedingthe survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage receiving two or more tetanus toxoid (TT)injections during the pregnancy for the last live birth and theperc<strong>en</strong>tage whose last live birth was protected against neonataltetanus, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagereceivingtwo or moreinjections duringlast pregnancyPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewhose last birthwas protectedagainst neonataltetanus 1Numberof mothersMother’s age at birth


There has be<strong>en</strong> some change since 2003 in the proportion of births occurring at home. Birthsat home declined from 59 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09 survey. It is also interesting tonote that while the proportion of births in a public facility increased from 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 32perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09, the proportion of births taking place in private facilities declined from 14 perc<strong>en</strong>tto 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Table 9.6 Place of d<strong>el</strong>iveryPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of live births in the five years preceding the survey by place of d<strong>el</strong>ivery and perc<strong>en</strong>taged<strong>el</strong>ivered in a health facility, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicHealth facilityPublicsectorPrivatesectorHomeEn routeOther/missingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>taged<strong>el</strong>iveredin a healthfacilityNumberof birthsMother’s age at birth


Table 9.7 Reason for not d<strong>el</strong>ivering in a health facilityPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of last live births in the five years preceding the survey not d<strong>el</strong>ivered in a health facility by reason for not d<strong>el</strong>ivering in a healthfacility, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicCost toomuchFacilitynot op<strong>en</strong>Too far/notransportPoorqualityserviceNo femaleproviderHusband/family didnot allowNotnecessaryNotcustomaryAbruptd<strong>el</strong>iveryNumber ofbirths notd<strong>el</strong>iveredin a healthfacilityMother’s age at birth


9.4 ASSISTANCE DURING DELIVERYIn addition to place of birth, assistance during childbirth is an important variable thatinflu<strong>en</strong>ces the birth outcome and the health of the mother and the infant. The skills and performanceof the birth att<strong>en</strong>dant determine whether or not he or she can manage complications and observehygi<strong>en</strong>ic practices. Table 9.8 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of live births in the five years precedingthe survey by the person providing assistance, according to background characteristics. This table alsopres<strong>en</strong>ts data on preval<strong>en</strong>ce of births by caesarean section.Table 9.8 Assistance during d<strong>el</strong>iveryPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of live births in the five years preceding the survey by person providing assistance during d<strong>el</strong>ivery, perc<strong>en</strong>tage of birthsassisted by a skilled provider, and perc<strong>en</strong>tage d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesarean-section, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Person providing assistance during d<strong>el</strong>iveryBackgroundcharacteristicDoctorNurse/midwifeOtherhealthworkerTraditionalbirthatt<strong>en</strong>dantR<strong>el</strong>ative/otherNo oneDon’tknow/missingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>taged<strong>el</strong>iveredby a skilledprovider 1Perc<strong>en</strong>taged<strong>el</strong>iveredbyC-sectionNumberof birthsMother’s age at birth


Maternal age and the child’s birth order are associated with the type of assistance at d<strong>el</strong>ivery.Births to older wom<strong>en</strong> and those of higher birth order are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to occur with no assistance,compared with births to younger wom<strong>en</strong> and those of lower birth order.As expected, births in urban areas and births to mothers who have more education or wealthare more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be assisted by medical personn<strong>el</strong> than are those births to mothers who reside inrural areas or who have less education or wealth. Regional differ<strong>en</strong>tials in type of assistance atd<strong>el</strong>ivery are also pronounced, with Western province recording the lowest proportion (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t) ofbirths assisted by medical professionals, followed by North Eastern province (32 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Nairobi hasthe highest proportion of births assisted by medical personn<strong>el</strong> (89 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Although 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births in North Eastern province are att<strong>en</strong>ded by a skilled provider,only 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t occur in a health facility. North Eastern province is the only province in K<strong>en</strong>ya wherea sizeable proportion of births are att<strong>en</strong>ded by skilled providers at home.The proportion of births assisted by medically trained personn<strong>el</strong> has increased marginally—from 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09 survey (Figure 9.3).Figure 9.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in D<strong>el</strong>ivery CareFacility-based d<strong>el</strong>ivery2003402008-0943Skilled birth att<strong>en</strong>dance2003422008-09440 10 20 30 40 50Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of births in the5 years before the surveyThe 2008-09 KDHS indicates that 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of births in K<strong>en</strong>ya are d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesareansection, slightly higher than the 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded in the 2003 KDHS. Births of lower order and thosein urban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesarean section compared with those of higherorder and those in rural areas. As expected, births to mothers who have more education or who are inwealthier quintiles are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesarean section than those whose mothershave less education or are in poorer wealth quintiles. There are regional differ<strong>en</strong>tials in the proportionof births d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesarean section, with North Eastern province recording the lowest proportion(less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t) followed by Western province (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t). C<strong>en</strong>tral province has the highestproportion of births d<strong>el</strong>ivered by caesarean section (15 perc<strong>en</strong>t).9.5 POSTNATAL CAREA large proportion of maternal and neonatal deaths occur during the first 48 hours afterd<strong>el</strong>ivery. Thus, postnatal care is important for both the mother and the child to treat complicationsarising from the d<strong>el</strong>ivery, as w<strong>el</strong>l as to provide the mother with important information on how to carefor hers<strong>el</strong>f and her child. It is recomm<strong>en</strong>ded that all wom<strong>en</strong> receive a check on their health within twodays of d<strong>el</strong>ivery. To assess the ext<strong>en</strong>t of postnatal care utilisation, respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked whether,for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth in the five years preceding the survey, they had received a health checkafter the d<strong>el</strong>ivery, and if so, the timing of the first check-up and the type of health provider performingit. This information is pres<strong>en</strong>ted according to background characteristics in Tables 9.9 and 9.10.Maternal Health | 123


Table 9.9 Timing of first postnatal checkupAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 giving birth in the five years preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of themother’s first postnatal check-up for the last live birth by time after d<strong>el</strong>ivery, according to backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicLess than4 hoursTime after d<strong>el</strong>ivery ofmother’s first postnatal checkup4-23hours2 days3-41daysDon’tknow/missingNopostnatalcheckup 1TotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Mother’s age at birth


Table 9.10 Type of provider of first postnatal checkupAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 giving birth in the five years preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution bytype of provider of the mother’s first postnatal health check for the last live birth, according tobackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Type of health provider ofmother’s first postnatal checkupBackgroundcharacteristicDoctor/nurse/midwifeCommunityhealthworkerTraditionalbirthatt<strong>en</strong>dantOther/don’tknow/missingNopostnatalcheckup 1TotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Mother’s age at birth


CHILD HEALTH 10B<strong>en</strong> Obonyo, Andolo Miheso, and Annah WamaeOf special importance to child health and survival are birth weight and size, childhoodvaccination status, and treatm<strong>en</strong>t practices for respiratory infection, fever, and diarrhoea. Informationon birth weight and size influ<strong>en</strong>ces the design and implem<strong>en</strong>tation of programs aimed at reducingneonatal and infant mortality.Many deaths in early childhood are prev<strong>en</strong>table if childr<strong>en</strong> are immunized against prev<strong>en</strong>tablediseases and receive prompt and appropriate treatm<strong>en</strong>t wh<strong>en</strong> they become ill. Overall coverage lev<strong>el</strong>sat the time of the survey are shown for childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months. Additionally, the source of thevaccination information, whether based on a writt<strong>en</strong> vaccination card or on the mother’s recall, isdocum<strong>en</strong>ted. Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in vaccination coverage among subgroups of the population will assist inprogram planning.Information on treatm<strong>en</strong>t practices and contact with health services by childr<strong>en</strong> with the threemost important childhood illnesses (acute respiratory infection, fever, and diarrhoea) h<strong>el</strong>p in theassessm<strong>en</strong>t of national programs aimed at reducing the mortality from these illnesses. Informationfrom the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) is provided on the preval<strong>en</strong>ce ofacute respiratory infection (ARI) and its treatm<strong>en</strong>t with antibiotics and the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of fever and itstreatm<strong>en</strong>t with antimalarial drugs and antibiotics. Measuring the ext<strong>en</strong>t of treatm<strong>en</strong>t of diarrhoealdisease with oral rehydration therapy (including increased fluids) aids in the assessm<strong>en</strong>t of programsthat recomm<strong>en</strong>d such treatm<strong>en</strong>t. Because appropriate sanitary practices can h<strong>el</strong>p prev<strong>en</strong>t and reducethe severity of diarrhoeal disease, information is also provided on the manner of disposing ofchildr<strong>en</strong>’s faecal matter.10.1 WEIGHT AND SIZE AT BIRTHA child’s birth weight and size are important indicators of the child’s vulnerability tochildhood illness and chance of survival. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose birth weight is less than 2.5 kilograms andchildr<strong>en</strong> reported to be ‘very small’ or ‘smaller than average’ are considered to have a higher thanaverage risk of early childhood death. For births in the five years preceding the survey, birth weightwas recorded in the questionnaire if available from either a writt<strong>en</strong> record or the mother’s recall.Because birth weight may not be known for many babies, the mother’s estimate of the baby’s size atbirth was also obtained. Ev<strong>en</strong> though it is subjective, the mother’s estimate of the baby’s size can be auseful proxy for the weight of the child. Table 10.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on weight and size at birthaccording to background characteristics.The data in Table 10.1, summarized in the ‘Total’ row at the bottom of the table, show that abirth weight was reported for just under half (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of births. Of those with a birth weight, 94perc<strong>en</strong>t weighed 2.5 kg. or more, and only 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t were of low birth weight—less than 2.5 kg.Among all births in the five years before the survey, a large majority (83 perc<strong>en</strong>t) were considered bytheir mothers to be of average or larger size at birth; 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t were considered smaller than average,and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t were thought to be very small.Child Health | 127


Table 10.1 Child’s weight and size at birthPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of live births in the five years preceding the survey with a reported birth weight, by birth weight; perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all births with areported birth weight; and perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of live births in the five years preceding the survey by mother’s estimate of baby’s size at birth, allaccording to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>t distributionof births by reportedbirth weight 1Less than2.5 kg2.5 kgor moreTotalNumberof birthsPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof all birthswith areportedbirth weightPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of birthsby mother’s estimate of size at birthVerysmallSmallerthanaverageAverageor largerDon’tknow/missingTotalNumberof birthsMother’s age at birth


B and haemophilus influ<strong>en</strong>zae type b (Hib). Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in vaccination coverage among subgroups ofthe population are useful for program planning and targeting resources toward areas most in need.The 2008-09 KDHS collected information on vaccination coverage for all living childr<strong>en</strong> bornin the five years preceding the survey. According to the guid<strong>el</strong>ines dev<strong>el</strong>oped by the World HealthOrganisation and adopted by K<strong>en</strong>ya, childr<strong>en</strong> are considered fully vaccinated wh<strong>en</strong> they have receiveda vaccination against tuberculosis (also known as BCG), three doses each of the DPT-HepB-Hib (alsocalled P<strong>en</strong>taval<strong>en</strong>t) and polio vaccines, and a vaccination against measles. The BCG vaccine isusually giv<strong>en</strong> at birth or at first clinical contact, while DPT-HepB-Hib and polio vaccines requirethree vaccinations at approximat<strong>el</strong>y 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age, and measles should be giv<strong>en</strong> at orsoon after reaching 9 months of age.Information on vaccination coverage was collected in two ways in the KDHS: fromvaccination cards shown to the interviewer and from mothers’ verbal reports. If the cards wereavailable, the interviewer copied the vaccination dates directly onto the questionnaire. Wh<strong>en</strong> therewas no vaccination card for the child or if a vaccine had not be<strong>en</strong> recorded on the card as being giv<strong>en</strong>,the respond<strong>en</strong>t was asked to recall the vaccines giv<strong>en</strong> to her child. Table 10.2 and Figure 10.1 showthe perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months who received the various vaccinations by source ofinformation, that is, from vaccination card or mother’s report. The reason the table is based onchildr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months is because this is the youngest cohort of childr<strong>en</strong> who have reached the ageby which they should be fully vaccinated.Table 10.2 Vaccinations by source of informationPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months who received specific vaccines at any time before the survey, by source of information (vaccination card or mother’sreport) and by perc<strong>en</strong>tage vaccinated by 12 months of age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Source of informationBCGDPT 1 -HepB -HibDPT 2 -HepB -HibDPT 3 -HepB -Hib Polio 0 1 Polio 1 Polio 2 Polio 3 MeaslesAll basicvaccinations2Y<strong>el</strong>lowfeverNovaccinationsVaccinated at any timebefore surveyVaccination card 69.9 69.9 68.9 66.4 51.3 70.1 69.3 66.7 60.8 59.4 3.4 0.0 772Mother’s report 25.8 25.9 24.3 20.0 8.0 26.2 24.8 20.8 24.2 18.0 0.0 3.2 325Either source 95.6 95.8 93.1 86.4 59.3 96.4 94.1 87.5 85.0 77.4 3.4 3.2 1,096Vaccinated by 12 monthsof age 3 95.4 93.8 90.8 84.1 59.3 94.3 91.6 84.1 73.5 65.3 2.4 3.6 1,096Valid dates 96.1 96.8 94.4 89.6 65.2 97.3 95.5 90.3 79.1 74.1 3.9 1.5 772Numberofchildr<strong>en</strong>1Polio 0 is the polio vaccination giv<strong>en</strong> at birth. The data on polio vaccination were adjusted for a lik<strong>el</strong>y misinterpretation of polio 0 and polio 1; for childr<strong>en</strong>whose mothers reported that they received three doses of DPT-Hep B-Hib and polio 0, polio 1, and polio 2, it was assumed that polio 0 was in fact polio 1,polio 1 was polio 2 and polio 2 was polio 3.2BCG, measles and three doses each of DPT and polio vaccine (excluding polio vaccine giv<strong>en</strong> at birth)3For childr<strong>en</strong> whose information was based on the mother’s report, the proportion of vaccinations giv<strong>en</strong> during the first year of life was assumed to be thesame as for childr<strong>en</strong> with a writt<strong>en</strong> record of vaccination.The table shows that 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months are fully vaccinated at any timebefore the survey. Only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> have not received any vaccines. Looking at coverage forspecific vaccines, 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> have received the BCG vaccination, 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t the first DPT-HepB-Hib dose, and 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t the first polio dose (Polio 1). 1 Coverage declines for subsequ<strong>en</strong>tdoses, with 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> receiving the recomm<strong>en</strong>ded three doses of DPT-HepB-Hib and 88perc<strong>en</strong>t receiving all three doses of polio. The decline in coverage lev<strong>el</strong>s reflects dropout rates of 10perc<strong>en</strong>t for DPT-HepB-Hib (P<strong>en</strong>taval<strong>en</strong>t) and 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t for polio. 2 The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> 12- 23months vaccinated against measles is 85 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with 73 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003.1 Data for polio vaccinations were adjusted for a lik<strong>el</strong>y underreporting. It appeared that for some childr<strong>en</strong> whodid not receive polio at birth, interviewers may have mistak<strong>en</strong>ly writt<strong>en</strong> the date polio 1 was giv<strong>en</strong> in the spacefor recording the date of polio 0. To correct for any such errors, the total number of doses of DPT and polio waschecked, since the two vaccines are usually giv<strong>en</strong> at the same time. For childr<strong>en</strong> reported as having received allthree doses of DPT and polio 0, polio 1, and polio 2 only, it was assumed that polio 0 was in fact polio 1, polio 1was in fact polio 2, and polio 2 was in fact polio 3.2 The dropout rate repres<strong>en</strong>ts the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who receive the first dose of a vaccine but do not go on toget the third dose, or Dropout rate = [(Dose1 - Dose3) * 100/Dose1].Child Health | 129


Figure 10.1 Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of Childr<strong>en</strong> Age 12-23 Monthswith Specific Vaccinations1008096 96938696948885.077Perc<strong>en</strong>t60402030BCG DPT 1 -HepB -HibDPT 2 -HepB -HibDPT 3 -HepB -HibPolio1Polio2Polio3MeaslesAllbasicvaccinationsNovaccinationsSpecific vaccinationRefers to vaccinations received at any time before the survey.K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> fully immunised has increased from 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to77 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who have not received any of the recomm<strong>en</strong>dedimmunisations has also declined from 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2003 KDHS to 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09KDHS. Although 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> are fully immunised at any time before the survey, only65 perc<strong>en</strong>t are fully immunised by their first birthday.Table 10.3 pres<strong>en</strong>ts vaccination coverage (according to card information and mothers’reports) among childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics. The table showsthat 70 perc<strong>en</strong>t of mothers of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months pres<strong>en</strong>ted a vaccination card, animprovem<strong>en</strong>t from 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. There is no marked differ<strong>en</strong>ce in vaccination status by sex ofthe child. Birth order, however is r<strong>el</strong>ated to immunisation coverage, with first born childr<strong>en</strong> mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y to be fully vaccinated than those of sixth or higher birth order (84 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with62 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Full vaccination coverage among urban childr<strong>en</strong> (81 perc<strong>en</strong>t) is somewhathigher than among rural childr<strong>en</strong> (76 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Provincial variation in vaccination coverage needs to be interpreted with caution because th<strong>en</strong>umbers of observation on which the estimates are based are, in some cases, small. However, someimportant differ<strong>en</strong>ces are appar<strong>en</strong>t. The highest proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> fully vaccinated is in C<strong>en</strong>tralprovince (86 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by Rift Valley province with 85 perc<strong>en</strong>t. North Eastern and Nyanzaprovinces have the lowest proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> fully vaccinated, 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y. There has be<strong>en</strong> an increase in the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province whoare fully immunised, from 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2003 KDHS to 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09 KDHS.Education of the mother is associated with higher chances of their childr<strong>en</strong> having be<strong>en</strong> fullyvaccinated; 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers had at least some secondary education are fullyvaccinated compared with 67 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers had no schooling. Table 10.3 alsoshows a steady increase in the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> fully immunised by wealth quintile, from66 perc<strong>en</strong>t in the lowest quintile to 85 in the highest quintile.130 | Child Health


Table 10.3 Vaccinations by background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months who received specific vaccines at any time before the survey (according to a vaccination card or the mother’sreport), and perc<strong>en</strong>tage with a vaccination card, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicBCGDPT 1 -HepB -HibDPT 2 -HepB -HibDPT 3 -All basicHepB -vaccinationsHib Polio 0 1 Polio 1 Polio 2 Polio 3 Measles2Y<strong>el</strong>lowfeverNovaccinationsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith avaccinationcard se<strong>en</strong>Numberofchildr<strong>en</strong>SexMale 94.6 94.7 91.1 82.9 58.4 95.5 92.7 84.8 84.1 75.3 2.8 4.1 68.8 547Female 96.6 97.0 95.2 89.8 60.2 97.2 95.4 90.2 85.9 79.5 4.0 2.3 72.0 550Birth order1 95.6 97.0 95.0 89.6 68.1 97.0 95.3 90.5 91.8 83.7 4.3 2.8 63.1 2712-3 96.9 97.1 95.4 89.7 61.9 97.9 96.2 90.3 91.2 83.4 3.2 1.7 74.0 3954-5 95.9 95.1 92.0 84.0 53.8 96.1 94.7 86.4 78.1 72.8 3.6 3.4 76.4 2276+ 92.8 92.6 87.7 78.3 48.7 92.9 87.6 79.1 71.6 62.4 2.4 6.5 66.5 204Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 96.2 96.9 94.7 87.7 61.7 97.1 95.6 88.5 90.4 80.9 2.3 2.4 55.3 252Rural 95.4 95.5 92.7 86.0 58.6 96.1 93.6 87.2 83.4 76.3 3.7 3.5 74.9 844ProvinceNairobi 93.8 95.0 88.5 82.2 65.2 94.6 90.2 82.9 87.6 73.1 1.3 3.9 41.8 56C<strong>en</strong>tral 90.7 92.7 92.7 92.2 73.5 92.7 92.7 92.3 88.3 85.8 1.4 7.3 75.6 74Coast 96.5 96.5 95.1 86.7 50.8 96.6 94.8 87.1 85.4 75.8 0.3 3.0 78.0 104Eastern 97.5 97.1 96.4 91.7 76.2 97.3 97.1 91.5 88.7 84.2 3.8 2.5 87.3 157Nyanza 93.0 93.6 88.3 77.0 55.2 95.1 90.7 80.5 78.0 64.6 4.6 4.4 62.2 203Rift Valley 99.2 98.6 97.4 92.9 62.6 98.7 97.1 92.7 89.3 85.0 3.8 0.8 68.7 347Western 93.1 93.9 90.0 81.5 38.3 95.5 93.5 83.5 77.7 73.1 4.3 4.2 75.4 129North Eastern 85.0 85.9 74.4 57.1 31.1 87.2 74.5 65.5 78.9 48.3 4.6 12.8 47.8 27Mother’s educationNo education 93.8 93.8 90.2 81.2 43.3 94.6 89.2 80.6 78.8 67.4 0.8 5.0 76.8 120Primary incomplete 95.4 95.7 90.7 82.7 55.3 95.9 92.5 83.9 80.1 71.2 2.8 3.6 74.7 375Primary complete 95.4 95.5 94.6 87.8 60.8 96.5 95.1 90.6 87.0 80.3 3.7 2.8 71.0 335Secondary+ 97.0 97.4 96.0 92.1 70.2 97.6 97.2 91.6 92.1 87.0 5.0 2.2 60.7 266Wealth quintileLowest 92.8 92.8 88.5 77.3 46.5 93.5 87.7 78.4 75.6 65.9 4.6 6.1 71.6 247Second 97.4 96.7 92.6 86.7 54.0 97.7 95.5 87.5 80.8 74.6 0.8 2.2 74.8 212Middle 95.5 96.0 94.9 91.2 66.4 96.2 96.2 90.3 85.5 80.2 2.6 3.6 79.7 195Fourth 96.1 97.3 96.3 88.8 59.6 98.1 96.4 91.6 89.8 82.5 2.5 1.9 72.0 202Highest 96.5 96.7 94.3 89.6 71.1 96.8 95.6 91.0 93.9 85.1 5.9 2.0 56.4 240Total 95.6 95.8 93.1 86.4 59.3 96.4 94.1 87.5 85.0 77.4 3.4 3.2 70.4 1,0961Polio 0 is the polio vaccination giv<strong>en</strong> at birth. The data on polio vaccination were adjusted for a lik<strong>el</strong>y misinterpretation of polio 0 and polio 1; forchildr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers reported that they received three doses of DPT-Hep B-Hib and polio 0, polio 1, and polio 2, it was assumed that polio 0 was infact polio 1, polio 1 was polio 2 and polio 2 was polio 3.2BCG, measles and three doses each of DPT and polio vaccine (excluding polio vaccine giv<strong>en</strong> at birth)Figure 10.2 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-23 months who are fully vaccinatedaccording to past KDHS surveys in K<strong>en</strong>ya. The graph shows that there was a decline in the proportionof childr<strong>en</strong> fully vaccinated from 79 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1993 to 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 1998 and to a low of 57 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003, followed by a dramatic increase over the past five years to 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. It shouldbe noted that changes in the geographic coverage of the various surveys as w<strong>el</strong>l as the adjustm<strong>en</strong>tmade in the 2003 and 2008-09 surveys make comparisons more difficult to interpret.Child Health | 131


Figure 10.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Childhood Vaccination Coverage100807977Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong>age 12-23 monthsfully vaccinated604065572001993 1998 2003 2008YearRefers to vaccinations received at any time before the survey. Data from 1993 and 1998 omitNorth Eastern province and several other northern districts.K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0910.3 ACUTE RESPIRATORY INFECTIONAcute respiratory infection (ARI) is one of the leading causes of childhood morbidity andmortality throughout the world. Early diagnosis and treatm<strong>en</strong>t with antibiotics can prev<strong>en</strong>t a larg<strong>en</strong>umber of deaths caused by ARI. In the 2008-09 KDHS, the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of ARI was estimated byasking mothers whether their childr<strong>en</strong> under age five had be<strong>en</strong> ill in the two weeks preceding thesurvey with a cough accompanied by short, rapid breathing, which the mother considered to be chestr<strong>el</strong>ated.These symptoms are compatible with pneumonia. It should be noted that the morbidity datacollected are subjective in the s<strong>en</strong>se that they are based on the mother’s perception of illness withoutvalidation by medical personn<strong>el</strong>.Table 10.4 shows that 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years had a cough accompanied byshort, rapid breathing in the two weeks before the survey. Of those childr<strong>en</strong> with these symptoms ofARI, 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t sought advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t from a health facility or a health care provider, animprovem<strong>en</strong>t over the 46 perc<strong>en</strong>t who sought treatm<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. Fifty perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> withsymptoms of ARI received antibiotics.Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of ARI symptoms are not large. However, childr<strong>en</strong> whosemothers smoke cigarettes or other tobacco are far more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have had a cough with short, rapidbreathing (20 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers do not smoke (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t). ARI preval<strong>en</strong>ce is alsolower among childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers use <strong>el</strong>ectricity or gas as cooking fu<strong>el</strong> compared with thosechildr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers use keros<strong>en</strong>e or wood. Preval<strong>en</strong>ce of ARI symptoms among childr<strong>en</strong> isalmost the same in urban and rural areas; however, childr<strong>en</strong> in urban areas who have a coughaccompanied with short, rapid breathing are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tak<strong>en</strong> for medical advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>tthan childr<strong>en</strong> in rural areas (66 and 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Provincial differ<strong>en</strong>tials are minimalexcept for a r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y high preval<strong>en</strong>ce of ARI among childr<strong>en</strong> in Coast province (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t).ARI preval<strong>en</strong>ce is g<strong>en</strong>erally negativ<strong>el</strong>y r<strong>el</strong>ated to education and wealth quintile of the mother,that is, the higher the education or wealth, the lower the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of ARI symptoms. Analysis ofdiffer<strong>en</strong>tials in treatm<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with ARI symptoms is hampered by the small number of cases insome categories.132 | Child Health


Table 10.4 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of symptoms of ARIAmong childr<strong>en</strong> under age five, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) inthe two weeks preceding the survey, and among childr<strong>en</strong> with symptoms of ARI, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage forwhom advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t was sought from a health facility or provider, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreceived antibiotics as treatm<strong>en</strong>t, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicChildr<strong>en</strong> under age fivePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith symptomsof ARI 1Numberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage forwhom advice ortreatm<strong>en</strong>t wassought from ahealth facility orprovider 2Childr<strong>en</strong> under age fivewith symptoms of ARIPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedantibioticsNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age in months


10.4 FEVERFever is a symptom of malaria and other acute infections in childr<strong>en</strong>. Malaria and otherillnesses that cause fever contribute to high lev<strong>el</strong>s of malnutrition and mortality. Although fever canoccur year-round, malaria is more preval<strong>en</strong>t after the <strong>en</strong>d of the rainy season. For this reason,temporal factors must be tak<strong>en</strong> into account wh<strong>en</strong> interpreting fever as an indicator of malariapreval<strong>en</strong>ce. Because malaria is a major contributory cause of death in infancy and childhood in manydev<strong>el</strong>oping countries, the so-called presumptive treatm<strong>en</strong>t of fever with antimalarial medication isadvocated in many countries where malaria is <strong>en</strong>demic. It is important that effective malaria treatm<strong>en</strong>tbe giv<strong>en</strong> promptly to prev<strong>en</strong>t the disease from becoming severe and complicated.In the 2008-09 KDHS, mothers were asked whether their childr<strong>en</strong> under five years had a feverin the two weeks preceding the survey and if so, whether any treatm<strong>en</strong>t was sought. Table 10.5 showsthat 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five were reported to have had fever in the two weeks preceding thesurvey, compared with 41 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. Advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t was sought from a health facility orprovider for 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the childr<strong>en</strong> who had fever in the two weeks preceding the survey. Table10.5 further shows that among childr<strong>en</strong> with fever, 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t took antimalarial drugs, and 36 perc<strong>en</strong>ttook antibiotic drugs.Table 10.5 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of feverAmong childr<strong>en</strong> under age five, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had a fever in the two weeks preceding thesurvey; and among childr<strong>en</strong> with fever, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> for whom treatm<strong>en</strong>t was soughtfrom a health facility or provider, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took antimalarial drugs, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho took antibiotic drugs, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong childr<strong>en</strong>under age five:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewith feverNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Among childr<strong>en</strong> under age five with fever:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagefor whom adviceor treatm<strong>en</strong>twas sought froma health facilityor providerPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookantimalarialdrugsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookantibioticdrugsNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age in months


Fever is least common among childr<strong>en</strong> under 6 months and most common among childr<strong>en</strong>age 6-11 months (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t), after which it decreases with age. Preval<strong>en</strong>ce of fever is similar by sexand resid<strong>en</strong>ce. Regional differ<strong>en</strong>tials show that the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> with fever was highest inCoast province (35 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Western province (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and lowest in Nairobi and Easternprovince (18 perc<strong>en</strong>t). However, among those with fever, childr<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province are more lik<strong>el</strong>yto receive antimalarial drugs (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and antibiotics (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than childr<strong>en</strong> in other provinces.Increasing lev<strong>el</strong>s of education of the mother are associated with decreasing preval<strong>en</strong>ce of fever amongchildr<strong>en</strong> under five years.Malaria is discussed in greater detail in Chapter 12.10.5 DIARRHOEAL DISEASEDehydration caused by severe diarrhoea isa major cause of morbidity and mortality amongyoung childr<strong>en</strong>, although the condition can beeasily treated with oral rehydration therapy(ORT). Exposure to diarrhoea-causing ag<strong>en</strong>ts isfrequ<strong>en</strong>tly r<strong>el</strong>ated to the use of contaminatedwater and to unhygi<strong>en</strong>ic practices in foodpreparation and disposal of excreta. In interpretingthe findings of the 2008-09 KDHS, it should beborne in mind that preval<strong>en</strong>ce of diarrhoea variesseasonally.Table 10.6 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage ofchildr<strong>en</strong> under five with diarrhoea in the twoweeks preceding the survey according to s<strong>el</strong>ectedbackground characteristics. Sev<strong>en</strong>te<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> experi<strong>en</strong>ced diarrhoea in the two weekspreceding the survey, and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t had diarrhoeawith blood. Diarrhoea preval<strong>en</strong>ce increases withage, peaking at 6-11 months (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t), andth<strong>en</strong> falls off.There are only small variations in thepreval<strong>en</strong>ce of diarrhoea by sex, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, andwealth quintile. Nairobi has the lowest preval<strong>en</strong>ceof diarrhoea (12 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Coast province thehighest (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Diarrhoea is less commonamong childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have somesecondary education than among those whosemothers have less education. It is also slightly lesscommon among childr<strong>en</strong> who have an improvedsource of drinking water than among those withan unimproved water source. Diarrhoea is alsoslightly less common among childr<strong>en</strong> who usedimproved, private toilet facilities compared withthose who used nonimproved or shared toiletfacilities.A simple and effective response to achild’s dehydration is to promptly increase intakeof appropriate fluids, possibly in the form ofsolution prepared from oral rehydration saltsTable 10.6 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce of diarrhoeaPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who had diarrhoea inthe two weeks preceding the survey, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicDiarrhoea in the two weekspreceding the surveyAlldiarrhoeaDiarrhoeawithbloodNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age in months


(ORS). In K<strong>en</strong>ya, families are <strong>en</strong>couraged to rehydrate childr<strong>en</strong> with either the commerciallypackaged ORS (also called Oralite) or other fluids prepared at home with locally obtained ingredi<strong>en</strong>ts,for example, water, juices, and soups. ORS solution is usually distributed by health facilities andpharmacies and is also available in local shops and kiosks; preparation of recomm<strong>en</strong>ded homemadefluids also is taught to mothers in health facilities.In the 2008-09 KDHS, mothers of childr<strong>en</strong> who had diarrhoea in the two weeks before thesurvey were asked what was done to treat the illness. Table 10.7 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong>with diarrhoea who received specific treatm<strong>en</strong>ts by background characteristics. Results indicate that49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea in the two weeks preceding the survey were tak<strong>en</strong> to a healthfacility for treatm<strong>en</strong>t. Comparison with data from the 2003 KDHS shows an increase in theperc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea who were tak<strong>en</strong> to a health facility or provider, from 30 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003 to 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008.Table 10.7 Diarrhoea treatm<strong>en</strong>tAmong childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who had diarrhoea in the two weeks preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage for whom advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t was sought from a health facility orprovider, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage giv<strong>en</strong> oral rehydration therapy (ORT), the perc<strong>en</strong>tage giv<strong>en</strong> increased fluids, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage giv<strong>en</strong> ORT or increased fluids, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tagegiv<strong>en</strong> other treatm<strong>en</strong>ts, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage ofchildr<strong>en</strong> withdiarrhoea forwhom advice ortreatm<strong>en</strong>t wassought from ahealth facility orprovider 1 packets fluids fluids fluids fluids drugs drugs m<strong>en</strong>tsOral rehydration therapy (ORT) Other treatm<strong>en</strong>tsEitherORS orHomemadmadehome-ORT or Anti-Anti- ZincORSIncreased increased biotic motilitysupple-Intrav<strong>en</strong>oussolutionHomeremedy/otherNotreatm<strong>en</strong>tAge in months


Overall, 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea are treated with a solution made from ORSpackets, and 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t get homemade fluids, while 72 perc<strong>en</strong>t are giv<strong>en</strong> either ORS or homemadefluids (oral rehydration therapy or ORT). Sev<strong>en</strong>ty-eight perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea are giv<strong>en</strong>ORT or increased fluids.Fourte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea are treated with antibiotic drugs, while 13 perc<strong>en</strong>tare giv<strong>en</strong> no treatm<strong>en</strong>t at all. It is particularly disconcerting to note that, although use of zinc fortreatm<strong>en</strong>t of diarrhoea was introduced in K<strong>en</strong>ya in 2006, less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> withdiarrhoea are giv<strong>en</strong> zinc supplem<strong>en</strong>ts.Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in care-seeking behaviour by background characteristics are not large. However,there is considerable differ<strong>en</strong>ce in care seeking for childr<strong>en</strong> with bloody diarrhoea (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t)compared with those with non-bloody diarrhoea (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among provinces, childr<strong>en</strong> in NorthEastern province who have diarrhoea are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tak<strong>en</strong> for treatm<strong>en</strong>t (68 perc<strong>en</strong>t) thanchildr<strong>en</strong> in other provinces, especially in Western province (31 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in care seekingfor childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea are minimal by lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth quintile of the mother.Mothers are <strong>en</strong>couraged to continue feeding childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea normally and to increasethe amount of fluids. These practices h<strong>el</strong>p to reduce dehydration and minimise the adverseconsequ<strong>en</strong>ces of diarrhoea on the child’s nutritional status. Mothers were asked whether they gave thechild less, the same amount, or more fluids and food than usual wh<strong>en</strong> their child had diarrhoea. Table10.8 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who had diarrhoea in the two weeksbefore the survey, by feeding practices, according to background characteristics.Table 10.8 shows that 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea were giv<strong>en</strong> more to drink thanusual, while 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t were giv<strong>en</strong> the same as usual, 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t were giv<strong>en</strong> somewhat less to drinkthan usual, and 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t were giv<strong>en</strong> much less to drink than usual. Food intake is oft<strong>en</strong> more lik<strong>el</strong>ythan fluid intake to be curtailed during an episode of diarrhoea. In K<strong>en</strong>ya, about three in t<strong>en</strong> childr<strong>en</strong>with diarrhoea are offered the same amount of food as usual, but only 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t are giv<strong>en</strong> more to eatthan usual. About one-quarter are giv<strong>en</strong> somewhat less food to eat than usual, 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t are giv<strong>en</strong>much less food than usual, and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t are not giv<strong>en</strong> any food.The optimum practice for childhood diarrhoea is to continue feeding and to provide ORT orincreased fluids, or both. Overall, 43 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea in K<strong>en</strong>ya are giv<strong>en</strong> continuedfeeding as w<strong>el</strong>l as ORT or increased fluids, or both. Childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea age 48-59 months aremore lik<strong>el</strong>y to be giv<strong>en</strong> continued feeding and ORT, or more fluids than usual, or both, than arechildr<strong>en</strong> in other age groups. There is no differ<strong>en</strong>ce by sex or resid<strong>en</strong>ce; however childr<strong>en</strong> withdiarrhoea in Coast province are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be giv<strong>en</strong> continued feeding, and ORT, or more fluidsthan usual, or both, compared with childr<strong>en</strong> in other provinces. Patterns by education and wealthquintile of the mother are not uniform, though it is interesting that childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have somesecondary education or higher are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be giv<strong>en</strong> continued feeding and ORT, orincreased fluids, or both, wh<strong>en</strong> they have diarrhoea.The fact that these feeding patterns for childr<strong>en</strong> with diarrhoea have not changedconsiderably since the 2003 KDHS reflects a gap in knowledge among some mothers regarding th<strong>en</strong>utritional requirem<strong>en</strong>ts of childr<strong>en</strong> during episodes of diarrhoea illness. There is a need for furtherhealth education efforts and couns<strong>el</strong>ling on feeding to reduce the number of childr<strong>en</strong> becomingdehydrated or malnourished from diarrhoea.Child Health | 137


Table 10.8 Feeding practices during diarrhoeaPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who had diarrhoea in the two weeks preceding the survey by amount of liquids and food offered compared with normal practice, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> giv<strong>en</strong> increased fluids and continued feeding during the diarrhoea episode, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> who continued feeding and were giv<strong>en</strong> ORT orincreased fluids, or both, during the episode of diarrhoea, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicMoreAmount of liquids offeredSameasusualSomewhatlessMuchlessNoneDon’tknow/missingTotalMoreSameasusualAmount of food offeredSomewhatlessMuchlessNoneNevergavefoodDon’tknow/missingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tagegiv<strong>en</strong>increasedfluids andcontinuedfeeding 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewhocontinuedfeeding andwere giv<strong>en</strong>ORT, orincreasedfluids, orbothNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>withdiarrhoeaAge in months


10.6 KNOWLEDGE OF ORS PACKETSA simple and effective response to dehydrationcaused by diarrhoea is a prompt increase in the child’s fluidintake through some form of oral rehydration therapy, whichmay include the use of a solution prepared from packets oforal rehydration salts (ORS). To ascertain how widespreadknowledge of ORS is in K<strong>en</strong>ya, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked whetherthey knew about ORS packets. Data are tabulated in Table10.9 for wom<strong>en</strong> who gave birth in the five years before thesurvey.The table shows that almost eight in t<strong>en</strong> mothershave heard of ORS packets. Knowledge of ORS increaseswith age and lev<strong>el</strong> of education of the mother. There is aslight differ<strong>en</strong>ce in knowledge betwe<strong>en</strong> urban (82 perc<strong>en</strong>t)and rural wom<strong>en</strong> (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among provinces, mothers inNorth Eastern province are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to know about ORS(84 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than are wom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces, thoughmothers in the highest wealth quintile are only slightly mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y to know about ORS (81 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than those in th<strong>el</strong>owest quintile (77 perc<strong>en</strong>t).10.7 STOOL DISPOSALIf human faeces are left uncontained, disease mayspread by direct contact or by animal contact with the faeces.H<strong>en</strong>ce, the proper disposal of childr<strong>en</strong>’s stools is extrem<strong>el</strong>yimportant in prev<strong>en</strong>ting the spread of disease. Table 10.10pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on the disposal of the stools of childr<strong>en</strong>under age five, by background characteristics.Table 10.9 Knowledge of ORSPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of mothers age 15-49 who gavebirth in the five years preceding the survey whoknow about ORS for treatm<strong>en</strong>t of diarrhoea, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof wom<strong>en</strong>who knowabout ORSpacketsNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 66.2 25520-24 73.0 1,09225-34 82.1 1,86535-49 81.0 761Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 81.7 823Rural 77.5 3,150ProvinceNairobi 83.4 269C<strong>en</strong>tral 77.4 371Coast 83.2 330Eastern 74.1 630Nyanza 78.0 733Rift Valley 78.4 1,103Western 78.0 442North Eastern 84.3 97EducationNo education 72.9 441Primary incomplete 74.1 1,262Primary complete 77.7 1,225Secondary+ 86.7 1,045Wealth quintileLowest 77.1 843Second 74.3 764Middle 81.3 742Fourth 77.8 765Highest 81.3 859Total 78.4 3,973ORS = Oral rehydration saltsThe table shows that the most commonly usedmethod of disposal of young childr<strong>en</strong>’s stools is putting them into a toilet or latrine (59 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Other methods of disposal include rinsing stools away (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t), throwing them into garbage(6 perc<strong>en</strong>t), rinsing them into a drain or ditch (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and burying them (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Fifte<strong>en</strong>perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five use the toilet or latrine thems<strong>el</strong>ves. Overall, 78 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong>’sstools are disposed of saf<strong>el</strong>y, an improvem<strong>en</strong>t from the 58 perc<strong>en</strong>t reported in the 2003 KDHS.A closer look at the table shows marked differ<strong>en</strong>tials in the disposal of stools. In NorthEastern province, the stools of less than half of the childr<strong>en</strong> under age five are disposed of saf<strong>el</strong>y,compared with almost all of childr<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi Province (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The perc<strong>en</strong>tageof childr<strong>en</strong> whose stools are disposed of saf<strong>el</strong>y increases with the age of the child and is higher inurban areas than in rural areas. Increasing lev<strong>el</strong>s of education and wealth quintile of the mother areassociated with increased safety in disposal of childr<strong>en</strong>’s stools.Child Health | 139


Table 10.10 Disposal of childr<strong>en</strong>’s stoolsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> under age five living with the mother by the manner of disposal of the child’s last faecal matter,and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> whose stools are disposed of saf<strong>el</strong>y, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicChildusedtoilet orlatrinePut/rinsedintotoilet orlatrineManner of disposal of childr<strong>en</strong>’s stoolsBuriedPut/rinsedintodrain orditchThrownintogarbageRinsedaway Other MissingTotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tageof childr<strong>en</strong>whosestools aredisposed ofsaf<strong>el</strong>yNumberofmothersAge in months


NUTRITION OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN 11John Owuor and John MburuThis chapter covers nutritional concerns for childr<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>. Information about infantand young child feeding practices, including breastfeeding and feeding with solid/semisolid foods arepres<strong>en</strong>ted for childr<strong>en</strong>. Anthropometric assessm<strong>en</strong>t of nutritional status, diversity of foods consumed,micronutri<strong>en</strong>t intake, and vitamin A defici<strong>en</strong>cy are pres<strong>en</strong>ted for wom<strong>en</strong> and childr<strong>en</strong> under age five.Adequate nutrition is critical to child dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. The period from birth to two years of ageis important for optimal growth, health, and dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. Unfortunat<strong>el</strong>y, this period is oft<strong>en</strong> markedby growth faltering, micronutri<strong>en</strong>t defici<strong>en</strong>cies, and common childhood illnesses such as diarrhoeaand acute respiratory infections (ARI). Feeding practices reported in this chapter include earlyinitiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months of life, continuedbreastfeeding for up to two years of age and beyond, tim<strong>el</strong>y introduction of complem<strong>en</strong>tary feeding atsix months of age, frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of feeding solid/semisolid foods, and the diversity of food groups fed tochildr<strong>en</strong> betwe<strong>en</strong> 6 and 23 months of age. A summary indicator that describes the quality of infantand young child (age 6-23 months) feeding practices (IYCF) is included.A woman’s nutritional status has important implications for her health as w<strong>el</strong>l as the health ofher childr<strong>en</strong>. Malnutrition in wom<strong>en</strong> results in reduced productivity, an increased susceptibility toinfections, slow recovery from illness, and height<strong>en</strong>ed risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Forexample, a woman who has poor nutritional status as indicated by a low body mass index (BMI),short stature, anaemia, or other micronutri<strong>en</strong>t defici<strong>en</strong>cies has a greater risk of obstructed labour, ofhaving a baby with low birth weight, of producing lower quality breast milk, of mortality due topostpartum haemorrhage, and of morbidity of both hers<strong>el</strong>f and her baby.11.1 NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF CHILDRENAnthropometric data on height and weight collected in the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic andHealth Survey (KDHS) permit the measurem<strong>en</strong>t and evaluation of the nutritional status of youngchildr<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya. This evaluation allows id<strong>en</strong>tification of subgroups of the child population that areat increased risk of faltered growth, disease, impaired m<strong>en</strong>tal dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t, and death.11.1.1 Measurem<strong>en</strong>t of Nutritional Status among Young Childr<strong>en</strong>The 2008-09 KDHS collected data on the nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> by measuring theheight and weight of all childr<strong>en</strong> under six years of age. Data were collected with the aim ofcalculating three indices—nam<strong>el</strong>y, weight-for-age, height-for-age, and weight-for-height—all ofwhich take age and sex into consideration. Weight measurem<strong>en</strong>ts were obtained using lightweight,bathroom-type scales with a digital scre<strong>en</strong> designed and manufactured under the guidance ofUNICEF. Height measurem<strong>en</strong>ts were carried out using a measuring board. Childr<strong>en</strong> younger than 24months were measured lying down (recumb<strong>en</strong>t l<strong>en</strong>gth) on the board, while standing height wasmeasured for older childr<strong>en</strong>.For this report, indicators of the nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> are calculated using new growthstandards published by WHO in 2006. These new growth standards were g<strong>en</strong>erated using datacollected in the WHO Multic<strong>en</strong>tre Growth Refer<strong>en</strong>ce Study (WHO, 2006). The study, whose sampleincluded 8,440 childr<strong>en</strong> in six countries, was designed to provide a description of how childr<strong>en</strong> shouldgrow under optimal conditions. The WHO Child Growth Standards can therefore be used to assesschildr<strong>en</strong> all over the world, regardless of ethnicity, social and economic influ<strong>en</strong>ces, and feedingpractices. Each of the three nutritional status indicators described b<strong>el</strong>ow is expressed in standarddeviation units from the median of the Multic<strong>en</strong>tre Growth Refer<strong>en</strong>ce Study sample.Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 141


Each of these indices—height-for-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for-age—providesdiffer<strong>en</strong>t information about growth and body composition, which is used to assess nutritional status.The height-for-age index is an indicator of linear growth retardation and cumulative growth deficits.Childr<strong>en</strong> whose height-for-age Z-score is b<strong>el</strong>ow minus two standard deviations (-2 SD) are consideredshort for their age (stunted) and are chronically malnourished. Childr<strong>en</strong> who are b<strong>el</strong>ow minus threestandard deviations (-3 SD) are considered sever<strong>el</strong>y stunted. Stunting reflects failure to receiveadequate nutrition over a long period of time and is also affected by recurr<strong>en</strong>t and chronic illness.Height-for-age, therefore, repres<strong>en</strong>ts the long-term effects of malnutrition in a population and is nots<strong>en</strong>sitive to rec<strong>en</strong>t, short-term changes in dietary intake.The weight-for-height index measures body mass in r<strong>el</strong>ation to body height or l<strong>en</strong>gth anddescribes curr<strong>en</strong>t nutritional status. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose Z-scores are b<strong>el</strong>ow minus two standard deviations(-2 SD) are considered thin (wasted) and are acut<strong>el</strong>y malnourished. Wasting repres<strong>en</strong>ts the failure toreceive adequate nutrition in the period immediat<strong>el</strong>y preceding the survey and may be the result ofinadequate food intake or a rec<strong>en</strong>t episode of illness causing loss of weight and the onset ofmalnutrition. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose weight-for-height is b<strong>el</strong>ow minus three standard deviations (-3 SD) areconsidered sever<strong>el</strong>y wasted.Weight-for-age is a composite index of height-for-age and weight-for-height. It takes intoaccount both acute and chronic malnutrition. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose weight-for-age is b<strong>el</strong>ow minus twostandard deviations are classified as underweight. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose weight-for-age is b<strong>el</strong>ow minusthree standard deviations (-3 SD) are considered sever<strong>el</strong>y underweight.11.1.2 Results of Data CollectionMeasurem<strong>en</strong>ts of height and weight were obtained for all childr<strong>en</strong> born since January 2003living in the households s<strong>el</strong>ected for the KDHS sample. The results include childr<strong>en</strong> who were notbiological offspring of the wom<strong>en</strong> interviewed in the survey.Although data were collected for all childr<strong>en</strong> under age six, for purposes of comparability, theanalysis is limited to childr<strong>en</strong> under age five. Height and weight measurem<strong>en</strong>ts were obtained foralmost 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the 6,092 (unweighted) childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who were pres<strong>en</strong>t in sampledhouseholds at the time of the survey. An additional 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> were considered to haveimplausibly high or low values for the height or weight measures or lacked data on the child’s age inmonths. The following analysis focuses on the childr<strong>en</strong> for whom complete and plausibleanthropometric and age data were collected.11.1.3 Lev<strong>el</strong>s of MalnutritionTable 11.1 and Figure 11.1 indicate the nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> under five as measuredby stunting (height-for-age) and various background characteristics. Nationally, 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong>under five are stunted, while the proportion sever<strong>el</strong>y stunted is 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Analysis of the indicatorby age group shows that stunting is highest (46 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in childr<strong>en</strong> age 18-23 months and lowest (11perc<strong>en</strong>t) in childr<strong>en</strong> age less than 6 months. Severe stunting shows a similar tr<strong>en</strong>d, where childr<strong>en</strong> age18-23 months have the highest proportion of sever<strong>el</strong>y stunted childr<strong>en</strong> (22 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and those less than6 months have the lowest proportion (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t).A higher proportion (37 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of male childr<strong>en</strong> under five years are stunted, compared with33 perc<strong>en</strong>t of female childr<strong>en</strong>. There is an inverse r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> the l<strong>en</strong>gth of the precedingbirth interval and the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who are stunted. The longer the interval, the less lik<strong>el</strong>ythe child is to be stunted. The mother’s Body Mass Index (BMI) also has an inverse r<strong>el</strong>ationship withsevere stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s. For example, mothers who are thin (BMI< 18.5) have childr<strong>en</strong> with the higheststunting lev<strong>el</strong>s (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers are overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25) have th<strong>el</strong>owest stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t).142 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


Table 11.1 Nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years classified as malnourished according to three anthropometric indices of nutritional status: height-for-age, weight-for-height,and weight-for-age, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow-3 SDHeight-for-age Weight-for-height Weight-for-agePerc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow-2 SD 1Mean Perc<strong>en</strong>tageZ-score b<strong>el</strong>ow(SD) -3 SDPerc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow-2 SD 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tageabove+2 SDMeanZ-score(SD)Perc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow-3 SDPerc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow-2 SD 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tageabove+2 SDMeanZ-score(SD)Age in months


Figure 11.1 Nutritional Status of Childr<strong>en</strong> by Age60Perc<strong>en</strong>t50403020100## ###### # ## ####### ## ## # ##### ## # ## # ### ## ###### ##### ## ## # ## ##)) )) ) ) ) ))) ) ))) ))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )#) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )0 2 4 6 8 10121416182022242628303234363840424446485052545658Age (months)Stunted ) Wasted # UnderweightK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Childr<strong>en</strong> living in rural areas are moderat<strong>el</strong>y and sever<strong>el</strong>y stunted to a greater ext<strong>en</strong>t (37perc<strong>en</strong>t), wh<strong>en</strong> compared with rural childr<strong>en</strong> (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t). At the provincial lev<strong>el</strong>, Eastern province(42 perc<strong>en</strong>t) has the highest proportion of stunted childr<strong>en</strong>, while Nairobi province has the lowest (29perc<strong>en</strong>t).The mother’s lev<strong>el</strong> of education g<strong>en</strong>erally has an inverse r<strong>el</strong>ationship with stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s. Forexample, childr<strong>en</strong> of mothers with at least some secondary education have the lowest stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s(26 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have no education or only incomplete primary educationhave the highest lev<strong>el</strong>s of stunting (39-40 perc<strong>en</strong>t). A similar inverse r<strong>el</strong>ationship is observed betwe<strong>en</strong>the household wealth index and the stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s for childr<strong>en</strong>, that is, childr<strong>en</strong> in the lowesthousehold wealth quintile record the highest stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The proportion of stuntedchildr<strong>en</strong> declines with increase in the wealth quintile.Table 11.1 also shows the nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years as measured bywasting or low weight-for-age. Overall, 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> are wasted and 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t are sever<strong>el</strong>ywasted. Analysis of the indicator by age group shows that wasting is highest (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in childr<strong>en</strong>age 6-8 months and lowest (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in childr<strong>en</strong> age 36-47 months. The survey data show that NorthEastern province has extraordinarily high lev<strong>el</strong>s of wasting: 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five in NorthEastern province are wasted and 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t are sever<strong>el</strong>y wasted. These lev<strong>el</strong>s may reflect food stress inthe province, which is traditionally a region with food deficits. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have noeducation also have very high lev<strong>el</strong>s of wasting and severe wasting (15 and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).Wealth and nutrition status of mother are also negativ<strong>el</strong>y corr<strong>el</strong>ated with the proportionof childr<strong>en</strong> who are wasted.As shown in Table 11.1, 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five are underweight (low weight-forage)and 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t are sever<strong>el</strong>y underweight. The proportion of underweight childr<strong>en</strong> is highest (19perc<strong>en</strong>t) in the age groups 24-35 and 48-59 months and lowest (8 perc<strong>en</strong>t) for those less than sixmonths of age. Female childr<strong>en</strong> (15 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are slightly less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be underweight than malechildr<strong>en</strong> (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Rural childr<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be underweight (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than urban childr<strong>en</strong> (10perc<strong>en</strong>t). At the provincial lev<strong>el</strong>, North Eastern province has the highest proportion of moderate andsever<strong>el</strong>y underweight childr<strong>en</strong> (25 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while Nairobi province has the lowest proportion (8perc<strong>en</strong>t).144 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


The proportion of underweight childr<strong>en</strong> is negativ<strong>el</strong>y corr<strong>el</strong>ated with the lev<strong>el</strong> of education ofthe mother. Childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have no education have the highest lev<strong>el</strong>s of underweight (28perc<strong>en</strong>t), while childr<strong>en</strong> of mothers with some secondary education have the lowest (8 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Wealth and nutrition status of mother are also negativ<strong>el</strong>y corr<strong>el</strong>ated with the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong>who are underweight.Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong> for the period 2000 to 2008-09 are shown in Table11.2. For this table, data for 2008-09 were recalculated using the previous international nutritionalrefer<strong>en</strong>ce population and thus will not be comparable to data in Table 11.1.Table 11.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years classified as malnourished according to three anthropometric indices of nutritionalstatus: height-for-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for age, K<strong>en</strong>ya, 2000 to 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicHeight for ageStuntingWeight for heightWastingWeight for ageUnderweight2000 2003 2008-09 2000 2003 2008-09 2000 2003 2008-09Age in months< 6 12.4 7.4 5.4 2.4 3.9 3.9 3.0 2.4 2.56-11 24.5 15.3 21.6 3.9 6.0 5.8 14.6 15.1 15.212-23 47.5 43.1 41.7 9.9 9.5 7.5 28.4 26.8 23.824-35 34.8 35.5 32.5 6.6 5.5 7.0 22.5 25.3 25.036-47 34.5 34.1 28.3 4.1 4.3 3.2 19.4 20.8 20.248-59 34.7 27.9 30.4 4.9 3.4 6.3 21.9 17.8 22.2SexMale 37.9 32.9 30.8 6.6 6.4 6.7 22.6 22.0 20.7Female 32.6 27.7 28.3 5.3 4.8 4.9 19.6 17.7 19.8Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 26.6 23.6 21.6 3.3 4.2 4.6 12.4 12.6 12.6Rural 38.0 31.7 31.2 6.8 5.8 6.1 23.9 21.3 21.8ProvinceNairobi 29.6 18.7 22.7 3.1 4.5 2.6 12.4 6.3 10.0C<strong>en</strong>tral 27.4 27.0 25.7 4.6 4.4 4.5 15.4 14.6 16.7Coast 33.7 34.9 34.0 6.4 5.7 11.2 21.1 25.4 28.5Eastern 42.8 32.5 32.8 7.8 4.2 6.7 29.6 21.4 25.2Nyanza 35.9 31.1 26.9 5.2 2.3 3.2 19.9 15.6 13.7Rift Valley 36.8 31.6 30.9 7.6 7.7 6.7 24.9 24.0 23.7Western 38.1 30.2 28.4 5.5 4.5 2.6 21.5 19.0 14.8North Eastern na 24.3 31.1 na 26.5 18.4 na 33.7 31.1Mother’s educationNo education 37.2 36.4 34.2 7.1 14.8 12.8 24.1 33.1 34.5Primary incomplete na 34.8 34.4 na 5.1 5.9 na 21.9 23.5Primary complete na 30.5 29.8 na 2.8 4.6 na 17.3 18.9Secondary+ 25.6 19.2 19.3 3.4 3.6 3.0 13.7 10.6 10.0Total 35.3 30.3 29.6 6.0 5.6 5.8 21.2 19.9 20.3Note: Numbers refer to the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> who are more than two standard deviation units from the median of theNCHS/CDC/WHO international refer<strong>en</strong>ce population and thus the data for 2008-09 will not match the figures in Table 11.1.Figures for 2000 are from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (CBS, 2001) and exclude areas in rural North Easternprovince.na = Not applicableThe proportion of stunted childr<strong>en</strong> declined from 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2000 to 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Since 2003, the proportion of stunted childr<strong>en</strong> has remained unchanged. Analysis of the indicator byage group shows that since 2003, stunting lev<strong>el</strong>s have increased in the 6-11 month and 48-59 monthage categories. Among male childr<strong>en</strong> under five, the proportion stunted has declined from 33 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003 to 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 while among female childr<strong>en</strong>, it has remained unchanged. Theproportion stunted among childr<strong>en</strong> in urban areas declined by two perc<strong>en</strong>tage points from 24 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003 to 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09; however in rural areas, the change was insignificant. Mostprovinces show a drop in the proportion of stunted childr<strong>en</strong> since 2003, except for North Easternprovince, where the proportion stunted increased by almost 7 perc<strong>en</strong>tage points; Nairobi provincewhere it increased by 4 perc<strong>en</strong>tage points, and Eastern province where it was virtually unchanged.There are only minor changes in stunting over time according to mother’s education.Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 145


Overall, the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who are wasted has changed little since 2000. Tr<strong>en</strong>ds inwasting by background characteristics are mostly small, except in Coast province where theproportion increased and North Eastern province, where there was a decline (from 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003to 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09). There has also be<strong>en</strong> a sizeable increase in wasting among childr<strong>en</strong> ofwom<strong>en</strong> with no education.With regard to the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> underweight, Table 11.2 shows a slight declinebetwe<strong>en</strong> 2000 and 2003, but almost no change betwe<strong>en</strong> 2003 and 2008-09. There are slightfluctuations in the proportion underweight by background characteristics, but most are minor. Allprovinces show an increase in the proportion of underweight childr<strong>en</strong> since 2003 except Nyanza andWestern provinces (Figure 11.2). In Nairobi, although the proportion of underweight childr<strong>en</strong> is th<strong>el</strong>owest, it has almost doubled since 2003, while Eastern and Coast provinces have experi<strong>en</strong>cedsubstantial increases in the proportion of underweight childr<strong>en</strong>. Since 2000, the proportion ofunderweight childr<strong>en</strong> increased substantially for mothers with no education, from 24 to 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2008-09.Figure 11.2 Proportion of Underweight Childr<strong>en</strong> by Province,2003 and 2008-0940Perc<strong>en</strong>t3530252015105610.0151725292125161424.02419.015343120200Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern Nyanza Rift Valley Western NorthEastern2003 2008-09Total11.2 INITIATION OF BREASTFEEDINGEarly initiation of breastfeeding is <strong>en</strong>couraged for a number of reasons. Mothers b<strong>en</strong>efit fromearly suckling because it stimulates breast milk production and facilitates the r<strong>el</strong>ease of oxytocin,which h<strong>el</strong>ps the contraction of the uterus and reduces postpartum blood loss. The first breast milkcontains colostrum, which is highly nutritious and has antibodies that protect the newborn fromdiseases. Early initiation of breastfeeding also fosters bonding betwe<strong>en</strong> mother and child.Table 11.3 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> born in the five years before the survey bybreastfeeding status and the timing of initial breastfeeding, according to background characteristics.Results indicate that 97 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> are breastfed at some point. Overall, 58 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong>are breastfed within one hour of birth and 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t within one day after d<strong>el</strong>ivery. The proportion ofwom<strong>en</strong> initiating breastfeeding within one hour of birth is highest in North Eastern province (75perc<strong>en</strong>t) and lowest in Western province (34 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Forty-two perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> are giv<strong>en</strong> something before breastfeeding (pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed).Male childr<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than female childr<strong>en</strong> (39perc<strong>en</strong>t). Mothers in rural areas (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to practise pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feeding than thosein urban areas (35 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who receive a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed is negativ<strong>el</strong>ycorr<strong>el</strong>ated with the lev<strong>el</strong> of education of the mother; childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have no education are146 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


the most lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed (54 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while those whose mothers have att<strong>en</strong>dedsecondary school are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be fed before starting breastfeeding (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Pr<strong>el</strong>actealfeeding is most common in Western and North Eastern provinces and least common in C<strong>en</strong>tralprovince. Childr<strong>en</strong> born at home are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to receive a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed (51 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than thoseborn in a health facility (31 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who receive a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed isnegativ<strong>el</strong>y corr<strong>el</strong>ated with the household wealth.Table 11.3 Initial breastfeedingPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> born in the five years preceding the survey who were ever breastfed, and for the lastchildr<strong>en</strong> born in the five years preceding the survey ever breastfed, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who started breastfeedingwithin one hour and within one day of birth and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who received a pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feed, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicBreastfeeding amongchildr<strong>en</strong> bornin last five yearsPerc<strong>en</strong>tageeverbreastfedNumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>born in lastfive yearsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho startedbreastfeedingwithin 1 hourof birthAmong last-born childr<strong>en</strong> ever breastfed:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho startedbreastfeedingwithin 1 dayof birth 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receiveda pr<strong>el</strong>actealfeed 2Number oflast-bornchildr<strong>en</strong>everbreastfedSexMale 96.6 3,027 57.0 85.7 44.5 2,036Female 97.5 2,825 59.3 87.2 38.8 1,845Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 97.1 1,074 54.3 86.0 35.2 805Rural 97.1 4,777 59.1 86.5 43.5 3,076ProvinceNairobi 96.4 334 56.3 88.1 24.7 260C<strong>en</strong>tral 96.0 466 55.3 88.7 16.4 361Coast 97.0 495 42.6 71.5 56.5 325Eastern 95.7 890 69.4 96.0 19.2 616Nyanza 97.6 1,145 61.3 86.7 46.1 721Rift Valley 97.5 1,642 63.7 86.1 48.0 1,072Western 97.7 703 33.7 81.5 67.9 431North Eastern 97.7 178 75.4 83.6 59.5 96Mother’s educationNo education 96.5 763 59.0 78.8 54.4 429Primary incomplete 97.4 1,952 54.8 85.7 47.0 1,241Primary complete 97.3 1,761 60.0 88.3 36.4 1,198Secondary+ 96.6 1,375 59.3 88.1 36.4 1,014Assistance at d<strong>el</strong>iveryHealth professional 3 96.6 2,590 59.6 89.5 31.7 1,877Traditional birth att<strong>en</strong>dant 97.8 1,613 53.9 84.9 57.5 954Other 97.2 1,239 61.9 82.8 44.0 801No one 96.7 397 50.7 80.5 50.5 248Place of d<strong>el</strong>iveryHealth facility 96.5 2,493 59.4 89.3 31.1 1,804At home 97.5 3,341 56.9 83.9 51.2 2,072Wealth quintileLowest 96.1 1,445 57.9 82.7 50.7 819Second 97.7 1,190 59.4 86.0 48.1 752Middle 97.3 1,085 56.2 88.4 43.7 725Fourth 97.5 1,038 59.5 86.9 37.4 748Highest 97.0 1,095 57.3 88.1 29.7 837Total 97.1 5,852 58.1 86.4 41.8 3,881Note: Table is based on births in the last five years whether the childr<strong>en</strong> are living or dead at the time ofinterview. Total includes 12 births for whom assistance at d<strong>el</strong>ivery is missing and 17 births for whom place ofd<strong>el</strong>ivery is ‘other’ or missing.1Includes childr<strong>en</strong> who started breastfeeding within one hour of birth2Childr<strong>en</strong> giv<strong>en</strong> something other than breast milk during the first three days of life3Doctor, nurse, or midwifeAs shown in Figure 11.3, the most common pr<strong>el</strong>acteal item is plain water (37 perc<strong>en</strong>t), thoughroughly one-quarter of newborns who are giv<strong>en</strong> pr<strong>el</strong>acteal feeds receive sugar water or sugar and saltwater.Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 147


Figure 11.3 Pr<strong>el</strong>acteal Liquids50Perc<strong>en</strong>t40373027232013100Milkother thanbreast milkPlainwaterSugar orglucosewater5GripewaterSugar &salt water1 2FruitjuiceInfantformula3Tea/infusions0 1HoneyOtherPr<strong>el</strong>acteal liquidsK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0911.3 BREASTFEEDING STATUS BY AGEUNICEF and WHO recomm<strong>en</strong>d that childr<strong>en</strong> be exclusiv<strong>el</strong>y breastfed during the first 6months of life and that childr<strong>en</strong> be giv<strong>en</strong> solid or semisolid complem<strong>en</strong>tary food in addition tocontinued breastfeeding from 6 months until 24 months or more wh<strong>en</strong> the child is fully weaned.Exclusive breastfeeding is recomm<strong>en</strong>ded because breast milk is uncontaminated and contains all th<strong>en</strong>utri<strong>en</strong>ts necessary for childr<strong>en</strong> in the first few months of life. In addition, the mother’s antibodies inbreast milk provide immunity to disease. Early supplem<strong>en</strong>tation is discouraged for several reasons.First, it exposes infants to pathog<strong>en</strong>s and increases their risk of infection, especially disease. Second,it decreases infants’ intake of breast milk and therefore suckling, which reduces breast milkproduction. Third, in low-resource settings, supplem<strong>en</strong>tary food is oft<strong>en</strong> nutritionally inferior.Information on complem<strong>en</strong>tary feeding was obtained by asking mothers about the curr<strong>en</strong>tbreastfeeding status of all childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age and, for the youngest child born in thethree-year period before the survey and living with the mother, foods and liquids giv<strong>en</strong> to the child theday and night before the survey.Table 11.4 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> under three years living withthe mother by breastfeeding status and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under three years using a bottle with anipple, according to age in months. The data pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 11.4 and Figure 11.4 show that theduration of breastfeeding in K<strong>en</strong>ya is long. The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly breastfeedingis highest (99 perc<strong>en</strong>t) for childr<strong>en</strong> up to 6-8 months of age before it begins to slowly decline as thechild’s age progresses. However, 84 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-17 months are still being breastfed, asare 59 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age 18-23 months old.148 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


Table 11.4 Breastfeeding status by agePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> under three years who are living with their mother by breastfeeding status and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage curr<strong>en</strong>tlybreastfeeding; and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all childr<strong>en</strong> under three years using a bottle with a nipple, according to age in months, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age in monthsNotbreastfeedingExclusiv<strong>el</strong>ybreastfedBreastfeeding and consuming:Plainwater onlyNon-milkliquids/juiceOthermilkPerc<strong>en</strong>tagecurr<strong>en</strong>tlybreastfeedingComplem<strong>en</strong>taryfoodsTotalNumber ofyoungestchild underthree yearsPerc<strong>en</strong>tageusing abottle witha nipple 1Numberofchildr<strong>en</strong>0-1 1.1 51.8 22.7 3.7 10.5 10.2 100.0 98.9 159 17.1 1612-3 0.9 34.8 12.3 0.1 20.4 31.5 100.0 99.1 173 21.5 1744-5 0.7 13.2 10.4 0.3 15.6 59.9 100.0 99.3 195 33.1 2006-8 1.2 3.6 3.5 0.0 7.9 83.9 100.0 98.8 324 28.9 3279-11 6.6 0.1 0.6 1.0 6.2 85.5 100.0 93.4 272 26.1 27912-17 16.0 0.0 0.8 0.5 1.3 81.4 100.0 84.0 514 14.7 53018-23 40.7 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.5 57.9 100.0 59.3 501 8.8 56624-35 77.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 20.9 100.0 22.1 765 5.9 1,1320-3 1.0 42.9 17.3 1.8 15.7 21.3 100.0 99.0 332 19.4 3350-5 0.9 31.9 14.7 1.2 15.6 35.6 100.0 99.1 527 24.5 5356-9 2.0 2.8 2.9 0.4 9.0 82.8 100.0 98.0 416 29.9 41912-15 14.0 0.0 1.0 0.6 1.6 82.7 100.0 86.0 333 16.9 34112-23 28.2 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.9 69.8 100.0 71.8 1,015 11.6 1,09620-23 46.4 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.3 52.3 100.0 53.6 320 6.7 366Note: Breastfeeding status refers to a ‘24-hour’ period (yesterday and last night). Childr<strong>en</strong> who are classified as breastfeeding and consumingplain water only consumed no liquid or solid supplem<strong>en</strong>ts. The categories of not breastfeeding, exclusiv<strong>el</strong>y breastfed, breastfeeding andconsuming plain water, non-milk liquids/juice, other milk, and complem<strong>en</strong>tary foods (solids and semi-solids) are hierarchical and mutuallyexclusive, and their perc<strong>en</strong>tages add to 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Thus childr<strong>en</strong> who receive breast milk and non-milk liquids and who do not receivecomplem<strong>en</strong>tary foods are classified in the non-milk liquid category ev<strong>en</strong> though they may also get plain water. Any childr<strong>en</strong> who getcomplem<strong>en</strong>tary food are classified in that category as long as they are breastfeeding as w<strong>el</strong>l.1Based on all childr<strong>en</strong> under three yearsFigure 11.4 Infant Feeding Practices by Age100%Not breastfed80%60%Breast milk & complem<strong>en</strong>tary foodsBreast milk & other milk/formulaBreast milk & non-milk liquidsBreast milk & plain water onlyExclusiv<strong>el</strong>y breastfed40%20%0%


Table 11.4 shows that bottle-feeding is still preval<strong>en</strong>t in K<strong>en</strong>ya. One-quarter of childr<strong>en</strong> under6 months are fed using a bottle with a nipple. The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> feeding using a bottle with anipple is highest (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t) in the 4-5 months age group. The continued practice of bottle-feeding isa concern because of the possible contamination due to unsafe water and lack of hygi<strong>en</strong>e inpreparation.11.4 DURATION AND FREQUENCY OF BREASTFEEDINGTable 11.5 shows the median duration of breastfeeding by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics.The estimates of median and mean durations of breastfeeding are based on curr<strong>en</strong>t status data,that is, the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> in the three years preceding the survey who were being breastfed atthe time of the survey.Table 11.5 Median duration and frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of breastfeedingMedian duration of any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding, and predominant breastfeeding among childr<strong>en</strong>born in the three years preceding the survey, perc<strong>en</strong>tage of breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong> under six months living withthe mother who were breastfed six or more times in the 24 hours preceding the survey, and mean number offeeds (day/night), by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicMedian duration (months)of breastfeeding among childr<strong>en</strong>born in the last three years 1AnybreastfeedingExclusivebreastfeedingPredominantbreastfeeding3Perc<strong>en</strong>tagebreastfed6+ times inlast 24hoursFrequ<strong>en</strong>cy of breastfeedingamong childr<strong>en</strong> under six months 2Meannumber ofday feedsMeannumber ofnight feedsNumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>SexMale 19.9 0.6 1.9 91.1 7.2 4.5 277Female 21.2 1.3 2.5 95.4 7.0 4.8 237Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 19.3 0.6 2.2 94.3 7.2 5.1 80Rural 21.3 1.0 2.2 92.8 7.0 4.5 435ProvinceNairobi 14.6 0.5 1.9 (95.3) (7.4) (5.8) 33C<strong>en</strong>tral 19.2 0.6 3.7 (92.6) (7.6) (4.5) 38Coast 19.8 0.5 2.4 95.4 7.8 4.8 39Eastern 25.5 2.6 3.3 95.2 7.7 5.0 87Nyanza 18.6 0.6 1.4 84.9 5.0 4.2 108Rift Valley 21.0 1.7 2.3 97.0 8.0 4.4 143Western 19.9 1.1 1.8 90.5 6.0 4.2 47North Eastern 17.4 0.4 0.5 98.9 8.3 5.6 18Mother’s educationNo education 21.1 0.6 1.6 98.7 9.4 5.3 67Primary incomplete 21.4 0.7 2.3 92.9 6.9 4.5 157Primary complete 20.3 1.8 2.3 91.3 6.5 4.5 157Secondary+ 19.3 0.5 2.1 92.5 6.7 4.6 133Wealth quintileLowest 21.4 1.8 2.4 95.2 7.4 4.8 146Second 19.3 0.7 2.1 91.5 6.4 4.6 97Middle 20.1 0.6 0.9 94.0 7.2 4.3 93Fourth 21.4 0.7 3.0 93.8 7.2 4.2 97Highest 19.7 0.6 2.1 89.2 7.0 5.1 81Total 20.5 0.7 2.2 93.1 7.1 4.6 514Mean for all childr<strong>en</strong> 20.7 2.6 3.7 na na na naNote: Median and mean durations are based on curr<strong>en</strong>t status. Includes childr<strong>en</strong> living and deceased at the timeof the survey. Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted childr<strong>en</strong>.na = Not applicable1It is assumed that non-last-born childr<strong>en</strong> and last-born childr<strong>en</strong> not curr<strong>en</strong>tly living with the mother are notcurr<strong>en</strong>tly breastfeeding2Excludes childr<strong>en</strong> without a valid answer on the number of times breastfed3Either exclusiv<strong>el</strong>y breastfed or received breast milk and plain water, and/or non-milk liquids only150 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


The median duration for any breastfeeding among K<strong>en</strong>yan childr<strong>en</strong> is 21 months, which issimilar to the duration docum<strong>en</strong>ted in previous KDHS surveys, implying that there has be<strong>en</strong> littlechange in breastfeeding patterns over time. The median duration of exclusive breastfeeding is lessthan one month, though the mean duration is 3 months.The median duration of any breastfeeding is slightly longer in rural areas (21 months) than inurban areas (19 months). Girls are breastfed slightly longer than boys. At the provincial lev<strong>el</strong>,duration of breastfeeding is longest in Eastern province (26 months) and shortest in Nairobi province(15 months). The data show that wom<strong>en</strong> with no education t<strong>en</strong>d to breastfeed slightly longer (21months) than those who have at least some secondary education (19 months).Frequ<strong>en</strong>t breastfeeding of childr<strong>en</strong> is a common occurr<strong>en</strong>ce in K<strong>en</strong>ya. More than nine in t<strong>en</strong>(93 perc<strong>en</strong>t) infants under six months of age were breastfed six or more times in the 24 hours prior tothe survey. Childr<strong>en</strong> are breastfed an average of 7 times during the day and 5 times during the night.North Eastern province has the highest mean number of times childr<strong>en</strong> are breastfed, while Nyanzaprovince has the lowest.11.5 TYPES OF COMPLEMENTARY FOODSUNICEF and WHO recomm<strong>en</strong>d the introduction of solid food to infants around the age of6 months because by that age breast milk alone is no longer suffici<strong>en</strong>t to maintain a child’s optimalgrowth. In the transition to eating the family diet, childr<strong>en</strong> from the age of 6 months should be fedsmall quantities of solid and semisolid foods throughout the day. During this transition period (ages6-23 months), the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of malnutrition increases substantially in many countries because ofincreased infections and poor feeding practices.Table 11.6 provides information on the types of food giv<strong>en</strong> to youngest childr<strong>en</strong> under threeyears of age living with their mother on the day and night preceding the survey, according to theirbreastfeeding status. The data indicate that in K<strong>en</strong>ya, the practice of feeding childr<strong>en</strong> with any solid orsemi-solid foods starts early in life. By the age of 4-5 months, three in t<strong>en</strong> (60 perc<strong>en</strong>t) breastfedchildr<strong>en</strong> are also being fed solid or semi-solid foods. Use of infant formula milk and fortified babyfoods is minimal. Only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under three years receive commercially produced infantformula.The most commonly used foods giv<strong>en</strong> to breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong> under age three include foodmade from grains (72 perc<strong>en</strong>t), vitamin-A rich fruits and vegetables (53 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and other milk (51perc<strong>en</strong>t). Foods made from grains are introduced to childr<strong>en</strong> by two to three months (31 perc<strong>en</strong>t); bysix to eight months, 81 perc<strong>en</strong>t are already receiving these foods. Protein-rich foods (meat, fish,poultry, and eggs) are introduced gradually from six to eight months. G<strong>en</strong>erally, for all childr<strong>en</strong> underthree years of age, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage consuming protein-rich foods in the previous 24 hours does not riseabove 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Foods made from roots and tubers or from legumes are introduced gradually from15 perc<strong>en</strong>t of breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-8 months up to one-third or more of childr<strong>en</strong> 24-35 monthsold. Fruits and vegetables are consumed much earlier and consumption increases rapidly with the ageof the child, especially for fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin A.G<strong>en</strong>erally, the proportions of non-breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong> who consume food from a foodgroup are higher than for breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong>, which is plausible, since non-breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>d to be older than breastfeeding childr<strong>en</strong>.Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 151


Table 11.6 Foods and liquids consumed by childr<strong>en</strong> in the day or night preceding the interviewPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> under three years of age who are living with the mother by type of foods consumed in the day or night preceding theinterview, according to breastfeeding status and age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age inmonthsInfantformulaLiquidsOthermilk 1Otherliquids 2FortifiedbabyfoodsFoodmadefromgrains 3Solid or semi-solid foodsFruits andvegetables Otherrich in fruits andvitamin A 4 vegetablesBREASTFEEDING CHILDRENFoodmadefromroots andtubersFoodmadefromlegumesand nutsMeat,fish,poultry,and eggsCheese,yogurt,other milkproductAny solidor semisolidfoodNumberofchildr<strong>en</strong>0-1 2.1 13.8 4.4 0.1 9.7 1.4 0.8 0.1 1.9 2.9 0.3 10.3 1572-3 3.3 35.6 7.1 3.8 31.1 6.2 6.8 1.3 1.3 0.6 1.5 31.8 1724-5 1.8 46.5 10.7 1.6 53.6 18.5 14.4 7.8 3.3 7.6 1.3 60.3 1946-8 2.9 57.8 32.9 4.6 81.0 44.5 30.2 14.9 14.9 13.1 2.5 84.9 3209-11 4.3 64.2 51.7 7.4 87.5 67.5 30.1 28.2 29.3 17.7 9.8 91.5 25412-17 2.7 54.6 64.2 5.0 89.6 72.9 41.0 23.7 30.8 28.7 5.5 96.9 43218-23 1.6 54.5 78.0 2.3 84.2 82.9 41.9 34.4 37.2 33.8 5.1 97.7 29724-35 1.3 58.3 81.2 1.6 89.7 73.2 30.1 32.6 39.1 36.2 6.4 94.6 1696-23 2.8 57.2 57.2 4.8 85.9 67.1 36.4 24.9 28.0 23.9 5.5 93.1 1,304Total 2.6 51.0 46.3 3.7 72.3 52.5 28.4 19.9 22.2 19.7 4.4 78.2 1,996NON-BREASTFEEDING CHILDREN12-17 6.2 67.4 77.1 5.0 94.9 79.7 43.6 27.8 22.9 36.5 3.2 98.8 8218-23 2.5 55.2 86.5 4.1 91.6 82.3 48.8 38.8 33.9 37.7 8.0 97.3 20424-35 2.3 54.7 87.0 4.7 89.2 83.3 40.6 34.7 42.2 37.6 9.5 97.7 5966-23 3.7 60.9 81.5 4.5 92.6 80.4 46.2 34.7 29.8 36.4 6.3 97.8 308Total 2.8 56.8 84.7 4.6 90.2 81.9 42.4 34.5 37.8 37.0 8.4 97.5 908Note: Breastfeeding status and food consumed refer to a ‘24-hour’ period (yesterday and last night).1Other milk includes fresh, tinned and powdered cow or other animal milk2Doesn’t include plain water3Includes fortified baby food4Includes pumpkin, y<strong>el</strong>low yams, butternut squash, carrots, y<strong>el</strong>low sweet potatoes, gre<strong>en</strong> leafy vegetables, mangoes, papayas, and guavas11.6 INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING PRACTICESInfant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices include tim<strong>el</strong>y initiation of feedingsolid/semisolid foods from age 6 months and increasing the amount and variety of foods andfrequ<strong>en</strong>cy of feeding as the child gets older, while maintaining frequ<strong>en</strong>t breastfeeding. Guid<strong>el</strong>ineshave be<strong>en</strong> established with respect to IYCF practices for childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-23 months (PAHO/WHO,2003 and WHO, 2005).Table 11.7 pres<strong>en</strong>ts summary indicators of IYCF practices. The indicators take into accountthe perc<strong>en</strong>tages of childr<strong>en</strong> for whom feeding practices meet minimum standards with respect to fooddiversity (i.e., the number of food groups consumed) and feeding frequ<strong>en</strong>cy (i.e., the number of timesthe child was fed), as w<strong>el</strong>l the consumption of breast milk or other milks or milk products. Breastfedchildr<strong>en</strong> are considered as being fed with the minimum standards if they consume at least three foodgroups 1 and receive foods other than breast milk at least twice per day in the case of infants 6-8months and at least three times per day in the case of childr<strong>en</strong> 9-23 months. Non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>are considered to be fed in accordance with the minimum standards if they consumed milk or milkproducts and food from four or more food groups (including milk products), and are fed at least fourtimes per day.1 Food groups used in the assessm<strong>en</strong>t of minimum standard of feeding practices include: infant formula, milkother than breast milk, cheese, yogurt or other milk products; foods made from grains, roots, and tubersincluding porridge and fortified baby food from grains; fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin A; other fruits andvegetables; eggs; meat, poultry, fish, and sh<strong>el</strong>lfish (and organ meats); beans, peas, and nuts; and foods madewith oil, fat, or butter.152 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


Table 11.7 Infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practicesPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-23 months living with their mother who are fed according to three IYCF feeding practices based upon number of food groups and timesthey are fed during the day or night preceding the survey by breastfeeding status and background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic3+ foodgroups 1Among breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>6-23 months, perc<strong>en</strong>tage fed:Both 3+foodgroupsandMinimumummini-times or times ormore 2 moreNumberofbreastfedchildr<strong>en</strong>6-23monthsMilk ormilkproducts 3Among non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>6-23 months, perc<strong>en</strong>tage fed:4+ foodgroups4+ timesor moreWith 3IYCFpractices 4Numberof nonbreastfedchildr<strong>en</strong>6-23monthsBreastmilkormilkproducts 3Among all childr<strong>en</strong>6-23 months, perc<strong>en</strong>tage fed:3+ or4+ foodgroups 5Minimumtimes ormore 6Age in months6-8 42.7 73.2 37.1 320 * * * * 4 100.0 42.9 72.5 36.7 3249-11 60.5 65.9 46.2 254 * * * * 18 99.4 58.1 65.0 44.3 27212-17 60.9 65.0 43.8 432 68.7 38.6 37.9 21.2 82 95.0 57.4 60.7 40.2 51418-23 69.8 65.9 49.7 297 55.8 37.1 45.6 13.4 204 82.0 56.4 57.7 34.9 501SexMale 56.7 68.4 42.4 660 54.8 31.6 37.8 7.4 165 91.0 51.7 62.3 35.4 825Female 60.0 66.4 45.6 643 69.8 43.4 50.3 24.9 143 94.5 57.0 63.4 41.8 787Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 75.3 68.3 54.5 241 57.3 47.7 54.2 17.5 99 87.6 67.3 64.2 43.8 340Rural 54.5 67.2 41.6 1,062 63.9 32.1 38.6 14.6 209 94.1 50.8 62.5 37.1 1,272ProvinceNairobi 78.1 70.0 58.2 57 (85.5) (58.7) (61.5) (37.1) 30 95.0 71.4 67.0 50.9 88C<strong>en</strong>tral 81.9 66.2 54.1 93 (78.0) (71.8) (30.3) (13.4) 21 95.9 80.1 59.5 46.5 114Coast 47.9 60.5 28.0 132 (57.1) (23.9) (24.3) (8.5) 32 91.6 43.2 53.4 24.2 164Eastern 62.3 71.9 47.5 205 * * * * 23 98.3 61.4 70.3 45.5 228Nyanza 49.5 69.2 36.9 237 42.5 26.8 38.2 10.7 65 87.5 44.6 62.5 31.2 302Rift Valley 61.2 66.4 48.9 392 66.8 34.0 50.7 13.9 94 93.6 55.9 63.4 42.1 485Western 55.1 77.0 46.9 156 36.1 28.3 41.6 10.2 33 88.8 50.3 70.8 40.4 190North Eastern 18.9 17.3 10.2 32 (90.5) (29.3) (26.5) (13.4) 9 97.9 21.2 19.3 10.9 40Mother’s educationNo education 28.7 47.4 20.4 162 65.1 6.0 14.8 2.9 29 94.8 25.3 42.5 17.8 191Primary incomplete 48.9 65.3 35.8 438 53.5 34.1 41.4 14.2 93 91.9 46.3 61.1 32.0 530Primary complete 67.1 74.7 51.1 412 65.4 33.2 34.2 14.5 87 94.0 61.2 67.6 44.7 499Secondary+ 76.7 71.5 59.3 291 65.4 52.3 62.1 21.2 100 91.2 70.5 69.1 49.6 391Wealth quintileLowest 40.7 60.9 30.3 313 62.3 17.4 20.7 7.6 56 94.3 37.2 54.8 26.9 369Second 57.8 73.4 43.3 265 60.3 22.7 39.9 7.8 65 92.2 50.9 66.8 36.3 330Middle 53.8 68.1 41.0 244 62.8 42.4 45.7 21.6 42 94.6 52.2 64.8 38.1 286Fourth 69.9 68.8 54.3 245 58.5 29.8 40.2 15.5 50 93.0 63.1 63.9 47.8 295Highest 75.0 67.2 55.1 236 63.8 60.1 60.5 22.9 95 89.6 70.7 65.3 45.8 331Total 58.4 67.4 44.0 1,304 61.8 37.1 43.6 15.5 308 92.7 54.3 62.9 38.5 1,612With all3 IYCFpracticesNumberof allchildr<strong>en</strong>6-23monthsNote: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted childr<strong>en</strong>; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1 Food groups: a. infant formula, milk other than breast milk, cheese or yogurt or other milk products; b. foods made from grains, roots, and tubers, including porridge, fortifiedbaby food from grains; c. vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables (and red palm oil); d. other fruits and vegetables; e. eggs; f. meat, poultry, fish, and sh<strong>el</strong>lfish (and organ meats); g.legumes and nuts; h. foods made with oil, fat, butter.2 At least twice a day for breastfed infants 6-8 months and at least three times a day for breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> 9-23 months3 Includes commercial infant formula, fresh, tinned and powdered animal milk, and cheese, yogurt and other milk products4 Non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> ages 6-23 months are considered to be fed with a minimum standard of three Infant and Young Child Feeding practices if they receive other milk ormilk products and are fed at least the minimum number of times per day with at least the minimum number of food groups.5 3+ food groups for breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> and 4+ food groups for non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>6 Fed solid or semi-solid food at least twice a day for infants 6-8 months, 3+ times for other breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>, and 4+ times for non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>According to the results pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Table 11.7 and Figure 11.5, only 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of allchildr<strong>en</strong> age 6-23 months are fed in accordance with all IYCF practices. Although 93 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofchildr<strong>en</strong> receive either breast milk or other milk products and almost two-thirds are fed the minimumnumber of times, only slightly over half (54 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are fed from the requisite number of foodgroups.Breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be fed in accordance with IYCF practices thannon-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> (Figure 11.5). Forty-four perc<strong>en</strong>t of breastfed childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-23 months are fedfrom the appropriate number of food groups and fed the minimum number of times per day, comparedwith only 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t of non-breastfed childr<strong>en</strong>. Among both groups of childr<strong>en</strong>, providing a variety offoods from differ<strong>en</strong>t food groups seems to be more of a problem than providing food frequ<strong>en</strong>tlyduring the day. Increasing the diversity of foods giv<strong>en</strong> to childr<strong>en</strong> would h<strong>el</strong>p to meet the IYCFtargets.Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 153


Analysis of data by background characteristics indicates that there are large differ<strong>en</strong>ces bymother’s education and by wealth quintile in the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> who are fed according to theIYCF recomm<strong>en</strong>dations. For example, only 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have no educationare fed according to the recomm<strong>en</strong>ded practices, compared with 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those whose mothershave be<strong>en</strong> to secondary school. These findings suggest that there is need to acc<strong>el</strong>erate awar<strong>en</strong>essamong wom<strong>en</strong> with no education about optimum feeding practices for infants and young childr<strong>en</strong>. Atprovincial lev<strong>el</strong>, the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-23 months who are fed according to the IYCFpractices is lowest in North Eastern (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Coast provinces (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and highest inNairobi (51 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and C<strong>en</strong>tral province (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Figure 11.5 Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) Practices50Perc<strong>en</strong>t444039302016100Breastfed Non-breastfed TotalFed with all 3 IYCF practicesK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0911.7 MICRONUTRIENT INTAKE AMONG CHILDRENA serious contributor to childhood morbidity and mortality is micronutri<strong>en</strong>t defici<strong>en</strong>cy.Childr<strong>en</strong> can receive micronutri<strong>en</strong>ts from foods, food fortification, and direct supplem<strong>en</strong>tation. Table11.8 looks at measures r<strong>el</strong>ating to intake of several key micronutri<strong>en</strong>ts among childr<strong>en</strong>.Vitamin A is an ess<strong>en</strong>tial micronutri<strong>en</strong>t for the immune system and plays an important role inmaintaining the epith<strong>el</strong>ial tissue in the body. Severe vitamin A defici<strong>en</strong>cy (VAD) can cause eyedamage. VAD can also increase severity of infections such as measles and diarrhoeal diseases inchildr<strong>en</strong> and slow recovery from illness. Vitamin A is found in breast milk, other milks, liver, eggs,fish, butter, red palm oil, mangoes, papayas, carrots, pumpkins, and dark gre<strong>en</strong> leafy vegetables. Th<strong>el</strong>iver can store an adequate amount of the vitamin for four to six months. Periodic dosing (usuallyevery six months) of vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>ts is one method of <strong>en</strong>suring that childr<strong>en</strong> at risk do notdev<strong>el</strong>op VAD. The 2008-09 KDHS collected information on the consumption of foods rich in vitaminA.Table 11.8 shows that 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of youngest childr<strong>en</strong> aged 6-35 months consumed foods richin vitamin A the day or night preceding the survey. The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> consuming vitamin A-rich foods increases with age, from 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t at 6-8 months to 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t at 24-35 months. Atprovincial lev<strong>el</strong>, childr<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral (88 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Western (87 perc<strong>en</strong>t) provinces are the mostlik<strong>el</strong>y to consume vitamin A-rich foods and those in North Eastern province the least lik<strong>el</strong>y (27perc<strong>en</strong>t). Educational lev<strong>el</strong> of the mother is corr<strong>el</strong>ated with consumption of vitamin A-rich foods.Data show that only 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have no education are fed with vitamin A-rich foods, compared with 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> whose mothers have some secondary education.154 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


Table 11.8 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t intake among childr<strong>en</strong>Among youngest childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-35 months who are living with their mother, the perc<strong>en</strong>tages who consumed vitamin A-rich and iron-rich foods in the day or nightpreceding the survey, and among all childr<strong>en</strong> 6-59 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tages who were giv<strong>en</strong> vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>ts in the six months preceding the survey, whowere giv<strong>en</strong> iron supplem<strong>en</strong>ts in the last sev<strong>en</strong> days, and who were giv<strong>en</strong> deworming medication in the six months preceding the survey, and among all childr<strong>en</strong>age 6-59 months who live in households that were tested for iodized salt, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who live in households with adequat<strong>el</strong>y iodized salt, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong youngest childr<strong>en</strong> age6-35 months living with the mother: Among all childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-59 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho consumedfoods rich invitamin A in last24 hours 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho consumedfoods rich iniron inlast 24 hours 2Number ofchildr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagegiv<strong>en</strong>vitamin Asupplem<strong>en</strong>ts inlast 6 monthsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagegiv<strong>en</strong> ironsupplem<strong>en</strong>ts inlast 7 daysPerc<strong>en</strong>tagegiv<strong>en</strong>dewormingmedication inlast 6 months 3Number ofchildr<strong>en</strong>Among childr<strong>en</strong>age 6-59 months livingin households testedfor iodized salt:Perc<strong>en</strong>tag<strong>el</strong>iving in householdswithadequat<strong>el</strong>yiodized salt 4Number ofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age in months6-8 48.8 13.1 324 42.7 6.8 3.5 327 97.0 3159-11 70.5 18.2 272 60.8 4.5 6.9 279 98.0 26712-17 77.6 29.9 514 48.5 4.6 25.4 530 98.3 51118-23 86.0 35.4 501 33.8 5.0 43.9 566 98.0 55324-35 85.9 37.3 765 25.9 4.2 42.0 1,132 97.3 1,08636-47 na na 0 21.8 5.6 46.1 1,071 98.0 1,02048-59 na na 0 20.4 3.8 45.2 1,041 97.7 991SexMale 75.3 29.6 1,238 30.6 5.2 38.3 2,528 98.0 2,433Female 79.5 30.0 1,139 29.9 4.3 36.7 2,418 97.4 2,311Breastfeeding statusBreastfeeding 71.2 25.3 1,473 43.8 4.9 22.4 1,508 97.7 1,449Not breastfeeding 87.5 37.1 900 24.7 4.8 44.4 3,365 97.8 3,223Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 85.0 40.2 472 34.8 4.3 43.7 926 98.3 911Rural 75.4 27.2 1,904 29.2 4.9 36.1 4,020 97.6 3,833ProvinceNairobi 84.2 37.8 132 38.7 5.5 48.6 277 99.2 272C<strong>en</strong>tral 88.8 28.2 196 27.7 4.8 58.9 397 100.0 394Coast 74.4 28.5 219 38.3 3.0 29.2 425 96.7 408Eastern 80.3 25.4 371 25.5 1.7 33.2 752 92.3 699Nyanza 79.6 34.7 419 35.8 7.7 30.6 912 99.1 891Rift Valley 70.9 23.8 683 30.9 4.5 44.5 1,432 98.7 1,358Western 86.6 42.6 297 19.8 4.1 27.0 605 98.9 587North Eastern 26.9 20.5 60 25.6 10.6 22.4 147 94.8 135Mother’s educationNo education 43.8 15.1 271 27.4 4.6 23.0 636 94.6 550Primary incomplete 77.4 27.0 810 26.4 4.3 29.2 1,643 97.6 1,570Primary complete 82.4 30.8 714 32.4 4.7 43.3 1,505 98.3 1,476Secondary+ 86.7 39.5 581 34.5 5.5 49.7 1,163 98.7 1,148Mother’s age at birth15-19 69.9 27.9 183 34.1 4.7 26.2 224 98.1 21720-29 76.7 31.7 1,312 30.2 5.2 37.1 2,769 97.9 2,65730-39 80.1 28.1 739 31.2 4.6 38.9 1,612 97.1 1,54140-49 78.3 23.4 142 23.7 2.1 41.4 342 99.3 327Wealth quintileLowest 60.8 20.0 538 28.0 3.9 29.2 1,187 96.7 1,093Second 79.1 29.7 501 30.2 4.6 35.2 1,015 97.3 962Middle 80.6 29.4 455 28.8 4.7 39.4 913 97.8 887Fourth 83.8 33.3 415 30.6 4.5 39.0 893 98.3 875Highest 85.6 38.5 467 34.4 6.3 47.3 937 98.8 926Total 77.3 29.8 2,376 30.3 4.8 37.5 4,946 97.7 4,743Note: Information on vitamin A and iron supplem<strong>en</strong>ts and deworming medication is based on the mother’s recall. Total includes childr<strong>en</strong> missing information as tobreastfeeding status.na = Not applicable1Includes meat (and organ meat), fish, poultry, eggs, pumpkin, y<strong>el</strong>low yams, butternut squash, carrots, y<strong>el</strong>low sweet potatoes, gre<strong>en</strong> leafy vegetables, mango,papaya, and guava.2Includes meat (including organ meat)3Deworming for intestinal parasites is commonly done for h<strong>el</strong>minthes and for schistosomiasis.4Salt containing 15 parts per million of iodine or more. Excludes childr<strong>en</strong> in households in which salt was not tested.Iron is ess<strong>en</strong>tial for cognitive dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. Low iron intake can also contribute to anaemia.Iron requirem<strong>en</strong>ts are greatest betwe<strong>en</strong> the ages of 6-11 months, wh<strong>en</strong> growth is extrem<strong>el</strong>y rapid.Survey data indicate that the consumption of iron-rich foods has a similar pattern to that for vitaminA-rich foods although the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> fed iron-rich foods is lower (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Theconsumption of iron-rich foods is higher in urban areas (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than rural areas (27 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong> | 155


Childr<strong>en</strong> in Western province (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to consume iron-rich foods while those inNorth Eastern province are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y (21 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The data also show that childr<strong>en</strong> whosemothers have no education (15 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are far less lik<strong>el</strong>y to consume iron-rich foods than thosewhose mothers have at least some secondary education (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t).The 2008-09 KDHS also collected data on vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>tation and ironsupplem<strong>en</strong>tation for childr<strong>en</strong> under five. According to Table 11.8, 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-59months were giv<strong>en</strong> vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>ts in the six months before the survey. G<strong>en</strong>erally, theproportion of childr<strong>en</strong> receiving vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>tation is higher among childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-17months, with those age 9-11 months being most lik<strong>el</strong>y to have received the supplem<strong>en</strong>ts (60 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Childr<strong>en</strong> who are still breastfeeding (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be giv<strong>en</strong> vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>tsthan those who are not breastfeeding (25 perc<strong>en</strong>t). At provincial lev<strong>el</strong>, the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong>receiving vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>ts is lowest in Western province (20 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Survey data on iron supplem<strong>en</strong>tation indicate it is g<strong>en</strong>erally low (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and does not varysubstantially with background characteristics. It is however worth noting that the proportion ofchildr<strong>en</strong> receiving iron supplem<strong>en</strong>tation in the sev<strong>en</strong> days before the survey is highest at 6-8 months(7 perc<strong>en</strong>t), a critical period for infants’ growth. At provincial lev<strong>el</strong>, childr<strong>en</strong> in North Easternprovince (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be giv<strong>en</strong> iron supplem<strong>en</strong>ts. This is critical giv<strong>en</strong> that a lowerproportion of childr<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province consume this iron-rich food, as indicated above.Certain types of intestinal parasites can cause anaemia. Periodic deworming for organismslike h<strong>el</strong>minthes and schistosomiasis (bilharzia) can improve childr<strong>en</strong>’s micronutri<strong>en</strong>t status. As shownin Table 11.8, almost four in t<strong>en</strong> childr<strong>en</strong> age 6-59 months received deworming medication in the sixmonths before the survey. Older childr<strong>en</strong>, urban childr<strong>en</strong>, and those in C<strong>en</strong>tral province and Nairobiwere more lik<strong>el</strong>y than other childr<strong>en</strong> to have be<strong>en</strong> giv<strong>en</strong> deworming medication. The lik<strong>el</strong>ihood ofreceiving deworming treatm<strong>en</strong>t also increases with the education of the mother, the age of the motherat birth, and the wealth quintile.Inadequate amounts of iodine in the diet are r<strong>el</strong>ated to serious health risks for young childr<strong>en</strong>.The survey results show that nearly all childr<strong>en</strong> (98 perc<strong>en</strong>t) live in households with adequat<strong>el</strong>yiodized salt. There is no significant differ<strong>en</strong>ce by background characteristics.As shown in Table 11.9, survey teams managed to test salt in 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households.Results show that nearly all households in K<strong>en</strong>ya (98 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are consuming salt with an adequat<strong>el</strong>ev<strong>el</strong> of iodine. Analysis of the data shows that there are no significant differ<strong>en</strong>ces in possession ofiodized salt by background characteristics, except that a lower proportion of households in Easternprovince (93 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have adequat<strong>el</strong>y iodized salt.156 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


Table 11.9 Pres<strong>en</strong>ce of iodized salt in householdAmong all households, perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households tested for iodine cont<strong>en</strong>t and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households with no salt; andamong households with salt tested, the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution by lev<strong>el</strong> of iodine in salt (parts per million or ppm), according tobackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith salttestedAmong all householdsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith no saltNumber ofhouseholdsNone(0 ppm)Among households with tested salt,the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution by iodine cont<strong>en</strong>t of saltInadequate(


Table 11.10 Nutritional status of wom<strong>en</strong>Among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage with height under 145 cm, mean body mass index (BMI), and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage with specific BMI lev<strong>el</strong>s, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageb<strong>el</strong>ow145 cmHeight Body mass index 1Numberofwom<strong>en</strong>Meanbody massindex(BMI)18.5-24.9(Totalnormal)


Table 11.11 Micronutri<strong>en</strong>t intake among mothersAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with a child born in the last five years, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who received a vitamin A dose in the first two months after the birth of the last child;among mothers age 15-49 who during the pregnancy of the last child born in the five years prior to the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who suffered from night blindness, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage who took iron tablets or syrup for specific numbers of days, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took deworming medication; and among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with achild born in the last five years who live in households that were tested for iodized salt, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who live in households with adequat<strong>el</strong>y iodized salt, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewhoreceivedvitamin Adose postpartum1NightblindnessreportedNightblindnessadjusted 2Number of days wom<strong>en</strong> took iron tablets orsyrup during pregnancy of last birthNone


took them for less than 60 days during the pregnancy. Wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province and thosewith less education are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to take iron tablets during pregnancy.Fewer than one in five wom<strong>en</strong> reported having tak<strong>en</strong> deworming medication during thepregnancy of their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth. Wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province and in Nairobi are the leastlik<strong>el</strong>y to take deworming medicine.With regard to iodine, the survey results show that 98 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who had a birth inthe five years before the survey live in households with adequat<strong>el</strong>y iodized salt. This proportion varieslittle by background characteristics, implying that intake of iodine is nearly universal.In summary, it is evid<strong>en</strong>t that the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> receiving micronutri<strong>en</strong>tsupplem<strong>en</strong>tation has increased considerably over the last five years. There is need to sustain this tr<strong>en</strong>din order to further reduce defici<strong>en</strong>cies of these crucial micronutri<strong>en</strong>ts among wom<strong>en</strong> and childr<strong>en</strong>.160 | Nutrition of Wom<strong>en</strong> and Childr<strong>en</strong>


MALARIA 12Robert C.B. Buluma, Ayub Manya, and Diana Kamar12.1 INTRODUCTIONMalaria is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in K<strong>en</strong>ya, with close to 70 perc<strong>en</strong>t (24million) of the population at risk of infection (Ministry of Health, n.d.). Although malaria affectspeople of all age groups, childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age and pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> living in malaria<strong>en</strong>demic regions are most vulnerable. The human toll that malaria exacts and the economic and socialimpacts are devastating: sick childr<strong>en</strong> miss school, working days are lost, and tourism suffers. Malariabecomes a s<strong>el</strong>f-perpetuating problem, where the disease prev<strong>en</strong>ts growth of the human and economiccapital necessary to bring the disease under control. Moreover, malaria disproportionat<strong>el</strong>y affects therural poor who can neither afford insecticide-treated bed nets for prev<strong>en</strong>tion nor access appropriatetreatm<strong>en</strong>t wh<strong>en</strong> they fall sick.The K<strong>en</strong>ya Vision 2030 goal for the health sector is to provide equitable, affordable, qualityhealth services to all K<strong>en</strong>yans. The goal also aims to restructure the health care d<strong>el</strong>ivery system toshift the emphasis from curative to prev<strong>en</strong>tive health care. The goal of the second National HealthSector Strategic Plan (NHSSP II 2005–2010) is to ‘reduce health inequalities and to reverse thedownward tr<strong>en</strong>d in health-r<strong>el</strong>ated outcome and impact indicators’ (Ministry of Health, 2004).Malaria prev<strong>en</strong>tion and control activities in K<strong>en</strong>ya are guided by the National MalariaStrategy (NMS) and the National Health Sector Strategic Plan 2005-2010. The NMS outlines malariacontrol activities based on the epidemiology of malaria in K<strong>en</strong>ya. The strategy aims to achiev<strong>en</strong>ational and international malaria control targets. The core interv<strong>en</strong>tions adopted in K<strong>en</strong>ya are thefollowing:• Vector control—using insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS)• Case managem<strong>en</strong>t (using Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) and improvedlaboratory diagnosis)• Managem<strong>en</strong>t of malaria in pregnancy• Epidemic preparedness and response• Cross-cutting strategies including information, education, and communication (IEC) forbehaviour change, as w<strong>el</strong>l as effective monitoring and evaluationThe implem<strong>en</strong>tation of these strategies was expected to reduce the lev<strong>el</strong> of malaria infectionand consequ<strong>en</strong>t death in K<strong>en</strong>ya by 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t by the year 2006 and sustain that improved lev<strong>el</strong> ofcontrol until 2010. The strategic plan is in line with the Ministry of Health’s vision to transformK<strong>en</strong>ya into ‘a nation free from prev<strong>en</strong>table diseases and ill health’. It is also in line with the overallplans for realizing the targets set out in Vision 2030 for the health sector as w<strong>el</strong>l as the global malariatargets on universal coverage and access. Malaria control is not just a health issue; it is an overalldev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t issue as malaria is a driver of poverty.Malaria | 161


12.2 HOUSEHOLD OWNERSHIP OF MOSQUITO NETSUntreated nets and window scre<strong>en</strong>ing have long be<strong>en</strong> considered useful protection methodsagainst mosquitoes and other insects (Lindsay and Gibson, 1988). Nets reduce the human-vectorcontact by acting as a physical barrier and thus reducing the number of bites from infective vectors(Bradley et al., 1986). However, nets and scre<strong>en</strong>s are oft<strong>en</strong> not w<strong>el</strong>l fitted or are torn, thus allowingmosquitoes to <strong>en</strong>ter or feed on the part of the body adjac<strong>en</strong>t to the netting fabric during the night(Lines et al., 1987). The problem of ill-used nets and scre<strong>en</strong>s provides one of the motives forimpregnating them with a fast-acting insecticide that will rep<strong>el</strong> or kill mosquitoes before or shortlyafter feeding (Lines et al., 1987; Hossan and Curtis, 1989).Over the past three decades, significant advances have be<strong>en</strong> made in the prev<strong>en</strong>tion of malariausing ITNs and curtains. The treatm<strong>en</strong>t of nets has be<strong>en</strong> made possible by the availability of syntheticpyrethroids which mimic the insecticidal compounds of the natural pyrethrum. They have lowmammalian toxicity, are rep<strong>el</strong>l<strong>en</strong>t, highly toxic to mosquitoes, and odourless, and have low volatilitywith consequ<strong>en</strong>t long persist<strong>en</strong>ce. Their dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t has led to treatm<strong>en</strong>t of nets as a method ofvector control. The use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) has be<strong>en</strong> shown to be an effective method ofreducing severe malaria and wh<strong>en</strong> used by all or most members of the community may reduce malariatransmission.Scaling up the use of ITNs and protecting 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> under five and pregnantwom<strong>en</strong> against malaria in Africa by the year 2010 is one of the targets set at the Abuja summit byAfrican Heads of State in 2000. In an effort to scale up the use of ITNs, differ<strong>en</strong>t mechanisms ofd<strong>el</strong>ivering ITNs to vulnerable groups have be<strong>en</strong> used in K<strong>en</strong>ya. D<strong>el</strong>ivery mechanisms used includeroutine clinic d<strong>el</strong>ivery, mass campaigns, retail social marketing, and the commercial sector.The 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) household questionnaireincluded questions on net ownership and re-treatm<strong>en</strong>t practices. Table 12.1 provides information onthe perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households that have a net and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage that have an ITN, according toresid<strong>en</strong>ce, province, and the wealth index.The survey shows that 61 perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan households own at least one net of any kind, and36 perc<strong>en</strong>t own more than one net. This compares w<strong>el</strong>l with data from the 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya MalariaIndicator Survey (KMIS) showing that 63 and 34 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households own at least one net and morethan one net respectiv<strong>el</strong>y (Division of Malaria Control, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation,2009) 1 .The country has witnessed an impressive rise in household ownership of ITNs. The 2008-09KDHS shows that 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households have at least one ITN, up from 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded in the2007 KMIS and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t recorded in the 2003 KDHS (Figure 12.1). Similarly, 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofhouseholds own more than one ITN compared with 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007 and only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003.The 2008-09 KDHS indicates that households in urban areas are slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y to ownan ITN (58 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than those in rural areas (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t). There are greater variations in ownership ofITNs regionally. Whereas 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of households in Nyanza province own at least one ITN, only 33perc<strong>en</strong>t of households in C<strong>en</strong>tral province do so. Like the 2007 KMIS, the 2008-09 KDHS shows thatownership of at least one ITN is r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y constant across the top four wealth quintiles (ranging from55 to 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t), but considerably lower for the lowest wealth quintile (49 perc<strong>en</strong>t).1 The KMIS sample was focused on malaria <strong>en</strong>demic and epidemic-prone areas. Since the KDHS covered the<strong>en</strong>tire country—including areas at low or no risk for malaria where net ownership is lik<strong>el</strong>y to be very low—comparison of the two surveys underestimates the increase in net ownership in the malaria-prone areas. A separateanalysis is planned to investigate tr<strong>en</strong>ds over time for the malaria-prone areas only.162 | Malaria


Table 12.1 Ownership of mosquito netsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of households with at least one and more than one mosquito net (treated or untreated), ever-treated mosquito net and insecticidetreatednet (ITN), and the average number of nets per household, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith atleast oneAny type of mosquito net Ever-treated mosquito net 1 mosquito nets (ITNs) 2Insecticide-treatedPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith morethan oneAverag<strong>en</strong>umber ofnets perhouseholdPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith atleast onePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith morethan oneAverag<strong>en</strong>umber ofever-treatednets perhouseholdPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith atleast onePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith morethan oneAverag<strong>en</strong>umber ofITNs perhouseholdNumber ofhouseholdsResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 64.4 36.2 1.2 64.0 35.8 1.2 57.8 31.1 1.1 2,350Rural 59.5 35.8 1.2 59.3 35.5 1.2 55.0 32.6 1.1 6,707ProvinceNairobi 60.1 30.1 1.1 59.4 29.7 1.1 50.8 25.5 0.9 801C<strong>en</strong>tral 38.1 23.4 0.8 38.0 23.3 0.8 32.7 19.7 0.6 1,079Coast 70.9 43.4 1.4 70.5 43.0 1.4 66.3 38.2 1.3 755Eastern 66.3 39.3 1.3 66.0 38.4 1.2 60.4 34.4 1.1 1,512Nyanza 81.8 52.9 1.7 81.5 52.6 1.7 76.5 48.9 1.6 1,411Rift Valley 45.4 22.9 0.8 45.3 22.9 0.8 41.4 20.8 0.7 2,363Western 74.3 47.2 1.5 74.2 47.0 1.5 71.4 44.3 1.4 937North Eastern 76.8 53.1 1.5 76.4 52.9 1.5 73.3 49.1 1.4 199Wealth quintileLowest 52.6 25.4 0.9 52.4 25.2 0.9 49.4 23.2 0.8 1,489Second 63.0 37.8 1.2 62.9 37.7 1.2 58.1 34.7 1.1 1,569Middle 64.4 40.4 1.3 63.7 39.5 1.2 60.2 36.2 1.1 1,646Fourth 59.0 38.9 1.3 58.9 38.8 1.3 54.7 36.2 1.2 1,845Highest 63.3 35.8 1.2 62.9 35.6 1.2 55.9 30.5 1.1 2,509Total 60.8 35.9 1.2 60.5 35.6 1.2 55.7 32.2 1.1 9,0571An ever-treated net is a long-lasting net or a conv<strong>en</strong>tional net, which was either pretreated or was soaked with insecticide at any time.2An insecticide-treated net (ITN) is (1) a factory treated net that does not require any further treatm<strong>en</strong>t (long-lasting net), (2) a pretreated netobtained within the past 12 months, or (3) a conv<strong>en</strong>tional net that has be<strong>en</strong> soaked with insecticide within the past 12 months.Figure 12.1 Ownership of Mosquito Nets, 2003-20097060Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of households636156504840302010221034366323320Ownershipof at leastone netOwnershipof more thanone netOwnershipof at leastone ITNOwnershipof more thanone ITNOwnership of nets2003 KDHS 2007 KMIS* 2008-09 KDHS* The data from the 2007 KMIS refer to malaria-prone areas only and exclude Nairobi province; Kiambu, Nyandarua, andNyeri districts in C<strong>en</strong>tral province; Meru district in C<strong>en</strong>tral province; and Laikipia district in Rift Valley province.Malaria | 163


12.3 USE OF MOSQUITO NETSConsiderable effort has be<strong>en</strong> invested in the procurem<strong>en</strong>t and distribution of ITNs for malariacontrol in K<strong>en</strong>ya. By the <strong>en</strong>d of 2008, an estimated 16 million nets had be<strong>en</strong> docum<strong>en</strong>ted asdistributed in K<strong>en</strong>ya through multiple chann<strong>el</strong>s since 2002, targeting childr<strong>en</strong> under five and pregnantwom<strong>en</strong>. Although the distribution of these nets was accompanied by advocacy messages that advisedpeople to sleep under these nets, a discrepancy still exists betwe<strong>en</strong> ownership and use of the mosquitonets. The 2008-09 KDHS collected information on usage of ITNs by childr<strong>en</strong> under five and pregnantwom<strong>en</strong>.Age is an important factor in determination of lev<strong>el</strong>s of acquired immunity against malaria.For the first six months of life, antibodies acquired from the mother during pregnancy protect childr<strong>en</strong>born in areas <strong>en</strong>demic for malaria. This protection is gradually lost as childr<strong>en</strong> start to dev<strong>el</strong>op theirown immunity over a period of time. The lev<strong>el</strong> of immunity dev<strong>el</strong>oped dep<strong>en</strong>ds on the lev<strong>el</strong> ofexposure to malaria infection, but it is b<strong>el</strong>ieved that in highly malaria-<strong>en</strong>demic areas, childr<strong>en</strong> areimmune by the fifth birthday. Such childr<strong>en</strong> no longer suffer from severe life-threat<strong>en</strong>ing malaria.Immunity in areas of low malaria transmission is acquired more slowly, and malarial illness affects allmembers of the community regardless of age. The governm<strong>en</strong>t recognises childr<strong>en</strong> under five years ofage as a risk group and recomm<strong>en</strong>ds that this group be protected by sleeping under insecticide-treatednets. In 2008, the national target for the proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> under five sleeping under an ITN was80 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Table 12.2 and Figure 12.2 show information on use of any nets and ITNs by childr<strong>en</strong> underfive years of age. The data in the figure show that over half of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five slept under anet the night prior to the survey in 2008-09 compared with only 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 2 . Similarly, justunder half of childr<strong>en</strong> (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) slept under an ITN in 2008-09 compared with only 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2003 and 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007.The results in Table 12.2 show that use of nets by childr<strong>en</strong> under five decreases with increasein age. Fifty-six perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ow one year slept under an ITN the night before the surveycompared with only 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age four years. The survey further shows that childr<strong>en</strong> inurban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use nets than their counterparts in rural areas. Regionally, childr<strong>en</strong> inRift Valley province are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to use mosquito nets than their counterparts in other provinces.The data indicate that the use of mosquito nets by childr<strong>en</strong> r<strong>el</strong>ates to the lev<strong>el</strong> of wealth. Childr<strong>en</strong>from poor households are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to use mosquito nets compared with those from financially<strong>en</strong>dowed households.2 Timing of the survey can affect bednet use. Data collection for the 2003 KDHS took place from mid-April tomid-September, <strong>en</strong>compassing the long rainy season and also the colder months of July and August. Data collectionfor the 2008-09 KDHS took place from mid-November 2008 to late February 2009.164 | Malaria


Table 12.2 Use of mosquito nets by childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years of age who slept under a mosquitonet (treated or untreated), an ever-treated mosquito net, and an insecticide-treatednet (ITN) the night before the survey, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho sleptunder anynet last nightPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho sleptunder anever-treatednet last night 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho sleptunder anITN lastnight 2Number ofchildr<strong>en</strong>Age in years


Pregnancy leads to immuno-depression. In malaria <strong>en</strong>demic areas, adults acquire someimmunity, which protects them from malaria infection. However, pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>, especially those intheir first pregnancies, have a higher risk of malaria infection. Sometimes these malaria infectionsremain asymptomatic but lead to dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t of malaria-induced anaemia. Asymptomatic malariainfection also interferes with the maternal-foetal exchange, leading to low birth weight infants. Toreduce the risk of malaria infection during pregnancy, the National Malaria Strategy target is for 60perc<strong>en</strong>t of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> to sleep under ITNs.The 2008-09 KDHS collected information on use of nets by wom<strong>en</strong>. Table 12.3 and Figure12.3 show the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> and of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> who slept under mosquito nets the nightbefore the survey. There has be<strong>en</strong> consist<strong>en</strong>t improvem<strong>en</strong>t in use of mosquito nets by wom<strong>en</strong> as notedfrom the 2003 KDHS to 2008-09 KDHS. For example, the proportion of all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 thatslept under any net the night before the survey increased from 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 45 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2008-09. Similarly, the proportion of all wom<strong>en</strong> who slept under an ITN increased from 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2003 to 41 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.The results also show a great increase in use of mosquito nets by pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49.In 2003, only 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> slept under any mosquito net compared with 53 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2008-09. Similarly in 2003, only 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> slept under an ITN compared with49 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Table 12.3 Use of mosquito nets by wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who slept under a mosquito net (treated or untreated),an ever-treated mosquito net, and an insecticide-treated net (ITN) the night before the survey, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicSlept underany netlast nightPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 whoSlept underan evertreatednetlast night 1Slept underan ITNlast night 2Numberofwom<strong>en</strong>Slept underany netlast nightPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 whoSlept underan evertreatednetlast night 1Slept underan ITNlast night 2Numberofwom<strong>en</strong>Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 52.0 51.6 46.9 2,244 54.8 54.8 50.9 146Rural 42.6 42.4 39.1 6,605 51.7 51.7 48.4 455ProvinceNairobi 53.1 52.7 47.7 758 (57.8) (57.8) (45.8) 40C<strong>en</strong>tral 27.0 26.7 23.2 953 31.2 31.2 26.1 45Coast 53.4 53.2 49.3 709 68.2 68.2 64.0 54Eastern 46.9 46.4 42.8 1,444 53.6 53.6 53.6 90Nyanza 62.9 62.5 58.4 1,456 62.6 62.6 57.6 114Rift Valley 28.5 28.5 25.6 2,361 31.8 31.8 29.5 154Western 58.0 57.7 54.2 974 71.7 71.7 69.3 84North Eastern 56.3 56.3 52.7 195 62.2 62.2 60.6 21EducationNo education 38.6 38.4 36.1 809 47.6 47.6 44.7 76Primary incomplete 41.1 40.8 37.2 2,642 53.9 53.9 51.1 202Primary complete 44.5 44.3 40.8 2,377 52.3 52.3 46.8 177Secondary+ 50.4 50.1 46.0 3,014 53.2 53.2 51.0 147Wealth quintileLowest 35.2 35.1 32.4 1,465 51.6 51.6 46.3 141Second 42.3 41.9 39.2 1,559 53.9 53.9 51.3 111Middle 46.1 45.7 43.0 1,682 48.8 48.8 47.9 113Fourth 45.0 44.9 41.4 1,820 62.4 62.4 61.1 90Highest 52.1 51.8 46.2 2,323 48.8 48.8 43.3 146Total 45.0 44.7 41.1 8,849 52.5 52.5 49.0 601Note: Total includes 6 wom<strong>en</strong> for whom education is missing. Numbers in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweightedcases.1An ever-treated net is a long-lasting net or a conv<strong>en</strong>tional net that was either pretreated or was soaked with insecticideat any time.2An insecticide-treated net (ITN) is (1) a factory treated net that does not require any further treatm<strong>en</strong>t (long-lasting net)or (2) a pretreated net obtained within the past 12 months, or (3) a conv<strong>en</strong>tional net that has be<strong>en</strong> soaked with insecticidewithin the past 12 months.166 | Malaria


Figure 12.3 Use of Mosquito Nets by Wom<strong>en</strong> Age 15-4960504030Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49454532415153404920161310540Slept underany netSlept underan ITNSlept underany netSlept underan ITNAll Wom<strong>en</strong>Pregnant Wom<strong>en</strong>2003 KDHS 2007 KMIS* 2008-09 KDHS* The data from the 2007 KMIS are not for K<strong>en</strong>ya as a whole but for malaria-prone areas only and exclude Nairobiprovince; Kiambu, Nyandarua, and Nyeri districts in C<strong>en</strong>tral province; Meru district in C<strong>en</strong>tral province; and Laikipiadistrict in Rift Valley province.Regarding differ<strong>en</strong>tials, the results show that wom<strong>en</strong> of reproductive age in urban areas aresomewhat more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use mosquito nets than their rural counterparts. Regionally, wom<strong>en</strong> inC<strong>en</strong>tral and Rift Valley provinces are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to use mosquito nets than their counterparts in otherprovinces. The lev<strong>el</strong> of education plays a major role in use of mosquito nets by wom<strong>en</strong> ofreproductive age. For instance, only 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> with no education slept under any netthe night before the survey compared with 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with secondary education. Similarly, 48perc<strong>en</strong>t of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> with no education used mosquito nets the previous night compared to 53perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with secondary education. The same pattern is noted for use of ITNs.12.4 INTERMITTENT PREVENTIVE TREATMENT OF MALARIA IN PREGNANCYThe governm<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>ya’s policy on intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tive treatm<strong>en</strong>t (IPT) states that allpregnant wom<strong>en</strong> living in malaria <strong>en</strong>demic areas should receive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) forprev<strong>en</strong>tion of malaria in pregnancy. The first dose should be giv<strong>en</strong> at 16 weeks of gestation andsubsequ<strong>en</strong>t doses administered with each scheduled visit as long as they are one month apart. In the2008-09 KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong> who had a live birth in the five years preceding the survey were asked if theyhad tak<strong>en</strong> any drugs to prev<strong>en</strong>t them from getting malaria during the pregnancy for their most rec<strong>en</strong>tbirth, and if yes, which drugs. If they had tak<strong>en</strong> SP, they were further asked how many times theytook it and whether they had received it during an ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visit. In this context, IPT is definedas the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who had a live birth in the two years before the survey who received twoor more doses of SP/Fansidar during pregnancy, at least one of which was received during anant<strong>en</strong>atal care visit.Table 12.4 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who took antimalarial drugs for prev<strong>en</strong>tion duringpregnancy and those who received IPT. Almost twice the proportion (42 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> took anyantimalarial drugs during pregnancy in 2008-09 compared with 2003 (23 perc<strong>en</strong>t) 3 . The proportion ofwom<strong>en</strong> who received IPT increased from 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09; 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> received at least one dose of SP/Fansidar, which at least provides some protection.Despite the fact that the burd<strong>en</strong> of malaria is greater in rural areas than in urban areas, the2008-09 KDHS found that pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> in rural areas are slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y to take any type ofantimalarial drugs (42 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than their urban counterparts (39 perc<strong>en</strong>t), but are slightly less lik<strong>el</strong>y3 These figures differ slightly from those in the 2003 KDHS report, which were based on wom<strong>en</strong> who had abirth in the five years before the survey.Malaria | 167


to receive IPT. Nairobi province has the lowest proportion of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> who took anyantimalarial drugs (25 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and who received any SP during an ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visit (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t)compared with the other provinces. This could be attributed to the fact that Nairobi is a malaria-freezone.The results indicate that pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> with no education are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to take anyantimalarial drugs for prev<strong>en</strong>tion or to receive IPT than those with some lev<strong>el</strong> of education. Only 6perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education received IPT, compared with 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with at leastsome secondary schooling. The data further indicate that poverty is a major hindrance to takingantimalarial drugs during pregnancy.Table 12.4 Prophylactic use of antimalarial drugs and use of intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tive treatm<strong>en</strong>t (IPT) bywom<strong>en</strong> during pregnancyPerc<strong>en</strong>tages of wom<strong>en</strong> who took any antimalarial drugs for prev<strong>en</strong>tion, who took SP/Fansidar, and whoreceived intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tive treatm<strong>en</strong>t (IPT) during the pregnancy for their last live birth in the twoyears preceding the survey, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookany antimalarialdrugPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookanySP/FansidarPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho took2+ doses ofSP/FansidarPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedanySP/Fansidarduring anANC visitPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedIPT 1Numberofwom<strong>en</strong>Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 39.2 34.7 16.7 32.9 15.5 457Rural 42.0 35.7 14.7 33.7 13.6 1,806ProvinceNairobi 24.6 20.6 11.3 19.0 10.2 136C<strong>en</strong>tral 43.6 38.6 16.2 37.8 16.2 168Coast 39.6 32.5 13.6 31.4 12.9 211Eastern 42.2 39.2 15.3 37.6 15.3 334Nyanza 44.1 35.1 19.1 32.7 17.2 452Rift Valley 37.2 33.0 13.1 31.5 12.5 647Western 54.2 44.8 16.2 41.4 12.9 254North Eastern 48.6 42.6 11.6 34.7 10.0 62EducationNo education 33.1 27.1 7.0 24.8 6.1 272Primary incomplete 37.2 30.8 13.3 28.2 12.1 739Primary complete 42.9 37.9 16.4 36.8 15.7 693Secondary+ 49.4 43.0 19.8 40.8 18.2 560Wealth quintileLowest 32.7 27.7 12.0 25.3 11.3 543Second 42.6 36.6 15.4 34.7 14.3 445Middle 48.6 42.1 16.7 39.6 15.2 404Fourth 44.9 37.4 16.1 35.0 14.3 412Highest 41.3 36.2 16.0 35.6 15.7 459Total 41.5 35.5 15.1 33.6 14.0 2,2641IPT: Intermitt<strong>en</strong>t prev<strong>en</strong>tive treatm<strong>en</strong>t , that is, treatm<strong>en</strong>t with two or more doses of SP/Fansidar, atleast one during an ant<strong>en</strong>atal care (ANC) visit.12.5 MALARIA CASE MANAGEMENT AMONG CHILDRENMost malarial fevers and convulsions occur at home. Prompt and effective managem<strong>en</strong>t ofmalaria cases is, therefore, important for malaria control across all the epidemiological zones of thecountry. Following reported drug resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the governm<strong>en</strong>t ofK<strong>en</strong>ya in 2006 rolled out the use of artemisinin-based combined therapies (ACTs) for treatm<strong>en</strong>t ofuncomplicated malaria. The ACT adopted for K<strong>en</strong>ya was artemether-lumefantrine (AL). The targetfor case managem<strong>en</strong>t of malaria is for 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t of fever cases to receive appropriate malariatreatm<strong>en</strong>t within 24 hours of onset of fever.The 2008-09 KDHS asked mothers whether their childr<strong>en</strong> under five years had had a fever inthe two weeks preceding the survey and if so, whether any treatm<strong>en</strong>t was sought. Questions were alsoasked about the types of drugs giv<strong>en</strong> to the child and how soon and for how long the drugs were168 | Malaria


tak<strong>en</strong>. Table 12.5 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five who had fever in the two weekspreceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of such childr<strong>en</strong> who took antimalarial drugs, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho took drugs on the same or next day following the onset of the fever.The proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> under five with fever in the two weeks preceding the surveydecreased from 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The survey further shows that amongchildr<strong>en</strong> under five with fever, only 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t took antimalarial drugs compared with 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2003. The proportion of those who took antimalarial drugs on the same day or next day remainedsteady at around 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t.Table 12.5 Preval<strong>en</strong>ce and prompt treatm<strong>en</strong>t of feverPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under age five with fever in the two weeks preceding the survey,and among childr<strong>en</strong> with fever, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took antimalarial drugs andthe perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took the drugs the same or next day following the onset of fever,by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAmong childr<strong>en</strong> underage five:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewith fever inthe twoweeks precedingthesurveyNumberof childr<strong>en</strong>Among childr<strong>en</strong>under age five with fever:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookantimalarialdrugsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho tookantimalarialdrugs sameor next dayNumberof childr<strong>en</strong>Age (in months)


Table 12.6 pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on types of antimalarial drugs giv<strong>en</strong> to childr<strong>en</strong> with feverand the proportion who took the first-line drug (ACT) and the second-line drug (SP) on the same orthe next day after the onset of the illness. In interpreting the data, it is important to remember that theinformation is based on reports from the mothers of the ill childr<strong>en</strong>. Many mothers may not haveknown the specific drug giv<strong>en</strong> to the child.Overall, 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t of childr<strong>en</strong> with fever took ACT, and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t took SP/Fansidar. Only 4perc<strong>en</strong>t of the childr<strong>en</strong> took ACT, and 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t took SP/Fansidar on the same day or the next dayafter the onset of the fever. A sizable proportion of childr<strong>en</strong> still are being giv<strong>en</strong> amodiaquine (8perc<strong>en</strong>t) for treatm<strong>en</strong>t of fever, though it is neither a first- nor a second-line drug.Table 12.6 Type and timing of antimalarial drugsAmong childr<strong>en</strong> under age five with fever in the two weeks preceding the survey, perc<strong>en</strong>tage who took specific antimalarial drugs and perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho took each type of drug the same or next day after dev<strong>el</strong>oping the fever, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicSP/FansidarPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> who took drug:ChloroquineAmodiaquineQuinine ACTSP/FansidarPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> who took drugthe same or next day:OtherantimalarialChloroquineAmodiaquineQuinine ACTOtherantimalarialNumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong>with feverAge (in months)


Table 12.7 pres<strong>en</strong>ts data on the availabilityof antimalarial drugs at home wh<strong>en</strong> the childbecame ill with fever. Among childr<strong>en</strong> whoreceived antimalarial drugs in the two weeksbefore the survey, 18 perc<strong>en</strong>t had the drugs athome wh<strong>en</strong> they became ill with fever.Table 12.7 Availability at home of antimalarial drugs tak<strong>en</strong>by childr<strong>en</strong> with feverAmong childr<strong>en</strong> under age five who had fever in the twoweeks preceding the survey and who took specific antimalarialdrugs, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage for whom the drug was at homewh<strong>en</strong> the child became ill with fever, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09DrugPerc<strong>en</strong>tage forwhom the drugwas at homewh<strong>en</strong> child becameill withfeverNumber of childr<strong>en</strong>who tookthe specific antimalarialdrugSP/ Fansidar 3.9 41Amodiaquine 24.0 101ACT 13.7 101Any antimalarial drugs 17.9 302Note: Total includes 15 childr<strong>en</strong> giv<strong>en</strong> chloroquine, 16giv<strong>en</strong> quinine, and 34 giv<strong>en</strong> other antimalarials.Malaria | 171


HIV/AIDS-RELATED KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES,13AND BEHAVIOURRobert C. B. Buluma, Patrick Muriithi, and Joshua Gitonga13.1 INTRODUCTIONAcquired Immune Defici<strong>en</strong>cy Syndrome (AIDS) is caused by a human immunodefici<strong>en</strong>cyvirus (HIV) that weak<strong>en</strong>s the immune system, making the body susceptible to and unable to recoverfrom other opportunistic diseases that lead to death. The predominant mode of HIV transmission isthrough heterosexual contact, followed in magnitude by perinatal transmission, in which the motherpasses the virus to the child during pregnancy, d<strong>el</strong>ivery, or breastfeeding. Other modes oftransmission are through infected blood and unsafe injections.The future course of K<strong>en</strong>ya’s AIDS epidemic dep<strong>en</strong>ds on a number of variables includinglev<strong>el</strong>s of HIV/AIDS-r<strong>el</strong>ated knowledge among the g<strong>en</strong>eral population; social stigmatization; riskbehaviour modification; access to quality health care services for sexually transmitted infections(STI); provision and uptake of HIV couns<strong>el</strong>ling and testing; and access to care and antiretroviraltherapy (ART), including prev<strong>en</strong>tion and treatm<strong>en</strong>t of opportunistic infections. The principal objectiveof this chapter is to establish the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of r<strong>el</strong>evant knowledge, perceptions, and behaviours at th<strong>en</strong>ational lev<strong>el</strong> and also within geographic and socioeconomic subpopulations. In this way, prev<strong>en</strong>tionprogrammes can target those groups of individuals most in need of information and most at risk ofHIV infection.In collaboration with various stakeholders, the K<strong>en</strong>ya National AIDS Control Council(NACC) dev<strong>el</strong>oped the 2009/10 to 2012/13 K<strong>en</strong>ya National AIDS Strategic Plan III (KNASP III)which was launched in January 2010 (NACC, 2009). Although HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce seems to havestabilized, new HIV infections have be<strong>en</strong> estimated at 166,000 annually. This plan will thereforefocus att<strong>en</strong>tion on the prev<strong>en</strong>tion of new infections, reduction of HIV-r<strong>el</strong>ated illnesses and deaths, andmitigation of the effects of the epidemic on households and communities (NACC, 2009).In this chapter, indicators of HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitudes, and r<strong>el</strong>ated behaviours arepres<strong>en</strong>ted for the g<strong>en</strong>eral adult population age 15-49. The chapter th<strong>en</strong> focuses on HIV/AIDSknowledge and patterns of sexual activity among young people age 15-24, as young adults are themain target of many HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion efforts.13.2 HIV/AIDS KNOWLEDGE OF TRANSMISSION AND PREVENTION METHODS13.2.1 Awar<strong>en</strong>ess of HIV/AIDSRespond<strong>en</strong>ts interviewed in the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS)were asked whether they had heard of an illness called AIDS. Those who reported having heard ofAIDS were asked a number of questions about whether and how AIDS could be avoided. Table 13.1shows that awar<strong>en</strong>ess of HIV/AIDS is universal with 99 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 having heard of AIDS. The only groups for which the lev<strong>el</strong> of awar<strong>en</strong>ess of AIDS fallsb<strong>el</strong>ow 98 perc<strong>en</strong>t are wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with no education and wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintile.The preval<strong>en</strong>ce of knowledge was already high in 2003 (99 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> having heardof AIDS), so there has be<strong>en</strong> little change in the curr<strong>en</strong>t survey.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 173


Table 13.1 Knowledge of AIDSPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of AIDS, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicHas heardof AIDSWom<strong>en</strong>Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsHas heardof AIDSM<strong>en</strong>Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-24 98.8 3,475 99.6 1,40615-19 98.7 1,761 99.5 77620-24 98.9 1,715 99.7 63025-29 99.0 1,454 99.6 48330-39 99.6 2,086 100.0 80640-49 99.2 1,429 100.0 563Marital statusNever married 98.8 2,634 99.5 1,524Ever had sex 99.3 1,224 100.0 995Never had sex 98.4 1,410 98.6 529Married/living together 99.2 4,928 100.0 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 99.4 881 100.0 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 99.5 2,148 100.0 866Rural 99.0 6,296 99.7 2,392ProvinceNairobi 99.0 728 100.0 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 99.8 905 100.0 347Coast 99.6 674 100.0 252Eastern 99.7 1,376 100.0 530Nyanza 99.5 1,389 100.0 520Rift Valley 98.1 2,262 99.3 885Western 99.4 927 99.6 349North Eastern 98.1 184 99.3 62EducationNo education 93.8 752 95.5 112Primary incomplete 99.2 2,526 99.7 883Primary complete 99.8 2,272 100.0 804Secondary+ 99.9 2,894 100.0 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 96.5 1,393 98.6 457Second 99.5 1,483 100.0 577Middle 99.9 1,613 100.0 574Fourth 99.5 1,736 99.8 725Highest 99.6 2,220 100.0 926Total 15-49 99.1 8,444 99.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na 0 100.0 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na 0 99.8 3,465na = Not applicable13.2.2 Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tionAmong adults, HIV is mainly transmitted through heterosexual contact betwe<strong>en</strong> an infectedpartner and a non-infected partner. Consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion programmes focus their messagesand efforts on three important aspects of behaviour: using condoms, limiting the number of sexualpartners or staying faithful to one partner, and d<strong>el</strong>aying sexual debut for young persons (abstin<strong>en</strong>ce).Table 13.2 shows that knowledge of methods to avoid HIV transmission is g<strong>en</strong>erally widespread inK<strong>en</strong>ya. For example, 75 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 81 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> know that the chance of gettingHIV can be reduced by using condoms. Similarly, 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 93 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> knowthat limiting sex to one faithful partner reduces chances of getting HIV. Almost 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>and m<strong>en</strong> know that abstaining from sex reduces the chances of getting HIV.174 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.2 Knowledge of HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion methodsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who, in response to prompted questions, say that people can reduce the risk of getting the AIDS virus by usingcondoms every time they have sexual intercourse, by having one sex partner who is not infected and has no other partners, and by abstaining from sexualintercourse, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicUsingcondoms 1Limitingsexualintercourseto oneuninfectedpartner 2Wom<strong>en</strong>Usingcondomsand limitingsexualintercourseto oneuninfectedpartner 1,2Abstainingfrom sexualintercourseNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Usingcondoms 1Limitingsexualintercourseto oneuninfectedpartner 2M<strong>en</strong>Usingcondomsand limitingsexualintercourseto oneuninfectedpartner 1,2Abstainingfrom sexualintercourseNumber ofm<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 72.9 89.4 67.9 87.5 3,475 79.1 90.5 74.2 87.6 1,40615-19 67.0 87.9 61.4 87.4 1,761 75.7 89.2 70.6 87.8 77620-24 79.0 91.0 74.6 87.7 1,715 83.4 92.0 78.6 87.3 63025-29 78.5 92.2 75.7 86.6 1,454 76.5 92.1 73.8 91.1 48330-39 77.7 93.0 74.2 89.5 2,086 85.7 95.9 84.2 92.7 80640-49 70.9 93.3 68.3 90.0 1,429 83.3 95.4 80.6 90.3 563Marital statusNever married 73.7 89.9 69.1 88.2 2,634 79.6 90.7 75.1 87.6 1,524Ever had sex 84.0 93.1 80.2 88.5 1,224 84.2 90.9 79.2 87.9 995Never had sex 64.8 87.2 59.4 87.8 1,410 71.0 90.4 67.4 87.2 529Married/living together 74.7 92.1 71.4 87.6 4,928 82.4 95.1 80.0 92.2 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 77.7 92.7 73.4 92.4 881 81.8 91.4 79.7 87.3 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 81.4 95.2 79.4 90.0 2,148 86.1 93.7 82.1 92.5 866Rural 72.4 90.2 68.0 87.7 6,296 79.3 92.6 76.1 88.9 2,392ProvinceNairobi 85.9 94.5 83.4 87.5 728 94.6 94.6 90.5 95.9 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 82.8 95.2 81.0 93.3 905 87.2 98.4 86.2 91.6 347Coast 72.7 93.6 70.9 89.3 674 76.5 90.6 71.9 93.3 252Eastern 70.9 96.2 69.0 92.4 1,376 79.8 91.2 74.4 86.7 530Nyanza 81.3 94.4 78.3 91.9 1,389 89.4 96.0 86.1 96.6 520Rift Valley 71.5 86.8 65.6 82.4 2,262 80.5 95.2 78.8 90.5 885Western 74.7 86.3 66.7 88.4 927 67.5 81.6 62.0 75.7 349North Eastern 16.7 79.5 14.2 77.3 184 23.4 82.6 20.8 75.9 62EducationNo education 45.4 78.0 40.9 76.9 752 45.1 81.6 42.3 78.1 112Primary incomplete 70.9 89.2 66.2 87.7 2,526 75.7 89.3 71.2 87.6 883Primary complete 79.4 93.1 75.2 89.4 2,272 81.1 94.7 79.0 89.5 804Secondary+ 81.9 95.7 79.4 90.9 2,894 87.1 95.0 83.7 92.3 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 58.3 82.8 53.5 80.0 1,393 70.5 89.0 67.3 81.9 457Second 72.6 90.0 67.4 89.0 1,483 74.9 90.5 70.3 89.4 577Middle 75.9 93.0 71.2 91.4 1,613 81.4 92.9 78.4 88.7 574Fourth 77.5 93.1 74.1 89.3 1,736 82.7 94.1 79.6 91.5 725Highest 83.4 95.4 81.3 89.9 2,220 88.7 95.4 85.5 93.4 926Total 15-49 74.7 91.5 70.9 88.3 8,444 81.1 92.9 77.7 89.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na na na 0 67.4 97.2 66.1 89.7 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na na na na 0 80.3 93.2 77.0 89.8 3,465na = Not applicable1 Using condoms every time they have sexual intercourse2 Partner who has no other partnersResults show that knowledge of all the key HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion methods is lower among wom<strong>en</strong>and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 than among people age 20 years and older. Likewise, knowledge of how peoplecan reduce the risk of getting HIV is lower among those who have never had sex than among thosewho are married or living together with a partner, those who are divorced/separated/widowed, orthose who never married but have had sex.The survey further indicates that urban dw<strong>el</strong>lers are more knowledgeable about all methods ofreducing the risk of HIV infection than their rural counterparts. The lev<strong>el</strong> of awar<strong>en</strong>ess shows markeddiffer<strong>en</strong>ces across provinces. North Eastern province has the lowest lev<strong>el</strong>s of knowledge for allmethods of reducing the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS, whereas Nairobi and C<strong>en</strong>tral province t<strong>en</strong>d tohave the highest lev<strong>el</strong>s of knowledge.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 175


The lev<strong>el</strong> of education attained by wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 strongly r<strong>el</strong>ates to theirknowledge of ways to avoid contracting HIV/AIDS. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who have no education showmuch lower lev<strong>el</strong>s of knowledge of HIV/AIDS prev<strong>en</strong>tion methods than those with some education.The data further show that the poorest wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> are the most disadvantaged in terms ofknowledge of methods to reduce the risk of getting HIV/AIDS.Figures 13.1 and 13.2 show that there have be<strong>en</strong> marked improvem<strong>en</strong>ts since 2003 inknowledge of HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion methods among both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49. Particularly notable isthe increase in the proportion who know that using condoms can reduce the risk of HIV transmission.Figure 13.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tion Methods:Wom<strong>en</strong>10080Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> 15-4975819271798860615840200Using condomsLimiting sex to onefaithful partnerUsing condoms &limiting sex to onefaithful partnerAbstainingfrom sexMethod of Prev<strong>en</strong>tion2003 2008-09Figure 13.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Knowledge of HIV Prev<strong>en</strong>tion Methods:M<strong>en</strong>10080Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> 15-4972818993707889906040200Using condomsLimiting sex to onefaithful partnerUsing condoms &limiting sex to onefaithful partnerAbstainingfrom sexMethod of Prev<strong>en</strong>tion2003 2008-09176 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


13.2.3 Rejection of Misconceptions about HIV/AIDSIn addition to knowing about effective ways to avoid contracting HIV, it is also useful to beable to id<strong>en</strong>tify incorrect b<strong>el</strong>iefs about AIDS to <strong>el</strong>iminate misconceptions. Common misconceptionsabout AIDS include the idea that all HIV-infected people always appear ill and the b<strong>el</strong>ief that thevirus can be transmitted through mosquito or other insect bites, by sharing food with someone who isinfected, or by witchcraft or other supernatural means. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked about thesemisconceptions and the findings are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Tables 13.3.1 and 13.3.2 and Figure 13.3.Table 13.3.1 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who say that a healthy-looking person can have the AIDS virus and who, in response to prompted questions,correctly reject local misconceptions about AIDS transmission or prev<strong>en</strong>tion, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage with a compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDSby background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicA healthylookingpersoncan have theAIDS virusPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who say that:AIDS cannot betransmitted bymosquito bitesAIDS cannot betransmitted bysupernaturalmeansA personcannot becomeinfected bysharing foodwith a personwho has AIDSPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who saythat a healthy-lookingperson can have theAIDS virus and whoreject the two mostcommon localmisconceptions 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewith acompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledgeabout AIDS 2Numberof wom<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 87.4 75.4 90.5 87.1 64.7 47.5 3,47515-19 84.0 77.1 90.9 88.2 62.2 41.9 1,76120-24 90.9 73.7 90.2 85.9 67.3 53.3 1,71525-29 90.0 72.7 89.4 86.3 62.8 52.3 1,45430-39 92.3 71.5 91.0 87.6 64.5 53.2 2,08640-49 92.8 60.9 86.2 83.7 53.9 41.5 1,429Marital statusNever married 87.6 79.6 91.8 89.1 67.6 50.8 2,634Ever had sex 91.4 76.3 91.4 90.2 67.1 57.8 1,224Never had sex 84.3 82.5 92.1 88.2 68.0 44.7 1,410Married/living together 91.0 68.0 88.8 85.2 60.1 47.6 4,928Divorced/separated/widowed 91.5 67.4 89.0 85.6 60.9 48.7 881Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 94.7 79.5 92.1 90.9 72.4 62.0 2,148Rural 88.4 68.8 88.9 85.0 59.1 44.2 6,296ProvinceNairobi 93.7 82.8 92.6 91.6 75.1 66.7 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 97.6 71.5 93.4 89.4 67.6 57.8 905Coast 90.1 64.9 80.8 82.0 55.2 43.3 674Eastern 94.4 70.1 89.7 85.2 62.0 46.3 1,376Nyanza 94.3 73.3 88.5 86.5 66.3 54.8 1,389Rift Valley 83.3 70.1 89.6 85.7 58.5 43.5 2,262Western 89.7 74.1 93.8 91.3 64.6 45.8 927North Eastern 54.8 54.1 83.2 63.3 28.9 5.1 184EducationNo education 65.6 39.2 69.7 58.3 25.5 14.2 752Primary incomplete 86.7 63.6 87.3 83.9 51.6 37.5 2,526Primary complete 92.5 73.0 92.8 90.3 64.6 51.3 2,272Secondary+ 97.2 85.7 94.7 93.1 80.1 65.5 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 73.8 55.7 78.8 72.3 39.8 26.5 1,393Second 90.1 70.8 91.3 86.5 62.2 44.7 1,483Middle 91.7 72.6 91.6 87.7 63.2 48.3 1,613Fourth 94.0 70.6 91.6 89.2 64.4 50.3 1,736Highest 95.7 81.9 92.7 92.4 75.0 64.5 2,220Total 15-49 90.0 71.5 89.7 86.5 62.5 48.7 8,4441Two most common local misconceptions of source of disease: mosquito bites and sharing food with a person who has AIDS.2Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge means knowing that consist<strong>en</strong>t use of a condom during sexual intercourse and having just one uninfected faithfulpartner can reduce the chance of getting the AIDS virus, knowing that a healthy-looking person can have the AIDS virus, and rejecting the twomost common local misconceptions about AIDS transmission or prev<strong>en</strong>tion (mosquito bites and sharing food).HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 177


The data indicate that some misconceptions on how AIDS is transmitted still exist among theK<strong>en</strong>yan population age 15-49. It is <strong>en</strong>couraging that about 9 in 10 wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> know that ahealthy-looking person can have the AIDS virus and know that AIDS cannot be transmitted bysupernatural means or by sharing food with a person who has AIDS. However, misunderstandingsabout transmission through insects are more widespread; only about three-quarters of respond<strong>en</strong>tsknow that AIDS cannot be transmitted by mosquito bites.Table 13.3.2 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who say that a healthy-looking person can have the AIDS virus and who, in response to prompted questions,correctly reject local misconceptions about AIDS transmission or prev<strong>en</strong>tion, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage with a compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDSby background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicA healthylookingpersoncan have theAIDS virusPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who say that:AIDS cannot betransmitted bymosquito bitesAIDS cannot betransmitted bysupernaturalmeansA personcannot becomeinfected bysharing foodwith a personwho has AIDSPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who saythat a healthy-lookingperson can have theAIDS virus and whoreject the two mostcommon localmisconceptions 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewith acompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledgeabout AIDS 2Numberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 89.3 81.0 94.6 92.3 71.0 54.9 1,40615-19 85.4 82.1 94.5 90.8 69.6 51.7 77620-24 94.1 79.6 94.8 94.2 72.7 58.9 63025-29 94.4 75.4 93.2 89.4 68.2 53.6 48330-39 94.0 75.1 93.9 88.0 68.8 60.5 80640-49 94.5 68.1 92.7 86.2 63.3 53.5 563Marital statusNever married 90.3 80.5 94.3 91.9 71.5 56.0 1,524Ever had sex 93.5 80.4 94.5 93.4 72.9 59.6 995Never had sex 84.2 80.8 93.8 88.9 68.8 49.4 529Married/living together 94.6 72.6 93.5 88.3 66.2 55.7 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 83.4 76.5 94.1 84.6 66.3 54.9 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 97.7 85.8 96.5 93.3 81.5 69.5 866Rural 90.1 73.1 92.9 88.5 64.1 50.9 2,392ProvinceNairobi 98.7 86.7 96.3 92.9 83.2 76.6 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 95.6 75.8 94.0 93.4 71.2 63.9 347Coast 91.8 82.1 91.4 90.7 71.0 52.9 252Eastern 93.5 70.9 93.0 85.2 63.4 48.3 530Nyanza 95.3 79.3 93.3 92.4 72.1 62.9 520Rift Valley 88.2 75.7 95.0 88.5 66.7 53.7 885Western 90.2 72.6 94.2 90.0 64.4 45.3 349North Eastern 68.6 62.6 86.0 84.3 42.0 12.5 62EducationNo education 68.8 39.6 77.5 63.1 26.2 14.8 112Primary incomplete 84.1 63.8 92.3 84.5 51.8 37.8 883Primary complete 93.9 74.5 94.1 89.2 67.0 54.8 804Secondary+ 97.8 88.1 96.0 95.3 83.1 70.5 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 77.4 64.9 89.7 80.0 49.1 37.3 457Second 91.5 74.1 90.6 86.7 64.0 46.7 577Middle 94.4 77.6 95.2 90.2 71.6 56.9 574Fourth 93.1 74.4 93.7 92.1 67.2 54.5 725Highest 97.6 84.6 97.3 94.4 80.7 71.1 926Total 15-49 92.1 76.5 93.9 89.8 68.7 55.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 91.9 64.9 91.5 82.8 58.3 43.5 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 92.1 75.8 93.7 89.4 68.1 55.1 3,4651Two most common local misconceptions: mosquito bites and sharing food with a person who has AIDS.2Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge means knowing that consist<strong>en</strong>t use of condom during sexual intercourse and having just one uninfected faithfulpartner can reduce the chance of getting the AIDS virus, knowing that a healthy-looking person can have the AIDS virus, and rejecting the twomost common local misconceptions about AIDS transmission or prev<strong>en</strong>tion (mosquito bites and sharing food).178 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about HIV/AIDS is a useful composite measure and is defined asknowing that both consist<strong>en</strong>t use of condoms during sexual intercourse and also having just oneuninfected faithful partner can reduce the chance of getting the AIDS virus, knowing that a healthylookingperson can have the AIDS virus, and knowing that AIDS cannot be transmitted by mosquitobites or by sharing food with a person who has AIDS. Survey data show that about half of wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about HIV/AIDS, with slightly lower lev<strong>el</strong>s amongwom<strong>en</strong> than m<strong>en</strong> (49 perc<strong>en</strong>t for wom<strong>en</strong> and 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t for m<strong>en</strong>).The results show that compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about HIV/AIDS is lower among theyoungest and oldest age groups (i.e., 15-19 and 40-49). The data further indicate that knowledge islowest among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who have never had sex and highest among those who have nevermarried but who have had sexual intercourse.Figure 13.3 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive Knowledge about AIDS100Perc<strong>en</strong>t90929094879080727760404956200A healthy-lookingperson can havethe AIDS virusAIDS cannot betransmitted bymosquito bitesAIDS cannot betransmitted bysupernatural meansA person cannotbecome infectedby sharing foodwith a person wi whohas AIDSKnowledge about AIDSCompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledgeWom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge means knowing that consist<strong>en</strong>t use of condoms during sexual intercourse and having just oneuninfected faithful partner can reduce the chance of getting the AIDS virus, knowing that a healthy-looking person can have theAIDS virus, and knowing that a AIDS cannot be transmitted by mosquito bites or by sharing food with a person who has AIDS.K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Knowledge about AIDS transmission among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 residing in ruralareas is lower compared with knowledge among their urban counterparts. For example, the surveyshows that 62 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in urban areas have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about HIV/AIDScompared with 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t of their counterparts in rural areas. Similarly, 70 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in urbanareas have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about HIV/AIDS compared with 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in ruralareas. Among both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, the lev<strong>el</strong> of compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge is highest in Nairobi,C<strong>en</strong>tral, and Nyanza provinces and by far the lowest in North Eastern province. Only 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS.Among both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, the lev<strong>el</strong> of education is highly associated withknowledge about methods of transmission of the AIDS virus. Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge increaseswith rising lev<strong>el</strong> of education, from 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education to 66 perc<strong>en</strong>t of thosewith some secondary schooling. Similarly, 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> with no education have compreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledge about AIDS, compared with 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with at least some secondary school.The results further show that the poor are worse off in terms of knowledge of HIVtransmission than those who are wealthier. Among wom<strong>en</strong>, only 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in the lowestwealth quintile have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS compared with 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in thehighest quintile. Similarly, only 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the poorest m<strong>en</strong> have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge aboutAIDS compared with 71 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the richest m<strong>en</strong>.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 179


13.2.4 Knowledge of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIVIncreasing the lev<strong>el</strong> of g<strong>en</strong>eral knowledge of how HIV is transmitted from mother to child andreducing the risk of transmission using antiretroviral drugs is critical to reducing mother-to-childtransmission of HIV (MTCT). To assess MTCT knowledge, respond<strong>en</strong>ts in the 2008-09 KDHS wereasked if the virus that causes AIDS can be transmitted from a mother to a child through breastfeedingand whether a mother with HIV can reduce the risk of transmission to the baby by taking certaindrugs during pregnancy.Table 13.4 shows that 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> know that HIV can be transmitted bybreastfeeding. This knowledge has increased considerably since 2003 wh<strong>en</strong> only three-quarters ofwom<strong>en</strong> (72 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and two-thirds of m<strong>en</strong> (68 perc<strong>en</strong>t) knew that HIV can be transmitted bybreastfeeding. Awar<strong>en</strong>ess of treatm<strong>en</strong>t for maternal transmission has increased ev<strong>en</strong> moredramatically. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who know that the risk of mother-to-childtransmission can be reduced by the mother taking certain drugs during pregnancy has doubled fromthat of 2003, from 33 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in 2003 to 69 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 and from 38 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>in 2003 to 70 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Similarly, combined knowledge of both these indicators—i.e.,knowing that HIV can be transmitted by breastfeeding and that the risk of MTCT can be reduced bythe mother taking special drugs during pregnancy—also increased from 28 to 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 and from 30 to 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49.Knowledge of transmission through breastfeeding and of MTCT-reducing drugs is lower forthe youngest wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, as w<strong>el</strong>l as for those who have never had sex and for wom<strong>en</strong> who ar<strong>en</strong>ot pregnant. It is also lower for rural wom<strong>en</strong> and substantially lower among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> inNorth Eastern province than among those in other provinces. K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 withno education and those who have not completed primary education are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to know about thetransmission of HIV through breastfeeding than are those who have completed primary or somesecondary or higher education. The data also show that wealth is positiv<strong>el</strong>y associated withknowledge of HIV transmission.180 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.4 Knowledge of prev<strong>en</strong>tion of mother to child transmission of HIVPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who know that HIV can be transmitted from mother to child by breastfeeding and that the risk ofmother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV can be reduced by mother taking special drugs during pregnancy, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicHIV can betransmitted bybreastfeedingWom<strong>en</strong>Risk of MTCTcan bereduced bymother takingspecial drugsduringpregnancyHIV can betransmitted bybreastfeedingand risk ofMTCT can bereduced bymother takingspecial drugsduringpregnancyNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>HIV can betransmitted bybreastfeedingM<strong>en</strong>Risk of MTCTcan bereduced bymother takingspecial drugsduringpregnancyHIV can betransmitted bybreastfeedingand risk ofMTCT can bereduced bymother takingspecial drugsduringpregnancyNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 85.1 63.2 59.8 3,475 86.4 65.6 60.4 1,40615-19 81.4 53.2 50.5 1,761 86.3 62.7 57.9 77620-24 88.8 73.4 69.4 1,715 86.4 69.3 63.5 63025-29 89.0 75.0 71.0 1,454 86.9 69.7 67.1 48330-39 90.0 73.4 71.0 2,086 86.5 75.8 69.0 80640-49 87.2 68.4 65.4 1,429 86.2 70.1 65.6 563Marital statusNever married 85.0 61.8 58.7 2,634 85.3 65.0 60.0 1,524Ever had sex 88.1 70.4 66.1 1,224 86.8 68.1 63.3 995Never had sex 82.2 54.2 52.3 1,410 82.5 59.3 53.9 529Married/living together 88.4 71.9 68.6 4,928 87.8 73.5 68.8 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 88.2 71.0 68.1 881 83.5 73.0 62.8 142Curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnantPregnant 87.9 72.0 69.5 593 na na na 0Not pregnant or not sure 87.3 68.4 65.1 7,851 na na na 0Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 89.6 76.6 73.6 2,148 85.3 71.3 64.5 866Rural 86.6 65.9 62.7 6,296 86.9 68.9 64.4 2,392ProvinceNairobi 89.9 83.6 80.5 728 83.5 65.0 60.2 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 92.7 77.6 74.1 905 89.3 76.9 70.6 347Coast 88.2 61.1 59.4 674 91.3 58.1 53.7 252Eastern 88.6 63.6 61.5 1,376 87.2 69.1 62.7 530Nyanza 89.0 85.3 79.8 1,389 93.7 83.4 79.9 520Rift Valley 87.0 58.3 56.1 2,262 84.5 68.3 62.8 885Western 85.0 72.1 67.0 927 84.3 66.1 61.7 349North Eastern 40.5 13.9 13.4 184 38.5 20.2 18.5 62EducationNo education 64.4 33.9 32.1 752 62.5 37.4 34.4 112Primary incomplete 85.7 63.2 59.5 2,526 83.8 61.8 56.7 883Primary complete 90.2 72.1 69.3 2,272 88.4 69.3 65.6 804Secondary+ 92.5 79.6 76.3 2,894 88.9 76.8 70.8 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 76.1 48.0 45.3 1,393 81.7 54.6 51.6 457Second 88.0 68.0 64.2 1,483 85.2 68.4 63.0 577Middle 89.8 70.1 67.1 1,613 89.1 73.6 68.7 574Fourth 90.3 71.1 67.6 1,736 89.4 71.3 66.6 725Highest 89.8 79.0 76.1 2,220 85.6 73.7 67.2 926Total 15-49 87.3 68.6 65.4 8,444 86.5 69.5 64.4 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na na 0 81.2 58.7 53.5 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na na na 0 86.1 68.9 63.8 3,465na = Not applicable13.3 ATTITUDES TOWARDS PEOPLE LIVING WITH AIDSWidespread stigma and discrimination in a population can advers<strong>el</strong>y affect both people’swillingness to be tested and their adher<strong>en</strong>ce to antiretroviral therapy. Reduction of stigma anddiscrimination in a population is, thus, an important indicator of the success of programmes targetingHIV and AIDS prev<strong>en</strong>tion and control.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 181


To assess the lev<strong>el</strong> of stigma, survey respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had heard of AIDS were asked if theywould be willing to care for a family member sick with AIDS in their own households, if they wouldbe willing to buy fresh vegetables from a market v<strong>en</strong>dor who had the AIDS virus, if they thought afemale teacher who has the AIDS virus but is not sick should be allowed to continue teaching, and ifthey would want to keep a family member’s HIV status secret. Table 13.5.1 and Figure 13.4 showresults for wom<strong>en</strong>, while Table 13.5.2 and Figure 13.5 show results for m<strong>en</strong>.Table 13.5.1 Accepting attitudes toward those living with HIV/AIDS: Wom<strong>en</strong>Among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of AIDS, perc<strong>en</strong>tage expressing specific accepting attitudes toward people withAIDS, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicAre willing tocare for afamily memberwith the AIDSvirus in therespond<strong>en</strong>t’shomePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who:Say that afemale teacherWould buy with the AIDSfresh vegetables virus and is notfrom sick should beshopkeeper allowed towho has the continueAIDS virus teachingWould notwant to keepsecret that afamily membergot infectedwith theAIDS virusPerc<strong>en</strong>tageexpressingacceptingattitudes on allfour indicatorsNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho haveheard of AIDSAge15-24 89.8 66.9 75.2 49.3 28.8 3,43415-19 87.6 64.1 72.9 48.3 27.1 1,73820-24 92.2 69.7 77.5 50.3 30.5 1,69725-29 89.2 68.4 76.6 54.8 32.4 1,43930-39 90.6 71.6 78.5 58.6 38.5 2,07740-49 90.9 64.1 74.8 59.4 33.5 1,418Marital statusNever married 90.7 72.0 79.3 50.2 32.8 2,603Ever had sex 93.1 75.6 82.4 51.5 35.6 1,216Never had sex 88.6 68.9 76.5 49.1 30.5 1,387Married/living together 89.6 65.2 74.1 56.7 32.4 4,889Divorced/separated/widowed 91.3 70.0 78.4 52.6 32.9 876Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 91.8 78.9 87.9 51.6 38.3 2,137Rural 89.5 64.1 72.2 55.1 30.7 6,232ProvinceNairobi 94.5 81.0 92.7 50.9 41.0 720C<strong>en</strong>tral 92.0 73.5 86.4 59.5 42.5 903Coast 87.4 59.5 73.6 55.1 28.7 671Eastern 90.1 63.1 67.6 49.7 25.9 1,372Nyanza 95.3 77.9 83.4 47.2 32.6 1,382Rift Valley 88.2 61.0 70.2 59.0 30.2 2,219Western 89.2 75.0 79.9 58.2 39.3 921North Eastern 61.5 24.4 33.9 47.1 10.5 181EducationNo education 72.8 33.7 44.5 52.8 12.2 705Primary incomplete 87.4 58.4 65.7 51.0 23.7 2,506Primary complete 93.0 70.7 80.5 54.4 34.4 2,267Secondary+ 94.4 82.1 89.6 57.2 43.9 2,891Wealth quintileLowest 80.7 45.6 54.6 56.4 20.5 1,344Second 89.8 65.0 73.0 52.8 28.8 1,475Middle 92.9 65.9 74.1 55.6 33.7 1,611Fourth 91.1 72.3 80.2 54.6 34.5 1,728Highest 93.2 81.2 89.8 52.5 40.3 2,211Total 15-49 90.1 67.8 76.2 54.2 32.6 8,369182 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Figure 13.4 Accepting Attitudes towards Those with HIV: Wom<strong>en</strong>1008060Perc<strong>en</strong>t849060687657 5954402027330will to careAre willing tofor a r<strong>el</strong>ativecare for r<strong>el</strong>ativewith HIV at homewith HIV at homeWould buy freshWould buyvegetables from afresh vegetablesv<strong>en</strong>dor with AIDSfrom a v<strong>en</strong>dorwith AIDSB<strong>el</strong>ieve an HIV-positiv<strong>en</strong>ot want B<strong>el</strong>ieve an Would not wantfemale teacher should HIV-positive status ofHIV-positive female an HIV-positivebe afamily meteacher should be status of familyallowed to continue member toteaching remain secretPerc<strong>en</strong>tage expressingPerc<strong>en</strong>tageaccepting attitudes onexpressingall facceptingattitudes on allfour measuresRespond<strong>en</strong>ts2003 2008-09K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09The data show a g<strong>en</strong>erally upward tr<strong>en</strong>d since 2003 in accepting attitudes towards those withHIV. Over 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> express their willingness to care in their own households fora r<strong>el</strong>ative who is sick with AIDS, which repres<strong>en</strong>ts an increase of about 6 perc<strong>en</strong>tage points from th<strong>el</strong>ev<strong>el</strong>s reported in 2003. Similarly, 68 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> would be willing tobuy fresh vegetables from a v<strong>en</strong>dor who has the AIDS virus, also an increase since 2003. The largestincrease since 2003 is in the proportion of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who b<strong>el</strong>ieve that a female teacher who has theAIDS virus should be allowed to continue teaching. This proportion increased from 57 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> in 2003 to 76 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 and from 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in 2003 to 80 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. The only decline in accepting attitudes r<strong>el</strong>ates to disclosure of a family member’s positive status.In 2008-09, 54 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 69 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> say that if a member of their family gotinfected with the virus that causes AIDS, they would not want it to remain a secret, a decrease from59 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 72 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in 2003.The perc<strong>en</strong>tage expressing acceptance on all four measures is still low. Only one in threewom<strong>en</strong> (33 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and one in two m<strong>en</strong> (48 perc<strong>en</strong>t) show acceptance on all four measures. It isinteresting to note that wom<strong>en</strong> express less accepting attitudes towards people with HIV/AIDS thanm<strong>en</strong>.A slightly lower proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 express accepting attitudes towardspeople infected with HIV/AIDS on all four measures, compared with those age 20 years and above.Urban wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than rural wom<strong>en</strong> to have accepting attitudes on all four measurestowards people infected with HIV/AIDS; the differ<strong>en</strong>ce among m<strong>en</strong> is minimal. Accepting attitudestowards HIV-infected people are least common in North Eastern province, where only 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> and 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> express accepting attitudes on all four measures.Education and socioeconomic status are strongly r<strong>el</strong>ated to positive attitudes towards thosewho are HIV-positive. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who accept all four measures increasessteadily with education as w<strong>el</strong>l as with the wealth quintile. Only 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 18 perc<strong>en</strong>tof m<strong>en</strong> with no education express accepting attitudes on all four measures towards people infectedwith HIV/AIDS, compared with 44 and 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> respectiv<strong>el</strong>y with at least somesecondary schooling. Wom<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealth quintile are twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y to express acceptingattitudes on all four measures towards people infected with HIV/AIDS compared with wom<strong>en</strong> in thepoorest quintile (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 21 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Similarly, 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealthquintile express accepting attitudes on all four measures towards people infected with HIV/AIDScompared with 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in the lowest quintile.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 183


Table 13.5.2 Accepting attitudes toward those living with HIV/AIDS: M<strong>en</strong>Among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have heard of HIV/AIDS, perc<strong>en</strong>tage expressing specific accepting attitudes toward people with HIV/AIDS, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who:BackgroundcharacteristicAre willing to carefor a familymember with theAIDS virus in therespond<strong>en</strong>t’s homeWould buy freshvegetables fromshopkeeper whohas the AIDS virusSay that a femaleteacher with theAIDS virus and isnot sick should beallowed to continueteachingWould not want tokeep secret that afamily member gotinfected with theAIDS virusPerc<strong>en</strong>tageexpressingacceptingattitudes on allfour indicatorsNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho haveheard of AIDSAge15-24 93.3 77.1 76.9 62.8 40.9 1,40015-19 92.4 74.2 75.0 58.6 35.7 77220-24 94.3 80.7 79.3 67.9 47.3 62825-29 92.7 82.4 83.1 71.0 51.6 48130-39 96.1 82.2 82.1 73.1 53.8 80640-49 94.2 79.9 81.4 75.2 51.5 563Marital statusNever married 92.9 77.7 77.3 63.4 41.3 1,516Ever had sex 93.8 80.4 78.2 66.5 44.5 995Never had sex 91.0 72.7 75.5 57.5 35.3 521Married/living together 94.9 81.1 82.3 72.9 52.4 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 97.0 83.1 80.7 78.6 59.0 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 91.9 82.7 87.1 63.5 48.7 866Rural 94.8 78.5 77.3 70.6 47.1 2,384ProvinceNairobi 84.1 80.3 87.7 52.3 38.3 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 96.6 86.7 80.8 77.7 57.6 347Coast 94.7 80.6 84.0 70.0 49.2 252Eastern 95.7 66.2 73.1 68.7 36.6 530Nyanza 95.6 84.5 84.4 48.9 37.5 520Rift Valley 95.6 85.5 79.9 81.6 59.5 880Western 96.6 79.1 78.5 71.3 51.6 347North Eastern 64.1 27.0 46.7 63.7 13.8 61EducationNo education 81.7 51.1 39.4 75.9 18.4 107Primary incomplete 91.6 69.4 66.6 67.1 36.4 880Primary complete 94.5 80.6 79.2 71.3 48.0 804Secondary+ 96.2 87.4 91.2 67.7 56.1 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 89.8 71.3 65.2 70.8 38.5 450Second 95.1 76.6 75.7 69.7 45.8 577Middle 93.8 80.3 81.4 72.6 50.6 574Fourth 97.3 81.5 82.3 68.9 48.2 724Highest 93.1 83.8 86.9 64.5 50.5 926Total 15-49 94.1 79.6 79.9 68.7 47.5 3,250M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 90.3 69.3 70.7 72.3 37.3 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 93.8 79.0 79.3 68.9 46.9 3,457184 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Figure 13.5 Accepting Attitudes towards Those with HIV: M<strong>en</strong>100806040Perc<strong>en</strong>t88947480 806072694048200will to careAre willing tofor a r<strong>el</strong>ativecare for r<strong>el</strong>ativewith HIV at homewith HIV at homeWould buy freshWould buyvegetables from afresh vegetablesv<strong>en</strong>dor with AIDSfrom a v<strong>en</strong>dorwith AIDSB<strong>el</strong>ieve an HIV-positiv<strong>en</strong>ot want B<strong>el</strong>ieve an Would not wantfemale teacher should HIV-positive status ofHIV-positive female an HIV-positivebe afamily meteacher should be status of familyallowed to continue member toteaching remain secretPerc<strong>en</strong>tage expressingPerc<strong>en</strong>tageaccepting attitudes onexpressingall facceptingattitudes on allfour measuresRespond<strong>en</strong>ts2003 2008-09K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0913.4 ATTITUDES TOWARDS CONDOM EDUCATION FOR YOUTHCondom use is one of the main strategies for combating the spread of HIV. However,educating youth about condoms is sometimes controversial, with some saying it promotes early sexualexperim<strong>en</strong>tation. To gauge attitudes towards condom education, KDHS respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked ifthey thought that childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 should be taught about using condoms to avoid getting AIDS.The results are shown in Table 13.6. Because the table focuses on adult opinion, results are tabulatedfor respond<strong>en</strong>ts age 18-49.The table shows that 61 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 72 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 18-49 agree thatchildr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 should be taught about using condoms to avoid AIDS. Wom<strong>en</strong> age 18-19 are lesslik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> age 20 and above to agree that childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 should be taught about usingcondoms to avoid AIDS. On the other hand, m<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 are less lik<strong>el</strong>y than younger m<strong>en</strong> to agreethat childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 should be taught about using condoms to avoid AIDS. Urban resid<strong>en</strong>ts areslightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y than rural resid<strong>en</strong>ts to agree about condom education for youth. Resid<strong>en</strong>ts ofNorth Eastern province are by far the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to agree that childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 should be taughtabout using condoms to avoid AIDS; only 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> support this.Support for teaching childr<strong>en</strong> about using condoms to avoid AIDS is lowest among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>with no education and among those in the lowest wealth quintile.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 185


Table 13.6 Adult support of education about condom use to prev<strong>en</strong>t AIDSPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 18-49 who agree that childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 years should be taught about using a condom to avoid AIDS, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agree NumberM<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agree NumberAge18-24 63.5 2,389 73.6 97518-19 55.8 674 72.5 34520-24 66.6 1,715 74.1 63025-29 61.9 1,454 72.8 48330-39 59.1 2,086 74.2 80640-49 60.6 1,429 65.2 563Marital statusNever married 61.1 1,607 73.0 1,093Married or living together 60.3 4,872 71.6 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 67.8 878 68.1 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 64.7 1,972 73.0 810Rural 60.1 5,386 71.5 2,017ProvinceNairobi 66.7 681 74.6 303C<strong>en</strong>tral 65.6 809 68.3 312Coast 61.1 591 67.0 223Eastern 59.9 1,200 69.6 426Nyanza 70.2 1,181 69.5 422Rift Valley 56.1 1,953 80.1 801Western 63.0 782 72.2 289North Eastern 20.0 160 12.4 51EducationNo education 45.7 714 45.9 109Primary incomplete 64.0 1,979 70.0 620Primary complete 62.2 2,044 71.7 727Secondary+ 63.0 2,621 75.1 1,371Wealth quintileLowest 51.2 1,194 64.6 371Second 61.0 1,243 74.2 477Middle 65.0 1,365 70.5 477Fourth 61.6 1,502 75.4 616Highest 64.9 2,054 72.2 886Total 18-49 61.4 7,358 72.0 2,827M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na 53.5 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 18-54 na na 70.7 3,034na = Not applicable13.5 HIGHER RISK SEXInformation on sexual behaviour is important in designing and monitoring interv<strong>en</strong>tionprogrammes to control the spread of HIV. The 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya DHS included questions onrespond<strong>en</strong>ts’ sexual partners during their lifetimes and over the 12 months preceding the survey. Formale respond<strong>en</strong>ts, an additional question was asked about whether they paid for sex during the 12months preceding the interview. Information on the use of condoms at the last sexual <strong>en</strong>counter witheach type of partner was collected for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>. These questions are s<strong>en</strong>sitive, and it isrecognized that some respond<strong>en</strong>ts may have be<strong>en</strong> r<strong>el</strong>uctant to provide information on rec<strong>en</strong>t sexualbehaviour.13.5.1 Multiple Partners and Condom UseTables 13.7.1 and 13.7.2 show that m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 are nine times more lik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> tohave had two or more sexual partners in the 12 months before the survey (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t).There was a slight drop in multiple partnering, from 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> and 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in the186 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


2003 KDHS. The 2008-09 data further show that m<strong>en</strong> are twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y as wom<strong>en</strong> to have hadintercourse in the past 12 months with a person who was neither their spouse nor who lived with them(25 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among respond<strong>en</strong>ts who ever had sexual intercourse, the mean numberof lifetime sexual partners is considerably higher among m<strong>en</strong> (6.3) than among wom<strong>en</strong> (2.1).The 2008-09 KDHS also assessed condom use among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with multiple partnersor higher-risk sex in the 12 months preceding the survey. Although truly effective protection wouldrequire condom use at every sexual <strong>en</strong>counter, the sexual <strong>en</strong>counters covered here are thoseconsidered to pose the greatest risk of HIV transmission. Among respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had two or moresexual partners in the 12 months before the survey, 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>reported using a condom during last sexual intercourse (data for wom<strong>en</strong> not shown in table) 1 . Thesurvey further reveals that among respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had sexual intercourse in the 12 months before thesurvey with a person who was neither their husband/wife nor who lived with them, 35 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> and 62 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> reported using a condom at the last sexual intercourse with that person.The data show that place of resid<strong>en</strong>ce is r<strong>el</strong>ated to higher risk sexual behaviour. Wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong> in urban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than those in rural areas to have had sex in the previous 12 monthswith two or more sexual partners; to have had sex with a non-marital or non-co-habiting partner, andto have had more lifetime sexual partners.Wom<strong>en</strong> in Coast province and m<strong>en</strong> in Coast and Nyanza provinces are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to havehad sexual intercourse with at least two sexual partners in the 12 months before the survey thanwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> in other provinces. The lev<strong>el</strong> of education is corr<strong>el</strong>ated with use of condoms amongwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who had sexual intercourse in the last 12 months with a person who was neither theirhusband/wife nor who lived with them; use of condoms g<strong>en</strong>erally increases with the lev<strong>el</strong> ofeducation. M<strong>en</strong> with no education and those who are in the lowest wealth quintile are more lik<strong>el</strong>y thanother m<strong>en</strong> to report having multiple sexual partners in the 12 months before the survey and less lik<strong>el</strong>yto report using a condom with such partners. The greater proportion of m<strong>en</strong> in these groups who havemultiple partners may reflect their higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce of polygyny.1 The number of wom<strong>en</strong> reporting having two or more sexual partners in the 12 months before the survey is toosmall to show by background characteristics in the table.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 187


Table 13.7.1 Multiple sexual partners and higher-risk sexual intercourse in the past 12 months: Wom<strong>en</strong>Among all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse with more than one sexual partner and the, perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had intercourse in the past 12 months with a person who was neither their husband nor who livedwith them; among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse with more than one sexual partner and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had intercourse in the past 12 months with aperson who was neither their husband nor who lived with them; and among those having sexual intercourse in the past 12 months with a person who was neither their husband nor who lived with them, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage reporting that acondom was used at last intercourse with that person; and the mean number of sexual partners during her lifetime for wom<strong>en</strong> who ever had sexual intercourse, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Among respond<strong>en</strong>ts who everhad sexual intercourseAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts who hadintercourse in the past 12 months witha person who was neither theirhusband nor who lived with them:Among respond<strong>en</strong>ts who hadsexual intercourse in the past 12 months:All respond<strong>en</strong>tsMean number ofsexual partners inlifetime NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who reportedusing a condom at lastsexual intercourse with thatperson NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who hadintercourse in the past 12months with a person whowas neither their husbandnor who lived with them NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who had2+ partners in thepast 12 monthsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who hadintercourse in the past 12months with a person whowas neither their husbandnor who lived with them NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who had2+ partners in thepast 12 monthsBackgroundcharacteristic188 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and BehaviourAge15-24 1.6 16.7 3,475 3.1 33.0 1,765 39.5 582 1.8 2,10915-19 1.3 15.4 1,761 4.6 56.0 486 41.0 272 1.6 63920-24 1.9 18.1 1,715 2.5 24.2 1,279 38.2 310 1.9 1,47025-29 0.9 12.5 1,454 1.1 14.2 1,277 31.8 181 2.1 1,40030-39 1.4 9.2 2,086 1.5 10.4 1,848 31.2 192 2.3 2,03740-49 0.3 8.7 1,429 0.4 11.4 1,091 26.4 124 2.3 1,391Marital statusNever married 1.4 28.0 2,634 4.9 98.4 749 37.0 737 1.9 1,211Married or living together 0.9 0.8 4,928 0.9 0.8 4,778 15.8 41 2.0 4,872Divorced/separated/widowed 2.2 34.2 881 4.3 66.4 454 33.7 302 3.2 854Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.2 18.1 2,148 3.0 25.1 1,545 38.1 388 2.4 1,784Rural 0.8 11.0 6,296 1.2 15.6 4,436 33.7 691 2.0 5,153ProvinceNairobi 1.8 21.7 728 2.6 30.4 519 44.8 158 2.2 603C<strong>en</strong>tral 1.8 10.7 905 2.5 14.8 650 36.7 96 2.7 742Coast 2.5 13.1 674 3.4 17.6 501 21.1 88 1.8 560Eastern 0.5 8.8 1,376 0.7 12.5 975 27.5 121 2.3 1,088Nyanza 1.3 14.8 1,389 1.8 20.0 1,023 38.6 205 2.3 1,195Rift Valley 0.6 14.3 2,262 0.9 20.4 1,577 34.3 322 1.7 1,890Western 1.5 9.6 927 2.3 14.6 608 37.2 89 2.3 717North Eastern 0.0 0.0 184 0.0 0.0 128 * 0 1.1 141EducationNo education 0.9 6.0 752 1.1 7.7 582 4.1 45 1.7 693Primary incomplete 1.2 12.9 2,526 1.7 18.4 1,775 34.1 326 2.4 2,011Primary complete 1.2 11.2 2,272 1.7 15.0 1,695 30.7 255 2.1 1,949Secondary+ 1.2 15.7 2,894 1.8 23.5 1,930 41.7 454 2.0 2,284Wealth quintileLowest 0.6 9.6 1,393 0.8 13.6 988 16.2 134 1.9 1,169Second 1.0 11.1 1,483 1.4 15.8 1,037 36.4 164 2.0 1,200Middle 0.7 10.8 1,613 1.0 15.4 1,133 30.7 175 2.1 1,298Fourth 1.0 12.6 1,736 1.4 18.0 1,222 39.8 220 2.1 1,409Highest 2.2 17.4 2,220 3.0 24.2 1,601 40.9 387 2.3 1,860Total 15-49 1.2 12.8 8,444 1.7 18.0 5,981 35.3 1,079 2.1 6,937Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed. The number of wom<strong>en</strong> reporting two or more sexual partners in the 12months before the survey is too small to allow showing by background characteristics.188 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.7.2 Multiple sexual partners and higher-risk sexual intercourse in the past 12 months: M<strong>en</strong>Among all m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse with more than one sexual partner and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had intercourse in the past 12 months with a person who was neither their wife nor who lived withthem; among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse with more than one sexual partner and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had intercourse in the past 12 months with aperson who was neither their wife nor who lived with them; among those having more than one partner in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage reporting that a condom was used at last intercourse; and among those having sexualintercourse in the past 12 months with a person who was neither their wife nor who lived with them, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage reporting that a condom was used at last intercourse with that person; and the mean number of sexual partners duringher lifetime for m<strong>en</strong> who ever had sexual intercourse, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho had 2+partners in thepast 12 monthsAll respond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who hadintercourse in the past12 months with a personwho was neither their wif<strong>en</strong>or who lived with them NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho had 2+partners in thepast 12 monthsAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts who hadsexual intercourse in the past 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage who hadintercourse in the past12 months with a personwho was neither their wif<strong>en</strong>or who lived with them NumberAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts whohad 2+ partners in thepast 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreported using acondom duringlast sexualintercourse NumberAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts who hadintercourse in the past 12months with a person whowas neither their wife norwho lived with them:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreported using acondom at lastsexual intercoursewith that person NumberAmong respond<strong>en</strong>ts whoever had sexualintercourse:Meannumber ofsexualpartners inlifetime NumberAge15-24 7.7 35.5 1,406 17.9 83.0 601 67.3 108 64.3 498 3.9 85715-19 4.3 24.3 776 17.4 98.0 192 (69.1) 33 54.7 188 3.0 33320-24 11.8 49.3 630 18.2 75.9 409 66.5 74 70.1 310 4.5 52425-29 9.7 31.0 483 10.8 34.4 435 39.9 47 65.4 150 5.8 42830-39 12.3 16.7 806 13.2 17.8 755 16.5 99 54.8 134 7.2 72540-49 8.8 7.2 563 9.3 7.6 533 9.5 49 (47.4) 41 9.8 466Marital statusNever married 7.2 41.4 1,524 17.0 97.8 645 71.3 109 63.9 631 4.3 955Married or living together 11.0 7.7 1,592 11.2 7.8 1,574 13.9 176 61.4 123 7.3 1,394Divorced/separated/widowed 13.0 49.0 142 17.7 66.8 104 * 18 47.1 69 10.4 126Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 10.5 26.3 866 12.9 32.2 708 38.7 91 69.9 228 6.6 698Rural 8.9 24.9 2,392 13.1 36.8 1,615 36.3 212 59.1 595 6.2 1,778ProvinceNairobi 7.5 34.4 314 8.9 40.7 265 (59.1) 24 70.7 108 5.6 262C<strong>en</strong>tral 5.1 29.1 347 7.2 41.2 246 * 18 54.9 101 8.3 290Coast 12.6 25.0 252 15.8 31.5 200 34.1 32 68.3 63 7.8 194Eastern 4.9 19.7 530 8.3 33.6 310 (46.5) 26 41.7 104 4.9 348Nyanza 15.9 28.7 520 22.4 40.3 370 34.9 83 70.4 149 5.6 399Rift Valley 9.8 22.6 885 13.0 29.9 668 36.0 87 65.9 200 6.0 671Western 8.8 27.7 349 13.5 42.1 229 (35.5) 31 57.2 96 8.1 274North Eastern 7.2 2.8 62 12.2 4.7 36 * 4 * 2 1.8 38EducationNo education 16.2 16.7 112 20.5 21.1 88 (11.9) 18 * 19 6.0 89Primary incomplete 8.1 25.1 883 13.2 40.8 543 30.6 71 45.9 221 6.4 590Primary complete 9.9 24.6 804 12.9 32.0 618 34.6 80 63.0 198 6.9 622Secondary+ 9.2 26.4 1,459 12.5 35.9 1,074 45.3 134 72.2 385 6.0 1,175Wealth quintileLowest 12.7 21.4 457 18.4 31.0 315 21.1 58 50.1 98 6.2 318Second 6.9 19.9 577 10.7 30.9 371 (43.9) 40 63.7 115 6.1 414Middle 9.3 28.9 574 13.8 42.8 387 42.4 53 55.3 166 5.8 440Fourth 8.8 28.8 725 13.4 43.9 475 46.4 64 62.4 209 6.3 545Highest 9.6 25.5 926 11.5 30.5 775 34.4 89 70.8 236 6.8 759Total 15-49 9.3 25.3 3,258 13.1 35.4 2,323 37.0 304 62.1 823 6.3 2,476M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 10.0 5.9 207 12.1 7.2 171 (3.6) 21 * 12 12.9 158Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 9.4 24.1 3,465 13.0 33.5 2,494 34.9 324 61.5 835 6.7 2,633Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 189HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour| 189


13.5.2 Transactional SexTransactional sex involves exchange of sexfor money, favours, or gifts. Transactional sex isassociated with high risk of contracting HIV andother sexually transmitted infections due tocompromised power r<strong>el</strong>ations and the t<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy tohave multiple partnerships as a result. Male respond<strong>en</strong>tsin the 2008-09 KDHS who had had sex in theprevious 12 months were asked what their r<strong>el</strong>ationshipwas with their partners, with the option ofreporting a prostitute as a partner. In addition, theywere asked a direct question as to whether they hadpaid anyone in exchange for having sex in theprevious 12 months. M<strong>en</strong> who <strong>en</strong>gaged in transactionalsex were asked about condom use during th<strong>el</strong>ast paid sexual <strong>en</strong>counter.Table 13.8 shows that only 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 reported having paid for sexualintercourse, a slight decrease from the 3 perc<strong>en</strong>treported in the 2003 KDHS. Differ<strong>en</strong>ces in thereports of transactional sex by background characteristicsare minor, except that m<strong>en</strong> who aredivorced, separated, or widowed are more lik<strong>el</strong>y tohave paid for sex (8 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than m<strong>en</strong> who hav<strong>en</strong>ever be<strong>en</strong> married (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t) or those who aremarried or living together (1 perc<strong>en</strong>t). M<strong>en</strong> inWestern (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and C<strong>en</strong>tral (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t)provinces are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have <strong>en</strong>gaged in paidsexual intercourse in the previous 12 months thanm<strong>en</strong> in other provinces.More than two-thirds of m<strong>en</strong> who reportedhaving paid for sex in the 12 months before thesurvey said that they used a condom the last timethey paid for sex (not shown). The numbers are toosmall to show by background characteristics.Table 13.8 Paym<strong>en</strong>t for sexual intercourse: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 reporting paym<strong>en</strong>t forsexual intercourse in the past 12 months, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho paid forsexualintercoursein the past12 monthsNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 1.9 1,40615-19 1.5 77620-24 2.4 63025-29 2.9 48330-39 2.4 80640-49 1.4 563Marital statusNever married 2.6 1,524Married or living together 1.2 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 7.7 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.1 866Rural 2.1 2,392ProvinceNairobi 2.0 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.0 347Coast 0.8 252Eastern 1.1 530Nyanza 1.9 520Rift Valley 1.9 885Western 4.7 349North Eastern 1.3 62EducationNo education 0.9 112Primary incomplete 2.7 883Primary complete 1.9 804Secondary+ 2.0 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 1.2 457Second 1.8 577Middle 2.2 574Fourth 3.4 725Highest 1.7 926Total 15-49 2.1 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 0.3 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 2.0 3,46513.6 COVERAGE OF HIV COUNSELLING AND TESTING13.6.1 G<strong>en</strong>eral HIV TestingKnowledge of HIV status h<strong>el</strong>ps HIV-negative individuals make specific decisions to reducerisk and increase safer sex practices so they can remain disease-free. For those who have HIV,knowledge of their status allows them to take action to protect their sexual partners, to accesstreatm<strong>en</strong>t, and to plan for the future.To assess the awar<strong>en</strong>ess and coverage of HIV testing services, respond<strong>en</strong>ts in the 2008-09KDHS were asked whether they had ever be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV. If they said that they had, respond<strong>en</strong>tswere asked whether they had received the results of their last test and where they had be<strong>en</strong> tested. Ifthey had never be<strong>en</strong> tested, they were asked if they knew a place where they could go to be tested.Tables 13.9.1 and 13.9.2 pres<strong>en</strong>t the results regarding prior HIV testing for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.190 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.9.1 Coverage of prior HIV testing: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who know where to get an HIV test, perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by testing status andby whether they received the results of the last test, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> ever tested, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49who received their test results the last time they were tested for HIV in the past 12 months, according to background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho knowwhere to getan HIV testPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> by testing statusand by whether they received the results of th<strong>el</strong>ast testEver testedandreceivedresultsEver tested,did notreceiveresultsNevertested 1TotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tageever testedPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedresults fromlast HIV testtak<strong>en</strong> in thepast 12monthsNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 90.2 47.7 1.9 50.4 100.0 49.6 28.1 3,47515-19 85.2 27.8 1.4 70.8 100.0 29.2 17.8 1,76120-24 95.3 68.2 2.3 29.5 100.0 70.5 38.6 1,71525-29 94.2 73.2 2.1 24.8 100.0 75.2 40.2 1,45430-39 94.6 66.6 2.2 31.2 100.0 68.8 30.4 2,08640-49 92.8 46.4 1.5 52.1 100.0 47.9 19.4 1,429Marital statusNever married 89.1 35.8 1.5 62.7 100.0 37.3 21.9 2,634Ever had sex 95.6 55.6 1.6 42.8 100.0 57.2 33.2 1,224Never had sex 83.4 18.6 1.3 80.0 100.0 20.0 12.0 1,410Married/living together 93.7 66.9 2.2 30.8 100.0 69.2 33.0 4,928Divorced/separated/widowed 94.8 60.4 1.4 38.1 100.0 61.9 30.5 881Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 96.5 69.9 1.1 29.0 100.0 71.0 37.6 2,148Rural 91.0 52.0 2.2 45.8 100.0 54.2 26.4 6,296ProvinceNairobi 96.2 73.8 1.9 24.4 100.0 75.6 40.7 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 95.3 56.7 1.8 41.6 100.0 58.4 27.3 905Coast 93.9 65.5 1.6 33.0 100.0 67.0 37.3 674Eastern 91.9 51.2 1.8 47.0 100.0 53.0 21.6 1,376Nyanza 95.6 61.3 2.2 36.5 100.0 63.5 34.3 1,389Rift Valley 90.4 52.4 1.8 45.8 100.0 54.2 26.2 2,262Western 94.1 53.7 2.3 44.0 100.0 56.0 31.5 927North Eastern 53.1 23.5 2.4 74.1 100.0 25.9 10.9 184EducationNo education 68.1 38.3 2.4 59.4 100.0 40.6 19.5 752Primary incomplete 89.7 49.2 2.8 48.1 100.0 51.9 25.1 2,526Primary complete 96.2 61.5 1.6 36.9 100.0 63.1 29.9 2,272Secondary+ 98.1 63.8 1.3 34.9 100.0 65.1 35.1 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 79.0 44.5 2.7 52.7 100.0 47.3 23.5 1,393Second 92.4 51.1 2.4 46.6 100.0 53.4 27.3 1,483Middle 94.1 53.3 2.1 44.6 100.0 55.4 27.7 1,613Fourth 95.7 55.8 1.8 42.4 100.0 57.6 26.6 1,736Highest 97.0 70.6 1.0 28.3 100.0 71.7 37.5 2,220Total 15-49 92.4 56.5 1.9 41.6 100.0 58.4 29.3 8,4441Includes ‘don’t know/missing’HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 191


Table 13.9.2 Coverage of prior HIV testing: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who know where to get an HIV test, perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by testing status and bywhether they received the results of the last test, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> ever tested, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 whoreceived their test results the last time they were tested for HIV in the past 12 months, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho knowwhere to getan HIV testPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of m<strong>en</strong> by testing status andby whether they received the results of the lasttestEver testedandreceivedresultsEver testeddid notreceiveresultsNevertested 1TotalPerc<strong>en</strong>tageever testedPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedresults fromlast HIV testtak<strong>en</strong> in thepast 12monthsNumber ofm<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 88.5 31.2 2.4 66.4 100.0 33.6 18.6 1,40615-19 84.2 21.9 2.3 75.8 100.0 24.2 13.1 77620-24 93.8 42.7 2.5 54.8 100.0 45.2 25.4 63025-29 95.0 55.7 0.1 44.1 100.0 55.9 31.1 48330-39 95.1 48.0 1.5 50.5 100.0 49.5 26.3 80640-49 92.5 39.3 2.5 58.1 100.0 41.9 21.2 563Marital statusNever married 88.8 32.7 2.1 65.1 100.0 34.9 20.5 1,524Ever had sex 92.7 41.0 2.0 57.1 100.0 42.9 26.1 995Never had sex 81.5 17.3 2.5 80.2 100.0 19.8 9.8 529Married/living together 95.1 47.9 1.5 50.6 100.0 49.4 25.7 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 86.0 38.2 3.0 58.8 100.0 41.2 15.0 142Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 97.0 54.6 1.7 43.7 100.0 56.3 26.2 866Rural 89.9 35.3 1.9 62.8 100.0 37.2 21.5 2,392ProvinceNairobi 98.5 57.3 2.6 40.1 100.0 59.9 29.7 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 91.5 35.7 2.4 61.9 100.0 38.1 20.1 347Coast 98.2 43.6 3.1 53.2 100.0 46.8 20.8 252Eastern 89.4 29.4 1.8 68.9 100.0 31.1 10.8 530Nyanza 96.0 52.4 1.8 45.8 100.0 54.2 34.3 520Rift Valley 89.7 38.8 1.0 60.2 100.0 39.8 23.9 885Western 88.5 34.7 2.1 63.2 100.0 36.8 21.2 349North Eastern 66.9 17.1 2.1 80.8 100.0 19.2 9.0 62EducationNo education 56.4 19.3 2.5 78.2 100.0 21.8 13.1 112Primary incomplete 84.0 24.8 3.2 72.0 100.0 28.0 15.2 883Primary complete 94.8 38.6 1.7 59.7 100.0 40.3 22.9 804Secondary+ 97.6 52.4 1.1 46.5 100.0 53.5 28.1 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 81.0 22.0 1.0 76.9 100.0 23.1 12.2 457Second 90.4 34.1 2.7 63.2 100.0 36.8 20.3 577Middle 90.8 35.3 2.2 62.5 100.0 37.5 21.5 574Fourth 92.9 41.1 2.4 56.5 100.0 43.5 22.4 725Highest 97.7 56.0 1.2 42.8 100.0 57.2 30.7 926Total 15-49 91.8 40.4 1.9 57.7 100.0 42.3 22.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 89.6 31.2 2.8 66.0 100.0 34.0 15.1 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 91.7 39.9 1.9 58.2 100.0 41.8 22.3 3,4651Includes ‘don’t know/missing’Knowledge of a place to get tested for HIV is almost universal in K<strong>en</strong>ya; 92 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> know a place where people can go to get tested for HIV. Young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age15-19 are less lik<strong>el</strong>y than older respond<strong>en</strong>ts to know of a place to get an HIV test.. Knowledge ofwhere one can get an HIV test is higher among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> in urban areas than in rural areas.Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> from North Eastern province are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to know a place for HIV testing.Knowledge of a place to obtain an HIV test increases steadily with lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealthquintile.Despite the high lev<strong>el</strong> of knowledge of sources for HIV testing, only 58 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>and 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> have ever be<strong>en</strong> tested. Almost all of those who had be<strong>en</strong> tested said they hadreceived their results. Young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 and those age 40-49 are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to haveever be<strong>en</strong> tested than those age 20-39. Nairobi province has the highest proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> (76192 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


perc<strong>en</strong>t) and m<strong>en</strong> (60 perc<strong>en</strong>t) who have ever be<strong>en</strong> tested, while North Eastern province has th<strong>el</strong>owest lev<strong>el</strong>s for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>). Urbanrespond<strong>en</strong>ts are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than rural respond<strong>en</strong>ts to have ever be<strong>en</strong> tested. Coverage of HIV testingincreases with lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth quintile.Tables 13.9.1 and 13.9.2 show that 29 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49were tested for HIV and received their results in the 12 months before the survey. Rec<strong>en</strong>t testing ishigher among urban resid<strong>en</strong>ts, those living in Nairobi and Nyanza province, those with moreeducation, and those in the highest wealth quintile.13.6.2 HIV Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing during PregnancyTable 13.10 pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on HIV scre<strong>en</strong>ing of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who gavebirth in the two years prior to the survey. This process is a key tool in reducing mother-to-childtransmission (MTCT). Survey results show that 61 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who gave birth in the two yearsbefore the survey received HIV couns<strong>el</strong>ling during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care. Almost three in four (73 perc<strong>en</strong>t)wom<strong>en</strong> were offered an HIV test during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, accepted an offer to have the test, and receivedthe results of the test. Pulling all three <strong>el</strong>em<strong>en</strong>ts together, only 56 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> were couns<strong>el</strong>ledabout HIV during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, were offered and accepted an offer to have an HIV test, and receivedthe results.Table 13.10 Pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> couns<strong>el</strong>led and tested for HIVAmong all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who gave birth in the two years preceding the survey, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreceived HIV couns<strong>el</strong>ling during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for their most rec<strong>en</strong>t birth; the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who accepted anoffer of HIV testing by whether they received their test results; and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were couns<strong>el</strong>led, wereoffered and who accepted an HIV test, and who received results, according to background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho receivedHIV couns<strong>el</strong>lingduringant<strong>en</strong>atal care 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tage who were offeredand accepted an HIV test duringant<strong>en</strong>atal care and who:ReceivedresultsDid notreceive resultsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whowere couns<strong>el</strong>led,were offered andaccepted an HIVtest, and whoreceived results 2Number ofwom<strong>en</strong> whogave birth inthe last twoyears 3Age15-24 58.5 72.5 2.4 53.9 93215-19 48.4 65.4 4.5 43.7 21820-24 61.6 74.7 1.8 57.0 71525-29 65.9 73.8 1.1 59.1 58930-39 61.3 72.3 1.5 56.4 63840-49 58.9 71.4 1.8 55.8 105Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 77.6 87.1 1.1 72.9 457Rural 57.1 69.1 2.0 51.8 1,806ProvinceNairobi 88.9 90.2 1.6 85.8 136C<strong>en</strong>tral 66.9 86.1 0.7 65.2 168Coast 56.9 81.3 1.3 54.2 211Eastern 57.1 78.1 1.4 52.2 334Nyanza 65.0 73.1 1.7 57.9 452Rift Valley 57.7 66.1 2.7 53.3 647Western 65.6 68.8 1.5 55.3 254North Eastern 14.0 22.7 2.3 10.7 62EducationNo education 25.0 38.8 2.2 22.2 272Primary incomplete 57.0 68.6 2.6 50.3 739Primary complete 65.1 79.3 1.4 60.7 693Secondary+ 79.7 86.4 1.0 74.4 560Total 15-49 61.2 72.7 1.8 56.0 2,2641In this context, ‘couns<strong>el</strong>led’ means that someone talked with the respond<strong>en</strong>t about all three of the followingtopics: 1) babies getting the AIDS virus from their mother, 2) prev<strong>en</strong>ting the virus, and 3) getting tested for thevirus2Only wom<strong>en</strong> who were offered the test are included here; wom<strong>en</strong> who were either required or asked forthe test are excluded from the numerator of this measure3D<strong>en</strong>ominator for perc<strong>en</strong>tages includes wom<strong>en</strong> who did not receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for their last birth in thepast two yearsHIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 193


Young wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 and rural wom<strong>en</strong> are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be couns<strong>el</strong>led, tested, and toreceive their HIV results. Nairobi has by far the highest perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who were couns<strong>el</strong>ledabout HIV during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, offered a test, accepted it, and received the results (86 perc<strong>en</strong>t),while North Eastern province has the least (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The survey results show that HIV couns<strong>el</strong>lingand testing during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care increases with the lev<strong>el</strong> of education. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> whowere couns<strong>el</strong>led about HIV during ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, offered a test, accepted the test, and received resultsranges from 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education to 74 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with at least somesecondary school.13.7 MALE CIRCUMCISIONCircumcision is wid<strong>el</strong>y practiced in K<strong>en</strong>ya andoft<strong>en</strong> serves as a rite of passage to adulthood. Rec<strong>en</strong>tly,male circumcision has be<strong>en</strong> shown to be associated withlower transmission of sexually transmitted infections,including HIV (‘K<strong>en</strong>ya: male circumcision’, 2010; Bailey,et al, 2007). In order to investigate this r<strong>el</strong>ationship, m<strong>en</strong>interviewed in the 2008-09 KDHS were asked if they werecircumcised.Table 13.11 shows that 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 are circumcised, a moderate increase from th<strong>el</strong>ev<strong>el</strong> of 84 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003. Young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 are th<strong>el</strong>east lik<strong>el</strong>y to be circumcised (76 perc<strong>en</strong>t). M<strong>en</strong> in urbanareas (91 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have be<strong>en</strong> circumcisedthan their rural counterparts (84 perc<strong>en</strong>t). At least 90perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> are circumcised in all provinces exceptNyanza province, where less than half of the m<strong>en</strong> arecircumcised (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Of the various ethnic groups, Luom<strong>en</strong> are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be circumcised (22 perc<strong>en</strong>t), thoughthe lev<strong>el</strong> is slightly higher than in 2003 (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t).13.8 SELF-REPORTING OF SEXUALLY TRANSMITTEDINFECTIONSIn the 2008-09 KDHS, respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had everhad sex were asked if they had had a disease they hadgott<strong>en</strong> through sexual contact in the previous 12 months orif they had had either of two symptoms associated withsexually transmitted infections (STIs), that is a badsm<strong>el</strong>ling,abnormal discharge from the vagina or p<strong>en</strong>is or ag<strong>en</strong>ital sore or ulcer. Table 13.12 shows the s<strong>el</strong>f-reportedpreval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs and STI symptoms in the population forboth wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>.The data show that 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 2perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> reported having had an STI or havingexperi<strong>en</strong>ced STI symptoms during the 12 months precedingTable 13.11 Male circumcisionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who report havingbe<strong>en</strong> circumcised, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagecircumcisedNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Age15-24 81.7 1,40615-19 75.5 77620-24 89.4 63025-29 85.0 48330-39 89.2 80640-49 91.6 563Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 91.2 866Rural 83.8 2,392ProvinceNairobi 90.2 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 96.9 347Coast 96.6 252Eastern 96.2 530Nyanza 44.8 520Rift Valley 90.7 885Western 93.3 349North Eastern 98.5 62EthnicityEmbu 97.8 70Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 93.8 432Kamba 99.2 378Kikuyu 98.0 569Kisii 97.0 228Luhya 95.9 578Luo 21.5 425Masai (90.1) 39Meru 91.6 168Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 98.9 131Somali 99.2 69Taita/Taveta (100.0) 37Other 72.8 136EducationNo education 86.3 112Primary incomplete 79.4 883Primary complete 85.4 804Secondary+ 89.8 1,459Total 15-49 85.8 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 88.2 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 85.9 3,465Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49unweighted cases.the survey. The survey results indicate that 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> had a badsm<strong>el</strong>lingor abnormal g<strong>en</strong>ital discharge, while 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> reportedhaving had a g<strong>en</strong>ital sore or ulcer in the 12 months before the survey. Only 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 1perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> reported having an STI at the time of the survey.194 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.12 S<strong>el</strong>f-reported preval<strong>en</strong>ce of sexually-transmitted infections (STIs) and STIs symptomsAmong wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who ever had sexual intercourse, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage reporting having an STI and/or symptoms of an STI in thepast 12 months, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicSTIBadsm<strong>el</strong>ling/abnormalg<strong>en</strong>italdischargeWom<strong>en</strong>G<strong>en</strong>italsore/ulcerSTI/g<strong>en</strong>italdischarge/sore orulcerNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho ever hadsexualintercourseSTIBadsm<strong>el</strong>ling/abnormalg<strong>en</strong>italdischargeM<strong>en</strong>G<strong>en</strong>italsore/ulcerSTI/g<strong>en</strong>italdischarge/sore orulcerNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho ever hadsexualintercourseAge15-24 1.6 3.7 2.6 4.9 2,121 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.9 89315-19 1.0 3.2 2.4 3.8 646 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.2 34120-24 1.9 3.9 2.7 5.4 1,475 1.9 1.6 1.4 2.2 55225-29 2.3 4.3 2.7 5.5 1,416 1.5 1.9 1.5 2.3 47230-39 1.8 4.6 2.8 6.0 2,072 1.8 1.5 1.5 2.4 80340-49 1.9 3.3 2.1 4.2 1,425 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.8 562Marital statusNever married 1.0 1.6 1.1 2.2 1,224 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.6 995Married or livingtogether 1.8 4.2 2.5 5.3 4,928 1.5 1.7 1.7 2.3 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 3.4 6.1 4.9 8.8 881 1.4 1.3 1.4 2.8 142Male circumcisionCircumcised na na na na na 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.5 2,374Not circumcised na na na na na 4.0 4.5 4.7 6.1 354Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 1.9 3.1 1.7 4.3 1,810 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.4 773Rural 1.8 4.3 2.9 5.5 5,224 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.9 1,955ProvinceNairobi 1.5 1.6 1.5 3.8 612 0.4 1.0 1.4 1.8 296C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.9 3.1 1.9 3.9 750 1.1 1.1 0.9 1.4 294Coast 2.8 14.9 6.9 16.9 564 1.0 0.2 0.6 1.2 218Eastern 1.1 1.9 1.1 2.6 1,118 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.9 399Nyanza 3.2 4.8 3.6 7.3 1,222 4.0 4.3 4.4 5.8 440Rift Valley 1.2 2.4 1.3 2.7 1,906 0.8 0.7 0.6 1.1 757Western 2.7 4.8 4.3 5.9 720 1.9 2.0 1.2 2.2 286North Eastern 2.7 3.2 2.9 3.4 143 1.8 0.0 1.6 2.0 38EducationNo education 1.3 7.3 4.3 8.0 707 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.6 100Primary incomplete 2.8 5.8 4.0 7.5 2,039 2.4 2.3 2.5 3.5 659Primary complete 1.4 3.2 2.1 4.2 1,972 2.0 2.3 1.8 2.6 702Secondary+ 1.6 2.1 1.1 3.1 2,317 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.2 1,268Total 15-49 1.9 4.0 2.6 5.2 7,034 1.4 1.4 1.4 2.1 2,729M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 na na na na na 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.8 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na na na na na 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.0 2,936na = Not applicableThe s<strong>el</strong>f-reported preval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs and STI symptoms is higher among wom<strong>en</strong> than amongm<strong>en</strong>. The data show that wom<strong>en</strong> who are divorced, separated, or widowed have a higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce ofSTIs and STI symptoms than wom<strong>en</strong> who have never married or who are married or living together.The preval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs or STI symptoms is higher among uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> than among those whohave be<strong>en</strong> circumcised. A r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y high preval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs and STI symptoms is reported amongwom<strong>en</strong> in Coast province (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with wom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces. Among m<strong>en</strong>, thehighest preval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs and STI symptoms occurs in Nyanza province (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among wom<strong>en</strong>,the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of STIs and STI symptoms decreases as the lev<strong>el</strong> of education increases; however,among m<strong>en</strong>, the pattern is not clear.13.9 HIV/AIDS KNOWLEDGE AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR AMONG YOUTHThis section addresses HIV/AIDS-r<strong>el</strong>ated knowledge and sexual behaviour among youth age15-24. In addition to knowledge of HIV transmission, data are pres<strong>en</strong>ted on age at first sex, condomuse, age differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> sexual partners, sex r<strong>el</strong>ated to alcohol use and voluntary couns<strong>el</strong>ling andtesting for HIV.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 195


Younger people are oft<strong>en</strong> at a higher risk of contracting STIs, as they are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to beexperim<strong>en</strong>ting with sex before marriage. Therefore condom use among young adults plays animportant role in the prev<strong>en</strong>tion of transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, asw<strong>el</strong>l as unwanted pregnancies. Likewise, knowledge of where to get condoms is an importantprerequisite to their use.13.9.1 HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge among Young AdultsYoung respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked the same set of questions on b<strong>el</strong>iefs about HIV transmissionas older respond<strong>en</strong>ts. Information on the lev<strong>el</strong> of knowledge of major methods of avoiding HIV andrejection of major misconceptions is shown in Table 13.13 and Figure 13.6.Table 13.13 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS and of a source of condoms among youthPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of young wom<strong>en</strong> and young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 with compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS and perc<strong>en</strong>tagewith knowledge of a source of condoms, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage withcompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledge ofAIDS 1Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho know acondomsource 2Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage withcompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledge ofAIDS 1M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho know acondomsource 2Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 41.9 53.4 1,761 51.7 75.9 77615-17 38.8 46.2 1,086 44.5 68.7 43118-19 47.0 64.8 674 60.7 84.8 34520-24 53.3 76.9 1,715 58.9 94.3 63020-22 56.4 76.2 1,084 57.6 94.4 40423-24 48.0 78.0 631 61.2 94.2 225Marital statusNever married 50.0 59.9 2,185 55.3 83.2 1,293Ever had sex 58.2 74.4 831 58.6 92.2 780Never had sex 44.9 51.1 1,354 50.3 69.5 513Ever married 43.4 73.4 1,290 50.9 94.7 113Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 56.5 74.6 868 66.0 91.9 278Rural 44.5 61.7 2,607 52.2 82.2 1,128ProvinceNairobi 63.2 77.2 285 73.3 84.5 106C<strong>en</strong>tral 55.9 65.7 321 65.6 90.5 143Coast 38.8 62.9 290 55.2 94.2 84Eastern 46.3 57.3 519 42.4 70.1 268Nyanza 52.8 74.6 635 66.0 90.3 262Rift Valley 44.9 63.9 938 54.8 85.8 342Western 43.2 63.3 412 43.9 85.6 176North Eastern 6.0 17.9 75 13.3 64.9 25EducationNo education 10.1 27.0 195 (13.8) (54.1) 27Primary incomplete 33.6 54.6 1,151 38.3 75.9 489Primary complete 51.6 66.3 907 56.9 85.5 306Secondary+ 63.6 79.8 1,222 69.8 91.8 583Wealth quintileLowest 29.0 47.1 575 42.2 72.2 210Second 45.2 60.3 630 48.5 85.7 287Middle 46.7 65.6 683 53.4 81.9 284Fourth 48.6 69.6 723 58.7 85.3 347Highest 61.3 75.8 864 68.0 92.3 277Total 47.5 64.9 3,475 54.9 84.1 1,406Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.1Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge means knowing that consist<strong>en</strong>t use of condom during sexual intercourse and having justone uninfected faithful partner can reduce the chance of getting the AIDS virus, knowing that a healthy-looking personcan have the AIDS virus, and rejecting the two most common local misconceptions about AIDS transmission orprev<strong>en</strong>tion. The compon<strong>en</strong>ts of compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in Tables 13.2, 13.3.1, and 13.3.2.2For this table, the following responses are not considered sources for condoms: fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.196 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Figure 13.6 Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive Knowledge about AIDS andSource of Condoms among YouthCompreh<strong>en</strong>siveknowledgeof AIDS20032008-09Wom<strong>en</strong>3448M<strong>en</strong>Knows acondom source4755Wom<strong>en</strong>5365M<strong>en</strong>75840 20 40 60 80 100The data show that only about half of those age 15-24 in K<strong>en</strong>ya (48 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young wom<strong>en</strong>and 55 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young m<strong>en</strong>) have compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS. The data further showthat 65 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young wom<strong>en</strong> and 84 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young m<strong>en</strong> know a place where people can getcondoms.Compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS and knowledge of a source for condoms are bothconsiderably higher among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 20 to 24 than among those age 15 to 19. Bothindicators are also higher for young people who have never married but who have had sex than amongthose who have never married and have never had sex. Urban wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to havecompreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS and also to know a source of condoms than rural wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong>. Young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> from North Eastern province are least knowledgeable about AIDS andabout a source for condoms compared with those from other provinces. Knowledge of a source ofcondoms and compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS increases with increasing educational lev<strong>el</strong> andwealth quintile of both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>. For example, the proportion of young wom<strong>en</strong> withcompreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge about AIDS increases from 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with no education to 64perc<strong>en</strong>t of those who have att<strong>en</strong>ded secondary school.13.9.2 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Age at First SexBecause HIV transmission in K<strong>en</strong>ya occurs predominantly through heterosexual intercoursebetwe<strong>en</strong> an infected and a non-infected person, age at first intercourse marks the time at which mostindividuals first risk exposure to the virus. Table 13.14 and Figure 13.7 show the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of youngwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who had their sexual debut before age 15 or before age 18. The data showthat young m<strong>en</strong> (22 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y to <strong>en</strong>gage in sexual intercourse before age 15 thanyoung wom<strong>en</strong> (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t). By age 18, about half of wom<strong>en</strong> (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and slightly more than halfof m<strong>en</strong> (58 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have had sexual intercourse.Young m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong> in rural areas t<strong>en</strong>d to initiate sexual activity earlier than their urbancounterparts. Only 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban wom<strong>en</strong> had sex before age 18, compared with 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofrural wom<strong>en</strong>. Similarly, 51 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the young m<strong>en</strong> in urban areas had their first sexual intercoursebefore age 18 compared with 60 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in rural areas.Young wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and Coast province (53 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than those in other provinces to have initiated sexual intercourse before age 18. For young m<strong>en</strong>,Western province leads with 69 perc<strong>en</strong>t having had their sexual debut before age 18, followed byNyanza province in which 63 perc<strong>en</strong>t initiated sex before age 18.Perc<strong>en</strong>tHIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 197


Table 13.14 Age at first sexual intercourse among youthPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of young wom<strong>en</strong> and of young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who had sexual intercourse before age 15 and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of young wom<strong>en</strong>and of young m<strong>en</strong> age 18-24 who had sexual intercourse before age 18, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursebefore age 15Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts15-24Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursebefore age 18Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts18-24Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursebefore age 15Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts15-24M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursebefore age 18Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts18-24Age15-19 11.5 1,761 na na 22.3 776 na na15-17 12.9 1,086 na na 20.3 431 na na18-19 9.4 674 43.9 674 24.8 345 57.8 34520-24 10.4 1,715 47.8 1,715 22.0 630 58.2 63020-22 8.7 1,084 47.1 1,084 20.5 404 58.6 40423-24 13.3 631 49.0 631 24.6 225 57.5 225Marital statusNever married 7.6 2,185 25.7 1,158 22.5 1,293 56.7 863Ever married 16.7 1,290 66.4 1,231 18.7 113 68.2 112Knows condom source 1Yes 11.0 2,257 48.3 1,755 23.7 1,183 60.1 887No 11.0 1,218 42.2 634 14.0 223 37.6 88Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 8.5 868 39.1 692 15.4 278 51.1 222Rural 11.8 2,607 49.8 1,697 23.8 1,128 60.1 753ProvinceNairobi 3.0 285 27.0 239 17.3 106 60.8 95C<strong>en</strong>tral 4.2 321 32.6 225 15.1 143 50.1 108Coast 11.6 290 53.4 207 13.2 84 46.3 55Eastern 7.1 519 42.1 343 23.3 268 54.5 165Nyanza 18.3 635 63.6 427 27.2 262 63.3 164Rift Valley 13.7 938 47.9 630 22.5 342 58.9 257Western 8.7 412 48.4 267 27.3 176 69.2 116North Eastern 11.1 75 38.5 51 8.0 25 20.4 14EducationNo education 23.0 195 66.5 156 (12.1) 27 (39.6) 25Primary incomplete 17.2 1,151 68.5 604 24.7 489 65.1 226Primary complete 8.8 907 46.3 679 24.6 306 62.8 229Secondary+ 4.8 1,222 29.8 950 19.2 583 53.5 495Wealth quintileLowest 17.8 575 61.5 376 26.9 210 61.2 124Second 10.6 630 53.5 390 27.1 287 67.6 187Middle 10.5 683 47.5 435 23.0 284 60.9 188Fourth 10.5 723 43.9 489 20.9 347 56.6 238Highest 7.5 864 36.3 699 14.0 277 48.1 238Total 11.0 3,475 46.7 2,389 22.2 1,406 58.0 975Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.na = Not applicable1For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms: fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.Lev<strong>el</strong> of education is strongly r<strong>el</strong>ated to age at first sex, especially for wom<strong>en</strong>. Although 67perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 18 to 24 with no education had sex by age 18, the proportion declines to only30 perc<strong>en</strong>t among those with at least some secondary education. Similarly, early sexual debut seemsto be associated with poverty lev<strong>el</strong>s. Sixty-two perc<strong>en</strong>t of young wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintilehad their first sexual intercourse by age 18 compared with 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in the highest wealthquintile.198 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Figure 13.7 Age at First Sexual Intercourse among Youth70Perc<strong>en</strong>t605850474030201011220Sexual intercoursebefore age 15Age at First Sexual IntercourseSexual intercoursebefore age 18Wom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0913.9.3 Condom Use at First SexConsist<strong>en</strong>t condom use is advocated by HIV control programmes to reduce the risk of sexualtransmission of HIV among sexually active young adults. Young adults who use condoms at first sexare more lik<strong>el</strong>y to sustain condom use later in life. Condom use at first sex serves as an indicator ofreduced risk of exposure at the beginning of sexual activity. Table 13.15 pres<strong>en</strong>ts a cross-tabulation ofcondom use at first sex by s<strong>el</strong>ected socio-demographic characteristics of the youth and g<strong>en</strong>der.One in four young K<strong>en</strong>yans (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>) reported that theyused a condom the first time they had sex. A number of sociodemographic factors influ<strong>en</strong>ce condomuse at first sex among youth. As expected, condom use is higher among the never-married and thosewho know a source for condoms. Young urban wom<strong>en</strong> report higher use of condoms at first sex (33perc<strong>en</strong>t) compared with their rural counterparts (21 perc<strong>en</strong>t). This pattern is reversed for young m<strong>en</strong>with 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t of rural m<strong>en</strong> reporting condom use at their first sexual <strong>en</strong>counter, compared with 24perc<strong>en</strong>t of urban m<strong>en</strong>. Young wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi have the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of condom use at first sex (43perc<strong>en</strong>t), while those in North Eastern province reported the lowest use (2 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Provincialdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces in condom use at first sex among young m<strong>en</strong> are not so strong, with C<strong>en</strong>tral province havsthe highest lev<strong>el</strong> of use (36 perc<strong>en</strong>t).The survey shows that condom use at first sex increases with lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealthquintile for young wom<strong>en</strong>, but less so for young m<strong>en</strong>. For example, the proportion of young wom<strong>en</strong>who used a condom the first time they had sex ranges from 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with no education to 39perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with some secondary school. A similar but less steep increase occurs with wealthquintile. However, among young m<strong>en</strong>, although condom use increases with education lev<strong>el</strong>, thepattern by wealth quintile fluctuates.Comparison of the 2008-09 KDHS results with those of the 2003 KDHS shows that condomuse at first sexual intercourse among youth has doubled since 2003. The proportion using condoms atfirst sexual intercourse increased among young wom<strong>en</strong> from 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t in2008-09 and among young m<strong>en</strong> from 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. There areindications that programmes targeting wom<strong>en</strong> are yi<strong>el</strong>ding positive results.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 199


Table 13.15 Condom use at first sexual intercourse among youthAmong young wom<strong>en</strong> and young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who have ever had sexual intercourse,perc<strong>en</strong>tage who used a condom the first time they had sexual intercourse, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho used acondom atfirst sexualintercourseWom<strong>en</strong>Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho have everhad sexualintercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho used acondom atfirst sexualintercourseM<strong>en</strong>Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tswho have everhad sexualintercourseAge15-19 26.6 646 24.5 34115-17 27.9 294 18.9 13318-19 25.5 352 28.0 20720-24 23.1 1,475 26.5 55220-22 25.4 889 30.0 34023-24 19.5 586 20.9 212Marital statusNever married 34.6 831 26.6 780Ever married 17.4 1,290 19.7 113Knows condom source 1Yes 29.0 1,566 26.9 826No 10.4 555 10.9 67Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 32.8 557 23.8 189Rural 21.1 1,564 26.2 704ProvinceNairobi 42.9 182 21.8 88C<strong>en</strong>tral 27.5 170 36.2 91Coast 12.4 186 29.8 53Eastern 18.8 267 23.3 140Nyanza 26.8 473 22.1 184Rift Valley 24.4 586 28.5 218Western 19.5 222 22.3 114North Eastern 1.7 36 * 4EducationNo education 3.3 152 * 20Primary incomplete 17.9 676 18.7 269Primary complete 19.4 618 23.4 206Secondary+ 39.4 675 32.2 399Wealth quintileLowest 10.0 372 22.0 114Second 21.6 377 24.1 189Middle 23.7 388 29.3 188Fourth 25.6 427 26.6 209Highest 34.4 557 25.0 194Total 24.1 2,121 25.7 893Note: An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that hasbe<strong>en</strong> suppressed1For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms:fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home13.9.4 Abstin<strong>en</strong>ce and Premarital SexPremarital sex and the interval betwe<strong>en</strong> sexual initiation and marriage are among the factorsthat predispose people to HIV infection. Table 13.16 shows among never-married young adults, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage who have never had sex, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sex in the 12 months preceding thesurvey, and among those, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who used a condom at last sex.Tw<strong>en</strong>ty-four perc<strong>en</strong>t of never-married wom<strong>en</strong> and 38 perc<strong>en</strong>t of never-married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 years indicated that they had sex in the 12 months before the survey. Young wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanzaprovince and Nairobi are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to report sexual intercourse in the past 12 months than wom<strong>en</strong> inother provinces. Among never-married young m<strong>en</strong>, Nairobi has the highest rate of those reportingsexual intercourse in the 12 months preceding the survey. North Eastern province has the lowest200 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


perc<strong>en</strong>tage of never-married young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> reporting having sex in the past 12 months (0 and7 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).Young never-married m<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have used condoms at their most rec<strong>en</strong>t sexualintercourse (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than their female counterparts (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Young, never-married urbanresid<strong>en</strong>ts and those who know a source for condoms are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have used condoms at their lastsexual intercourse than were rural resid<strong>en</strong>ts and those who do not know a source for condoms. Amongnever-married young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, Nairobi has the highest proportion using condoms at last sex.Young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with at least some secondary education are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use condoms thanthose with less education.Comparison of the 2008-09 KDHS results with those from the 2003 KDHS shows a positivetr<strong>en</strong>d in condom use at last premarital sexual intercourse. The proportion of young wom<strong>en</strong> using acondom at last premarital sexual intercourse increased from 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09, while use among young m<strong>en</strong> increased from 48 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Table 13.16 Premarital sexual intercourse and condom use during premarital sexual intercourse among youthAmong never-married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who have never had sexual intercourse, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse in thepast 12 months, and, among those who had premarital sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who used a condom at the last sexualintercourse, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hav<strong>en</strong>ever hadsexualintercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursein the past12 monthsWom<strong>en</strong>Number ofnevermarriedrespond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho usedcondom atlast sexualintercourseNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hav<strong>en</strong>ever hadsexualintercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho hadsexualintercoursein the past12 monthsM<strong>en</strong>Number ofnevermarriedrespond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho usedcondom atlast sexualintercourseNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 72.6 17.2 1,535 41.8 264 56.4 24.4 773 54.9 18815-17 77.1 14.6 1,027 41.1 150 69.1 16.0 430 52.1 6918-19 63.5 22.4 507 42.8 114 40.4 34.9 342 56.5 12020-24 36.9 41.4 651 38.9 270 14.9 57.8 520 69.4 30120-22 40.8 39.6 479 33.9 190 17.8 53.1 365 65.6 19423-24 25.8 46.5 172 50.7 80 8.4 68.7 156 76.4 107Knows condom source 1Yes 52.8 32.5 1,310 47.0 425 33.2 43.1 1,076 66.0 464No 75.7 12.4 875 14.2 108 72.0 11.6 217 (23.5) 25Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 56.9 31.5 546 44.6 172 37.0 44.1 242 74.9 107Rural 63.7 22.1 1,639 38.3 362 40.3 36.4 1,052 60.8 383ProvinceNairobi 53.0 32.8 196 63.0 64 19.0 59.0 94 78.9 55C<strong>en</strong>tral 68.7 17.4 220 (32.2) 38 39.0 37.6 134 58.4 50Coast 71.3 20.5 146 31.1 30 41.9 44.2 74 77.7 33Eastern 70.5 19.1 358 (33.0) 68 50.5 24.0 254 (44.2) 61Nyanza 46.8 35.2 346 42.5 122 32.9 43.7 238 72.3 104Rift Valley 58.8 27.0 599 35.2 162 39.5 41.6 312 60.9 130Western 67.6 17.6 281 44.2 50 37.5 33.3 164 57.6 55North Eastern 100.0 0.0 39 * 0 88.3 6.6 24 * 2EducationNo education 78.6 13.5 55 * 7 34.5 * 22 * 12Primary incomplete 68.0 21.2 699 34.4 148 48.0 33.1 460 47.4 152Primary complete 58.8 25.9 492 29.3 127 37.7 40.9 268 67.8 109Secondary+ 58.2 26.7 940 50.1 251 33.9 39.6 544 75.5 215Wealth quintileLowest 67.6 22.2 300 16.2 67 50.2 35.3 191 54.7 68Second 62.8 23.6 403 42.1 95 38.2 31.8 258 69.2 82Middle 64.7 21.7 456 39.3 99 35.5 38.7 272 54.0 105Fourth 64.8 19.8 456 48.2 90 41.7 36.3 332 65.2 120Highest 54.1 32.1 569 44.9 183 34.9 47.5 240 73.0 114Total 62.0 24.4 2,185 40.3 534 39.7 37.8 1,293 63.8 489Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong>suppressed.1For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms: fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members and home.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 201


13.9.5 Higher-Risk Sex and Condom Use among Young AdultsThe 2008-09 KDHS investigated the ext<strong>en</strong>t of safe sex practices among young people.Information was sought from young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> aged 15 to 24 years, on whether they <strong>en</strong>gaged inhigher-risk sex in the 12 months preceding the survey and to what ext<strong>en</strong>t they used condoms inhigher-risk sexual <strong>en</strong>counters. In this context, higher-risk sex is defined as sex with a non-marital ornon-cohabiting partner. Tables 13.17.1 and 13.17.2 show for young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who had sexualintercourse in the 12 months before the survey, the proportion who <strong>en</strong>gaged in higher-risk sex in the12 months before the survey, and among those, the proportion who used a condom at last higher-risksex.Among those who <strong>en</strong>gaged in sexual intercourse in the 12 months before the survey, 33perc<strong>en</strong>t of young wom<strong>en</strong> and 83 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young m<strong>en</strong> <strong>en</strong>gaged in higher-risk sex in the past 12months. M<strong>en</strong> were more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use condoms in higher risk sex (64 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than wom<strong>en</strong> (40perc<strong>en</strong>t).Sexually active wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-17 are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to <strong>en</strong>gage in higher-risk sex (73perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 100 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>) than those agd 23-24 (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 64perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>). By definition, sexually active never-married youth are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to <strong>en</strong>gage inhigher-risk sex compared with those who have ever married. Never-married young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>are also more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use condoms during higher-risk sexual activity than ever-married youth.Nairobi province has the highest proportion of sexually active young wom<strong>en</strong> who <strong>en</strong>gage inhigher-risk sex (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while North Eastern province has the lowest perc<strong>en</strong>tage (0 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Among m<strong>en</strong>, geographic differ<strong>en</strong>ces are not pronounced. Among wom<strong>en</strong>, reported condom use at th<strong>el</strong>ast higher-risk sexual <strong>en</strong>counter is also highest in Nairobi (65 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and lowest in Coast province(25 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Among sexually active young wom<strong>en</strong>, the lev<strong>el</strong> of higher-risk sex increases dramatically witheducation, from 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t among young wom<strong>en</strong> with no education to 50 perc<strong>en</strong>t among youngwom<strong>en</strong> with some secondary or higher education. However, this association is not appar<strong>en</strong>t amongyoung m<strong>en</strong>. Condom use is highest among young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with secondary or highereducation.A comparison of results with those from the 2003 KDHS shows that there has be<strong>en</strong> littlechange in the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who <strong>en</strong>gage in higher-risk sex in the 12 monthsbefore the surveys. However, among those who <strong>en</strong>gaged in higher-risk sex, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who used acondom at the last higher-risk sex increased from 25 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 amongyoung wom<strong>en</strong> and from 47 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 64 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 among young m<strong>en</strong>.202 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Table 13.17.1 Higher-risk sexual intercourse among youth and condom use at lasthigher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months: Wom<strong>en</strong>Among young wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months,the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had higher-risk sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, andamong those having higher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tagereporting that a condom was used at last higher-risk intercourse, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicRespond<strong>en</strong>ts 15-24 whohad sexual intercourse inthe past 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad higher-riskintercoursein the past12 months 1Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsRespond<strong>en</strong>ts 15-24 whohad higher-risk intercoursein the past 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whoreported usinga condom atlast higher-riskintercourse 1Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 56.0 486 41.0 27215-17 72.5 209 41.0 15118-19 43.6 277 41.1 12120-24 24.2 1,279 38.2 31020-22 27.8 765 33.8 21223-24 19.0 514 47.8 97Marital statusNever married 99.3 534 40.6 530Ever married 4.2 1,231 28.8 52Knows condom source 2Yes 35.2 1,335 45.7 470No 26.1 430 13.7 112Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 38.6 485 44.0 187Rural 30.8 1,280 37.4 395ProvinceNairobi 44.6 151 64.8 67C<strong>en</strong>tral 31.0 137 (35.0) 42Coast 25.2 166 24.7 42Eastern 30.2 223 (33.4) 67Nyanza 35.8 394 40.0 141Rift Valley 35.1 483 34.9 169Western 29.4 178 44.3 52North Eastern 0.0 33 * 0EducationNo education 13.1 138 * 18Primary incomplete 27.9 580 35.6 162Primary complete 26.9 530 29.1 142Secondary+ 50.2 517 49.9 260Wealth quintileLowest 23.0 324 18.2 75Second 32.5 320 42.7 104Middle 33.7 306 37.8 103Fourth 31.6 345 41.7 109Highest 40.6 470 45.8 191Total 15-24 33.0 1,765 39.5 582Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asteriskd<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Sexual intercourse with a partner who neither was a spouse nor who lived with therespond<strong>en</strong>t2For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms:fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 203


Table 13.17.2 Higher-risk sexual intercourse among youth and condom use at lasthigher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months: M<strong>en</strong>Among young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, theperc<strong>en</strong>tage who had higher-risk sexual intercourse in the past 12 months, and amongthose having higher-risk intercourse in the past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage reportingthat a condom was used at last higher-risk intercourse, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicRespond<strong>en</strong>ts 15-24 whohad sexual intercourse inthe past 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad higher-riskintercoursein the past12 months 1Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsRespond<strong>en</strong>ts 15-24 whohad higher risk intercoursein the past 12 months:Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho reportedusing a condomat last higherriskintercourse 1Number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 98.0 192 54.7 18815-17 100.0 69 51.3 6918-19 96.9 123 56.7 11920-24 75.9 409 70.1 31020-22 85.3 232 65.1 19823-24 63.6 177 78.7 112Marital statusNever married 98.4 489 64.5 481Ever married 15.3 112 58.4 17Knows condom source 2Yes 83.1 570 66.4 473No (80.9) 31 (23.5) 25Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 76.8 141 74.9 109Rural 84.9 459 61.3 390ProvinceNairobi 83.8 68 77.3 57C<strong>en</strong>tral 86.8 60 59.1 52Coast 84.2 41 77.4 35Eastern 79.1 75 44.3 59Nyanza 87.8 128 71.1 113Rift Valley 77.9 160 63.6 124Western 86.4 66 56.8 57Northeastern * 3 * 2EducationNo education * 17 * 12Primary incomplete 85.3 181 48.1 155Primary complete 77.8 148 68.2 115Secondary+ 85.2 254 75.7 216Wealth quintileLowest 81.5 87 55.1 71Second 78.3 111 68.8 87Middle 89.4 117 54.2 105Fourth 88.9 136 66.2 121Highest 77.0 150 73.5 116Total 15-24 83.0 601 64.3 498Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asteriskd<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Sexual intercourse with a partner who neither was a spouse nor who lived with therespond<strong>en</strong>t2For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms:fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.Figure 13.8 shows information about young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>’s behaviour regardingabstin<strong>en</strong>ce, being faithful to one partner, and using condoms. It is obvious from the figure that bothwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 20-24 are far more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be sexually active than those age 15-19. The figurealso shows that wom<strong>en</strong> are far less lik<strong>el</strong>y than m<strong>en</strong> to report having had two or more partners in theprevious 12 months. Neverth<strong>el</strong>ess, m<strong>en</strong> age 20-24 are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> of the same age to bepracticing safe sex; they are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have had no partners in the previous year or to have hadonly one partner with whom they used condoms.204 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


Figure 13.8 Abstin<strong>en</strong>ce, Being Faithful and Condom Use (ABC)among Young Wom<strong>en</strong> and M<strong>en</strong>100% Perc<strong>en</strong>t Never had80%60%40%20%2+ partners &no condom2+ partner &used condom1 partner &no condom1 partner &used condom0 partnerslast yearsexualintercourse0%15-19 20-24 15-24 15-19 20-24 15-24Wom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-0913.9.6 Cross-g<strong>en</strong>erational Sexual PartnersTo examine age differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> sexual partners, wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 who had higher-risksex in the 12 months preceding the survey were asked the age of their partners. If they did not know apartner’s age, they were asked if the partner was older or younger than they were, and if older,whether the partner was 10 or more years older.As shown in Table 13.18, only 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 had higher-risk sexualintercourse with a man 10 or more years older than they were. Those aged 15-17, those living in ruralareas and those with incomplete primary education were slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y to report having higherrisksex with a man 10 or more years older than they were. A comparison of the results with thosefrom the 2003 KDHS shows that the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> having higher-risk sex with older m<strong>en</strong> hasnot changed.Table 13.18 Age-mixing in sexual r<strong>el</strong>ationships among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 who had higher-risk sexual intercoursein the last 12 months with a man who was 10 or more years older thanthems<strong>el</strong>ves, by age, resid<strong>en</strong>ce, and education, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age, resid<strong>en</strong>ce,educationPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong>who had higher-riskintercourse with a man10+ years older 1Number of wom<strong>en</strong>who had higher-riskintercourse in the last12 months 1Age15-17 4.6 15118-19 2.6 121Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.8 53Rural 3.9 219EducationNo education * 4Primary incomplete 4.6 121Primary complete 2.9 69Secondary+ 1.3 78Total 15-19 3.7 272Note: An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweightedcases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Sexual intercourse with a partner who neither was a spouse nor wholived with the respond<strong>en</strong>tHIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 205


13.9.7 Drunk<strong>en</strong>ness during Sex among Young AdultsEngaging in sex under the influ<strong>en</strong>ce of alcohol can impair judgm<strong>en</strong>t, compromise powerr<strong>el</strong>ations, and increase risky sexual behaviour. Respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had sex in the 12 months before thesurvey were asked for each partner if they or their partner drank alcohol the last time they had sexwith that partner, and whether they or their partner was drunk.As shown in Table 13.19, only 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> reported having sexualintercourse in the past 12 months wh<strong>en</strong> drunk. The perc<strong>en</strong>tage that had sexual intercourse wh<strong>en</strong> drunkor with a drunk<strong>en</strong> partner was higher for wom<strong>en</strong> than for m<strong>en</strong> (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).There is little variation in drunk<strong>en</strong>ness during sexual intercourse by background characteristics ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts, except that Coast province has the highest perc<strong>en</strong>tage of young wom<strong>en</strong> who had sexualintercourse wh<strong>en</strong> drunk or with a drunk<strong>en</strong> partner.Table 13.19 Drunk<strong>en</strong>ness during sexual intercourse among youthAmong all young wom<strong>en</strong> and young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months whilebeing drunk and perc<strong>en</strong>tage who had sexual intercourse in the past 12 months wh<strong>en</strong> drunk or with a partner who was drunk, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad sexualintercourse in thepast 12 monthswh<strong>en</strong> drunkWom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad sexualintercourse in thepast 12 monthswh<strong>en</strong> drunk orwith a partnerwho was drunkNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad sexualintercourse in thepast 12 monthswh<strong>en</strong> drunkM<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whohad sexualintercourse in thepast 12 monthswh<strong>en</strong> drunk orwith a partnerwho was drunkNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 0.4 2.1 1,761 0.0 0.0 77615-17 0.0 1.6 1,086 0.0 0.0 43118-19 1.0 2.9 674 0.0 0.0 34520-24 1.3 7.0 1,715 2.6 2.6 63020-22 1.2 5.9 1,084 1.8 1.8 40423-24 1.4 9.0 631 4.0 4.0 225Marital statusNever married 0.9 1.5 2,185 1.2 1.2 1,293Ever married 0.7 9.6 1,290 1.4 1.4 113Knows condom source 1Yes 1.2 5.3 2,257 1.4 1.4 1,183No 0.1 3.0 1,218 0.0 0.0 223Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 1.6 5.7 868 1.1 1.1 278Rural 0.5 4.1 2,607 1.2 1.2 1,128ProvinceNairobi 1.6 3.6 285 0.4 0.4 106C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.4 2.5 321 1.5 1.5 143Coast 1.0 8.3 290 0.8 0.8 84Eastern 0.2 2.8 519 0.1 0.1 268Nyanza 0.6 4.0 635 1.0 1.0 262Rift Valley 1.4 6.4 938 2.9 2.9 342Western 0.3 3.9 412 0.1 0.1 176North Eastern 0.0 0.0 75 0.0 0.0 25EducationNo education 0.0 6.3 195 (0.0) (0.0) 27Primary incomplete 0.5 4.5 1,151 1.2 1.2 489Primary complete 0.8 5.9 907 0.7 0.7 306Secondary+ 1.2 3.3 1,222 1.5 1.5 583Wealth quintileLowest 1.1 7.5 575 2.1 2.1 210Second 0.4 4.4 630 2.3 2.3 287Middle 0.3 2.3 683 0.0 0.0 284Fourth 0.3 5.4 723 0.9 0.9 347Highest 1.8 3.7 864 0.9 0.9 277Total 15-24 0.8 4.5 3,475 1.2 1.2 1,406Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.1For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms: fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.206 | HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour


13.9.8 Voluntary HIV Couns<strong>el</strong>ling and Testing among Young AdultsKnowledge of an individual’s own HIV status can motivate him or her to practice safer sexualbehaviour thereafter to avoid transmitting the virus to others. Table 13.20 shows the coverage of HIVcouns<strong>el</strong>ling and testing by background characteristics for youth aged 15-24 years. Young wom<strong>en</strong> age15-24 are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than young m<strong>en</strong> the same age to have be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV and received resultsin the 12 months preceding the survey and (41 and 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).The data show that urban young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIVand received results in the 12 months prior to the survey than their rural counterparts. Similarly,rec<strong>en</strong>t HIV testing among young people increases with increased lev<strong>el</strong> of education. For example,only 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education were tested and received results in the 12 months beforethe survey, compared with 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those with secondary and higher education.Table 13.20 Rec<strong>en</strong>t HIV tests among youthAmong young wom<strong>en</strong> and young m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who have had sexual intercourse inthe past 12 months, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who have had an HIV test in the past 12 monthsand received the results of the test, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho have be<strong>en</strong>tested for HIVand receivedresults in thepast 12 monthsNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsM<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tagewho have be<strong>en</strong>tested for HIVand receivedresults in thepast 12 monthsNumber ofrespond<strong>en</strong>tsAge15-19 35.3 486 23.1 19215-17 27.3 209 24.9 6918-19 41.4 277 22.0 12320-24 43.1 1,279 26.6 40920-22 45.0 765 22.8 23223-24 40.2 514 31.7 177Marital statusNever married 38.7 534 25.4 489Ever married 41.9 1,231 25.9 112Knows condom source 1Yes 45.3 1,335 25.9 570No 27.5 430 (17.8) 31Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 48.3 485 29.4 141Rural 38.1 1,280 24.3 459ProvinceNairobi 56.5 151 33.1 68C<strong>en</strong>tral 48.4 137 26.4 60Coast 46.4 166 20.9 41Eastern 36.0 223 12.0 75Nyanza 42.6 394 40.5 128Rift Valley 32.9 483 20.9 160Western 46.1 178 17.7 66North Eastern 14.3 33 * 3EducationNo education 21.6 138 * 17Primary incomplete 35.8 580 16.2 181Primary complete 40.0 530 29.5 148Secondary+ 52.9 517 31.6 254Wealth quintileLowest 31.6 324 19.1 87Second 39.7 320 25.9 111Middle 40.4 306 20.4 117Fourth 40.3 345 25.5 136Highest 49.1 470 32.9 150Total 15-24 40.9 1,765 25.5 601Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otesa figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1For this table, the following responses are not considered a source for condoms:fri<strong>en</strong>ds, family members, and home.HIV/AIDS-R<strong>el</strong>ated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour | 207


HIV PREVALENCE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS 14Abdulkadir A. Awes, Patrick Muriithi, Joshua Gitonga, James Muttunga, and Alloys OragoThis chapter pres<strong>en</strong>ts information on how widespread HIV testing is among the <strong>el</strong>igiblepopulation, the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV among those tested, and factors that contribute to HIV infection inthe population. The HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rates provide important information that <strong>en</strong>ables planning of anational response, evaluation of programme impact, and measurem<strong>en</strong>t of progress on the NationalHIV/AIDS Strategic Plan. The understanding of the distribution of HIV within the population and theanalysis of social, biological, and behavioural factors associated with HIV infection provide newinsights about the HIV epidemic in K<strong>en</strong>ya that may lead to more precis<strong>el</strong>y targeted messages andinterv<strong>en</strong>tions.Since an antibody test was dev<strong>el</strong>oped in 1984 to detect HIV, most countries have put in placesurveillance systems to monitor HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce lev<strong>el</strong>s and tr<strong>en</strong>ds based on data collected at ant<strong>en</strong>atalcare (ANC) clinics. The quality of these HIV surveillance systems has varied over the years (Garcia-Calleja et al., 2004), making it difficult to obtain consist<strong>en</strong>t and accurate estimates of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce.Although HIV surveillance systems were set up primarily to monitor tr<strong>en</strong>ds among population groups,the data collected by these systems have be<strong>en</strong> used to estimate the burd<strong>en</strong> of HIV in countries (Walkeret al., 2003). Improved estimates have rec<strong>en</strong>tly be<strong>en</strong> made possible through the use of nationalpopulation surveys to validate and calibrate these surveillance estimates.In Africa, several community HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce studies have shown that HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce in theg<strong>en</strong>eral adult population age 15-49 years old is similar to that of wom<strong>en</strong> att<strong>en</strong>ding ANC in the samecommunities (Garcia-Calleja et al., 2005). Some sci<strong>en</strong>tists have, however, highlighted the limitationsof using ANC s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance for deriving national estimates. First, the populations tested do notrepres<strong>en</strong>t the <strong>en</strong>tire population at risk (e.g., ANC data exclude m<strong>en</strong> and non-pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>).Second, pregnancy rates are affected by HIV infection, resulting in a bias in the population ofpregnant wom<strong>en</strong>. Third, pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> may not receive ANC, and rates of ANC att<strong>en</strong>dance maychange over time. Fourth, the sites s<strong>el</strong>ected for surveillance may not be repres<strong>en</strong>tative. They are oft<strong>en</strong>in conv<strong>en</strong>i<strong>en</strong>t urban or semi-urban locations, whereas in Africa the majority of the population is rural,and the misclassification of ANC cli<strong>en</strong>ts as rural or urban resid<strong>en</strong>ts is frequ<strong>en</strong>t (UNAIDS Refer<strong>en</strong>ceGroup, 2002; Fylkesnes et al., 1998; Zaba et al., 2005; and Glynn et al., 2001).Some of these limitations in deriving national HIV estimates from ANC surveillance data canbe overcome by adjusting for various factors (Gregson et al., 2002), but rec<strong>en</strong>t papers comparingANC surveillance results and population-based surveys have questioned the limitations ofextrapolating HIV national estimates from HIV s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance (Assefa et al., 2003; Fabiani etal., 2003; Neequaye et al., 1997; and Kwesigabo et al., 1996). National AIDS programmes have thusbe<strong>en</strong> under increased pressure by decision-makers to implem<strong>en</strong>t nationally repres<strong>en</strong>tative HIVsurveys as they are thought to provide better HIV estimates for the g<strong>en</strong>eral population.With the availability of more resources and new laboratory methods for HIV testing (usingdried blood spots or saliva), more than 30 countries have conducted national population-based HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce surveys. In some cases there have be<strong>en</strong> special surveys to estimate HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce,whereas in other cases HIV testing has be<strong>en</strong> added to DHS surveys. The results of these surveys allowa better understanding of HIV epidemiology by providing greater information on the behavioural riskfactors and the demographic and geographic patterns of HIV infection within a country. In this waythe surveys serve to calibrate ANC surveillance results (Boerma, 2003). They are, however, morecostly than s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance and are therefore impractical for tracking intermediate tr<strong>en</strong>ds as theyare conducted approximat<strong>el</strong>y every 5 years.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 209


In K<strong>en</strong>ya, as in most of sub-Saharan Africa, national HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce estimates have be<strong>en</strong>derived primarily from s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance in pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>. Since 2005, the national s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong>surveillance system has consisted of 46 sites in governm<strong>en</strong>t and mission health facilities s<strong>el</strong>ected torepres<strong>en</strong>t the differ<strong>en</strong>t groups, regions, and rural and urban populations in the country. In these sites,pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> att<strong>en</strong>ding ANC are used as a proxy for the g<strong>en</strong>eral population and their results areused to report on indicators for the national strategic plan as w<strong>el</strong>l as international indicators, such asthose dev<strong>el</strong>oped by the UN G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly Special Session (UNGASS).In K<strong>en</strong>ya, adjusted ANC s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance data indicated that the national HIV preval<strong>en</strong>cerate declined in adults age 15-49 years from 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t at the <strong>en</strong>d of the 1990s to 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003.Analysis and adjustm<strong>en</strong>t of the 2005 and 2006 s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance data produced estimated HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce rates of 5.9 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2005 and of 5.1 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2006 (NACC, unpublished data).Results from the 2003 KDHS showed that the s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> system had be<strong>en</strong> overestimating theHIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among adults, mainly because preval<strong>en</strong>ce among m<strong>en</strong> is substantially lower thanamong wom<strong>en</strong>. The 2003 KDHS estimated that 6.7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of adults age 15-49 were HIV-infected,with a higher proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> (8.7 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than m<strong>en</strong> (4.6 perc<strong>en</strong>t) infected. Regional variationsin HIV infection, high preval<strong>en</strong>ce among girls age 15-19 years (3.0 perc<strong>en</strong>t), low lev<strong>el</strong>s of voluntaryHIV testing, and discordance among cohabiting couples (7.5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) pose major chall<strong>en</strong>ges in thecontrol of HIV infection.The 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya AIDS Indicator Survey (KAIS) showed a reversal of the declining tr<strong>en</strong>d,with an estimated HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce of 7.4 perc<strong>en</strong>t among adults age 15-49 years. These results indicateproportionat<strong>el</strong>y more wom<strong>en</strong> (8.8 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than m<strong>en</strong> (5.5 perc<strong>en</strong>t) age 15-49 are infected. Anestimated 1.4 million adults age 15-64 are infected with HIV/AIDS, with about 1 million rural and400,000 urban resid<strong>en</strong>ts infected (NASCOP, 2009). Moreover, the 2007 KAIS results show that 35perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yans aged 15-64 years are infected with herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2). Among thosewith HSV-2, 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t are also HIV-positive, while among those who do not have HSV-2, HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce is only 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t.14.1 COVERAGE OF HIV TESTINGTable 14.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts response rates for HIV testing and gives the reasons people were nottested by g<strong>en</strong>der, urban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce, and province (region). Overall, HIV tests were conducted for83 perc<strong>en</strong>t of <strong>el</strong>igible respond<strong>en</strong>ts, including 86 perc<strong>en</strong>t of the 4,418 <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> and 79 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofthe 3,910 <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong>. Rural resid<strong>en</strong>ts (85 perc<strong>en</strong>t) were more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tested than their urbancounterparts (78 perc<strong>en</strong>t). People who were not tested f<strong>el</strong>l into the following four categories:• Those who refused testing (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t overall)• Those who were interviewed but who were not home for testing either wh<strong>en</strong> the healthworker first arrived or wh<strong>en</strong> later callbacks were made (less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t)• Those who were not at home either for the interview or for the testing (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t)• Those who were missing test results for some other reason, such as (1) respond<strong>en</strong>tsincapable of giving cons<strong>en</strong>t for testing, (2) mismatches betwe<strong>en</strong> the questionnaire and theblood sample, or (3) those for whom there were technical problems in taking blood (2perc<strong>en</strong>t)Refusal is the most important reason for non-response to HIV testing among both wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong>. Among m<strong>en</strong>, abs<strong>en</strong>ce accounts for a sizeable amount of non-response to HIV testing, but amongwom<strong>en</strong> it is less important. In urban areas, refusal rates are higher (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than in rural areas (10perc<strong>en</strong>t).210 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


This table also shows that, contrary to instructions giv<strong>en</strong> to fi<strong>el</strong>d staff, a very small number ofrespond<strong>en</strong>ts were tested for HIV ev<strong>en</strong> though they were never interviewed (less than one-half of oneperc<strong>en</strong>t). This result could also be due to loss of a few questionnaires. There are strong differ<strong>en</strong>ces inHIV testing rates by province. Among both sexes, Coast province had the highest rate of testing (89perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by Nyanza and Western provinces (86 perc<strong>en</strong>t each). North Eastern province (71perc<strong>en</strong>t) and C<strong>en</strong>tral province (77 perc<strong>en</strong>t) had the lowest coverage rates for HIV testing. In everyprovince, wom<strong>en</strong> were more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tested than m<strong>en</strong> (Figure 14.1). North Eastern Province hadthe highest rate of refusal among wom<strong>en</strong> (16 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and C<strong>en</strong>tral had the highest rate among m<strong>en</strong> (21perc<strong>en</strong>t).Figure 14.1 Coverage of HIV Testing by G<strong>en</strong>der10080Perc<strong>en</strong>t83 8379719187887891868981 81 8373686040200Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern Nyanza Rift Valley Western NorthEasternProvinceWom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 211


Table 14.1 Coverage of HIV testing by resid<strong>en</strong>ce and regionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 <strong>el</strong>igible for HIV testing by testing status, according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce andregion (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicDBS tested 1InterviewedRefused toprovide bloodNot interviewedInterviewedTesting statusAbs<strong>en</strong>t at the time ofblood collection Other/missing 2Not interviewedInterviewedNot interviewedInterviewedNot interviewedTotal NumberWOMENResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 81.3 0.1 10.2 2.1 0.3 2.5 3.2 0.4 100.0 1,345Rural 88.4 0.1 7.3 1.4 0.2 1.3 0.7 0.6 100.0 3,073ProvinceNairobi 82.7 0.2 8.8 2.1 0.6 3.9 1.2 0.4 100.0 486C<strong>en</strong>tral 82.5 0.0 11.0 2.8 0.4 2.0 0.0 1.3 100.0 538Coast 91.0 0.2 5.0 1.6 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.4 100.0 557Eastern 88.0 0.2 7.6 2.0 0.0 1.6 0.5 0.2 100.0 608Nyanza 90.7 0.0 5.7 0.9 0.1 2.1 0.0 0.4 100.0 680Rift Valley 86.2 0.0 8.2 1.6 0.3 1.3 2.2 0.1 100.0 679Western 88.7 0.2 7.7 1.3 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.5 100.0 548NorthEastern 73.0 0.0 15.2 0.6 0.0 1.2 8.7 1.2 100.0 322Total 86.3 0.1 8.2 1.6 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 100.0 4,418MENResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 74.3 0.2 7.8 6.3 0.3 6.8 3.0 1.3 100.0 1,269Rural 81.5 0.1 7.8 3.2 0.2 5.3 0.7 1.2 100.0 2,641ProvinceNairobi 79.2 0.2 7.8 4.6 0.0 6.1 1.7 0.4 100.0 477C<strong>en</strong>tral 70.5 0.4 12.0 8.6 0.0 5.8 0.9 1.7 100.0 465Coast 86.9 0.4 4.6 2.5 0.0 2.9 1.5 1.2 100.0 482Eastern 77.8 0.2 8.3 5.2 0.2 6.6 0.8 1.0 100.0 519Nyanza 81.4 0.0 6.6 2.1 1.0 7.8 0.3 0.8 100.0 606Rift Valley 80.6 0.0 8.0 3.8 0.2 5.6 1.5 0.3 100.0 602Western 82.6 0.0 7.2 4.4 0.0 4.0 0.4 1.4 100.0 500NorthEastern 67.6 0.0 8.9 1.9 0.0 8.5 8.1 5.0 100.0 259Total 79.2 0.2 7.8 4.2 0.2 5.8 1.5 1.2 100.0 3,910TOTALResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 77.9 0.2 9.0 4.1 0.3 4.6 3.1 0.8 100.0 2,614Rural 85.2 0.1 7.5 2.2 0.2 3.2 0.7 0.9 100.0 5,714ProvinceNairobi 81.0 0.2 8.3 3.3 0.3 5.0 1.5 0.4 100.0 963C<strong>en</strong>tral 77.0 0.2 11.5 5.5 0.2 3.8 0.4 1.5 100.0 1,003Coast 89.1 0.3 4.8 2.0 0.0 1.4 1.5 0.8 100.0 1,039Eastern 83.3 0.2 7.9 3.5 0.1 3.9 0.6 0.5 100.0 1,127Nyanza 86.3 0.0 6.1 1.5 0.5 4.7 0.2 0.6 100.0 1,286Rift Valley 83.5 0.0 8.1 2.7 0.2 3.4 1.9 0.2 100.0 1,281Western 85.8 0.1 7.4 2.8 0.1 2.5 0.4 1.0 100.0 1,048NorthEastern 70.6 0.0 12.4 1.2 0.0 4.5 8.4 2.9 100.0 581Total 82.9 0.1 8.0 2.8 0.2 3.6 1.4 0.9 100.0 8,3281Includes all dried blood spot (DBS) samples tested at the lab and for which there is a result (i.e., positive, negative, orindeterminate. (Indeterminate means that the sample w<strong>en</strong>t through the <strong>en</strong>tire algorithm, but the final result was inconclusive.)2Includes: (1) other results of blood collection (e.g., technical problem in the fi<strong>el</strong>d), (2) lost specim<strong>en</strong>s, (3) noncorresponding barcodes, and (4) other lab results such as blood not tested for technical reason, not <strong>en</strong>ough blood to complete the algorithm, etc.Table 14.2 shows coverage rates for HIV testing by age group and socioeconomic status andthe reasons for non-response. The coverage rate for testing among wom<strong>en</strong> is consist<strong>en</strong>t across all agegroups (range 84 perc<strong>en</strong>t to 89 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among wom<strong>en</strong>, the highest refusal rates were among thoseage 15-19 and age 25-29, and the lowest rate was among those age 20-24. Among m<strong>en</strong>, the highestrates of testing were among those age 15-19 (84 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and 40-44 (83 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and the lowest rateswere among those age 25-29 and age 35-39 (76 perc<strong>en</strong>t).212 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with no education were far less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tested than those with someeducation. Among the latter group, coverage rates did not vary substantially by the lev<strong>el</strong> of educationattained. Those in the highest quintile of the wealth index were the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to be tested.Table 14.2 Coverage of HIV testing by s<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 <strong>el</strong>igible for HIV testing by testing status, according to s<strong>el</strong>ected backgroundcharacteristics (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicDBS tested 1InterviewedRefused toprovide bloodNotinterviewedInterviewedTesting statusAbs<strong>en</strong>t at the time ofblood collection Other/missing 2NotinterviewedInterviewedNotinterviewedInterviewedNotinterviewedTotal NumberWOMENAge15-19 84.4 0.0 9.7 1.9 0.1 2.0 1.4 0.5 100.0 94620-24 88.7 0.1 6.0 2.0 0.2 0.9 2.0 0.1 100.0 91425-29 85.6 0.1 9.8 1.2 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.8 100.0 73530-34 86.0 0.2 8.3 1.5 0.0 1.8 1.7 0.5 100.0 60035-39 86.9 0.0 8.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.7 0.4 100.0 47440-44 85.3 0.3 6.6 1.8 0.5 3.4 0.8 1.3 100.0 38145-49 87.0 0.0 8.2 1.1 0.3 1.9 1.4 0.3 100.0 368EducationNo education 81.7 0.0 12.0 1.1 0.0 1.6 2.7 0.9 100.0 635Primary incomplete 87.2 0.1 8.5 1.5 0.2 1.1 0.8 0.7 100.0 1,298Primary complete 88.0 0.2 6.5 1.6 0.1 1.6 1.8 0.2 100.0 998Secondary+ 86.4 0.1 7.5 2.0 0.4 2.2 1.2 0.3 100.0 1,484Wealth quintileLowest 87.3 0.1 8.6 1.0 0.1 1.2 1.0 0.6 100.0 892Second 89.1 0.0 7.5 0.7 0.0 1.6 0.6 0.6 100.0 695Middle 86.5 0.0 7.7 1.6 0.1 1.5 1.6 0.8 100.0 728Fourth 87.9 0.1 6.8 2.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 0.5 100.0 851Highest 82.7 0.2 9.5 2.2 0.3 2.6 2.2 0.3 100.0 1,252Total 86.3 0.1 8.2 1.6 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.5 100.0 4,418MENAge15-19 83.5 0.4 5.1 3.2 0.2 4.0 1.7 1.9 100.0 84320-24 78.8 0.0 8.7 3.2 0.1 6.2 2.2 0.7 100.0 69025-29 76.1 0.0 8.3 4.6 0.2 7.4 1.6 1.8 100.0 56630-34 77.0 0.2 7.7 6.5 0.7 5.8 1.3 0.9 100.0 55635-39 75.8 0.2 9.2 4.3 0.0 7.0 1.7 1.7 100.0 41440-44 82.7 0.0 8.2 2.5 0.0 5.3 0.6 0.6 100.0 31845-49 76.9 0.0 10.0 4.8 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.7 100.0 29050-54 80.7 0.4 8.2 5.6 0.0 3.9 0.9 0.4 100.0 233EducationNo education 68.1 0.0 11.2 2.3 0.0 13.5 1.2 3.8 100.0 260Primary incomplete 81.3 0.1 6.9 4.3 0.4 3.8 1.4 1.9 100.0 1,024Primary complete 79.3 0.2 7.9 4.6 0.2 5.9 1.3 0.5 100.0 919Secondary+ 79.5 0.2 7.7 4.2 0.1 5.8 1.6 0.8 100.0 1,706Wealth quintileLowest 79.8 0.0 7.6 2.0 0.3 7.4 1.5 1.5 100.0 662Second 83.8 0.3 6.7 2.9 0.2 3.4 1.0 1.8 100.0 623Middle 80.8 0.0 9.2 3.3 0.2 4.4 1.2 0.9 100.0 641Fourth 79.9 0.0 7.8 4.3 0.4 5.2 1.1 1.2 100.0 807Highest 74.9 0.3 7.7 6.5 0.1 7.4 2.0 0.9 100.0 1,177Total 79.2 0.2 7.8 4.2 0.2 5.8 1.5 1.2 100.0 3,910Note: Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 man missing information on education.1Includes all dried blood spot (DBS) samples tested at the lab and for which there is a result, i.e. positive, negative, or indeterminate.Indeterminate means that the sample w<strong>en</strong>t through the <strong>en</strong>tire algorithm, but the final result was inconclusive.2Includes: 1) other results of blood collection (e.g. technical problem in the fi<strong>el</strong>d), 2) lost specim<strong>en</strong>s, 3) non corresponding bar codes, and4) other lab results such as blood not tested for technical reason, not <strong>en</strong>ough blood to complete the algorithm, etc.To further explore whether nonresponse might have an impact on the HIV seropreval<strong>en</strong>ceresults, tabulations were produced to show participation in the HIV testing by a number of othercharacteristics r<strong>el</strong>ated to HIV risk (see App<strong>en</strong>dix Tables A.3-A.6). Tables A.3 and A.4 show thecoverage of HIV testing by sociodemographic characteristics among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who wereHIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 213


interviewed. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, the proportion of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who were tested is quite uniform across groups.Despite expectations that non-response to the HIV testing compon<strong>en</strong>t might be higher among thos<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV positive, it is reassuring that coverage rates are actually slightly higher amongwom<strong>en</strong> who have ever had sex than among those who have not and are the same for m<strong>en</strong> who everhad sex and those who have not. Response rates are also uniform by marital status and type of union(polygynous or not).Coverage rates vary considerably by ethnic group, being highest among the Kisii, Embu, andMeru for wom<strong>en</strong> and Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili, Kisii, and Taita/Taveta for m<strong>en</strong>. The Maasai have the lowestcoverage, followed by the Somali. Coverage rates are notably lower among Muslim respond<strong>en</strong>ts—especially for wom<strong>en</strong>. Among m<strong>en</strong>, the coverage rate for HIV testing is almost the same forcircumcised and uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong>.Tables A.5 and A.6 show that HIV testing rates do not differ substantially by risk-r<strong>el</strong>atedvariables among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who have ever had sex. The mostly minor variations are g<strong>en</strong>erallyin the direction of having higher coverage of groups that are usually associated with higher lev<strong>el</strong>s ofHIV. For example, HIV testing coverage is higher for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> with younger age at first sexthan for those whose age at first sex is 20 or higher. Similarly, among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, coverageg<strong>en</strong>erally increases with the number of sexual partners in the previous 12 months.14.2 HIV PREVALENCE BY AGEResults from the 2008-09 KDHS indicate that 6.3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of K<strong>en</strong>yan adults age 15-49 areinfected with HIV (Table 14.3). HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce in wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 is 8.0 perc<strong>en</strong>t, while for m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49, it is 4.3 perc<strong>en</strong>t. This female-to-male ratio of 1.9 to 1 is higher than that found in mostpopulation-based studies in Africa. Young wom<strong>en</strong> are particularly vulnerable to HIV infectioncompared with young m<strong>en</strong>. For example, 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 are HIV infected, comparedwith less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-19, while HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among wom<strong>en</strong> 20-24 is over fourtimes that of m<strong>en</strong> in the same age group (6.4 perc<strong>en</strong>t vs. 1.5 perc<strong>en</strong>t—Figure 14.2). Rates amongwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> begin to converge as age increases, except for the unusually high lev<strong>el</strong> amongwom<strong>en</strong> age 40-44; preval<strong>en</strong>ce among m<strong>en</strong> rises gradually with age to peak at age 35-39. HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce is higher for wom<strong>en</strong> than m<strong>en</strong> at all ages except for the 35-39 age group.Table 14.3 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by ageAmong de facto wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 who were interviewed and tested,the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who are HIV-1 positive, by age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgePerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV-1positiveWom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV-1positiveNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV-1positiveNumber15-19 2.7 750 0.7 769 1.7 1,51920-24 6.4 729 1.5 585 4.2 1,31425-29 10.4 643 6.5 450 8.8 1,09330-34 11.0 506 6.8 443 9.1 94935-39 8.8 364 10.4 287 9.5 65140-44 14.3 344 5.7 292 10.3 63645-49 6.4 306 4.3 240 5.5 546Total 15-49 8.0 3,641 4.3 3,066 6.3 6,707Age 50-54 na 0 9.1 199 na naTotal m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na 0 4.6 3,265 na nana = Not applicable214 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


Figure 14.2 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by Age Group and Sex15Perc<strong>en</strong>t+10++,+50+ , ,,+,+,,15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Age Group+ Wom<strong>en</strong> , M<strong>en</strong>14.3 TRENDS IN HIV PREVALENCEThe 2008-09 KDHS is the third nationally-repres<strong>en</strong>tative, population-based survey to includeHIV testing. The first was the 2003 KDHS, and the second was the 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya AIDS IndicatorSurvey (NASCOP, 2009). The two KDHS surveys utilized similar methodologies, with HIV testingbased on dried blood spot samples tak<strong>en</strong> from wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54, whereas theKAIS involved taking v<strong>en</strong>ous blood samples from wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-64.Table 14.4 and Figures 14.3 and 14.4 compare HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce from all three surveys by agegroup and sex. Aside from some occasional outliers, the data show a remarkable lev<strong>el</strong> of consist<strong>en</strong>cy.Overall, HIV infection lev<strong>el</strong>s declined slightly among those age 15-49, from 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 and2007 to 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce has declined from 9 perc<strong>en</strong>tin 2003 and 2007 to 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09, while among m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce increasedfrom 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007 and th<strong>en</strong> declined to 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09.Table 14.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by agePerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 by age group, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2003 to 2008-09Age2003 KDHS 2007 KAIS 2008-09 KDHSWom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> Both sexes Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> Both sexes Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> Both sexes15-19 3.0 0.4 1.6 3.5 1.0 2.3 2.7 0.7 1.720-24 9.0 2.4 6.0 7.4 1.9 5.2 6.4 1.5 4.225-29 12.9 7.3 10.4 10.2 7.3 9.1 10.4 6.5 8.830-34 11.7 6.6 9.4 13.3 8.9 11.6 11.0 6.8 9.135-39 11.8 8.4 10.1 11.2 9.3 10.5 8.8 10.4 9.540-44 9.5 8.8 9.1 9.4 10.2 9.7 14.3 5.7 10.345-49 3.9 5.2 4.4 8.8 5.6 7.5 6.4 4.3 5.5Total 15-49 8.7 4.6 6.7 8.8 5.5 7.4 8.0 4.3 6.3Age 50-54 na 5.7 na 7.5 8.3 7.8 na 9.1 naTotal 15-54 na 4.6 na na na na na 4.6 nana = Not applicableSource: CBS, MOH, and ORC Macro, 2004, Table 13.3; NASCOP, 2009, Table 2.3.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 215


Figure 14.3 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among Wom<strong>en</strong> 15-491510Perc<strong>en</strong>t+,'+,',+ +' ,''+ ,,'5,+ '+015-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Age Group+ 2003 KDHS , 2007 KAIS ' 2008-09 KDHSFigure 14.4 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce among M<strong>en</strong> 15-4915Perc<strong>en</strong>t105+ ,',+ '',+,+'+,'0+,',+ '15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Age Group+ 2003 KDHS , 2007 KAIS ' 2008-09 KDHSIn 2003, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce peaked among wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-29 years and in 2007, the preval<strong>en</strong>cepeaked in wom<strong>en</strong> age 30-34 years. In 2008-09, preval<strong>en</strong>ce was highest among wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-44followed by those age 30-34. There was a significant increase in preval<strong>en</strong>ce among wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-44from 2003 (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and 2007 (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t) to 2008-09 (14 perc<strong>en</strong>t), which may reflect new infectionamong this cohort. Among wom<strong>en</strong> age 20-24 years, there is a decrease from 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 7perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2007 and to 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09. Among m<strong>en</strong>, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce peaked at age 40-44 yearsin 2003 (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and 2007 (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t), but was highest at age 35-39 in 2008-09 (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t).14.4 HIV PREVALENCE BY SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICSTable 14.5 shows HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by socioeconomic characteristics of the respond<strong>en</strong>ts. Ing<strong>en</strong>eral, urban respond<strong>en</strong>ts are slightly more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have HIV than are rural respond<strong>en</strong>ts (7 perc<strong>en</strong>tand 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t). However, the pattern differs by sex. Urban wom<strong>en</strong> have a considerably higher risk ofHIV infection (10 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than rural wom<strong>en</strong> (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while rural m<strong>en</strong> have a higher lev<strong>el</strong> of HIVinfection than their urban counterparts (5 perc<strong>en</strong>t vs. 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t). The latter finding differs from results216 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


in the 2003 and 2007 surveys, both of which found higher lev<strong>el</strong>s of HIV infection among urban m<strong>en</strong>than among rural m<strong>en</strong>.Table 14.5 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by socioeconomic characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were tested, by socioeconomic characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 10.4 862 3.7 798 7.2 1,660Rural 7.2 2,779 4.5 2,268 6.0 5,047ProvinceNairobi 10.8 287 3.4 297 7.0 584C<strong>en</strong>tral 6.2 405 2.6 329 4.6 733Coast 5.8 284 2.3 231 4.2 515Eastern 3.8 610 3.0 502 3.5 1,111Nyanza 16.0 599 11.4 494 13.9 1,092Rift Valley 6.3 976 2.8 818 4.7 1,794Western 9.2 394 3.4 334 6.6 728North Eastern 0.9 86 0.9 63 0.9 149EducationNo education 5.8 319 5.4 98 5.7 417Primary incomplete 9.0 1,069 3.3 849 6.5 1,918Primary complete 8.9 1,004 6.6 753 8.0 1,756Secondary and higher 6.9 1,249 3.4 1,366 5.1 2,615Employm<strong>en</strong>t (last 12 months)Not employed 4.4 1,531 1.3 367 3.8 1,898Employed 10.6 2,110 4.7 2,699 7.3 4,809Wealth quintileLowest 6.0 658 2.3 420 4.6 1,078Second 8.8 619 4.5 549 6.8 1,168Middle 6.6 626 4.5 535 5.6 1,161Fourth 7.4 815 5.6 710 6.6 1,525Highest 10.2 922 3.9 852 7.2 1,774EthnicityEmbu 2.7 58 3.2 67 3.0 126Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 2.1 520 1.4 409 1.8 929Kamba 5.5 404 2.4 346 4.1 750Kikuyu 5.9 702 1.7 545 4.1 1,246Kisii 5.1 250 4.3 221 4.7 471Luhya 12.0 558 1.9 538 7.0 1,096Luo 22.8 470 17.1 398 20.2 868Maasai (8.2) 29 (7.8) 33 7.9 62Meru 5.3 185 5.4 154 5.3 339Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 3.5 189 2.7 127 3.2 316Somali 0.8 101 0.8 69 0.8 171Taita/Taveta 3.7 41 (1.4) 31 2.7 72Other 5.0 134 1.1 127 3.1 261R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 8.0 845 3.8 805 5.9 1,650Protestant/other Christian 8.4 2,442 4.3 1,928 6.6 4,370Muslim 2.8 265 4.2 191 3.3 456No r<strong>el</strong>igion 13.4 76 3.0 123 7.0 199Total 15-49 8.0 3,641 4.3 3,066 6.3 6,707Age 50-54 na 0 9.1 199 9.1 199Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na 0 4.6 3,265 4.6 3,265Note: Total includes 1 woman and 7 m<strong>en</strong> missing information on r<strong>el</strong>igion. Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on25-49 unweighted cases.na = Not applicable1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.The HIV epidemic shows regional heterog<strong>en</strong>eity. Nyanza province has an overall preval<strong>en</strong>ceof 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t, double the lev<strong>el</strong> of the next highest provinces—Nairobi and Western, at 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t each.All other provinces have lev<strong>el</strong>s betwe<strong>en</strong> 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t overall, except North Easternprovince where the preval<strong>en</strong>ce is about 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t. G<strong>en</strong>der differ<strong>en</strong>ces in preval<strong>en</strong>ce persist in allprovinces, with wom<strong>en</strong> bearing a higher burd<strong>en</strong> of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce than m<strong>en</strong> (Figure 14.5). ComparedHIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 217


with data from the 2003 KDHS, data from most provinces show a slight decline in preval<strong>en</strong>ce, withthe exceptions of Western and North Eastern provinces, both of which show increases.Figure 14.5 HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce by G<strong>en</strong>der and Province20Perc<strong>en</strong>t151610111196 665033 243Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern Nyanza Rift Valley Western NorthEastern3311ProvinceWom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>The results show no consist<strong>en</strong>t pattern of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by education lev<strong>el</strong>. Among wom<strong>en</strong>,the highest lev<strong>el</strong> is among those with incomplete primary education (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t), while among m<strong>en</strong>,this group has the lowest lev<strong>el</strong>. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who are working have a higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIVthan do those who are not curr<strong>en</strong>tly working; 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t of employed wom<strong>en</strong> and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofemployed m<strong>en</strong> are HIV positive compared with 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> who are notemployed. HIV infection shows a t<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy to rise with wealth; wom<strong>en</strong> in the highest and m<strong>en</strong> in thefourth quintile of the wealth index have the highest rates of HIV infection.There are very large differ<strong>en</strong>ces in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by ethnicity. Among both wom<strong>en</strong> andm<strong>en</strong>, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is lowest among Somalis (less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t) and highest among the Luos(23 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49). The Maasai also have r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y high lev<strong>el</strong>sof HIV infection; however, the number of respond<strong>en</strong>ts tested is not large. The only other group withhigher than average preval<strong>en</strong>ce lev<strong>el</strong>s is the Luhya (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t), with especially high lev<strong>el</strong>s for wom<strong>en</strong>(12 perc<strong>en</strong>t). With regard to r<strong>el</strong>igion, Muslims have the lowest lev<strong>el</strong> of HIV infection (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t), andthose who have no r<strong>el</strong>igion have the highest lev<strong>el</strong> (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t).14.5 HIV PREVALENCE BY DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOURTable 14.6 gives the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV by demographic characteristics of respond<strong>en</strong>ts. HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce is by far the highest among wom<strong>en</strong> who are widowed (43 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>who are divorced or separated also have a r<strong>el</strong>ativ<strong>el</strong>y high HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce (17 and 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). The data further show that those in polygynous unions have a higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce lev<strong>el</strong>(13 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than those in non-polygynous unions or not in any union (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t each). M<strong>en</strong> inpolygynous unions are three times more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have HIV than are m<strong>en</strong> who are married but not inpolygynous unions (16 and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t).HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> is a useful b<strong>en</strong>chmark to compare with rates amongwom<strong>en</strong> tested as part of the ant<strong>en</strong>atal care s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance system. HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce amongpregnant wom<strong>en</strong> is 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t, up from 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t reported in the 2003 KDHS. The lev<strong>el</strong> is almostid<strong>en</strong>tical for wom<strong>en</strong> who are pregnant and those who are not. HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce does not vary much bywhether wom<strong>en</strong> receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal care or not. HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> whoobtained ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for their last birth at a public sector facility, 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> who218 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


obtained care from a private sector facility, and 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t for those who did not obtain ant<strong>en</strong>atal careor who had experi<strong>en</strong>ced no birth in the last 3 years.The results show that uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> are more than four times as lik<strong>el</strong>y to have HIV ascircumcised m<strong>en</strong> (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t). These findings are similar to the lev<strong>el</strong>s found in the 2003KDHS and the 2007 KAIS.Table 14.6 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by demographic characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were tested, by demographic characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09DemographiccharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberMarital statusNever married 3.7 1,133 1.5 1,468 2.4 2,601Ever had sex 6.6 530 2.0 947 3.6 1,476Never had sex 1.2 603 0.5 522 0.9 1,125Married/Living together 6.7 2,134 6.0 1,463 6.4 3,597Divorced or separated 16.8 213 9.7 116 14.3 329Widowed 43.1 162 * 18 44.4 181Type of unionIn polygynous union 11.8 265 15.7 97 12.9 362Not in polygynous union 6.0 1,839 5.3 1,363 5.7 3,202Not curr<strong>en</strong>tly in union 9.8 1,507 2.7 1,603 6.1 3,110Curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnantPregnant 8.3 241 na na na naNot pregnant or not sure 8.0 3,400 na na na naAnt<strong>en</strong>atal care (ANC) for lastbirth in the last 3 yearsANC provided by public sector 8.0 1,063 na na na naANC provided by other thanpublic sector 6.9 211 na na na naNo ANC/No birth in last 3 years 8.1 2,365 na na na naMale circumcisionCircumcised na na 2.8 2,627 na naNot circumcised na na 12.9 438 na naTotal 15-49 8.0 3,641 4.3 3,066 6.3 6,707Age 50-54 na 0 9.1 199 na naTotal m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 na 0 4.6 3,265 na naNote: Total includes 30 wom<strong>en</strong> and 2 m<strong>en</strong> with type of union missing and 1 man with circumcision informationmissing. An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicable1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.Table 14.7 examines the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV infection by sexual behaviour indicators amongrespond<strong>en</strong>ts who have ever had sexual intercourse. For wom<strong>en</strong>, there is a clear pattern of higher HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce with earlier sexual debut. For m<strong>en</strong>, however, those who initiated sexual intercourse afterage 20 have the highest HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with less than 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Among wom<strong>en</strong>, having higher risk sex (sex with a non-marital, non-cohabiting partner) isassociated with higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV infection. Among wom<strong>en</strong> having higher risk sex in the last12 months, 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t are HIV-infected, compared with 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those who are sexually active buthave not had a higher risk partner in the last 12 months. M<strong>en</strong> reporting higher-risk sex have an HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce of 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t for those not reporting higher-risk sex in the lastyear. Among wom<strong>en</strong> reporting no sex in the last year, 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t are HIV-positive, compared with 4perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> reporting no sex in the last 12 months.Among wom<strong>en</strong>, there is a negative association betwe<strong>en</strong> the number of sexual partners in th<strong>el</strong>ast 12 months and the lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of being HIV-positive. M<strong>en</strong> show the expected pattern of increasedHIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce as the number of rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual partners increases. Among wom<strong>en</strong>, having a higherriskpartner in the preceding 12 months is associated with higher HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t) thanHIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 219


having no higher-risk partners (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Surprisingly, among m<strong>en</strong>, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce declines as th<strong>en</strong>umber of higher-risk partners increases.Table 14.7 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by sexual behaviourPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV-positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who ever had sex and were tested for HIV, by sexualbehaviour characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Sexual behaviourcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberAge at first sexual intercourse


The r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> condom use and HIV infection is not the expected pattern. Amongwom<strong>en</strong>, any condom use, condom use at the most rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual <strong>en</strong>counter, and condom use at themost rec<strong>en</strong>t higher-risk sexual <strong>en</strong>counter are all associated with a much higher lev<strong>el</strong> of HIV infectionthan among those who did not use condoms, while for m<strong>en</strong>, condom use is associated with only asomewhat higher lev<strong>el</strong> of infection. Without asking for a complete sexual history, it is not possible tocontrol for the timing of condom use r<strong>el</strong>ative to HIV infection. It is lik<strong>el</strong>y that those who suspect theyor their partner might be infected would also be more lik<strong>el</strong>y to use condoms, thus reversing theexpected direction of the r<strong>el</strong>ationship of lower HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among those who use condoms. Thehigher the number of lifetime sexual partners, the higher the lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of having HIV, especiallyamong wom<strong>en</strong>; among m<strong>en</strong>, the r<strong>el</strong>ationship is not so strong. The number of respond<strong>en</strong>ts who paid forsex in the 12 months before the survey is too small to make meaningful conclusions.14.6 HIV PREVALENCE AMONG YOUTHTable 14.8 shows HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among young people by background characteristics. Thedata show that 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of youth age 15-24 are HIV-positive. Young wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 are morevulnerable to HIV infection than m<strong>en</strong> of the same age. The results indicate that wom<strong>en</strong> of this agegroup are four times more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV positive than m<strong>en</strong> (almost 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce increases with age, from less than 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t among youth age 15-17 to almost6 perc<strong>en</strong>t among those age 23-24. The absolute increase by age is more appar<strong>en</strong>t for young wom<strong>en</strong>than m<strong>en</strong>; 8 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 23-24 have HIV. The small number of young people who areeither divorced, separated, or widowed have a much higher HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce (22 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than thosewho are married or living together with their partner (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Youth who have never married havethe lowest preval<strong>en</strong>ce (2 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among the never-married youth, those who report that they haveever had sex have a higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce than those who report that they have never had sex (2 and 1perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). There is HIV infection reported ev<strong>en</strong> among those who have never had sex.This implies some lev<strong>el</strong> of infection by a nonsexual means of transmission, such as unsafe injectionsor other blood-borne means. It is also possible that some young, unmarried wom<strong>en</strong> d<strong>el</strong>iberat<strong>el</strong>yunderreported their sexual experi<strong>en</strong>ce.HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is higher among young pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> than among non-pregnant youngwom<strong>en</strong> (6 perc<strong>en</strong>t versus 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t). There is no significant differ<strong>en</strong>ce in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce amongyouth in urban and rural areas. Nyanza province has the highest HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among youth (8perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by Nairobi (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and C<strong>en</strong>tral, North Eastern, and Coast provinces have th<strong>el</strong>owest preval<strong>en</strong>ce at 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t each. As in the g<strong>en</strong>eral population, Nyanza has the highest preval<strong>en</strong>cefor both young wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> (11 and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is higher amongyouth with no education and among youth in the middle wealth quintile.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 221


Table 14.8 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among young people by background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV-positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who were tested for HIV, by backgroundcharacteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberAge15-19 2.7 750 0.7 769 1.7 1,51915-17 2.8 433 0.5 425 1.7 85818-19 2.7 317 1.0 344 1.8 66120-24 6.4 729 1.5 585 4.2 1,31420-22 5.3 466 1.0 383 3.4 84923-24 8.3 262 2.4 202 5.7 465Marital statusNever married 2.3 927 1.0 1,250 1.5 2,177Ever had sex 3.9 345 1.3 742 2.1 1,087Never had sex 1.3 582 0.5 508 0.9 1,090Married/living together 6.8 499 1.5 96 5.9 595Divorced/separated/widowed 23.8 53 * 7 22.1 60Curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnantPregnant 5.9 113 na na na naNot pregnant or not sure 4.4 1,365 na na na naResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 4.8 333 0.8 265 3.0 598Rural 4.5 1,146 1.1 1,089 2.8 2,235ProvinceNairobi 5.0 106 0.2 102 2.6 209C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.7 151 0.8 140 0.8 291Coast 2.1 124 0.0 75 1.3 199Eastern 2.9 225 1.6 263 2.2 488Nyanza 11.4 287 3.1 255 7.5 542Rift Valley 2.9 380 0.0 322 1.6 702Western 4.5 170 0.3 172 2.4 342North Eastern 0.8 35 1.2 24 1.0 59EducationNo education 5.3 83 (0.0) 21 4.2 104Primary incomplete 5.0 502 1.1 474 3.1 976Primary complete 5.3 366 1.6 294 3.7 660Secondary and higher 3.5 527 0.8 565 2.1 1,092Wealth quintileLowest 5.0 261 0.4 193 3.1 454Second 3.9 261 0.6 275 2.2 536Middle 5.9 260 2.4 272 4.1 532Fourth 3.9 353 1.2 342 2.6 695Highest 4.3 343 0.3 272 2.6 615Total 4.5 1,478 1.1 1,354 2.9 2,833Note: Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based onfewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicable1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.Table 14.9 shows the HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among youth by sexual behaviour. In the survey,wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 were asked the age of their first sexual partner. Results show that there is nodiffer<strong>en</strong>ce in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 whose first sexual partner was 10 or moreyears older and those whose partners were either less than 10 years older, younger, or the same age (7perc<strong>en</strong>t for both categories).Surprisingly, HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce is higher among youth who had sexual intercourse in the 12months before the survey but not higher-risk sex (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than among those who had higher-risksexual intercourse (2 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Ev<strong>en</strong> more surprising, young people who reported no sexualintercourse in the 12 months before the survey have a preval<strong>en</strong>ce of 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t, which is higher thanfor those who had higher-risk intercourse. This pattern varies by sex. Wom<strong>en</strong> who reported not havingsex at all in the 12 months before the survey are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV-positive (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t) thanwom<strong>en</strong> who had sex, but not higher-risk sex (8 perc<strong>en</strong>t), who in turn, are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV-222 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


positive than wom<strong>en</strong> who had higher-risk sex (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Among m<strong>en</strong>, there is very little variation inthe lev<strong>el</strong> of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among respective categories. Data by the number of sexual partners andnumber of higher-risk partners in the 12 months before the survey also imply that HIV infection lev<strong>el</strong>sare higher among young wom<strong>en</strong> with no such partners than among those with 1 or more partners.Table 14.9 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among young people by sexual behaviourPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV-positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-24 who ever had sex and were tested for HIV, by sexualbehaviour, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Sexual behaviourcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberR<strong>el</strong>ative age of first sexual partner10+ years older 6.6 86 na na na na


it is possible that some respond<strong>en</strong>ts know that they have HIV and use condoms to protect theirpartners, thus leading to higher preval<strong>en</strong>ce among condom users.14.7 HIV PREVALENCE BY OTHER CHARACTERISTICSTable 14.10 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who are HIV-positive bywhether they had a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the 12 months before the survey and bywhether they had ever be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who had an STI or STIsymptoms in the 12 months before the survey are more than twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV-positive (18perc<strong>en</strong>t) than respond<strong>en</strong>ts who did not have an STI or STI symptoms (7 perc<strong>en</strong>t). This pattern issimilar for both sexes. Overall, respond<strong>en</strong>ts who ever had sex and who have be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV atsome time before the survey are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be HIV-positive than sexually active adults who hav<strong>en</strong>ever be<strong>en</strong> tested (9 and 5 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Among those who have ever be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV,preval<strong>en</strong>ce is higher among those who never received the result of their last test (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t) thanamong those who received the results of their last test (9 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 14.10 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by other characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV positive among wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who ever had sex and were tested for HIV, bywhether had an STI in the past 12 months and by prior testing for HIV, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09CharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalNumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1NumberSexually transmitted infectionin past 12 monthsHad STI or STI symptoms 19.7 176 11.2 56 17.6 231No STI, no symptoms 8.7 2,846 4.9 2,478 6.9 5,324Prior HIV testingEver tested 10.8 2,065 6.7 1,200 9.3 3,265Received results 10.6 2,003 6.6 1,154 9.1 3,157Did not receive results 17.1 62 (7.8) 45 13.2 108Never tested 6.3 961 3.6 1,343 4.7 2,304Total 15-49 9.3 3,037 5.0 2,544 7.4 5,581Note: Total includes 16 wom<strong>en</strong> and 10 m<strong>en</strong> missing information on STIs and 11 wom<strong>en</strong> and 1 man missinginformation on prior HIV testing. Figures in par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.na = Not applicable1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.Table 14.11 shows details about prior HIV testing history and curr<strong>en</strong>t HIV status. Resultsshow that HIV-positive adults are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to know their status than HIV-negative adults. Almostsev<strong>en</strong> in t<strong>en</strong> HIV-positive adults report that they had previously be<strong>en</strong> tested for HIV and had receivedthe results of their most rec<strong>en</strong>t test. This compares to only about half of HIV-negative adults. Theperc<strong>en</strong>tage of HIV-positive respond<strong>en</strong>ts who had previously be<strong>en</strong> tested and received results is higheramong wom<strong>en</strong> than m<strong>en</strong> (74 and 59 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). Similarly, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of HIV-negativerespond<strong>en</strong>ts who had previously be<strong>en</strong> tested and received results is also higher among wom<strong>en</strong> (57perc<strong>en</strong>t) than m<strong>en</strong> (40 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Looking at tr<strong>en</strong>ds, it is <strong>en</strong>couraging that an increasing proportion of HIV-positive adults ar<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y to know their status. The perc<strong>en</strong>tage of HIV-positive wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who were previouslytested and received the results of their last test has increased from just b<strong>el</strong>ow 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 69perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09 (CBS et al., 2004).224 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 14.11 Prior HIV testing by curr<strong>en</strong>t HIV statusPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by HIV testing status prior to the survey, accordingto whether HIV positive or negative, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-2009HIV testing prior to the surveyHIVpositive 1Wom<strong>en</strong> M<strong>en</strong> TotalHIVnegativeHIVpositive 1HIVnegativeHIVpositive 1HIVnegativePreviously tested, receivedresult of last test 73.5 56.5 58.6 39.9 68.9 48.7Previously tested, did notreceive result of last test 3.7 2.2 2.7 1.9 3.4 2.1Not previously tested 22.8 40.0 38.6 57.9 27.7 48.4Missing 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.9Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number 291 3,350 130 2,936 421 6,2861HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.14.8 HIV PREVALENCE BY MALE CIRCUMCISIONMale circumcision has be<strong>en</strong> shown to have a protective effect against HIV infection (Agot etal., 2004). Table 14.12 pres<strong>en</strong>ts survey data on HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by male circumcision status. Theresults show that there is a strong r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce and circumcision status, withHIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce more than four times higher among uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> than among circumcised m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 (13 and 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t).The data show that although HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce t<strong>en</strong>ds to increase with age among bothcircumcised and uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong>, the increase is far steeper among uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong>. There ar<strong>el</strong>arge differ<strong>en</strong>ces in HIV infection lev<strong>el</strong>s betwe<strong>en</strong> circumcised and uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> in both urbanand rural areas. For example, in rural areas, 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t of uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 are HIVpositivecompared with only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of circumcised m<strong>en</strong>.There are also much higher lev<strong>el</strong>s of HIV infection among uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> thancircumcised m<strong>en</strong> by education lev<strong>el</strong> and for all five wealth quintiles. Comparison of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ceby province, ethnicity, and r<strong>el</strong>igion are hampered by the small number of m<strong>en</strong> who are notcircumcised.According to these bivariate data, male circumcision appears to have a very strongr<strong>el</strong>ationship with HIV in K<strong>en</strong>ya. However, circumcision is intertwined with ethnicity, place ofresid<strong>en</strong>ce, and other factors that are indirectly associated with HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce. For example, inChapter 13 it was observed that male circumcision is much less common among the Luos (Table13.11). The Luo ethnic group also has the highest preval<strong>en</strong>ce of HIV. As shown in Table 14.5, 17perc<strong>en</strong>t of Luo m<strong>en</strong> are infected with HIV as compared with 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all K<strong>en</strong>yan m<strong>en</strong>. Although itmay seem that low rates of circumcision may account for much of this differ<strong>en</strong>ce, surprisingly, Luom<strong>en</strong> who are circumcised have roughly the same HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce as Luo m<strong>en</strong> who are uncircumcised(16 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t). These findings indicate that multivariate analysis includingcircumcision status and risk factors for HIV transmission is needed to better understand ther<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> circumcision and HIV transmission in K<strong>en</strong>ya.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 225


Table 14.12 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce by male circumcisionAmong m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who were tested for HIV, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage HIV positive bywhether circumcised, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicCircumcisedPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1 NumberNot circumcisedPerc<strong>en</strong>tageHIV positive 1 NumberAge15-19 0.2 583 2.4 18620-24 0.9 519 6.3 6725-29 3.5 383 23.9 6730-34 5.5 391 17.3 5135-39 7.7 262 (39.5) 2540-44 3.4 271 (34.6) 2145-49 1.8 218 (28.7) 22Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 3.4 747 8.7 81Rural 2.9 2,057 14.6 379ProvinceNairobi 3.6 274 7.7 34C<strong>en</strong>tral 2.3 338 * 12Coast 2.5 236 * 7Eastern 2.6 530 * 20Nyanza 5.8 240 16.6 282Rift Valley 3.1 783 9.1 82Western 3.2 333 5.4 23North Eastern 0.8 71 * 0EducationNo education 0.3 84 * 14Primary incomplete 2.2 675 7.9 174Primary complete 3.6 640 24.2 111Secondary and higher 2.9 1,227 8.0 139Wealth quintileLowest 1.3 345 6.9 75Second 2.9 442 10.7 107Middle 2.5 454 15.2 82Fourth 3.2 623 23.0 85Highest 3.3 763 9.0 89EthnicityEmbu 3.3 66 * 2Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 1.5 382 * 27Kamba 2.5 343 * 4Kikuyu 1.6 533 * 12Kisii 4.4 214 * 7Luhya 2.0 516 (1.0) 22Luo 16.4 86 17.3 313Maasai (8.8) 29 * 4Meru 5.1 138 * 14Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 2.7 126 * 1Somali 0.8 69 * 0Taita/Taveta (1.4) 31 * 0Other 1.1 94 (1.1) 33R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 2.5 673 10.7 132Protestant/other Christian 2.5 1,644 15.0 283Muslim 4.3 183 * 7No r<strong>el</strong>igion 3.3 112 * 11Total 15-49 2.8 2,627 12.9 438Age 50-54 7.0 177 * 22Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 3.1 2,804 13.6 460Note: Total includes 7 circumcised m<strong>en</strong> missing information on r<strong>el</strong>igion. Figuresin par<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases; an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes afigure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.226 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


14.9 HIV PREVALENCE AMONG COUPLESIn the 2008-09 KDHS, more than 1,250 cohabiting couples were interviewed and tested forHIV. Table 14.13 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of couples living in the same household, both ofwhom were tested for HIV, by their HIV status, according to background characteristics. The coupleswere linked to each other before personal id<strong>en</strong>tifiers (such as household and cluster numbers) were‘scrambled’, the r<strong>el</strong>evant pages of the household questionnaire were destroyed, and the results of theHIV test were merged with the data from the questionnaires. Therefore, no individual or couple’s HIVstatus can be traced back to them.Table 14.13 HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce among couplesPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of couples living in the same household, both of whom were tested for HIV, by the HIV status,according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicBoth HIVpositive 1Man HIVpositive,woman HIVnegative 1Woman HIVpositive,man HIVnegative 1Both HIVnegative Total NumberWoman’s age15-19 7.8 2.9 5.4 83.9 100.0 4520-29 2.8 2.7 3.6 90.9 100.0 60030-39 3.1 2.2 2.7 92.0 100.0 39540-49 1.5 2.1 2.2 94.2 100.0 212Man’s age15-19 * * * * 100.0 020-29 3.7 2.3 3.6 90.4 100.0 28730-39 2.8 2.2 3.2 91.7 100.0 47440-49 2.5 2.2 2.3 93.1 100.0 36750-54 2.1 4.3 4.6 89.1 100.0 124Age differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> partnersWoman older 1.3 2.9 0.6 95.2 100.0 48Same age/man older by 0-4 years 3.2 1.5 3.4 91.9 100.0 469Man older by 5-9 years 2.7 2.3 1.8 93.2 100.0 505Man older by 10-14 years 3.6 2.6 6.9 86.8 100.0 156Man older by 15+ years 1.3 8.7 4.5 85.5 100.0 74Type of unionMonogamous 2.8 2.3 2.8 92.0 100.0 1,148Polygynous 3.4 4.3 6.9 85.3 100.0 82Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 3.3 1.0 5.6 90.1 100.0 346Rural 2.6 3.0 2.2 92.1 100.0 906ProvinceNairobi 3.5 1.1 9.5 86.0 100.0 111C<strong>en</strong>tral 1.1 1.2 1.4 96.4 100.0 121Coast 0.5 1.7 4.5 93.2 100.0 89Eastern 3.1 1.3 1.6 94.0 100.0 201Nyanza 7.1 9.1 4.3 79.5 100.0 202Rift Valley 1.5 1.1 2.1 95.3 100.0 375Western 2.9 1.1 2.5 93.5 100.0 122North Eastern 1.0 0.0 1.8 97.2 100.0 31Woman’s educationNo education 1.5 1.9 0.6 95.9 100.0 90Primary incomplete 3.1 2.7 3.5 90.6 100.0 753Primary complete 2.8 2.2 3.0 92.0 100.0 327Secondary+ 2.1 1.5 3.2 93.3 100.0 82Man’s educationNo education 6.1 0.0 1.7 92.3 100.0 61Primary incomplete 2.8 3.4 3.1 90.6 100.0 643Primary complete 2.5 1.6 3.1 92.8 100.0 396Secondary+ 2.3 1.6 4.1 92.0 100.0 152Wealth quintileLowest 0.7 2.1 3.0 94.1 100.0 213Second 3.9 2.8 2.4 91.0 100.0 210Middle 3.0 2.7 0.3 94.0 100.0 209Fourth 3.4 3.0 2.4 91.3 100.0 246Highest 3.0 2.0 5.8 89.2 100.0 374Total 2.8 2.5 3.2 91.5 100.0 1,252Note: Table based on couples for which a valid test result (positive or negative) is available for both partners. Totalincludes 22 couples with type of union missing or inconsist<strong>en</strong>t.1HIV positive refers only to individuals infected with HIV-1.HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce | 227


For the vast majority of couples (92 perc<strong>en</strong>t), both the woman and the man are HIV-negative.For 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of cohabitating couples, both partners are HIV-positive, and 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of couples are‘discordant’, with one partner infected and the other uninfected. These discordant couples are at highrisk for HIV transmission, especially if they do not mutually know their HIV status or do not usecondoms consist<strong>en</strong>tly.Data show that the couples who are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to be affected by HIV include those in whichthe woman is very young (15-19), those in which the man is t<strong>en</strong> or more years older than the woman,polygynous couples, and those in Nyanza province and Nairobi province.Discordant couples are almost equally divided by which partner is infected, with just under 3perc<strong>en</strong>t being cases in which the man is HIV-positive and the woman is negative and just over 3perc<strong>en</strong>t being cases in which the woman is HIV-positive and the man is negative. Discordance is morecommon in partnerships in which the man is more than 15 years older than the woman (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t)and in polygynous partnerships (11 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Discordance also varies by province, with Nyanzaprovince having the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of discordant couples (13 perc<strong>en</strong>t) followed by Nairobi province (11perc<strong>en</strong>t). Notably, one in five couples in Nyanza province is directly affected by HIV infection.Overall, there is about twice the number of couples that are discordant for HIV as there is the numberof couples that are both infected. This repres<strong>en</strong>ts an unmet HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion need for the countrybecause the vast majority of these couples do not mutually know their HIV status.14.10 DISTRIBUTION OF THE HIV BURDEN IN KENYAThe HIV testing in a g<strong>en</strong>eral population sample though the KDHS allows a more preciseestimate of the burd<strong>en</strong> of HIV in K<strong>en</strong>ya and permits the calibration of estimates of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>cebased on s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance in pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>. K<strong>en</strong>ya has a heterog<strong>en</strong>eous HIV epidemic, withlarge differ<strong>en</strong>ces by region. Three provinces, containing half of K<strong>en</strong>ya’s population, have 65 perc<strong>en</strong>tof the HIV infections: Nyanza province has over one-third, Rift Valley province has one-fifth, andNairobi province has one-t<strong>en</strong>th of HIV infections in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Higher educational lev<strong>el</strong> does not protectone from HIV infection in K<strong>en</strong>ya; HIV has spread through all regions and strata of society.The linkage of biological and behavioural data in this survey has str<strong>en</strong>gth<strong>en</strong>ed the validity ofthis survey by making in-depth analysis possible. The measurem<strong>en</strong>t of HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce in the KDHShas prov<strong>en</strong> useful in calibrating HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce estimates of the g<strong>en</strong>eral population from s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong>surveillance in pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> and has resulted in downward projections of the severity of theepidemic in K<strong>en</strong>ya. These adjustm<strong>en</strong>ts arise from a better understanding of rural-urban populationdistribution, from recognition that rural pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> who do not seek ANC care have lower ratesthan wom<strong>en</strong> who do, and, most important, from acknowledgem<strong>en</strong>t of the high ratio of 1.9 wom<strong>en</strong>infected for every man.This linkage betwe<strong>en</strong> HIV test results and demographic and behavioural data also <strong>en</strong>hancesthe understanding of the distribution, patterns, and risk factors, of HIV in K<strong>en</strong>ya, with the pot<strong>en</strong>tialfor improved planning and implem<strong>en</strong>tation of programs as a result of this information. The high rateof HIV in uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong> supports the need to evaluate possible causal links betwe<strong>en</strong> lack ofmale circumcision and HIV. Finally, the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of couples that are discordant for HIVunderscores the need for knowledge of both one’s own HIV status and that of one’s partner to prev<strong>en</strong>tthe continued spread of the HIV epidemic.228 | HIV Preval<strong>en</strong>ce


WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT AND DEMOGRAPHICAND HEALTH OUTCOMES 15Vane Lumumba, Rosemary Kong’ani, and Robert BulumaThe Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Questionnaire of the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS)collected data on the g<strong>en</strong>eral background characteristics of wom<strong>en</strong> (e.g., age, education, wealthquintile, and employm<strong>en</strong>t status) and also collected data on characteristics specific to wom<strong>en</strong>’sempowerm<strong>en</strong>t status (e.g., receipt of cash earnings, magnitude of cash earnings, r<strong>el</strong>ative to those of ahusband or partner 1 , and control over cash earnings). Participation in household decision-making andattitudes towards wife beating were also assessed.In addition to answering questions about their employm<strong>en</strong>t, m<strong>en</strong> who participated in thesurvey gave information about their attitudes toward specific household decisions and alsocomm<strong>en</strong>ted on actions, such as wife beating and whether a man is justified in taking certain actions ifhis wife refuses to have sex with him. Additionally, married m<strong>en</strong> who received earnings in cash wereasked about control over their cash income.In this report, two separate indices of empowerm<strong>en</strong>t were dev<strong>el</strong>oped based on the number ofhousehold decisions in which the woman participates and her attitudes towards wife beating. Theranking of wom<strong>en</strong> on these two indices is th<strong>en</strong> r<strong>el</strong>ated to s<strong>el</strong>ected demographic and health outcomes,including contraceptive use, ideal family size, unmet need for contraception, and maternal and childhealth care.15.1 EMPLOYMENT AND FORM OF EARNINGSEmploym<strong>en</strong>t can be a source of empowerm<strong>en</strong>t for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, especially if it putsthem in control of income. In the KDHS, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked whether they wereemployed at the time of the survey and if not, whether they were employed in the 12 monthspreceding the survey 2 . Table 15.1 shows details of employm<strong>en</strong>t and cash earnings of curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedwom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> who were employed in the 12 months preceding the survey. Two in three curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 are employed compared with 99 perc<strong>en</strong>t of married m<strong>en</strong>. Younger wom<strong>en</strong>,especially those age 15-19 and age 20-24, are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to be employed than are wom<strong>en</strong> in other agegroups, possibly due to their being in school or in training rather than in the job market. As wom<strong>en</strong>get older, their lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of being employed increases from 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 to78 perc<strong>en</strong>t among wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-44.Of those employed, 61 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> and 75 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 are paid only incash for their work. More than one-quarter (26 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> are not paid for their workcompared with 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>.1 For the rest of this chapter the term ‘husband’ refers to both the curr<strong>en</strong>t/most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband (forcurr<strong>en</strong>tly/formerly legally married wom<strong>en</strong>) and to the curr<strong>en</strong>t/most rec<strong>en</strong>t partner (for wom<strong>en</strong> curr<strong>en</strong>tly living orwho formerly lived together with their partners in informal union).2 ‘Curr<strong>en</strong>tly employed’ is defined as having done work in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days. It includes persons who did notwork in the past sev<strong>en</strong> days but who are regularly employed and were abs<strong>en</strong>t from work for leave, illness,vacation, or any other such reason.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 229


Table 15.1 Employm<strong>en</strong>t and cash earnings of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, age 15-49, who were employed at any time in the last 12 months and theperc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> employed in the last 12 months by type of earnings, according toage, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgePerc<strong>en</strong>tageemployedNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>/m<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married respond<strong>en</strong>tsemployed in the last 12 months, by type of earningsCash onlyCash andin-kindWOMENIn-kindonly Not paid MissingTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>/m<strong>en</strong>15-19 40.3 212 50.7 10.7 7.2 31.3 0.0 100.0 8520-24 54.4 958 56.8 7.8 3.1 32.2 0.0 100.0 52125-29 66.3 1,088 61.5 12.1 1.6 24.5 0.3 100.0 72230-34 71.4 962 63.6 12.7 1.3 22.4 0.0 100.0 68835-39 71.3 694 62.7 10.6 0.9 25.3 0.4 100.0 49440-44 78.1 548 65.4 12.5 0.6 21.6 0.0 100.0 42745-49 73.3 466 54.5 14.9 0.4 30.3 0.0 100.0 342Total 15-49 66.6 4,928 60.9 11.6 1.6 25.8 0.1 100.0 3,280MEN15-19 * 3 * * * * * 100.0 320-24 100.0 100 71.1 7.8 0.6 20.5 0.0 100.0 10025-29 99.6 296 77.2 7.1 2.8 12.9 0.0 100.0 29530-34 98.0 384 76.7 8.7 1.7 12.8 0.0 100.0 37635-39 99.0 294 80.2 5.6 1.9 12.3 0.0 100.0 29140-44 99.6 279 68.8 9.3 4.5 17.4 0.0 100.0 27745-49 99.1 236 74.6 8.5 3.4 13.5 0.0 100.0 234Total 15-49 99.1 1,592 75.4 7.8 2.6 14.1 0.0 100.0 1,578M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 98.9 187 59.6 13.3 8.3 18.8 0.0 100.0 185Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 99.1 1,780 73.7 8.4 3.2 14.6 0.0 100.0 1,763Note: An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that have be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.15.2 CONTROLS OVER EARNINGS15.2.1 Control over Wife’s EarningsCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married and employed wom<strong>en</strong> who earn cash for their work were asked the r<strong>el</strong>ativemagnitude of their earnings compared with their husband’s earnings. In addition, they were askedwho the main decisionmaker is with regard to the use of their earnings. This information may providesome insight into wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t within the family and the ext<strong>en</strong>t of their control overdecision-making in the household. It is expected that employm<strong>en</strong>t and earnings are more lik<strong>el</strong>y toempower wom<strong>en</strong> if wom<strong>en</strong> thems<strong>el</strong>ves control their own earnings and perceive their earnings assignificant r<strong>el</strong>ative to those of their husbands or partners.Table 15.2.1 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> who received cashearnings in the past 12 months, by the person who controls their earnings and by their perception ofthe magnitude of their earnings r<strong>el</strong>ative to those of their husband’s. Overall, 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> saythat they mainly decide how their cash earnings are used, 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t indicate that the decision is madejointly with their husband, and 9 perc<strong>en</strong>t say that the allocation of their earnings is decided mainly bytheir husbands. Table 15.2.1 also shows that 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> earn more than their husbands, 65perc<strong>en</strong>t earn less than their husbands, and 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t earn about the same amount as their husbands.Four perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> say that their husbands have no cash earnings.There is no clear pattern on the use of cash earnings according to the woman’s age. However,wom<strong>en</strong> with more childr<strong>en</strong>, those with no education, and those in the lowest wealth quintile are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than other wom<strong>en</strong> to mainly decide thems<strong>el</strong>ves how their earnings are used. Wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanzaprovince are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces to decide on their own how to use their cashearnings (55 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t or lower). On the other hand, wom<strong>en</strong> with fewerchildr<strong>en</strong>, those who live in urban areas, those with some secondary or higher education, and those inthe wealthiest quintile, are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than other wom<strong>en</strong> to make decisions jointly with their spouses.230 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


Table 15.2.1 Control over wom<strong>en</strong>’s cash earnings and r<strong>el</strong>ative magnitude of wom<strong>en</strong>’s earnings: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, age 15-49, who received cash earnings for employm<strong>en</strong>t in the 12 months preceding thesurvey, by person who decides how wife’s cash earnings are used and by whether she earned more or less than her husband, according tobackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerson who decides how the wife’scash earnings are used:MainlywifeWifeandhusband Mainlyjointly husband Other Total More LessWom<strong>en</strong>’s cash earnings compared withhusband’s cash earnings:AboutthesameHusband/partnerhas noearningsDon’tknow/missingTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 36.9 55.5 7.6 0.0 100.0 1.6 86.1 11.3 0.0 1.0 100.0 5220-24 46.9 45.5 7.4 0.1 100.0 7.4 73.8 12.7 3.5 2.6 100.0 33725-29 37.2 51.0 11.8 0.0 100.0 12.5 63.4 20.0 2.1 2.1 100.0 53130-34 40.1 53.5 6.2 0.2 100.0 11.4 67.8 16.9 2.0 2.0 100.0 52435-39 47.8 43.3 8.5 0.4 100.0 20.0 64.2 12.0 2.4 1.4 100.0 36340-44 44.0 47.6 8.4 0.0 100.0 11.8 58.7 19.3 8.5 1.7 100.0 33345-49 42.6 46.4 10.9 0.0 100.0 17.9 55.9 18.9 5.1 2.2 100.0 237Number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>0 39.9 56.6 3.5 0.0 100.0 11.9 69.4 12.5 2.9 3.3 100.0 1501-2 41.2 50.8 7.7 0.2 100.0 9.4 71.0 15.5 1.7 2.5 100.0 8453-4 42.3 50.1 7.6 0.0 100.0 15.9 59.8 18.2 4.6 1.4 100.0 7845+ 44.5 42.2 13.2 0.2 100.0 14.0 62.5 17.3 4.5 1.7 100.0 599Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 41.0 52.0 6.9 0.1 100.0 11.8 67.8 14.4 3.4 2.6 100.0 702Rural 42.9 47.4 9.6 0.2 100.0 13.3 63.9 17.6 3.5 1.7 100.0 1,676ProvinceNairobi 39.3 55.9 4.8 0.0 100.0 15.5 67.0 10.4 3.3 3.8 100.0 221C<strong>en</strong>tral 36.6 60.0 3.4 0.0 100.0 12.9 57.2 27.5 1.5 1.0 100.0 365Coast 47.7 39.3 12.9 0.1 100.0 9.8 70.5 10.7 4.6 4.4 100.0 199Eastern 46.3 46.0 7.7 0.0 100.0 13.2 63.4 21.3 0.9 1.3 100.0 318Nyanza 54.8 35.5 9.1 0.5 100.0 12.8 68.5 14.1 0.1 4.5 100.0 304Rift Valley 34.7 53.5 11.6 0.2 100.0 12.2 66.8 14.0 6.7 0.2 100.0 665Western 48.6 41.5 9.9 0.0 100.0 14.1 65.4 15.7 2.4 2.3 100.0 291North Eastern 36.2 49.8 14.0 0.0 100.0 13.2 38.2 13.4 33.1 2.1 100.0 16EducationNo education 51.8 33.8 14.4 0.0 100.0 15.3 61.1 8.5 12.8 2.4 100.0 197Primary incomplete 47.3 38.9 13.4 0.4 100.0 12.2 65.0 19.0 1.6 2.3 100.0 599Primary complete 41.9 51.1 6.8 0.1 100.0 9.7 67.1 19.5 2.3 1.5 100.0 699Secondary+ 37.2 56.9 5.9 0.0 100.0 15.4 64.4 14.7 3.6 2.0 100.0 883Wealth quintileLowest 52.2 31.8 16.0 0.0 100.0 14.9 60.6 14.7 8.0 1.7 100.0 292Second 48.8 40.1 10.7 0.4 100.0 11.3 65.8 17.6 2.8 2.6 100.0 361Middle 36.2 53.7 10.1 0.0 100.0 11.7 60.5 22.2 3.4 2.2 100.0 436Fourth 43.2 49.9 6.5 0.4 100.0 14.3 65.2 17.0 2.3 1.3 100.0 499Highest 38.6 55.5 5.9 0.0 100.0 12.6 68.8 13.7 2.8 2.1 100.0 789Total 42.3 48.8 8.8 0.2 100.0 12.9 65.0 16.7 3.5 2.0 100.0 2,37815.2.2 Control over Husband’s EarningsTable 15.2.2 shows data about control over the husband’s cash earnings from both the wife’sand the husband’s perspectives, by background characteristics. Among curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who receive cash earnings, more than half (53 perc<strong>en</strong>t) decide jointly with their wife how theirearnings will be used, while 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t say they mainly make decisions thems<strong>el</strong>ves. Only a smallproportion of m<strong>en</strong> (3 perc<strong>en</strong>t) say that decisions on how their earnings are used are mainly made bytheir wives.There are few distinct patterns on how a husband’s earnings are used. However, younger m<strong>en</strong>,m<strong>en</strong> with no childr<strong>en</strong>, and those who live in urban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than other m<strong>en</strong> to have themain say in the use of their cash income. Married m<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province (73 perc<strong>en</strong>t) are most lik<strong>el</strong>yto make joint decisions on how to use their money, whereas in Nairobi province, 77 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong>make such decisions indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>tly.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 231


It is interesting to note that wives have a differ<strong>en</strong>t view with regard to the control over theirhusband’s cash earnings. While the overall proportions do not vary much betwe<strong>en</strong> m<strong>en</strong> and wom<strong>en</strong>;there are sizeable discrepancies in views among some sub-groups. For example, the vast majority ofmarried m<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi who earn cash say they mainly make decisions as to how to use their earnings,while married wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi whose husbands earn cash are lik<strong>el</strong>y to say that decisions on use ofhis earnings are made jointly.Table 15.2.2 Control over m<strong>en</strong>’s cash earningsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distributions of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who receive cash earnings and of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 whose husbandsreceive cash earnings, by person who decides how m<strong>en</strong>’s cash earnings are used, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicMainlywifeHusbandand wifejointlyM<strong>en</strong>Mainlyhusband Other Total NumberMainlywifeHusbandand wifejointlyWom<strong>en</strong>Mainlyhusband Other Total NumberAge15-19 * * * * 100.0 3 10.6 41.0 48.4 0.0 100.0 20520-24 5.9 34.3 58.2 1.6 100.0 79 6.2 54.1 39.4 0.3 100.0 92725-29 3.5 57.3 39.0 0.2 100.0 249 7.5 53.5 38.9 0.1 100.0 1,06330-34 3.3 51.0 44.3 1.5 100.0 322 4.8 58.3 36.2 0.8 100.0 93735-39 2.1 51.7 46.2 0.0 100.0 250 8.2 50.9 40.8 0.1 100.0 67140-44 0.4 50.0 49.6 0.0 100.0 217 4.5 55.7 39.7 0.0 100.0 51045-49 1.7 60.7 37.6 0.0 100.0 194 10.2 48.6 40.6 0.7 100.0 436Number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>0 5.2 44.0 50.9 0.0 100.0 108 5.5 60.8 33.1 0.6 100.0 2871-2 3.1 53.1 42.7 1.1 100.0 478 7.1 56.1 36.7 0.1 100.0 1,7193-4 2.2 52.1 45.3 0.4 100.0 450 6.5 54.2 39.0 0.3 100.0 1,5035+ 1.1 55.6 43.2 0.0 100.0 278 7.4 47.1 45.0 0.4 100.0 1,241Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 2.5 45.1 52.2 0.1 100.0 508 8.0 55.8 36.1 0.1 100.0 1,118Rural 2.6 57.3 39.4 0.8 100.0 805 6.5 52.7 40.4 0.4 100.0 3,633ProvinceNairobi 2.1 21.3 76.6 0.0 100.0 164 4.5 50.9 44.5 0.1 100.0 352C<strong>en</strong>tral 7.8 72.9 19.3 0.0 100.0 137 6.6 70.1 23.3 0.0 100.0 528Coast 2.5 53.3 44.2 0.0 100.0 145 10.4 51.5 37.5 0.6 100.0 403Eastern 2.3 63.8 32.8 1.0 100.0 162 5.3 54.7 40.0 0.0 100.0 813Nyanza 2.2 48.5 48.6 0.7 100.0 169 7.1 47.0 45.4 0.5 100.0 822Rift Valley 1.4 53.6 44.2 0.9 100.0 415 7.9 56.6 35.0 0.5 100.0 1,217Western 1.8 58.8 39.4 0.0 100.0 100 4.7 48.7 46.4 0.1 100.0 505North Eastern 3.0 56.5 40.5 0.0 100.0 21 11.1 13.8 74.9 0.2 100.0 109EducationNo education 0.8 43.7 55.5 0.0 100.0 60 10.9 30.2 58.1 0.8 100.0 503Primary incomplete 3.6 58.2 37.5 0.7 100.0 262 7.0 47.7 45.0 0.3 100.0 1,399Primary complete 3.6 51.5 45.0 0.0 100.0 346 7.3 55.1 37.2 0.4 100.0 1,407Secondary+ 1.7 51.7 45.8 0.7 100.0 645 4.9 65.5 29.5 0.1 100.0 1,441Wealth quintileLowest 1.2 51.0 46.9 0.8 100.0 155 8.6 38.6 52.4 0.5 100.0 796Second 2.0 56.3 40.8 0.9 100.0 172 6.8 52.0 40.9 0.3 100.0 859Middle 4.5 63.7 31.8 0.0 100.0 161 6.3 53.3 40.0 0.4 100.0 922Fourth 3.5 59.0 36.3 1.2 100.0 260 5.3 61.0 33.3 0.4 100.0 990Highest 2.1 45.8 52.0 0.1 100.0 565 7.5 58.3 34.2 0.0 100.0 1,184Total 15-49 2.5 52.6 44.4 0.5 100.0 1,313 6.9 53.4 39.4 0.3 100.0 4,750M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 0.8 69.8 29.4 0.0 100.0 135 na na na na na 0Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 2.4 54.2 43.0 0.5 100.0 1,449 na na na na na 0Note: an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that have be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicableTable 15.3 shows, for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> who earned cash in the past 12 months, theperson who decides how their cash earnings are used, and for all curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> whosehusbands earned cash in the past 12 months, the person who decides how their husband’s cashearnings are used, according to the r<strong>el</strong>ative magnitude of the earnings of wom<strong>en</strong> and their husband orpartner. As expected, wom<strong>en</strong> whose earnings exceed their husband’s, or whose husband has no cashearnings, are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have control over their own earnings. On the other hand, wom<strong>en</strong> whoreceive the same amount of pay as their husbands are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to say that decisions on the232 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


use of their earnings are mainly made jointly with their husbands. Joint decisions are also made on thehusband’s income.With regard to the husband’s cash earnings, more than half of the wom<strong>en</strong> say that they makejoint decisions on how to use the husband’s cash earnings, regardless of the r<strong>el</strong>ative income of thewife or whether the wife receives any cash earnings.Table 15.3 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s control over her own earnings and over those of her husbandPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with cash earnings in the last 12 months by person who decides how the woman’s cashearnings are used and perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 whose husbands have cash earnings by person who decides how thehusband’s cash earnings are used, according to the r<strong>el</strong>ation betwe<strong>en</strong> woman’s and husband’s cash earnings, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Wom<strong>en</strong>’s earnings r<strong>el</strong>ativeto husband’s earningsPerson who decides how the wife’scash earnings are used:MainlywifeWife andhusbandjointlyMainlyhusbandOtherTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>Person who decides how the husband’scash earnings are used:MainlywifeWife andhusbandjointlyMainlyhusbandMore than husband/partner 51.0 40.3 8.7 0.0 100.0 306 14.9 51.4 33.5 0.2 100.0 301Less than husband/partner 45.9 45.7 8.3 0.1 100.0 1,547 6.3 55.0 38.7 0.1 100.0 1,546Same as husband partner 16.2 71.9 11.8 0.0 100.0 396 3.9 73.6 22.5 0.0 100.0 396Husband/ partner has nocash earnings/did not work 61.2 33.9 4.9 0.0 100.0 82 na na na na na 0Woman has no cashearnings na na na na na 0 8.0 57.6 33.6 0.8 100.0 881Woman did not work in last12 months na na na na na 0 5.8 45.3 48.7 0.2 100.0 1,580Total 1 42.3 48.8 8.8 0.2 100.0 2,378 6.9 53.4 39.4 0.3 100.0 4,750OtherTotalNumberofwom<strong>en</strong>na = Not applicable1Excludes cases where a woman or her husband/partner has no earnings and includes cases where a woman does not know whether she earned more orless than her husband/partner15.3 WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKINGIn addition to educational attainm<strong>en</strong>t, employm<strong>en</strong>t status, and control over earnings, theKDHS collected information on some direct measures of wom<strong>en</strong>’s autonomy and status. Specifically,questions were asked about wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in household decision-making. To assess wom<strong>en</strong>’sdecision-making autonomy, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> were asked who usually makes decisions aboutfive specific issues: her own health care; major household purchases; purchases for daily householdneeds; visits to her family or r<strong>el</strong>atives; and what food to cook each day. Table 15.4 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tdistribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by who usually make these five decisions.Table 15.4.1 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-makingPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> by person who usually makes decisions about five kinds of issues,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09DecisionMainlywifeWife andhusbandjointlyMainlyhusbandSomeone<strong>el</strong>seOther/missingTotalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Own health care 27.9 45.4 26.4 0.2 0.1 100.0 4,928Major household purchases 13.9 52.9 32.8 0.2 0.2 100.0 4,928Purchases of daily household needs 50.4 31.7 17.5 0.2 0.1 100.0 4,928Visits to her family or r<strong>el</strong>atives 21.7 51.4 26.3 0.4 0.2 100.0 4,928What food to cook each day 83.1 10.6 4.9 1.0 0.5 100.0 4,928In g<strong>en</strong>eral, wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be the main decision maker for purchases of dailyhousehold needs and what food to cook each day, while decisions about her health care, majorhousehold purchases, and visits to her family or r<strong>el</strong>atives are more oft<strong>en</strong> decided jointly.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 233


Figure 15.1 shows the distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> according to the number ofdecisions in which they participate. Half of married wom<strong>en</strong> say that they participate in all of thespecified household decisions. On the other extreme, only 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> say that they have nosay in household decision-making.Figure 15.1 Number of Decisions in Which Wom<strong>en</strong> Participate60Perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>505040302010019139630 1 2 3 4 5Number of decisionsK<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Table 15.4.2 gives the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by the personwho they think should have a greater say in making decisions about five kinds of issues: purchasingmajor household items, purchasing daily household needs, visiting the wife’s family or r<strong>el</strong>atives, whatto do with the wife’s income, and how many childr<strong>en</strong> the couple will have. More than half of m<strong>en</strong> (53perc<strong>en</strong>t) think that decisions pertaining to purchases of daily household needs should be made bywives, while more than half of m<strong>en</strong> fe<strong>el</strong> that decisions regarding major household purchases, visits tothe wife’s family or r<strong>el</strong>atives, and how to use the wife’s income should be made jointly with theirwives. M<strong>en</strong> fe<strong>el</strong> strongly that decisions on how many childr<strong>en</strong> to have should be made together withtheir wives (77 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 15.4.2 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making according to m<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> 15-49 by person who they think should have a greater say inmaking decisions about five kinds of issues, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09DecisionWifeWife andhusbandequallyHusbandDon’tknow/dep<strong>en</strong>dsTotalNumberof m<strong>en</strong>Major household purchases 8.9 52.9 37.9 0.3 100.0 1,592Purchases of daily household needs 52.8 32.4 13.7 1.0 100.0 1,592Visits to wife’s family or r<strong>el</strong>atives 7.3 58.5 33.5 0.7 100.0 1,592What to do with the money wife earns 26.7 53.3 17.7 2.3 100.0 1,592How many childr<strong>en</strong> to have 2.3 76.7 19.3 1.7 100.0 1,592Table 15.5.1 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 that usually makespecific decisions, either by thems<strong>el</strong>ves or jointly with their husbands, by background characteristics.In g<strong>en</strong>eral, wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making increases with age, education, and wealthquintile. Those residing in urban areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be involved in decision-making than theirrural counterparts. Also, wom<strong>en</strong> who are employed for cash are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be involved indecision-making than are those who work but who do not earn cash or those who are not employed.234 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


Wom<strong>en</strong> in C<strong>en</strong>tral province and Nairobi province are g<strong>en</strong>erally more involved in decisionmakingthan wom<strong>en</strong> in other provinces. On the other hand, wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province are leastlik<strong>el</strong>y to have a say in household decisions.Table 15.5.1 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in decision-making by background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who usually make specific decisions either by thems<strong>el</strong>ves or jointly with theirhusband, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicOwnhealth careMakingmajorhouseholdpurchasesMakingpurchasesfor dailyhouseholdneedsVisits to herfamily orr<strong>el</strong>ativesDecidingwhat foodto cookeach dayPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewhoparticipatein all fivedecisionsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewhoparticipatein none ofthe fivedecisionsNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 56.7 50.5 68.2 60.7 84.0 35.1 7.2 21220-24 69.5 61.5 78.0 66.9 88.8 44.3 4.6 95825-29 70.6 64.8 81.6 70.2 94.9 46.6 2.5 1,08830-34 77.5 68.9 83.9 75.7 95.1 52.5 0.9 96235-39 74.7 70.0 85.6 78.9 96.6 55.1 1.6 69440-44 80.0 72.8 86.7 78.4 95.9 56.3 1.8 54845-49 76.3 72.9 83.8 78.0 95.3 56.1 1.7 466Employm<strong>en</strong>t in last12 monthsNot employed 61.2 54.7 70.4 66.5 92.0 39.6 4.1 1,647Employed for cash 82.2 74.9 89.1 78.5 94.9 59.6 1.6 2,378Employed not for cash 72.0 67.1 85.3 70.9 94.0 43.7 2.0 899Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 72.2 69.8 79.3 72.1 90.8 52.3 3.2 2961-2 71.7 65.7 82.8 72.1 92.8 50.1 3.3 1,7633-4 75.8 69.4 82.3 74.5 93.9 52.5 2.2 1,5635+ 72.7 64.3 81.7 73.0 95.3 46.2 1.7 1,307Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 76.3 70.7 86.2 76.8 94.2 57.0 2.5 1,154Rural 72.4 65.5 80.8 72.0 93.5 47.8 2.5 3,774ProvinceNairobi 77.7 74.1 86.7 82.2 95.0 60.6 2.5 363C<strong>en</strong>tral 87.6 83.1 91.7 87.1 97.3 69.1 0.6 535Coast 66.9 60.5 74.4 55.3 86.5 37.6 6.2 427Eastern 67.5 69.7 89.3 74.8 94.8 47.7 0.8 844Nyanza 74.7 67.7 84.7 79.6 89.8 54.2 4.2 832Rift Valley 75.1 65.7 77.1 66.7 96.8 47.8 0.9 1,279Western 72.8 55.1 81.0 70.6 91.2 41.8 5.7 518North Eastern 36.4 30.9 46.1 69.1 95.6 23.5 1.7 130EducationNo education 56.7 49.2 65.1 56.6 91.2 30.9 4.1 565Primary incomplete 70.1 61.0 79.8 68.8 91.9 42.3 3.0 1,440Primary complete 76.0 68.9 83.3 75.7 94.0 53.6 2.5 1,436Secondary+ 80.1 76.8 89.6 81.0 96.1 61.1 1.5 1,488Wealth quintileLowest 63.3 51.7 69.7 60.9 92.4 35.5 3.1 870Second 70.2 64.2 82.4 72.6 92.0 46.8 3.7 883Middle 75.1 69.3 82.8 73.6 93.3 50.3 2.1 952Fourth 75.5 71.9 86.6 76.6 94.7 53.4 1.7 1,012Highest 79.5 73.2 86.5 78.9 95.2 59.5 2.1 1,211Total 73.3 66.8 82.1 73.1 93.7 50.0 2.5 4,928Note: Total includes 5 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t.Details of m<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes towards wives’ participation in decision-making are shown in Table15.5.2. The table shows that four in t<strong>en</strong> m<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve that wom<strong>en</strong> should have the greatest say, eitheralone or jointly with her husband, in all five decisions. M<strong>en</strong> fe<strong>el</strong> strongly about a wife’s role indecisions involving making purchases for daily household needs, what to do with the money the wifeearns, and how many childr<strong>en</strong> to have, and they fe<strong>el</strong> less strongly about involving her in makingmajor household purchases and visits to her family or r<strong>el</strong>atives. Very few m<strong>en</strong> (4 perc<strong>en</strong>t) think thatwom<strong>en</strong> should not participate in any of the decisions.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 235


Older m<strong>en</strong>, urban m<strong>en</strong>, and those m<strong>en</strong> with more education and with greater wealth are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than other married m<strong>en</strong> to think a wife should participate in all five decisions. Married m<strong>en</strong> inC<strong>en</strong>tral province are the most lik<strong>el</strong>y to approve of wom<strong>en</strong>’s decision-making participation, while m<strong>en</strong>in North Eastern province are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y to approve.Table 15.5.2 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitude toward wives’ participation in decision-makingPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who think a wife should have the greater say alone or equal say with her husbandon five specific kinds of decisions, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicMakingmajorhouseholdpurchasesMakingpurchasesfor dailyhouseholdneedsVisits to herfamily orr<strong>el</strong>ativesWhat to dowith themoney thewife earnsHow manychildr<strong>en</strong> tohaveAll fivedecisionsNone ofthe fivedecisionsNumber ofm<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 * * * * * * * 320-24 54.9 75.8 53.4 62.2 62.3 29.3 6.3 10025-29 59.9 87.8 63.4 78.0 79.1 39.7 3.4 29630-34 53.5 84.1 64.3 79.7 77.1 36.9 5.8 38435-39 70.6 87.3 68.2 78.1 80.7 40.0 1.7 29440-44 65.1 84.1 68.4 86.0 79.9 47.1 4.0 27945-49 65.8 87.3 71.0 86.1 85.6 43.8 2.0 236Employm<strong>en</strong>t in last12 monthsNot employed * * * * * * * 15Employed for cash 59.8 85.4 65.5 80.4 78.8 39.8 4.3 1,313Employed but not for cash 70.6 84.6 66.1 77.4 78.9 41.0 1.5 264Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 71.4 80.6 63.3 80.9 73.0 41.9 3.4 1221-2 64.7 87.7 65.9 81.2 83.3 43.5 4.0 5613-4 61.1 86.1 70.9 79.5 80.5 41.4 3.1 5375+ 55.1 82.0 59.2 78.5 72.1 33.2 4.3 372Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 65.0 90.8 69.8 84.6 80.1 43.5 3.3 523Rural 60.2 82.5 63.9 77.8 78.4 38.7 4.0 1,070ProvinceNairobi 66.2 92.4 83.2 93.6 82.5 47.6 0.1 164C<strong>en</strong>tral 83.0 92.1 75.0 90.4 88.3 61.4 0.9 151Coast 56.6 85.7 52.9 82.1 81.7 29.7 1.1 155Eastern 68.0 88.8 57.7 78.0 78.1 42.0 1.3 213Nyanza 54.3 90.6 63.9 77.1 81.8 35.4 0.7 247Rift Valley 61.0 76.9 63.6 72.8 75.1 39.3 9.9 486Western 58.5 81.0 67.4 84.3 75.0 38.7 2.6 141North Eastern 9.8 93.9 89.0 77.3 63.8 4.5 0.0 35EducationNo education 36.0 74.0 53.5 72.9 48.6 20.5 14.8 77Primary incomplete 55.8 80.1 55.4 75.4 70.2 34.1 5.1 335Primary complete 60.5 84.8 64.0 75.8 79.6 37.6 3.0 440Secondary+ 67.9 89.0 72.9 85.3 85.6 46.7 2.4 742Wealth quintileLowest 45.0 70.2 55.1 66.1 64.0 21.1 9.1 229Second 58.4 83.3 63.4 79.0 79.7 41.3 4.2 256Middle 64.4 83.6 61.6 82.3 80.0 37.6 3.2 236Fourth 66.7 88.5 73.0 87.5 85.6 52.0 1.3 288Highest 66.4 91.1 69.2 81.3 80.9 42.6 2.8 584Total 15-49 61.8 85.3 65.8 80.0 79.0 40.3 3.7 1,592M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 57.0 81.3 65.2 82.9 73.0 39.1 3.3 187Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 61.3 84.9 65.7 80.3 78.3 40.1 3.7 1,780Note: an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that have be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.15.4 ATTITUDES TOWARDS WIFE BEATINGViol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong> has serious consequ<strong>en</strong>ces for their m<strong>en</strong>tal and physical w<strong>el</strong>l-being,including their reproductive and sexual health (WHO, 1999). One of the most common forms ofviol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong> worldwide is abuse by a husband or partner (Heise et al., 1999).236 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


The 2008-09 KDHS gathered information on wom<strong>en</strong>’s and m<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward wifebeating. Wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> were asked whether a husband is justified in beating his wife under a seriesof circumstances: if the wife burns the food, argues with him, goes out without t<strong>el</strong>ling him, neglectsthe childr<strong>en</strong>, or refuses sexual r<strong>el</strong>ations. Wom<strong>en</strong> who b<strong>el</strong>ieve that a husband is justified in hitting orbeating his wife for any of the specified reasons may b<strong>el</strong>ieve thems<strong>el</strong>ves to be low in status, bothabsolut<strong>el</strong>y and r<strong>el</strong>ative to m<strong>en</strong>. Such a perception could act as a barrier to accessing health care forthem and their childr<strong>en</strong>, affect their attitudes toward contraceptive use, and influ<strong>en</strong>ce their g<strong>en</strong>eralw<strong>el</strong>l-being. Table 15.6.1 summarizes wom<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward wife beating in these five specificcircumstances. The table also shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who agree that wife beating is justifiedin at least one of the circumstances.Table 15.6.1 Attitude toward wife beating: Wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who agree that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife for specific reasons, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicBurns thefoodHusband is justified in hitting or beating his wife if she:Argues withhimGoes outwithoutt<strong>el</strong>ling himNeglects thechildr<strong>en</strong>Refuses tohave sexualintercoursewith himPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agreewith at leastone specifiedreasonNumberAge15-19 15.1 31.2 30.6 44.7 17.8 56.6 1,76120-24 13.3 32.2 31.9 39.3 21.1 52.1 1,71525-29 11.9 27.5 27.7 39.6 22.3 49.2 1,45430-34 12.6 29.3 30.8 41.0 24.2 51.4 1,20935-39 13.9 29.4 29.9 40.5 25.4 50.7 87740-44 11.0 31.1 28.4 42.8 25.7 51.2 76845-49 15.7 38.5 37.8 46.4 30.6 57.0 661Employm<strong>en</strong>t in last12 monthsNot employed 13.6 31.2 32.6 42.2 21.5 53.5 3,462Employed for cash 11.5 27.9 26.8 37.3 21.4 47.4 3,744Employed but not forcash 18.4 38.8 37.4 54.0 30.0 66.3 1,232Marital statusNever married 12.4 26.2 26.6 38.6 16.5 49.4 2,634Married or livingtogether 13.6 32.9 32.5 42.4 24.8 53.9 4,928Divorced/separated/widowed 15.0 33.1 32.5 46.9 28.9 55.3 881Number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>0 12.6 25.1 26.3 37.8 15.4 48.5 2,3971-2 11.2 29.4 27.9 37.6 20.6 48.9 2,5793-4 13.8 31.5 31.4 44.3 26.4 53.2 1,8995+ 17.7 41.3 41.2 51.3 32.5 64.3 1,569Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 6.4 17.2 18.0 27.6 11.9 34.1 2,148Rural 15.8 35.5 35.0 46.5 26.3 58.9 6,296ProvinceNairobi 2.7 8.8 11.7 20.2 7.7 24.6 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 6.1 18.4 16.0 29.8 19.2 36.8 905Coast 13.6 29.6 30.0 36.1 20.6 49.0 674Eastern 6.2 16.7 24.6 40.8 15.5 46.6 1,376Nyanza 13.7 42.2 31.6 43.6 22.9 56.3 1,389Rift Valley 20.4 38.3 41.2 50.5 28.9 64.9 2,262Western 22.9 48.2 41.6 52.4 32.9 67.8 927North Eastern 7.7 25.0 34.7 35.5 30.4 44.3 184EducationNo education 23.2 43.1 47.6 52.7 35.5 68.3 752Primary incomplete 18.3 40.5 39.4 50.5 31.0 63.6 2,526Primary complete 12.1 29.5 30.2 41.4 21.3 53.6 2,272Secondary+ 7.5 20.3 19.0 31.4 13.1 38.2 2,894Wealth quintileLowest 22.2 41.9 44.0 52.5 33.6 67.2 1,393Second 19.6 44.6 43.6 54.4 31.1 67.1 1,483Middle 14.4 35.0 31.2 47.9 25.8 58.6 1,613Fourth 10.3 25.8 26.7 37.1 19.1 48.9 1,736Highest 5.4 15.7 16.4 25.6 10.7 32.3 2,220Total 13.4 30.9 30.7 41.7 22.7 52.6 8,444Note: Total includes 6 wom<strong>en</strong> for whom employm<strong>en</strong>t status is missing.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 237


Overall, acceptance of wife beating ranges from 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> (if the wife burns thefood) to 42 perc<strong>en</strong>t (if she neglects the childr<strong>en</strong>). More than half of wom<strong>en</strong> (53 perc<strong>en</strong>t) agree with atleast one of the specified reasons for a husband’s beating his wife.Younger wom<strong>en</strong> and older wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than wom<strong>en</strong> age 25-44 to accept wifebeating.Wom<strong>en</strong> who are employed for cash and those who have never married are the least lik<strong>el</strong>y toaccept wife beating as justified for any reason. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who find wife beating to bejustified increases with the number of living childr<strong>en</strong>. Rural wom<strong>en</strong> are almost twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y asurban wom<strong>en</strong> to go along with wife beating for some reason (59 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 34 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y).The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who agree with at least one of the giv<strong>en</strong> reasons for beating a wife varies byprovince, from 25 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi to 68 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in Western province. Th<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>ihood that a woman perceives wife beating to be justified decreases markedly as the woman’slev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth quintile increase. For example, 67 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in the poorestquintile agree with wife beating for at least one reason compared with 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in therichest quintile.M<strong>en</strong> were also asked whether wife beating is justified under certain circumstances. Table15.6.2 shows m<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes towards wife beatings. Compared with wom<strong>en</strong> of the same age, m<strong>en</strong> age15-49 are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to support wife beating for each of the five specified reasons. For instance, only 8perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> agree that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife if she burns the food,compared with 13 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>. Similarly, only 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> compared with 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> say that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife if she argues with him. Overall,less than half of m<strong>en</strong> (44 perc<strong>en</strong>t) agree with at least one specified reason for a husband to beat hiswife compared with 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>.The lik<strong>el</strong>ihood that m<strong>en</strong> agree that wife beating is justified in at least one of the specifiedsituations g<strong>en</strong>erally decreases with age. M<strong>en</strong> who are divorced, separated, or widowed are more lik<strong>el</strong>yto agree with wife beating, while m<strong>en</strong> who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married or living together are the least lik<strong>el</strong>yto agree that wife beating is justified. M<strong>en</strong> in rural areas are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than those in urban areas toagree with at least one of the reasons giv<strong>en</strong> for justifying wife beating (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t compared with 36perc<strong>en</strong>t). The perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> in each province who agree with at least one of these reasons isinconsist<strong>en</strong>t with that of wom<strong>en</strong> and does not vary as wid<strong>el</strong>y from province to province. It rangesfrom 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t in Nairobi to 47 perc<strong>en</strong>t in Eastern, Nyanza, and Western provinces. M<strong>en</strong>’s educationand wealth quintile are negativ<strong>el</strong>y associated with their agreem<strong>en</strong>t with any reason for a husband tohit his wife.Table 15.6.2 Attitude toward wife beating: M<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who agree that a husband is justified in hitting or beating his wife for specific reasons, bybackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicBurns thefoodHusband is justified in hitting or beating his wife if she:Argues withhimGoes outwithoutt<strong>el</strong>ling himNeglects thechildr<strong>en</strong>Refuses tohave sexualintercoursewith himPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agreewith at leastone specifiedreasonNumberAge15-19 10.2 31.5 29.8 36.8 15.6 54.1 77620-24 7.6 22.5 20.8 31.5 15.4 42.7 63025-29 6.2 20.8 22.0 26.4 10.1 39.8 48330-34 8.8 22.7 24.3 30.2 12.9 43.0 46135-39 5.5 19.7 22.1 25.4 12.5 37.2 34440-44 5.9 18.3 24.3 30.6 15.0 42.2 30645-49 5.4 20.7 22.9 30.3 13.0 37.4 257Employm<strong>en</strong>t in last12 monthsNot employed 9.9 25.2 27.4 34.1 15.9 47.5 373Employed for cash 7.2 22.2 22.8 31.0 13.4 42.5 2,016Employed not for cash 7.6 26.2 26.3 29.8 13.7 46.2 867Marital statusNever married 9.1 26.6 25.2 32.3 14.9 47.3 1,524Married or living together 6.3 20.3 22.8 28.6 11.8 39.7 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 6.8 28.4 31.0 44.1 23.2 56.5 142Continued…238 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


Table 15.6.2—ContinuedBackgroundcharacteristicBurns thefoodHusband is justified in hitting or beating his wife if she:Argues withhimGoes outwithoutt<strong>el</strong>ling himNeglects thechildr<strong>en</strong>Refuses tohave sexualintercoursewith himPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agreewith at leastone specifiedreasonNumberNumber of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 9.3 25.6 25.3 32.0 15.0 46.5 1,6261-2 4.5 20.2 17.3 27.3 10.9 38.2 6913-4 6.0 20.3 24.0 28.8 11.3 41.7 5595+ 8.5 25.9 33.0 36.4 17.4 47.3 381Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 6.0 15.8 16.5 27.6 8.4 36.1 866Rural 8.2 26.4 27.1 32.2 15.7 46.9 2,392ProvinceNairobi 5.5 10.4 11.2 25.0 7.2 30.9 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 8.3 23.2 17.8 30.7 25.9 44.7 347Coast 5.4 22.5 24.6 28.1 9.7 45.8 252Eastern 5.4 25.7 28.1 33.2 15.0 47.3 530Nyanza 7.9 28.7 23.8 28.0 10.4 46.7 520Rift Valley 9.1 23.5 29.5 34.8 14.3 43.5 885Western 11.0 28.6 23.2 30.6 9.9 46.9 349North Eastern 0.6 7.4 27.9 29.7 29.6 39.9 62EducationNo education 20.0 41.7 53.2 60.4 44.3 70.9 112Primary incomplete 10.4 34.6 33.7 39.6 20.2 58.3 883Primary complete 6.2 24.6 24.0 33.7 12.5 46.1 804Secondary+ 5.8 14.9 16.4 22.0 8.3 32.1 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 10.0 27.2 35.7 37.5 18.4 53.5 457Second 8.6 31.6 29.9 35.1 15.2 52.0 577Middle 6.1 25.3 24.5 30.4 17.8 44.8 574Fourth 8.5 22.7 24.0 29.3 11.8 41.0 725Highest 6.1 16.4 15.2 26.9 9.7 36.2 926Total 15-49 7.6 23.6 24.3 31.0 13.8 44.0 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 2.6 21.1 27.7 29.6 9.5 38.8 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 7.3 23.4 24.5 30.9 13.5 43.7 3,465Note: Total includes 3 m<strong>en</strong> whose employm<strong>en</strong>t status is missing.15.5 MEN’S ATTITUDES TOWARDS WIFE’S REFUSING SEXTo assess attitudes towards marital sexual expectations, m<strong>en</strong> who were interviewed in the2008-09 KDHS were asked the following question:Do you think that if a woman refuses to have sex with her husband wh<strong>en</strong> he wants her to, hehas the right to• Get angry and reprimand her?• Refuse to give her money or other means of support?• Use force and have sex with her ev<strong>en</strong> if she doesn’t want to?• Have sex with another woman?Table 15.7 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age who answered affirmativ<strong>el</strong>y to each of thesebehaviours by background characteristics. Two in three m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 (66 perc<strong>en</strong>t) do not agree thata husband has the right to take any of the four specified behaviours, while 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t think a husband isjustified in taking all of the specified actions. As for specific behaviours, 27 perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> fe<strong>el</strong> that ahusband has a right to get angry and reprimand his wife if she refuses to have sex with him. However,only nine perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> think that a husband has a right to either refuse financial support or have sexwith another woman if his wife refuses to have sex with him. Five perc<strong>en</strong>t of m<strong>en</strong> say that a husbandis justified in forcing his wife to have sex.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 239


Table 15.7 M<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes toward a husband’s rights wh<strong>en</strong> his wife refuses to have sexual intercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who consider that a husband has the right to certain behaviours wh<strong>en</strong> a woman refusesto have sex with him wh<strong>en</strong> he wants her to, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicWh<strong>en</strong> a woman refuses to have sex with herhusband, he has the right to:Get angryandreprimandherRefuse herfinancialsupportUse forceto have sexHave sexwithanotherwomanPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agreewith all of thespecifiedreasonsPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho agreewith none ofthe specifiedreasonsNumberAge15-19 31.6 12.1 5.1 8.9 0.9 60.2 77620-24 30.0 7.8 5.9 10.1 1.1 63.9 63025-29 20.4 6.6 1.7 9.9 0.4 72.0 48330-34 23.7 9.4 6.0 8.9 2.0 69.9 46135-39 25.4 7.3 4.3 9.2 0.6 68.6 34440-44 24.0 7.2 4.2 7.5 1.4 71.9 30645-49 29.6 13.1 4.8 9.7 0.9 65.4 257Employm<strong>en</strong>t in last12 monthsNot employed 28.7 6.1 4.6 9.4 0.7 62.6 373Employed for cash 26.6 8.6 5.3 9.8 1.2 67.4 2,016Employed not for cash 27.1 11.8 3.2 7.9 0.7 65.8 867Marital statusNever married 28.7 9.2 5.1 9.7 0.9 63.6 1,524Married or livingtogether 24.9 8.2 3.9 8.4 1.0 70.0 1,592Divorced/separated/widowed 32.1 19.6 8.1 14.6 2.7 57.1 142Number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>0 28.4 9.7 5.2 9.4 0.9 63.9 1,6261-2 18.1 6.0 3.3 6.3 0.9 77.2 6913-4 31.1 9.5 3.9 10.6 0.7 63.2 5595+ 30.9 12.3 6.2 11.9 2.1 62.4 381Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 20.0 5.0 3.3 7.4 0.6 73.6 866Rural 29.5 10.7 5.2 9.9 1.2 63.9 2,392ProvinceNairobi 13.7 3.1 3.5 12.3 0.6 75.7 314C<strong>en</strong>tral 24.8 11.4 7.4 8.6 1.3 65.2 347Coast 21.2 5.5 3.1 5.8 0.5 74.0 252Eastern 25.4 13.7 2.8 8.5 0.6 67.4 530Nyanza 42.1 12.8 3.9 10.3 0.8 51.7 520Rift Valley 27.4 7.0 6.8 9.6 1.5 68.3 885Western 25.1 8.6 2.9 10.0 1.3 68.7 349North Eastern 21.3 7.4 3.8 0.0 0.0 72.9 62EducationNo education 48.1 24.5 20.8 27.1 9.6 39.8 112Primary incomplete 30.4 12.5 7.3 11.4 2.1 61.4 883Primary complete 29.8 10.0 3.9 10.3 0.3 63.5 804Secondary+ 21.8 5.5 2.2 6.0 0.1 73.2 1,459Wealth quintileLowest 37.2 11.1 8.6 13.6 2.6 56.4 457Second 29.9 13.0 5.0 9.6 1.3 64.2 577Middle 30.7 10.7 4.2 10.4 0.9 61.9 574Fourth 23.2 8.1 4.7 6.4 0.5 70.6 725Highest 20.8 5.7 2.8 8.5 0.6 72.3 926Total 15-49 27.0 9.2 4.7 9.3 1.0 66.4 3,258M<strong>en</strong> age 50-54 18.3 5.2 3.8 9.2 0.4 74.6 207Total m<strong>en</strong> 15-54 26.5 8.9 4.6 9.3 1.0 66.9 3,465Note: Total includes 3 m<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t status.The lik<strong>el</strong>ihood that a man agrees that a husband has the right to certain behaviours wh<strong>en</strong> hiswife refuses to have sex with him does not vary wid<strong>el</strong>y across the man’s background characteristics.However, data in Table 15.7 show that the proportion of m<strong>en</strong> who do not agree that any of thespecified behaviours is justified increases with increasing lev<strong>el</strong> of education and wealth quintile.240 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


15.6 WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT INDICATORSThe two sets of empowerm<strong>en</strong>t indicators, nam<strong>el</strong>y wom<strong>en</strong>’s participation in making householddecisions and wom<strong>en</strong>’s attitude toward wife beating can be summarized by two separate indices. Thefirst index shows the number of decisions (see Table 15.5.1 for the list of decisions) in which wom<strong>en</strong>participate alone or jointly with their husband or partner. This index ranges in value from 0 to 5 andr<strong>el</strong>ates positiv<strong>el</strong>y to wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. It reflects the degree of control that wom<strong>en</strong> are able toexercise in areas that affect their own lives and <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>ts. The second index, which also ranges invalue from 0 to 5, is the total number of reasons (see Table 15.6.1 for the list of reasons) for which therespond<strong>en</strong>t fe<strong>el</strong>s that a husband is justified in beating his wife. A lower score on this indicator isinterpreted as reflecting a greater s<strong>en</strong>se of <strong>en</strong>titlem<strong>en</strong>t and s<strong>el</strong>f-esteem and a higher status of wom<strong>en</strong>.Table 15.8 shows how these two indicators r<strong>el</strong>ate to each other. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, it is expected thatwom<strong>en</strong> who participate in making household decisions are also more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have g<strong>en</strong>der-egalitarianb<strong>el</strong>iefs. The data confirm this pattern. The perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who disagree with all reasons forwife beating is highest among wom<strong>en</strong> who participate in all five of the specified household decisions.Similarly, the proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> who participate in making all of the household decisionsdeclines as the number of reasons for which they fe<strong>el</strong> wife beating is justified increases.Table 15.8 Indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>tPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who participate in all decisionmakingand perc<strong>en</strong>tage who disagree with all reasons for justifying wife-beating, byvalue on each of the indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Empowerm<strong>en</strong>tindicatorPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whoparticipate inmaking alldecisionsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whodisagree with allthe reasonsjustifying wifebeatingNumber ofcurr<strong>en</strong>tlymarriedwom<strong>en</strong>Number of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate 10 na 42.7 1241-2 na 39.0 7713-4 na 36.7 1,5715 na 54.5 2,463Number of reasons for whichwife-beating is justified 20 59.1 na 2,2741-2 45.7 na 1,2733-4 38.7 na 1,0235 39.5 na 358na=not applicable1See Table 15.5.1 for the list of decisions2See Table 15.6.1 for the list of reasons15.7 CURRENT USE OF CONTRACEPTION BY WOMEN’S STATUSA woman’s ability to control her fertility and the contraceptive method she chooses are lik<strong>el</strong>yto be affected by her status, s<strong>el</strong>f-image, and s<strong>en</strong>se of empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. A woman who fe<strong>el</strong>s that she isunable to control other aspects of her life may be less lik<strong>el</strong>y to fe<strong>el</strong> she can make decisions regardingfertility. She may also fe<strong>el</strong> the need to choose methods that are easier to conceal from her husband orpartner or that do not dep<strong>en</strong>d on his cooperation.Table 15.9 shows the r<strong>el</strong>ationship of each of the two indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t—number of decisions in which the woman participates and number of reasons that wife-beating isjustified—with curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraceptive methods by curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49. The dataindicate that there is a positive association betwe<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong>’s status and contraceptive use. Forexample, the proportion of married wom<strong>en</strong> who are using any method of contraception rises steadily,from only 28 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who do not participate in any household decision-making to 50perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who participate in all five decisions. The data further show that use of aWom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 241


contraceptive method decreases with the increase in the number of reasons a woman thinks wifebeating is justified. More than half (52 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> who do not fe<strong>el</strong> that wife beating isjustified for any reason are using a contraceptive method compared with 41 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> whob<strong>el</strong>ieve that wife beating is justified for all five reasons.Table 15.9 Curr<strong>en</strong>t use of contraception by wom<strong>en</strong>’s statusPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by curr<strong>en</strong>t contraceptive method, according to s<strong>el</strong>ected indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’sstatus, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Modern methodsEmpowerm<strong>en</strong>tindicatorAnymethodAnymodernmethodFemalesterilizationTemporarymodernfemalemethods 1MalecondomAnytraditionalmethodNotcurr<strong>en</strong>tlyusingTotalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Number of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate 20 28.2 26.6 1.6 22.6 2.4 1.6 71.8 100.0 1241-2 32.9 24.9 2.8 21.4 0.8 8.0 67.1 100.0 7713-4 45.4 39.2 4.9 32.3 2.0 6.1 54.6 100.0 1,5715 50.3 44.8 5.5 37.3 2.0 5.6 49.7 100.0 2,463Number of reasons for whichwife-beating is justified 30 51.6 45.8 4.2 39.7 1.8 5.8 48.4 100.0 2,2741-2 41.8 35.2 4.6 28.2 2.4 6.6 58.2 100.0 1,2733-4 37.9 31.5 5.3 25.5 0.8 6.3 62.1 100.0 1,0235 41.3 36.8 7.6 26.8 2.5 4.5 58.7 100.0 358Total 45.5 39.4 4.8 32.8 1.8 6.0 54.5 100.0 4,928Note: If more than one method is used, only the most effective method is considered in this tabulation.1Pill, IUD, injectables, implants, female condom, diaphragm, foam/j<strong>el</strong>ly, and lactational am<strong>en</strong>orrhea method2See Table 15.5.1 for the list of decisions3See Table 15.6.1 for the list of reasons15.8 IDEAL FAMILY SIZE AND UNMET NEED BY WOMEN’S STATUSAs a woman becomes more empowered, she is more lik<strong>el</strong>y to want fewer childr<strong>en</strong> and to havethe ability to create her ideal family size through the use of contraception. Table 15.10 shows howwom<strong>en</strong>’s ideal family size and wom<strong>en</strong>’s unmet need for family planning vary by the two indicators ofwom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. The data show that there is some positive association betwe<strong>en</strong> a woman’sstatus and her mean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong>. For instance, wom<strong>en</strong> who participate in all of the fivetypes of decision-making want to have 3.8 childr<strong>en</strong> on average, compared with 4.2 childr<strong>en</strong> reportedby wom<strong>en</strong> who do not participate in any decision. The sc<strong>en</strong>ario is reversed with respect to the numberof reasons for which wife-beating is justified. Wom<strong>en</strong> who agree with all five reasons for wife beatinghave the highest mean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> (4.4), while wom<strong>en</strong> who do not justify wife beatingfor any reason have the lowest mean ideal family size (3.4).The data further show that wom<strong>en</strong>’s status is negativ<strong>el</strong>y associated with unmet need forfamily planning services. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> with an unmet needfor family planning decreases with each increase in the number of decisions in which wom<strong>en</strong>participate and increases with the increase in the number of reasons for which wife beating is justified.242 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


Table 15.10 Wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> and unmet need for family planningMean ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> for wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with an unmet need for family planning, by indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Empowerm<strong>en</strong>tindicatorMean idealnumber ofchildr<strong>en</strong> 1Number ofwom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedwom<strong>en</strong> with an unmet need forfamily planning 2For spacing For limiting TotalNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Number of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate 30 4.2 114 15.6 7.5 23.1 1241-2 4.7 701 15.1 13.0 28.1 7713-4 4.1 1,525 14.8 13.3 28.1 1,5715 3.8 2,392 10.8 12.6 23.4 2,463Number of reasons for whichwife-beating is justified 40 3.4 3,843 11.0 10.0 21.0 2,2741-2 3.9 2,213 12.9 14.7 27.7 1,2733-4 4.3 1,536 15.6 15.9 31.5 1,0235 4.4 547 16.3 14.5 30.9 358Total 3.8 8,139 12.9 12.8 25.6 4,9281Mean excludes respond<strong>en</strong>ts who gave non-numeric responses.2See table 7.3.1 for the definition of unmet need for family planning3Restricted to curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>. See Table 15.5.1 for the list of decisions.4See Table 15.6.1 for the list of reasons15.9 WOMEN’S STATUS AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARETable 15.11 examines whether wom<strong>en</strong>’s use of ant<strong>en</strong>atal, d<strong>el</strong>ivery, and postnatal care servicesfrom health workers varies by their status as measured by the two indicators of empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. Insocieties where health care is widespread, wom<strong>en</strong>’s status may not affect their access to healthservices. In other societies, however, increased empowerm<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> is lik<strong>el</strong>y to increase theirability to seek out and use health services to better meet their own reproductive health goals, includingthe goal of safe motherhood.Table 15.11 shows indicators of reproductive health care by wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. Thedata show that the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who received ant<strong>en</strong>atal care of a live birth in the five yearsbefore the survey increases very slightly with the number of decisions in which the womanparticipates, from 91 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who do not participate in any decisions to 93 perc<strong>en</strong>t of thosewho have a say in all five decisions. Similar patterns are shown for d<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance and postnatalcare from health personn<strong>el</strong>. Table 15.11 also shows that the number of reasons that justify wifebeating is negativ<strong>el</strong>y associated with wom<strong>en</strong>’s access to ant<strong>en</strong>atal and d<strong>el</strong>ivery care by a healthprofessional.Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes | 243


Table 15.11 Reproductive health care by wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>tPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 with a live birth in the five years preceding the survey whoreceived ant<strong>en</strong>atal care, d<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance, and postnatal care from health personn<strong>el</strong> for themost rec<strong>en</strong>t birth, by indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Empowerm<strong>en</strong>tindicatorReceivedant<strong>en</strong>atal carefrom healthpersonn<strong>el</strong>Receivedd<strong>el</strong>iveryassistancefrom healthpersonn<strong>el</strong>Receivedpostnatal carefrom healthpersonn<strong>el</strong>within the firsttwo days afterd<strong>el</strong>ivery 1Number ofwom<strong>en</strong> witha child bornin the lastfive yearsNumber of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate 20 90.5 38.6 31.1 951-2 91.1 44.3 23.6 5553-4 92.6 43.8 30.2 1,0445 93.3 54.1 38.0 1,550Number of reasons for whichwife-beating is justified 30 92.8 59.9 40.1 1,7261-2 91.1 43.3 27.8 1,1023-4 91.1 36.9 26.6 8455 89.0 34.8 21.6 300Total 91.7 48.5 32.4 3,973Note: ‘Health personn<strong>el</strong>’ includes doctor, nurse, or midwife1Includes d<strong>el</strong>iveries in a health facility and not in a health facility2Restricted to curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>. See Table 15.5.1 for the list of decisions.3See Table 15.6.1 for the list of reasons244 | Wom<strong>en</strong>’s Empowerm<strong>en</strong>t and Demographic and Health Outcomes


GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 16Vane Lumumba and Mary Wanyonyi16.1 INTRODUCTIONIn rec<strong>en</strong>t years, there has be<strong>en</strong> increasing concern about viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong> in g<strong>en</strong>eral,and about domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce in particular, in both dev<strong>el</strong>oped and dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries. Not only hasdomestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong> be<strong>en</strong> acknowledged worldwide as a violation of the basic humanrights of wom<strong>en</strong>, but an increasing amount of research highlights the health burd<strong>en</strong>s, g<strong>en</strong>erationaleffects, and demographic consequ<strong>en</strong>ces of such viol<strong>en</strong>ce (United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly, 1991;Heise et al., 1994; Heise et al., 1999; Jejeebhoy, 1998). G<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce occurs across allsocioeconomic and cultural backgrounds. In many societies, including K<strong>en</strong>ya, wom<strong>en</strong> are socialisedto accept, tolerate, and ev<strong>en</strong> rationalise domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce and to remain sil<strong>en</strong>t about such experi<strong>en</strong>ces(Zimmerman, 1994). Viol<strong>en</strong>ce of any kind has a serious impact on the economy of a country; becausewom<strong>en</strong> bear the brunt of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce, they also bear the health and psychological burd<strong>en</strong>s.Victims of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce are abused inside what should be a secure <strong>en</strong>vironm<strong>en</strong>t–their ownhomes. To stop some of this viol<strong>en</strong>ce, which may cause great physical harm, death, psychologicalabuse, separation, divorce, and a host of other social ills, the K<strong>en</strong>ya governm<strong>en</strong>t has <strong>en</strong>acted theSexual Off<strong>en</strong>ces Act No. 3 of 2006 (Rev. 2007).16.2 DATA COLLECTIONG<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce is usually defined as any physical, sexual, or psychological viol<strong>en</strong>cethat occurs within the family or g<strong>en</strong>eral community. Examples include sexual harassm<strong>en</strong>t at theworkplace and trafficking in wom<strong>en</strong> for prostitution. This survey only covers domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce thatoccurs within the household. This is only the second time in the history of the Demographic andHealth Surveys (DHS) in K<strong>en</strong>ya that questions on domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce have be<strong>en</strong> included.As m<strong>en</strong>tioned earlier, there is a culture of sil<strong>en</strong>ce surrounding g<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce thatmakes collection of data on this s<strong>en</strong>sitive topic particularly chall<strong>en</strong>ging. Ev<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> who want tospeak about their experi<strong>en</strong>ces of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce may find doing so difficult because of fe<strong>el</strong>ings ofshame or fear. The need to establish rapport with the respond<strong>en</strong>t and to <strong>en</strong>sure confid<strong>en</strong>tiality andprivacy during the interview are important throughout the survey process, but they are especiallycritical to <strong>en</strong>sure the validity of the data collected on domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Complete privacy is alsoess<strong>en</strong>tial for <strong>en</strong>suring the security of the respond<strong>en</strong>t and the interviewer. Asking about or reportingviol<strong>en</strong>ce, especially in households where the perpetrator may be pres<strong>en</strong>t at the time of interview,carries the risk of further viol<strong>en</strong>ce.Giv<strong>en</strong> these concerns r<strong>el</strong>ated to the collection of data on viol<strong>en</strong>ce, organisers of the 2008-09K<strong>en</strong>ya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) took the following steps to <strong>en</strong>sure the validity of thedata and the security of respond<strong>en</strong>ts and interviewers:• The module was designed to allow the interviewer to continue the interview only ifprivacy was <strong>en</strong>sured. If privacy could not be guaranteed, the interviewer was instructed toskip the module, thank the respond<strong>en</strong>t, and <strong>en</strong>d the interview. Notably, in K<strong>en</strong>ya, lessthan one perc<strong>en</strong>t of the wom<strong>en</strong> s<strong>el</strong>ected for interviews could not be interviewed becauseof security concerns.• Only one <strong>el</strong>igible woman in each s<strong>el</strong>ected household was administered the questions ondomestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce. In households with more than one <strong>el</strong>igible woman, the womanadministered the module was randomly s<strong>el</strong>ected using a specially designed simpleG<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 245


s<strong>el</strong>ection procedure. By interviewing only one woman in each household with themodule, any security breach created by other persons in the household knowing thatinformation on domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce was being disclosed was minimised.• Informed cons<strong>en</strong>t of the respond<strong>en</strong>t was obtained for the survey at the start of theindividual interview. In addition, at the start of the domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce section, eachrespond<strong>en</strong>t was read a statem<strong>en</strong>t informing her that she was now going to be askedquestions that could be personal in nature because they explored differ<strong>en</strong>t aspects of ther<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> couples. The statem<strong>en</strong>t assured her that her answers werecomplet<strong>el</strong>y confid<strong>en</strong>tial and would not be shared with anyone <strong>el</strong>se and that no one <strong>el</strong>se inthe household would be asked these questions.Research on viol<strong>en</strong>ce suggests that the most common form of domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce for adults isspousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Thus, spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce was measured using a modified and greatly short<strong>en</strong>edconflict tactics scale (CTS) used by Strauss (1990). This scale has be<strong>en</strong> found to be effective inmeasuring domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce and can be easily adapted for use in differing cultural situations. In the2008-09 KDHS, spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce was measured using answers to the following questions:Does/Did your (last) husband/partner ever:(a) Push you, shake you, or throw something at you?(b) Slap you?(c) Twist your arm or pull your hair?(d) Punch you with his fist or with something that could hurt you?(e) Kick you or drag you or beat you up?(f) Try to choke you or burn you on purpose?(g) Threat<strong>en</strong> or attack you with a knife, gun, or any other weapon?(h) Physically force you to have sexual intercourse ev<strong>en</strong> wh<strong>en</strong> you did not want to?(i) Force you to perform any sexual acts you did not want to?The questions were asked with refer<strong>en</strong>ce to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband for wom<strong>en</strong> curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedand the last husband for wom<strong>en</strong> not curr<strong>en</strong>tly married. Wom<strong>en</strong> could answer with a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ toeach item, and in cases wh<strong>en</strong> the answer was a ‘yes’, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked about the frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of theact in the 12 months preceding the survey. A ‘yes’ to one or more items from (a) to (g) constitutesevid<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and a ‘yes’ to items (h) or (i) constitutes evid<strong>en</strong>ce of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce.A similar approach was used to measure the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Respond<strong>en</strong>tswere asked the question:Does/Did your last husband ever:(a) Say or do something to humiliate you in front of others?(b) Threat<strong>en</strong> to hurt or harm you or someone close to you?(c) Insult you or make you fe<strong>el</strong> bad about yours<strong>el</strong>f?Wom<strong>en</strong> could answer ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to each item, and for items they answered yes to, theywere asked about frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of occurr<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey.This approach of asking separat<strong>el</strong>y about specific acts has the advantage of not being affectedby differ<strong>en</strong>t understandings of what constitutes viol<strong>en</strong>ce. A woman has to say whether she has, forexample, ever be<strong>en</strong> ‘slapped’, not whether she has ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced any ‘viol<strong>en</strong>ce’. All wom<strong>en</strong> wouldprobably agree on what constitutes a slap, but what constitutes a viol<strong>en</strong>t act or is understood asviol<strong>en</strong>ce may vary across wom<strong>en</strong> as it does across cultures. In fact, summary terms such as ‘abuse’ or‘viol<strong>en</strong>ce’ were avoided in training and not used anywhere in the title, design, or implem<strong>en</strong>tation ofthe module. This approach has the advantage of giving the respond<strong>en</strong>t multiple opportunities todisclose any experi<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and, if the differ<strong>en</strong>t viol<strong>en</strong>t acts included in the list are chos<strong>en</strong>carefully, also allows the assessm<strong>en</strong>t of the severity of viol<strong>en</strong>ce.246 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


In addition to spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked if they had experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce at thehands of anyone other than their curr<strong>en</strong>t or last husband using the question: ‘From the time you were15 years old has anyone (other than your (curr<strong>en</strong>t/last) husband) hit, slapped, kicked, or done anything<strong>el</strong>se to hurt you physically?’ Wom<strong>en</strong> who responded ‘yes’ to this question were asked who had donethis and the frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of such viol<strong>en</strong>ce during the 12 months preceding the survey.Although this approach to questioning is wid<strong>el</strong>y considered to be optimal, the possibility ofsome underreporting of viol<strong>en</strong>ce cannot be <strong>en</strong>tir<strong>el</strong>y ruled out in any survey. Caution should always beexercised in interpreting not only the overall preval<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce data, but also differ<strong>en</strong>tials inpreval<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> subgroups of the population. Although a large part of any substantial differ<strong>en</strong>ce inpreval<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> subgroups undoubtedly reflects actual differ<strong>en</strong>ces in preval<strong>en</strong>ce,differ<strong>en</strong>tial underreporting by wom<strong>en</strong> in the differ<strong>en</strong>t subgroups can also contribute to exaggerating ornarrowing differ<strong>en</strong>ces in preval<strong>en</strong>ce to an unknown ext<strong>en</strong>t.In the 2008-09 KDHS, m<strong>en</strong> were not asked about their experi<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce because ofsecurity concerns. However, wom<strong>en</strong> were asked if they had ever hit, slapped, kicked, or doneanything <strong>el</strong>se to physically hurt their husbands or partners at any time wh<strong>en</strong> he was not alreadybeating or physically hurting them. They were further asked if their husbands/partners drink alcoholor take illegal drugs, as these acts are oft<strong>en</strong> associated with viol<strong>en</strong>ce.16.3 EXPERIENCE OF PHYSICAL VIOLENCETable 16.1 shows the distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce since age 15—ever and in the previous 12 months—by background characteristics. The data show that 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, with almost one in four wom<strong>en</strong> (24 perc<strong>en</strong>t) experi<strong>en</strong>cingsuch viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months before the survey.The social and economic background of a woman has a bearing on her chances ofexperi<strong>en</strong>cing physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The preval<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce g<strong>en</strong>erally increases with the ageof a woman as w<strong>el</strong>l as with the number of living childr<strong>en</strong> she has. Analysis by marital status revealsthat wom<strong>en</strong> who are divorced, separated, or widowed are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be exposed to viol<strong>en</strong>ce (60perc<strong>en</strong>t) than their married (42 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and never-married (25 perc<strong>en</strong>t) counterparts. The resultsdepict a slight negative r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce and the educationand wealth status of wom<strong>en</strong>. There are notable variations in the preval<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce acrossthe provinces. More than half (57 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce, followed by those in Western province (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi are the least lik<strong>el</strong>yto report having experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce (29 perc<strong>en</strong>t).There has be<strong>en</strong> a sizeable reduction in the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who say they haveexperi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce since age 15—from 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t reported in the 2003 KDHS to 39perc<strong>en</strong>t in the 2008-09 KDHS. The magnitude of the differ<strong>en</strong>ce makes it difficult to interpret thechange as a real decline in the lev<strong>el</strong> of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce over such a short period of time. However,since the questions and interviewer training instructions were almost id<strong>en</strong>tical in the two surveys, it isalso difficult to attribute the decline to changes in survey methods. Moreover, patterns in thepreval<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce by background characteristics are g<strong>en</strong>erally similar betwe<strong>en</strong> the twosurveys.G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 247


Table 16.1 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of physical viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce since age 15and perc<strong>en</strong>tage who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce during the 12 months preceding thesurvey, by background characteristics K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho have everexperi<strong>en</strong>cedphysicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce sinceage 15 1Perc<strong>en</strong>tage who haveexperi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>cein the past 12 monthsAny(oft<strong>en</strong> orOft<strong>en</strong> Sometimes sometimes)Number ofwom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 26.9 1.2 15.5 16.7 1,36520-24 37.5 4.9 17.1 21.9 1,24625-29 42.2 5.7 21.0 26.7 1,09730-39 43.7 8.8 19.2 28.0 1,55440-49 43.5 6.7 20.5 27.2 1,056Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 43.7 7.6 19.9 27.5 2,785Employed not for cash 45.2 6.1 22.1 28.1 916Not employed 30.8 3.0 15.8 18.9 2,615Marital statusNever married 24.7 0.8 10.5 11.3 1,982Married or livingtogether 42.1 5.9 22.2 28.1 3,688Divorced/separated/widowed 60.3 17.6 22.1 39.7 649Number of livingchildr<strong>en</strong>0 28.2 1.3 12.8 14.1 1,8401-2 37.8 5.6 18.0 23.6 1,9213-4 44.7 8.9 21.5 30.4 1,4125+ 48.7 8.0 24.8 32.9 1,145Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 34.8 6.7 14.2 21.0 1,584Rural 39.8 5.1 19.9 25.0 4,734ProvinceNairobi 28.5 5.3 10.0 15.4 546C<strong>en</strong>tral 34.1 4.9 14.6 19.5 666Coast 31.8 3.7 14.4 18.1 503Eastern 33.3 4.0 15.1 19.1 1,010Nyanza 56.6 6.8 28.9 35.8 1,046Rift Valley 35.6 5.2 19.2 24.4 1,716Western 44.5 8.3 19.9 28.2 691North Eastern 31.9 6.6 16.2 22.9 140EducationNo education 45.9 7.8 28.2 36.0 559Primary incomplete 45.5 8.9 22.9 31.8 1,957Primary complete 35.5 3.6 17.5 21.1 1,691Secondary+ 32.5 3.3 12.7 16.0 2,111Wealth quintileLowest 40.5 6.6 22.7 29.3 1,046Second 44.1 5.6 20.2 25.8 1,131Middle 41.4 5.3 21.3 26.5 1,204Fourth 36.1 3.7 18.6 22.2 1,281Highest 33.4 6.3 12.7 19.0 1,655Total 38.5 5.5 18.5 24.0 6,318Note: Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t status.1Includes in the past 12 monthsTable 16.2 shows that for wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever be<strong>en</strong> married, the main perpetrators ofphysical viol<strong>en</strong>ce are either curr<strong>en</strong>t or former husbands or partners and to a lesser ext<strong>en</strong>t, mothers orstepmothers. Among the never-married wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, the mainperpetrators are teachers, mothers and step-mothers, and fathers and step-fathers.248 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.2 Persons committing physical viol<strong>en</strong>ceAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce since age 15, perc<strong>en</strong>tage who report specific personswho committed the viol<strong>en</strong>ce, according to the respond<strong>en</strong>t’smarital status, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09PersonMarital statusEvermarriedNevermarriedTotalCurr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner 64.8 na 51.8Former husband/partner 19.1 na 15.2Curr<strong>en</strong>t boyfri<strong>en</strong>d 0.1 1.1 0.3Former boyfri<strong>en</strong>d 1.4 1.3 1.4Father/step-father 10.3 24.8 13.2Mother/step-mother 15.4 35.9 19.5Sister/brother 6.8 12.1 7.8Daughter/son 0.1 0.0 0.1Other r<strong>el</strong>ative 2.7 15.0 5.2Mother-in-law 0.2 na 0.2Father-in-law 0.2 na 0.2Other in-law 0.8 na 0.6Teacher 10.2 40.6 16.4Employer/someone at work 0.1 0.0 0.1Police/soldier 0.4 0.3 0.4Other 2.6 19.6 6.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 1,945 490 2,435na = Not applicable16.4 EXPERIENCE OF SEXUAL VIOLENCEThe 2008-09 KDHS investigatedwom<strong>en</strong>’s experi<strong>en</strong>ce of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce,including whether the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s first sexualintercourse was forced against her will. Forceat first sexual intercourse is not uncommonamong K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong>; 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 report that their first sexual intercoursewas forced against their will (Table16.3). Wom<strong>en</strong> whose age at first sex wasbefore age 15 are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to report thattheir first intercourse was forced than thosewho initiated sex at an older age.In addition to the question on whetherfirst sexual intercourse was forced, the 2008-09 KDHS included two sets of questions onsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The first set of questionsasked wom<strong>en</strong> about sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce committedby their curr<strong>en</strong>t husband or partner, if theywere curr<strong>en</strong>tly married, and by their mostTable 16.3 Force at sexual initiationAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever had sexual intercourse,perc<strong>en</strong>tage who say that their first experi<strong>en</strong>ce of sexualintercourse was forced against their will, by age at first sexualintercourse and whether the first sexual intercourse was at thetime of first marriage or before, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age/timing of first intercoursePerc<strong>en</strong>tage whosefirst sexualintercourse wasforced againsttheir willNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong> whohave everhad sexAge at first sexual intercourse


Table 16.4 shows that one in five K<strong>en</strong>yanwom<strong>en</strong> (21 perc<strong>en</strong>t) has experi<strong>en</strong>ced sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce.The lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of experi<strong>en</strong>cing physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce increases with the age of wom<strong>en</strong>, from only 11perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age 15-19 to 29 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age40-49. Particularly striking is the fact that more thanone-third of wom<strong>en</strong> who are divorced, separated, orwidowed have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, comparedwith only 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who are curr<strong>en</strong>tlymarried and 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of never-married wom<strong>en</strong>.Analysis across provinces indicates that the twoprovinces with the highest proportions of wom<strong>en</strong>experi<strong>en</strong>cing physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce—Nyanza and Westernprovinces—also have the highest proportions of wom<strong>en</strong>experi<strong>en</strong>cing sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong>preval<strong>en</strong>ce of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce and both education lev<strong>el</strong>and wealth status of wom<strong>en</strong> is not very strong;however, it is clear from the results that wom<strong>en</strong> withsecondary or higher education and those in the top twowealth quintiles are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to experi<strong>en</strong>ce sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce than their counterparts.Table 16.5 shows information on the types ofpersons who are reported to have committed sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong>. In the vast majority of cases,sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce is perpetrated by persons known to thevictims; strangers account for only 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t of sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce. As se<strong>en</strong> from the results in the table, 37perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce report curr<strong>en</strong>t husbands or partners as theperpetrators, followed by curr<strong>en</strong>t or former boyfri<strong>en</strong>ds(16 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and former husbands or partners (13perc<strong>en</strong>t). It is worth noting that among ever-marriedwom<strong>en</strong>, sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce is perpetrated mainly bycurr<strong>en</strong>t and former husbands and partners. Among thosewho have never married, the viol<strong>en</strong>ce is committedmainly by boyfri<strong>en</strong>ds, although almost one in fiv<strong>en</strong>ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t) has be<strong>en</strong> violated bya fri<strong>en</strong>d or acquaintance and almost as many by astranger (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 16.4 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>cedsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, by background characteristics,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage whohave everexperi<strong>en</strong>cedsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 1Number ofwom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 11.3 1,36520-24 19.5 1,24625-29 20.7 1,09730-39 24.1 1,55440-49 28.6 1,056Employed last12 monthsEmployed for cash 25.4 2,785Employed not for cash 25.0 916Not employed 14.0 2,615Marital statusNever married 9.9 1,982Married or livingtogether 23.6 3,688Divorced/separated/widowed 36.1 649Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 18.7 1,584Rural 21.2 4,734ProvinceNairobi 14.5 546C<strong>en</strong>tral 19.5 666Coast 16.4 503Eastern 17.4 1,010Nyanza 31.6 1,046Rift Valley 19.0 1,716Western 24.7 691North Eastern 5.8 140EducationNo education 24.2 559Primary incomplete 24.3 1,957Primary complete 22.3 1,691Secondary+ 14.8 2,111Wealth quintileLowest 22.8 1,046Second 22.9 1,131Middle 21.5 1,204Fourth 19.2 1,281Highest 18.1 1,655Total 20.6 6,318Note: Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information asto employm<strong>en</strong>t status.1Includes those whose sexual initiation was forcedagainst their willTable 16.6 shows, by age, the perc<strong>en</strong>tages ofwom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced differ<strong>en</strong>t combinations ofphysical and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Overall, almost half (45 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 have experi<strong>en</strong>cedeither physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Specifically, 25 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> have experi<strong>en</strong>ced only physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce, 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t have experi<strong>en</strong>ced only sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t have experi<strong>en</strong>ced bothphysical and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of experi<strong>en</strong>cing either physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ceincreases with the age of the wom<strong>en</strong>.250 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.5 Persons committing sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ceAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce, perc<strong>en</strong>tage who report specific persons committingsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce according to curr<strong>en</strong>t marital status, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09PersonMarital statusEvermarriedNevermarriedTotalCurr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner 43.7 na 37.2Former husband/partner 15.6 na 13.3Curr<strong>en</strong>t/former boyfri<strong>en</strong>d 12.5 37.0 16.2Father 0.1 0.0 0.1Other r<strong>el</strong>ative 3.0 4.6 3.2In-law 0.8 0.0 0.7Own fri<strong>en</strong>d/acquaintance 6.4 18.7 8.2Family fri<strong>en</strong>d 1.3 2.7 1.5Teacher 1.3 0.0 1.1Employer/someone at work 0.3 0.3 0.3Police/soldier 0.1 0.0 0.1Stranger 4.3 17.1 6.2Other 4.1 11.2 5.1Missing 6.5 8.5 6.8Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 1,106 196 1,302na = Not applicableTable 16.6 Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of differ<strong>en</strong>t forms of viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced differ<strong>en</strong>t forms ofviol<strong>en</strong>ce by curr<strong>en</strong>t age, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgePhysicalviol<strong>en</strong>ceonlySexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceonly 1Physicaland sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce 1Physical orsexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce 1Number ofwom<strong>en</strong>15-19 21.8 6.3 5.1 33.2 1,36515-17 19.9 6.0 5.3 31.2 80818-19 24.6 6.7 4.7 36.0 55720-24 23.7 5.7 13.8 43.2 1,24625-29 28.6 7.2 13.5 49.4 1,09730-39 25.6 6.0 18.1 49.7 1,55440-49 23.0 8.1 20.5 51.6 1,056Total 24.5 6.6 14.0 45.1 6,3181Includes forced sexual initiation16.5 MARITAL CONTROLG<strong>en</strong>der-based viol<strong>en</strong>ce is not restricted to physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Verbal abuse, restrictions infreedom of movem<strong>en</strong>t, and withholding of funds can also constitute viol<strong>en</strong>t behaviour. Accordingly,wom<strong>en</strong> interviewed in the 2008-09 KDHS were also asked about various ways in which theirhusbands/marital partners try to control their actions. Specifically, ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> were asked iftheir husband:• Is jealous or angry if she communicates with other m<strong>en</strong>• Frequ<strong>en</strong>tly accuses her of being unfaithful• Does not permit her to see her female fri<strong>en</strong>ds• Tries to limit her contact with her family• Insists on knowing where she is at all times• Does not trust her with any moneyG<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 251


Table 16.7 Degree of marital control exercised by husbandsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 whose husband/partner ever demonstrates specific types of controlling behaviors, according tobackground characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicIs jealous orangry if shetalks toother m<strong>en</strong>Frequ<strong>en</strong>tlyaccuses herof beingunfaithfulDoes notpermit herto meet herfemalefri<strong>en</strong>dsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> whose husband:Tries to limither contactwith herfamilyInsists onknowingwhere she isat all timesDoes nottrust herwith anymoneyDisplays 3or more ofthe specificbehaviorsDisplaysnone of thespecificbehaviorsNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 51.3 15.2 15.8 7.1 35.9 15.5 19.1 30.9 17020-24 50.6 18.2 21.3 15.7 37.9 20.4 26.8 36.1 81125-29 52.6 19.0 22.5 15.5 37.6 20.4 28.9 33.7 91730-39 49.6 21.1 20.1 14.4 37.3 23.1 27.6 35.9 1,45040-49 44.3 18.9 17.1 13.6 33.6 21.3 23.8 39.8 988Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 50.2 20.3 20.5 15.2 38.0 24.8 28.1 35.1 2,194Employed not for cash 48.9 16.2 21.9 14.3 33.8 20.1 25.0 34.3 767Not employed 48.0 19.6 18.1 13.1 35.9 16.5 24.9 39.0 1,373Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 47.3 15.6 12.2 7.6 37.6 13.5 18.5 36.7 2521-2 50.6 17.7 19.4 13.2 36.4 20.3 26.1 36.7 1,5943-4 48.8 20.7 21.8 16.5 37.2 23.3 28.0 35.1 1,3735+ 48.4 21.0 20.3 15.0 35.8 22.1 27.1 36.5 1,117Marital status anddurationCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married woman 47.0 16.5 17.6 12.2 33.8 19.4 23.3 38.0 3,688Married only once 46.5 15.9 17.3 12.0 33.3 19.2 22.8 38.5 3,4890-4 years 47.3 13.7 16.4 10.8 32.3 16.1 20.2 40.7 8305-9 years 48.0 15.4 18.8 13.1 33.1 19.1 23.7 36.3 85310+ years 45.4 17.2 17.0 12.1 33.8 20.7 23.5 38.6 1,807Married more than once 55.8 27.3 21.9 15.6 43.0 22.0 31.7 28.7 199Divorced/separated/widowed 62.4 35.5 33.7 26.6 52.2 32.5 45.1 25.6 649Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 50.3 18.0 19.7 13.1 36.2 22.1 27.6 37.7 1,022Rural 49.0 19.8 20.1 14.8 36.7 21.1 26.2 35.7 3,314ProvinceNairobi 48.4 21.5 13.0 11.7 37.3 21.7 28.4 41.1 320C<strong>en</strong>tral 42.6 11.4 12.7 9.8 35.6 33.4 23.0 37.0 495Coast 49.2 22.0 16.0 11.5 41.9 18.3 26.3 34.5 365Eastern 57.0 19.7 21.0 13.8 33.5 20.1 25.9 32.0 702Nyanza 46.8 23.4 24.9 16.2 34.3 24.6 29.9 35.1 774Rift Valley 48.8 17.6 22.2 17.2 36.4 17.8 25.8 37.7 1,112Western 55.5 24.3 23.3 17.0 45.6 18.7 29.7 30.0 458North Eastern 30.3 6.9 8.5 4.0 21.7 7.4 12.7 67.1 110EducationNo education 47.3 23.4 17.6 15.5 40.1 19.9 28.5 36.3 513Primary incomplete 52.7 25.3 24.7 18.8 40.6 24.6 30.2 32.8 1,364Primary complete 47.8 17.1 16.7 12.9 34.6 19.4 25.3 36.7 1,228Secondary+ 47.8 13.4 19.1 10.4 32.7 20.2 22.9 39.3 1,230Wealth quintileLowest 49.4 24.0 21.2 19.7 37.8 21.9 30.3 35.5 784Second 49.1 21.9 19.8 15.5 38.2 20.8 25.3 33.8 793Middle 50.4 21.2 23.0 14.3 40.1 21.0 29.2 34.2 845Fourth 47.8 15.1 17.7 11.1 34.4 21.3 23.5 37.4 849Highest 49.7 16.0 18.7 12.3 33.4 21.6 24.9 39.0 1,064Total 49.3 19.4 20.0 14.4 36.6 21.3 26.5 36.2 4,336Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for divorced,separated or widowed wom<strong>en</strong>. Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t status.Table 16.7 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> whose husbands have demonstratedvarious types of controlling behaviours. The data show that the most commonly reported controllingbehaviour exhibited by husbands is to be jealous or angry wh<strong>en</strong> the woman talks to other m<strong>en</strong>(reported by 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong>). More than one-third of wom<strong>en</strong> report that theirhusbands insist on knowing where they are at all times (37 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and about one in five wom<strong>en</strong>252 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


says her husband does not trust her with money (21 perc<strong>en</strong>t), does not permit her to meet femalefri<strong>en</strong>ds (20 perc<strong>en</strong>t), or frequ<strong>en</strong>tly accuses her of being unfaithful (19 perc<strong>en</strong>t). A less commonbehaviour is trying to limit her contact with her family (14 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Tw<strong>en</strong>ty-sev<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of evermarriedwom<strong>en</strong> say their husbands display at least three of the six types of controlling behaviours,while 36 perc<strong>en</strong>t say their husbands do not display any of the behaviours.Wom<strong>en</strong> who are divorced, separated, or widowed are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to report that their curr<strong>en</strong>tor last husband displayed controlling behaviours than are wom<strong>en</strong> who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married.Similarly, those who have be<strong>en</strong> married more than once are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than those in their firstmarriage to say that their husbands try to control their actions. There is no clear corr<strong>el</strong>ation betwe<strong>en</strong>the proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> who report that their husbands show controlling behaviours and either thewoman’s educational lev<strong>el</strong> or wealth status. There are remarkably small differ<strong>en</strong>ces in marital controlbehaviours by age, employm<strong>en</strong>t status, and urban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce. Similarly, the proportions ofwom<strong>en</strong> who say their husbands display at least three of the controlling behaviours differ very little byprovince, except that they are lowest in North Eastern province for all types of behaviours.16.6 MARITAL VIOLENCEMarital viol<strong>en</strong>ce refers to viol<strong>en</strong>ce perpetrated by partners in a marital union. In the 2008-09KDHS, curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> were asked about viol<strong>en</strong>ce perpetrated by their curr<strong>en</strong>t husband, andformerly married wom<strong>en</strong> were asked about viol<strong>en</strong>ce perpetrated by their most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband.Respond<strong>en</strong>ts were asked about sev<strong>en</strong> specific acts of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, two of sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, andthree of emotional abuse. Table 16.8 shows the proportion of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> who haveexperi<strong>en</strong>ced each of these specific forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce at the hands of their curr<strong>en</strong>t or former husbands.The differ<strong>en</strong>t types of viol<strong>en</strong>ce are not mutually exclusive; therefore, wom<strong>en</strong> may report experi<strong>en</strong>cingmultiple forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce.The data show that 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce bya husband, 17 perc<strong>en</strong>t have experi<strong>en</strong>ced sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t have experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotionalviol<strong>en</strong>ce. Overall, almost one-half of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> (47 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have experi<strong>en</strong>ced some kindof viol<strong>en</strong>ce (physical, sexual, or emotional) by a husband or live-in partner. Much of the viol<strong>en</strong>ce iscurr<strong>en</strong>t; within the last 12 months, 31 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, 14 perc<strong>en</strong>texperi<strong>en</strong>ced sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and 28 perc<strong>en</strong>t experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce.Among the spousal acts of physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, slapping was the most commonly reported act,experi<strong>en</strong>ced by 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong>, followed by being pushed, shak<strong>en</strong>, or having hadsomething thrown at them—reported by 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> (Figure 16.1). Fifte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> say their husbands kicked, dragged, or otherwise beat them. Fourte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> reportthat they were forced to have sex with their husbands wh<strong>en</strong> they did not want to, and 23 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> were insulted or made to fe<strong>el</strong> bad about thems<strong>el</strong>ves.G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 253


Table 16.8 Forms of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced various forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce ever orin the 12 months preceding the survey, committed by their husband/partner, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Form of viol<strong>en</strong>ceEverOft<strong>en</strong>In the past 12 months 1SometimesOft<strong>en</strong> orsometimesAny physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce 37.0 7.9 23.4 31.3Pushed her, shook her, or threw something at her 19.7 4.5 12.3 16.8Slapped her 32.3 5.9 20.9 26.8Twisted her arm or pulled her hair 10.0 2.9 6.1 9.0Punched her with his fist or with something thatcould hurt her 12.9 3.4 7.7 11.1Kicked her, dragged her, or beat her up 15.4 3.7 9.1 12.8Tried to choke her or burn her on purpose 3.1 0.7 2.0 2.7Threat<strong>en</strong>ed her or attacked her with a knife, gun, orany other weapon 4.5 1.0 3.2 4.2Any sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 17.2 3.7 9.9 13.6Physically forced her to have sexual intercoursewith him ev<strong>en</strong> wh<strong>en</strong> she did not want to 14.0 3.5 9.7 13.2Forced her to perform any sexual acts she did notwant to 4.3 1.0 3.0 4.0Sexual initiation was with curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>thusband and was forced 2 3.9 na na naAny emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce 29.5 9.6 18.2 27.8Said or did something to humiliate her in front ofothers 17.2 5.5 11.1 16.6Threat<strong>en</strong>ed to hurt or harm her or someone closeto her 15.2 3.6 10.0 13.5Insulted her or made her fe<strong>el</strong> bad about hers<strong>el</strong>f 22.8 7.8 13.7 21.5Any form of physical and/or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 41.2 9.2 24.7 34.0Any form of physical and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 13.0 2.4 7.6 10.1Any form of emotional, physical, and/or sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce 46.8 13.1 27.6 40.7Any form of emotional, physical, and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 10.1 1.8 4.8 6.6Number of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> 4,336 4,047 4,047 4,047Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the mostrec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for divorced, separated, or widowed wom<strong>en</strong>.1Excludes widows2Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> who have be<strong>en</strong> married more than once since their sexual initiation could not havebe<strong>en</strong> with the curr<strong>en</strong>t/most rec<strong>en</strong>t partner.na = Not applicableFigure 16.1 Domestic Viol<strong>en</strong>cePushed her, shook her, orInsert your really long category name herethrew something at her20Insert your really long category Slapped name here32Insert your Twisted really her long arm category pulled name her here hair10Punched her with his fist or withInsert your really long category name heresomething that could hurt her13Insert Kicked your her, really dragged long category her, beat name her here up15Insert Tried to your choke really her long or burn category her name on purpose here3Threat<strong>en</strong>ed her or attacked her withInsert your really long category name herea knife, gun, or any other weaponPhysically forced her to have sexualInsert your really long category name hereintercourse ev<strong>en</strong> wh<strong>en</strong> she did not want toForced her to perform anyInsert your really long category name heresexual acts she did not want to54140 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Perc<strong>en</strong>tNote: Refers to the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce by their husband or co-habiting partner.254 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


There have be<strong>en</strong> only minor changes in the lev<strong>el</strong> of marital viol<strong>en</strong>ce since 2003. Except forphysical viol<strong>en</strong>ce, which declined slightly (from 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2003 to 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t in 2008-09), theresults indicate a slight increase in the magnitude of sexual and emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce (from 16 to 17perc<strong>en</strong>t and from 26 to 30 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). 1Table 16.9 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> who have suffered emotional,physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce at the hands of their curr<strong>en</strong>t or last husbands or partners, according tos<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced thediffer<strong>en</strong>t forms of viol<strong>en</strong>ce t<strong>en</strong>ds to increase with wom<strong>en</strong>’s age and number of childr<strong>en</strong>. Wom<strong>en</strong> whoare not employed are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to experi<strong>en</strong>ce spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce than wom<strong>en</strong> who are employed.Experi<strong>en</strong>ce of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce shows a strong r<strong>el</strong>ationship with marital status. Wom<strong>en</strong> who aredivorced, separated, or widowed are much more lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced each type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce thanare curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>, which suggests that experi<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce may increase the lik<strong>el</strong>ihoodof marital dissolution. Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> who have be<strong>en</strong> married more than once are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> in their first marriages to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ceby their curr<strong>en</strong>t husbands.Wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza province are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional, physical, orsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by their husbands (60 perc<strong>en</strong>t), followed by wom<strong>en</strong> in Western province (56 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Least lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced any type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce are wom<strong>en</strong> in Nairobi (30 perc<strong>en</strong>t) and NorthEastern province (37 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Wom<strong>en</strong> who have att<strong>en</strong>ded secondary school are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to havesuffered each type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce at the hands of their husband. Spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce decreases gradually aswealth quintile increases; 53 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in the lowest wealth quintile have experi<strong>en</strong>cedemotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce compared with 40 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in the highest wealthquintile. Table 16.9 also shows that wom<strong>en</strong> whose fathers beat their mothers are more lik<strong>el</strong>ythems<strong>el</strong>ves to experi<strong>en</strong>ce physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce than wom<strong>en</strong> whose fathers did not beat theirmothers.1 Data are not <strong>en</strong>tir<strong>el</strong>y comparable, since the figures for 2003 exclude widows who were included in the 2008-09data. Because the number of widows was small, this differ<strong>en</strong>ce is not lik<strong>el</strong>y to affect the overall tr<strong>en</strong>ds.G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 255


Table 16.9 Spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce by background characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by whether they have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>cecommitted by their husband/partner, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicEmotionalviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysicalviol<strong>en</strong>ceSexualviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysical orsexualviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysicaland sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceEmotional,physical, orsexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceEmotional,physical,and sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 20.3 25.4 9.8 29.6 5.6 34.2 4.8 17020-24 25.5 34.0 16.8 38.6 12.2 42.8 9.6 81125-29 30.2 36.7 15.8 40.7 11.8 46.0 9.7 91730-39 31.3 37.4 17.6 41.3 13.8 47.9 11.3 1,45040-49 31.0 40.9 19.6 45.5 15.0 51.4 9.9 988Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 33.5 40.5 20.6 45.5 15.6 51.8 12.2 2,194Employed not for cash 33.8 40.5 19.8 44.4 15.9 51.3 12.2 767Not employed 20.7 29.3 10.4 32.4 7.3 36.5 5.7 1,373Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 16.7 18.1 13.0 24.9 6.2 28.9 5.0 2521-2 27.1 32.5 12.6 34.9 10.1 40.7 8.2 1,5943-4 31.6 38.4 17.8 42.4 13.8 47.6 11.4 1,3735+ 33.2 45.8 24.0 52.2 17.6 58.7 12.4 1,117Marital status and durationCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married 27.3 34.2 15.8 38.4 11.6 44.5 8.7 3,688Married only once 26.9 34.1 15.8 38.3 11.6 44.3 8.6 3,4890-4 years 16.8 22.7 10.8 26.3 7.1 30.6 5.4 8305-9 years 28.4 33.2 13.7 36.9 10.0 43.3 8.6 85310+ years 30.8 39.8 19.0 44.5 14.4 50.9 10.1 1,807Married more than once 34.6 35.4 17.1 40.9 11.7 49.5 10.3 199Divorced/separated/widowed 41.9 52.8 25.0 56.6 21.2 59.9 18.0 649Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 29.7 30.6 15.2 35.1 10.7 41.6 9.2 1,022Rural 29.4 38.9 17.8 43.0 13.7 48.5 10.4 3,314ProvinceNairobi 22.2 23.4 8.3 24.2 7.5 30.4 6.4 320C<strong>en</strong>tral 29.4 33.7 13.3 37.6 9.4 42.9 7.4 495Coast 33.1 24.2 17.5 32.9 8.8 42.1 7.9 365Eastern 29.7 28.9 14.5 33.4 10.0 43.2 8.0 702Nyanza 38.7 51.3 22.3 54.6 19.0 59.5 14.8 774Rift Valley 26.0 37.5 19.3 41.9 14.9 45.6 10.4 1,112Western 27.6 48.1 20.7 52.4 16.4 55.9 13.8 458North Eastern 16.1 32.7 4.5 33.8 3.4 36.6 2.2 110EducationNo education 29.2 44.0 19.7 49.4 14.2 53.1 10.0 513Primary incomplete 37.3 46.0 20.6 48.9 17.6 54.5 14.4 1,364Primary complete 26.6 34.6 17.9 40.5 12.0 45.8 8.6 1,228Secondary+ 23.9 26.4 11.8 29.8 8.4 36.8 6.9 1,230Wealth quintileLowest 32.2 43.5 19.3 48.0 14.9 53.4 10.8 784Second 29.3 41.2 19.2 46.0 14.4 50.0 10.7 793Middle 29.5 38.6 18.1 41.8 14.9 47.0 11.7 845Fourth 28.9 35.8 15.8 40.0 11.6 46.3 9.1 849Highest 28.2 28.6 14.6 33.0 10.2 39.9 8.7 1,064Respond<strong>en</strong>t’s father beather motherYes 37.4 49.4 22.6 54.6 17.4 59.6 14.1 1,613No 24.2 28.7 13.7 32.4 10.1 38.6 7.5 2,398Don’t know 29.4 35.8 16.4 39.6 12.6 43.9 9.2 321Total 29.5 37.0 17.2 41.2 13.0 46.8 10.1 4,336Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner fordivorced, separated, or widowed wom<strong>en</strong>. Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t status and 5 missinginformation about mother’s abuse by father.256 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.10 shows similar information about spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce according to characteristics ofthe husband and indicators of wom<strong>en</strong>’s empowerm<strong>en</strong>t. The information shows that wom<strong>en</strong> whosespouses have completed primary school are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced some kind of viol<strong>en</strong>ce thanare those whose husbands have either no education or only some primary school. The results furtherreveal a strong positive r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> alcohol consumption and the t<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy to be viol<strong>en</strong>t.Wom<strong>en</strong> whose husbands are oft<strong>en</strong> drunk are twice as lik<strong>el</strong>y to experi<strong>en</strong>ce emotional, physical, orsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce as those whose spouses do not drink alcohol (79 and 39 perc<strong>en</strong>t).Table 16.10 Spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband’s characteristics and empowerm<strong>en</strong>t indicatorsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever suffered emotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce committed by theirhusband/partner, according to his characteristics, marital characteristics, and empowerm<strong>en</strong>t indicators, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Husband’s characteristic/empowerm<strong>en</strong>t indicatorEmotionalviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysicalviol<strong>en</strong>ceSexualviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysical orsexualviol<strong>en</strong>cePhysicaland sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceEmotional,physical orsexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceEmotional,physicaland sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ceNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>Husband’s/partner’seducationNo education 32.6 42.2 23.0 46.7 18.5 51.2 13.0 414Primary incomplete 37.2 45.5 22.0 49.6 18.0 56.3 14.5 849Primary complete 27.0 33.9 15.0 38.1 10.8 43.6 8.5 3,069Husband’s/partner’s alcoholconsumptionDoes not drink alcohol 22.1 29.2 11.9 33.8 7.3 39.2 5.3 2,648Drinks alcohol but is neverdrunk * * * * * * * 9Is sometimes drunk 29.0 36.0 17.5 40.3 13.3 47.3 9.3 1,061Is oft<strong>en</strong> drunk 61.4 72.2 38.2 74.7 35.7 79.2 30.4 584Spousal age differ<strong>en</strong>ce 1Wife older 28.1 35.0 21.3 39.9 16.4 45.0 16.1 83Wife is same age 15.4 23.7 12.2 26.9 9.0 33.1 5.5 88Wife is 1-4 years younger 23.5 29.7 15.4 34.2 10.9 40.5 7.7 1,118Wife is 5-9 years younger 28.8 36.4 16.9 40.9 12.4 46.7 9.2 1,443Wife is 10+ years younger 30.8 37.7 15.0 41.5 11.2 47.5 9.1 932Spousal education differ<strong>en</strong>ceHusband has more education 31.4 40.1 17.6 44.7 13.0 50.1 10.1 2,083Wife has more education 33.5 38.3 21.4 42.1 17.5 49.5 14.0 984Both have equal education 22.1 28.7 11.7 32.2 8.3 37.1 6.9 942Neither has any education 26.2 39.8 17.8 44.6 13.1 48.2 7.6 260Number of marital controlbehaviors displayed byhusband/partner0 13.8 19.5 6.9 22.5 3.8 26.3 2.0 1,5681-2 24.4 34.3 15.0 39.9 9.5 47.0 6.3 1,6183-4 49.7 58.3 28.6 62.6 24.3 69.0 20.0 7995-6 77.0 78.7 47.3 81.4 44.6 87.4 41.3 351Number of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate 10 24.9 38.2 12.7 41.5 9.4 51.0 7.0 991-2 25.4 36.0 15.7 41.9 9.9 47.2 7.2 5633-4 33.1 38.9 17.9 42.4 14.4 49.6 11.1 1,1815 24.3 30.4 14.7 34.7 10.4 40.1 7.7 1,844Number of reasons for whichwife-beating is justified0 25.1 28.8 12.1 32.4 8.5 39.0 7.1 1,9901-2 30.0 41.9 20.5 46.7 15.7 51.2 10.2 1,0823-4 37.0 44.4 22.9 49.3 18.0 54.8 15.1 9665 32.9 49.1 21.1 53.1 17.1 57.4 13.7 298Total 29.5 37.0 17.2 41.2 13.0 46.8 10.1 4,336Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner fordivorced, separated, or widowed wom<strong>en</strong>. Total includes 4 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information about husband’s/partner’s education, 34missing information on husband’s/partner’s alcohol consumption, 24 missing spousal age differ<strong>en</strong>ce, and 68 missing spousaleducation differ<strong>en</strong>ce. An asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted wom<strong>en</strong> that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Includes only curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 257


Analysis by spousal age differ<strong>en</strong>ces reveals that wom<strong>en</strong> who are the same age as theirhusbands are less lik<strong>el</strong>y to experi<strong>en</strong>ce viol<strong>en</strong>ce than are those who are either older or younger thantheir husbands. There is a similar pattern for differ<strong>en</strong>ces in spousal education attainm<strong>en</strong>t in thatspouses with equal education t<strong>en</strong>d to experi<strong>en</strong>ce less viol<strong>en</strong>ce. However, wom<strong>en</strong> with more educationthan their spouses t<strong>en</strong>d to be more exposed to emotional and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce.The number of marital control behaviours displayed by the husband is highly associated withthe preval<strong>en</strong>ce of viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The more controlling behaviours that the husband displays, the greater isthe lik<strong>el</strong>ihood that the wife will report experi<strong>en</strong>ce of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce. The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> whohave experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce increases from 26 perc<strong>en</strong>t among thosewhose husbands display none of the controlling behaviours to 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t among those whosehusbands display 5 or 6 of the behaviours.Marital viol<strong>en</strong>ce g<strong>en</strong>erally t<strong>en</strong>ds to decline slightly as the number of decisions in whichwom<strong>en</strong> participate increases, though the pattern is not uniform. Experi<strong>en</strong>ce with viol<strong>en</strong>ce increaseswith the number of reasons for which wom<strong>en</strong> fe<strong>el</strong> that wife-beating is justified.16.7 FREQUENCY OF SPOUSAL VIOLENCEFrequ<strong>en</strong>cy of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce is an indication of the ext<strong>en</strong>t to which domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce is acurr<strong>en</strong>t or recurring problem for K<strong>en</strong>yan wom<strong>en</strong>. Table 16.11 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of evermarriedwom<strong>en</strong> who report emotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by their curr<strong>en</strong>t or last husband.Viol<strong>en</strong>ce is shown by its frequ<strong>en</strong>cy in the 12 months prior to the survey and by s<strong>el</strong>ected backgroundcharacteristics.This table shows that 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce bytheir husbands experi<strong>en</strong>ced such viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey; 31 perc<strong>en</strong>texperi<strong>en</strong>ced emotional abuse oft<strong>en</strong>. Similarly, 82 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical orsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by their husbands experi<strong>en</strong>ced such viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey,and 22 perc<strong>en</strong>t experi<strong>en</strong>ced such viol<strong>en</strong>ce oft<strong>en</strong>.Among wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced spousal emotional, physical, or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce,the lik<strong>el</strong>ihood of experi<strong>en</strong>cing such viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the past 12 months decreases with increasing age.Among wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced marital abuse, the proportion that experi<strong>en</strong>ced abuse oft<strong>en</strong>in the 12 months before the survey is considerably higher among those who are divorced or separatedthan among those who are curr<strong>en</strong>tly married. Rural wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce ar<strong>el</strong>ess lik<strong>el</strong>y than urban wom<strong>en</strong> to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce at all in the 12 months before the survey.By province, wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern and C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced spousalemotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced such viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months before thesurvey. Wom<strong>en</strong> in Western and C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced spousal physical orsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to have experi<strong>en</strong>ced such viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months before the survey.258 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.11 Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce among those who report viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 (excluding widows) who have ever suffered emotional viol<strong>en</strong>ce committed bytheir curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner by frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey and perc<strong>en</strong>t distributionof those who have ever suffered physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce committed by their curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner by frequ<strong>en</strong>cy ofviol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicOft<strong>en</strong>Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of emotional viol<strong>en</strong>cein the past 12 monthsSometimesNot at all TotalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Oft<strong>en</strong>Frequ<strong>en</strong>cy of physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>cein the past 12 monthsSometimesNot at all TotalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 4.4 90.2 5.5 100.0 33 10.9 83.0 6.1 100.0 4920-24 33.1 59.5 7.4 100.0 196 21.7 65.7 12.7 100.0 28825-29 25.7 70.4 3.9 100.0 264 18.2 65.0 16.8 100.0 34530-39 38.0 50.4 11.6 100.0 440 26.8 54.7 18.4 100.0 54340-49 27.5 57.4 15.0 100.0 263 21.5 55.9 22.6 100.0 354Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 35.9 56.7 7.4 100.0 684 25.1 57.3 17.6 100.0 863Employed not for cash 29.4 59.5 11.1 100.0 242 19.6 62.0 18.3 100.0 311Not employed 21.3 64.0 14.7 100.0 270 18.6 64.7 16.8 100.0 406Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 25.4 55.7 18.9 100.0 41 20.8 67.1 12.1 100.0 501-2 30.7 63.3 6.0 100.0 410 21.3 64.6 14.2 100.0 5253-4 33.8 55.2 10.9 100.0 398 25.8 56.8 17.4 100.0 5115+ 29.7 58.4 11.9 100.0 348 20.0 58.2 21.8 100.0 494Marital status and durationCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married 26.7 64.2 9.1 100.0 999 18.8 64.0 17.2 100.0 1,343Married only once 26.4 64.0 9.5 100.0 930 18.6 64.0 17.5 100.0 1,2620-4 years 24.1 71.7 4.2 100.0 135 14.5 76.1 9.4 100.0 2055-9 years 22.4 71.0 6.6 100.0 241 19.1 66.9 14.0 100.0 30110+ years 28.8 59.1 12.1 100.0 554 19.4 59.5 21.0 100.0 757Married more than once 29.9 66.3 3.7 100.0 69 22.4 63.9 13.7 100.0 81Divorced/separated 54.6 32.3 13.1 100.0 198 42.4 38.2 19.4 100.0 237Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 39.6 55.7 4.7 100.0 291 29.9 57.5 12.7 100.0 328Rural 28.6 60.0 11.4 100.0 905 20.3 60.8 18.8 100.0 1,252ProvinceNairobi 47.7 51.6 0.7 100.0 70 31.5 59.9 8.6 100.0 76C<strong>en</strong>tral 28.8 52.3 18.9 100.0 134 18.9 55.6 25.5 100.0 164Coast 25.0 63.8 11.2 100.0 113 21.0 57.8 21.1 100.0 101Eastern 24.7 61.8 13.5 100.0 198 23.1 58.9 18.0 100.0 213Nyanza 26.2 65.6 8.2 100.0 264 19.0 64.5 16.5 100.0 359Rift Valley 33.7 61.5 4.8 100.0 282 20.9 67.8 11.3 100.0 418Western 47.8 41.2 10.9 100.0 118 29.4 43.8 26.8 100.0 213North Eastern 26.6 50.6 22.8 100.0 17 25.1 58.8 16.1 100.0 35EducationNo education 32.1 58.8 9.2 100.0 137 21.2 67.6 11.2 100.0 216Primary incomplete 34.4 55.4 10.3 100.0 475 28.2 55.3 16.4 100.0 598Primary complete 28.1 62.6 9.3 100.0 304 16.7 65.1 18.2 100.0 437Secondary+ 29.1 61.0 9.8 100.0 281 19.7 57.4 22.9 100.0 330Wealth quintileLowest 29.3 59.4 11.3 100.0 235 23.3 61.1 15.6 100.0 331Second 28.2 62.5 9.3 100.0 206 19.9 57.3 22.8 100.0 307Middle 28.5 58.8 12.7 100.0 230 22.8 61.8 15.4 100.0 307Fourth 24.9 61.8 13.4 100.0 233 16.4 62.7 20.9 100.0 308Highest 42.3 53.8 3.9 100.0 292 28.7 57.8 13.5 100.0 326Total 31.3 58.9 9.8 100.0 1,196 22.3 60.1 17.6 100.0 1,580Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner fordivorced or separated wom<strong>en</strong>.16.8 PHYSICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SPOUSAL VIOLENCEIn the 2008-09 KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong> who ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced spousal physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>cewere asked about the consequ<strong>en</strong>ces of the viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Specifically, they were asked if, as a consequ<strong>en</strong>ceof what their husbands did to them, they ever had any of three differ<strong>en</strong>t sets of physical injuries: (1)cuts, bruises, or aches; (2) eye injuries, sprains, dislocations, or burns; and (3) deep wounds, brok<strong>en</strong>bones, brok<strong>en</strong> teeth, or any other serious injury. Table 16.12 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-marriedG<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 259


wom<strong>en</strong> who reported any spousal physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by the differ<strong>en</strong>t types of physicalconsequ<strong>en</strong>ces according to the type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce experi<strong>en</strong>ced.Almost one-third (32 perc<strong>en</strong>t) of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical orsexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by their curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband report one or more types of injuries resultingfrom the viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Wom<strong>en</strong> were most lik<strong>el</strong>y to report having experi<strong>en</strong>ced cuts, bruises, or aches; 28perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> report such symptoms r<strong>el</strong>ated to the viol<strong>en</strong>ce they experi<strong>en</strong>ced. Fourte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong> who experi<strong>en</strong>ced spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce say that they suffered eye injuries, sprains, dislocations, orburns as a result of the viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Wom<strong>en</strong> are least lik<strong>el</strong>y to report having suffered the most severeinjuries; neverth<strong>el</strong>ess, almost one in t<strong>en</strong> wom<strong>en</strong> who has experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by ahusband reported suffering deep wounds, brok<strong>en</strong> bones, brok<strong>en</strong> teeth, or other serious injuries.Table 16.12 Injuries to wom<strong>en</strong> due to spousal viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced specific types of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce bytypes of injuries resulting from what their husband/partner did to them, according to the type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce andwhether they have experi<strong>en</strong>ced the viol<strong>en</strong>ce ever and in the 12 months preceding the survey, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Cuts, bruises,or achesEye injuries,sprains,dislocations,or burnsDeep wounds,brok<strong>en</strong> bones,brok<strong>en</strong> teeth,or any otherserious injuryAny of theseinjuriesNumber ofever-marriedwom<strong>en</strong>Experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce 1Ever 2 28.9 14.7 9.9 33.3 1,603In the past 12 months 3 32.9 16.6 10.1 36.6 1,267Experi<strong>en</strong>ced sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce 4Ever 2 39.0 22.2 14.8 42.6 626In the past 12 months 3 39.1 22.7 15.0 43.1 551Experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce 4Ever 2 27.5 13.9 9.3 31.6 1,701In the past 12 months 3 30.8 15.3 9.3 34.3 1,374Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>thusband/partner for divorced, separated, or widowed wom<strong>en</strong>.1Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> who experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce only during pregnancy2Includes in the past 12 months3Excludes widows4Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> whose sexual initiation was forced but who have not experi<strong>en</strong>ced any other form of physicalor sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce16.9 VIOLENCE INITIATED BY WOMEN AGAINST HUSBANDSViol<strong>en</strong>ce by husbands against wives is not the only form of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce; wom<strong>en</strong> maysometimes be the perpetrators of viol<strong>en</strong>ce. In most cultures, however, the lev<strong>el</strong> of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ceinitiated by wives is only a fraction of the lev<strong>el</strong> of spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce initiated by husbands. To measurespousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce by wom<strong>en</strong> in the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>ya DHS, ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> were asked, ‘Have youever hit, slapped, kicked, or done anything <strong>el</strong>se to physically hurt your (last) husband/partner at timeswh<strong>en</strong> he was not already beating or physically hurting you?’ This line of questioning may result insome underreporting if wom<strong>en</strong> find it difficult to admit that they thems<strong>el</strong>ves initiated viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Table16.13 shows the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever initiated viol<strong>en</strong>ce against theircurr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband, and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of all ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> (excluding widows)who say that they have initiated spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce in the 12 months preceding the survey.Overall, 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> report that they have initiated physical viol<strong>en</strong>ceagainst their curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband, and 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t say they have committed such viol<strong>en</strong>ce inthe 12 months preceding the survey. Differ<strong>en</strong>tials in wom<strong>en</strong>’s initiating physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce against theircurr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>t husbands are g<strong>en</strong>erally small; however, there are a few exceptions. Wom<strong>en</strong>’sinitiation of viol<strong>en</strong>ce against their spouse is more common among wom<strong>en</strong> who have also experi<strong>en</strong>cedspousal physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce than among wom<strong>en</strong> who have not experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce (7 perc<strong>en</strong>tcompared with 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Regional disparities are appar<strong>en</strong>t, with Western and North Eastern260 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


provinces registering the highest proportions of m<strong>en</strong> experi<strong>en</strong>cing viol<strong>en</strong>ce at the hands of theirpartners. As m<strong>en</strong>tioned earlier, alcohol drinking corr<strong>el</strong>ates highly with viol<strong>en</strong>ce by m<strong>en</strong> against theirwives. As shown in Table 16.13, m<strong>en</strong> who are oft<strong>en</strong> drunk are also at increased risk of experi<strong>en</strong>cingviol<strong>en</strong>ce from their spouses.Table 16.13 Viol<strong>en</strong>ce by wom<strong>en</strong> against their spousePerc<strong>en</strong>tage of ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have committed physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce against their husband/partner wh<strong>en</strong> he was not already beating or physicallyhurting them ever and in the past 12 months, according to wom<strong>en</strong>’s own experi<strong>en</strong>ceof spousal viol<strong>en</strong>ce and their own and husband’s/partner’s characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09Wom<strong>en</strong>’s experi<strong>en</strong>ce of spousalviol<strong>en</strong>ce, wom<strong>en</strong>’s and theirhusband’s/partner’s characteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who have committedphysical viol<strong>en</strong>ce against their curr<strong>en</strong>tor most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partnerEverNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>In the past12 months 1 Number ofwom<strong>en</strong> 1Woman’s experi<strong>en</strong>ce of spousalphysical viol<strong>en</strong>ceEver 6.9 1,603 4.6 1,489In the last 12 months 7.5 1,267 5.8 1,196Not last 12 months/widow/missing 4.8 336 0.0 293Never 0.7 2,733 0.4 2,558Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 2.8 170 2.7 17020-24 2.2 811 2.1 79825-29 3.1 917 1.6 89330-39 3.0 1,450 2.3 1,35640-49 3.5 988 1.4 830Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 3.4 2,194 2.4 2,016Employed not for cash 2.3 767 2.0 709Not employed 2.7 1,373 1.1 1,319Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 2.0 252 1.5 2481-2 3.0 1,594 2.1 1,5203-4 2.3 1,373 1.1 1,2675+ 4.0 1,117 2.8 1,012Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 3.4 1,022 1.7 975Rural 2.8 3,314 2.0 3,072ProvinceNairobi 4.1 320 1.7 311C<strong>en</strong>tral 1.3 495 0.6 467Coast 1.9 365 1.5 348Eastern 3.3 702 1.4 675Nyanza 2.3 774 2.0 663Rift Valley 2.9 1,112 2.3 1,052Western 5.2 458 3.7 423North Eastern 5.2 110 2.1 108Wealth quintileLowest 4.6 784 3.3 723Second 1.6 793 0.3 720Middle 3.3 845 2.6 779Fourth 1.4 849 1.3 803Highest 3.8 1,064 2.1 1,022Continued…G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 261


Table 16.13—continuedWom<strong>en</strong>’s experi<strong>en</strong>ce of spousalviol<strong>en</strong>ce, wom<strong>en</strong>’s and theirhusband’s/partner’s characteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage who have committed physicalviol<strong>en</strong>ce against their curr<strong>en</strong>t or most rec<strong>en</strong>thusband/partnerEverNumber ofwom<strong>en</strong>In the past12 months 1 Number ofwom<strong>en</strong> 1Marital status and durationCurr<strong>en</strong>tly married woman 2.7 3,688 1.8 3,688Married only once 2.6 3,489 1.8 3,4890-4 years 1.9 830 1.3 8305-9 years 2.8 853 2.2 85310+ years 2.8 1,807 1.7 1,807Married more than once 4.0 199 2.6 199Divorced/separated/widowed 4.8 649 3.3 359EducationNo education 5.2 513 2.6 480Primary incomplete 3.3 1,364 2.7 1,252Primary complete 1.7 1,228 0.8 1,146Secondary+ 3.0 1,230 1.9 1,169Husband’s/partner’s educationNo education 5.5 414 3.2 371Primary incomplete 3.2 849 2.9 802Primary complete 2.6 3,069 1.5 2,870Husband’s/partner’s alcoholconsumptionDoes not drink alcohol 1.9 2,648 1.1 2,525Drinks alcohol but is never drunk * 9 * 7Is sometimes drunk 2.4 1,061 1.3 981Is oft<strong>en</strong> drunk 9.0 584 7.1 503Spousal age differ<strong>en</strong>ce 2Wife is older 1.5 83 1.3 83Wife is same age 3.9 88 1.8 88Wife is 1-4 years younger 3.2 1,118 1.7 1,118Wife is 5-9 years younger 2.7 1,443 2.1 1,443Wife is10+ years younger 2.2 932 1.5 932Spousal education differ<strong>en</strong>ceHusband has more education 2.3 2,083 1.5 1,942Wife has more education 3.8 984 2.8 910Both have equal education 2.9 942 1.6 904Neither has any education 6.2 260 3.8 241Total 3.0 4,336 1.9 4,047Note: Husband/partner refers to the curr<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for curr<strong>en</strong>tly marriedwom<strong>en</strong> and the most rec<strong>en</strong>t husband/partner for divorced, separated, or widowedwom<strong>en</strong>. Total includes 3 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information as to employm<strong>en</strong>t status, 4 withdon’t know/missing as to husband’s/partner’s education status, 30 missing informationon husband’s/partner’s alcohol consumption, 24 missing information on spousal agediffer<strong>en</strong>ce, and 50 missing information as to spousal education differ<strong>en</strong>ce. An asteriskd<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 unweighted cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.1Excludes widows2Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong>16.10 RESPONSE TO VIOLENCEAll respond<strong>en</strong>ts who experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by any person were asked aseries of questions about whether and from whom they sought h<strong>el</strong>p to try to <strong>en</strong>d the viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Table16.14 shows that 37 perc<strong>en</strong>t sought h<strong>el</strong>p to stop the viol<strong>en</strong>ce, 6 perc<strong>en</strong>t never sought h<strong>el</strong>p but toldsomeone about the viol<strong>en</strong>ce, and 45 perc<strong>en</strong>t never sought h<strong>el</strong>p and never told anyone about theviol<strong>en</strong>ce. Wom<strong>en</strong> who have experi<strong>en</strong>ced both physical and sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to seekh<strong>el</strong>p than those who experi<strong>en</strong>ced only one or the other.Differ<strong>en</strong>ces by background characteristics in h<strong>el</strong>p-seeking behaviour are not large. Olderwom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>y than younger wom<strong>en</strong> to have sought h<strong>el</strong>p to stop the viol<strong>en</strong>ce. Wom<strong>en</strong> whoare divorced, separated, or widowed and have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce are mor<strong>el</strong>ik<strong>el</strong>y than curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> to seek h<strong>el</strong>p. Wom<strong>en</strong> in Nyanza and Rift Valley provinces whohave ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ce are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to seek h<strong>el</strong>p to stop the viol<strong>en</strong>ce.262 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.14 H<strong>el</strong>p seeking to stop viol<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce bywhether they have sought h<strong>el</strong>p to stop the viol<strong>en</strong>ce and if not, whether they told anyone about theviol<strong>en</strong>ce, according to type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce and background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce andbackground characteristicSought h<strong>el</strong>pto stopviol<strong>en</strong>ceNeversought h<strong>el</strong>p,but toldsomeoneNeversought h<strong>el</strong>p,never toldanyoneMissing/don’t knowTotalNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>Type of viol<strong>en</strong>cePhysical only 35.2 5.4 52.4 7.0 100.0 1,548Sexual only 13.6 6.2 26.4 53.8 100.0 415Both physical and sexual 51.7 6.5 40.9 0.9 100.0 887Curr<strong>en</strong>t age15-19 26.1 9.1 49.0 15.8 100.0 45320-24 30.3 6.0 52.1 11.5 100.0 53925-29 39.0 3.9 42.4 14.7 100.0 54130-39 43.5 5.1 42.3 9.1 100.0 77240-49 42.3 6.3 41.4 10.1 100.0 545Employed last 12 monthsEmployed for cash 40.3 6.4 41.1 12.2 100.0 1,429Employed not for cash 38.9 2.9 49.1 9.0 100.0 471Not employed 31.5 6.7 49.1 12.8 100.0 950Number of living childr<strong>en</strong>0 26.6 8.2 48.0 17.2 100.0 6181-2 37.2 5.7 46.6 10.5 100.0 8513-4 45.4 5.3 41.3 8.0 100.0 7215+ 38.0 4.5 44.5 12.9 100.0 659Marital status and durationNever married 25.8 8.8 44.6 20.8 100.0 610Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married woman 36.5 5.0 48.1 10.3 100.0 1,795Married only once 36.6 5.0 48.3 10.1 100.0 1,6840-4 years 25.9 5.1 52.7 16.3 100.0 3435-9 years 35.1 4.5 54.2 6.1 100.0 40610+ years 41.2 5.1 44.2 9.5 100.0 936Married more than once 34.8 5.7 45.4 14.1 100.0 110Divorced/separated/widowed 55.2 5.4 33.4 6.0 100.0 445Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 35.3 7.5 39.5 17.8 100.0 667Rural 37.7 5.4 46.8 10.1 100.0 2,183ProvinceNairobi 29.1 15.2 41.6 14.1 100.0 195C<strong>en</strong>tral 36.4 5.9 47.0 10.7 100.0 280Coast 32.7 7.4 36.4 23.6 100.0 197Eastern 34.0 7.2 46.4 12.4 100.0 410Nyanza 41.4 4.6 45.5 8.6 100.0 663Rift Valley 40.3 3.4 44.7 11.6 100.0 706Western 35.2 5.5 48.2 11.1 100.0 352North Eastern 29.8 8.2 49.4 12.6 100.0 46EducationNo education 31.2 3.3 52.7 12.8 100.0 288Primary incomplete 39.5 5.4 45.2 9.9 100.0 1,002Primary complete 36.6 3.6 46.3 13.6 100.0 749Secondary+ 36.9 9.5 41.1 12.4 100.0 812Wealth quintileLowest 38.2 2.9 46.6 12.3 100.0 495Second 36.7 5.2 48.0 10.2 100.0 573Middle 42.8 5.5 42.1 9.6 100.0 557Fourth 33.8 5.2 48.6 12.4 100.0 550Highest 34.9 9.5 41.0 14.5 100.0 674Total 37.2 5.9 45.1 11.9 100.0 2,850Note: Excludes wom<strong>en</strong> whose sexual initiation was forced but who have not experi<strong>en</strong>ced any other formof physical or sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ceG<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 263


Table 16.15 shows the sources of h<strong>el</strong>p among wom<strong>en</strong> who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced viol<strong>en</strong>ceand have sought h<strong>el</strong>p. Among all those who sought h<strong>el</strong>p, wom<strong>en</strong> are most lik<strong>el</strong>y to have sought h<strong>el</strong>pfrom their own family (63 perc<strong>en</strong>t). In-laws are also an important source of h<strong>el</strong>p, sought out by 34perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>. Fourte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> sought h<strong>el</strong>p from fri<strong>en</strong>ds or neighbours.Table 16.15 Sources from where h<strong>el</strong>p was soughtAmong wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who have ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced physical or sexualviol<strong>en</strong>ce and who sought h<strong>el</strong>p, the perc<strong>en</strong>tage who sought h<strong>el</strong>p from specificsources, according to type of viol<strong>en</strong>ce experi<strong>en</strong>ced, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Perc<strong>en</strong>tage whosought h<strong>el</strong>p from:PhysicalonlyType of viol<strong>en</strong>ceSexualonlyBothphysicaland sexualTotalOwn family 63.3 53.5 63.5 62.9In-laws 32.1 6.1 40.4 34.3Husband/partner boyfri<strong>en</strong>d 0.2 6.9 0.8 0.8Fri<strong>en</strong>d/neighbor 11.8 14.4 16.9 14.2R<strong>el</strong>igious leader 1.5 1.9 4.3 2.7Doctor/medical personn<strong>el</strong> 2.1 1.1 2.0 2.0Police 5.6 0.0 8.3 6.4Lawyer 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2Social service organization 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1Community leader/localadministration 5.1 27.0 14.3 10.2Other 6.2 0.7 2.1 4.1Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 544 56 458 1,05916.11 FEMALE GENITAL CUTTINGFemale g<strong>en</strong>ital cutting or circumcision is wid<strong>el</strong>y practised in many K<strong>en</strong>yan communities. Itinvolves partial or total removal of the external female g<strong>en</strong>italia or other injury to the female organsfor cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons. The practice is wid<strong>el</strong>y condemned as harmful, because itposes a pot<strong>en</strong>tially great risk to the health and w<strong>el</strong>l-being of the wom<strong>en</strong> and girls who are subjected toit. It is also g<strong>en</strong>erally recognised as a violation of childr<strong>en</strong>’s rights. In the 2008-09 KDHS, wom<strong>en</strong>were asked whether they were circumcised and if so, how severe the circumcision was, how old theywere at the time, and whether they fe<strong>el</strong> the practice should continue or not.Table 16.16 shows that 96 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> have heard of female circumcision and 27perc<strong>en</strong>t are circumcised. The latter repres<strong>en</strong>ts a decline from the lev<strong>el</strong> of 38 perc<strong>en</strong>t reported in the1998 KDHS and 32 perc<strong>en</strong>t reported in the 2003 KDHS. The vast majority of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> saythat they had some flesh removed—which includes removal of the clitoris—while 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t say theywere nicked with no flesh removed. Thirte<strong>en</strong> perc<strong>en</strong>t of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> say they had the mostinvasive form of the operation in which the labia are removed and sewn closed.The proportion of wom<strong>en</strong> circumcised increases with age, from 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 to 49 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those age 45-49. A higher proportion of rural wom<strong>en</strong> (31 perc<strong>en</strong>t) than urbanwom<strong>en</strong> (17 perc<strong>en</strong>t) have be<strong>en</strong> circumcised. The practice varies trem<strong>en</strong>dously by province. Theproportion of wom<strong>en</strong> circumcised ranges from 1 perc<strong>en</strong>t in Western province to 98 perc<strong>en</strong>t in NorthEastern province. Roughly one-third of wom<strong>en</strong> in Eastern, Nyanza, and Rift Valley provinces havebe<strong>en</strong> circumcised compared with over one-quarter of those in C<strong>en</strong>tral province, 14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those inNairobi, and 10 perc<strong>en</strong>t of those in Coast province. The most severe form of circumcisionpredominates in North Eastern province.There is a strong r<strong>el</strong>ationship betwe<strong>en</strong> education lev<strong>el</strong> and circumcision status. Fifty-fourperc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> with no education report that they are circumcised compared with only 19 perc<strong>en</strong>tof those with at least some secondary education. The proportion of Muslim wom<strong>en</strong> who arecircumcised is about double that of Christian wom<strong>en</strong>. With regard to ethnicity, female g<strong>en</strong>ital cuttingis far more preval<strong>en</strong>t among the Somali (98 perc<strong>en</strong>t), the Kisii (96 perc<strong>en</strong>t), and the Maasai (73perc<strong>en</strong>t) than among other groups. It is least common among Luo and Luhya wom<strong>en</strong>. The perc<strong>en</strong>tageof wom<strong>en</strong> circumcised declines steadily as wealth quintile increases.264 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Table 16.16 Knowledge and preval<strong>en</strong>ce of female circumcisionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who have heard of female circumcision, perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> circumcised, and the perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of circumcisedwom<strong>en</strong> by type of circumcision, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tage ofwom<strong>en</strong> whohave heard of Perc<strong>en</strong>tage offemale wom<strong>en</strong>circumcision circumcisedNumberof wom<strong>en</strong>FleshremovedType of circumcisionNicked, nofleshremovedSewnclosedNotdeterminedTotalNumber ofcircumcisedwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 93.3 14.6 1,761 76.5 4.5 17.6 1.3 100.0 25720-24 96.2 21.1 1,715 82.0 3.3 13.1 1.6 100.0 36125-29 97.1 25.3 1,454 80.9 2.1 16.2 0.8 100.0 36830-34 96.9 30.0 1,209 83.5 2.2 12.2 2.2 100.0 36335-39 96.8 35.1 877 86.7 0.9 11.4 1.0 100.0 30840-44 97.4 39.8 768 83.3 2.1 11.7 2.9 100.0 30545-49 96.9 48.8 661 85.3 1.1 12.0 1.6 100.0 322Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 97.5 16.5 2,148 69.4 7.3 19.6 3.6 100.0 355Rural 95.6 30.6 6,296 85.1 1.3 12.2 1.3 100.0 1,929ProvinceNairobi 98.3 13.8 728 70.8 17.1 12.0 0.1 100.0 101C<strong>en</strong>tral 98.7 26.5 905 75.6 2.0 17.2 5.2 100.0 240Coast 85.2 10.0 674 49.4 2.4 34.9 13.3 100.0 67Eastern 98.5 35.8 1,376 88.6 0.9 8.5 2.0 100.0 493Nyanza 93.2 33.8 1,389 98.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 100.0 470Rift Valley 97.8 32.1 2,262 93.1 2.3 3.9 0.6 100.0 727Western 95.3 0.8 927 * * * * 100.0 7North Eastern 99.9 97.5 184 14.2 2.8 82.5 0.5 100.0 180EducationNo education 87.5 53.7 752 58.4 1.0 40.1 0.6 100.0 404Primary incomplete 94.4 28.8 2,526 87.1 3.0 7.7 2.2 100.0 727Primary complete 97.3 26.4 2,272 87.8 2.6 8.5 1.1 100.0 601Secondary+ 98.8 19.1 2,894 89.2 1.9 6.6 2.2 100.0 553Work statusWorking for cash 96.8 24.3 3,618 85.5 2.7 9.8 2.0 100.0 880Not working for cash 95.5 29.1 4,826 81.0 2.0 15.6 1.4 100.0 1,404R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 95.8 29.1 1,852 89.5 2.0 7.4 1.1 100.0 540Protestant/otherChristian 96.9 23.5 5,748 91.1 2.3 4.8 1.9 100.0 1,349Muslim 93.9 51.4 626 33.8 3.1 61.1 2.0 100.0 322No r<strong>el</strong>igion 80.9 38.3 185 93.3 0.8 5.8 0.0 100.0 71EthnicityEmbu 99.6 51.4 120 86.5 2.8 8.4 2.3 100.0 61Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 99.9 40.4 1,115 92.6 2.5 4.4 0.5 100.0 450Kamba 97.8 22.9 923 91.1 1.0 5.7 2.1 100.0 211Kikuyu 99.4 21.4 1,642 80.7 5.0 11.3 3.0 100.0 352Kisii 100.0 96.1 579 97.0 1.1 1.4 0.5 100.0 556Luhya 95.6 0.2 1,373 * * * * 100.0 3Luo 90.9 0.1 1,098 * * * * 100.0 1Maasai 100.0 73.2 113 95.5 2.0 2.4 0.0 100.0 83Meru 99.4 39.7 415 97.7 0.0 2.2 0.1 100.0 165Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 77.9 4.4 430 * * * * 100.0 19Somali 99.6 97.6 240 21.1 3.4 75.1 0.4 100.0 234Taita/Taveta 99.5 32.2 79 44.2 0.0 19.4 36.4 100.0 25Other 86.7 38.9 315 76.0 2.7 17.4 3.9 100.0 123Wealth quintileLowest 90.2 40.2 1,393 72.6 2.1 25.0 0.2 100.0 560Second 96.4 31.0 1,483 91.6 1.1 6.2 1.1 100.0 460Middle 97.3 29.4 1,613 88.0 1.3 8.4 2.4 100.0 474Fourth 96.9 25.9 1,736 88.2 1.9 7.4 2.6 100.0 449Highest 97.9 15.4 2,220 72.8 6.1 18.7 2.5 100.0 341Total 96.1 27.1 8,444 82.7 2.3 13.4 1.6 100.0 2,284Note: an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 cases that has be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 265


Table 16.17 shows data on the age at which wom<strong>en</strong> were circumcised. It is important torealise that many wom<strong>en</strong> were circumcised at a very young age and cannot recall how old they wereat the time. Thus the data should be viewed as providing a rough idea of age at circumcision. Resultsshow a broad range of age at circumcision. One-third of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> say they were 14-18years old at the time of the operation, 19 perc<strong>en</strong>t were 12-13 years old, and 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t were 10-11years old. Tw<strong>el</strong>ve perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> were circumcised at 8-9 years of age, and an equal proportionwas circumcised at 3-7 years of age. Only 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> were circumcised before 3 years ofage.Table 16.17 Age at circumcisionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> by age at circumcision, according to background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Backgroundcharacteristic< 3years3-7years8-9yearsAge at circumcision10-11years12-13years14-18years19-26yearsMissing/don’tknowTotalNumber ofcircumcisedwom<strong>en</strong>Age15-19 0.7 25.9 18.0 22.8 11.8 16.8 na 3.9 100.0 25720-24 0.4 15.4 16.6 15.5 17.1 27.5 3.9 3.5 100.0 36125-29 1.1 15.6 17.1 16.9 14.4 29.4 3.8 1.7 100.0 36830-34 3.9 10.2 10.2 12.6 20.8 35.1 4.3 2.9 100.0 36335-39 2.1 9.6 7.3 15.5 20.9 37.3 4.8 2.6 100.0 30840-44 2.3 4.9 5.6 10.7 27.2 43.7 2.1 3.4 100.0 30545-49 1.1 5.5 7.8 14.4 18.0 41.1 4.8 7.3 100.0 322Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 3.8 21.9 19.6 14.2 19.7 17.3 0.5 3.0 100.0 355Rural 1.3 10.5 10.4 15.5 18.4 36.1 4.1 3.7 100.0 1,929ProvinceNairobi 2.3 18.5 15.0 23.5 12.7 23.7 1.1 3.1 100.0 101C<strong>en</strong>tral 0.7 0.4 0.6 8.3 28.1 57.3 2.0 2.7 100.0 240Coast 29.2 17.9 23.9 6.2 5.6 9.3 0.6 7.4 100.0 67Eastern 2.4 7.1 11.5 16.4 25.0 29.6 2.0 6.1 100.0 493Nyanza 0.4 12.0 22.6 38.3 19.4 3.1 0.1 4.1 100.0 470Rift Valley 0.2 5.5 5.1 4.3 16.5 58.9 8.8 0.7 100.0 727Western * * * * * * * * 100.0 7North Eastern 0.0 64.4 20.8 5.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 7.0 100.0 180EducationNo education 1.1 26.9 15.3 10.7 14.5 24.2 1.2 6.3 100.0 404Primary incomplete 1.4 7.2 8.1 14.9 22.2 39.1 2.9 4.0 100.0 727Primary complete 2.1 6.9 9.9 12.9 15.4 45.5 4.8 2.4 100.0 601Secondary+ 2.1 13.9 16.4 21.7 20.4 18.7 4.6 2.2 100.0 553Work statusWorking for cash 1.2 5.8 8.0 11.9 23.5 44.0 3.3 2.3 100.0 880Not working for cash 2.0 16.3 14.3 17.4 15.6 26.4 3.7 4.3 100.0 1,404Wealth quintileLowest 0.8 20.0 11.8 11.9 13.7 34.3 2.7 4.9 100.0 560Second 1.1 7.3 13.1 18.2 18.3 34.1 5.3 2.5 100.0 460Middle 1.4 7.6 7.9 19.0 19.4 35.2 5.1 4.4 100.0 474Fourth 2.2 8.2 9.6 13.2 21.5 39.3 3.3 2.7 100.0 449Highest 3.8 17.9 18.7 14.5 22.4 19.5 0.5 2.8 100.0 341Total 1.7 12.2 11.9 15.3 18.6 33.2 3.5 3.6 100.0 2,284Note: an asterisk d<strong>en</strong>otes a figure based on fewer than 25 cases that have be<strong>en</strong> suppressed.na = Not applicableThere appears to be a tr<strong>en</strong>d to circumcise girls at younger ages. For example, 45 perc<strong>en</strong>t ofcircumcised wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-19 were circumcised before they were t<strong>en</strong> years old compared with only14 perc<strong>en</strong>t of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> age 45-49. Circumcision of urban wom<strong>en</strong> g<strong>en</strong>erally occurs atyounger ages than for rural wom<strong>en</strong>. Coast province has by far the highest proportion of femalecircumcision performed during infancy. Almost two-thirds of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> in North Easternprovince underw<strong>en</strong>t the procedure wh<strong>en</strong> they were 3-7 years old. Almost 6 in 10 circumcised wom<strong>en</strong>in Rift Valley and C<strong>en</strong>tral provinces were circumcised wh<strong>en</strong> they were 14-18 years old.266 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


Circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> with no educationand those with at least some secondaryschooling t<strong>en</strong>d to have received the operationat younger ages than wom<strong>en</strong> with eitherprimary incomplete or primary complete education.Similarly, circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> in th<strong>el</strong>ower and upper wealth quintiles werecircumcised at younger ages than those in themiddle quintiles.Table 16.18 shows information aboutthe type of person who performed wom<strong>en</strong>’scircumcisions. In interpreting the data, it isimportant to remember that wom<strong>en</strong> who werecircumcised at a young age are lik<strong>el</strong>y not toTable 16.18 Person performing circumcisions among wom<strong>en</strong> byresid<strong>en</strong>cePerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> by person performingthe circumcision, according to resid<strong>en</strong>ce, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Person performingcircumcisionResid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban Ruralknow who performed their procedure. However, since most wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya were circumcised at age10 and older, reporting of the type of person is lik<strong>el</strong>y to be fairly accurate. The results indicate that thevast majority of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> had the operation performed by a traditional practitioner (78perc<strong>en</strong>t), and only 20 perc<strong>en</strong>t were circumcised by health professionals. Urban wom<strong>en</strong> are more lik<strong>el</strong>ythan rural wom<strong>en</strong> to have the procedure performed by a health professional.Information about the perceived b<strong>en</strong>efits of female circumcision is giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 16.19. Fourin five wom<strong>en</strong> do not see any b<strong>en</strong>efit to female circumcision. This figure is surprisingly high amongwom<strong>en</strong> who have be<strong>en</strong> circumcised (59 perc<strong>en</strong>t). One-quarter of circumcised wom<strong>en</strong> cite socialacceptance as a b<strong>en</strong>efit of the practice, while one in six say that it is b<strong>en</strong>eficial in preserving virginityor prev<strong>en</strong>ting premarital sex.TotalTraditional 70.7 79.9 78.4Traditional circumciser 66.3 76.2 74.7Traditional birth att<strong>en</strong>dant 3.3 3.4 3.4Other traditional 1.1 0.2 0.3Health professional 27.8 18.2 19.7Doctor 11.2 4.8 5.8Trained nurse/midwife 16.1 13.2 13.6Other health professional 0.6 0.3 0.3Don’t know/missing 1.5 1.9 1.9Total perc<strong>en</strong>t 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 355 1,929 2,284Table 16.19 B<strong>en</strong>efits of circumcisionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> who cite specific b<strong>en</strong>efits that girls get ifthey are circumcised according to circumcision status, K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09B<strong>en</strong>efit of circumcisionCircumcision statusCircumcisedwom<strong>en</strong>Uncircumcisedwom<strong>en</strong>TotalNo b<strong>en</strong>efits 58.6 89.1 80.9Cleanliness/hygi<strong>en</strong>e 6.9 0.8 2.5Social acceptance 23.7 1.9 7.8Better marriage prospects 8.7 0.8 2.9Preserve virginity/prev<strong>en</strong>tpremarital sex 15.6 1.5 5.3More sexual pleasure forthe man 2.4 0.4 1.0R<strong>el</strong>igious approval 5.3 0.3 1.7Reduce promiscuity/reducesex drive 3.7 0.3 1.2Reduce STD and HIV/AIDSinfections 0.1 0.6 0.5Other 31.8 18.9 50.7Total 2,284 6,160 8,444Table 16.20 shows information about wom<strong>en</strong>’s attitudes towards the practice of femaleg<strong>en</strong>ital cutting. Only 7 perc<strong>en</strong>t of all wom<strong>en</strong> say that they fe<strong>el</strong> that female circumcision is required bytheir r<strong>el</strong>igion, though the proportion rises to 87 perc<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province. Morethan 4 in 5 wom<strong>en</strong> b<strong>el</strong>ieve that female circumcision should be stopped (82 perc<strong>en</strong>t); only 9 perc<strong>en</strong>tfe<strong>el</strong> it should continue, and 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t are unsure. Wom<strong>en</strong> in North Eastern province are by far themost supportive of female circumcision, with 90 perc<strong>en</strong>t saying that it should continue. Circumcisedwom<strong>en</strong> are also far more lik<strong>el</strong>y than uncircumcised wom<strong>en</strong> to say that the practice is required by theirr<strong>el</strong>igion and that it should continue.G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce | 267


Table 16.20 Attitudes about female circumcisionPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 who b<strong>el</strong>ieve female circumcision is required by their r<strong>el</strong>igion and perc<strong>en</strong>tdistribution of wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by whether they b<strong>el</strong>ieve the practice should continue or be stopped, according tos<strong>el</strong>ected background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09BackgroundcharacteristicPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewho b<strong>el</strong>ievecircumcision isrequired bytheir r<strong>el</strong>igionPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution by whether practiceshould be continued or stoppedContinue Be stopped Not sure MissingTotalNumberAge15-19 7.4 8.8 80.0 4.3 7.0 100.0 1,76120-24 7.9 9.9 82.7 3.4 4.1 100.0 1,71525-29 7.2 9.9 82.7 4.1 3.3 100.0 1,45430-34 6.4 8.4 85.0 3.4 3.2 100.0 1,20935-39 7.5 9.8 82.0 4.7 3.5 100.0 87740-44 7.3 9.6 82.7 4.8 2.8 100.0 76845-49 7.9 10.0 81.3 5.7 3.1 100.0 661Resid<strong>en</strong>ceUrban 6.8 7.6 85.9 3.6 2.8 100.0 2,148Rural 7.5 10.0 81.0 4.3 4.6 100.0 6,296ProvinceNairobi 4.3 5.7 88.5 4.1 1.7 100.0 728C<strong>en</strong>tral 3.6 5.2 91.8 1.6 1.4 100.0 905Coast 5.8 4.0 75.1 5.8 15.2 100.0 674Eastern 5.0 9.0 87.8 1.7 1.5 100.0 1,376Nyanza 13.5 16.7 66.4 9.5 7.4 100.0 1,389Rift Valley 4.1 6.4 87.7 3.5 2.3 100.0 2,262Western 0.8 1.6 90.5 2.9 5.0 100.0 927North Eastern 86.5 89.8 7.3 2.3 0.6 100.0 184EducationNo education 26.6 33.9 47.6 6.0 12.5 100.0 752Primary incomplete 6.3 8.1 79.8 6.2 5.8 100.0 2,526Primary complete 4.5 6.7 86.8 3.4 3.2 100.0 2,272Secondary+ 5.5 6.3 89.9 2.4 1.3 100.0 2,894Work statusWorking for cash 4.7 6.4 86.4 3.8 3.4 100.0 3,618Not working for cash 9.3 11.7 79.2 4.3 4.8 100.0 4,826Circumcision statusCircumcised wom<strong>en</strong> 23.3 28.9 67.5 3.5 0.1 100.0 2,284Uncircumcised wom<strong>en</strong> 1.4 2.2 87.8 4.4 5.7 100.0 6,160Wealth quintileLowest 14.1 17.6 67.0 5.5 9.9 100.0 1,393Second 7.3 9.4 82.0 4.4 4.1 100.0 1,483Middle 5.9 9.3 83.5 4.5 2.8 100.0 1,613Fourth 6.7 6.6 86.3 3.9 3.3 100.0 1,736Highest 4.7 6.6 88.0 3.0 2.3 100.0 2,220Total 7.3 9.4 82.3 4.1 4.2 100.0 8,444268 | G<strong>en</strong>der-Based Viol<strong>en</strong>ce


ADULT AND MATERNAL MORTALITY 17Christopher Omolo and Paul KizitoMortality lev<strong>el</strong>s and tr<strong>en</strong>ds provide good measures of the health status of a population, Theyalso serve as indicators of national dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. Studies have shown that mortality declines aseconomic performance improves. Compared with measures of infant and child mortality, measures ofadult mortality in K<strong>en</strong>ya are scarce. There are several reasons. First, while childhood mortality can beestimated through the birth history approach, the equival<strong>en</strong>t approach for measurem<strong>en</strong>t of adultmortality is compromised by recall problems. Second, death rates are much lower in adulthood than inchildhood, and h<strong>en</strong>ce estimates for particular age groups can be distorted by sampling errors. Third,there is usually very limited information available about the characteristics of those who have died inadulthood. Although the same can be said about data on the characteristics of those who have died inchildhood, it is reasonable to expect the characteristics of the par<strong>en</strong>ts to influ<strong>en</strong>ce directly thechildr<strong>en</strong>’s chances of survival.17.1 DATACollecting information on the survival of siblings (i.e., biological brothers and sisters) is auseful method for collecting information on adult mortality. To estimate adult mortality, the 2008KDHS included a sibling history in the wom<strong>en</strong>’s questionnaire. A series of questions were askedabout all the respond<strong>en</strong>t’s brothers and sisters and their survival status.Specifically, each female respond<strong>en</strong>t was asked to report all childr<strong>en</strong> born to her biologicalmother, including hers<strong>el</strong>f. She was asked to include in her list all siblings who were still alive as w<strong>el</strong>las those who had died. For brothers and sisters who were still alive, only the age of the sibling wasasked. For those who had died before reaching age 12, only the number of years since death and ageat death were asked. For those who had died at age 12 years or older, three questions were asked,specifically to determine if the death was maternity-r<strong>el</strong>ated: (1) ‘Was [NAME OF SISTER] pregnantwh<strong>en</strong> she died?’ (2) (If the answer was positive), ‘Did she die during childbirth?’ and (3) (if theresponse was negative) ‘Did she die within two months of the <strong>en</strong>d of a pregnancy or childbirth?’These data allow direct estimation of overall adult mortality (by age and sex) as w<strong>el</strong>l as maternalmortality.Adult and maternal mortality estimation by either direct or indirect methods requires accuratereporting of the number of siblings the respond<strong>en</strong>t had, both the number who died and the numberwho died during pregnancy, child birth, or in the two months after pregnancy <strong>en</strong>ded (for maternalmortality). Although there is no definitive procedure for establishing the complet<strong>en</strong>ess ofretrospective data on sibling survivorship, Table 17.1 pres<strong>en</strong>ts several indicators that can be used toassess the quality of sibling survivorship data.The data do not show any obvious defects that would indicate poor data quality or significantunderreporting. A total of 49,595 siblings were recorded in the maternal mortality section of the 2008KDHS questionnaires. The sex ratio of the <strong>en</strong>umerated siblings (the ratio of brothers to sisters) is99.8, which is lower than the expected value. The survival status for only 42 (one-t<strong>en</strong>th of oneperc<strong>en</strong>t) of the siblings was not reported. For only 79 (less than one perc<strong>en</strong>t) of the surviving siblings,their curr<strong>en</strong>t age was not reported. Among deceased siblings, both the age at death (AD) and yearssince death (YSD) were missing for less than 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Indicators of data quality for the 2008-09KDHS show some improvem<strong>en</strong>t compared with the 2003 KDHS, except for the sex ratio that appearsunusually low. Rather than exclude the siblings with missing data from further analysis, informationon the birth order of siblings in conjunction with other information was used to impute the missingAdult and Maternal Mortality | 269


data 1 . The sibling survivorship data, including cases with imputed values, have be<strong>en</strong> used in the directestimation of adult and maternal mortality.Table 17.1 Data on siblingsNumber of siblings reported by wom<strong>en</strong> respond<strong>en</strong>ts and complet<strong>en</strong>ess of the reported data on age, age at death(AD), and years since death (YSD), according to survival status and sex of the sibling, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Females Males AllNumber Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Number Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Number Perc<strong>en</strong>tageAll siblings reported 24,825 100.0 24,770 100.0 49,595 100.0Surviving 21,946 88.4 21,740 87.8 43,686 88.1Deceased 2,849 11.5 3,018 12.2 5,866 11.8Missing information 30 0.1 12 0.0 42 0.1Surviving siblings 21,946 100.0 21,740 100.0 43,686 100.0Age reported 21,908 99.8 21,700 99.8 43,608 99.8Age missing 38 0.2 40 0.2 79 0.2Deceased siblings 2,849 100.0 3,018 100.0 5,866 100.0AD and YSD reported 2,753 96.6 2,920 96.8 5,673 96.7Missing only AD 32 1.1 40 1.3 72 1.2Missing only YSD 17 0.6 14 0.5 31 0.5Missing both 47 1.7 43 1.4 91 1.517.2 ESTIMATES OF ADULT MORTALITYOne way to assess the quality of data used to estimate maternal mortality is to evaluate theplausibility and stability of overall adult mortality. It is reasoned that if rates of overall adult mortalityare implausible, rates based on a subset on deaths—i.e., maternal mortality in particular—are unlik<strong>el</strong>yto be free of serious problems. Also, lev<strong>el</strong>s and tr<strong>en</strong>ds in overall adult mortality have importantimplications in their own right for health and social programs in K<strong>en</strong>ya, especially with regard to thepot<strong>en</strong>tial impact of the AIDS epidemic.The direct estimation of adult mortality uses the reported ages at death and years since deathof respond<strong>en</strong>ts’ brothers and sisters. Because of the differ<strong>en</strong>tials in exposure to the risk of dying, ageandsex-specific death rates are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in this report. The results are also compared with ratesobtained from the 2003 KDHS rates. Because the number of deaths on which the KDHS rates arebased is not very large (677 female deaths and 675 male deaths from the 2008-09 KDHS), theestimated age-specific rates are subject to considerable sampling variation.Table 17.2 pres<strong>en</strong>ts age-specific mortality rates for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 for the sixyearperiod preceding the survey. The rates are stable, showing expected increases for both sexes astheir age increases. The rise is steeper for wom<strong>en</strong> at younger ages and steeper for m<strong>en</strong> at older ages.The overall mortality rates are lower among wom<strong>en</strong> than m<strong>en</strong> (5.8 and 6.0 deaths per 1,000 years ofexposure, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y). There is considerable overlap of male and female age-specific mortality rates.At ages 20-29 and 35-39, female mortality exceeds male mortality, with a wider differ<strong>en</strong>ce at agegroup 25-29, while the rates are nearly the same at age group 30-34. Above age 40, male mortalityexceeds female mortality by wider margins as age advances.1 The imputation procedure is based on the assumption that the reported birth order of siblings in the history iscorrect. The first step is to calculate birth dates. For each living sibling with a reported age and each dead siblingwith complete information on both age at death and years since death, the birth date was calculated. For a siblingmissing these data, a birth date was imputed within the range defined by the birth dates of the bracketingsiblings. In the case of living siblings, an age at the time of the survey was th<strong>en</strong> calculated from the imputedbirth date. In the case of dead siblings, if either the age at death or years since death was reported, that informationwas combined with the birth date to produce the missing information. If both pieces of information weremissing, the distribution of the ages at death for siblings for whom the years since death was unreported, but ageat death was reported, was used as a basis for imputing the age at death.270 | Adult and Maternal Mortality


Table 17.2 Adult mortality ratesAge-specific mortality rates for wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>age 15-49 based on the survivorship of sisters andbrothers of wom<strong>en</strong> respond<strong>en</strong>ts for the period0-6 years prior to the survey, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age Deaths ExposureMortalityratesWOMEN15-19 35 21,051 1.720-24 82 24,580 3.325-29 134 22,762 5.930-34 134 19,218 7.035-39 131 14,593 9.040-44 105 9,444 11.145-49 56 5,478 10.315-49 677 117,126 5.8 aMEN15-19 52 20,943 2.520-24 76 24,702 3.125-29 95 22,915 4.130-34 136 19,030 7.235-39 118 14,090 8.440-44 114 9,298 12.345-49 84 5,627 14.915-49 675 116,604 6.0 aaAge standardisedA comparison of the rates from the 2008-09 KDHS and the 2003 KDHS indicates a decline inadult mortality for both wom<strong>en</strong> and m<strong>en</strong>, but the patterns differ slightly (Figure 17.1). Female adultmortality rates from the 2008-09 data are lower for all ages, except from age 35 upward, where therates are nearly the same as those from the 2003 survey. Male adult mortality is lower for most of theage groups, except age groups 15-19 and 45-49. The summary measure of mortality for age group 15-49 shows a decrease of about 12 perc<strong>en</strong>t in female mortality but only a 3 perc<strong>en</strong>t decrease in malemortality rates from the 2003 KDHS rates.Adult and Maternal Mortality | 271


Figure 17.1 Tr<strong>en</strong>ds in Adult Mortality, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1996-2002and 2002-200815Deaths per 1,00010Females+ + ,+ ,+ ,5+,+,+,,015-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Age in Years1510Deaths per 1,000Males+,+,+,,+5,++,+,015-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49Age in Years+ 2003 KDHS (1996-2002) , 2008-09 KDHS (2002-2008)Note: Data refer to the sev<strong>en</strong>-year period preceding the survey.17.3 ESTIMATES OF MATERNAL MORTALITYTwo procedures using sisterhood data (sibling history data) are g<strong>en</strong>erally used to estimatematernal mortality in dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries; these employ an indirect variant (Graham et al, 1989) anda direct estimation method (Rut<strong>en</strong>berg et al., 1991). In this report, the direct estimation procedure isapplied. Age-specific mortality rates are calculated by dividing the number of maternal deaths bywoman-years of exposure. To remove the effect of truncation bias (the upper boundary for <strong>el</strong>igibilityfor wom<strong>en</strong> interviewed in the KDHS is 50 years), the overall rate for wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 isstandardized by the age distribution of the survey respond<strong>en</strong>ts. Maternal deaths are defined as anydeaths that occurred during pregnancy or childbirth or that occurred within two months of the birth or272 | Adult and Maternal Mortality


termination of a pregnancy 2 . Estimates of maternal mortality are therefore based sol<strong>el</strong>y on the timingof the death in r<strong>el</strong>ationship to the pregnancy.Table 17.3 pres<strong>en</strong>ts direct estimates of maternal mortality for the t<strong>en</strong>-year period prior to thesurvey. The data indicate that the rate of mortality associated with pregnancy and childbearing is 0.8maternal deaths per 1,000 woman-years of exposure. Although the estimated age-specific mortalityrates display a g<strong>en</strong>erally plausible pattern, the risk of maternal death is higher at older ages; it is apattern that differs from that observed with the 2003 KDHS data. Maternal deaths repres<strong>en</strong>t about 15perc<strong>en</strong>t of all deaths to wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 (data not shown).The maternal mortality rate can beconverted to a maternal mortality ratio andexpressed per 100,000 live births by dividingthe rate by the g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate of 0.161,which prevailed during the same 10-year timeperiod. Using this procedure, the maternalmortality ratio (MMR) during the 10-yearperiod before the survey is estimated as 488maternal deaths per 100,000 live births.Although the maternal mortality ratio appearsto be higher than the lev<strong>el</strong> of 414 from the2003 KDHS, the 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t confid<strong>en</strong>ceintervals range from 328 to 501 for the 2003figure and from 333 to 643 for the 2008-09figure. The methodology used and the samplesize implem<strong>en</strong>ted in these two surveys do notallow for precise estimates of maternalmortality. The sampling errors around each ofTable 17.3 Maternal mortalityMaternal mortality rates for the t<strong>en</strong>-year period prior to the survey,based on the survivorship of sisters of wom<strong>en</strong> respond<strong>en</strong>ts,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09the estimates are large and overlap considerably. Consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, the two estimates are not significantlydiffer<strong>en</strong>t. This implies that it is impossible to say with confid<strong>en</strong>ce that maternal mortality hasincreased.Although overall female mortality rates from the 2008-09 data were lower than those of 2003,it should be noted that maternal mortality estimates are subject to larger sampling errors than are adultmortality estimates. Second, studies have shown that a rise in the maternal mortality ratio can beaccompanied by falls in both the maternal mortality rate and the g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate. In the case ofthe 2008-09 KDHS, there was a small increase in the maternal mortality rate (0.8 in 2008-09 and 0.6in 2003) accompanied by a fall in the age-standardized g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate (0.161 in 2008-09 and0.166 in 2003); h<strong>en</strong>ce, there is an <strong>el</strong>evated maternal mortality ratio.The fifth Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Goal is to reduce the maternal mortality ratio by 75perc<strong>en</strong>t betwe<strong>en</strong> 1990 and 2015. The 2008-09 KDHS results show that maternal mortality remainshigh in K<strong>en</strong>ya. A strategy ess<strong>en</strong>tial to reducing the high maternal mortality rates is to <strong>en</strong>sure that allbirths are managed by skilled health professionals. Curr<strong>en</strong>tly the proportion of births managed byhealth professionals and the proportion d<strong>el</strong>ivered in a health facility are 44 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 43 perc<strong>en</strong>t,respectiv<strong>el</strong>y. However, the use of health professionals at birth varies, and h<strong>en</strong>ce differ<strong>en</strong>ces in the riskof maternal mortality in the country cannot be measured through the survey.AgeMaternaldeathsExposure(years)Mortalityrates15-19 9 32,004 0.320-24 27 34,544 0.825-29 22 31,332 0.730-34 22 25,764 0.835-39 26 18,846 1.440-44 16 11,890 1.345-49 6 6,733 0.915-49 127 161,113 0.8 aG<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate 0.161 aMaternal mortalityratio b - - 488aAge standardisedbPer 100,000 births; calculated as maternal mortality rate dividedby the g<strong>en</strong>eral fertility rate2 This time-dep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t definition includes all deaths that occurred during pregnancy and two months after pregnancy,ev<strong>en</strong> if the death is due to non-maternal causes. However, this definition is unlik<strong>el</strong>y to result in overreportingof maternal deaths because most deaths to wom<strong>en</strong> during the two-month period are due to maternalcauses, and maternal deaths are more lik<strong>el</strong>y to be underreported than overreported.Adult and Maternal Mortality | 273


REFERENCESAgot, K.E., J.O. Ndinya-Achola, J.K. Kreiss, and N.S. Weiss. 2004. Risk of HIV-1 in rural K<strong>en</strong>ya: Acomparison of circumcised and uncircumcised m<strong>en</strong>. Epidemiology 15(2): 157-163.doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000112220.16977.82Assefa T., G. Davey, N. Dukers, D. Wolday, A. Worku, and T. Mess<strong>el</strong>e. 2003. Overall HIV-1preval<strong>en</strong>ce in pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> over-estimates HIV-1 in the predominantly rural population of AfarRegion. Ethiop Med J 41(supplem<strong>en</strong>t 1):43-49.Auvert, B., A. Buve, E. Lagarde, M. Kahindo, J. Chege, N. Rut<strong>en</strong>berg, R. Musonda, M. Laourou, E.Akam, and H. A. Weiss. 2001. Male circumcision and HIV infection in four cities in sub-SaharanAfrica. AIDS 15(Supplem<strong>en</strong>t 4): S31-S40. doi:10.1097/00002030-200108004-00004Baet<strong>en</strong>, J.M., B.H. Chohan, L. Lavreys, J.P. Rakwar, R. Ashley, B. Richardson, Barbra, K.Mandaliya, J.B. Bwayo, and J.K. Kreiss. 2002. Corr<strong>el</strong>ates of human herpes virus 8 seropositivityamong heterosexual m<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya. AIDS 16(15): 2073-2078. doi:10.1097/00002030-200210180-00013Bailey, R.C., S. Moses, C.B. Parker, K. Agot, I Maclean, J.N. Krieger, C.F. Williams, R.T. Campb<strong>el</strong>l,and J.O. Ndinya_Achola. 2007. Male circumcision for HIV prev<strong>en</strong>tion in young m<strong>en</strong> in Kisumu,K<strong>en</strong>ya: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 369(9562): 643-56. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60312-2Black, R.E., S.S. Morris, and J. Bryce. 2003. Where and why are 10 million childr<strong>en</strong> dying everyyear? Lancet 361(9376): 2226-34. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13779-8Boerma, T.J. 1988. Monitoring and evaluation of health interv<strong>en</strong>tions: Age- and cause-specificmortality and morbidity in childhood. In Research and interv<strong>en</strong>tions issues concerning infant andchild mortality and health, 195-218. Proceedings of the East Africa Workshop, InternationalDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Research C<strong>en</strong>ter, Manuscript Report 200e. Ottawa, Canada.Boerma J.T., P. Ghys, and N. Walker. 2003. Estimates of HIV-1 preval<strong>en</strong>ce from national populationbasedsurveys as a new gold standard. Lancet 362:1929-1931. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14967-7Bongaarts, J. 2006. The causes of stalling fertility transitions. Studies in Family Planning 37(1): 1-16.doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00079.xBradley, A.K., A.M. Gre<strong>en</strong>wood, P. Byass, B.M. Gre<strong>en</strong>wood, K. Marsh, S. Tulloch, and R. Hayes.1986. Bed nets (mosquito nets) and morbidity from malaria. Lancet 328(8500): 204-207. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13779-8Buve, A., M. Cara<strong>el</strong>, R. J. Hayes, B. Auvert, B. Ferry, N.J. Robinson, S. Anagonou, L. Kanhonou, M.Laourou, S. Abega, E. Akam, L. Zek<strong>en</strong>g, J. Chege, M. Kahindo, N. Rut<strong>en</strong>berg, F. Kaona, R.Musonda, T. Sukwa, L. Morison, H.A. Weiss, and M. Laga, for the Study Group on Heterog<strong>en</strong>eity ofHIV Epidemics in African Cities. 2001. The multic<strong>en</strong>tre study on factors determining the differ<strong>en</strong>tialspread of HIV in four African cities: Summary and conclusions. AIDS 15(Supplem<strong>en</strong>t 4): S127-S131.doi:10.1097/00002030-200108004-00014C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Finance and Planning. 1970. 1969 populationc<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 4. Nairobi: CBS.Refer<strong>en</strong>ces | 275


C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Finance and Planning. 1981. 1979 populationc<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 2. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. 1984.K<strong>en</strong>ya contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>ce survey 1984. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. 1994.K<strong>en</strong>ya population c<strong>en</strong>sus, 1989. Vol. 1. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. 2001a.Population distribution by administrative areas and urban c<strong>en</strong>tres, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population andhousing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 1. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. 2001b.Socio-economic Profile of the population, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 2.Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. 2002a.Analytical report on population dynamics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 3.Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002b. Analyticalreport on fertility and nuptiality, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 4. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002c. Analyticalreport on mortality, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 5. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002d. Analyticalreport on population projections, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 7. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002e. Analyticalreport on education, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 8. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002f. Analyticalreport on labour force, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 9. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002g. Analyticalreport on housing conditions and household am<strong>en</strong>ities, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus.Vol. 10. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2002h. Analyticalreport on g<strong>en</strong>der dim<strong>en</strong>sions, K<strong>en</strong>ya 1999 population and housing c<strong>en</strong>sus. Vol. 11. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2003a. Economicsurvey. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t]. 2003b. Statisticalabstract. Nairobi: CBS.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics [Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t] and UNICEF. 2003.Multiple indicator cluster survey (MICS) Report, 2000. Nairobi: CBS and UNICEF.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Ministry of Health (MOH), and ORC Macro. 2004. K<strong>en</strong>yademographic and health survey 2003.Calverton, Maryland: CBS, MOH, and ORC Macro.C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics (CBS). 2006. Revised population projections for K<strong>en</strong>ya: 2000-2010.Nairobi: CBS.276 | Refer<strong>en</strong>ces


Division of Malaria Control, Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation, 2009. 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya malariaindicator survey (KMIS), Nairobi, K<strong>en</strong>ya.Division of Reproductive Health, Ministry of Health. 2005. National reproductive health policy(Draft). Nairobi: Ministry of Health.Fabiani M., K. Fylkesnes, B. Nattabi, E.O. Ay<strong>el</strong>la, and S. Declich. 2003. Evaluating two adjustm<strong>en</strong>tmethods to extrapolate HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce from pregnant wom<strong>en</strong> to the g<strong>en</strong>eral female population insub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 17(3):399-405. doi:10.1097/00002030-200302140-00014Fylkesnes K., Z. Ndhlovu, K. Kasumba, R.M. Musonda, and M. Sichone. 1998. Studying dynamics ofthe HIV epidemic: Population-based data compared with s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance in Zambia. AIDS 1998;12(10):1227-1234. doi:10.1097/00002030-199810000-00015Garcia-Calleja J.M., E. Zaniewski, P.D. Ghys, K. Stanecki, N. Walker. 2004. A global analysis oftr<strong>en</strong>ds in the quality of HIV sero-surveillance. Sex Transm Infect 80 (supplem<strong>en</strong>t 1):i25-i30.doi:10.1136/sti.2004.010298Garcia-Calleja, J.M, L.H. Marum, C.P. Cárcamo, L. Kaetano, J. Muttunga, and A.Way. May 2005.Lessons learned in the conduct, validation, and interpretation of national population based HIVsurveys. AIDS 19 (Supplem<strong>en</strong>t 2):S9-S17. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000172872.88347.f3Ghys P.D., T. Brown, N.C. Grassly, G. Garnett, K.A. Stanecki, J. Stover, and N. Walker. 2004. TheUNAIDS estimations and projection package: A software package to estimate and project nationalHIV epidemics. Sex Transm Infect 80 (supplem<strong>en</strong>t 1):i5-i9. doi:10.1136/sti.2004.010199Gl<strong>en</strong>ngård, A.H., and T.M. Maina. 2007. Reversing the tr<strong>en</strong>d of weak policy implem<strong>en</strong>tation in theK<strong>en</strong>yan health sector? – A study of budget allocation and sp<strong>en</strong>ding of health resources versus setpriorities. Health Res Policy Sys. 5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-5-3.Glynn J.R., A. Buve, M. Cara<strong>el</strong>, R.M. Musonda, M. Kahindo, I. Macauley, F. Tembo, L. Zek<strong>en</strong>g, andthe Study Group on Heterog<strong>en</strong>eity of HIV Epidemics in African Cities. 2001. Factors influ<strong>en</strong>cing thediffer<strong>en</strong>ce in HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> ant<strong>en</strong>atal clinic and g<strong>en</strong>eral population in sub-Saharan Africa.AIDS 15(13):1717-1725. doi:10.1097/00002030-200109070-00016Graham, W., W. Brass, and R.W. Snow. 1989. Indirect estimation of maternal mortality: Thesisterhood method. Studies in Family Planning 20(3): 125-135. doi:10.2307/1966567Gregson S., N. Terceira, M. Kakowa, R.M. Mason, R.M. Anderson, S.K. Chandiwana, and M. Cara<strong>el</strong>.2003. Study of bias in ant<strong>en</strong>atal clinic HIV-1 surveillance data in a high contraceptive preval<strong>en</strong>cepopulation in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 17(Supplem<strong>en</strong>t 4):S122-S123. doi:10.1097/00002030-200317004-00024Gwatkin, D.R., S. Rutstein, K. Johnson, R.P. Pande, and A. Wagstaff. 2000. Socio-economicdiffer<strong>en</strong>ces in health, nutrition and poverty. HNP/Poverty Thematic Group of the World Bank.Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Health Policy Initiative. October 2007. K<strong>en</strong>ya adopts first national reproductive health policy.Available at http://www.healthpolicyinitiative.com.Health Policy Initiative. September 2009. Investing wis<strong>el</strong>y: Health policy initiative h<strong>el</strong>ps K<strong>en</strong>ya toimprove health financing policies and systems. Available at http://www.healthpolicyinitiative.com.Heise, L., J. Pitanguy and A. Germain. 1994. Viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong>: The hidd<strong>en</strong> health burd<strong>en</strong>.Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Refer<strong>en</strong>ces | 277


Heise, L., M. Ellsberg, and M. Gottemo<strong>el</strong>ler. 1999. Ending viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong>. PopulationReports, Series L, No. 11. Baltimore, Maryland.: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health,Population Information Program.Hossain, M.I., and C.F. Curtis. 1989. Permethrin impregnated bed nets: Behavioural and killingeffects on mosquitoes. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 3(4): 367-376 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.1989.tb00243.xJejeeboy, S.J. 1998. Associations betwe<strong>en</strong> wife-beating and fetal and infant death: Impressions from asurvey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning 29(3): 300-308. doi:10.2307/172276K<strong>en</strong>ya: The fringe b<strong>en</strong>efits of male circumcision rollout. January 6, 2010. PlusNews. Retrieved fromhttp://www.plusnews.org/Report.aspx?Report ID=87640K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2007. K<strong>en</strong>ya integrated household budget survey(KIHBS) 2005/06. Nairobi: KNBSK<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2008. W<strong>el</strong>l-Being in K<strong>en</strong>ya, a socio-economic profile.Nairobi: KNBSK<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS). 2009. Economic survey 2009, Governm<strong>en</strong>t Printer,Nairobi: KNBSKiragu, K. et al. 1998. Adolesc<strong>en</strong>t reproductive health needs in K<strong>en</strong>ya: A communication response,Evaluation of the K<strong>en</strong>ya Youth Initiatives Project. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, PopulationCommunication Services.Kwesigabo G., J. Z., Killewo, and A. Sandstrom. 1996. S<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance and cross sectionalsurvey on HIV infection preval<strong>en</strong>ce: A comparative study. East Afr Med J 73:298-302.Lindsay, S.W., and M.E. Gibson. 1988. Bed nets revisited: Old idea, new angle. Parasitology Today4: 270- 272. doi:10.1016/0169-4758(88)90017-8Lines, J.D., J. Myamba, and C.F. Curtis. 1987. Experim<strong>en</strong>tal hut trials of permethrin-impregnatedmosquito nets and eave curtains against malaria vectors in Tanzania. Medical and VeterinaryEntomology 1(1): 37-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1987.tb00321.xMboup, G., and T. Saha. 1998. Fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s, tr<strong>en</strong>ds and differ<strong>en</strong>tials. DHS Comparative StudiesNo. 28. Calverton, Maryland: Macro International Inc.M<strong>en</strong><strong>en</strong>dez, C. 1999. Priority areas for curr<strong>en</strong>t research on malaria during pregnancy. Annals ofTropical Medicine and Parasitology 93(Supplem<strong>en</strong>t 1): 1-74. doi:10.1080/00034989957763Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 1999a. Strategic plan for the K<strong>en</strong>ya national HIV/AIDS/STDscontrol programme for 1999-2004. Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 1999b. The national health sector strategic plan: 1999-2004.Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2000. National policy on infant and young child feedingpractices. Nairobi: Ministry of Health.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2001. AIDS in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. n.d. National malaria strategy 2001-2010. Nairobi: Ministry ofHealth.278 | Refer<strong>en</strong>ces


Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2002. National guid<strong>el</strong>ines prev<strong>en</strong>tion of mother to childHIV/AIDS transmission. Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2003. HIV/AIDS surveillance in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2003. Behavioral Surveillance Survey 2002: Summary report,HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Nairobi: National AIDS/ STI ControlProgram, Ministry of Health.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2004. The second national health sector strategic plan: 2005-2010. Nairobi: MOH.Ministry of Health (MOH) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCPD), andORC Macro. 2000. K<strong>en</strong>ya service provision assessm<strong>en</strong>t survey 1999. Calverton, Maryland: MOH,NCPD, and ORC Macro.Ministry of Planning and National Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (MPND) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2003. Economic recovery strategyfor wealth and employm<strong>en</strong>t creation. Nairobi: MPND.Mosley, W.H., and L.C. Ch<strong>en</strong> (eds.). 1984. Child survival: Strategies for research (supplem<strong>en</strong>t). Ananalytical framework for the study of child survival in dev<strong>el</strong>oping countries. Population andDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t Review 10:22-45National AIDS Control Council (NACC) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2009. K<strong>en</strong>ya national AIDS strategic plan2009/10-2012/13: D<strong>el</strong>ivering on universal access to services. Nairobi: NACC.National AIDS and STD Control Programme/National AIDS Control Council. 2006. UnpublishedHIV s<strong>en</strong>tin<strong>el</strong> surveillance preval<strong>en</strong>ce data. Paper pres<strong>en</strong>ted at the Joint AIDS Program Review(JAIPR), 12-13 October 2006. Nairobi: K<strong>en</strong>ya School of Monetary Studies.National AIDS/STI Control Programme (NASCOP), K<strong>en</strong>ya. 2009. 2007 K<strong>en</strong>ya AIDS IndicatorSurvey: Final Report. Nairobi: NASCOP.National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCPD) [K<strong>en</strong>ya]. 2000. National populationpolicy for sustainable dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. Sessional Paper No. 1. Nairobi: NCPD.National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCPD) [K<strong>en</strong>ya] and Institute for ResourceDev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t/Macro Systems Inc. (IRD). 1989. K<strong>en</strong>ya demographic and health survey 1989.Columbia, Maryland: NCPD and IRD.National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCPD) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics(CBS), and Macro International Inc. (MI). 1994. K<strong>en</strong>ya demographic and health survey 1993.Calverton, Maryland: NCPD, CBS, and MI.National Council for Population and Dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t (NCPD) [K<strong>en</strong>ya], C<strong>en</strong>tral Bureau of Statistics(CBS), and Macro International Inc. (MI). 1999. K<strong>en</strong>ya demographic and health survey 1998.Calverton, Maryland: NCPD, CBS, and MI.Neequaye, A.R., J.E. Neequaye, R.J. Biggar, J.A. Mingle, J. Drummond, and D. Waters. 1997. HIV-1and HIV-2 in Ghana, West Africa: Community surveys compared to surveys of pregnant wom<strong>en</strong>.West Afr J Med 16:102-108.Ngigi, A. and D Macharia. 2006. K<strong>en</strong>ya Health Sector Policy Overview Paper. Retrieved fromhttp://www.<strong>en</strong>able.nu/publication/D_1_7_K<strong>en</strong>ya_Health_Policy_Overview.pdf].Odini, L. H. 2008, June 13. Adolesc<strong>en</strong>t reproductive health and dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t policy 2005-2015.AIDSPortal. Retrieved from http://www.aidsportal.org/Article_Details.aspx?ID=7811Refer<strong>en</strong>ces | 279


Ogechi, Elizaphan. 2007. The second K<strong>en</strong>ya National Health Sector Strategic Plan (NHSSP II: 2004–2010). AIDSPortal. Retrieved from http://www.aidsportal.org/Article_Details.aspxORC Macro. 2004. Evaluating the impact of nonresponse on the KDHS HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce estimates.Calverton, Maryland, USA.Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). 2003. Guidingprinciples for complem<strong>en</strong>tary feeding of the breastfed child. Washington/G<strong>en</strong>eva: PAHO/WHO.Rut<strong>en</strong>berg, N., and J. Sullivan. 1991. Direct and indirect estimates of maternal mortality from thesisterhood method. In Proceedings of the Demographic and Health Surveys World Confer<strong>en</strong>ce, Vol.3, 1669-1696. Columbia, Maryland: IRD/Macro International Inc.Rutstein, S. 1999. Wealth versus exp<strong>en</strong>diture: Comparison betwe<strong>en</strong> the DHS wealth index andhousehold exp<strong>en</strong>ditures in four departm<strong>en</strong>ts of Guatemala. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro.Rutstein, S., K. Johnson, and D. Gwatkin. 2000. Poverty, health inequality, and its health anddemographic effects. Paper pres<strong>en</strong>ted at the 2000 Annual Meeting of the Population Association ofAmerica, Los Ang<strong>el</strong>es, California.Rutstein, S.O. 2002. Fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s, tr<strong>en</strong>ds, and differ<strong>en</strong>tials 1995-1999. DHS Comparative ReportsNo. 3. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro.Rutstein, S.O., and K. Johnson. 2004. The DHS wealth index. DHS Comparative Reports No 6.Calverton, Maryland, USA: ORC Macro.Shryock, H.S., and J.S. Sieg<strong>el</strong>. 1973. The methods and materials of demography. Orlando, Florida(U.S.A.): Academic Press, Inc.Stanton, C., N. Abderrahim, and K. Hill. 1997. DHS maternal mortality indicators: An assessm<strong>en</strong>t ofdata quality and implications for data use. DHS Analytical Reports No. 4. Calverton, Maryland,USA: Macro International Inc.Strauss, M.A. 1990. Measuring intrafamily conflict and viol<strong>en</strong>ce: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. InM.A. Strauss and R.J. G<strong>el</strong>les (eds.), Physical viol<strong>en</strong>ce in American families: Risk factors andadaptations to viol<strong>en</strong>ce in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 39-47.UNAIDS Refer<strong>en</strong>ce Group on Estimates, Mod<strong>el</strong>ing and Projections. 2002. Improved methods andassumptions for estimation of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and its impact: Recomm<strong>en</strong>dations of theUNAIDS refer<strong>en</strong>ce group on estimates, mod<strong>el</strong>ing and projections. AIDS 16(9):W1-W16.doi:10.1097/00002030-200206140-00024United Nations. 1973. The determinants and consequ<strong>en</strong>ces of population tr<strong>en</strong>ds. Vol. 1. New York:United Nations.United Nations. 1983. Indirect techniques for demographic estimation. Manual X. New York: UnitedNations.United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly. 1991. Advancem<strong>en</strong>t of wom<strong>en</strong>: Conv<strong>en</strong>tion on the <strong>el</strong>imination ofall forms of discrimination against wom<strong>en</strong>, Report of the Secretary-G<strong>en</strong>eral. New York: UnitedNations.United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly. 2001. Road map towards the implem<strong>en</strong>tation of the UnitedNations Mill<strong>en</strong>nium Declaration: Report of the Secretary-G<strong>en</strong>eral. New York: United NationsG<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly.280 | Refer<strong>en</strong>ces


United Nations G<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly. 2002. Building a World Fit for Childr<strong>en</strong>: The United NationsG<strong>en</strong>eral Assembly Special Session on Childr<strong>en</strong>, 8-10 May, 2002. New York: United Nations.United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’s Fund (UNICEF). 2006. Child protection information sheets. New York:UNICEF.United Nations Population Division. No date. Fertility lev<strong>el</strong>s and tr<strong>en</strong>ds in countries withintermediate lev<strong>el</strong>s of fertility. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/completingfertility/RevisedFFPSPOPDIVpaper.<strong>PDF</strong>UNIFEM. 2003. Not a minute more; <strong>en</strong>ding viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong>. New York: UNIFEM.Walker N., K.A. Stanecki, T. Brown, J. Stover, S. Lazzari, J.M. Garcia-Calleja, B. Schwartlander, andP.D. Ghys. 2003. Methods and procedures for estimates HIV/AIDS and its impact: theUNAIDS/WHO estimates for the <strong>en</strong>d of 2001. AIDS 17:2215-2225. doi:10.1097/00002030-200310170-00010World Health Organisation (WHO). 1999. Viol<strong>en</strong>ce against wom<strong>en</strong>, a priority health issue.WHO/FRH/WHD/97.8. G<strong>en</strong>eva: WHO.World Health Organisation (WHO) and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).2000. Guid<strong>el</strong>ines for second g<strong>en</strong>eration HIV surveillance. G<strong>en</strong>eva: WHO and UNAIDS.WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. 2004. Meeting on theMDG drinking water and sanitation target: a mid-term assessm<strong>en</strong>t of progress. New York: WorldHealth Organization and United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’s Fund.WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. 2005. Water for life:making it happ<strong>en</strong>. G<strong>en</strong>eva: World Health Organization and United Nations Childr<strong>en</strong>’s Fund.World Health Organisation. 2005. Guiding principles for feeding nonbreastfed childr<strong>en</strong> 6 to 24months of age, G<strong>en</strong>eva: WHO.World Health Organization (WHO) Multic<strong>en</strong>tre Growth Refer<strong>en</strong>ce Study Group. 2006. WHO Childgrowth standards: L<strong>en</strong>gth/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-l<strong>en</strong>gth, weight-for-height andbody mass index-for-age: Methods and dev<strong>el</strong>opm<strong>en</strong>t. G<strong>en</strong>eva: World Health Organization.World Health Organization (WHO) and UNAIDS. 2007. New data on male circumcision and HIVpreval<strong>en</strong>ce: Policy and programme implications. G<strong>en</strong>eva: World Health Organization and UNAIDS.Yin, S., and M. K<strong>en</strong>t. 2008, January. K<strong>en</strong>ya: The demographics of a country in turmoil. Retrievedfrom http://www.prb.org/Articles/2008/K<strong>en</strong>ya.aspxZaba B., T. Boerma, and R. White. Monitoring the AIDS epidemic using HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce data amongyoung wom<strong>en</strong> att<strong>en</strong>ding ant<strong>en</strong>atal clinics: Prospects and problems. 2000. AIDS 14(11):1633-1645.doi:10.1097/00002030-200007280-00020Zimmerman, C. 1994. Plates in a basket will rattle: Domestic viol<strong>en</strong>ce in Cambodia. Phnom P<strong>en</strong>h:The Asia Foundation, USAID.Refer<strong>en</strong>ces | 281


SAMPLE IMPLEMENTATIONApp<strong>en</strong>dix ATable A.1 Sample implem<strong>en</strong>tation: wom<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households and <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> by results of the household and individual interviews, and household, <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> andoverall response rates, according to urban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce and province, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09ResultResid<strong>en</strong>ceProvinceUrban Rural Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern Nyanza Rift Valley WesternNorthEasternTotalS<strong>el</strong>ected householdsCompleted (C) 88.6 92.4 85.2 93.6 97.0 91.6 90.6 90.5 88.4 93.9 91.2Household pres<strong>en</strong>t but nocompet<strong>en</strong>t respond<strong>en</strong>t athome (HP) 1.4 0.7 1.9 1.4 0.2 0.7 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.9Refused (R) 1.8 0.5 2.5 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.9Dw<strong>el</strong>ling not found (DNF) 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.8 0.3Household abs<strong>en</strong>t (HA) 2.7 2.0 3.2 1.3 0.2 2.7 2.3 3.0 2.3 2.8 2.2Dw<strong>el</strong>ling vacant/addressnot a dw<strong>el</strong>ling (DV) 3.8 2.8 5.5 2.1 1.4 1.8 4.4 3.5 4.5 0.3 3.1Dw<strong>el</strong>ling destroy (DD) 1.5 1.1 1.4 0.6 0.6 1.6 0.8 1.2 3.1 0.1 1.2Other (O) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of sampledhouseholds 3,286 6,650 1,300 1,211 1,250 1,350 1,450 1,500 1,200 675 9,936Household response rate(HRR) 96.5 98.3 95.0 97.6 99.2 97.6 98.5 98.2 98.1 97.2 97.7Eligible wom<strong>en</strong>Completed (EWC) 95.6 96.6 94.7 94.8 97.9 96.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 97.0 96.3Not at home (EWNH) 2.3 1.7 2.9 2.3 0.9 2.0 2.5 1.9 1.2 1.3 1.9Postponed (EWP) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Refused (EWR) 1.4 0.6 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.3 1.0 0.8Partly completed (EWPC) 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2Incapacitated (EWI) 0.3 0.8 0.3 1.1 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.8 0.7Other (EWO) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of wom<strong>en</strong> 2,735 6,032 1,005 1,026 1,174 1,171 1,368 1,326 1,070 627 8,767Eligible wom<strong>en</strong> responserate (EWRR) 95.6 96.6 94.7 94.8 97.9 96.2 96.3 96.4 97.1 97.0 96.3Overall response rate(ORR) 92.3 95.0 90.0 92.5 97.1 93.9 94.9 94.6 95.2 94.3 94.1App<strong>en</strong>dix A | 283


Table A.2 Sample implem<strong>en</strong>tation: m<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of households and <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong> by results of the household and individual interviews, and household, <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong> and overallresponse rates, according to urban-rural resid<strong>en</strong>ce and province, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09ResultResid<strong>en</strong>ceProvinceUrban Rural Nairobi C<strong>en</strong>tral Coast Eastern Nyanza Rift Valley WesternNorthEasternTotalS<strong>el</strong>ected householdsCompleted (C) 88.1 91.8 84.0 93.9 96.8 91.5 89.0 90.4 87.3 94.0 90.6Household pres<strong>en</strong>t but nocompet<strong>en</strong>t respond<strong>en</strong>t athome (HP) 1.0 0.8 1.8 0.8 0.2 1.0 1.1 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.8Refused (R) 1.9 0.4 2.7 0.7 0.5 1.3 0.1 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.9Dw<strong>el</strong>ling not found (DNF) 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.1 0.3Household abs<strong>en</strong>t (HA) 3.1 2.0 3.7 1.8 0.2 2.7 2.7 3.4 1.5 3.0 2.4Dw<strong>el</strong>ling vacant/addressnot a dw<strong>el</strong>ling (DV) 4.0 3.2 6.1 2.1 1.4 1.5 5.5 3.4 5.6 0.0 3.4Dw<strong>el</strong>ling destroy (DD) 1.5 1.2 1.4 0.5 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.2 3.6 0.0 1.3Other (O) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of sampledhouseholds 1,653 3,319 656 611 625 670 728 742 604 336 4,972Household response rate(HRR) 96.7 98.3 94.7 98.5 99.3 96.8 98.6 98.5 97.8 97.2 97.7Eligible m<strong>en</strong>Completed (EMC) 85.4 90.2 88.7 83.4 92.9 87.1 89.3 90.2 90.2 84.6 88.6Not at home (EMNH) 10.0 7.1 6.9 10.5 5.0 8.5 9.1 7.5 5.8 13.9 8.1Refused (EMR) 3.4 1.6 3.8 4.3 0.8 3.3 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 2.1Partly completed (EMPC) 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.2Incapacitated (EMI) 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 2.0 0.4 0.7Other (EMO) 0.5 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Number of m<strong>en</strong> 1,269 2,641 477 465 482 519 606 602 500 259 3,910Eligible m<strong>en</strong> response rate(EMRR) 85.4 90.2 88.7 83.4 92.9 87.1 89.3 90.2 90.2 84.6 88.6Overall response rate(ORR) 82.6 88.6 84.0 82.2 92.3 84.3 88.1 88.9 88.2 82.2 86.6284 | App<strong>en</strong>dix A


Table A.3 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> by social and demographic characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 by HIV testing status, according to social anddemographic characteristics (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-2009Testing statusCharacteristicDBS testedRefused toprovidebloodAbs<strong>en</strong>t at thetime of bloodcollectionOther/missingTotalNumberMarital statusNever married 88.5 9.5 0.4 1.7 100.0 1,291Ever had sex 89.8 8.1 0.7 1.4 100.0 571Never had sex 87.4 10.6 0.1 1.9 100.0 720Married/Living together 90.6 8.0 0.0 1.4 100.0 2,523Divorced or separated 89.1 8.9 1.2 0.8 100.0 257Widowed 89.1 9.2 0.0 1.7 100.0 174Type of unionIn polygynous union 88.4 9.3 0.0 2.3 100.0 398Not in polygynous union 90.9 7.7 0.0 1.3 100.0 2,085Not curr<strong>en</strong>tly in union 88.6 9.3 0.5 1.6 100.0 1,722Ever had sexual intercourseYes 90.3 8.1 0.2 1.4 100.0 3,521No 87.4 10.6 0.1 1.9 100.0 720Curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnantPregnant 90.9 7.1 0.0 2.0 100.0 297Not pregnant or not sure 89.7 8.6 0.2 1.4 100.0 3,948EthnicityEmbu 95.0 3.8 0.0 1.3 100.0 80Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 91.4 5.3 0.3 3.0 100.0 397Kamba 88.4 10.1 0.0 1.5 100.0 336Kikuyu 89.8 9.5 0.5 0.1 100.0 745Kisii 95.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 221Luhya 91.3 7.5 0.2 1.1 100.0 640Luo 92.5 7.0 0.2 0.4 100.0 570Maasai 63.6 32.7 1.8 1.8 100.0 55Meru 94.6 4.3 0.0 1.1 100.0 184Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 92.9 6.5 0.0 0.6 100.0 336Somali 74.2 17.4 0.3 8.1 100.0 345Taita/Taveta 93.8 3.1 0.0 3.1 100.0 65Other 90.7 9.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 270R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 91.2 8.3 0.1 0.3 100.0 879Protestant other Christian 91.2 7.3 0.3 1.2 100.0 2,578Muslim 82.8 12.8 0.1 4.3 100.0 674No r<strong>el</strong>igion 87.7 12.3 0.0 0.0 100.0 81Total 89.8 8.5 0.2 1.5 100.0 4,245Note: Total includes 40 wom<strong>en</strong> missing information on type of union, 4 missing information on sexualintercourse, 1 missing information on ethnicity, and 4 missing information on r<strong>el</strong>igion.App<strong>en</strong>dix A | 285


Table A.4 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed m<strong>en</strong> by social and demographic characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of interviewed m<strong>en</strong> 15-49[54] by HIV testing status, according to social and demographiccharacteristics (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Testing statusCharacteristicDBS testedRefused toprovidebloodAbs<strong>en</strong>t at thetime of bloodcollectionOther/missingTotalNumberMarital statusNever married 89.9 7.9 0.1 2.1 100.0 1,502Ever had sex 90.2 7.8 0.1 1.9 100.0 964Never had sex 89.2 8.0 0.2 2.6 100.0 538Married/Living together 88.9 9.4 0.3 1.3 100.0 1,824Divorced or separated 87.0 12.2 0.0 0.9 100.0 115Type of unionIn polygynous union 87.9 10.2 0.6 1.3 100.0 157Not in polygynous union 89.0 9.4 0.3 1.3 100.0 1,665Not curr<strong>en</strong>tly in union 89.8 8.1 0.1 2.0 100.0 1,641Ever had sexual intercourseYes 89.3 9.0 0.2 1.5 100.0 2,926No 89.2 8.0 0.2 2.6 100.0 538Male circumcisionCircumcised 89.2 9.0 0.0 1.8 100.0 2,913Not circumcised 90.2 7.6 1.3 0.9 100.0 551EthnicityEmbu 88.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 83Kal<strong>en</strong>jin 90.8 6.3 0.0 2.8 100.0 316Kamba 87.8 10.8 0.3 1.0 100.0 286Kikuyu 86.0 13.0 0.0 1.0 100.0 584Kisii 94.7 4.8 0.0 0.5 100.0 188Luhya 92.0 7.6 0.0 0.4 100.0 566Luo 89.3 8.0 1.2 1.4 100.0 486Maasai (78.6) (21.4) (0.0) (0.0) 100.0 42Meru 86.6 10.5 0.0 2.9 100.0 172Mijik<strong>en</strong>da/Swahili 94.9 4.3 0.0 0.8 100.0 257Somali 80.7 10.3 0.0 9.0 100.0 223Taita/Taveta 94.5 1.8 0.0 3.6 100.0 55Other 92.3 7.2 0.5 0.0 100.0 207R<strong>el</strong>igionRoman Catholic 91.3 7.9 0.2 0.6 100.0 826Protestant/other Christian 89.3 8.9 0.3 1.5 100.0 1,997Muslim 86.7 8.7 0.0 4.6 100.0 459No r<strong>el</strong>igion 90.6 8.6 0.0 0.7 100.0 139Total 89.3 8.8 0.2 1.6 100.0 3,465Note: Total includes 24 m<strong>en</strong> widowed, 2 missing information on type of union, 1 missing information onsexual intercourse, 1 missing information on circumcision, and 2 missing information on r<strong>el</strong>igion. Figures inpar<strong>en</strong>theses are based on 25-49 unweighted cases.286 | App<strong>en</strong>dix A


Table A.5 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> by sexual behaviour characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of interviewed wom<strong>en</strong> who ever had sexual intercourse by HIV test status, according to sexualbehaviour characteristics (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Testing statusSexual behaviourcharacteristicDBS testedRefused toprovidebloodAbs<strong>en</strong>t at thetime of bloodcollectionOther/missingTotalNumberAge at first sexual intercourse


Table A.6 Coverage of HIV testing among interviewed m<strong>en</strong> by sexual behaviour characteristicsPerc<strong>en</strong>t distribution of interviewed m<strong>en</strong> who ever had sexual intercourse by HIV test status, according to sexual behaviourcharacteristics (unweighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Testing statusSexual behaviourcharacteristicDBS testedRefused toprovidebloodAbs<strong>en</strong>t at thetime of bloodcollectionOther/missingTotalNumberAge at first sexual intercourse


ESTIMATES OF SAMPLING ERRORSApp<strong>en</strong>dix BEstimates derived from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: 1) non-samplingerrors and 2) sampling errors. Non-sampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implem<strong>en</strong>tingdata collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household,misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respond<strong>en</strong>t, and data<strong>en</strong>try errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implem<strong>en</strong>tation of the 2008-09 K<strong>en</strong>yaDemographic and Health Survey (2008-09 KDHS) to minimize this type of error, non-sampling errorsare impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. The sample of respond<strong>en</strong>tss<strong>el</strong>ected in the 2008-09 KDHS is only one of many samples that could have be<strong>en</strong> s<strong>el</strong>ected from thesame population, using the same design and expected size. Each of these samples would yi<strong>el</strong>d resultsthat differ somewhat from the results of the actual sample s<strong>el</strong>ected. Sampling errors are a measure ofthe variability betwe<strong>en</strong> all possible samples. Although the degree of variability is not known exactly,it can be estimated from the survey results.Sampling error is usually measured in terms of the standard error for a particular statistic(mean, perc<strong>en</strong>tage, etc.), which is the square root of the variance. The standard error can be used tocalculate confid<strong>en</strong>ce intervals within which the true value for the population can reasonably beassumed to fall. For example, for any giv<strong>en</strong> statistic calculated from a sample survey, the value of thatstatistic will fall within a range of plus or minus two times the standard error of that statistic in 95perc<strong>en</strong>t of all possible samples of id<strong>en</strong>tical size and design.If the sample of respond<strong>en</strong>ts had be<strong>en</strong> s<strong>el</strong>ected as a simple random sample, it would havebe<strong>en</strong> possible to use straightforward formulas for calculating sampling errors. However, the 2008-09KDHS sample is the result of a multi-stage stratified design, and consequ<strong>en</strong>tly, it was necessary to usea more complex formula. The computer software used to calculate sampling errors for the 2008-09KDHS is the sampling error module in ISSA (Integrated System for Survey Analysis). This moduleuses the Taylor linearization method of variance estimation for survey estimates that are means orproportions. Another approach, the Jackknife repeated replication method is used for varianceestimation of more complex statistics such as fertility and mortality rates.The Taylor linearization method treats any perc<strong>en</strong>tage or average as a ratio estimate, r = y/x,where y repres<strong>en</strong>ts the total sample value for variable y, and x repres<strong>en</strong>ts the total number of cases inthe group or subgroup under consideration. The variance of r is computed using the formula giv<strong>en</strong>b<strong>el</strong>ow, with the standard error being the square root of the variance:SE( r)= var(r)=2 1−x2fH∑⎡ m⎢⎢⎣mh⎛⎜⎝mh∑h= 1 h−1i=1z2hiz−m2hh⎞⎥ ⎥ ⎤⎟⎠⎦in whichzhi= y− rx= yhi− rxhi, and h h hzApp<strong>en</strong>dix B | 289


where h repres<strong>en</strong>ts the stratum which varies from 1 to H,m h is the total number of clusters s<strong>el</strong>ected in the h th stratum,y hi is the sum of the weighted values of variable y in the i th cluster in the h th stratum,x hi is the sum of the weighted number of cases in the i th cluster in the h th stratum, andf is the overall sampling fraction, which is so small that it is ignored.The Jackknife repeated replication method derives estimates of complex rates from each ofseveral replications of the par<strong>en</strong>t sample, and calculates standard errors for these estimates usingsimple formulas. Each replication considers all but one cluster in the calculation of the estimates.Pseudo-indep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>t replications are thus created. In the 2008-09 KDHS, there were 398 non-emptyclusters. H<strong>en</strong>ce, 398 replications were created. The variance of a rate r is calculated as follows:2SE () r = var()r =1kk ( − 1)k∑i=1( r − r)i2in whichri= kr −( k −1)r(i)where rr (i)kis the estimate computed from the full sample of 398 clusters,is the estimate computed from the reduced sample of 397 clusters (i th cluster excluded),andis the total number of clusters.In addition to the standard error, the design effect (DEFT) for each estimate is also calculated.The design effect is defined as the ratio betwe<strong>en</strong> the standard error using the giv<strong>en</strong> sample design andthe standard error that would result if a simple random sample had be<strong>en</strong> used. A DEFT value of 1.0indicates that the sample design is as effici<strong>en</strong>t as a simple random sample, while a value greater than1.0 indicates the increase in the sampling error due to the use of a more complex and less statisticallyeffici<strong>en</strong>t design. R<strong>el</strong>ative errors and confid<strong>en</strong>ce limits for the estimates are also computed.Sampling errors for the 2008-09 KDHS are calculated for s<strong>el</strong>ected variables considered to beof primary interest for the wom<strong>en</strong>’s and m<strong>en</strong>’s samples. The results are pres<strong>en</strong>ted in this app<strong>en</strong>dix forthe country as a whole, for urban and rural areas, and for 8 provinces. For each variable, the type ofstatistic (mean, proportion, or rate) and the base population are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table B.1. Tables B.2 to B.12pres<strong>en</strong>t the value of the statistic (R), its standard error (SE), the number of unweighted (N) andweighted (WN) cases, the design effect (DEFT), the r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error (SE/R), and the 95 perc<strong>en</strong>tconfid<strong>en</strong>ce limits (R±2SE), for the s<strong>el</strong>ected variables including fertility and mortality rates. Thesampling errors for mortality rates are pres<strong>en</strong>ted for the whole country for the five-year periodpreceding the survey and by resid<strong>en</strong>ce and province for the t<strong>en</strong>-year period preceding the survey. TheDEFT is considered undefined wh<strong>en</strong> the standard error considering a simple random sample is zero(wh<strong>en</strong> the estimate is close to 0 or 1). In the case of the total fertility rate, the number of unweightedcases is not r<strong>el</strong>evant, as there is no known unweighted value for woman-years of exposure tochildbearing.The confid<strong>en</strong>ce interval (e.g., as calculated for childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49) can beinterpreted as follows: the overall average from the national sample is 5.601 and its standard error is0.144. Therefore, to obtain the 95 perc<strong>en</strong>t confid<strong>en</strong>ce limits, one adds and subtracts twice the standarderror to the sample estimate (i.e., 5.601 ± 2×0.144; in others words betwe<strong>en</strong> 5.313 and 5.888). Thereis a high probability (95 perc<strong>en</strong>t) that the true average number of childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to all wom<strong>en</strong>aged 40 to 49 is betwe<strong>en</strong> 5.313 and 5.888.For the wom<strong>en</strong>, the r<strong>el</strong>ative standard errors (SE/R) for the means and proportions rangebetwe<strong>en</strong> 2 perc<strong>en</strong>t and 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t, with an average r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error of 6.2 perc<strong>en</strong>t; the highest290 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


<strong>el</strong>ative standard errors are for indicators with very small values (e.g., Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using IUD at 15perc<strong>en</strong>t, Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using condom at 15 perc<strong>en</strong>t, and maternal mortality ratio at 16 perc<strong>en</strong>t). Ifindicators with very high values of r<strong>el</strong>ative standard errors (less those three indicators) were removed,th<strong>en</strong> the average drops to 5.6 perc<strong>en</strong>t. So in g<strong>en</strong>eral, the r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error for most indicators forthe country as a whole is small, except for indicators of very small size. The r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error forthe total fertility rate is small (under 4 perc<strong>en</strong>t). However, for the childhood mortality rates, theaverage r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error at the national lev<strong>el</strong> is much higher, about 11 perc<strong>en</strong>t.There are differ<strong>en</strong>tials in the r<strong>el</strong>ative standard error for indicators by sub-populations. Forexample, for the variable Unmet need for family planning, the r<strong>el</strong>ative standard errors as a perc<strong>en</strong>t ofthe estimated mean for the whole country, urban areas and rural areas are 3.2 perc<strong>en</strong>t, 5.6 perc<strong>en</strong>t, and3.7 perc<strong>en</strong>t, respectiv<strong>el</strong>y.For the total wom<strong>en</strong> sample, the value of the design effect (DEFT) averaged over all variablesis 1.83, which means that due to multi-stage clustering of the sample the average standard error isincreased by a factor of 1.83 over that in an equival<strong>en</strong>t simple random sample.App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 291


Table B.1 List of s<strong>el</strong>ected variables for sampling errors, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Variable Type Base populationWOMENNo education Proportion All wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49At least some secondary education Proportion All wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Total fertility rate (last 3 years) Rate All wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> 40-49 Proportion All wom<strong>en</strong> 40-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any method Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any modern method Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using female sterilisation Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using pill Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using IUD Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using injectables Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using male condoms Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using periodic abstin<strong>en</strong>ce Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Using public sector source for family planning Proportion All wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 using a modern methodWant no more childr<strong>en</strong> or sterilised Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Unmet need for family planning Proportion Curr<strong>en</strong>tly married wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> Mean All wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49Neonatal mortality rate (last 5 years) Rate Births in last 5 yearsPostneonatal mortality rate (last 5 years) Rate Births in last 5 yearsInfant mortality rate (last 5 or 10 years)* Rate Births in last 10 (5) yearsChild mortality rate (last 5 years) Rate Births in last 5 yearsUnder five mortality rate (last 5 or 10 years)* Rate Births in last 10 (5) yearsAnt<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, or midwife Proportion Wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 with birth in last 5 yearsBirth protected against tetanus Proportion Wom<strong>en</strong> 15-49 with birth in last 5 yearsD<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife Proportion Births in last 5 yearsD<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility Proportion Births in last 5 yearsChild received DPT 3 Proportion Childr<strong>en</strong> 12-23 monthsChild fully immunised Proportion Childr<strong>en</strong> 12-23 monthsChild had diarrhoea in last 2 weeks Proportion Childr<strong>en</strong> under 5Child treated with ORS Proportion Childr<strong>en</strong> under 5 with diarrhoea in last 2 weeksHeight for age (


Table B.2 Sampling Errors for K<strong>en</strong>yaVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.089 0.010 8444 8444 3.232 0.112 0.069 0.109At least some secondary education 0.343 0.016 8444 8444 3.006 0.045 0.312 0.374Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 4.558 0.170 na 23664 2.084 0.037 4.218 4.899Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 5.601 0.144 1400 1429 1.910 0.026 5.313 5.888Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.455 0.013 5041 4928 1.824 0.028 0.429 0.480Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.394 0.012 5041 4928 1.711 0.030 0.371 0.418Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using female sterilization 0.048 0.005 5041 4928 1.679 0.105 0.038 0.058Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using pill 0.072 0.006 5041 4928 1.601 0.081 0.061 0.084Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using IUD 0.016 0.002 5041 4928 1.306 0.146 0.011 0.020Using injectable 0.216 0.009 5041 4928 1.615 0.043 0.197 0.235Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using condom 0.018 0.003 5041 4928 1.404 0.146 0.013 0.023Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using periodic abstin<strong>en</strong>ce 0.047 0.006 5041 4928 1.946 0.124 0.035 0.058Obtained method from public sector source 0.573 0.019 2198 2329 1.758 0.032 0.536 0.610Want no more childr<strong>en</strong> or sterilised 0.536 0.015 5041 4928 2.117 0.028 0.506 0.566Unmet need for family planning 0.256 0.008 5041 4928 1.327 0.032 0.240 0.272Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.752 0.057 7911 8139 2.594 0.015 3.638 3.866Neonatal mortality rate (last 5 years) 30.922 3.738 6087 5882 1.453 0.121 23.446 38.399Postneonatal mortality rate (last 5 years) 20.822 2.615 6092 5884 1.301 0.126 15.591 26.053Infant mortality rate (last 5 years) 51.744 4.702 6096 5889 1.455 0.091 42.340 61.149Child mortality rate (last 5 years) 23.082 2.866 6128 5914 1.327 0.124 17.350 28.813Under five mortality rate (last 5 years) 73.632 5.974 6141 5926 1.548 0.081 61.684 85.580Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.915 0.008 4082 3973 1.776 0.009 0.899 0.931Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.725 0.010 4082 3973 1.491 0.014 0.704 0.746D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.438 0.017 6079 5852 2.185 0.039 0.404 0.471D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.426 0.017 6079 5852 2.179 0.039 0.393 0.459DPT-3 dose 0.864 0.015 1119 1096 1.441 0.017 0.834 0.894Fully immunized 0.683 0.020 1119 1096 1.391 0.029 0.644 0.722Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.166 0.009 5706 5481 1.790 0.057 0.147 0.185Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.388 0.025 946 909 1.462 0.064 0.338 0.438Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.353 0.011 5563 5470 1.539 0.030 0.332 0.374Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.067 0.005 5563 5470 1.408 0.074 0.057 0.077Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.161 0.010 5563 5470 1.853 0.063 0.141 0.181Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.303 0.012 5111 4946 1.616 0.038 0.280 0.326Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.557 0.015 9057 9057 2.930 0.027 0.527 0.588Child slept under an ITN last night 0.467 0.017 6098 5953 2.182 0.037 0.432 0.502Woman slept under ITN last night 0.411 0.016 8767 8849 2.672 0.039 0.379 0.443Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.140 0.011 2373 2264 1.550 0.079 0.118 0.162Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.237 0.012 5706 5481 1.946 0.052 0.213 0.262Child took antimalarial 0.232 0.019 1385 1302 1.501 0.080 0.194 0.269Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.487 0.013 8444 8444 2.360 0.026 0.462 0.513Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.012 0.002 8444 8444 1.369 0.136 0.009 0.015Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.180 0.009 5995 5981 1.754 0.048 0.163 0.198Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.392 0.012 4906 4336 1.728 0.031 0.368 0.416Maternal mortality ratio (last 10 years) 488.349 77.467 na na na 0.159 333.415 643.284HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.080 0.006 3811 3641 1.411 0.078 0.067 0.092MENNo education 0.034 0.006 3256 3258 1.749 0.163 0.023 0.046At least some secondary education 0.448 0.022 3256 3258 2.478 0.048 0.405 0.491Want no more childr<strong>en</strong> 0.440 0.029 1632 1592 2.384 0.067 0.381 0.499Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 4.037 0.085 3095 3123 1.726 0.021 3.867 4.207Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.558 0.015 3256 3258 1.764 0.027 0.528 0.589Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.093 0.007 3256 3258 1.334 0.073 0.080 0.107Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.354 0.015 2329 2323 1.546 0.043 0.324 0.385HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.043 0.005 2907 3066 1.343 0.118 0.033 0.053App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 293


Table B.3 Sampling Errors for UrbanVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.047 0.010 2615 2148 2.515 0.222 0.026 0.067At least some secondary education 0.576 0.025 2615 2148 2.634 0.044 0.525 0.627Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 2.920 0.288 na 6194 2.561 0.099 2.344 3.496Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 3.567 0.172 338 264 1.562 0.048 3.223 3.911Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.531 0.019 1421 1154 1.422 0.035 0.493 0.568Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.466 0.019 1421 1154 1.454 0.041 0.428 0.505Unmet need for family planning 0.202 0.011 1421 1154 1.067 0.056 0.179 0.225Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.122 0.057 2497 2097 1.804 0.018 3.008 3.237Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 62.757 7.936 2618 2039 1.372 0.126 46.885 78.629Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 74.457 8.962 2629 2042 1.443 0.120 56.533 92.381Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.958 0.010 1092 823 1.508 0.010 0.939 0.977Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.741 0.026 1092 823 1.976 0.035 0.689 0.794D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.748 0.030 1467 1074 2.132 0.040 0.688 0.808D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.747 0.030 1467 1074 2.142 0.040 0.687 0.807DPT-3 dose 0.877 0.033 294 252 1.785 0.038 0.811 0.944Fully immunized 0.629 0.033 294 252 1.198 0.053 0.563 0.696Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.168 0.022 1386 1010 2.021 0.133 0.123 0.212Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.403 0.061 212 169 1.768 0.151 0.282 0.525Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.264 0.026 1270 912 1.905 0.098 0.212 0.316Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.053 0.009 1270 912 1.316 0.170 0.035 0.071Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.103 0.018 1270 912 1.776 0.170 0.068 0.138Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.348 0.024 1241 926 1.626 0.069 0.301 0.396Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.578 0.034 2910 2350 3.697 0.059 0.510 0.645Child slept under an ITN last night 0.618 0.024 1406 1007 1.497 0.039 0.570 0.665Woman slept under ITN last night 0.469 0.042 2735 2244 3.716 0.089 0.385 0.552Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.155 0.031 614 457 2.100 0.198 0.094 0.217Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.220 0.020 1386 1010 1.629 0.093 0.180 0.261Child took antimalarial 0.257 0.057 298 223 2.009 0.221 0.144 0.371Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.620 0.025 2615 2148 2.598 0.040 0.571 0.669Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.022 0.005 2615 2148 1.686 0.220 0.012 0.032Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.251 0.017 1860 1545 1.691 0.068 0.217 0.285Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.332 0.026 1398 1022 2.062 0.078 0.280 0.384HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.104 0.016 1093 862 1.698 0.151 0.073 0.136MENNo education 0.014 0.006 1023 866 1.611 0.426 0.002 0.026At least some secondary education 0.709 0.040 1023 866 2.834 0.057 0.628 0.789Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.695 0.034 1023 866 2.376 0.049 0.626 0.763Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.105 0.016 1023 866 1.665 0.152 0.073 0.137Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.322 0.027 818 708 1.640 0.083 0.269 0.376HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.037 0.010 889 798 1.511 0.260 0.018 0.056294 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


Table B.4 Sampling Errors for RuralVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.104 0.013 5829 6296 3.193 0.123 0.078 0.129At least some secondary education 0.263 0.013 5829 6296 2.204 0.048 0.238 0.288Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 5.177 0.147 na 17470 1.622 0.028 4.883 5.470Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 6.061 0.138 1062 1165 1.622 0.023 5.786 6.336Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.431 0.015 3620 3774 1.819 0.035 0.402 0.461Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.372 0.014 3620 3774 1.714 0.037 0.345 0.400Unmet need for family planning 0.273 0.010 3620 3774 1.345 0.037 0.253 0.293Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.971 0.063 5414 6042 2.316 0.016 3.844 4.098Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 58.488 4.147 8979 9427 1.476 0.071 50.194 66.782Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 85.624 6.250 9033 9482 1.754 0.073 73.124 98.123Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.903 0.010 2990 3150 1.746 0.011 0.884 0.923Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.720 0.011 2990 3150 1.354 0.015 0.698 0.743D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.368 0.017 4612 4777 2.021 0.047 0.333 0.402D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.354 0.017 4612 4777 2.015 0.048 0.320 0.388DPT-3 dose 0.860 0.016 825 844 1.318 0.019 0.827 0.893Fully immunized 0.699 0.023 825 844 1.392 0.033 0.653 0.745Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.165 0.010 4320 4471 1.712 0.063 0.145 0.186Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.385 0.027 734 740 1.372 0.071 0.330 0.439Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.371 0.011 4293 4557 1.424 0.031 0.348 0.393Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.070 0.006 4293 4557 1.371 0.081 0.059 0.081Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.173 0.012 4293 4557 1.791 0.067 0.150 0.196Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.292 0.013 3870 4020 1.578 0.045 0.266 0.318Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.550 0.017 6147 6707 2.716 0.031 0.516 0.585Child slept under an ITN last night 0.436 0.020 4692 4946 2.147 0.045 0.397 0.476Woman slept under ITN last night 0.391 0.017 6032 6605 2.434 0.044 0.357 0.425Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.136 0.011 1759 1806 1.385 0.083 0.114 0.159Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.241 0.014 4320 4471 1.952 0.060 0.213 0.270Child took antimalarial 0.226 0.019 1087 1079 1.356 0.084 0.188 0.264Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.442 0.011 5829 6296 1.720 0.025 0.420 0.464Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.008 0.001 5829 6296 1.149 0.164 0.006 0.011Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.156 0.009 4135 4436 1.637 0.059 0.138 0.175Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.411 0.014 3508 3314 1.709 0.035 0.382 0.439HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.072 0.006 2718 2779 1.291 0.089 0.059 0.085MENNo education 0.042 0.007 2233 2392 1.709 0.173 0.027 0.056At least some secondary education 0.353 0.017 2233 2392 1.647 0.047 0.320 0.387Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.509 0.014 2233 2392 1.296 0.027 0.482 0.537Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.089 0.007 2233 2392 1.185 0.080 0.075 0.103Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.368 0.018 1511 1615 1.452 0.049 0.332 0.404HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.045 0.006 2018 2268 1.271 0.131 0.033 0.056App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 295


Table B.5 Sampling Errors for NairobiVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.025 0.012 952 728 2.386 0.488 0.001 0.048At least some secondary education 0.681 0.040 952 728 2.627 0.058 0.602 0.760Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 2.825 0.414 na 2111 2.023 0.147 1.997 3.653Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 3.407 0.298 120 73 1.579 0.088 2.811 4.004Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.553 0.034 470 363 1.489 0.062 0.485 0.622Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.490 0.036 470 363 1.570 0.074 0.418 0.563Unmet need for family planning 0.151 0.020 470 363 1.221 0.134 0.110 0.191Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 2.849 0.080 934 714 1.741 0.028 2.689 3.008Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 59.647 13.930 731 582 1.259 0.234 31.788 87.507Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 63.540 13.924 733 582 1.228 0.219 35.693 91.387Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.964 0.013 333 269 1.347 0.014 0.937 0.991Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.735 0.033 333 269 1.355 0.045 0.669 0.801D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.889 0.029 414 334 1.766 0.033 0.830 0.947D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.894 0.027 414 334 1.668 0.031 0.839 0.948DPT-3 dose 0.822 0.068 72 56 1.526 0.083 0.686 0.958Fully immunized 0.570 0.063 72 56 1.084 0.110 0.445 0.696Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.119 0.028 396 312 1.677 0.232 0.064 0.175Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.288 0.058 37 37 0.881 0.202 0.172 0.403Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.285 0.033 345 264 1.304 0.115 0.219 0.351Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.038 0.015 345 264 1.480 0.392 0.008 0.067Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.079 0.018 345 264 1.230 0.229 0.043 0.115Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.387 0.041 351 277 1.546 0.106 0.305 0.469Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.508 0.032 1108 801 2.102 0.062 0.445 0.572Child slept under an ITN last night 0.519 0.043 397 306 1.571 0.084 0.432 0.606Woman slept under ITN last night 0.477 0.037 1005 758 1.963 0.078 0.403 0.551Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.102 0.040 170 136 1.734 0.396 0.021 0.182Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.182 0.036 396 312 1.809 0.198 0.110 0.254Child took antimalarial 0.169 0.084 58 57 1.919 0.498 0.001 0.338Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.667 0.025 952 728 1.624 0.037 0.617 0.716Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.018 0.006 952 728 1.293 0.308 0.007 0.029Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.302 0.038 669 519 2.144 0.126 0.226 0.378Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.242 0.031 448 320 1.551 0.130 0.180 0.305HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.108 0.030 402 287 1.912 0.275 0.049 0.167MENNo education 0.015 0.014 399 314 2.312 0.934 0.000 0.044At least some secondary education 0.781 0.049 399 314 2.362 0.063 0.683 0.879Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.766 0.045 399 314 2.114 0.059 0.676 0.855Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.075 0.017 399 314 1.276 0.225 0.041 0.109Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.407 0.041 335 265 1.534 0.101 0.324 0.489HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.034 0.013 356 297 1.343 0.380 0.008 0.060296 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


Table B.6 Sampling Errors for C<strong>en</strong>tral ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.007 0.002 973 905 0.884 0.335 0.002 0.012At least some secondary education 0.414 0.027 973 905 1.683 0.064 0.361 0.467Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 3.420 0.240 na 2580 1.504 0.070 2.939 3.901Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 4.432 0.186 223 219 1.288 0.042 4.060 4.803Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.667 0.027 565 535 1.339 0.040 0.614 0.720Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.625 0.029 565 535 1.418 0.046 0.568 0.683Unmet need for family planning 0.156 0.020 565 535 1.281 0.126 0.117 0.195Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.081 0.058 959 892 1.535 0.019 2.965 3.197Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 41.836 7.707 998 935 1.153 0.184 26.423 57.249Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 51.127 8.350 999 936 1.161 0.163 34.427 67.826Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.927 0.015 396 371 1.124 0.016 0.898 0.956Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.818 0.021 396 371 1.062 0.025 0.777 0.859D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.738 0.037 496 466 1.678 0.050 0.664 0.812D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.730 0.037 496 466 1.676 0.051 0.656 0.804DPT-3 dose 0.922 0.029 81 74 0.951 0.031 0.865 0.979Fully immunized 0.815 0.054 81 74 1.246 0.067 0.707 0.924Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.144 0.028 460 437 1.651 0.197 0.087 0.201Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.280 0.055 62 63 1.061 0.198 0.169 0.390Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.324 0.036 466 442 1.534 0.111 0.252 0.395Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.049 0.012 466 442 1.154 0.236 0.026 0.072Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.121 0.021 466 442 1.329 0.170 0.080 0.163Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.277 0.030 418 397 1.287 0.107 0.218 0.336Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.327 0.045 1134 1079 3.256 0.139 0.237 0.418Child slept under an ITN last night 0.350 0.052 508 483 2.099 0.149 0.246 0.454Woman slept under ITN last night 0.232 0.042 1026 953 2.831 0.183 0.147 0.317Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.162 0.033 184 168 1.196 0.201 0.097 0.227Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.265 0.024 460 437 1.104 0.090 0.218 0.313Child took antimalarial 0.117 0.032 118 116 1.009 0.276 0.052 0.181Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.578 0.021 973 905 1.297 0.036 0.537 0.619Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.018 0.006 973 905 1.335 0.317 0.007 0.029Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.149 0.017 683 650 1.222 0.112 0.116 0.182Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.361 0.019 587 495 0.962 0.053 0.323 0.399HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.062 0.013 444 405 1.123 0.207 0.036 0.088MENNo education 0.011 0.006 365 347 1.061 0.536 0.000 0.022At least some secondary education 0.430 0.042 365 347 1.629 0.098 0.345 0.514Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.639 0.042 365 347 1.676 0.066 0.555 0.724Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.051 0.012 365 347 1.005 0.227 0.028 0.074Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.412 0.034 251 246 1.101 0.083 0.343 0.480HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.026 0.010 310 329 1.065 0.373 0.007 0.045App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 297


Table B.7 Sampling Errors for Coast ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.243 0.039 1149 674 3.045 0.159 0.166 0.320At least some secondary education 0.284 0.038 1149 674 2.870 0.134 0.208 0.361Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 4.805 0.495 na 1902 1.789 0.103 3.814 5.796Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 5.564 0.424 169 100 1.985 0.076 4.716 6.413Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.343 0.027 718 427 1.540 0.080 0.288 0.398Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.297 0.024 718 427 1.403 0.081 0.249 0.345Unmet need for family planning 0.254 0.019 718 427 1.160 0.074 0.217 0.292Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 4.593 0.306 1080 642 3.558 0.067 3.982 5.205Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 71.088 12.853 1666 965 1.789 0.181 45.383 96.794Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 87.358 14.989 1676 969 1.925 0.172 57.381 117.336Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.945 0.017 590 330 1.812 0.018 0.910 0.980Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.777 0.027 590 330 1.560 0.034 0.723 0.830D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.456 0.039 883 495 1.826 0.085 0.379 0.534D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.444 0.041 883 495 1.921 0.092 0.362 0.525DPT-3 dose 0.867 0.044 155 104 1.735 0.051 0.778 0.956Fully immunized 0.670 0.047 155 104 1.328 0.071 0.575 0.765Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.272 0.037 831 466 2.226 0.136 0.198 0.346Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.418 0.034 190 127 0.949 0.082 0.349 0.487Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.390 0.028 831 485 1.487 0.073 0.334 0.447Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.107 0.019 831 485 1.656 0.178 0.069 0.146Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.235 0.026 831 485 1.487 0.109 0.184 0.286Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.383 0.022 744 425 1.127 0.058 0.339 0.428Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.663 0.042 1212 755 3.117 0.064 0.579 0.748Child slept under an ITN last night 0.569 0.027 865 503 1.240 0.048 0.514 0.623Woman slept under ITN last night 0.493 0.056 1174 709 3.135 0.113 0.382 0.605Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.129 0.031 358 211 1.765 0.243 0.066 0.192Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.350 0.036 831 466 1.968 0.103 0.277 0.422Child took antimalarial 0.203 0.038 291 163 1.467 0.186 0.127 0.278Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.433 0.030 1149 674 2.035 0.069 0.374 0.493Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.025 0.006 1149 674 1.318 0.241 0.013 0.038Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.171 0.020 839 501 1.561 0.119 0.131 0.212Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.284 0.024 671 365 1.382 0.085 0.236 0.332HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.058 0.016 507 284 1.587 0.284 0.025 0.091MENNo education 0.031 0.012 419 252 1.432 0.392 0.007 0.055At least some secondary education 0.494 0.041 419 252 1.672 0.083 0.412 0.576Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.529 0.030 419 252 1.213 0.056 0.470 0.589Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.126 0.034 419 252 2.092 0.270 0.058 0.194Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.315 0.054 320 200 2.064 0.170 0.208 0.423HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.023 0.009 390 231 1.126 0.371 0.006 0.040298 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


Table B.8 Sampling Errors for Eastern ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.057 0.013 1127 1376 1.819 0.220 0.032 0.082At least some secondary education 0.284 0.032 1127 1376 2.352 0.111 0.220 0.347Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 4.444 0.395 na 3883 1.872 0.089 3.655 5.233Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 5.587 0.295 201 238 1.587 0.053 4.997 6.176Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.520 0.034 699 844 1.797 0.065 0.453 0.588Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.438 0.034 699 844 1.798 0.077 0.370 0.505Unmet need for family planning 0.237 0.020 699 844 1.215 0.083 0.197 0.276Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.373 0.098 1089 1338 1.930 0.029 3.177 3.570Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 38.847 7.124 1508 1859 1.346 0.183 24.600 53.094Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 51.876 8.818 1512 1865 1.407 0.170 34.241 69.512Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.934 0.013 522 630 1.201 0.014 0.908 0.961Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.766 0.021 522 630 1.124 0.027 0.724 0.808D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.431 0.044 744 890 2.059 0.101 0.343 0.518D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.428 0.043 744 890 2.035 0.100 0.342 0.514DPT-3 dose 0.917 0.029 149 157 1.182 0.031 0.860 0.975Fully immunized 0.807 0.042 149 157 1.207 0.052 0.723 0.891Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.149 0.021 717 843 1.480 0.139 0.108 0.191Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.294 0.059 90 126 1.296 0.200 0.177 0.412Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.419 0.027 707 881 1.389 0.065 0.365 0.473Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.073 0.010 707 881 1.025 0.139 0.053 0.094Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.198 0.023 707 881 1.376 0.115 0.153 0.243Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.255 0.029 641 752 1.545 0.114 0.197 0.313Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.604 0.025 1237 1512 1.790 0.041 0.554 0.654Child slept under an ITN last night 0.506 0.041 767 928 1.926 0.081 0.424 0.587Woman slept under ITN last night 0.428 0.026 1171 1444 1.682 0.062 0.375 0.481Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.153 0.026 297 334 1.264 0.173 0.100 0.206Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.179 0.027 717 843 1.644 0.149 0.126 0.232Child took antimalarial 0.227 0.079 100 151 2.083 0.346 0.070 0.384Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.463 0.024 1127 1376 1.585 0.051 0.416 0.510Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.005 0.003 1127 1376 1.199 0.503 0.000 0.010Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.127 0.017 796 975 1.479 0.138 0.092 0.162Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.323 0.025 672 702 1.411 0.079 0.272 0.374HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.038 0.010 535 610 1.188 0.257 0.019 0.058MENNo education 0.013 0.006 417 530 0.998 0.422 0.002 0.025At least some secondary education 0.376 0.035 417 530 1.459 0.092 0.306 0.445Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.483 0.032 417 530 1.294 0.066 0.419 0.546Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.049 0.009 417 530 0.870 0.189 0.030 0.067Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.336 0.036 251 310 1.194 0.106 0.265 0.407HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.030 0.012 371 502 1.296 0.381 0.007 0.054App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 299


Table B.9 Sampling Errors for Nyanza ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.021 0.005 1318 1389 1.196 0.226 0.011 0.030At least some secondary education 0.332 0.035 1318 1389 2.675 0.105 0.263 0.402Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 5.365 0.258 na 3831 1.338 0.048 4.850 5.881Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 6.117 0.267 201 218 1.277 0.044 5.582 6.652Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.373 0.025 805 832 1.450 0.066 0.324 0.422Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.329 0.022 805 832 1.333 0.067 0.285 0.373Unmet need for family planning 0.317 0.017 805 832 1.028 0.053 0.283 0.351Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.730 0.065 1262 1335 1.527 0.017 3.599 3.860Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 94.688 8.438 2038 2092 1.183 0.089 77.813 111.564Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 148.854 13.164 2056 2108 1.392 0.088 122.525 175.182Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.936 0.013 719 733 1.421 0.014 0.910 0.963Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.739 0.025 719 733 1.502 0.033 0.690 0.789D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.455 0.029 1109 1145 1.637 0.065 0.396 0.514D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.442 0.029 1109 1145 1.618 0.065 0.384 0.499DPT-3 dose 0.770 0.040 205 203 1.330 0.052 0.689 0.850Fully immunized 0.552 0.043 205 203 1.186 0.077 0.467 0.637Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.162 0.020 999 1024 1.633 0.125 0.122 0.203Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.476 0.061 182 166 1.465 0.127 0.354 0.597Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.309 0.020 961 991 1.228 0.065 0.269 0.349Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.039 0.007 961 991 1.162 0.190 0.024 0.054Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.106 0.013 961 991 1.205 0.122 0.080 0.132Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.358 0.027 886 912 1.537 0.077 0.303 0.413Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.765 0.022 1314 1411 1.875 0.029 0.721 0.809Child slept under an ITN last night 0.609 0.028 1044 1078 1.470 0.045 0.554 0.664Woman slept under ITN last night 0.584 0.025 1368 1456 1.624 0.043 0.534 0.634Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.172 0.023 452 452 1.303 0.135 0.125 0.218Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.243 0.029 999 1024 1.865 0.117 0.186 0.300Child took antimalarial 0.326 0.037 243 249 1.099 0.113 0.253 0.400Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.548 0.019 1318 1389 1.349 0.034 0.511 0.585Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.013 0.004 1318 1389 1.226 0.292 0.006 0.021Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.200 0.015 977 1023 1.150 0.074 0.171 0.230Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.535 0.027 793 774 1.497 0.050 0.482 0.588HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.160 0.021 617 599 1.393 0.129 0.119 0.201MENNo education 0.008 0.004 511 520 1.019 0.508 0.000 0.016At least some secondary education 0.431 0.040 511 520 1.834 0.093 0.351 0.512Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.629 0.023 511 520 1.069 0.036 0.584 0.675Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.159 0.020 511 520 1.232 0.125 0.119 0.199Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.403 0.028 369 370 1.099 0.070 0.347 0.459HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.114 0.018 465 494 1.229 0.159 0.077 0.150300 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


Table B.10 Sampling Errors for Rift Valley ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.122 0.034 1278 2262 3.679 0.276 0.055 0.189At least some secondary education 0.312 0.042 1278 2262 3.236 0.134 0.228 0.396Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 4.663 0.513 na 6291 2.290 0.110 3.637 5.688Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 5.894 0.412 212 388 2.020 0.070 5.069 6.719Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.424 0.034 757 1279 1.884 0.080 0.356 0.491Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.347 0.029 757 1279 1.667 0.083 0.289 0.405Unmet need for family planning 0.311 0.021 757 1279 1.250 0.068 0.269 0.353Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 4.040 0.169 1252 2212 3.058 0.042 3.701 4.379Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 47.834 7.059 2047 3340 1.226 0.148 33.716 61.952Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 58.928 8.406 2054 3357 1.292 0.143 42.117 75.739Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.884 0.022 694 1103 1.750 0.025 0.839 0.929Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.651 0.026 694 1103 1.457 0.041 0.598 0.704D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.337 0.036 1060 1642 1.950 0.106 0.266 0.408D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.329 0.036 1060 1642 1.981 0.109 0.257 0.400DPT-3 dose 0.929 0.021 210 347 1.142 0.022 0.888 0.971Fully immunized 0.729 0.036 210 347 1.124 0.049 0.657 0.801Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.159 0.021 1014 1581 1.625 0.131 0.117 0.200Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.395 0.059 162 251 1.396 0.149 0.277 0.512Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.357 0.022 994 1541 1.274 0.061 0.313 0.400Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.089 0.012 994 1541 1.226 0.137 0.065 0.113Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.191 0.026 994 1541 1.846 0.137 0.139 0.244Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.309 0.025 912 1432 1.314 0.080 0.259 0.358Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.414 0.035 1357 2363 2.616 0.084 0.344 0.484Child slept under an ITN last night 0.295 0.037 1088 1707 2.018 0.126 0.220 0.369Woman slept under ITN last night 0.256 0.028 1326 2361 2.203 0.111 0.199 0.313Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.125 0.026 413 647 1.587 0.207 0.074 0.177Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.209 0.029 1014 1581 1.910 0.136 0.152 0.267Child took antimalarial 0.178 0.041 239 331 1.412 0.231 0.096 0.260Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.435 0.043 1278 2262 3.103 0.099 0.349 0.521Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.006 0.003 1278 2262 1.356 0.481 0.000 0.012Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.205 0.021 898 1577 1.549 0.102 0.163 0.246Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.394 0.032 739 1112 1.773 0.081 0.330 0.458HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.063 0.014 585 976 1.382 0.220 0.036 0.091MENNo education 0.060 0.019 517 885 1.785 0.311 0.023 0.097At least some secondary education 0.441 0.060 517 885 2.757 0.137 0.321 0.562Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.537 0.040 517 885 1.805 0.074 0.457 0.616Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.098 0.015 517 885 1.159 0.155 0.068 0.129Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.299 0.034 397 668 1.485 0.114 0.231 0.368HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.028 0.011 462 818 1.411 0.385 0.007 0.050App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 301


Table B.11 Sampling Errors for Western ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.041 0.010 1039 927 1.618 0.243 0.021 0.061At least some secondary education 0.280 0.028 1039 927 2.025 0.101 0.223 0.336Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 5.565 0.313 na 2552 1.409 0.056 4.939 6.191Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 6.611 0.308 181 167 1.615 0.047 5.996 7.226Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.465 0.028 603 518 1.380 0.060 0.409 0.521Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.411 0.026 603 518 1.310 0.064 0.359 0.464Unmet need for family planning 0.258 0.021 603 518 1.163 0.080 0.217 0.300Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 3.910 0.066 1023 913 1.285 0.017 3.777 4.042Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 65.189 12.275 1507 1354 1.792 0.188 40.639 89.740Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 121.353 19.189 1521 1365 2.079 0.158 82.976 159.731Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.915 0.019 514 442 1.506 0.021 0.877 0.953Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.722 0.024 514 442 1.211 0.033 0.675 0.770D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.258 0.031 790 703 1.721 0.120 0.196 0.320D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.253 0.030 790 703 1.702 0.120 0.193 0.314DPT-3 dose 0.815 0.052 153 129 1.594 0.063 0.712 0.918Fully immunized 0.644 0.076 153 129 1.884 0.118 0.492 0.795Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.172 0.020 741 653 1.299 0.117 0.132 0.212Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.356 0.072 140 113 1.397 0.202 0.212 0.500Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.342 0.030 820 733 1.675 0.087 0.283 0.402Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.023 0.009 820 733 1.515 0.383 0.005 0.041Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.118 0.021 820 733 1.649 0.179 0.076 0.160Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.198 0.018 672 605 1.163 0.089 0.162 0.233Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.714 0.024 1061 937 1.728 0.034 0.666 0.762Child slept under an ITN last night 0.554 0.027 847 768 1.268 0.048 0.500 0.607Woman slept under ITN last night 0.542 0.040 1070 974 2.274 0.073 0.463 0.621Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.129 0.031 301 254 1.583 0.237 0.068 0.190Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.301 0.026 741 653 1.372 0.087 0.248 0.354Child took antimalarial 0.321 0.043 222 197 1.258 0.134 0.235 0.407Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.458 0.022 1039 927 1.413 0.048 0.414 0.501Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.015 0.004 1039 927 1.184 0.298 0.006 0.024Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.146 0.022 716 608 1.633 0.148 0.103 0.189Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.493 0.032 576 458 1.512 0.064 0.430 0.556HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.092 0.014 486 394 1.095 0.156 0.063 0.121MENNo education 0.017 0.008 429 349 1.257 0.459 0.001 0.033At least some secondary education 0.317 0.029 429 349 1.282 0.091 0.260 0.375Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.453 0.036 429 349 1.509 0.080 0.381 0.526Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.088 0.017 429 349 1.241 0.193 0.054 0.123Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.421 0.035 292 229 1.226 0.084 0.350 0.492HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.034 0.011 395 334 1.183 0.315 0.013 0.056302 | App<strong>en</strong>dix B


Table B.12 Sampling Errors for North Eastern ProvinceVariable R SE N-UNWE N-WEIG DEFT SE/R R-2SE R+2SEWOMENNo education 0.777 0.029 608 184 1.699 0.037 0.719 0.834At least some secondary education 0.082 0.021 608 184 1.845 0.250 0.041 0.123Total fertility rate (last 3 years) 5.920 0.421 na 513 1.526 0.071 5.077 6.762Childr<strong>en</strong> ever born to wom<strong>en</strong> age 40-49 6.651 0.313 93 26 1.027 0.047 6.024 7.278Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using any contraceptive method 0.035 0.016 424 130 1.857 0.478 0.002 0.067Curr<strong>en</strong>tly using a modern method 0.035 0.016 424 130 1.857 0.478 0.002 0.067Unmet need for family planning 0.160 0.027 424 130 1.498 0.167 0.107 0.213Ideal number of childr<strong>en</strong> 8.754 0.276 312 92 1.322 0.032 8.201 9.307Infant mortality rate (last 10 years) 57.060 11.251 1102 338 1.424 0.197 34.558 79.562Under five mortality rate (last 10 years) 79.875 15.670 1111 341 1.606 0.196 48.535 111.216Ant<strong>en</strong>atal care from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.695 0.076 314 97 2.938 0.109 0.544 0.847Birth protected against neonatal tetanus 0.631 0.047 314 97 1.707 0.074 0.538 0.724D<strong>el</strong>ivery assistance from doctor, nurse, midwife 0.316 0.061 583 178 2.295 0.194 0.193 0.439D<strong>el</strong>ivery in health facility 0.173 0.043 583 178 1.941 0.247 0.088 0.259DPT-3 dose 0.571 0.099 94 27 1.871 0.174 0.373 0.769Fully immunized 0.474 0.089 94 27 1.661 0.188 0.296 0.652Had diarrhoea in two weeks before survey 0.160 0.024 548 166 1.607 0.153 0.111 0.209Treated with oral rehydration salts (ORS) 0.621 0.087 83 27 1.579 0.139 0.448 0.794Height-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.352 0.030 439 133 1.286 0.085 0.292 0.412Weight-for-height (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.195 0.026 439 133 1.304 0.135 0.143 0.248Weight-for-age (b<strong>el</strong>ow -2 SD) 0.245 0.019 439 133 0.856 0.080 0.206 0.284Vitamin A supplem<strong>en</strong>t 0.256 0.036 487 147 1.634 0.139 0.185 0.327Owns at least 1 insecticide-treated net (ITN) 0.733 0.029 634 199 1.640 0.039 0.675 0.790Child slept under an ITN last night 0.627 0.051 582 181 1.876 0.081 0.525 0.728Woman slept under ITN last night 0.527 0.039 627 195 1.727 0.075 0.448 0.606Received 2+ doses of SP/Fansidar ant<strong>en</strong>atal visit 0.100 0.033 198 62 1.543 0.330 0.034 0.166Child has fever in last 2 weeks 0.234 0.024 548 166 1.302 0.102 0.187 0.282Child took antimalarial 0.204 0.039 114 39 1.037 0.192 0.126 0.282Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.051 0.012 608 184 1.318 0.232 0.027 0.074Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.000 0.000 608 184 na na 0.000 0.000Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.000 0.000 417 128 na na 0.000 0.000Ever have physical/sexual viol<strong>en</strong>ce by husband 0.327 0.070 420 110 3.054 0.214 0.187 0.466HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.009 0.007 235 86 1.070 0.727 0.000 0.023MENNo education 0.412 0.056 199 62 1.608 0.137 0.299 0.524At least some secondary education 0.253 0.046 199 62 1.481 0.181 0.162 0.345Has compreh<strong>en</strong>sive knowledge of HIV/AIDS 0.125 0.029 199 62 1.249 0.235 0.066 0.184Multiple sexual partners in last 12 months 0.072 0.023 199 62 1.246 0.317 0.026 0.118Sex with non-marital partner in last 12 months 0.047 0.022 114 36 1.104 0.468 0.003 0.091HIV preval<strong>en</strong>ce rate 15-49 0.009 0.009 158 63 1.207 0.999 0.000 0.028App<strong>en</strong>dix B | 303


DATA QUALITYApp<strong>en</strong>dix CTable C.1 Household age distributionSingle-year age distribution of the de facto household population by sex (weighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09AgeWom<strong>en</strong>M<strong>en</strong>Wom<strong>en</strong>Number Perc<strong>en</strong>t Number Perc<strong>en</strong>t Age Number Perc<strong>en</strong>t Number Perc<strong>en</strong>t0 563.6 2.9 652.4 3.5 37 135.8 0.7 115.5 0.61 552.0 2.8 554.3 3.0 38 205.7 1.1 184.6 1.02 590.1 3.0 666.9 3.6 39 154.7 0.8 120.4 0.73 612.8 3.1 587.9 3.2 40 232.5 1.2 285.3 1.54 593.7 3.0 601.2 3.2 41 126.4 0.6 101.2 0.55 542.5 2.8 558.7 3.0 42 140.9 0.7 137.2 0.76 657.2 3.4 700.3 3.8 43 134.3 0.7 129.7 0.77 482.0 2.5 531.2 2.9 44 156.5 0.8 120.6 0.78 622.7 3.2 687.7 3.7 45 199.5 1.0 216.6 1.29 480.3 2.5 534.2 2.9 46 144.3 0.7 150.6 0.810 624.0 3.2 614.3 3.3 47 111.8 0.6 69.2 0.411 467.0 2.4 415.8 2.2 48 121.9 0.6 93.6 0.512 607.4 3.1 555.1 3.0 49 119.2 0.6 99.0 0.513 491.4 2.5 447.0 2.4 50 177.3 0.9 178.6 1.014 490.7 2.5 524.8 2.8 51 120.9 0.6 37.1 0.215 361.3 1.9 358.7 1.9 52 125.2 0.6 89.6 0.516 441.3 2.3 453.8 2.5 53 83.7 0.4 78.5 0.417 349.3 1.8 332.9 1.8 54 117.7 0.6 92.0 0.518 397.7 2.0 465.9 2.5 55 129.1 0.7 96.3 0.519 312.8 1.6 341.1 1.8 56 134.2 0.7 104.2 0.620 440.8 2.3 339.7 1.8 57 35.7 0.2 62.6 0.321 315.7 1.6 281.7 1.5 58 96.1 0.5 59.9 0.322 399.1 2.0 326.0 1.8 59 44.4 0.2 55.1 0.323 291.3 1.5 266.3 1.4 60 159.6 0.8 148.0 0.824 358.9 1.8 258.1 1.4 61 43.4 0.2 44.4 0.225 331.6 1.7 295.3 1.6 62 55.3 0.3 71.5 0.426 271.6 1.4 263.0 1.4 63 60.5 0.3 44.1 0.227 274.2 1.4 208.4 1.1 64 61.5 0.3 39.1 0.228 361.0 1.8 263.2 1.4 65 87.7 0.4 65.9 0.429 290.1 1.5 196.0 1.1 66 47.5 0.2 37.2 0.230 379.7 1.9 340.3 1.8 67 36.2 0.2 34.9 0.231 143.1 0.7 163.2 0.9 68 51.7 0.3 48.3 0.332 249.6 1.3 228.5 1.2 69 43.1 0.2 38.1 0.233 219.7 1.1 141.1 0.8 70+ 561.6 2.9 453.9 2.534 240.0 1.2 194.2 1.0 Don’t know/35 242.9 1.2 255.4 1.4 missing 17.2 0.1 8.7 0.036 193.6 1.0 187.0 1.0Total 19,516 100.0 18,503 100.0Note: The de facto population includes all resid<strong>en</strong>ts and nonresid<strong>en</strong>ts who stayed in the household the night before interview.M<strong>en</strong>App<strong>en</strong>dix C | 305


Table C.2.1 Age distribution of <strong>el</strong>igible and interviewed wom<strong>en</strong>De facto household population of wom<strong>en</strong> age 10-54, interviewedwom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49, and perc<strong>en</strong>tage of <strong>el</strong>igible wom<strong>en</strong> who wereinterviewed (weighted), by five-year age groups, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age groupHouseholdpopulation ofwom<strong>en</strong> age10-54Interviewed wom<strong>en</strong>age 15-49Number Perc<strong>en</strong>tPerc<strong>en</strong>t ofwom<strong>en</strong>10-14 2,681 na na na15-19 1,862 1,781 20.8 95.620-24 1,806 1,756 20.5 97.225-29 1,529 1,485 17.4 97.230-34 1,232 1,193 14.0 96.825-39 933 902 10.6 96.740-44 791 758 8.9 95.845-49 697 672 7.9 96.450-54 625 na na na15-49 8,849 8,545 100.0 96.6Table C.2.2 Age distribution of <strong>el</strong>igible and interviewed m<strong>en</strong>De facto household population of m<strong>en</strong> aged 10-59, interviewed m<strong>en</strong>aged 15-54 and perc<strong>en</strong>t of <strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong> who were interviewed(weighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age groupHouseholdpopulationof m<strong>en</strong> age10-59Interviewed m<strong>en</strong>age 15-54Number Perc<strong>en</strong>tPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of<strong>el</strong>igible m<strong>en</strong>interviewed10-14 1,330 na na na15-19 894 817 22.7 91.420-24 704 629 17.5 89.425-29 589 513 14.3 87.230-34 564 485 13.5 86.125-39 434 370 10.3 85.340-44 319 296 8.2 92.745-49 325 290 8.1 89.450-54 221 194 5.4 87.955-59 185 na na na15-54 4,049 3,595 100.0 84.9306 | App<strong>en</strong>dix C


Table C.3 Complet<strong>en</strong>ess of reportingPerc<strong>en</strong>tage of observations missing information for s<strong>el</strong>ected demographic and health questions (weighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09SubjectRefer<strong>en</strong>ce groupPerc<strong>en</strong>tagewith missinginformationNumberof casesBirth date Births in the 15 years preceding the surveyMonth only 1.70 15,911Month and year 0.13 15,911Age at death Deceased childr<strong>en</strong> born in the 15 years preceding the survey 0.11 1,312Age/date at first union 1 Ever-married wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 0.48 5,810Ever-married m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 0.42 1,941Respond<strong>en</strong>t’s education All wom<strong>en</strong> age 15-49 0.00 8,444All m<strong>en</strong> age 15-54 0.03 3,465Diarrhoea in last 2 weeks Living childr<strong>en</strong> age 0-59 months 1.45 5,481Anthropometry Living childr<strong>en</strong> age 0-59 (from the Household Questionnaire)Height 3.23 5,932Weight 2.84 5,932Height or weight 3.35 5,9321Both year and age missingTable C.4 Births by cal<strong>en</strong>dar yearsNumber of births, perc<strong>en</strong>tage with complete birth date, sex ratio at birth, and cal<strong>en</strong>dar year ratio by cal<strong>en</strong>dar year, according to living, dead,and total childr<strong>en</strong> (weighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Cal<strong>en</strong>dar yearNumber of birthsPerc<strong>en</strong>tage withcomplete birth date Sex ratio at birth Cal<strong>en</strong>dar year ratioLiving Dead Total Living Dead Total Living Dead Total Living Dead Total2009 60 6 67 100.0 100.0 100.0 109.7 298.3 119.8 na na na2008 1,137 44 1,181 99.9 100.0 100.0 116.2 209.9 118.7 na na na2007 1,085 80 1,164 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.7 119.1 101.8 95.6 117.5 96.92006 1,132 91 1,223 100.0 100.0 100.0 107.6 126.9 108.9 105.1 121.7 106.12005 1,070 70 1,140 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.1 127.5 98.7 98.1 81.0 96.92004 1,048 83 1,131 100.0 100.0 100.0 109.1 129.8 110.4 102.2 123.3 103.52003 982 64 1,045 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.6 121.3 98.9 86.3 62.4 84.32002 1,226 121 1,347 97.2 92.7 96.8 103.7 120.5 105.1 131.6 156.9 133.62001 882 91 972 97.1 94.5 96.8 110.2 79.7 106.9 76.5 72.0 76.02000 1,080 131 1,211 97.6 96.4 97.5 95.8 135.5 99.4 120.7 141.3 122.60-4 4,483 292 4,776 100.0 100.0 100.0 105.4 136.6 107.1 na na na5-9 5,218 489 5,707 98.3 96.2 98.2 102.9 116.7 104.0 na na na10-14 4,175 464 4,639 96.7 95.7 96.6 95.3 104.4 96.2 na na na15-19 3,087 345 3,431 97.1 91.0 96.4 100.5 128.0 102.9 na na na20+ 3,535 517 4,052 96.6 92.2 96.0 106.0 141.1 109.9 na na naAll 20,498 2,106 22,605 97.9 94.8 97.6 102.0 123.7 103.9 na na naApp<strong>en</strong>dix C | 307


Table C.5 Reporting of age at death in daysDistribution of reported deaths under one month of age by age at death indays and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of neonatal deaths reported to occur at ages 0-6days, for five-year periods of birth preceding the survey (weighted), K<strong>en</strong>ya2008-09Age at death(days)Number of years preceding the survey0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19Total0-19


Table C.6 Reporting of age at death in monthsDistribution of reported deaths under two years of age by age at deathin months and the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of infant deaths reported to occur at ageunder one month, for five-year periods of birth preceding the survey,K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-09Age at death(months)Number of yearspreceding the survey0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19Total0-19


Table C.7 Nutritional status of childr<strong>en</strong>Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of childr<strong>en</strong> under five years classified as malnourished according to three anthropometric indices of nutritional status: height-for-age, weight-forheight,and weight-for-age, by background characteristics, K<strong>en</strong>ya 2008-2009BackgroundcharacteristicMeanHeight-for-age Weight-for-height Weight-for-agePerc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Mean Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage Perc<strong>en</strong>tage-3 SD -2 SD 1 (SD) -3 SD -2 SD 1 +2 SD (SD) -3 SD -2 SD 1 +2 SDb<strong>el</strong>ow b<strong>el</strong>ow Z-score b<strong>el</strong>ow b<strong>el</strong>ow above Z-score b<strong>el</strong>ow b<strong>el</strong>ow aboveMeanZ-score(SD)Age in months


LIST OF 2008-09 KDHS PARTICIPANTSApp<strong>en</strong>dix DSURVEY COORDINATORSAntony K.M. Kil<strong>el</strong>eDr. Collins OpiyoChristopher NdayaraAbdulkadir Amin AwesRobert C.B. BulumaGeorge Alusa KichamuLydia W. KarimurioMacdonald G. ObudhoMicha<strong>el</strong> MusyokaSamu<strong>el</strong> A. OgolaDiana S.M. KamarMary M. WanyonyiSteph<strong>en</strong> N. NyoikeVane LumumbaDavid M. MuthamiRose M. MainaJared Masini IchwaraGladys MbalukuJohn Gitau MburuRobert K. NderituSURVEY TEAMS(RA = Research Assistant)English 1Supervisor:EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechWnza MuthembwaDiana WangareRosemary ObiloGladys Ng’<strong>en</strong>oLydia NyamokamiCharles KonganiFaith A. OgolahLydia Mud<strong>en</strong>yoFayo GalgaloEnglish 3Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechMoses Ok<strong>el</strong>oH<strong>el</strong>l<strong>en</strong> KimanthiJanet WambuaEverlyn M. MartinAgnes N. MachariaGichuhi R. MainaSororo H. GuyoMargaret MbuviSwalehe A. Mwat<strong>en</strong>doEnglish 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechGeorge OdipoHawa H. IbrahimPauline M. MutuaFatuma M. GaratLillian KayaroCederick Indeche SoreLorna A. OkatchAbdi RobaHalimatawane AbdiSomali 1Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechShukri A. HusseinMulki SalatFatma IbrahimRalia BiduHassan M. DaudDahabo A. IbrahimHabiba AliJililo Abdul ShikoAbukar DugowApp<strong>en</strong>dix D | 311


Somali 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechAlex MulewaRukia A. SheikhRukia A. BulleFatuma A. BulaleAnab M. GureAbdikharim MohammedFatuma BashirAbdirahman AbdullahiFatuma Abdi MohamudMiji K<strong>en</strong>da 1Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechRodgers KazunguGrace Bahati KainguCharity NingalaLiz TingaRose KazunguFrancis RuwaEsha A. KunyugaDisckson K<strong>en</strong>gaAthur Joha BayaMeruSupervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechKambaSupervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechDickson Makuba/Gladys KithinjiPhyllis NjeriJanet NankuiCar<strong>en</strong> W. MugambiJanerose MugiiraAlfred MwangiGladys K. KithinjiJapheth M. NjeruEliud Njau MbaiLucia MulwaAng<strong>el</strong>a KatataAgnes MwikaliPauline MutisyaPurity NyamaiSimon NguliVirginia Mu<strong>en</strong>doMargaret M. NzumbiWambua MwikyaMiji K<strong>en</strong>da 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechKal<strong>en</strong>jin 1Supervisor:RA (F)EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechJames MungutiKadzo MumbaIr<strong>en</strong>e F. MwaringaFlor<strong>en</strong>ce MwatsumaWinnie SababuGilbert MwandejeJudy E. MremaElija MtuanaSwalha Ali HusseinChristopher Yator/Milcah LettingSt<strong>el</strong>la BiiMilcah LettingJuliet JepkosgeiLyndah JepchirchirEdward ChemeiJackline ChepkoechLeah BaswonyMagdal<strong>en</strong>e MorogoEmbuSupervisor:RA (F)RA (F)EDITORRA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechPatrick NdivoElizabeth MukamiGladys R. MbogoMaryrose NyakioJudith Wanjiku KiamaJoseph N. NyamburanoLeah Mbesa YulaFredrick N. GichoniDancan N. NgariKal<strong>en</strong>jin 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechWilson Sang’Caroline Jepng’etichCaroline KoimaJanet MiningwoBeatrice MugunJacob MaiyoMarion KiprotichJanet SetlugetPhilip K. SangSwahiliSupervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechWilly KondeGladness MatildaElizabeth MwatatiMaria MrundeCatherine M. NdoloMunir A. MasoudD<strong>en</strong>d<strong>el</strong>eon OmwanzaAli Salim AliJeremiah BaqataMaasaiSupervisor:EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechRonald MathookoAnne Sek<strong>en</strong>toJosephine NasiekuJa<strong>el</strong> Soila Shi<strong>en</strong>iMonica NchokoWilliam K. SipaiMagdaline NashoruaSaida OsmanJosephat Kaloi312 | App<strong>en</strong>dix D


Kikuyu 1Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechPeter K. KamauAlice MwangiRosalid W. MuraguriChristine MuriithiCynthia WangechiStanley G. GitauIr<strong>en</strong>e GachuiriLucy W. TamooSamu<strong>el</strong> KimitiKisiiSupervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)EDITORRA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechPeter OchileKemunto SusanSophia KeruboJanet MaseseAnn N. OngeraBernard OnkwarePeris N. NyagakaGrace OrinaMeshack MigetaKikuyu 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)EditorLab TechLab TechEunice MainaRosemary WanjiruGitonga Dinah WanjaJoan Mumbi GichukiMercy NyamburaPeter N. GichohiBeatrice W. MainaCharity MungaiGeorge K. NjorogeLuhya 1Supervisor:RA (F)EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechGeorge OndanjeEMILY LIHABIBr<strong>en</strong>da AshandaZaynab M. OlumJosephine M. NgayuaMuyanda HarunFrascisca WitabaDavies MukolweLinnet MunyasiaKikuyu 3Supervisor:EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechRufus Kihara DavidNancy Njeri WanjikuCaroline WangareRuth Watetu NdirituTabitha N. WambuguEliud Maina KuriaAnastasia G. MatuGeoffrey KimaniPhylis W. KaririLuhya 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechChepto Johana KiprotichSarah SimiyuPatricia AkangaPam<strong>el</strong>a LuvandalePatricia WakhasiakaVictor MilimoEverlyn AkosePapa BarasaLydia OdedaLuo 1Supervisor:EditorRA (F)RA (F)RA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechCarolyne OmbokHilda AkinyiAlice WajewaJackline A. OwagaMary J. Ati<strong>en</strong>oDan C.O. ObonyoPerez OchwalPatrick Oti<strong>en</strong>oWambura K<strong>en</strong>nedyLuhya 3Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechP.T.A. GondiLucy K. MadahanaMary KavosaSylivia KalehaEv<strong>el</strong>yne MuyomaEddy M. OrumaGladys KituiMargaret MalahoDerick KamadiLuo 2Supervisor:RA (F)RA (F)EditorRA (F)RA (M)RA (F)Lab TechLab TechGodfrey Oti<strong>en</strong>oFlor<strong>en</strong>ce AdhiamboMolly A. Ochi<strong>en</strong>gMaure<strong>en</strong> A. Ochi<strong>en</strong>gPauline ObungaGeorge OmondiMaure<strong>en</strong> A. OluochTobias OketchAmanda ChristineApp<strong>en</strong>dix D | 313


HEALTH WORKERS ON STANDBYElijah Michemi NjeruMukolwe S. MunalahLeah BaswonyFranklin Kyuli KithekaGOVERNMENT DRIVERSJoseph MbuguaOmwega W. NyegaBaya Jefa ChaiZacharia K. AtuyaChidziph BesadaJackson M. MurungiErnest W. OjoroWilson KandieWilson LangatDavid ThiongoZacharia K. AtuyaStanly Kipkemoi KorirWilson KandieFrancis MugambiBoniface SalatonCyrus KamauAugustine NgatiaJoseph K. BartaiJosephat Mulira ElakiAnthony G. KiraguJohn Peter O. AbbottSamson N. MungaiSteph<strong>en</strong> Munyao KioliDRIVERS FROM HIRED FIRMStanley Nj<strong>en</strong>gaRobert ChegeAnthony KangetheK<strong>en</strong> MugoDavid MwangiPatrick Nj<strong>en</strong>gaJames MungaiIsma<strong>el</strong> NdunguTiman WamaeBonfrey WallaSteph<strong>en</strong> MbuguaJeremiah NgaruiyaAlex KithuiJohn KanyiLawr<strong>en</strong>ce Ng’ang’aCOORDINATORS FOR BLOOD ANALYSISJames MuttungaMamo Umuro314 | App<strong>en</strong>dix D


BLOOD SAMPLE ANALYSIS TEAMJoseph OderaMrs. Alice Sifuma NgoniJudy Wambui ChegeLilian Nduku ItuaSophie MwanyumbaDavid NjoguNancy J. LagatCatherine GichimuJames GikundaSafia AdamThomas GachukiLucy KanyaraSteph<strong>en</strong> KipkerichIsaac BayaBLOOD SAMPLE DATA SPECIALISTS1. Titus K. Ngetich2. Hussein AbdiVCT COUNSELLORSNixon Teka NakukuLilian Wangeci MumbiOgw<strong>en</strong>o Timothy K<strong>en</strong>thPeter Olboo SaitotiAziza KarimiRos<strong>el</strong>yne CherukutLee M. MatingiJudith AmbokaPeter J.G. NdegeMary IsalambahKahindi Kazungu RuwaJanice Ntarara IkuiOljartan Nalama SolomonTheresia K. KitemaAgnes Mbaika NzukiVorster K<strong>en</strong>ga MugomoloMargaret EndereAbdi Adow Ad<strong>en</strong>Chatherine Nyawira MuchiraKar<strong>en</strong> V.A. OwuorApp<strong>en</strong>dix D | 315


TWG-MEMBERSCarol NgareMamo UmoroJames MuttungaJoshua GitongaDr. Patrick MureithiJohn WanyunguSusan KiraguChristopher OmoloRobert C.B. BulumaNjoroge NyoikeGeorge KichamuSamu<strong>el</strong> OgolaMicha<strong>el</strong> MusyokaMacdonald ObudhoWashingon OmwomoDiana KamarLydia KarimurioPatricia NgariB<strong>en</strong> ObonyoZipporah W. GathitiLynn AdrianOw<strong>en</strong> KoimburiAhmed AbadeDr. Ayub ManyaVane LumumbaSTEERING COMMITTEEProf. Alloys S.S. OragoDr. Erasmus MorahA.K.M. Kil<strong>el</strong>eDr. Nicholus MuraguriDr. Ibrahim MohammedDr. Solomon MpokeDr. Jane WasikeSURVEY DATA ENTRY CLERKSAnn MwanikiDavid OnyangoShem NzukiLydia KaleeWinfred GithinjiAnastacia KiokoDorcas KateeGrace MukiraPriscilla Mu<strong>en</strong>iFaith KinyuaSusan MungaiEdwin OdhiamboRogers M. KingaiDomitilla KivuvoEsther KinyanjuiRedempter MuyumaMisheck N. GathitiGeorge Asugo OmondiDani<strong>el</strong> Mutembei316 | App<strong>en</strong>dix D


SURVEY DATA EDITORSSupervisor: Fridah KatuaPius NdubiJanet LunayoDavid AchayoSolomon KimumaDorcas OdiraNancy KosgeySupervisor/System Dev<strong>el</strong>opersPaul WaweruBernard D. ObasiSamu<strong>el</strong> KiprutoQUALITY ASSURANCEMark WekesaDore<strong>en</strong> NdukuLuke Njagi MuranoAlice Auma Ati<strong>en</strong>oFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT TEAMOw<strong>en</strong> KoimburiGodfrey KamauFaith GichagiFaith MumbuaICF MACROAnne CrossJeanne CushingJoy Fish<strong>el</strong>Alfredo AliagaAvril ArmstrongDean GarrettNancy JohnsonChristopher GramerSri PoedjastoetiApp<strong>en</strong>dix D | 317


QUESTIONNAIRESApp<strong>en</strong>dix EApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 319


Serial number______________CONFIDENTIALKENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICSKENYA DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY 2008HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIREIDENTIFICATIONPROVINCE*DISTRICTLOCATION/TOWNSUBLOCATION/WARDNASSEP CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .KDHS CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HOUSEHOLD NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAIROBI/MOMBASA/KISUMU=1; NAKURU/ELDORET/THIKA/NYERI=2;SMALL TOWN=3; RURAL=4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME OF HOUSEHOLD HEADIS HOUSEHOLD SELECTED FOR MAN'S SURVEY? (YES=1; NO=2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .INTERVIEWER VISITS1 2 3FINAL VISITDAYDATEMONTHYEAR200INTERVIEWER'S NAMEINT. CODERESULT**FINAL RESULTNEXT VISIT:DATETIMETOTAL NUMBEROF VISITS**RESULT CODES:1 COMPLETED TOTAL PERSONS2 NO HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AT HOME OR NO COMPETENT RESPONDENT HOME AT IN HOUSEHOLDTIME OF VISIT3 ENTIRE HOUSEHOLD ABSENT FOR EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME TOTAL ELIGIBLE4 POSTPONED WOMEN5 REFUSED6 DWELLING VACANT OR ADDRESS NOT A DWELLING TOTAL ELIGIBLE7 DWELLING DESTROYED MEN8 DWELLING NOT FOUND9 OTHER(SPECIFY)LINE NO. OFRESPONDENTTO HH QUESTION.ENGLISHNAMESUPERVISORNAMEFIELD EDITOROFFICEEDITORKEYED BYDATEDATE* Province: NAIROBI=1; CENTRAL=2; COAST=3; EASTERN=4; NYANZA=5; R.VALLEY=6; WESTERN=7; NORTHEASTERN=8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 321


INTRODUCTION AND CONSENTH<strong>el</strong>lo. My name is ________ and I am working with the K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics. We are conducting a national surveythat asks about various health issues. We would very much appreciate your participation in this survey.This information will h<strong>el</strong>p the governm<strong>en</strong>t to plan health services. The survey usually takes betwe<strong>en</strong> 30 to 60 minutes to complete.Whatever information you provide will be kept confid<strong>en</strong>tial and will not be shared with anyone other than members of our survey team.Participation in this survey is voluntary, and if we should come to any question you don't want to answer, just let me know andI will go on to the next question; or you can stop the interview at any time. However, we hope that you will participate in thissurvey since your views are important.At this time, do you want to ask me anything about the survey?May I begin the interview now?Signature of interviewer:Date:RESPONDENT AGREES TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . 1 RESPONDENT DOES NOT AGREE TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . 2 END322 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


HOUSEHOLD SCHEDULENow we would like some information about the people who usually live in your household or who are staying with you now.IF AGE 15OR OLDERLINE USUAL RESIDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP SEX RESIDENCE AGE MARITALNO.VISITORSTO HEAD OFSTATUSHOUSEHOLDELIGIBILITYPlease give me the names What is the Is Does Did How What is CIRCLE CIRCLE CIRCLEof the persons who usually r<strong>el</strong>ationship of (NAME) (NAME) (NAME) old is (NAME'S) LINE LINE LINElive in your household and (NAME) to the male or usually stay (NAME)? curr<strong>en</strong>t NUMBER NUMBER NUMBERguests of the household head of the female? live here marital OF ALL OF ALL OF ALLwho stayed here last night, household? here? last status? WOMEN CHILD- MENstarting with the head of night? AGE REN AGEthe household. SEE CODES 1 = MARRIED 15-49 AGE 0-5 15 - 54BELOW.OR LIVINGAFTER LISTING THE TOGETHER * LINE NO.NAMES AND RECORDING 2 = DIVOR- OFTHE RELATIONSHIP CED/ WOMANAND SEX FOR EACH SEPARATED SEL-PERSON, ASK 3 = WIDOWED ECTEDQUESTIONS 2A-2C 4 = NEVER- FOR Qs.TO BE SURE THAT THE MARRIED ONLISTING IS COMPLETE. AND DOM-NEVER ESTICTHEN ASK APPROPRIATE LIVED VIO-QUESTIONS IN COLUMNS TOGETHER LENCE.5-33 FOR EACH PERSON.(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)(9) (10) (11)M F Y N Y N IN YEARS01 1 2 1 2 1 2 01 01 0102 1 2 1 2 1 2 02 02 0203 1 2 1 2 1 2 03 03 0304 1 2 1 2 1 2 04 04 0405 1 2 1 2 1 2 05 05 0506 1 2 1 2 1 2 06 06 0607 1 2 1 2 1 2 07 07 0708 1 2 1 2 1 2 08 08 0809 1 2 1 2 1 2 09 09 0910 1 2 1 2 1 2 10 10 10CODES FOR Q. 3: RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD2A) Just to make sure that I have a complete 01 = HEAD 08 = BROTHER OR SISTERlisting. Are there any other persons such as small ADD TO02 = WIFE OR HUSBAND 09 = NIECE/NEPHEW BY BLOODchildr<strong>en</strong> or infants that we have not listed? YES TABLE NO 03 = SON OR DAUGHTER 10 = NIECE/NEPHEW BY MARRIAGE2B) Are there any other people who may not be 04 = SON-IN-LAW OR 11 = OTHER RELATIVEmembers of your family, such as domestic ADD TODAUGHTER-IN-LAW 12 = ADOPTED/FOSTER/servants, lodgers, or fri<strong>en</strong>ds who usually live hereYES TABLE NO 05 = GRANDCHILD STEPCHILD2C) Are there any guests or temporary visitors 06 = PARENT 13 = NOT RELATEDstaying here, or anyone <strong>el</strong>se who stayed here last ADD TO07 = PARENT-IN-LAW 98 = DON'T KNOWnight, who have not be<strong>en</strong> listed? YES TABLE NOApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 323


IF AGE 4 YEARSOR OLDERIF AGE 4-24 YEARSIF AGE 0-4 YEARSLINE EVER ATTENDED CURRENT/RECENT SCHOOL ATTENDANCENO.SCHOOLBIRTH REGISTRATIONHas What is the Did During the 2008 Did During the 2007 Has (NAME) Why was(NAME) highest lev<strong>el</strong> of (NAME) school year, (NAME) school year, ever be<strong>en</strong> registered (NAME)ever school (NAME) att<strong>en</strong>d what lev<strong>el</strong> and att<strong>en</strong>d what with the never?att<strong>en</strong>ded has att<strong>en</strong>ded? school grade is/was school lev<strong>el</strong> and grade civil authority? registeredschool? at any (NAME) at any did (NAME)SEE CODES time att<strong>en</strong>ding? time att<strong>en</strong>d? 1 = YES, 1=TOO FARBELOW. during during REGISTEREDthe SEE CODES the SEE CODES WITH BIRTH 2=LITTLE MONEYWhat is the 2008 BELOW. 2007 BELOW. CERTIFICATEhighest grade school school 2 = YES, 3=NOT AWARE(NAME) year? year? REGISTEREDcompleted WITHOUT BIRTH 4=NOT NECESARYat that lev<strong>el</strong>?CERTIFICATE5=NOMADIC LIFESEE CODES 8 = DON'T KNOW DIFFICULTBELOW.TERRAIN3 = NOT INSECURITYREGISTERED8=OTHER(23) (24)(25) (26)(27)(28)(32)(33)Y N LEVEL GRADE Y N LEVEL GRADE Y N LEVEL GRADE Y Y DK NO01 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3302 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3303 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3304 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3305 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3306 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3307 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3308 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3309 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3310 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINE TO 33CODES FOR Qs. 24, 26, AND 28: EDUCATIONLEVELGRADE0= NURSERY/KINDERGARTEN 00 = LESS THAN 1 YEAR COMPLETED1 = PRIMARY (USE '00' FOR Q. 24 ONLY.2= POST-PRIMARY, VOCATIONAL THIS CODE IS NOT ALLOWED3 = SECONDARY, A LEVEL FOR QS. 26 AND 28)4 = COLLEGE (MIDDLE LEVEL)5= UNIVERSITY 98 = DON'T KNOW8 = DON'T KNOW324 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


IF AGE 15OR OLDERLINE USUAL RESIDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP SEX RESIDENCE AGE MARITALNO.VISITORSTO HEAD OFSTATUSHOUSEHOLDELIGIBILITYPlease give me the names What is the Is Does Did How What is CIRCLE CIRCLE CIRCLEof the persons who usually r<strong>el</strong>ationship of (NAME) (NAME) (NAME) old is (NAME'S) LINE LINE LINElive in your household and (NAME) to the male or usually stay (NAME)? curr<strong>en</strong>t NUMBER NUMBER NUMBERguests of the household head of the female? live here marital OF ALL OF ALL OF ALLwho stayed here last night, household? here? last status? WOMEN CHILD- MENstarting with the head of night? AGE REN AGEthe household. SEE CODES 1 = MARRIED 15-49 AGE 0-5 15 - 54BELOW.OR LIVINGAFTER LISTING THE TOGETHER * LINE NO.NAMES AND RECORDING 2 = DIVOR- OFTHE RELATIONSHIP CED/ WOMANAND SEX FOR EACH SEPARATED SEL-PERSON, ASK 3 = WIDOWED ECTEDQUESTIONS 2A-2C 4 = NEVER- FOR Qs.TO BE SURE THAT THE MARRIED ONLISTING IS COMPLETE. AND DOM-NEVER ESTICTHEN ASK APPROPRIATE LIVED VIO-QUESTIONS IN COLUMNS TOGETHER LENCE.5-33 FOR EACH PERSON.(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)(8)(9) (10) (11)M F Y N Y NIN YEARS11 1 2 1 2 1 2 11 11 1112 1 2 1 2 1 2 12 12 1213 1 2 1 2 1 2 13 13 1314 1 2 1 2 1 2 14 14 1415 1 2 1 2 1 2 15 15 1516 1 2 1 2 1 2 16 16 1617 1 2 1 2 1 2 17 17 1718 1 2 1 2 1 2 18 18 1819 1 2 1 2 1 2 19 19 1920 1 2 1 2 1 2 20 20 20TICK HERE IF CONTINUATION SHEET USEDCODES FOR Q. 3: RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD2A) Just to make sure that I have a complete 01 = HEAD 08 = BROTHER OR SISTERlisting. Are there any other persons such as small ADD TO02 = WIFE OR HUSBAND 09 = NIECE/NEPHEW BY BLOODchildr<strong>en</strong> or infants that we have not listed? YES TABLE NO 03 = SON OR DAUGHTER 10 = NIECE/NEPHEW BY MARRIAGE2B) Are there any other people who may not be 04 = SON-IN-LAW OR 11 = OTHER RELATIVEmembers of your family, such as domestic ADD TODAUGHTER-IN-LAW 12 = ADOPTED/FOSTER/servants, lodgers, or fri<strong>en</strong>ds who usually live hereYES TABLE NO 05 = GRANDCHILD STEPCHILD2C) Are there any guests or temporary visitors 06 = PARENT 13 = NOT RELATEDstaying here, or anyone <strong>el</strong>se who stayed here last ADD TO07 = PARENT-IN-LAW 98 = DON'T KNOWnight, who have not be<strong>en</strong> listed? YES TABLE NOApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 325


IF AGE 4 YEARSOR OLDERIF AGE 4-24 YEARSIF AGE 0-4 YEARSLINE EVER ATTENDED CURRENT/RECENT SCHOOL ATTENDANCENO.SCHOOLBIRTH REGISTRATIONHas What is the Did During the 2008 Did During the 2007 Has (NAME) Why was(NAME) highest lev<strong>el</strong> of (NAME) school year, (NAME) school year, ever be<strong>en</strong> registered (NAME)ever school (NAME) att<strong>en</strong>d what lev<strong>el</strong> and att<strong>en</strong>d what with the never?att<strong>en</strong>ded has att<strong>en</strong>ded? school grade is/was school lev<strong>el</strong> and grade civil authority? registeredschool? at any (NAME) at any did (NAME)SEE CODES time att<strong>en</strong>ding? time att<strong>en</strong>d? 1 = YES, 1=TOO FARBELOW. during during REGISTEREDthe SEE CODES the SEE CODES WITH BIRTH 2=LITTLE MONEYWhat is the 2008 BELOW. 2007 BELOW. CERTIFICATEhighest grade school school 2 = YES, 3=NOT AWARE(NAME) year? year? REGISTEREDcompleted WITHOUT BIRTH 4=NOT NECESARYat that lev<strong>el</strong>?CERTIFICATE5=NOMADIC LIFESEE CODES 8 = DON'T KNOW DIFFICULTBELOW.TERRAIN3 = NOT INSECURITYREGISTERED8=OTHER(23)(24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (32)(33)Y N LEVEL GRADE Y N LEVEL GRADE Y N LEVEL GRADE Y Y DK NO11 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINE TO 3312 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3313 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3314 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3315 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3316 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3317 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINE TO 3318 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3319 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 3320 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 3GO TO 32 GO TO 27 GO TO 32TO NEXT LINETO 33CODES FOR Qs. 24, 26, AND 28: EDUCATIONLEVELGRADE0= NURSERY/KINDERGARTEN 00 = LESS THAN 1 YEAR COMPLETED1 = PRIMARY (USE '00' FOR Q. 24 ONLY.2= POST-PRIMARY, VOCATIONAL THIS CODE IS NOT ALLOWED3 = SECONDARY, A LEVEL FOR QS. 26 AND 28)4 = COLLEGE (MIDDLE LEVEL)5= UNIVERSITY 98 = DON'T KNOW8 = DON'T KNOW326 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


GRID TO SELECT ONE WOMAN PER HOUSEHOLDLOOK AT THE LAST DIGIT OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SERIAL NUMBER ON THE COVER PAGE. THIS IS THE NUMBER OF THEROW YOU SHOULD GO TO.CHECK THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WOMEN 15-49 IN COLUMN (9) OF THE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE.THIS IS THE NUMBER OF THE COLUMN YOU SHOULD GO TO.FIND THE BOX WHERE THE ROW AND THE COLUMN MEET AND CIRCLE THE NUMBER THAT APPEARS IN THE BOX.THIS NUMBER IS USED TO IDENTIFY WHETHER THE FIRST ('1'), SECOND ('2'), THIRD ('3'), ETC. ELIGIBLE WOMANLISTED IN THE HOUSEHOLD SCHEDULE WILL BE ASKED THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE QUESTIONS.PUT AN ASTERISK (*) NEXT TO THE LINE NUMBER OF THE SELECTED WOMAN IN COL.9.EXAMPLE: IF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SERIAL NUMBER IS ‘3716’, GO TO ROW ‘6’.IF THERE ARE THREE ELIGIBLE WOMEN IN THE HOUSEHOLD, GO TO COLUMN ‘3’.FIND THE BOX WHERE ROW '6' AND COLUMN '3' MEET. THE NUMBER IN THAT BOX ('2') INDICATES THAT THE SECONDELIGIBLE WOMAN IN THE HOUSEHOLD LISTING SHOULD BE ASKED THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE QUESTIONS.SUPPOSE THE LINE NUMBERS OF THE THREE WOMEN ARE ‘02', ‘03', AND ‘07’. THE WOMANTO BE ASKED THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE QUESTIONS IS THE SECOND ONE, I.E., THE WOMAN ON LINE ‘03'.LAST DIGIT OF THEQUESTIONNAIRESERIAL NUMBER(ROW)TOTAL NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE WOMEN IN HOUSEHOLD (COLUMN)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80 1 2 2 4 3 6 5 41 1 1 3 1 4 1 6 52 1 2 1 2 5 2 7 63 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 74 1 2 3 4 2 4 2 85 1 1 1 1 3 5 3 16 1 2 2 2 4 6 4 27 1 1 3 3 5 1 5 38 1 2 1 4 1 2 6 49 1 1 2 1 2 3 7 5App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 327


HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICSNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIESSKIP101 What is the main source of drinking water for members PIPED WATERof your household? PIPED INTO DWELLING . . . . . . . . . . 11PIPED TO COMPOUND/PLOT . . . . . . . . 12 106PUBLIC TAP/STANDPIPE . . . . . . . . . . 13TUBE WELL OR BOREHOLE . . . . . . . . . . 21DUG WELLPROTECTED WELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 103UNPROTECTED WELL . . . . . . . . . . . . 32WATER FROM SPRINGPROTECTED SPRING . . . . . . . . . . . . 41UNPROTECTED SPRING . . . . . . . . . . 42RAINWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 106TANKER TRUCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61CART WITH SMALL TANK . . . . . . . . . . 71SURFACE WATER (RIVER/DAM/ 103LAKE/POND/STREAM/CANAL/IRRIGATION CHANNEL) . . . . . . . . . . 81BOTTLED WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91OTHER 96 103(SPECIFY)102 What is the main source of water used by your PIPED WATERhousehold for other purposes such as cooking and PIPED INTO DWELLING . . . . . . . . . . 11handwashing? PIPED TO COMPOUND/PLOT . . . . . . . . 12 106PUBLIC TAP/STANDPIPE . . . . . . . . . . 13TUBE WELL OR BOREHOLE . . . . . . . . . . 21DUG WELLPROTECTED WELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31UNPROTECTED WELL . . . . . . . . . . . . 32WATER FROM SPRINGPROTECTED SPRING . . . . . . . . . . . . 41UNPROTECTED SPRING . . . . . . . . . . 42RAINWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 106TANKER TRUCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61CART WITH SMALL TANK . . . . . . . . . . 71SURFACE WATER (RIVER/DAM/LAKE/POND/STREAM/CANAL/IRRIGATION CHANNEL) . . . . . . . . . . 81OTHER 96(SPECIFY)103 Where is that water source located? IN OWN DWELLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IN OWN YARD/PLOT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 106ELSEWHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3104 How long does it take to go there, get water, andcome back? MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MORE THAN 12 HOURS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998105 Who usually goes to this source to fetch the water for ADULT WOMAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1your household? ADULT MAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2FEMALE CHILDUNDER 15 YEARS OLD . . . . . . . . . . 3MALE CHILDUNDER 15 YEARS OLD . . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)328 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIESSKIP106 Do you do anything to the water to make it safer to drink? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 108107 What do you usually do to make the water safer to drink? BOIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AADD BLEACH/CHLORINE . . . . . . . . . . BSTRAIN THROUGH A CLOTH . . . . . . . . CAnything <strong>el</strong>se?USE WATER FILTER (CERAMIC/SAND/COMPOSITE/ETC.) . . . . . . . . . . DRECORD ALL MENTIONED. SOLAR DISINFECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ELET IT STAND AND SETTLE . . . . . . . . . . FOTHERX(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z108 What kind of toilet facility do members of your FLUSH OR POUR FLUSH TOILEThousehold usually use? FLUSH TO PIPED SEWER SYSTEM . . . 11FLUSH TO SEPTIC TANK . . . . . . . . . . 12FLUSH TO PIT LATRINE . . . . . . . . . . 13FLUSH TO SOMEWHERE ELSE . . . 14FLUSH, DON'T KNOW WHERE . . . 15PIT LATRINEVENTILATED IMPROVEDPIT LATRINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21PIT LATRINE WITH SLAB . . . . . . . . . . 22PIT LATRINE WITHOUT SLAB/OPEN PIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23COMPOSTING TOILET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31BUCKET TOILET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41HANGING TOILET/HANGING LATRINE . 51NO FACILITY/BUSH/FIELD . . . . . . . . . . 61 111OTHER 96(SPECIFY)109 Do you share this toilet facility with other households? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 111110 How many households use this toilet facility? NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS0IF LESS THAN 10 . . . . . . . . . .10 OR MORE HOUSEHOLDS . . . . . . . . 95DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98111 Does your household have: YES NOA clock or watch? CLOCK/WATCH . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Electricity? ELECTRICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A radio? RADIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A t<strong>el</strong>evision? TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone? MOBILE TELEPHONE . . . . . 1 2A non-mobile t<strong>el</strong>ephone? NON-MOBILE TELEPHONE . 1 2A refrigerator? REFRIGERATOR . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A solar pan<strong>el</strong>? SOLAR PANEL . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2112 What type of fu<strong>el</strong> does your household mainly use ELECTRICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01for cooking? LPG/NATURAL GAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02BIOGAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03KEROSENE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04COAL, LIGNITE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05CHARCOAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06WOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07STRAW/SHRUBS/GRASS . . . . . . . . . . . . 08AGRICULTURAL CROP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09ANIMAL DUNG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10NO FOOD COOKEDIN HOUSEHOLD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 117OTHER 96(SPECIFY)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 329


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIESSKIP115 Is the cooking usually done in the house, in a separate IN THE HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1building, or outdoors? IN A SEPARATE BUILDING . . . . . . . . . . 2OUTDOORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 117OTHER 6(SPECIFY)116 Do you have a separate room which is used as a kitch<strong>en</strong>? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2117 MAIN MATERIAL OF THE FLOOR. NATURAL FLOOREARTH/SAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11RECORD OBSERVATION. DUNG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12RUDIMENTARY FLOORWOOD PLANKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21PALM/BAMBOO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22FINISHED FLOORPARQUET OR POLISHED WOOD . . . 31VINYL OR ASPHALT STRIPS . . . . . 32CERAMIC TILES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33CEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34CARPET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35OTHER 96(SPECIFY)118 MAIN MATERIAL OF THE ROOF. NATURAL ROOFINGRECORD OBSERVATION. GRASS / THATCH / MAKUTI . . . . . . . . 11DUNG / MUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12RUDIMENTARY ROOFINGCORRUGATED IRON (MABATI) . . . . . 21TIN CANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22FINISHED ROOFINGASBESTOS SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . 31CONCRETE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32TILES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33OTHER 96(SPECIFY)119 MAIN MATERIAL OF THE WALLS. NATURAL WALLSNO WALLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11RECORD OBSERVATION. CANE/PALM/TRUNKS . . . . . . . . . . . . 12DIRT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13RUDIMENTARY WALLSBAMBOO WITH MUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21STONE WITH MUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22UNCOVERED ADOBE . . . . . . . . . . . . 23PLYWOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24CARDBOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25REUSED WOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26FINISHED WALLSCEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31STONE WITH LIME/CEMENT . . . . . . . . 32BRICKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33CEMENT BLOCKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34COVERED ADOBE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35WOOD PLANKS/SHINGLES . . . . . . . . 36OTHER 96(SPECIFY)120 How many rooms in this household are used forsleeping? ROOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .330 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIESSKIP121 Does any member of this household own: YES NOA bicycle? BICYCLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A motorcycle or motor scooter? MOTORCYCLE/SCOOTER . . . 1 2An animal-drawn cart? ANIMAL-DRAWN CART . . . . . 1 2A car or truck? CAR/TRUCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2A boat with a motor? BOAT WITH MOTOR . . . . . . . . 1 2121A Does your household own this structure (house, flat, OWNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1shack), do you r<strong>en</strong>t it, or do you live here without pay? PAYS RENT/LEASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO RENT,W. CONSENT OF OWNER . . . . . 3NO RENT, SQUATTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4121B Does your household own the land on which the structure OWNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(house, flat, shack) sits? PAYS RENT/LEASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO RENT,W. CONSENT OF OWNER . . . . . 3NO RENT, SQUATTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4122 Does any member of this household own any agricultural YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1land? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 124123 How many hectares of land (altogether) are owned by themembers of this family. NUMBER OF HECTARES ….. .IF MORE THAN 95, WRITE '95.0'.IF UNKNOWN, WRITE '99.8'.124 Does this household own any livestock, herds, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1other farm animals, or poultry? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 125A125 How many of the following animals does this householdown?IF NONE, WRITE '00'. IF MORE THAN 95, WRITE '95'.IF UNKNOWN, WRITE '98'.Local cattle (indeg<strong>en</strong>eous)? CATTLE (INDIGENEOUS) . . . . .Milk cows or bulls? COWS/BULLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Horses, donkeys, or mules? HORSES/DONKEYS/MULES . . .Goats? GOATS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sheep? SHEEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Chick<strong>en</strong>? CHICKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125A At any time in the past 12 months, has anyone come into YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1your house to spray the inside walls against mosquitoes? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8127127125BHow many months ago was the house sprayed?IF LESS THAN ONE MONTH, WRITE '00' MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125C Who sprayed the house? GOVERNMENT WORKER/PROGRAMME . 1PRIVATE COMPANY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2OTHER______________________________ 6(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8127 Does your household have any mosquito nets that YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1can be used while sleeping? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2138128 How many mosquito nets does your household have?IF 7 OR MORE NETS, RECORD '7'. NUMBER OF NETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 331


NET #1 NET #2 NET #3129 ASK THE RESPONDENT TO SHOWYOU THE NETS IN THE HOUSEHOLD.IF MORE THAN 3 NETS, USE OBSERVED . . . . . 1 OBSERVED . . . . . 1 OBSERVED . . . . . 1ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S). NOT OBSERVED . 2 NOT OBSERVED . 2 NOT OBSERVED . 2130 How many months ago did your MONTHS MONTHS MONTHShousehold obtain the mosquito net? AGO . . . . . AGO . . . . . AGO . . . . .IF LESS THAN ONE MONTH, 37 OR MORE 37 OR MORE 37 OR MORERECORD '00'. MONTHS AGO . . . 95 MONTHS AGO . . . 95 MONTHS AGO . . . 95NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98131 OBSERVE OR ASK THE BRAND/ 'LONG LASTING' NET 'LONG LASTING' NET 'LONG LASTING' NETTYPE OF MOSQUITO NET. PERMANET . . . . . 11 PERMANET . . . . . 11 PERMANET . . . . . 11OLYSET . . . . . . . 12 OLYSET . . . . . . . 12 OLYSET . . . . . . . 12SUPANET EXTRA 13 SUPANET EXTRA 13 SUPANET EXTRA 13OTHER/ OTHER/ OTHER/DK BRAND . . . . . 16 DK BRAND . . . . . 16 DK BRAND . . . . . 16(SKIP TO 135) (SKIP TO 135) (SKIP TO 135)'CONVENTIONAL' NET 'CONVENTIONAL' NET 'CONVENTIONAL' NETKINGA NET . . . . . 21 KINGA NET . . . . . 21 KINGA NET . . . . . 21SUPANET . . . . . 22 SUPANET . . . . . 22 SUPANET . . . . . 22UNBRANDED UNBRANDED UNBRANDEDRURAL NET . . . 23 RURAL NET . . . 23 RURAL NET . . . 23OTHER/ OTHER/ OTHER/DK BRAND . . . . . 26 DK BRAND . . . . . 26 DK BRAND . . . . . 26(SKIP TO 133) (SKIP TO 133) (SKIP TO 133)OTHER . . . . . . . . . 31 OTHER . . . . . . . . . 31 OTHER . . . . . . . . . 31DK BRAND . . . . . . . 98 DK BRAND . . . . . . . 98 DK BRAND . . . . . . . 98132 Wh<strong>en</strong> you got the net, was it treated YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1with an insecticide to kill or NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2rep<strong>el</strong> mosquitos? NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8133 Since you got the mosquito net, was it YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1ever soaked or dipped in a liquid to kill NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or rep<strong>el</strong> mosquitos? (SKIP TO 135) (SKIP TO 135) (SKIP TO 135)NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8134 How many months ago was the net last MONTHS MONTHS MONTHSsoaked or dipped? AGO . . . . . AGO . . . . . AGO . . . . .IF LESS THAN ONE MONTH,RECORD '00'. 25 OR MORE 25 OR MORE 25 OR MOREMONTHS AGO . . . 95 MONTHS AGO . . . 95 MONTHS AGO . . . 95NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 98134AThe last time the net was treated,was a liquid from a packet like thisadded to the treatm<strong>en</strong>t solution? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1SHOW SACHET FOR K-O TAB 1-2-3 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2BINDING AGENT. NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8134B The last time the net was treated, was YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1it treated as part of a net retreatm<strong>en</strong>t NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2campaign? NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8135 Did anyone sleep under this mosquito YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1net last night? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 137) (SKIP TO 137) (SKIP TO 137)NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8 NOT SURE . . . . . . . 8332 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NET #1 NET #2 NET #3136 Who slept under this mosquitonet last night?RECORD THE PERSON'S NAME_____________ NAME_____________ NAME_____________LINE NUMBER FROM THEHOUSEHOLD SCHEDULE. LINE LINE LINENO. . . . . . NO. . . . . . NO. . . . . .NAME_____________ NAME_____________ NAME_____________LINE LINE LINENO. . . . . . NO. . . . . . NO. . . . . .NAME_____________ NAME_____________ NAME_____________LINE LINE LINENO. . . . . . NO. . . . . . NO. . . . . .NAME_____________ NAME_____________ NAME_____________LINE LINE LINENO. . . . . . NO. . . . . . NO. . . . . .137 GO BACK TO 129 FOR GO BACK TO 129 FOR GO TO 129 IN FIRSTNEXT NET; OR, IF NO NEXT NET; OR, IF NO COLUMN OF A NEWMORE NETS, GO TO 138. MORE NETS, GO TO 138. QUESTIONNAIRE;OR, IF NO MORENETS, GO TO 138.138 ASK RESPONDENT FOR A TEASPOONFUL OF COOKING 0 PPM (NO IODINE)……………………………………… 1SALT BELOW 15 PPM………………………………………… 215 PPM AND ABOVE………………………………….. 3TEST SALT FOR IODINE NO SALT IN HH………………………………………… 4SALT NOT TESTED________________________ 6RECORD PPM (PARTS PER MILLION) (SPECIFY REASON)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 333


WEIGHT AND HEIGHT MEASUREMENT FOR CHILDREN AGE 0-5501 CHECK COLUMN 10. RECORD THE LINE NUMBER AND AGE FOR ALL ELIGIBLE CHILDREN 0-5 YEARS IN QUESTION 502.IF MORE THAN SIX CHILDREN, USE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE. A FINAL OUTCOME MUST BE RECORDED FOR THEWEIGHT AND HEIGHT MEASUREMENT IN 508.CHILD 1 CHILD 2 CHILD 3502 LINE NUMBER FROM COLUMN 10 LINE LINE LINENUMBER . . . NUMBER . . . NUMBER . . .NAME FROM COLUMN 2 NAME NAME NAME503 IF MOTHER INTERVIEWED, COPYMONTH AND YEAR FROM BIRTH DAY . . . . . . . . . . DAY . . . . . . . . . . DAY . . . . . . . . . .HISTORY AND ASK DAY; IF MOTHERNOT INTERVIEWED, ASK: MONTH . . . . . MONTH . . . . . MONTH . . . . .What is (NAME'S) birth date?YEAR YEAR YEAR504 CHECK 503: YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1CHILD BORN IN JANUARY 2003 OR NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2LATER? (GO TO 503 FOR NEXT (GO TO 503 FOR NEXT (GO TO 503 FOR NEXTCHILD OR, IF NO CHILD OR, IF NO CHILD OR, IF NOMORE, GO TO 515) MORE, GO TO 515) MORE, GO TO 515)505 WEIGHT IN KILOGRAMS506 HEIGHT IN CENTIMETERSKG. . . . . KG. . . . . KG. . . . .CM. . CM. . CM. .507 MEASURED LYING DOWN OR LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1 LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1 LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1STANDING UP? STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2 STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2 STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2508 RESULT OF WEIGHT AND HEIGHT MEASURED . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . 1MEASUREMENT NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6514 GO BACK TO 503 IN NEXT COLUMN IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE OR IN THE FIRSTCOLUMN OF THE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S); IF NO MORE CHILDREN, GO TO 515.CHILD 4 CHILD 5 CHILD 6502 LINE NUMBER FROM COLUMN 10 LINE LINE LINENUMBER . . . NUMBER . . . NUMBER . . .NAME FROM COLUMN 2 NAME NAME NAME503 IF MOTHER INTERVIEWED, COPYMONTH AND YEAR FROM BIRTH DAY . . . . . . . . . . DAY . . . . . . . . . . DAY . . . . . . . . . .HISTORY AND ASK DAY; IF MOTHERNOT INTERVIEWED, ASK: MONTH . . . . . MONTH . . . . . MONTH . . . . .What is (NAME'S) birth date?YEAR YEAR YEAR504 CHECK 503: YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1CHILD BORN IN JANUARY 2003 OR NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2LATER (GO TO 503 FOR NEXT (GO TO 503 FOR NEXT (GO TO 503 FOR NEXTCHILD OR, IF NO CHILD OR, IF NO CHILD OR, IF NOMORE, GO TO 515) MORE, GO TO 515) MORE, GO TO 515)505 WEIGHT IN KILOGRAMS506 HEIGHT IN CENTIMETERSKG. . . . . KG. . . . . KG. . . . .CM. . CM. . CM. .507 MEASURED LYING DOWN OR LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1 LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1 LYING DOWN . . . . . . . 1STANDING UP? STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2 STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2 STANDING UP . . . . . . . 2508 RESULT OF WEIGHT AND HEIGHT MEASURED . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . 1MEASUREMENT NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . 2REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . 6514 GO BACK TO 503 IN NEXT COLUMN IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE OR IN THE FIRSTCOLUMN OF ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S); IF NO MORE CHILDREN, GO TO 515.334 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


WEIGHT, HEIGHT AND HIV TESTING FOR WOMEN AGE 15-49515 CHECK COLUMN 9. RECORD THE LINE NUMBER AND NAME FOR ALL ELIGIBLE WOMEN IN 516.IF THERE ARE MORE THAN THREE WOMEN, USE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S).A FINAL OUTCOME MUST BE RECORDED FOR THE WEIGHT AND HEIGHT MEASUREMENT IN 519 AND FOR THE HIV TEST PROCEDURE IN 530.WOMAN 1 WOMAN 2 WOMAN 3516 LINE NUMBER LINE LINE LINE(COLUMN 9) NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME(COLUMN 2) NAME NAME NAME517 WEIGHTIN KILOGRAMS KG. . . . . . . . . . KG. . . . . . . . KG. . . . . . . .518 HEIGHTIN CENTIMETERS CM. . . . . . . . . . CM. . . . . . . . CM. . . . . . . .519 RESULT OF MEASURED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 MEASURED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1WEIGHT NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2AND HEIGHT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3MEASUREMENT OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6520 AGE: CHECK 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .COLUMN 7. 18-49 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 18-49 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 18-49 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(GO TO 525) (GO TO 525) (GO TO 525)521 MARITAL STATUS: CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION) . . . 1 CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION) . . . 1 CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION) . . . . . .CHECK COLUMN 8. OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(GO TO 525) (GO TO 525) (GO TO 525)522 RECORD LINENUMBER OFPARENT/OTHERADULT RESPON-SIBLE FOR LINE NUMBER OF LINE NUMBER OF LINE NUMBER OFADOLESCENT. PARENT OR OTHER PARENT OR OTHER PARENT OR OTHERRECORD '00' RESPONSIBLE ADULT . RESPONSIBLE ADULT . RESPONSIBLE ADULT .IF NOT LISTED.525 READ THE HIV GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1TEST CONSENT PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLESTATEMENT. FOR ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NEVER-IN-UNION RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENTWOMEN REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3AGE 15-17,ASK CONSENTFROM PARENT/ (SIGN) (SIGN) (SIGN)OTHER ADULTIDENTIFIED IN 522BEFORE ASKINGRESPONDENT'SCONSENT.CONSENT STATEMENT FOR HIV TESTREAD CONSENT STATEMENT TO EACH RESPONDENT. CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 525 IF RESPONDENT CONSENTS TO THE HIV TEST ANDCODE '3' IF SHE REFUSES.FOR NEVER-IN-UNION WOMEN AGE 15-17, ASK CONSENT FROM THE PARENT OR OTHER ADULT IDENTIFIED AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADOLESCENT(SEE 522) BEFORE ASKING THE ADOLESCENT FOR HER CONSENT. CIRCLE CODE '2' IN 525 IF THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT)REFUSES. CONDUCT THE TEST ONLY IF BOTH THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT) AND THE ADOLESCENT CONSENT.As part of the survey we also are asking people all over the country to take an HIV test. HIV is the virus that causes AIDS. AIDS is a very seriousillness. The HIV test is being done to see how big the AIDS problem is in K<strong>en</strong>ya.For the HIV test, we need a few drops of blood from a finger. The equipm<strong>en</strong>t used in taking the blood is clean and complet<strong>el</strong>y safe.It has never be<strong>en</strong> used before and will be thrown away after each test.No names will be attached so we will not be able to t<strong>el</strong>l you the test results. No one <strong>el</strong>se will be able to know (your/NAME OF ADOLESCENT's) test results either.If you want to know whether you have HIV, I can provide you with a list of nearby facilities offering couns<strong>el</strong>ing and testing for HIV. I will also give youa voucher for free services for you (and for your partner if you want) that you can use at any of these facilities.Do you have any questions?You can say yes to the test, or you can say no. It is up to you to decide.Will you allow (NAME OF ADOLESCENT to) take the HIV test?App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 335


WOMAN 1 WOMAN 2 WOMAN 3LINE NUMBER LINE LINE LINE(COLUMN 9) NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME(COLUMN 2) NAME NAME NAME526 CHECK 525 AND PREPARE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES FOR THE HIV TEST IF CONSENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND PROCEED WITH THE TEST.A FINAL OUTCOME FOR THE THE HIV TEST PROCEDURE MUST BE RECORDED IN 530 FOR EACH ELIGIBLE WOMAN EVEN IF SHE WASNOT PRESENT, REFUSED, OR COULD NOT BE TESTED FOR SOME OTHER REASON.529 BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABELHERE. HERE. HERE.PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABELON THE RESPONDENT'S ON THE RESPONDENT'S ON THE RESPONDENT'SFILTER PAPER AND THE 3RD FILTER PAPER AND THE 3RD FILTER PAPER AND THE 3RDON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM. ON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM. ON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM.530 OUTCOME OF BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1HIV TEST NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2PROCEDURE REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6530A CHECK 530: BLOOD BLOOD NOT BLOOD BLOOD NOT BLOOD BLOOD NOTOUTCOME OF TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKENHIV TESTGO TO NEXT WOMAN GO TO NEXT WOMAN GO TO NEXT WOMAN530B READ THE GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1CONSENT STATE- PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLEMENT FOR ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ADDITIONAL TESTS. RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENTFOR NEVER-IN REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3UNION WOMENAGE 15-17,ASK CONSENT (SIGN) (SIGN) (SIGN)FROM PARENT/OTHER ADULTIDENTIFIED IN 522BEFORE ASKINGRESPONDENT'SCONSENT.530C ADDITIONAL TESTS CHECK 530B: CHECK 530B: CHECK 530B:IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEEN IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEEN IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEENGRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONAL GRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONAL GRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONALTEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER. TEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER. TEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER.530DGO BACK TO 517 IN NEXT COLUMN IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE OR IN THE FIRST COLUMNS OF ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S); IF NO MOREWOMEN, GO TO 531.CONSENT STATEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL TESTSREAD CONSENT STATEMENT TO EACH RESPONDENT. CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 530B IF RESPONDENT CONSENTS TO THE ADDITIONAL TESTS ANDCODE '3' IF SHE REFUSES.FOR NEVER-IN-UNION WOMEN AGE 15-17, ASK CONSENT FROM THE PARENT OR OTHER ADULT IDENTIFIED AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADOLESCENT(SEE 522) BEFORE ASKING THE ADOLESCENT FOR HER CONSENT. CIRCLE CODE '2' IN 530B IF THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT) REFUSES.CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 530B IF BOTH THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT) AND THE ADOLESCENT CONSENT.We ask you to allow K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics to store part of the blood sample at the laboratoryto be used for testing or research in the future. We are not certain about what tests might be done.The blood sample will not have any name or other data attached that could id<strong>en</strong>tify (you/NAME OF ADOLESCENT). You do not have to agree.If you do not want the blood sample stored for later use, (you/NAME OF ADOLESCENT) can still participate in the HIV testing in this survey. Willyou allow us to keep the blood sample stored for later testing or research?336 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


HIV TESTING FOR MEN AGE 15-54531 CHECK COLUMN 11. RECORD THE LINE NUMBER AND NAME FOR ALL ELIGIBLE MEN IN 532.IF THERE ARE MORE THAN THREE MEN, USE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S).A FINAL OUTCOME MUST BE RECORDED FOR THE HIV TEST PROCEDURE IN 545.MAN 1 MAN 2 MAN 3532 LINE NUMBER LINE LINE LINE(COLUMN 11) NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME(COLUMN 2) NAME NAME NAME536 AGE: CHECK 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 15-17 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .COLUMN 7. 18-54 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 18-54 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 18-54 YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(GO TO 540) (GO TO 540) (GO TO 540)537 MARITAL STATUS: CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION). . . . . . 1 CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION). . . . . . 1 CODE 4 (NEVER IN UNION). . . . . . . .CHECK COLUMN OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8. (GO TO 540) (GO TO 540) (GO TO 540)538 RECORD LINENUMBER OFPARENT/OTHERADULT RESPON-SIBLE FOR LINE NUMBER OF LINE NUMBER OF LINE NUMBER OFADOLESCENT. PARENT OR OTHER PARENT OR OTHER PARENT OR OTHERRECORD '00' RESPONSIBLE ADULT . RESPONSIBLE ADULT . RESPONSIBLE ADULT .IF NOT LISTED.540 READ THE HIV GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1TEST CONSENT PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLESTATEMENT. FOR ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NEVER-IN-UNION RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENTMEN AGE 15-17, REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3ASK CONSENTFROM PARENT/OTHER ADULT (SIGN) (SIGN) (SIGN)IDENTIFIED IN 538BEFORE ASKINGRESPONDENT'SCONSENT.541 CHECK 540 AND PREPARE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES FOR THE HIV TEST IFCONSENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND PROCEED WITH THE TEST.A FINAL OUTCOME OF THE HIV TEST PROCEDURE MUST BE RECORDED IN 545 FOR EACH ELIGIBLE MAN EVEN IF HE WAS NOT PRESENT,REFUSED, OR COULD NOT BE TESTED FOR SOME OTHER REASON.544 BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 1ST BAR CODE LABELHERE. HERE. HERE.PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABEL PUT THE 2ND BAR CODE LABELON THE RESPONDENT'S ON THE RESPONDENT'S ON THE RESPONDENT'SFILTER PAPER AND THE 3RD FILTER PAPER AND THE 3RD FILTER PAPER AND THE 3RDON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM. ON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM. ON THE TRANSMITTAL FORM.CONSENT STATEMENT FOR HIV TESTREAD CONSENT STATEMENT TO EACH RESPONDENT. CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 540 IF RESPONDENT CONSENTS TO THE HIV TEST AND CODE '3'IF HE REFUSES.FOR NEVER-IN-UNION MEN AGE 15-17, ASK CONSENT FROM THE PARENT OR OTHER ADULT IDENTIFIED AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADOLESCENT(SEE 538) BEFORE ASKING THE ADOLESCENT FOR HIS CONSENT. CIRCLE CODE '2' IN 540 IF THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT)REFUSES. CONDUCT THE TEST ONLY IF BOTH THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT) AND THE ADOLESCENT CONSENT.As part of the survey we also are asking people all over the country to take an HIV test. HIV is the virus that causes AIDS. AIDS is a very seriousillness. The HIV test is being done to see how big the AIDS problem is in K<strong>en</strong>ya.For the HIV test, we need a few drops of blood from a finger. The equipm<strong>en</strong>t used in taking the blood is clean and complet<strong>el</strong>y safe.It has never be<strong>en</strong> used before and will be thrown away after each test.No names will be attached so we will not be able to t<strong>el</strong>l you the test results. No one <strong>el</strong>se will be able to know (your/NAME OF ADOLESCENT's) test results either.If you want to know whether you have HIV, I can provide you with a list of nearby facilities offering couns<strong>el</strong>ing and testing for HIV. I will also give youa voucher for free services for you (and for your partner if you want) that you can use at any of these facilities.Do you have any questions?You can say yes to the test, or you can say no. It is up to you to decide.Will you allow (NAME OF ADOLESCENT to) take the HIV test?App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 337


MAN 1 MAN 2 MAN 3LINE NUMBER LINE LINE LINE(COLUMN 11) NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME(COLUMN 2) NAME NAME NAME545 OUTCOME OF BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 BLOOD TAKEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1HIV TEST NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2PROCEDURE REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6545A CHECK 545 BLOOD BLOOD NOT BLOOD BLOOD NOT BLOOD BLOOD NOTOUTCOME OF TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKEN TAKENHIV TESTGO TO NEXT MAN GO TO NEXT MAN GO TO NEXT MAN545B READ THE GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRANTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1CONSENT STATE- PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLE PARENT/OTHER RESPONSIBLEMENT FOR ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 ADULT REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ADDITIONAL TESTS RESPONDENT RESPONDENT RESPONDENTWITH LEFT OVER REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 REFUSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3BLOOD. FORNEVER-IN-UNIONMEN (SIGN) (SIGN) (SIGN)AGE 15-17,ASK CONSENTFROM PARENT/OTHER ADULTIDENTIFIED IN 538BEFORE ASKINGRESPONDENT'SCONSENT.545C ADDITIONAL TESTS CHECK 545B: CHECK 545B: CHECK 545B:IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEEN IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEEN IF CONSENT HAS NOT BEENGRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONAL GRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONAL GRANTED WRITE "NO ADDITIONALTEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER. TEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER. TEST" ON THE FILTER PAPER.545DGO BACK TO 536 IN NEXT COLUMN IN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE OR IN THE FIRST COLUMNS OF ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE(S); IF NO MOREMEN, END INTERVIEW.CONSENT STATEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL TESTSREAD CONSENT STATEMENT TO EACH RESPONDENT. CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 545B IF RESPONDENT CONSENTS TO THE ADDITIONAL TESTS ANDCODE '3' IF HE REFUSES.FOR NEVER-IN-UNION MEN AGE 15-17, ASK CONSENT FROM THE PARENT OR OTHER ADULT IDENTIFIED AS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ADOLESCENT(SEE 538) BEFORE ASKING THE ADOLESCENT FOR HIS CONSENT. CIRCLE CODE '2' IN 545B IF THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT)REFUSES. CIRCLE CODE '1' IN 545B ONLY IF BOTH THE PARENT (OTHER ADULT) AND THE ADOLESCENT CONSENT.We ask you to allow K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics to store part of the blood sample at the laboratoryto be used for testing or research in the future. We are not certain about what tests might be done.The blood sample will not have any name or other data attached that could id<strong>en</strong>tify (you/NAME OF ADOLESCENT). You do not have to agree.If you do not want the blood sample stored for later use, (you/NAME OF ADOLESCENT) can still participate in the HIV testing in this survey. Will youallow us to keep the blood sample stored for later testing or research?338 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


CONFIDENTIALKENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICSKENYA DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY 2008WOMAN'S QUESTIONNAIREIDENTIFICATIONPROVINCE*DISTRICTLOCATION/TOWNSUBLOCATION/WARDNASSEP CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .KDHS CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HOUSEHOLD NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAIROBI/MOMBASA/KISUMU=1; NAKURU/ELDORET/THIKA/NYERI=2;SMALL TOWN=3; RURAL=4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME OF HOUSEHOLD HEADNAME AND LINE NUMBER OF WOMANINTERVIEWER VISITS1 23FINAL VISITDATEINTERVIEWER'SNAMERESULT**DAYMONTHYEARINT. NUMBERFINAL RESULT2 0 0NEXT VISIT:DATETIMETOTAL NUMBEROF VISITS**RESULT CODES:1 COMPLETED 4 REFUSED2 NOT AT HOME 5 PARTLY COMPLETED 7 OTHER3 POSTPONED 6 INCAPACITATED (SPECIFY)LANGUAGELANGUAGE OF QUESTIONNAIRE:LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW***ENGLISHHOME LANGUAGE OF RESPONDENT***WAS A TRANSLATOR USED? (YES=1, NO=2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .***LANGUAGE CODES:01 EMBU 04 KIKUYU 07 LUO 10 MIJIKENDA 13 ENGLISH02 KALENJIN 05 KISII 08 MAASAI 11 SOMALI 14 OTHER03 KAMBA 06 LUHYA 09 MERU 12 KISWAHILISUPERVISOR FIELD EDITOR OFFICE EDITORKEYED BYNAMEDATENAMEDATE* Province: NAIROBI=1; CENTRAL=2; COAST=3; EASTERN=4; NYANZA=5; R.VALLEY=6; WESTERN=7; NORTHEASTERN=8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 339


SECTION 1. RESPONDENT'S BACKGROUNDINTRODUCTION AND CONSENTH<strong>el</strong>lo. My name is ________ and I am working with the K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics. We are conducting a national surveythat asks wom<strong>en</strong> about various health issues. We would very much appreciate your participation in this survey.This information will h<strong>el</strong>p the governm<strong>en</strong>t to plan health services. The survey usually takes betwe<strong>en</strong> 30 to 60 minutes to complete.Whatever information you provide will be kept confid<strong>en</strong>tial and will not be shown to anyone other than members of our survey team.Participation in this survey is voluntary, and if we should come to any question you don't want to answer, just let me know andI will go on to the next question; or you can stop the interview at any time. However, we hope that you will participate in this surveysince your views are important.At this time, do you want to ask me anything about the survey?May I begin the interview now?Signature of interviewer:Date:RESPONDENT AGREES TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . . . 1 RESPONDENT DOES NOT AGREE TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . 2 ENDNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP101 RECORD THE TIME.HOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102 First I would like to ask some questions about you and your NAIROBI/ MOMBASA/KISUMU . . . . . 1household. For most of the time until you were 12 years old, OTHER CITY/TOWN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2did you live in Nairobi, Mombasa, in another city or town, or in COUNTRY SIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3the country-side? OUTSIDE KENYA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4103 How long have you be<strong>en</strong> living continuously in (NAME OFCURRENT PLACE OF RESIDENCE)? YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF LESS THAN ONE YEAR, RECORD '00' YEARS. ALWAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95VISITOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 106104 Just before you moved here, did you live in a city, in a town, or in CITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1the countryside? TOWN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2COUNTRYSIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3106 In what month and year were you born?MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DON'T KNOW MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 98YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .DON'T KNOW YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998107 How old were you at your last birthday?COMPARE AND CORRECT 106 AND/OR 107 IF INCONSISTENT.AGE IN COMPLETED YEARS108 Have you ever att<strong>en</strong>ded school? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 112109 What is the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of school you att<strong>en</strong>ded: PRIMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1primary, vocational, secondary, or higher? POST-PRIMARY/VOCATIONAL . . . . . 2SECONDARY/'A' LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . 3COLLEGE (MIDDLE LEVEL) . . . . . . . . 4UNIVERSITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5110 What is the highest (standard/form/year) you completed at thatlev<strong>el</strong>? IF NONE, WRITE '00'. STANDARD/FORM/YEAR . . .340 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP111 CHECK 109:PRIMARY,SECONDARYPOST-PRIMARY/VOCATIONAL, OR HIGHER 115112 Now I would like you to read this s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce to me. CANNOT READ AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . 1ABLE TO READ ONLY PARTS OFSHOW SENTENCES BELOW TO RESPONDENT. SENTENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ABLE TO READ WHOLE SENTENCE. . 3IF RESPONDENT CANNOT READ WHOLE SENTENCE, PROBE: NO CARD WITH REQUIREDCan you read any part of the s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce to me? LANGUAGE 4(SPECIFY LANGUAGE)BLIND/VISUALLY IMPAIRED . . . . . . 5113 Have you ever participated in a literacy program or any otherprogram that involves learning to read or write (not including YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1primary school)? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2114 CHECK 112:CODE '2', '3', OR '4' CODE '1' OR '5' 116CIRCLEDCIRCLED115 Do you read a newspaper or magazine almost every day, at least ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1once a week, less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4116 Do you list<strong>en</strong> to the radio almost every day, at least once a week, ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4117 Do you watch t<strong>el</strong>evision almost every day, at least once a week, ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4118 What is your r<strong>el</strong>igion? ROMAN CATHOLIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1PROTESTANT/OTHER CHRISTIAN . . . 2MUSLIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3NO RELIGION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)119 What is your ethnic group/tribe? EMBU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01KALENJIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02KAMBAKIKUYU. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0304KISII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05LUHYA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06LUO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MASAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0708MERU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09MIJIKENDA/SWAHILI . . . . . . . . . . . . 10SOMALI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11TAITA/TAVETA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12OTHER(SPECIFY)96App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 341


SECTION 2. REPRODUCTIONNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP201 Now I would like to ask about all the live births you have had YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1during your life. Have you ever giv<strong>en</strong> birth? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 206202 Do you have any sons or daughters to whom you have giv<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1birth who are now living with you? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 204203 How many sons live with you? SONS AT HOME . . . . . . . . . . . .And how many daughters live with you? DAUGHTERS AT HOME . . . . .IF NONE, RECORD '00'.204 Do you have any sons or daughters to whom you have giv<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1birth who are alive but do not live with you? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 206205 How many sons are alive but do not live with you? SONS ELSEWHERE . . . . . . .And how many daughters are alive but do not live with you? DAUGHTERS ELSEWHERE . . .IF NONE, RECORD '00'.206 Sometimes it happ<strong>en</strong>s that childr<strong>en</strong> die. It may be painful totalk about and I am sorry to ask you about painful memories, butit is important to get correct information. Have you ever giv<strong>en</strong>birth to a son or daughter who was born alive but later died?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IF NO, PROBE: Any baby who cried or showed signs of life but NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 208did not survive?207 How many boys have died? BOYS DEAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . .And how many girls have died? GIRLS DEAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF NONE, RECORD '00'.208 SUM ANSWERS TO 203, 205, AND 207, AND ENTER TOTAL.IF NONE, RECORD '00'. TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .209 CHECK 208:Just to make sure that I have this right: you have had in TOTAL_____ births during your life. Is that correct?PROBE ANDYES NO CORRECT201-208 ASNECESSARY.210 CHECK 208:ONE OR MORENO BIRTHSBIRTHS 226342 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


211 Now I would like to record the names of all your births, whether still alive or not, starting with the first one you had.RECORD NAMES OF ALL THE BIRTHS IN 212. RECORD TWINS AND TRIPLETS ON SEPARATE LINES.(IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 12 BIRTHS, USE AN ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE, STARTING WITH THE SECOND ROW).212 213214 215 216 217 218 219220 221IF ALIVE: IF ALIVE: IF ALIVE: IF DEAD:What name Were Is In what month Is How old was Is (NAME) RECORD How old was (NAME) Were therewas giv<strong>en</strong> to any of (NAME) and year was (NAME) (NAME) at living with HOUSE- wh<strong>en</strong> he/she died? any otheryour these a boy or (NAME) born? still his/her last you? HOLD LINE live births(first/next) births a girl? alive? birthday? NUMBER OF IF '1 YR', PROBE: betwe<strong>en</strong>baby? twins? PROBE: CHILD How many months old (NAME OFWhat is his/her RECORD (RECORD '00' was (NAME)? PREVIOUSbirthday? AGE IN IF CHILD NOT RECORD DAYS IF BIRTH) andCOM- LISTED IN LESS THAN 1 (NAME),PLETED HOUSE- MONTH; MONTHS IF includingYEARS. HOLD). LESS THAN TWO any childr<strong>en</strong>(NAME)YEARS; OR YEARS. who diedafter birth?01 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1YEAR MONTHS 2MULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2(NEXT BIRTH) YEARS . . 322002 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH03 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH04 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH05 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH06 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH07 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTHApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 343


212 213 214 215216 217218 219220221IF ALIVE: IF ALIVE: IF ALIVE: IF DEAD:What name Were Is In what month Is How old was Is (NAME) RECORD How old was (NAME) Were therewas giv<strong>en</strong> to any of (NAME) and year was (NAME) (NAME) at living with HOUSE- wh<strong>en</strong> he/she died? any otheryour next these a boy or (NAME) born? still his/her last you? HOLD LINE live birthsbaby? births a girl? alive? birthday? NUMBER OF IF '1 YR', PROBE: betwe<strong>en</strong>twins? PROBE: CHILD How many months old (NAME OFWhat is his/her RECORD (RECORD '00' was (NAME)? PREVIOUSbirthday? AGE IN IF CHILD NOT RECORD DAYS IF BIRTH) andCOM- LISTED IN LESS THAN 1 (NAME),PLETED HOUSE- MONTH; MONTHS IF includingYEARS. HOLD). LESS THAN TWO any childr<strong>en</strong>(NAME)YEARS; OR YEARS. who diedafter birth?08 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH09 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH10 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH11 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH12 MONTH AGE INLINE NUMBER DAYS . . . 1 YES . . . . 1SING 1 BOY 1 YES . . 1 YEARS YES . . . 1 ADDYEAR MONTHS 2 BIRTHMULT 2 GIRL 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . . 2 NO . . . . . 2(GO TO 221) YEARS . . 3 NEXT220 BIRTH222 Have you had any live births since the birth of (NAME OF YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1LAST BIRTH)? IF YES, RECORD BIRTH(S) IN TABLE. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2223 COMPARE 208 WITH NUMBER OF BIRTHS IN HISTORY ABOVE AND MARK:NUMBERSNUMBERS AREARE SAME DIFFERENT (PROBE AND RECONCILE)CHECK:FOR EACH BIRTH: YEAR OF BIRTH IS RECORDED.FOR EACH BIRTH SINCE JANUARY 2003: MONTH AND YEAR OF BIRTH ARE RECORDED.FOR EACH LIVING CHILD: CURRENT AGE IS RECORDED.FOR EACH DEAD CHILD: AGE AT DEATH IS RECORDED.FOR AGE AT DEATH 12 MONTHS OR 1 YEAR: PROBE TO DETERMINE EXACTNUMBER OF MONTHS.224 CHECK 215 AND ENTER THE NUMBER OF BIRTHS IN 2003 OR LATER.IF NONE, RECORD '0' AND SKIP TO 226.344 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP225 FOR EACH BIRTH SINCE JANUARY 2003, ENTER 'B' IN THE MONTH OF BIRTH IN THE CALENDAR.WRITE THE NAME OF THE CHILD TO THE LEFT OF THE 'B' CODE. FOR EACH BIRTH,ASK THE NUMBER OF MONTHS THE PREGNANCY LASTED AND RECORD 'P' IN EACH OF THEPRECEDING MONTHS ACCORDING TO THE DURATION OF PREGNANCY. (NOTE: THE NUMBEROF 'P's MUST BE ONE LESS THAN THE NUMBER OF MONTHS THAT THE PREGNANCY LASTED.)226 Are you pregnant now? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 229227 How many months pregnant are you?RECORD NUMBER OF COMPLETED MONTHS.ENTER 'P's IN THE CALENDAR, BEGINNING WITHTHE MONTH OF INTERVIEW AND FOR THE TOTAL NUMBEROF COMPLETED MONTHS.MONTHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .228 At the time you became pregnant, did you want to become THEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1pregnant th<strong>en</strong>, did you want to wait until later, or did you not want LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2to have any (more) childr<strong>en</strong> at all? NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3229 Have you ever had a pregnancy that miscarried, was aborted, or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>en</strong>ded in a stillbirth? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 237230 Wh<strong>en</strong> did the last such pregnancy <strong>en</strong>d?MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .231 CHECK 230:LAST PREGNANCYLAST PREGNANCYENDED IN ENDED BEFORE 237JAN. 2003 OR LATER JAN. 2003232 How many months pregnant were you wh<strong>en</strong> the last suchpregnancy <strong>en</strong>ded? MONTHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .RECORD NUMBER OF COMPLETED MONTHS. ENTER 'T' INTHE CALENDAR IN THE MONTH THAT THE PREGNANCYTERMINATED AND 'P' FOR THE REMAINING NUMBEROF COMPLETED MONTHS.233 Since January 2003, have you had any other pregnancies YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1that did not result in a live birth? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 235234 ASK THE DATE AND THE DURATION OF PREGNANCY FOR EACH EARLIER NON-LIVE BIRTH PREGNANCYBACK TO JANUARY 2003.ENTER 'T' IN THE CALENDAR IN THE MONTH THAT EACH PREGNANCY TERMINATED AND 'P'FOR THE REMAINING NUMBER OF COMPLETED MONTHS.235 Did you have any miscarriages, abortions or stillbirths that YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>en</strong>ded before 2003? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 237236 Wh<strong>en</strong> did the last such pregnancy that terminated before2003 <strong>en</strong>d? MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 345


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP237 Wh<strong>en</strong> did your last m<strong>en</strong>strual period start?DAYS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . 1WEEKS AGO . . . . . . . . . 2MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . 3(DATE, IF GIVEN) YEARS AGO . . . . . . . . . 4IN MENOPAUSE/HAS HAD HYSTERECTOMY . . . 994BEFORE LAST BIRTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 995NEVER MENSTRUATED . . . . . . . . . 996238 From one m<strong>en</strong>strual period to the next, are there certain days YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1wh<strong>en</strong> a woman is more lik<strong>el</strong>y to become pregnant if she has NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2sexual r<strong>el</strong>ations? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 301239 Is this time just before her period begins, during her period, right JUST BEFORE HER PERIODafter her period has <strong>en</strong>ded, or halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> two periods? BEGINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1DURING HER PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . 2RIGHT AFTER HERPERIOD HAS ENDED . . . . . . . . . . . . 3HALFWAY BETWEENTWO PERIODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER _________________________ 6(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8346 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 3. CONTRACEPTION301 Now I would like to talk about family planning - the various ways or methods that 302 Have you ever useda couple can use to d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoid a pregnancy.(METHOD)?Which ways or methods have you heard about?FOR METHODS NOT MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY, ASK:Have you ever heard of (METHOD)?CIRCLE CODE 1 IN 301 FOR EACH METHOD MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY.THEN PROCEED DOWN COLUMN 301, READING THE NAME AND DESCRIPTION OFEACH METHOD NOT MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY. CIRCLE CODE 1 IF METHODIS RECOGNIZED, AND CODE 2 IF NOT RECOGNIZED. THEN, FOR EACH METHODWITH CODE 1 CIRCLED IN 301, ASK 302.01 FEMALE STERILIZATION Wom<strong>en</strong> can have an operation to avoid YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever had an operation tohaving any more childr<strong>en</strong>. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 avoid having any more childr<strong>en</strong>?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 MALE STERILIZATION M<strong>en</strong> can have an operation to avoid having YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever had a partner who hadany more childr<strong>en</strong>. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 an operation to avoid having anymore childr<strong>en</strong>?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 PILL Wom<strong>en</strong> can take a pill every day to avoid becoming pregnant. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 IUD Wom<strong>en</strong> can have a loop or coil placed inside them by a doctor or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a nurse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 INJECTABLES Wom<strong>en</strong> can have an injection by a health provider YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1that stops them from becoming pregnant for one or more months. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 IMPLANTS Wom<strong>en</strong> can have several small rods placed in their upper YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1arm by a doctor or nurse which can prev<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy for one or more NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2years. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 CONDOM M<strong>en</strong> can put a rubber sheath on their p<strong>en</strong>is before sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 FEMALE CONDOM Wom<strong>en</strong> can place a sheath in their vagina before YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1sexual intercourse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD (LAM) YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2RHYTHM METHOD Every month that a woman is sexually active YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 she can avoid pregnancy by not having sexual intercourse NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2on the days of the month she is most lik<strong>el</strong>y to get pregnant. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 WITHDRAWAL M<strong>en</strong> can be careful and pull out before climax. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION As an emerg<strong>en</strong>cy measure after YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1unprotected sexual intercourse, wom<strong>en</strong> can take special pills at any NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2time within five days to prev<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 Have you heard of any other ways or methods that wom<strong>en</strong> or m<strong>en</strong> can YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1use to avoid pregnancy?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(SPECIFY) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(SPECIFY) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2303 CHECK 302:NOT A SINGLEAT LEAST ONE"YES" "YES" 307(NEVER USED)(EVER USED)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 347


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP304 Have you ever used anything or tried in any way to d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoid YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 306getting pregnant? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2305 ENTER '0' IN THE CALENDAR IN EACH BLANK MONTH. 333306 What have you used or done?CORRECT 302 AND 303 (AND 301 IF NECESSARY).307 Now I would like to ask you about the first time that you didsomething or used a method to avoid getting pregnant. NUMBER OF CHILDREN . . . . .How many living childr<strong>en</strong> did you have at that time, if any?IF NONE, RECORD '00'.308 CHECK 302 (01):WOMAN NOTWOMANSTERILIZED STERILIZED 311A309 CHECK 226:NOT PREGNANTPREGNANTOR UNSURE 322310 Are you curr<strong>en</strong>tly doing something or using any method to d<strong>el</strong>ay YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or avoid getting pregnant? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 322311 Which method are you using? FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . AMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . B 316CIRCLE ALL MENTIONED.PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DIF MORE THAN ONE METHOD MENTIONED, FOLLOW SKIP INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 315INSTRUCTION FOR HIGHEST METHOD IN LIST. IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FCONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G311A CIRCLE 'A' FOR FEMALE STERILIZATION. FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H 315LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA (LAM) IRHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LWITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M 319AOTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)312 RECORD IF CODE 'C' FOR PILL IS CIRCLED IN 311. PACKAGE SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1YES (USING NO (USING 314PILL) CONDOM BUT BRAND NAMENOT PILL)(SPECIFY)May I see the package May I see the package PACKAGE NOT SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 2of pills you are using?of condoms you are using?RECORD NAME OF BRAND IF PACKAGE SEEN.313 Do you know the brand name of the (pills/condoms) you areusing?RECORD NAME OF BRAND.BRAND NAME(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98314 How many (pill cycles/condoms) did you get NUMBER OF PILLthe last time? CYCLES/CONDOMS . . .DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998348 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP315 The last time you obtained (HIGHEST METHOD ON LIST IN 311),how much did you pay in total, including the cost of the method COST . . . . . . . . . . . .and any consultation you may have had?FREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9995DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998319A316 In what facility did the sterilization take place? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . 11PROBE TO IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF SOURCE AND CIRCLE GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . 12THE APPROPRIATE CODE. GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . 13IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER OTHER PUBLIC 16OR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITE(SPECIFY)THE NAME OF THE PLACE.PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . 21FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/(NAME OF PLACE) CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . 23NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . 25MOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31317 CHECK 311/311A:OTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98CODE 'A'CIRCLEDCODE 'A'NOT CIRCLEDBefore your sterilization Before the sterilization operation, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1operation, were you told was your husband/partner told NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2that you would not be able that he would not be able to DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8to have any (more) childr<strong>en</strong> have any (more) childr<strong>en</strong>because of the operation? because of the operation?318 How much did you (your husband/partner) pay in total for thesterilization, including any consultation you (he) may have had? COST . . . . . . . . . . . .319 In what month and year was the sterilization performed?FREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9995DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998319A Since what month and year have you be<strong>en</strong> using (CURRENT MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .METHOD) without stopping?YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .PROBE: For how long have you be<strong>en</strong> using (CURRENTMETHOD) now without stopping?320 CHECK 319/319A, 215 AND 230:ANY BIRTH OR PREGNANCY TERMINATION AFTER MONTH AND YES NOYEAR OF START OF USE OF CONTRACEPTION IN 319/319AGO BACK TO 319/319A, PROBE AND RECORD MONTH AND YEAR AT START OF CONTINUOUSUSE OF CURRENT METHOD (MUST BE AFTER LAST BIRTH OR PREGNANCY TERMINATION).App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 349


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP321 CHECK 319/319A:YEAR IS 2003 OR LATERYEAR IS 2002 OR EARLIERENTER CODE FOR METHOD USED IN MONTH OFENTER CODE FOR METHOD USED IN MONTH OFINTERVIEW IN THE CALENDAR AND ININTERVIEW IN THE CALENDAR ANDEACH MONTH BACK TO THE DATE STARTED USING. EACH MONTH BACK TO JANUARY 2003THEN SKIP TO331322 I would like to ask you some questions about the times you or your partner may have used a method to avoidgetting pregnant during the last few years.USE CALENDAR TO PROBE FOR EARLIER PERIODS OF USE AND NONUSE, STARTING WITH MOSTRECENT USE, BACK TO JANUARY 2003.USE NAMES OF CHILDREN, DATES OF BIRTH, AND PERIODS OF PREGNANCY AS REFERENCE POINTS.ENTER METHOD USE CODE OR '0' FOR NONUSE IN EACH BLANK MONTH.ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONS:* Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you used a method? Which method was that?* Wh<strong>en</strong> did you start using that method? How long after the birth of (NAME)?* How long did you use the method th<strong>en</strong>?323 CHECK 311/311A: NO CODE CIRCLED . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 333FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . 01 326CIRCLE METHOD CODE: MALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . 02 335PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03IF MORE THAN ONE METHOD CODE CIRCLED IN 311/311A, IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04CIRCLE CODE FOR HIGHEST METHOD IN LIST. INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA (LAM) 09 324ARHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 324AWITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 33596 335324 Where did you obtain (CURRENT METHOD) wh<strong>en</strong> you started PUBLIC SECTORusing it? GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . 11GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . 12GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . 13IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTEROR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITE OTHER PUBLIC 16THE NAME OF THE PLACE.(SPECIFY)PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSION(NAME OF PLACE) HOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . 21FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . 23PHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . 25324A Where did you learn how to use the rhythm/lactational OTHER SOURCEam<strong>en</strong>orrhoea method? MOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31COMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR 41SHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51FRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61OTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)350 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP325 CHECK 311/311A: PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04CIRCLE METHOD CODE: INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06IF MORE THAN ONE METHOD CODE CIRCLED IN 311/311A, CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07 332CIRCLE CODE FOR HIGHEST METHOD IN LIST. FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08 329LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA (LAM) 09 335RHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 335326 You obtained (CURRENT METHOD FROM 323) from (SOURCEOF METHOD FROM 316 OR 324) in (DATE FROM 319/319A). At YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 328that time, were you told about side effects or problems you NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2might have with the method?327 Were you ever told by a health or family planning worker about YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1side effects or problems you might have with the method? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 329328 Were you told what to do if you experi<strong>en</strong>ced side effects YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or problems? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2329 CHECK 326:CODE '1'CIRCLEDAt that time, were you toldabout other methods of familyplanning that you could use?CODE '1' NOTCIRCLEDWh<strong>en</strong> you obtained (CURRENTMETHOD FROM 323) from(SOURCE OF METHOD FROM316 OR 324) were you told YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 331about other methods of family NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2planning that you could use?330 Were you ever told by a health or family planning worker about YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1other methods of family planning that you could use? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2331 CHECK 311/311A: FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . 01MALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . 02 335CIRCLE METHOD CODE: PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04IF MORE THAN ONE METHOD CODE CIRCLED IN 311/311A, INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05CIRCLE CODE FOR HIGHEST METHOD IN LIST. IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA (LAM) 09RHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10WITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 335OTHER METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 351


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP332 Where did you obtain (CURRENT METHOD) the last time? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . 11PROBE TO IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF SOURCE AND CIRCLE GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . 12THE APPROPRIATE CODE. GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . 13IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER OTHER PUBLIC 16OR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITE(SPECIFY)THE NAME OF THE PLACE.PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . 21FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22(NAME OF PLACE) PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . 23PHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . 25335OTHER PRIV. MEDICAL 26(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31COMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR. 41SHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51FRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . 61OTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)333 Do you know of a place where you can obtain a method of family YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1planning? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 335334 Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . BAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . CGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . DPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE AND CIRCLETHE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). OTHER PUBLIC E(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTOROR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITEFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . FFHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/THE NAME OF THE PLACE.CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . HPHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . I(NAME OF PLACE(S)) NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . JOTHER PRIV. MEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LCOMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR MSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NFRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)335 In the last 12 months, were you visited by a fi<strong>el</strong>dworker who YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1talked to you about family planning? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2336 In the last 12 months, have you visited a health facility for care YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for yours<strong>el</strong>f (or your childr<strong>en</strong>)? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 401337 Did any staff member at the health facility speak to you about YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1family planning methods? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2352 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 4. PREGNANCY AND POSTNATAL CARE401 CHECK 224:ONE OR MORE NO 576BIRTHSBIRTHSIN 2003 IN 2003OR LATEROR LATER402 CHECK 215: ENTER IN THE TABLE THE LINE NUMBER, NAME, AND SURVIVAL STATUS OF EACH BIRTH IN 2003 ORLATER. ASK THE QUESTIONS ABOUT ALL OF THESE BIRTHS. BEGIN WITH THE LAST BIRTH.(IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 BIRTHS, USE LAST 2 COLUMNS OF ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRES).Now I would like to ask you some questions about the health of all your childr<strong>en</strong> born in the last five years. (We will talkabout each separat<strong>el</strong>y.)403 LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHLINE NUMBER FROM 212LINE NO. LINE NO. LINE NO.404 NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________FROM 212 AND 216LIVING DEAD LIVING DEAD LIVING DEAD405 At the time you became pregnant THEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 THEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 THEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1with (NAME), did you want to (SKIP TO 407) (SKIP TO 432) (SKIP TO 432)become pregnant th<strong>en</strong>, did you LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2want to wait until later, or didyou not want to have any (more) NOT AT ALL . . . . . 3 NOT AT ALL . . . . . 3 NOT AT ALL . . . . . 3childr<strong>en</strong> at all? (SKIP TO 407) (SKIP TO 432) (SKIP TO 432)406 How much longer would you hav<strong>el</strong>iked to wait? MONTHS . .1MONTHS . .1MONTHSYEARS . .2 YEARS . .2YEARS. .1. .2407 Did you see anyone for ant<strong>en</strong>atal HEALTH PERSONNELcare for this pregnancy? DOCTOR . . . . . . . ANURSE/MIDWIFE BIF YES: Whom did you see? OTHER PERSONAnyone <strong>el</strong>se?TRADITIONAL BIRTHATTENDANT . CCOMMUNITY HEALTHWORKER . . . . . DPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OTHER XOF PERSON AND RECORD ALL(SPECIFY)MENTIONED. NO ONE . . . . . . . . . Y(SKIP TO 414)DON'T KNOW . . . 998 DON'T KNOW . . . 998 DON'T KNOW . . . 998App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 353


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________408 Where did you receive ant<strong>en</strong>atal HOME . . . . . . . . . . . . Acare for this pregnancy?PUBLIC SECTORGOV. HOSPITAL BAnywhere <strong>el</strong>se?GOV. HEALTH CTR CGOV. DISPENSARY DPROBE TO IDENTIFY TYPE(S) OTHER PUBLICOF SOURCE(S) AND CIRCLETHE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). (SPECIFY) EPRIVATE MED SECTORIF UNABLE TO DETERMINEFAITH-BASED, CHURCH,IF A HOSPITAL, HEALTHHOSP./CLINIC . FCENTER, OR CLINIC ISPRIVATE HOSPITAL/PUBLIC OR PRIVATECLINIC . . . . . . HMEDICAL, WRITE THENURSING/MATERNITYTHE NAME OF THE PLACE. HOME . . . . . . . JOTHER PVT. MED.(NAME OF PLACE(S)) (SPECIFY) KOTHERX(SPECIFY)409 How many months pregnant wereyou wh<strong>en</strong> you first received MONTHS . . .ant<strong>en</strong>atal care for this pregnancy?DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98410 How many times did you receive NUMBERant<strong>en</strong>atal care during this OF TIMES .pregnancy?DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98411 As part of your ant<strong>en</strong>atal careduring this pregnancy, were any ofthe following done at least once? YES NOWere you weighed? WEIGHT . . . 1 2Was your height measured? HEIGHT . . . 1 2Was your blood pressure tak<strong>en</strong>? BP . . . . . . . 1 2Did you give a urine sample? URINE . . . . . 1 2Did you give a blood sample? BLOOD . . . 1 2412 Were you giv<strong>en</strong> any information YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or couns<strong>el</strong>led about breast- NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2feeding? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8412A During (any of) your ant<strong>en</strong>atal YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1care visit(s), were you told about NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2the signs of pregnancy (SKIP TO 414)complications? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8413 Were you told where to go if you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1had any of these complications? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8414 During this pregnancy, were you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1giv<strong>en</strong> an injection in the armto prev<strong>en</strong>t the baby from getting NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2tetanus, that is, convulsions (SKIP TO 417)after birth? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8354 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________415 During this pregnancy, how manytimes did you get this tetanus TIMES . . . . . . . . .injection?DON'T KNOW . . . 8416 CHECK 415: 2 OR MORE OTHERTIMES(SKIP TO 421)417 At any time before this pregnancy, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1did you receive any tetanus NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2injections, either to protect (SKIP TO 421)yours<strong>el</strong>f or another baby? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8418 Before this pregnancy, how manyother times did you receive a TIMES . . . . . . . . .tetanus injection?DON'T KNOW . . . 8IF 7 OR MORE TIMES, WRITE '7'.419 In what month and year did youreceive the last tetanus injection MONTH . . .before this pregnancy?DK MONTH . . . . . . . 98YEAR(SKIP TO 421)DK YEAR . . . . . . . 9998420 How many years ago did you YEARSreceive that tetanus injection? AGO . . . . .421 During this pregnancy, were you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1giv<strong>en</strong> or did you buy any irontablets or iron syrup? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 423)SHOW TABLETS/SYRUP. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8422 During the whole pregnancy, forhow many days did you take the DAYS .tablets or syrup?DON'T KNOW . . . 998IF ANSWER IS NOT NUMERIC,PROBE FOR APPROXIMATENUMBER OF DAYS.423 During this pregnancy, did you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1take any drug for intestinal NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2worms? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8424 During this pregnancy, did you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1have difficulty with your vision NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2during daylight? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8425 During this pregnancy, did you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1suffer from night blindness? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 355


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________426 During this pregnancy, did you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1take any drugs to keep youfrom getting malaria? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 432)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8427 What drugs did you take? SP/FANSIDAR . . . . . ACHLOROQUINE . . . BRECORD ALL MENTIONED.IF TYPE OF DRUG IS NOT OTHER XDETERMINED, SHOW TYPICAL(SPECIFY)ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS TO DON'T KNOW . . . . . . ZRESPONDENT.428 CHECK 427: CODE 'A' CODECIRCLED A' NOTDRUGS TAKEN FOR MALARIACIRCLEDPREVENTION.(SKIP TO 432)429 How many times did you take(SP/Fansidar) during this TIMES . . . . .pregnancy?430 CHECK 407: CODE 'A' OTHEROR 'B'ANTENATAL CARE FROMCIRCLEDHEALTH PERSONNELDURING THIS PREGNANCY(SKIP TO 432)431 Did you get the (SP/Fansidar) ANTENATAL VISIT . . 1during any ant<strong>en</strong>atal care visit, ANOTHER FACILITYduring another visit to a health VISIT . . . . . . . . . 2facility or from another source? OTHER SOURCE . .. . 6432 Wh<strong>en</strong> (NAME) was born, was VERY LARGE . . . . . 1 VERY LARGE . . . . . 1 VERY LARGE . . . . . 1he/she very large, larger than LARGER THAN LARGER THAN LARGER THANaverage, average, smaller than AVERAGE . . . . . 2 AVERAGE . . . . . 2 AVERAGE . . . . . 2average, or very small? AVERAGE . . . . . . . 3 AVERAGE . . . . . . . 3 AVERAGE . . . . . . . 3SMALLER THAN SMALLER THAN SMALLER THANAVERAGE . . . . . 4 AVERAGE . . . . . 4 AVERAGE . . . . . 4VERY SMALL . . . . . 5 VERY SMALL . . . . . 5 VERY SMALL . . . . . 5DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8433 Was (NAME) weighed at birth? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 435) (SKIP TO 435) (SKIP TO 435)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8434 How much did (NAME) weigh? KG FROM CARD KG FROM CARD KG FROM CARDRECORD WEIGHT IN 1 . 1 . 1 .KILOGRAMS FROM HEALTHCARD, IF AVAILABLE.KG FROM RECALL KG FROM RECALL KG FROM RECALL2. 2 . 2 .DON'T KNOW . 99.998 DON'T KNOW . 99.998 DON'T KNOW . 99.998356 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________435 Who assisted with the d<strong>el</strong>ivery HEALTH PERSONNEL HEALTH PERSONNEL HEALTH PERSONNELof (NAME)? DOCTOR . . . . . A DOCTOR . . . . . A DOCTOR . . . . . ANURSE/MIDWIFE. B NURSE/MIDWIFE . B NURSE/MIDWIFE. BAnyone <strong>el</strong>se? OTHER PERSON OTHER PERSON OTHER PERSONPROBE FOR THE TYPE(S) OF TRADITIONAL BIRTH TRADITIONAL BIRTH TRADITIONAL BIRTHPERSON(S) AND RECORD ALL ATTENDANT . . C ATTENDANT . . C ATTENDANT . . CMENTIONED. COMMUNITY HLTH COMMUNITY HLTH COMMUNITY HLTHWORKER . . . D WORKER . . . D WORKER . . . DRELATIVE/FRIEND E RELATIVE/FRIEND .E RELATIVE/FRIEND EOTHER OTHER OTHERIF RESPONDENT SAYS NO ONE X X XASSISTED, PROBE TO SEE IF (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)ANY ADULTS WERE PRESENT NO ONE . . . . . . . . . Y NO ONE . . . . . . . . . Y NO ONE . . . . . . . . . YAT THE DELIVERY.436 Where did you give birth to HOME HOME HOME(NAME)? YOUR HOME . . . 11 YOUR HOME . . . 11 YOUR HOME . . . 11(SKIP TO 443) (SKIP TO 444) (SKIP TO 444)PROBE TO IDENTIFY THE TYPE OTHER HOME . . . 12 OTHER HOME . . . 12 OTHER HOME . . . 12OF SOURCE AND CIRCLE THEAPPROPRIATE CODE. PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTORGOVT. HOSPITAL 21 GOVT. HOSPITAL 21 GOVT. HOSPITAL 21IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE GOVT. HEALTH GOVT. HEALTH GOVT. HEALTHIF A HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER . . . . . 22 CENTER . . . . . 22 CENTER . . . . . 22CENTER, OR CLINIC IS GOVT. DIS- GOVT. DIS- GOVT. DIS-PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PENSARY . . . 23 PENSARY . . . 23 PENSARY . . . 23MEDICAL, WRITE THE OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLICTHE NAME OF THE PLACE. 26 26 26(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)(NAME OF PLACE) PRIVATE MED. SECTOR PRIVATE MED. SECTOR PRIVATE MED. SECTORMISSION HOSPITAL/ MISSION HOSPITAL/ MISSION HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . 31 CLINIC . . . . . . . 31 CLINIC . . . . . . . 31PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . 33 CLINIC . . . . . . . 33 CLINIC . . . . . . . 33NURSING/MATERNITY NURSING/MATERNITY NURSING/MATERNITYHOME . . . . . . . 35 HOME . . . . . . . 35 HOME . . . . . . . 35OTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATEMED. 36 MED. 36 MED. 36(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)OTHER 96 OTHER 96 OTHER 96(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)(SKIP TO 443) (SKIP TO 444) (SKIP TO 444)437 How long after (NAME) wasd<strong>el</strong>ivered did you stay there? HOURS 1 HOURS 1 HOURS 1IF LESS THAN ONE DAY, DAYS 2 DAYS 2 DAYS 2RECORD HOURS.IF LESS THAN ONE WEEK, WEEKS 3 WEEKS 3 WEEKS 3RECORD DAYS.DON'T KNOW . 998 DON'T KNOW . . . 998 DON'T KNOW . . . 998438 Was (NAME) d<strong>el</strong>ivered by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1caesarean section? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2439 Before you were discharged after YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME) was born, did any health NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (SKIP TO 455) (SKIP TO 455)care provider check on your health? (SKIP TO 442) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 357


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________440 How long after d<strong>el</strong>iverydid the first check take place? HOURS 1DAYS 2IF LESS THAN ONE DAY,RECORD HOURS. WEEKS 3IF LESS THAN ONE WEEK,RECORD DAYS. DON'T KNOW . . . 998441 Who checked on your health HEALTH PERSONNELat that time? DOCTOR . . . . . . . 11NURSE/MIDWIFE 12PROBE FOR MOST QUALIFIED OTHER PERSONPERSON.TRADITIONAL BIRTHATTENDANT . 21COMMUNITY HLTHWORKER . . . 22OTHER 96(SPECIFY)(SKIP TO 453)442 After you were discharged, did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1any health care provider or (SKIP TO 445) (SKIP TO 455) (SKIP TO 455)a traditional birth att<strong>en</strong>dant NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2check on your health? (SKIP TO 453)443 Why didn't you d<strong>el</strong>iver in a health COST TOO MUCH . . Afacility?FACILITY NOT OPEN . BTOO FAR/ NO TRANS-PORTATIONCPROBE: Any other reason?DON'T TRUSTFACILITY/POORRECORD ALL MENTIONED.QUALITY SERVICE DNO FEMALE PROVID-ER AT FACILITY . . EHUSBAND/FAMILYDID NOT ALLOW . . FNOT NECESSARY . . GNOT CUSTOMARY . . HOTHER(SPECIFY) X444 After (NAME) was born, didany health care provider or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a traditional birth att<strong>en</strong>dant NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2check on your health? (SKIP TO 449)445 How long after d<strong>el</strong>ivery didthe first check take place? HOURS 1DAYS 2IF LESS THAN ONE DAY,RECORD HOURS. WEEKS 3IF LESS THAN ONE WEEK,RECORD DAYS. DON'T KNOW . . . 998358 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________446 Who checked on your health HEALTH PERSONNELat that time? DOCTOR . . . . . . . 11NURSE/MIDWIFE 12PROBE FOR MOST QUALIFIED OTHER PERSONPERSON.TRADITIONAL BIRTHATTENDANT . 21COMMUNITY HLTHWORKER . . . 22OTHER 96(SPECIFY)447 Where did this first check HOMEtake place? YOUR HOME . . . 11OTHER HOME . . . 12PROBE TO IDENTIFY THE TYPEOF SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE PUBLIC SECTORAPPROPRIATE CODE. GOVT. HOSPITAL 21GOVT. HEALTHIF UNABLE TO DETERMINE CENTER . . . . . 22IF A HOSPITAL, HEALTHGOVT. DIS-CENTER, OR CLINIC IS PENSARY . . . 23PUBLIC OR PRIVATEOTHER PUBLICMEDICAL, WRITE THE 26THE NAME OF THE PLACE.(SPECIFY)(NAME OF PLACE)PRIVATE MED. SECTORMISSION HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . 31PVT. HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . 33NURSING/MATERNITYHOME . . . . . . . 35OTHER PRIVATEMED. 36(SPECIFY)OTHER 96(SPECIFY)448 CHECK 442: YESNOT ASKED(SKIP TO 453)449 In the two months after (NAME)was born, did any health YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1care provider or a traditional birth NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2att<strong>en</strong>dant check on his/her (SKIP TO 453)health? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8450 How many hours, days or weeksafter the birth of (NAME) did the HOURS 1first check take place?DAYS 2IF LESS THAN ONE DAY,RECORD HOURS. WEEKS 3IF LESS THAN ONE WEEK,RECORD DAYS. DON'T KNOW . . . 998App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 359


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________451 Who checked on (NAME)'s health HEALTH PERSONNELat that time? DOCTOR . . . . . . . 11NURSE/MIDWIFE 12PROBE FOR MOST QUALIFIED OTHER PERSONPERSON.TRADITIONAL BIRTHATTENDANT . 21COMMUNITY HLTHWORKER . . . 22OTHER 96(SPECIFY)452 Where did this first check of HOME(NAME) take place? YOUR HOME . . . 11OTHER HOME . . . 12PROBE TO IDENTIFY THE TYPEOF SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE PUBLIC SECTORAPPROPRIATE CODE. GOVT. HOSPITAL 21GOVT. HEALTHIF UNABLE TO DETERMINE CENTER . . . . . 22IF A HOSPITAL, HEALTHGOVT. DIS-CENTER, OR CLINIC IS PENSARY . . . 23PUBLIC OR PRIVATEOTHER PUBLICMEDICAL, WRITE THE 26THE NAME OF THE PLACE.(SPECIFY)(NAME OF PLACE)PRIVATE MED. SECTORFAITH-BASED, CHURCHHOSP/CLINIC . 31PVT. HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . 33NURSING/MATERNITYHOME . . . . . . . 35OTHER PRIVATEMED. 36(SPECIFY)OTHER 96(SPECIFY)453 In the first two months afterd<strong>el</strong>ivery, did you receive a YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1vitamin A dose (like this)?NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SHOW COMMON TYPES OFAMPULES/CAPSULES/SYRUPS. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8454 Has your m<strong>en</strong>strual period returned YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1since the birth of (NAME)? (SKIP TO 456)NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 457)455 Did your period return betwe<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1the birth of (NAME) and your NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2next pregnancy? (SKIP TO 459) (SKIP TO 459)456 For how many months after thebirth of (NAME) did you not have MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . .a period?DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98360 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________457 CHECK 226: NOT PREGNANTPREG- ORIS RESPONDENT PREGNANT? NANT UNSURE(SKIP TO 459)458 Have you begun to have YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1sexual intercourse again since NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2the birth of (NAME)? (SKIP TO 460)459 For how many months after thebirth of (NAME) did you not have MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . .sexual intercourse?DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98460 Did you ever breastfeed (NAME)? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 467) (SKIP TO 467) (SKIP TO 467)461 How long after birth did you firstput (NAME) to the breast?IMMEDIATELY . . . 000IF LESS THAN 1 HOUR,RECORD ‘00' HOURS.IF LESS THAN 24 HOURS, HOURS 1RECORD HOURS.OTHERWISE, RECORD DAYS. DAYS 2462 In the first three days after YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1d<strong>el</strong>ivery, was (NAME) giv<strong>en</strong> NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2anything to drink other than (SKIP TO 464)breast milk?463 What was (NAME) giv<strong>en</strong> to drink? MILK (OTHER THANBREAST MILK ) . AAnything <strong>el</strong>se? PLAIN WATER . . . BSUGAR OR GLU-RECORD ALL LIQUIDSCOSE WATER . . . CMENTIONED. GRIPE WATER . . . DSUGAR-SALT-WATERSOLUTION . . . . . EFRUIT JUICE . . . . . FINFANT FORMULA . GTEA/INFUSIONS . . . HHONEY . . . . . . . . . IOTHER(SPECIFY)X464 CHECK 404: LIVING DEADIS CHILD LIVING? (SKIP TO 466)465 Are you still breastfeeding YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME)? (SKIP TO 468)NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2466 For how many months did youbreastfeed (NAME)? MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . . MONTHS . . .STILL BF . . . . . . . 95 STILL BF . . . . . . . 95DON'T KNOW . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . 98App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 361


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________467 CHECK 404: LIVING DEAD LIVING DEAD LIVING DEADIS CHILD LIVING?468 How many times did youbreastfeed last night betwe<strong>en</strong>sunset and sunrise?IF ANSWER IS NOT NUMERIC,PROBE FOR APPROXIMATENUMBER.469 How many times did youbreastfeed yesterday duringthe daylight hours?IF ANSWER IS NOT NUMERIC,PROBE FOR APPROXIMATENUMBER.(GO BACK TO (GO BACK TO (GO BACK TO 405405 IN NEXT 405 IN NEXT IN NEXT-TO-LASTCOLUMN; OR, COLUMN; OR, COLUMN OF NEWIF NO MORE IF NO MORE QUESTIONNAIRE; OR,BIRTHS, GO BIRTHS, GO IF NO MORE(SKIP TO 470) TO 501) (SKIP TO 470) TO 501) (SKIP TO 470) BIRTHS,GO TO 501)NUMBER OFNIGHTTIMEFEEDINGS .NUMBER OFDAYLIGHTFEEDINGS .470 Did (NAME) drink anything from YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a bottle with a nipple yesterday NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or last night? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8471 GO BACK TO 405 IN GO BACK TO 405 IN GO BACK TO 405 INNEXT COLUMN; OR, IF NEXT COLUMN; OR, IF NEXT-TO-LASTNO MORE BIRTHS, GO NO MORE BIRTHS, GO COLUMN OF NEWTO 501. TO 501. QUESTIONNAIRE; OR,IF NO MORE BIRTHS,GO TO 501.362 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 5. IMMUNIZATION, HEALTH AND NUTRITION501 ENTER IN THE TABLE THE LINE NUMBER, NAME, AND SURVIVAL STATUS OF EACH BIRTH IN 2003 OR LATER.ASK THE QUESTIONS ABOUT ALL OF THESE BIRTHS. BEGIN WITH THE LAST BIRTH.(IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 3 BIRTHS, USE LAST 2 COLUMNS OF ADDITIONAL QUESTIONNAIRES).502 LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHLINE NUMBER LINE LINE LINEFROM 212 NUMBER . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . . . NUMBER . . . . . . .503 NAME NAME NAMEFROM 212AND 216 LIVING DEAD LIVING DEAD LIVING DEAD(GO TO 503 (GO TO 503 (GO TO 503 IN NEXT-IN NEXT COLUMN IN NEXT COLUMN TO-LAST COLUMN OFOR, IF NO MORE OR, IF NO MORE NEW QUESTIONNAIRE,BIRTHS, GO TO 573) BIRTHS, GO TO 573) OR IF NO MOREBIRTHS, GO TO 573)504 Do you have a childw<strong>el</strong>fare card with YES, SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES, SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES, SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME)'s vaccina- (SKIP TO 506) (SKIP TO 506) (SKIP TO 506)tions? YES, NOT SEEN . . . . . . . . 2 YES, NOT SEEN . . . . . . . . 2 YES, NOT SEEN . . . . . . . 2IF YES: (SKIP TO 508) (SKIP TO 508) (SKIP TO 508)May I see it please? NO CARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 NO CARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 NO CARD . . . . . . . . . . . . 3505 Did you ever have a YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1vaccination card (SKIP TO 508) (SKIP TO 508) (SKIP TO 508)for (NAME)? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2506 (1) COPY VACCINATION DATE FOR EACH VACCINE FROM THE CARD.(2) WRITE ‘44' IN ‘DAY' COLUMN IF CARD SHOWS THAT A VACCINATION WAS GIVEN, BUT NO DATE IS RECORDED.(3) IF MORE THAN TWO VITAMIN 'A' DOSES, RECORD DATES FOR MOST RECENT AND SECOND MOST RECENT DOSES.LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHDAY MONTH YEAR DAY MONTH YEAR DAY MONTH YEARBCGDPT, HEPATITIS,HIB, 1st DOSEDPT, HEPATITIS,HIB, 2nd DOSEDPT, HEPATITIS,HIB, 3rd DOSEPOLIO 0 (POLIOGIVEN AT BIRTH)OPV 1OPV 2OPV 3MEASLESVITAMIN A(MOST RECENT)VITAMIN A (2ndMOST RECENT)YELLOW FEVERBCGD1D2D3P0P1P2P3MEAVIT AVIT ABCGD1D2D3P0P1P2P3MEAVIT AVIT A506A CHECK 506: BCG TO MEASLES OTHER BCG TO MEASLES OTHER BCG TO MEASLES OTHERALL RECORDED ALL RECORDED ALL RECORDED(GO TO 510) (GO TO 510) (GO TO 510)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 363


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________507 Has (NAME) received any YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1vaccinations that are not recorded (PROBE FOR (PROBE FOR (PROBE FORon this card, including vaccinations VACCINATIONS AND VACCINATIONS AND VACCINATIONS ANDreceived in a national WRITE ‘66' IN THE WRITE ‘66' IN THE WRITE ‘66' IN THEimmunization day campaign? CORRESPONDING CORRESPONDING CORRESPONDINGDAY COLUMN IN 506) DAY COLUMN IN 506) DAY COLUMN IN 506)RECORD ‘YES' ONLY IF (SKIP TO 510) (SKIP TO 510) (SKIP TO 510)RESPONDENT MENTIONS BCG,POLIO 0-3, DPT 1-3, AND/OR NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2MEASLES VACCINES. (SKIP TO 510) (SKIP TO 510) (SKIP TO 510)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8508 Did (NAME) ever receive anyvaccinations to prev<strong>en</strong>t him/herfrom getting diseases, including YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1vaccinations received in a NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2national immunization (SKIP TO 512) (SKIP TO 512) (SKIP TO 512)campaign? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8509 Please t<strong>el</strong>l me if (NAME) receivedany of the following vaccinations:509A A BCG vaccination against YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1tuberculosis, that is, an injection NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2in the arm or shoulder that usually DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8causes a scar?509B Polio vaccine, that is, drops in the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1mouth? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 509E) (SKIP TO 509E) (SKIP TO 509E)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8509C Was the first polio vaccine FIRST 2 WEEKS . . . 1 FIRST 2 WEEKS . . . 1 FIRST 2 WEEKS . . . 1received in the first two weeks LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 LATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2after birth or later?509D How many times was the polio NUMBER NUMBER NUMBERvaccine received? OF TIMES . . . . . OF TIMES . . . . . OF TIMES . . . . .509E A P<strong>en</strong>taval<strong>en</strong>t vaccination, that is YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1an injection giv<strong>en</strong> in the thigh, NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2sometimes at the same time as (SKIP TO 509G) (SKIP TO 509G) (SKIP TO 509G)polio drops? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8509F How many times was a P<strong>en</strong>ta NUMBER NUMBER NUMBERval<strong>en</strong>t vaccination received? OF TIMES . . . . . OF TIMES . . . . . OF TIMES . . . . .509G A measles injection- that is , a YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1shot in the right upper arm at the NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2age of 9 months or older - to DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8prev<strong>en</strong>t him/her from gettingmeasles?510 Were any of the vaccinations YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME) received during the last NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2two years giv<strong>en</strong> as part of a NO VACCINATION IN NO VACCINATION IN NO VACCINATION INnational immunization day THE LAST 2 YRS. 3 THE LAST 2 YRS. 3 THE LAST 2 YRS. 3campaign? DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8364 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________512 CHECK 506: DATE DATE DATEFOR OTHER FOR OTHER FOR OTHERDATE SHOWN FOR VITAMIN MOST MOST MOSTA DOSE RECENT RECENT RECENTVITAMIN VITAMIN VITAMINA DOSE A DOSE A DOSE(SKIP TO (SKIP TO (SKIP TO514) 514) 514)513 According to (NAME)'s health card,he/she received a vitamin A dose(like this/any of these) in (MONTHAND YEAR OF MOST RECENTDOSE FROM CARD). YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Has (NAME) received another (SKIP TO 515) (SKIP TO 515) (SKIP TO 515)vitamin A dose since th<strong>en</strong>? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SHOW COMMON TYPES OF (SKIP TO 516) (SKIP TO 516) (SKIP TO 516)AMPULES/CAPSULES/SYRUPS. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8514 HAS (NAME) ever receiveda vitamin A dose (like this/ YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1any of these)? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SHOW COMMON TYPES OF (SKIP TO 516) (SKIP TO 516) (SKIP TO 516)AMPULES/CAPSULES/SYRUPS. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8515 Did (NAME) receive a vitamin A YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1dose within the last six months? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8516 In the last sev<strong>en</strong> days, did(NAME) take iron pills, sprinkleswith iron, or iron syrup(like this/any of these)? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1SHOW COMMON TYPES OF NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2PILLS/SPRINKLES/SYRUPS DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8517 Has (NAME) tak<strong>en</strong> any drug for YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intestinal worms in the last six NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2months? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8518 Has (NAME) had diarrhoea in the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1last 2 weeks? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8519 Was there any blood in the stools? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8520 Now I would like to know howmuch (NAME) was giv<strong>en</strong> to drinkduring the diarrhoea (includingbreastmilk).Was he/she giv<strong>en</strong> less thanusual to drink, about the same MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1amount, or more than usual to SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2drink? ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3IF LESS, PROBE: Was he/she MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4giv<strong>en</strong> much less than usual to NOTHING TO DRINK 5 NOTHING TO DRINK 5 NOTHING TO DRINK 5drink or somewhat less? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 365


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________521 Wh<strong>en</strong> (NAME) had diarrhoea, washe/she giv<strong>en</strong> less than usual to MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1eat, about the same amount, more SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2than usual, or nothing to eat? ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4IF LESS, PROBE: Was he/she STOPPED FOOD . 5 STOPPED FOOD . 5 STOPPED FOOD . 5giv<strong>en</strong> much less than usual to NEVER GAVE FOOD 6 NEVER GAVE FOOD 6 NEVER GAVE FOOD 6eat or somewhat less? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8522 Did you seek advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for the diarrhoea from any source? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 527) (SKIP TO 527) (SKIP TO 527)523 Where did you seek advice or PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTORtreatm<strong>en</strong>t? GOVT HOSPITAL B GOVT HOSPITAL B GOVT HOSPITAL BGOVT HEALTH GOVT HEALTH GOVT HEALTHAnywhere <strong>el</strong>se? CENTER . . . . . C CENTER . . . . . C CENTER . . . . . CGOVT DISPENS- GOVT DISPENS- GOVT DISPENS-PROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH ARY . . . . . . . D ARY . . . . . . . D ARY . . . . . . . DTYPE OF SOURCE AND OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLICCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE E E ECODE(S). (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)PRIVATE MEDICAL PRIVATE MEDICAL PRIVATE MEDICALIF UNABLE TO DETERMINE SECTOR SECTOR SECTORIF A HOSPITAL, HEALTH MISSION HOSP./ MISSION HOSP./ MISSION HOSP./CENTER, OR CLINIC IS CLINIC . . . . . . . F CLINIC . . . . . . . F CLINIC . . . . . . . FPUBLIC OR PRIVATE PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/MEDICAL, WRITE THE CLINIC . . . . . . . H CLINIC . . . . . . . H CLINIC . . . . . . . HTHE NAME OF THE PLACE. PHARMACY . . . I PHARMACY . . . I PHARMACY . . . IOTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATEMED. K MED. K MED. K(NAME OF PLACE(S)) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)MOBILE CLINIC . . . L MOBILE CLINIC . . . L MOBILE CLINIC . . . LCOMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTHWORKER . . . . . . . M WORKER . . . . . . . M WORKER . . . . . . . MOTHER SOURCE OTHER SOURCE OTHER SOURCESHOP . . . . . . . . . N SHOP . . . . . . . . . N SHOP . . . . . . . . . NTRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL TRADITIONALPRACTITIONER O PRACTITIONER O PRACTITIONER ORELATIVE/FRIEND P RELATIVE/FRIEND P RELATIVE/FRIEND POTHER X OTHER X OTHER X(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)524 CHECK 523: TWO OR ONLY TWO OR ONLY TWO OR ONLYMORE ONE MORE ONE MORE ONECODES CODE CODES CODE CODES CODECIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 526) (SKIP TO 526) (SKIP TO 526)525 Where did you first seek advice ortreatm<strong>en</strong>t?USE LETTER CODE FROM 523.FIRST PLACE . . . FIRST PLACE . . . FIRST PLACE . . .366 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________526 How many days after the diarrhoeabegan did you first seek adviceor treatm<strong>en</strong>t for (NAME)? DAYS . . . . . DAYS . . . . . DAYS . . . . .IF THE SAME DAY, RECORD '00'.527 Does (NAME) still have diarrhoea? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8528 Was he/she giv<strong>en</strong> any of thefollowing to drink at any time sincehe/she started having the diarrhoea:YES NO DK YES NO DK YES NO DKa)b)c)A fluid made from a special FLUID FROM FLUID FROM FLUID FROMpacket called Oralite or ORS? ORS PKT . . 1 2 8 ORS PKT . . 1 2 8 ORS PKT . . 1 2 8A home-made sugar-salt SUGAR-SALT SUGAR-SALT SUGAR-SALTsolution? SOL'N . . . 1 2 8 SOL'N . . . 1 2 8 SOL'N . . . 1 2 8Another home-made liquid suchas porridge, soup, yoghurt,coconut water, fresh fruit HOMEMADE HOMEMADE HOMEMADEjuice, tea, milk, or rice water? FLUID . . . 1 2 8 FLUID . . . 1 2 8 FLUID . . . 1 2 8529 Was anything (<strong>el</strong>se) giv<strong>en</strong> to YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1treat the diarrhea? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8530 What (<strong>el</strong>se) was giv<strong>en</strong> to treat PILL OR SYRUP PILL OR SYRUP PILL OR SYRUPthe diarrhoea? ANTIBIOTIC ..... . . . . A ANTIBIOTIC ..... . . . . A ANTIBIOTIC ..... . . . . AANTIMOTILITY . B ANTIMOTILITY . B ANTIMOTILITY . BAnything <strong>el</strong>se? ZINC . . . . . . . . . C ZINC . . . . . . . . . C ZINC . . . . . . . . . COTHER (NOT ANTI- OTHER (NOT ANTI- OTHER (NOT ANTI-RECORD ALL TREATMENTS BIOTIC, ANTI- BIOTIC, ANTI- BIOTIC, ANTI-GIVEN. MOTILITY, OR MOTILITY, OR MOTILITY, ORZINC) . . . . . . . D ZINC) . . . . . . . D ZINC) . . . . . . . DUNKNOWN PILL UNKNOWN PILL UNKNOWN PILLOR SYRUP . . . E OR SYRUP . . . E OR SYRUP . . . EINJECTION INJECTION INJECTIONANTIBIOTIC . . . . . F ANTIBIOTIC . . . . . F ANTIBIOTIC . . . . . FNON-ANTIBIOTIC. G NON-ANTIBIOTIC. G NON-ANTIBIOTIC. GUNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWNINJECTION . . . H INJECTION . . . H INJECTION . . . H(IV) INTRAVENOUS . I (IV) INTRAVENOUS . I (IV) INTRAVENOUS . IHOME REMEDY/ HOME REMEDY/ HOME REMEDY/HERBAL MED- HERBAL MED- HERBAL MED-ICINE . . . . . . . . . J ICINE . . . . . . . . . J ICINE . . . . . . . . . JOTHER X OTHER X OTHER X(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)531 CHECK 530: CODE "C" CODE "C" CODE "C" CODE "C" CODE "C" CODE "C"CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTCIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLEDGIVEN ZINC?(SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533) (SKIP TO 533)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 367


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________532 How many times was(NAME) giv<strong>en</strong> zinc? TIMES . . . . . TIMES . . . . . TIMES . . . . .DON'T KNOW . . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . . 98533 Has (NAME) be<strong>en</strong> ill with a fever YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1at any time in the last 2 weeks? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8534 Has (NAME) had an illness with YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a cough at any time in the NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2last 2 weeks? (SKIP TO 537) (SKIP TO 537) (SKIP TO 537)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8535 Wh<strong>en</strong> (NAME) had an illness with YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a cough, did he/she breathe faster NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2than usual with short, rapid breaths (SKIP TO 538) (SKIP TO 538) (SKIP TO 538)or have difficulty breathing? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8536 Was the fast or difficult breathing CHEST ONLY . . . 1 CHEST ONLY . . . 1 CHEST ONLY . . . 1due to a problem in the chest or to NOSE ONLY . . . . . 2 NOSE ONLY . . . . . 2 NOSE ONLY . . . . . 2a blocked or runny nose? BOTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 BOTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 BOTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER 6 OTHER 6 OTHER 6(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8(SKIP TO 538) (SKIP TO 538) (SKIP TO 538)537 CHECK 533: YES NO OR DK YES NO OR DK YES NO OR DKHAD FEVER?(GO BACK TO (GO BACK TO (GO TO 503503 IN NEXT 503 IN NEXT IN NEXT-TO-LASTCOLUMN; OR, COLUMN; OR, COLUMN OF NEWIF NO MORE IF NO MORE QUESTIONNAIRE; OR,BIRTHS, GO BIRTHS, GO IF NO MORE BIRTHS,TO 573) TO 573) GO TO 573)538 Now I would like to know howmuch (NAME) was giv<strong>en</strong> to drink(including breastmilk) during theillness with a (fever/cough).Was he/she giv<strong>en</strong> less thanusual to drink, about the same MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1amount, or more than usual to SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2drink? ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3IF LESS, PROBE: Was he/she MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4giv<strong>en</strong> much less than usual to NOTHING TO DRINK 5 NOTHING TO DRINK 5 NOTHING TO DRINK 5drink or somewhat less? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8539 Wh<strong>en</strong> (NAME) had a(fever/cough), was he/she giv<strong>en</strong>less than usual to eat, about the MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1 MUCH LESS . . . . . 1same amount, more than usual, SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2 SOMEWHAT LESS . 2or nothing to eat? ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3 ABOUT THE SAME . 3MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 MORE . . . . . . . . . . . . 4IF LESS, PROBE: Was he/she STOPPED FOOD . 5 STOPPED FOOD . 5 STOPPED FOOD . 5giv<strong>en</strong> much less than usual to NEVER GAVE FOOD 6 NEVER GAVE FOOD 6 NEVER GAVE FOOD 6eat or somewhat less? DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8540 Did you seek advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for the illness from any source? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 545) (SKIP TO 545) (SKIP TO 545)368 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________541 Where did you seek advice or PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTORtreatm<strong>en</strong>t? GOVT HOSPITAL B GOVT HOSPITAL B GOVT HOSPITAL BGOVT HEALTH GOVT HEALTH GOVT HEALTHAnywhere <strong>el</strong>se? CENTER . . . . . C CENTER . . . . . C CENTER . . . . . CGOVT DISPENS- GOVT DISPENS- GOVT DISPENS-PROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH ARY . . . . . . . D ARY . . . . . . . D ARY . . . . . . . DTYPE OF SOURCE AND OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLIC OTHER PUBLICCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE E E ECODE(S). (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)PRIVATE MEDICAL PRIVATE MEDICAL PRIVATE MEDICALIF UNABLE TO DETERMINE SECTOR SECTOR SECTORIF A HOSPITAL, HEALTH MISSION HOSP./ MISSION HOSP./ MISSION HOSP./CENTER, OR CLINIC IS CLINIC . . . . . . . F CLINIC . . . . . . . F CLINIC . . . . . . . FPUBLIC OR PRIVATE PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/ PVT. HOSPITAL/MEDICAL, WRITE THE CLINIC . . . . . . . H CLINIC . . . . . . . H CLINIC . . . . . . . HTHE NAME OF THE PLACE. PHARMACY . . . I PHARMACY . . . I PHARMACY . . . IOTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATE OTHER PRIVATEMED. K MED. K MED. K(NAME OF PLACE(S)) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)MOBILE CLINIC . . . L MOBILE CLINIC . . . L MOBILE CLINIC . . . LCOMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMUNITY HEALTHWORKER . . . . . . . M WORKER . . . . . . . M WORKER . . . . . . . MOTHER SOURCE OTHER SOURCE OTHER SOURCESHOP . . . . . . . . . N SHOP . . . . . . . . . N SHOP . . . . . . . . . NTRADITIONAL TRADITIONAL TRADITIONALPRACTITIONER O PRACTITIONER O PRACTITIONER ORELATIVE/FRIEND P RELATIVE/FRIEND P RELATIVE/FRIEND POTHER X OTHER X OTHER X(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)542 CHECK 541: TWO OR ONLY TWO OR ONLY TWO OR ONLYMORE ONE MORE ONE MORE ONECODES CODE CODES CODE CODES CODECIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 544) (SKIP TO 544) (SKIP TO 544)543 Where did you first seek adviceor treatm<strong>en</strong>t?USE LETTER CODE FROM 541.FIRST PLACE . . . FIRST PLACE . . . FIRST PLACE . . .544 How many days after the illnessbegan did you first seek adviceor treatm<strong>en</strong>t for (NAME)? DAYS . . . . . DAYS . . . . . DAYS . . . . .IF THE SAME DAY, RECORD '00'.545 Is (NAME) still sick with a (fever/ FEVER ONLY . . . . . 1 FEVER ONLY . . . . . 1 FEVER ONLY . . . . . 1cough)? COUGH ONLY . . . 2 COUGH ONLY . . . 2 COUGH ONLY . . . 2BOTH FEVER AND BOTH FEVER AND BOTH FEVER ANDCOUGH . . . . . . . 3 COUGH . . . . . . . 3 COUGH . . . . . . . 3NO, NEITHER . . . . . 4 NO, NEITHER . . . . . 4 NO, NEITHER . . . . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8546 At any time during the illness, did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME) take any drugs for the NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2illness? (GO BACK TO 503 (GO BACK TO 503 (GO TO 503 ININ NEXT COLUMN; IN NEXT COLUMN; NEXT-TO-LASTOR, IF NO MORE OR, IF NO MORE COLUMN OF NEWBIRTHS, GO TO 573) BIRTHS, GO TO 573) QUESTIONNAIRE;DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 OR, IF NO MOREBIRTHS, GO TO 573)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 369


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________547 What drugs did (NAME) take? ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS ANTIMALARIAL DRUGSSP/FANSIDAR . . . A SP/FANSIDAR . . . A SP/FANSIDAR . . . ACHLOROQUINE . B CHLOROQUINE . B CHLOROQUINE . BAMODIAQUINE . C AMODIAQUINE . C AMODIAQUINE . CQUININE . . . . . . . D QUININE . . . . . . . D QUININE . . . . . . . DAny other drugs? AL/COARTEM . . . E AL/COARTEM . . . E AL/COARTEM . . . EOTHER ANTI- OTHER ANTI- OTHER ANTI-RECORD ALL MENTIONED. MALARIAL MALARIAL MALARIALF F F(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS ANTIBIOTIC DRUGS ANTIBIOTIC DRUGSPILL/SYRUP . . . G PILL/SYRUP . . . G PILL/SYRUP . . . GINJECTION . . . H INJECTION . . . H INJECTION . . . HOTHER DRUGS OTHER DRUGS OTHER DRUGSASPIRIN . . . . . . . I ASPIRIN . . . . . . . I ASPIRIN . . . . . . . IACETA- ACETA- ACETA-MINOPHEN . . . J MINOPHEN . . . J MINOPHEN . . . JIBUPROFEN . . . K IBUPROFEN . . . K IBUPROFEN . . . KOTHER X OTHER X OTHER X(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . Z DON'T KNOW . . . . . Z DON'T KNOW . . . . . Z548 CHECK 547: YES NO YES NO YES NOANY CODE A-G CIRCLED?(GO BACK TO (GO BACK TO (GO TO 503503 IN NEXT 503 IN NEXT IN NEXT-TO-LASTCOLUMN; OR, COLUMN; OR, COLUMN OF NEWIF NO MORE IF NO MORE QUESTIONNAIRE; OR,BIRTHS, GO BIRTHS, GO IF NO MORE BIRTHS,TO 573) TO 573) GO TO 573)549 Did you already have (NAME OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS ANTIMALARIAL DRUGSDRUG FROM 547) at home wh<strong>en</strong> SP/FANSIDAR . . . A SP/FANSIDAR . . . A SP/FANSIDAR . . . Athe child became ill? CHLOROQUINE . B CHLOROQUINE . B CHLOROQUINE . BAMODIAQUINE. . . C AMODIAQUINE. . . C AMODIAQUINE. . . CASK SEPARATELY FOR EACH QUININE . . . . . . . D QUININE . . . . . . . D QUININE . . . . . . . DOF THE DRUGS 'A' THROUGH 'G' AL/COARTEM . . . E AL/COARTEM . . . E AL/COARTEM . . . ETHAT THE CHILD IS RECORDED OTHER ANTI- OTHER ANTI- OTHER ANTI-AS HAVING TAKEN IN 547. MALARIAL . . . F MALARIAL . . . F MALARIAL . . . FIF YES FOR ANY DRUG, CIRCLE ANTIBIOTIC PILL/ ANTIBIOTIC PILL/ ANTIBIOTIC PILL/CODE FOR THAT DRUG. SYRUP . . . . . . . G SYRUP . . . . . . . G SYRUP . . . . . . . GIF NO FOR ALL DRUGS,CIRCLE 'Y'. NO DRUG AT HOME . Y NO DRUG AT HOME . Y NO DRUG AT HOME . Y370 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________550 CHECK 547: YES NO YES NO YES NOANY CODE A-F CIRCLED?(GO BACK TO (GO BACK TO (GO TO 503 IN503 IN NEXT 503 IN NEXT NEXT-TO-LASTCOLUMN; OR, COLUMN; OR, COLUMN OF NEWIF NO MORE IF NO MORE QUESTIONNAIRE;BIRTHS, GO BIRTHS, GO OR, IF NO MORETO 573) TO 573) BIRTHS, GO TO 573)551 CHECK 547: CODE 'A' CODE 'A' CODE 'A' CODE 'A' CODE 'A' CODE 'A'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTSP/FANSIDAR ('A') GIVEN CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 554) (SKIP TO 554) (SKIP TO 554)552 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1SP/Fansidar? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8553 For how many days did (NAME)take the SP/Fansidar? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8554 CHECK 547: CODE 'B' CODE 'B' CODE 'B' CODE 'B' CODE 'B' CODE 'B'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTCHLOROQUINE ('B') GIVEN CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 557) (SKIP TO 557) (SKIP TO 557)555 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1chloroquine? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8556 For how many days did (NAME)take the chloroquine? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8557 CHECK 547: CODE 'C' CODE 'C' CODE 'C' CODE 'C' CODE 'C' CODE 'C'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTAMODIAQUINE ('C') GIVEN CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 560) (SKIP TO 560) (SKIP TO 560)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 371


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________558 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1Amodiaquine? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8559 For how many days did (NAME)take the Amodiaquine? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8560 CHECK 547: CODE 'D' CODE 'D' CODE 'D' CODE 'D' CODE 'D' CODE 'D'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTQUININE ('D') GIVEN CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(SKIP TO 563) (SKIP TO 563) (SKIP TO 563)561 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1quinine? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8562 For how many days did (NAME)take the quinine? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8563 CHECK 547: CODE 'E' CODE 'E' CODE 'E' CODE 'E' CODE 'E' CODE 'E'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTARTEMETER+LUMEFANTRINE CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLED(AL/COARTEM) ('E') GIVEN(SKIP TO 569) (SKIP TO 569) (SKIP TO 569)564 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1AL? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8565 For how many days did (NAME)take AL? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8372 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LAST BIRTH NEXT-TO-LAST BIRTH SECOND-FROM-LAST BIRTHNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS NAME ________________ NAME ________________ NAME _________________569 CHECK 547: CODE 'F' CODE 'F' CODE 'F' CODE 'F' CODE 'F' CODE 'F'CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOT CIRCLED NOTOTHER ANTIMALARIAL ('F') CIRCLED CIRCLED CIRCLEDGIVEN(GO TO 571A) (GO TO 571A) (GO TO 571A)570 How long after the fever SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0 SAME DAY . . . . . 0started did (NAME) first take NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1 NEXT DAY . . . . . 1(OTHER ANTIMALARIAL)? TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTER TWO DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2 FEVER . . . . . 2THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTER THREE DAYS AFTERFEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3 FEVER . . . . . 3FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYS FOUR OR MORE DAYSAFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4 AFTER FEVER . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8571 For how many days did (NAME)take the (OTHER ANTIMALARIAL)? DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . . DAYS . . . . . . . . .IF 7 DAYS OR MORE, WRITE 7. DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8571A Was anything <strong>el</strong>se done about YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(NAME)'s fever? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 572) (SKIP TO 572) (SKIP TO 572)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 8571B What was done about (NAME)'s CONSULTED CONSULTED CONSULTEDfever? TRAD'L HEALER . . . A TRAD'L HEALER . . . A TRAD'L HEALER . . . AGAVE WARM GAVE WARM GAVE WARMSPONGING . . . . . . . B SPONGING . . . . . . . B SPONGING . . . . . . . BGAVE HERBS . . . . . C GAVE HERBS . . . . . C GAVE HERBS . . . . . COTHER . . . . . . . . . X OTHER . . . . . . . . . X OTHER . . . . . . . . . X572 GO BACK TO 503 IN GO BACK TO 503 IN GO TO 503 IN NEXT-TONEXT COLUMN; OR, IF NEXT COLUMN; OR, IF LAST COLUMN OF NEWNO MORE BIRTHS, GO NO MORE BIRTHS, GO QUESTIONNAIRE; OR,TO 573. TO 573. IF NO MORE BIRTHS,GO TO 573.App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 373


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP573 CHECK 215 AND 218, ALL ROWS:NUMBER OF CHILDREN BORN IN 2003 OR LATER AND LIVING WITH THE RESPONDENTONE OR MORE NONE 576RECORD NAME OF YOUNGEST CHILD LIVINGWITH HER (AND CONTINUE WITH 574)(NAME)574 The last time (NAME FROM 573) passed stools, CHILD USED TOILET OR LATRINE . . . 01what was done to dispose of the stools?PUT/RINSEDINTO TOILET OR LATRINE . . . . . . . 02PUT/RINSEDINTO DRAIN OR DITCH . . . . . . . . 03THROWN INTO GARBAGE . . . . . . . . . 04BURIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05LEFT IN THE OPEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06OTHER 96(SPECIFY)575 CHECK 528(a) AND 528(b), ALL COLUMNS:NO CHILDANY CHILDRECEIVED FLUID RECEIVED FLUID 576BFROM ORS PACKETFROM ORS PACKET576 Have you ever heard of a special product called Oralite or ORS YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1that you can get for the treatm<strong>en</strong>t of diarrhoea? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2576A CHECK 224:ONE OR MORE NO 601BIRTHSBIRTHSIN 2003 IN 2003OR LATEROR LATER576BCHECK 218, ALL ROWS: ANY CHILD LIVING WITH RESPONDENT?YES, ONE OR MORE NO CHILDREN 601CHILDREN LIVING WITH HERLIVING WITH HER576C Wh<strong>en</strong> a child is ill, what signs of illness would t<strong>el</strong>l you that he NOT ABLE TO DRINK/BREASTFEED .. Aor she should be tak<strong>en</strong> to health facility or health worker? FEVER, SHIVERING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BREPEATED VOMITING . . . . . . . . . . . . CCIRCLE ALL MENTIONED. DIARRHOEA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DBLOOD IN STOOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EFAST BREATHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FCONVULSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GWEAKNESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HGETTING SICKER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IOTHER_________________________(SPECIFY)X577 CHECK 215 AND 218, ALL ROWS:NUMBER OF CHILDREN BORN IN 2005 OR LATER AND LIVING WITH THE RESPONDENTONE OR MORE NONE 601RECORD NAME OF YOUNGEST CHILD LIVINGWITH HER (AND CONTINUE WITH 578)(NAME)374 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP578 Now I would like to ask you about liquids or foods(NAME FROM 577) had yesterday during the day or at night.Did (NAME FROM 577) (drink/eat): YES NO DKPlain water? PLAIN WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Commercially produced infant formula? FORMULA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Milk, such as tinned, powdered, or fresh animal milk? MILK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Tea or coffee? TEA OR COFFEE . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Any other liquids? OTHER LIQUIDS . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Any fortified baby food like Cer<strong>el</strong>ac? BABY CEREAL . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8Any (other) porridge or gru<strong>el</strong>? OTHER PORRIDGE/GRUEL. . 1 2 8579 Now I would like to ask you about other foods (NAME FROM577) ate over the last 24 hours. I am interested in whether(NAME) had the item ev<strong>en</strong> if it was combined with other foods.Yesterday, did (NAME) eat:YES NO DKa) Any foods made from grains, like maize, rice, wheat,porridge, sorghum or other local grains? GRAINS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8b) Pumpkin, y<strong>el</strong>low yams, butternut, carrots or y<strong>el</strong>lowsweet potatoes? RED-YELLOW VEGETABLES 1 2 8c) Any other food made from roots or tubers, like whitepotatoes, arrowroot, cassava, or other roots or tubers? ROOTS, TUBERS. . . . . . . . . 1 2 8d) Any gre<strong>en</strong> leafy vegetables? GREEN LEAFY VEGETABLES 1 2 8e) Mango, pawpaw, guava? MANGO, PAWPAW, GUAVA 1 2 8f) Any other fruits and vegetables like bananas, apples, gre<strong>en</strong>beans, avocados, tomatoes, oranges, pineapples, passion OTHER FRUITS . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8fruit?g) Meat, chick<strong>en</strong>, fish, liver, kidney, blood, termites, sea foodor eggs? MEAT, CHICKEN, FISH, EGGS 1 2 8h) Any food made from legumes, e.g. l<strong>en</strong>tils, beans, soybeans,pulses or pea nuts? BEANS, PULSES . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8i) Sour milk, cheese, or yoghurt? SOUR MILK, CHEESE . . . . . 1 2 8j) Any other solid or semi-solid food? ANY OTHER SOLID ORMUSHY FOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8580 CHECK 578 (LAST 2 CATEGORIES: BABY CEREAL OR OTHER PORRIDGE/GRUEL) AND 579:AT LEAST ONE NOT A SINGLE "YES" 601"YES'581 How many times did (NAME FROM 577) eat solid, semisolid, or NUMBER OFsoft foods yesterday during the day or at night? TIMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF 7 OR MORE TIMES, RECORD ‘7'. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 375


SECTION 6. MARRIAGE AND SEXUAL ACTIVITYNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP601 Are you curr<strong>en</strong>tly married or living together with a man as if YES, CURRENTLY MARRIED . . . . . . . 1married? YES, LIVING WITH A MAN . . . . . . . . . 2 604NO, NOT IN UNION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3602 Have you ever be<strong>en</strong> married or lived together with a man as if YES, FORMERLY MARRIED . . . . . . . 1married? YES, LIVED WITH A MAN . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 617603 What is your marital status now: are you widowed, WIDOWED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1divorced, or separated? DIVORCED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 609SEPARATED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3604 Is your husband/partner living with you now or is he staying LIVING WITH HER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>el</strong>sewhere? STAYING ELSEWHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . 2605 RECORD THE HUSBAND'S/PARTNER'S NAME AND LINE NAME _____________________________NUMBER FROM THE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE.IF HE IS NOT LISTED IN THE HOUSEHOLD, RECORD '00'.LINE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .606 Does your husband/partner have other wives or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1does he live with other wom<strong>en</strong> as if married? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 609607 Including yours<strong>el</strong>f, in total, how many wives or partners does TOTAL NUMBER OF WIVESyour husband live with now as if married? AND LIVE-IN PARTNERS . . . . .DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98608 Are you the first, second, … wife?RANK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .609 Have you be<strong>en</strong> married or lived with a man only once or ONLY ONCE .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1more than once? MORE THAN ONCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2615 CHECK 609:MARRIED/MARRIED/LIVED WITH A MAN LIVED WITH A MAN MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ONLY ONCEMORE THAN ONCEIn what month and year Now I would like to ask about DON'T KNOW MONTH . . . . . . . . . 98did you start living withwh<strong>en</strong> you started living withyour husband/partner?your first husband/partner.In what month and year YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . 616Awas that?DON'T KNOW YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998616 How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> you first started living with him?AGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .616A Wh<strong>en</strong> you got married or lived with a man, was it your choice OWN CHOICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or it was arranged? ARRANGED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2616B Wh<strong>en</strong> you first got married or lived with a man, was the man OLDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1older than you, younger than you or the same age as you? YOUNGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ABOUT THE SAME AGE . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 617DON'T KNOW/DON'T REMEMBER . . . 8616C Would you say this person was t<strong>en</strong> or more years older than TEN OR MORE YEARS OLDER . . . . . 1you or less than t<strong>en</strong> years older than you? LESS THAN TEN YEARS OLDER . . . 2OLDER, UNSURE HOW MUCH . . . . . 3617 CHECK FOR THE PRESENCE OF OTHER PEOPLE BEFORE CONTINUING, MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ENSUREPRIVACY.376 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP618 Now I need to ask you some questions about sexual activity in NEVER HAD SEXUALorder to gain a better understanding of some important life INTERCOURSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00issues.How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> you had sexual intercourse for the very AGE IN YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . 621first time?FIRST TIME WHEN STARTEDLIVING WITH (FIRST)HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 621619 CHECK 107: AGE AGE15-24 25-49 641620 Do you int<strong>en</strong>d to wait until you get married to have sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse for the first time? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 641DON'T KNOW/UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.621 CHECK 107: AGE AGE15-24 25-49 626622 The first time you had sexual intercourse, was a condom YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1used? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/DON'T REMEMBER . . . 8623 How old was the person you first had sexual intercoursewith? AGE OF PARTNER . . . . . . . . . 626DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98624 Was this person older than you, younger than you, or about OLDER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1the same age as you? YOUNGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ABOUT THE SAME AGE . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 626DON'T KNOW/DON'T REMEMBER . . . 8625 Would you say this person was t<strong>en</strong> or more years older than TEN OR MORE YEARS OLDER . . . . . 1you or less than t<strong>en</strong> years older than you? LESS THAN TEN YEARS OLDER . . . 2OLDER, UNSURE HOW MUCH . . . . . 3626 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you had sexual intercourse?DAYS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IF LESS THAN 12 MONTHS, ANSWER MUST BE RECORDEDIN DAYS, WEEKS OR MONTHS. WEEKS AGO . . . . . . . . . 2IF 12 MONTHS (ONE YEAR) OR MORE, ANSWER MUST BERECORDED IN YEARS. MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . 3YEARS AGO . . . . . . . . . 4 640App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 377


LASTSEXUAL PARTNERSECOND-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNERTHIRD-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNER626ANow I would like to ask you some questions about your rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity. Let me assure you again that your answersare complet<strong>el</strong>y confid<strong>en</strong>tial and will not be told to anyone. If we should come to any question that you don't wantto answer, just let me know and we will go to the next question. SKIP TO 628627 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you hadsexual intercourse with this DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1person?WEEKS 2 WEEKS 2MONTHS 3 MONTHS 3628 The last time you had sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse (with this second/third NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2person), was a condom used? (SKIP TO 630) (SKIP TO 630) (SKIP TO 630)629A What is the main reason you PREVENT STD/HIV . . . . 1 PREVENT STD/HIV . . . . 1 PREVENT STD/HIV . . . . 1used a condom on that AVOID PREGNANCY . . . . 2 AVOID PREGNANCY . . . . 2 AVOID PREGNANCY . . . . 2occasion? BOTH PREVENT STD/HIV BOTH PREVENT STD/HIV BOTH PREVENT STD/HIVAND PREGNANCY . . . . 3 AND PREGNANCY . . . . 3 AND PREGNANCY . . . . 3DID NOT TRUST PARTNER/ DID NOT TRUST PARTNER/ DID NOT TRUST PARTNER/HE MAY HAVE OTHER HE MAY HAVE OTHER HE MAY HAVE OTHERPARTNERS . . . . . . . . . 4 PARTNERS . . . . . . . . . 4 PARTNERS . . . . . . . . . 4PARTNER WANTED TO USE 5 PARTNER WANTED TO USE 5 PARTNER WANTED TO USE 5OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)629 Did you use a condom every YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1time you had sexual intercourse NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2with this person in the last12 months?630 What was your r<strong>el</strong>ationship to HUSBAND . . . . . . . . . . . 1 HUSBAND . . . . . . . . . . . 1 HUSBAND . . . . . . . . . . . 1this person with whom you had (SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636)sexual intercourse? LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2 LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2 LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2BOYFRIEND NOT BOYFRIEND NOT BOYFRIEND NOTIF BOYFRIEND: LIVING WITH LIVING WITH LIVING WITHWere you living together as if RESPONDENT . . . . 3 RESPONDENT . . . . 3 RESPONDENT . . . . 3married? CASUAL CASUAL CASUALIF YES, CIRCLE '2'. ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4 ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4 ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4IF NO, CIRCLE '3'. PAYING CLIENT 5 PAYING CLIENT 5 PAYING CLIENT 5OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)631 For how long (have you had/didyou have) a sexual r<strong>el</strong>ationship DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1with this person?IF ONLY HAD SEXUAL MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2RELATIONS WITH THIS PERSONONCE, RECORD '01' DAYS. YEARS 3 YEARS 3 YEARS 3632 CHECK 107: AGE AGE AGE AGE AGE AGE15-24 25-49 15-24 25-49 15-24 25-49(SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636)633 How old is this person? AGE OF AGE OF AGE OFPARTNER PARTNER PARTNER(SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636)DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98 DON'T KNOW . . . . . 98634 Is this person older than you, OLDER . . . . . . . 1 OLDER . . . . . . . 1 OLDER . . . . . . . 1younger than you, or about the YOUNGER . . . . . 2 YOUNGER . . . . . 2 YOUNGER . . . . . 2same age? SAME AGE . . . . . 3 SAME AGE . . . . . 3 SAME AGE . . . . . 3DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8 DON'T KNOW . . . 8(SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636) (SKIP TO 636)378 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LASTSEXUAL PARTNERSECOND-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNERTHIRD-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNER635 Would you say this person is t<strong>en</strong> TEN OR MORE TEN OR MORE TEN OR MOREor more years older than you or YEARS OLDER . 1 YEARS OLDER . 1 YEARS OLDER . 1less than t<strong>en</strong> years older than you? LESS THAN TEN LESS THAN TEN LESS THAN TENYEARS OLDER . 2 YEARS OLDER . 2 YEARS OLDER . 2OLDER, UNSURE OLDER, UNSURE OLDER, UNSUREHOW MUCH . . . 3 HOW MUCH . . . 3 HOW MUCH . . . 3636 The last time you had sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse with this person, NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2did you or this person drink (SKIP TO 638) (SKIP TO 638) (SKIP TO 639)alcohol?637 Were you or your partner drunk RESPONDENT ONLY 1 RESPONDENT ONLY 1 RESPONDENT ONLY 1at that time? PARTNER ONLY . . . 2 PARTNER ONLY . . . 2 PARTNER ONLY . . . 2BOTH RESPONDENT BOTH RESPONDENT BOTH RESPONDENTIF YES: Who was drunk? AND PARTNER . 3 AND PARTNER . 3 AND PARTNER . 3NEITHER . . . . . . . . . 4 NEITHER . . . . . . . . . 4 NEITHER . . . . . . . . . 4638 Apart from [this person/these two YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1people], have you had sexual (GO BACK TO 627 (GO BACK TO 627intercourse with any other IN NEXT COLUMN) IN NEXT COLUMN)person in the last 12 months? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 640) (SKIP TO 640)639 In total, with how many differ<strong>en</strong>t NUMBER OFpeople have you had sexualPARTNERSintercourse in the last 12 months? LAST 12MONTHS . . .IF NON-NUMERIC ANSWER,PROBE TO GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . .98IF NUMBER OF PARTNERS ISGREATER THAN 95, WRITE '95.''App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 379


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP640 In total, with how many differ<strong>en</strong>t people have you had sexual NUMBER OF PARTNERSintercourse in your lifetime? IN LIFETIME . . . . . . . . . . .IF NON-NUMERIC ANSWER, PROBE TO GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98IF NUMBER OF PARTNERS IS GREATER THAN 95, WRITE '95'.640A In the last 12 months, have you ever giv<strong>en</strong> or received money, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1gifts or favours in return for sex? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2641 Do you know of a place where a person can get male YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1condoms? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 644642 Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVT. HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . CGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . DPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE ANDCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). OTHER PUBLIC E(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTOROR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITEFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . FTHE NAME OF THE PLACE.FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . HPHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . . I(NAME OF PLACE(S)) NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . JOTHER PRIV. MEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LCOMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR MSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NFRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)643 If you wanted to, could you yours<strong>el</strong>f get a male condom? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . 8644 Do you know of a place where a person can get female YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1condoms? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 647380 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP645 Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVT. HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . CGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . DPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE ANDCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). OTHER PUBLIC E(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTOROR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITEFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . FTHE NAME OF THE PLACE.FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . HPHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . . I(NAME OF PLACE(S)) NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . JOTHER PRIV. MEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LCOMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR MSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NFRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)646 If you wanted to, could you yours<strong>el</strong>f get a female condom? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . 8647 In the last few months have you heard or read about condoms: YES NOOn the radio? RADIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2On the t<strong>el</strong>evision? TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2In a newspaper or magazine? NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINE . . 1 2On billboards? BILLBOARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2NOT DK/648 In your opinion,is it acceptable or unacceptable for condoms to ACCEP- ACCEP- UNbeadvertised: TABLE TABLE SUREOn the radio? ON THE RADIO. . 1 2 8On the TV? ON THE TV. . . . . 1 2 8In newspapers? NEWSPAPERS. . 1 2 8On billboards BILLBOARDS. . . 1 2 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 381


SECTION 7. FERTILITY PREFERENCESNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP701 CHECK 311/311A:NEITHERHE OR SHESTERILIZED STERILIZED 713702 CHECK 226:NOT PREGNANTOR UNSUREPREGNANTNow I have some questions Now I have some questions HAVE (A/ANOTHER) CHILD . . . . . . . 1about the future. about the future. NO MORE/NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 704Would you like to have After the child you are SAYS SHE CAN'T GET PREGNANT . 3 713(a/another) child, or would you expecting now, would you like UNDECIDED/DON'T KNOW ANDprefer not to have any (more) to have another child, or would PREGNANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 709childr<strong>en</strong>? you prefer not to have any UNDECIDED/DON'T KNOWmore childr<strong>en</strong>?AND NOT PREGNANT ORUNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 708703 CHECK 226:MONTHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NOT PREGNANTPREGNANTOR UNSURE YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2How long would you like to wait After the birth of the child you SOON/NOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993 708from now before the birth of are expecting now, how long SAYS SHE CAN'T GET PREGNANT 994 713(a/another) child? would you like to wait before AFTER MARRIAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995the birth of another child?OTHER _______________________ 996 708(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998704 CHECK 226:NOT PREGNANTPREGNANTOR UNSURE 709705 CHECK 310: USING A CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD?706 CHECK 703:NOT NOT CURRENTLYASKED CURRENTLY USING 713USINGNOT 24 OR MORE MONTHS 00-23 MONTHSASKED OR 02 OR MORE YEARS OR 00-01 YEAR 709382 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP707 CHECK 702: NOT MARRIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AWANTS TO HAVE WANTS NO MORE/ FERTILITY-RELATED REASONSA/ANOTHER CHILD NONE NOT HAVING SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BINFREQUENT SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CMENOPAUSAL/HYSTERECTOMY . DYou have said that you do not You have said that you do not SUBFECUND/INFECUND . . . . . . . Ewant (a/another) child soon, but want any (more) childr<strong>en</strong>, but POSTPARTUM AMENORRHEIC . . . Fyou are not using any method to you are not using any method to BREASTFEEDING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gavoid pregnancy. avoid pregnancy. FATALISTIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HCan you t<strong>el</strong>l me why you are Can you t<strong>el</strong>l me why you are OPPOSITION TO USEnot using a method? not using a method? RESPONDENT OPPOSED . . . . . . . IHUSBAND/PARTNER OPPOSED . JAny other reason? Any other reason? OTHERS OPPOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . KRELIGIOUS PROHIBITION . . . . . . . LRECORD ALL REASONS MENTIONED.LACK OF KNOWLEDGEKNOWS NO METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . MKNOWS NO SOURCE . . . . . . . . . . . . NMETHOD-RELATED REASONSHEALTH CONCERNS . . . . . . . . . . . . OFEAR OF SIDE EFFECTS . . . . . . . PLACK OF ACCESS/TOO FAR . . . . . QCOSTS TOO MUCH . . . . . . . . . . . . RINCONVENIENT TO USE . . . . . . . SINTERFERES WITH BODY'SNORMAL PROCESSES . . . . . . . TOTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z707A In the next few weeks, if you dicovered that you were pregnant, BIG PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1would that be a big problem, a small problem, or no problem for SMALL PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2you? NO PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3SAYS SHE CAN'T GET PREGNANT/NOT HAVING SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4708 CHECK 310: USING A CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD?NOT NO, YES,ASKED NOT CURRENTLY USING CURRENTLY USING 713709 Do you think you will use a contraceptive method to d<strong>el</strong>ay or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1avoid pregnancy at any time in the future? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 711DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 713710 Which contraceptive method would you prefer to use? FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . 01MALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 02PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07 713FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08LACTATIONAL AMEN. METHOD . . . . . 09RHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10WITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11OTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 383


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP711 What is the main reason that you think you will not use a NOT MARRIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11contraceptive method at any time in the future?FERTILITY-RELATED REASONSINFREQUENT SEX/NO SEX . . . . . 22MENOPAUSAL/HYSTERECTOMY 23SUBFECUND/INFECUND . . . . . . . 24WANTS AS MANY CHILDREN ASPOSSIBLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26OPPOSITION TO USERESPONDENT OPPOSED . . . . . . . 31HUSBAND/PARTNER OPPOSED 32OTHERS OPPOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . 33RELIGIOUS PROHIBITION . . . . . . . 34LACK OF KNOWLEDGEKNOWS NO METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 713KNOWS NO SOURCE . . . . . . . . . . . . 42METHOD-RELATED REASONSHEALTH CONCERNS . . . . . . . . . . . . 51FEAR OF SIDE EFFECTS . . . . . . . 52LACK OF ACCESS/TOO FAR . . . . . 53COSTS TOO MUCH . . . . . . . . . . . . 54INCONVENIENT TO USE . . . . . . . . . 55INTERFERES WITH BODY'SNORMAL PROCESSES . . . . . . . 56OTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98712 Would you ever use a contraceptive method if you were married? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8713 CHECK 216:HAS LIVING CHILDRENNO LIVING CHILDRENNONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 715If you could go back to the time If you could choose exactly theyou did not have any childr<strong>en</strong> number of childr<strong>en</strong> to have in NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .and could choose exactly the your whole life, how manynumber of childr<strong>en</strong> to have in would that be?your whole life, how many OTHER _______________________ 96 715would that be?(SPECIFY)PROBE FOR A NUMERIC RESPONSE.714 How many of these childr<strong>en</strong> would you like to be boys, how many BOYS GIRLS EITHERwould you like to be girls and for how many would the sex notmatter?NUMBEROTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)715 In the last few months have you: YES NOHeard about family planning on the radio? RADIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Se<strong>en</strong> about family planning on the t<strong>el</strong>evision? TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Read about family planning in a newspaper or magazine? NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINE . . . 1 2384 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP717 CHECK 601:YES, YES, NO,CURRENTLY LIVING NOT IN 801MARRIED WITH A MAN UNION718 CHECK 311/311A: CODE B, G, OR MCIRCLED720NO CODECIRCLED 722OTHER719 Does your husband/partner know that you are using YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a method of family planning? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8720 Would you say that using contraception is mainly your MAINLY RESPONDENT . . . . . . . . . 1decision, mainly your husband's/partner's decision, or did MAINLY HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . 2you both decide together? JOINT DECISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER 6(SPECIFY)720A Now I want to ask you about your husband's/partner's views on APPROVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1family planning. Do you think that your husband/partner approves DISAPPROVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or disapproves of couples using a method to avoid pregnancy? DOES NOT KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8720B How oft<strong>en</strong> have you talked to your husband/partner about NEVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1family planning in the past year? ONCE OR TWICE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2MORE OFTEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3721 CHECK 311/311A:NEITHERHE OR SHESTERILIZED STERILIZED 801722 Does your husband/partner want the same number of SAME NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1childr<strong>en</strong> that you want, or does he want more or fewer than you MORE CHILDREN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2want? FEWER CHILDREN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 385


SECTION 8. HUSBAND'S BACKGROUND AND WOMAN'S WORKNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP801 CHECK 601 AND 602:CURRENTLY FORMERLY 803MARRIED/ MARRIED/ NEVER MARRIEDLIVING WITH LIVED WITH AND NEVER 807A MAN A MAN LIVED WITH A MAN802 How old was your husband/partner on his last birthday?AGE IN COMPLETED YEARS803 Did your (last) husband/partner ever att<strong>en</strong>d school? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 806804 What is the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of school he att<strong>en</strong>ded: PRIMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1primary, vocational, secondary, or higher? POST-PRIMARY/VOCATIONAL . . . . . 2SECONDARY/'A' LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . 3COLLEGE (MIDDLE LEVEL) . . . . . . . 4UNIVERSITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 806805 What is the highest (standard/form/year) he completed at thatlev<strong>el</strong>? STANDARD/FORM/YEAR . . .IF NONE, WRITE '00'. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98806 CHECK 801:CURRENTLY MARRIED/LIVING WITH A MANWhat is your husband's/partner'soccupation?That is, what kind of work doeshe mainly do?FORMERLY MARRIED/LIVED WITH A MANWhat was your (last) husband's/partner's occupation?That is, what kind of work did hemainly do?807 Aside from your own housework, have you done any work YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 811in the last sev<strong>en</strong> days? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2808 As you know, some wom<strong>en</strong> take up jobs for which they are paidin cash or kind. Others s<strong>el</strong>l things, have a small business orwork on the family farm or in the family business. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 811In the last sev<strong>en</strong> days, have you done any of these things NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or any other work?809 Although you did not work in the last sev<strong>en</strong> days, do you haveany job or business from which you were abs<strong>en</strong>t for leave, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 811illness, vacation, maternity leave or any other such reason? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2810 Have you done any work in the last 12 months? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 818811 What is your occupation, that is, what kind of work do you mainlydo?812 CHECK 811:WORKS INDOES NOT WORKAGRICULTURE IN AGRICULTURE 814386 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP813 Do you work mainly on your own land or on family land, or do you OWN LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1work on land that you r<strong>en</strong>t from someone <strong>el</strong>se, or do you work on FAMILY LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2someone <strong>el</strong>se's land? RENTED LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3SOMEONE ELSE'S LAND . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)814 Do you do this work for a member of your family, for someone FOR FAMILY MEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>el</strong>se, or are you s<strong>el</strong>f-employed? FOR SOMEONE ELSE . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SELF-EMPLOYED . . . . . . . . . . . . 3815 Do you usually work at home or away from home? HOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AWAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2816 Do you usually work throughout the year, or do you work THROUGHOUT THE YEAR . . . . . . . . . 1seasonally, or only once in a while? SEASONALLY/PART OF THE YEAR . 2ONCE IN A WHILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3817 Are you paid in cash or kind for this work or are you not paid at all? CASH ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1CASH AND KIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2IN KIND ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3NOT PAID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4818 CHECK 601:CURRENTLYMARRIED/LIVINGNOT IN UNIONWITH A MAN 827819 CHECK 817:CODE 1 OR 2CIRCLED OTHER 822820 Who usually decides how the money you earn will be used: RESPONDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1mainly you, mainly your husband/partner, or HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2you and your husband/partner jointly?RESPONDENT ANDHUSBAND/PARTNER JOINTLY . . . 3OTHER 6(SPECIFY)821 Would you say that the money that you earn is more than what MORE THAN HIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1your husband/partner earns, less than what he earns, LESS THAN HIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or about the same? ABOUT THE SAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3HUSBAND/PARTNER DOESN'TBRING IN ANY MONEY . . . . . . . . . 4 823DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8822 Who usually decides how your husband's/partner's earnings RESPONDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1will be used: you, your husband/partner, or you and your HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2husband/partner jointly?RESPONDENT ANDHUSBAND/PARTNER JOINTLY . . . 3HUSBAND/PARTNER HASNO EARNINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)823 Who usually makes decisions about health care for yours<strong>el</strong>f:you, your husband/partner, you and your husband/partnerjointly, or someone <strong>el</strong>se?RESPONDENT = 1HUSBAND/PARTNER = 2RESPONDENT & HUSBAND/PARTNER JOINTLY = 3SOMEONE ELSE = 4OTHER = 61 2 3 4 6824 Who usually makes decisions about making majorhousehold purchases? 1 2 3 4 6App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 387


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP825 Who usually makes decisions about making purchasesfor daily household needs? 1 2 3 4 6826 Who usually makes decisions about visits to your familyor r<strong>el</strong>atives? 1 2 3 4 6826AWho usually makes decisions about what food shouldbe cooked each day? 1 2 3 4 6827 PRESENCE OF OTHERS AT THIS POINT (PRESENT AND PRES./ PRES./ NOTLISTENING, PRESENT BUT NOT LISTENING, OR NOT LISTEN. NOT PRES.PRESENT)LISTEN.CHILDREN < 10 . . . . . 1 2 3HUSBAND . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3OTHER MALES . . . . . 1 2 3OTHER FEMALES . . . 1 2 3828 Sometimes a husband is annoyed or angered by things that hiswife does. In your opinion, is a husband justified in hitting orbeating his wife in the following situations: YES NO DKIf she goes out without t<strong>el</strong>ling him? GOES OUT . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8If she neglects the childr<strong>en</strong>? NEGL. CHILDREN . . . 1 2 8If she argues with him? ARGUES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8If she refuses to have sex with him? REFUSES SEX . . . . . 1 2 8If she burns the food? BURNS FOOD . . . . . . . 1 2 8388 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 9. HIV/AIDSNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP901 Now I would like to talk about something <strong>el</strong>se. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Have you ever heard of an illness called AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 917902 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1by having just one uninfected sex partner who has no other NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2sex partners? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8903 Can people get the AIDS virus from mosquito bites? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8904 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1using a condom every time they have sex? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8905 Can people get the AIDS virus by sharing food with a person YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1who has AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8906 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1not having sexual intercourse at all? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8907 Can people get the AIDS virus because of witchcraft or other YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1supernatural means? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8908A Is there anything <strong>el</strong>se a person can do to avoid getting YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AIDS or the virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 909DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 909908B What can a person do? ABSTAIN FROM SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AUSE CONDOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BLIMIT SEX TO ONE PARTNER/STAYFAITHFUL TO ONE PARTNER . . . . . . CAnything <strong>el</strong>se? LIMIT NUMBER OF SEX PARTNER . . . DAVOID SEX WITH PROSTITUTES . . . . . . EAVOID SEX WITH PERSONS WHOCIRCLE ALL MENTIONEDHAVE MANY PARTNERS . . . . . . . . . . FAVOID SEX WITH HOMOSEXUALS . . . GAVOID SEX WITH DRUG USERS . . . . . . HAVOID BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS . . . . . . IAVOID INJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JAVOID SHARING RAZORS/BLADES . . . KAVOID KISSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LAVOID MOSQUITO BITES . . . . . . . . . . MSEEK PROTECTION FROMTRADITIONAL HEALER . . . . . . . . . . NOTHERS (SPECIFY)OTHERS (SPECIFY)DON'T KNOWWXZ909 Is it possible for a healthy-looking person to have the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8910 Do you know someone personally who has the virus that YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1causes AIDS or someone who died of AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2911 Can the virus that causes AIDS be transmitted from a mother toher baby: YES NO DKDuring pregnancy? DURING PREG. . . . . . . 1 2 8During d<strong>el</strong>ivery? DURING DELIVERY . . . 1 2 8By breastfeeding? BREASTFEEDING . . . 1 2 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 389


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP912 CHECK 911:AT LEASTOTHERONE 'YES' 913912A Are there any special drugs that a doctor or a nurse can give YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1to a woman infected with the AIDS virus to reduce the risk of NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2transmission to the baby? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8913 CHECK 801:NEVER MARRIED/CURRENTLY MARRIED/ FORMERLY MARRIED/ NEVER LIVEDLIVING WITH A MAN LIVED WITH A MAN WITH A MAN 914A914 Have you ever talked with (your husband/the man you are YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1with) about ways to prev<strong>en</strong>t getting the virus that causes NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2AIDS?914A Would you buy fresh vegetables from a shopkeeper or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1v<strong>en</strong>dor if you knew that this person had the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8915 If a member of your family got infected with the AIDS virus, YES, REMAIN A SECRET . . . . . . . . . . 1would you want it to remain a secret or not? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . 8916 If a member of your family became sick with AIDS, would YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you be willing to care for her or him in your own household? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . 8916A In your opinion, if a female teacher has the AIDS virus, SHOULD BE ALLOWED . . . . . . . . . . . . 1but is not sick, should she be allowed to continue teaching SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED . . . . . . . . 2in the school? DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . 8916B Should childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 years be taught about using YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1condoms to avoid getting g AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . 8916B1 Do you think your chances of getting AIDS are small, NO RISK AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1moderate, great or no risk at all? SMALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2MODERATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 916B3GREAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4HAS AIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 916B4916B2 Why do you think that you have (no risk/small chance) of IS NOT HAVING SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agetting AIDS? Any reasons? USES CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BHAS ONLY ONE PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . CCIRCLE ALL MENTIONED LIMITS THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS .. DPATNER HAS NO OTHER PATNERS .. EOTHERX(SPECIFY)916B4916B3 Why do you think that you have (moderate/great) chance of DOES NOT USE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . Agetting AIDS? Any reasons?HAS MORE THAN ONE SEX PARTNER .. BPARTNER HAS OTHER PARTNERS . . . CCIRCLE ALL MENTIONEDHOMOSEXUAL CONTACTS . . . . . . . . . . DHAD BLOOD TRANSFUSION/INJECTION EOTHERX(SPECIFY)916B4 Have you ever heard of VCT? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2916B5 CHECK 208 AND 215: NO BIRTHS916CLAST BIRTH SINCELAST BIRTH BEFOREJANUARY 2005 JANUARY 2005 916C390 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP916B6916B7CHECK 407 FOR LAST BIRTH:HADNOANTENATALANTENATALCARE CARE 916CCHECK FOR PRESENCE OF OTHERS. BEFORE CONTINUING, MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE PRIVACY.916B8During any of the ant<strong>en</strong>atal visits for your last birth, didanyone talk to you about: YES NO DKBabies getting the AIDS virus from their mother? AIDS FROM MOTHER 1 2 8Things that you can do to prev<strong>en</strong>t getting the AIDS virus? THINGS TO DO . . . 1 2 8Getting tested for the AIDS virus? TESTED FOR AIDS .. 1 2 8916B9 Were you offered a test for the AIDS virus as part of your YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1ant<strong>en</strong>atal care? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2916B10 I don't want to know the results, but were you tested for the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AIDS virus as part of your ant<strong>en</strong>atal care? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 916C916B11 I don't want to know the results, but did you get the results of YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1the test? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2916B12 Where was the test done? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . 11GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 12IF SOURCE IS HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTRE OR CLINIC, GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . . 13WRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE. PROBE TO IDENTIFYTHE TYPE SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE. OTHER PUBLIC 16(SPECIFY)NAME OF PLACEPRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORMISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINIC 21FPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 22IF NURSING/MATERNITY HOME, ASK IF IT IS RUN BY A PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . . 23CHURCH OR MISSION. IF SO, CIRCLE CODE ''21". VCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . 25BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES 26OTHER PRIVATEMEDICAL 27(SPECIFY)OTHER 96(SPECIFY)916B13 Have you be<strong>en</strong> tested for the AIDS virus since that time you YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 916C1were tested during your pregnancy? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2916B14 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you were tested for the AIDS virus? LESS THAN 12 MONTHS AGO . . . . . . 112 - 23 MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 9172 OR MORE YEARS AGO . . . . . . . . . . 3916C I do not want to know the results, but have you ever be<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1tested to see if you have the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 916D916C1 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you were tested? LESS THAN 12 MONTHS AGO . . . . . . 112 - 23 MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 OR MORE YEARS AGO . . . . . . . . . . 3916C2 The last time you were tested, did you ask for the test, was ASKED FOR TEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1it offered to you and you accepted, or was ir required? OFFERED AND ACCEPTED . . . . . . . . . . 2REQUIRED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3916C3 I donot want to know the results, but did you get the results YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1of the test? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 391


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP916C4 Where was the test done? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . 11GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 12IF SOURCE IS HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTRE OR CLINIC, GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . . 13WRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE. PROBE TO IDENTIFYTHE TYPE SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE. OTHER PUBLIC 16(SPECIFY)NAME OF PLACEPRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORMISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINIC 21FPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 22IF NURSING/MATERNITY HOME, ASK IF IT IS RUN BY A PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . . 23CHURCH OR MISSION. IF SO, CIRCLE CODE ''21". VCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . 25BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES 26OTHER PRIVATEMEDICAL 27(SPECIFY)917OTHER 96(SPECIFY)916D Would you want to be tested for the AIDS virus? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8916E Do you know of a place where people can go to get tested YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 917916F Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . AAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . BGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . . CIF SOURCE IS HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTRE OR CLINIC, OTHER PUBLIC DWRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE. PROBE TO IDENTIFY(SPECIFY)THE TYPE SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATECODE(S).PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORMISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINIC ENAME OF PLACE FPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . FPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . . GVCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HIF NURSING/MATERNITY HOME, ASK IF IT IS RUN BY A NURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . ICHURCH OR MISSION. IF SO, CIRCLE CODE ''E". BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES JOTHER PRIVATEMEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER(SPECIFY)X917 CHECK 901:HEARD ABOUTAIDSNOT HEARDABOUT AIDSApart from AIDS, have Have you heard about infectionsyou heard about other that can be transmitted throughinfections that can be sexual contact? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1transmitted through NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 919Asexual contact?392 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP918 If a man has a sexually transmitted disease, what symptoms ABDOMINAL PAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amight he have?GENITAL DISCHARGE/DRIPPING . . . . . . BFOUL SMELL/DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . . CBURNING PAIN ON URINATION . . . . . . DAny others?REDNESS/INFLAMATION IN GENITALAREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESWELLING IN GENITAL AREA . . . . . . . . FGENITAL SORES/ULCERS . . . . . . . . . . GGENITAL WARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HGENITAL ITCHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IRECORD ALL MENTIONEDBLOOD IN URINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JLOSS OF WEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KIMPOTENCE/NO ERECTION. . . . . . . . . . LOTHERW(SPECIFY)OTHERX(SPECIFY)NO SYMPTOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YDOES NOT KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z919 If a woman has a sexually transmitted disease, what ABDOMINAL PAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asymptoms might she have? GENITAL DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BFOUL SMELL/DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . . CBURNING PAIN ON URINATION . . . . . . DAny others?REDNESS/INFLAMATION IN GENITALAREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESWELLING IN GENITAL AREA . . . . . . . . FGENITAL SORES/ULCERS . . . . . . . . . . GGENITAL WARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HGENITAL ITCHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IRECORD ALL MENTIONEDBLOOD IN URINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JLOSS OF WEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KHARD TO GET PREGNANT . . . . . . . . . . LOTHERW(SPECIFY)OTHERX(SPECIFY)NO SYMPTOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YDOES NOT KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z919A CHECK 618:HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSEHAS NOT HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE1001919A1CHECK917: HEARD ABOUT OTHER SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS?YES NO 919C919B Now I would like to ask you some questions about your YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1health in the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months. During the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2months have you had a sexually transmitted disease? DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8919C Sometimes wom<strong>en</strong> experi<strong>en</strong>ce an abnormal vaginal YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1discharge. During the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months, have you had a NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2bad sm<strong>el</strong>ling unusual discharge from your vagina? DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8919D Sometimes wom<strong>en</strong> have a g<strong>en</strong>ital sore or ulcer. During the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months have you had a g<strong>en</strong>ital sore or ulcer? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8919E CHECK 919B, 919C AND 919D HAS NOT HADHAS HAD AN INFECTIONAN INFECTION OR(ANY 'YES') DOES NOT KNOW 1001919F Last time you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 919B/919C/919D), did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you seek any kind of advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 919HApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 393


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP919G Where did you go? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . AAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . BGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . . CPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE ANDCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). OTHER PUBLIC D(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTERVCT CENTER, OR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORWRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE.MISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINIC EFPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . FPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . . . . G(NAME OF PLACE(S)) VCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HNURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . IBLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES JOTHER PRIVATEMEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCETRADITIONAL HEALER . . . . . . . . . . LSHOP/PHARMACY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MFRIENDS OR RELATIVES. . . . . . . . . . NOTHER(SPECIFY)X919H Wh<strong>en</strong> you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 919B/919C/919D), did YES, INFORMED ALL PARTNERS . . . 1you inform the person(s) with whom you were having sex? NO, INFORMED NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2INFORMED SOME NOT ALL . . . . . . . . . . 3DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER . . . . . . . . 4 1001919I Wh<strong>en</strong> you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 919B/919C/919D), did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you do anything to avoid infecting your sexual partners(s) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1001DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER . . . . . . . . 3 1001919J What did you do to avoid infecting your partner(s)? Did YES NOyou:Use medicine? USE MEDICINE . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Stop having sex? STOP SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Use a condom wh<strong>en</strong> having sex? USE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2394 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 10. OTHER HEALTH ISSUESNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1001 Have you ever heard of an illness called tuberculosis or TB? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 10091002 How does tuberculosis spread from one person to another? THROUGH THE AIR WHENCOUGHING OR SNEEZING . . . . . . . APROBE: Any other ways? THROUGH SHARING UTENSILS . . . . . BTHROUGH TOUCHING A PERSONRECORD ALL MENTIONED.WITH TB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CTHROUGH FOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DTHROUGH SEXUAL CONTACT . . . . . ETHROUGH MOSQUITO BITES . . . . . . . FOTHERX(SPECIFY)DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z1003 Can tuberculosis be cured? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81004 If a member of your family got tuberculosis, would you want it to YES, REMAIN A SECRET . . . . . . . . . 1remain a secret or not? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81009 Do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke cigarettes? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 10111010 In the last 24 hours, how many cigarettes did you smoke?CIGARETTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1011 Do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke or use any other type of tobacco? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 10141012 What (other) type of tobacco do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke or use? PIPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACHEWING TOBACCO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BRECORD ALL MENTIONED. SNUFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COTHER(SPECIFY)X1014 Are you covered by any health insurance? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 10161015 What type of health insurance? MUTUAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION/COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTHRECORD ALL MENTIONED. INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AHEALTH INSURANCE THROUGHEMPLOYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BSOCIAL SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COTHER PRIVATELY PURCHASEDCOMMERCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE. DOTHERX(SPECIFY)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 395


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1016Sometimes a woman can have a problem such that sheexperi<strong>en</strong>ces a constant leakage of urine or stool from her vaginaduring the day and night. This problem usually occurs after adifficult childbirth, but may also occur after a sexual assault orafter a p<strong>el</strong>vic surgery.Have you ever experi<strong>en</strong>ced a constant leakage of urine or stoolfrom your vagina during the day and night?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 11011017 Did this problem occur after a d<strong>el</strong>ivery? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1021NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21018 Did this problem occur after a sexual assault? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1023NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21019 Did this problem occur after you had p<strong>el</strong>vic surgery? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1023NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21020 Did this problem occur after some other ev<strong>en</strong>t happ<strong>en</strong>ed YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1023to you? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1024IF YES: What happ<strong>en</strong>ed?EVENT(SPECIFY)1021 Did this problem occur after an uncomplicated d<strong>el</strong>ivery, after a UNCOMP. DELIVERY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1difficult d<strong>el</strong>ivery where the child was born alive, or after a difficult DIFF DELIVERY, LIVEBORN . . . . . . . 2d<strong>el</strong>ivery where the child was born still?DIFF DELIVERY, STILLBORN . . . . . . . 31022 After which d<strong>el</strong>ivery did this occur? DELIVERY NUMBER:1023 How many days after NUMBER OF DAYS AFTERdid the leakage start? PRECIPITATING EVENT . . . . .IF MORE THAN 99 DAYS, WRITE '99'.1024 Have you sought treatm<strong>en</strong>t for this condition? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2396 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 11. MATERNAL MORTALITYNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1101 Now I would like to ask you some questions about your NUMBER OF BIRTHS TObrothers and sisters, that is, all of the childr<strong>en</strong> born to your NATURAL MOTHER . . . . . . . . .biological mother, including those who are living with you,those living <strong>el</strong>sewhere and those who have died.How many childr<strong>en</strong> did your mother give birth to, including you?1102 CHECK 1101:TWO OR MORE BIRTHSONLY ONE BIRTH(RESPONDENT ONLY) 12001103 How many of these births did your mother have before NUMBER OFyou were born? PRECEDING BIRTHS . . . . . . . . .1104 What was the (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)name giv<strong>en</strong> toyour oldest(next oldest)brother or sister?1105 Is (NAME) MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1male or female? FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 21106 Is (NAME) still YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1alive? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8GO TO (2) GO TO (3) GO TO (4) GO TO (5) GO TO (6) GO TO (7)1107 How old is(NAME)?1108 How many yearsago did (NAME)die?GO TO (2) GO TO (3) GO TO (4) GO TO (5) GO TO (6) GO TO (7)1109 How old was(NAME) wh<strong>en</strong>he/she died?IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE ORDIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARSOF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGEGO TO (2) GO TO (3) GO TO (4) GO TO (5) GO TO (6) GO TO (7)1110 Was (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1pregnant wh<strong>en</strong> GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113she died? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 21111 Did (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1die during GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113childbirth? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 21112 Did (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1die within two NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2months afterthe <strong>en</strong>d of apregnancy orchildbirth?1113 How many liveborn childr<strong>en</strong> did(NAME) givebirth to duringher lifetime(before thispregnancy)?IF NO MORE BROTHERS OR SISTERS, GO TO 1200App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 397


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1104 What was the (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)name giv<strong>en</strong> toyour oldest (nextoldest) brotheror sister?1105 Is (NAME) male MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1 MALE 1or female? FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 2 FEMALE 21106 Is (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1still alive? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108 GO TO 1108DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8 DK . . . 8GO TO (8) GO TO (9) GO TO (10) GO TO (11) GO TO (12) GO TO (13)1107 How old is(NAME)?GO TO (8) GO TO (9) GO TO (10) GO TO (11) GO TO (12) GO TO (13)1108 How many yearsago did (NAME)die?1109 How old was(NAME) wh<strong>en</strong>he/she died?IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE OR IF MALE ORDIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE DIED BEFORE12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARS 12 YEARSOF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGE OF AGEGO TO (8) GO TO (9) GO TO (10) GO TO (11) GO TO (12) GO TO (13)1110 Was (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1pregnant wh<strong>en</strong> GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113she died? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 21111 Did (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1die during GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113 GO TO 1113childbirth? NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 21112 Did (NAME) YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1 YES . . . 1die within two NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2 NO . . . 2months afterthe <strong>en</strong>d of apregnancy orchildbirth?1113 How many liveborn childr<strong>en</strong>did (NAME) givebirth to duringher lifetime(before thispregnancy)?IF NO MORE BROTHERS OR SISTERS, GO TO 1200.398 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1200 CHECK HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE, COLUMN 9.SECTION 12. DOMESTIC VIOLENCEWOMAN SELECTED FOR WOMAN NOT SELECTED 1301THIS SECTION1201 CHECK FOR PRESENCE OF OTHERS:DO NOT CONTINUE UNTIL EFFECTIVE PRIVACY IS ENSURED.PRIVACYPRIVACYOBTAINED . . . . . . . 1 NOT POSSIBLE . . . . . . . 2 1234READ TO THE RESPONDENTNow I would like to ask you questions about some other important aspects of a woman's life. I know thatsome of these questions are very personal. However, your answers are crucial for h<strong>el</strong>ping to understandthe condition of wom<strong>en</strong> in K<strong>en</strong>ya. Let me assure you that your answers are complet<strong>el</strong>y confid<strong>en</strong>tialand will not be told to anyone and no one <strong>el</strong>se will know that you were asked these questions.1202 CHECK 601 AND 602:FORMERLYCURRENTLYMARRIED/MARRIED/ LIVED WITH A MAN NEVER MARRIED/LIVINGNEVER LIVEDWITH A MAN (READ IN PAST TENSE) WITH A MAN 12141203 First, I am going to ask you about some situations whichhapp<strong>en</strong> to some wom<strong>en</strong>. Please t<strong>el</strong>l me if these applyto your r<strong>el</strong>ationship with your (last) husband/partner?YES NO DKa) He (is/was) jealous or angry if you (talk/talked) to other m<strong>en</strong>? JEALOUS . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8b) He frequ<strong>en</strong>tly (accuses/accused) you of being unfaithful? ACCUSES . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8c) He (does/did) d) not permit you to meet your female e fri<strong>en</strong>ds? NOT MEET FRIENDS 1 2 8d) He (tries/tried) to limit your contact with your family? NO FAMILY . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8e) He (insists/insisted) on knowing where you (are/were) WHERE YOU ARE . . . 1 2 8at all times?f) He (does/did) not trust you with any money? MONEY . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 81204 Now if you will permit me, I need to ask some more questionsabout your r<strong>el</strong>ationship with your (last) husband/partner.If we should come to any question that you do not want toanswer, just let me know and we will go on to the next question.A (Does/did) your (last) husband/partner ever: B How oft<strong>en</strong> did this happ<strong>en</strong> duringthe last 12 months: oft<strong>en</strong>, onlysometimes, or not at all?SOME- NOTOFTEN TIMES AT ALLa) say or do something to humiliate you YES 1 1 2 3in front of others? NO 2b) threat<strong>en</strong> to hurt or harm you YES 1 1 2 3or someone close to you? NO 2c) insult you or make you fe<strong>el</strong> bad YES 1 1 2 3about yours<strong>el</strong>f? NO 2App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 399


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1205 A(Does/did) your (last) husband/partner ever doany of the following things to you:BHow oft<strong>en</strong> did this happ<strong>en</strong> duringthe last 12 months: oft<strong>en</strong>, onlysometimes, or not at all?SOME- NOTOFTEN TIMES AT ALLa) push you, shake you, or throw something YES 1 1 2 3at you? NO 2b) slap you? YES 1 1 2 3NO 2c) twist your arm or pull your hair? YES 1 1 2 3NO 2d) punch you with his fist or with something YES 1 1 2 3that could hurt you? NO 2e) kick you, drag you or beat you up? YES 1 1 2 3NO 2f) try to choke you or burn you on YES 1 1 2 3purpose? NO 2g) threat<strong>en</strong> or attack you with a knife, gun, or YES 1 1 2 3any other weapon? NO 2h) physically force you to have sexual YES 1 1 2 3intercourse with him ev<strong>en</strong> wh<strong>en</strong> you NO 2did not want to?i) force you to perform any sexual acts YES 1 1 2 3you did not want to? NO 21206 CHECK 1205 (a-i):AT LEAST ONENOT A SINGLE'YES' 'YES' 12091207 How long after you first got married to/started living with your NUMBER OF YEARS . . . . . . .(last) husband/partner did (this/any of these things) firsthapp<strong>en</strong>?BEFORE MARRIAGE/BEFORELIVING TOGETHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF LESS THAN ONE YEAR, RECORD '00'.1208 Did the following ever happ<strong>en</strong> as a result of whatyour (last) husband/partner did to you:a) You had cuts, bruises or aches?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2b) You had eye injuries, sprains, dislocations, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or burns? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2c) You had deep wounds, brok<strong>en</strong> bones, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1brok<strong>en</strong> teeth, or any other serious injury? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21209 Have you ever hit, slapped, kicked, or done anything <strong>el</strong>se to YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1physically hurt your (last) husband/partner at times wh<strong>en</strong> he NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1212was not already beating or physically hurting you?1210 CHECK 603:RESPONDENT ISRESPONDENT ISNOT A WIDOW A WIDOW 12121211 In the last 12 months, how oft<strong>en</strong> have you done this OFTEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1to your husband/partner: oft<strong>en</strong>, only sometimes, SOMETIMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or not at all? NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395400 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1212 Does (did) your husband/partner drink alcohol? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 12141213 How oft<strong>en</strong> does (did) he get drunk: oft<strong>en</strong>, only sometimes, OFTEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or never? SOMETIMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NEVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31214 CHECK 601 AND 602:EVER MARRIED/LIVEDWITH A MANNEVER MARRIED/ NEVERLIVED WITH A MANFrom the time you were 15 From the time you were 15 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1years old has anyone other years old has anyone ever hit, NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2than your (curr<strong>en</strong>t/last) slapped, kicked, or done REFUSED TO ANSWER/husband/partner hit, slapped, anything <strong>el</strong>se to hurt you NO ANSWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1220kicked, or done anything <strong>el</strong>se physically?to hurt you physically?1215 Who has hurt you in this way? MOTHER/STEP-MOTHER . . . . . . . . . AFATHER/STEP-FATHER . . . . . . . . . . . . BSISTER/BROTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CAnyone <strong>el</strong>se?DAUGHTER/SON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DOTHER RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EFORMER HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . FCURRENT BOYFRIEND . . . . . . . . . . . . GRECORD ALL MENTIONED.FORMER BOYFRIEND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HMOTHER-IN-LAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IFATHER-IN-LAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JOTHER IN-LAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KTEACHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LEMPLOYER/SOMEONE AT WORK . . . MPOLICE/SOLDIER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOTHER(SPECIFY)X1216 In the last 12 months, how oft<strong>en</strong> have you be<strong>en</strong> hit, OFTEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1slapped, kicked, or physically hurt by this/these person(s): SOMETIMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2oft<strong>en</strong>, only sometimes, or not at all? NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31220 CHECK 618: EVER HAD SEX?HAS EVERNEVERHAD SEX HAD SEX 12251221 The first time you had sexual intercourse, would you say that WANTED TO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you had it because you wanted to, or because you were forced to FORCED TO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2have it against your will?REFUSED TO ANSWER/NO RESPONSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31222 CHECK 601 AND 602:EVER MARRIED/LIVEDWITH A MANNEVER MARRIED/ NEVERLIVED WITH A MANIn the last 12 months, has In the last 12 months YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1anyone other than your has anyone forced you NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(curr<strong>en</strong>t/last) husband/ to have sexual intercourse REFUSED TO ANSWER/partner forced you to have against your will? NO ANSWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3sexual intercourse againstyour will?1223 CHECK 1221 AND 1222:1221 ='1' OR '3' OTHERAND 1222 ='2' OR '3' 12261224 CHECK 1205A(h) and 1205A(i):1205A(h) IS NOT '1'OTHERAND 1205A(i) IS NOT '1' 1228App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 401


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1225 At any time in your life, as a child or as an adult, has anyone YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1ever forced you in any way to have sexual intercourse NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2or perform any other sexual acts? REFUSED TO ANSWER/NO ANSWER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 12281226 How old were you the first time you were forced tohave sexual intercourse or perform any other sexual acts?AGE IN COMPLETED YEAR . . .DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981227 Who was the person who was forcing you at that time? CURRENT HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . 01FORMER HUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . 02CURRENT/FORMER BOYFRIEND . . . 03FATHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04STEP FATHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05OTHER RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06IN-LAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07OWN FRIEND/ACQUAINTANCE . . . . . 08FAMILY FRIEND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09TEACHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10EMPLOYER/SOMEONE AT WORK . . . 11POLICE/SOLDIER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12PRIEST/RELIGIOUS LEADER . . . . . . . 13STRANGER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141228 CHECK 1205A (a-i), 1214, 1222 AND 1225:OTHER_______________________ . . . 96(SPECIFY)AT LEAST ONENOT A SINGLE'YES' 'YES' 12321229 Thinking about what you yours<strong>el</strong>f have experi<strong>en</strong>ced among YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1the differ<strong>en</strong>t things we have be<strong>en</strong> talking about, have you NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1231ever tried to seek h<strong>el</strong>p to stop (the/these) person(s) fromdoing this to you again?1230 From whom have you sought h<strong>el</strong>p? OWN FAMILY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AHUSBAND/PARTNER'S FAMILY . . . . . BAnyone <strong>el</strong>se?CURRENT/LAST/LATEHUSBAND/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . CRECORD ALL MENTIONED. CURRENT/FORMER BOYFRIEND . . . DFRIEND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENEIGHBOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FRELIGIOUS LEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G 1232DOCTOR/MEDICAL PERSONNEL . . . HPOLICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ILAWYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JSOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATION . . . KCOMMUNITYLEADER/LOCAL ADMN LOTHERX(SPECIFY)1231 Have you ever told any one <strong>el</strong>se about this? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21232 As far as you know, did your father ever beat your mother? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8THANK THE RESPONDENT FOR HER COOPERATION AND REASSURE HER ABOUT THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF HERANSWERS. FILL OUT THE QUESTIONS BELOW WITH REFERENCE TO THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MODULE ONLY.1233 DID YOU HAVE TO INTERRUPT THE YES YES, MOREINTERVIEW BECAUSE SOME ADULT WAS ONCE THAN ONCE NOTRYING TO LISTEN, OR CAME INTO THE HUSBAND . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3ROOM, OR INTERFERED IN ANY OTHER OTHER MALE ADULT . . . 1 2 3WAY? FEMALE ADULT . . . . . . . 1 2 31234 INTERVIEWER'S COMMENTS / EXPLANATION FOR NOT COMPLETING THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MODULE402 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 13. FEMALE GENITAL CUTTINGNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1301 Have you ever heard of female circumcision? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1303NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21302 In some countries, there is a practice in which a girl may havepart of her g<strong>en</strong>itals cut. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Have you ever heard about this practice? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 13221303 Have you yours<strong>el</strong>f ever be<strong>en</strong> circumcised? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1309A1304 Now I would like to ask you what was done to you at that time. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1306Was any flesh removed from the g<strong>en</strong>ital area? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81305 Was the g<strong>en</strong>ital area just nicked without removing any flesh? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81306 Was your g<strong>en</strong>ital area sewn closed? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81307 How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> you were circumcised?AGE IN COMPLETED YEARS ..IF THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT KNOW THE EXACT AGE, DURING INFANCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95PROBE TO GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981308 Who performed the circumcision? TRADITIONALTRAD. CIRCUMCISER . . . . . . . . . . . 11TRAD. BIRTH ATTENDANT . . . . . . 12OTHER TRAD. 16(SPECIFY)HEALTH PROFESSIONALDOCTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21TRAINED NURSE/MIDWIFE . . . . . . 22OTHER HEALTHPROFESSIONAL 26(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981309A CHECK 214 AND 216:NUMBER OF LIVING DAUGHTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1309B CHECK 1309A:HAS ONE HAS MORE THAN HAS NO LIVINGLIVING DAUGHTER ONE LIVING DAUGHTER DAUGHTER 13191310 CHECK 1309B:ONE LIVINGDAUGHTERMORE THAN ONELIVING DAUGHTER1311 CHECK 1310:Has your daughter Have any of your daughters NUMBER CIRCUMCISED . . . . . .be<strong>en</strong> circumcised?be<strong>en</strong> circumcised?NO DAUGHTER CIRCUMCISED . . . . 00 1318IF YES: RECORD '01' IF YES: How many?ONE LIVINGMORE THAN ONEDAUGHTERLIVING DAUGHTERDAUGHTER'S LINE NUMBERWhat is your Which of your daughters was FROM Q. 212 . . . . . . . . . . . .daughter's name?circumcised most rec<strong>en</strong>tly?_____________________________(DAUGHTER'S NAME)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 403


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP1312 Now I would like to ask you what was done to (NAME OF THE YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1314DAUGHTER FROM Q. 1311) at that time. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Was any flesh removed from her g<strong>en</strong>ital area?1313 Was her g<strong>en</strong>ital area just nicked without removing any flesh? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81314 Was her g<strong>en</strong>ital area sewn closed? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81315 How old was (NAME OF THE DAUGHTER FROM Q. 1311)wh<strong>en</strong> this occurred? AGE IN COMPLETED YEARS .IF THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT KNOW THE AGE, PROBE TO DURING INFANCY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981316 Who performed the circumcision? TRADITIONALTRAD. CIRCUMCISER . . . . . . . . . . . 11TRAD. BIRTH ATTENDANT . . . . . . 12OTHER TRAD. 16(SPECIFY)HEALTH PROFESSIONALDOCTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21TRAINED NURSE/MIDWIFE . . . . . . 22OTHER HEALTHPROFESSIONAL 26(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 981317 CHECK 1309A AND 1310:1309A IS HIGHER 1309A = 1310THAN 131013191318 Do you int<strong>en</strong>d to have [your (other) daughter/any of your YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(other) daughters] circumcised? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81319 What b<strong>en</strong>efits do girls thems<strong>el</strong>ves get if they are circumcised? CLEANLINESS/HYGIENE . . . . . . . . . . . ASOCIAL ACCEPTANCE . . . . . . . . . . . BBETTER MARRIAGE PROSPECTS . . CPROBE: Any other b<strong>en</strong>efits?PRESERVE VIRGINITY/PREVENTPREMARITAL SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . DMORE SEXUAL PLEASURE FORRECORD ALL MENTIONED. THE MAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ERELIGIOUS APPROVAL . . . . . . . . . . . FOTHER(SPECIFY)NO BENEFITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .XY1320 Do you b<strong>el</strong>ieve that this practice is required by your r<strong>el</strong>igion? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81321 Do you think that this practice should be continued, or should it CONTINUED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1be stopped? STOPPED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81322RECORD THE TIME.HOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


INTERVIEWER'S OBSERVATIONSTO BE FILLED IN AFTER COMPLETING INTERVIEWCOMMENTS ABOUT RESPONDENT:COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC QUESTIONS:ANY OTHER COMMENTS:SUPERVISOR'S OBSERVATIONSNAME OF SUPERVISOR:DATE:EDITOR'S OBSERVATIONSNAME OF EDITOR:DATE:App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 405


INSTRUCTIONS: 2 04 APR 01 2ONLY ONE CODE SHOULD APPEAR IN ANY BOX. 0 03 MAR 02 0ALL MONTHS SHOULD BE FILLED IN. 0 02 FEB 03 09 01 JAN 04 912 DEC 0511 NOV 0610 OCT 07INFORMATION TO BE CODED FOR EACH COLUMN 09 SEP 082 08 AUG 09 2BIRTHS, PREGNANCIES, CONTRACEPTIVE USE 0 07 JUL 10 0B BIRTHS 0 06 JUN 11 0P PREGNANCIES 8 05 MAY 12 8T TERMINATIONS 04 APR 1303 MAR 140 NO METHOD 02 FEB 151 FEMALE STERILIZATION 01 JAN 162 MALE STERILIZATION3 PILL 12 DEC 174 IUD 11 NOV 185 INJECTABLES 10 OCT 196 IMPLANTS 09 SEP 207 CONDOM 2 08 AUG 21 28 FEMALE CONDOM 0 07 JUL 22 09 RHYTHM METHOD 0 06 JUN 23 0J WITHDRAWAL 7 05 MAY 24 7K LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD 04 APR 2503 MAR 2602 FEB 27X OTHER 01 JAN 28(SPECIFY)12 DEC 2911 NOV 3010 OCT 3109 SEP 322 08 AUG 33 20 07 JUL 34 00 06 JUN 35 06 05 MAY 36 604 APR 3703 MAR 3802 FEB 3901 JAN 4012 DEC 4111 NOV 4210 OCT 4309 SEP 442 08 AUG 45 20 07 JUL 46 00 06 JUN 47 05 05 MAY 48 504 APR 4903 MAR 5002 FEB 5101 JAN 5212 DEC 5311 NOV 5410 OCT 5509 SEP 562 08 AUG 57 20 07 JUL 58 00 06 JUN 59 04 05 MAY 60 404 APR 6103 MAR 6202 FEB 6301 JAN 6412 DEC 6511 NOV 6610 OCT 6709 SEP 682 08 AUG 69 20 07 JUL 70 00 06 JUN 71 03 05 MAY 72 304 APR 7303 MAR 7402 FEB 7501 JAN 76406 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


CONFIDENTIALKENYA NATIONAL BUREAU OF STATISTICSKENYA DEMOGRAPHIC AND HEALTH SURVEY 2008MAN'S QUESTIONNAIREIDENTIFICATIONPROVINCE*DISTRICTLOCATION/TOWNSUBLOCATION/WARDNASSEP CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .KDHS CLUSTER NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .HOUSEHOLD NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAIROBI/MOMBASA/KISUMU=1; NAKURU/ELDORET/THIKA/NYERI=2;SMALL TOWN=3; RURAL=4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .NAME OF HOUSEHOLD HEADNAME AND LINE NUMBER OF MANINTERVIEWER VISITS1 2 3FINAL VISITDATEDAYINTERVIEWER'SNAMERESULT**MONTHYEAR2 0INT. NUMBERFINAL RESULT0NEXT VISIT:DATETIMETOTAL NUMBEROF VISITS**RESULT CODES:1 COMPLETED 4 REFUSED2 NOT AT HOME 5 PARTLY COMPLETED 7 OTHER3 POSTPONED 6 INCAPACITATED (SPECIFY)LANGUAGELANGUAGE OF QUESTIONNAIRE:LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW***ENGLISHHOME LANGUAGE OF RESPONDENT***WAS A TRANSLATOR USED? (YES=1, NO=2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .***LANGUAGE CODES:01 EMBU 04 KIKUYU 07 LUO 10 MIJIKENDA 13 ENGLISH02 KALENJIN 05 KISII 08 MAASAI 11 SOMALI 14 OTHER03 KAMBA 06 LUHYA 09 MERU 12 KISWAHILISUPERVISOR FIELD EDITOR OFFICE EDITORKEYED BYNAMEDATENAMEDATE* Province: NAIROBI=1; CENTRAL=2; COAST=3; EASTERN=4; NYANZA=5; R.VALLEY=6; WESTERN=7; NORTHEASTERN=8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 407


SECTION 1. RESPONDENT'S BACKGROUNDINFORMED CONSENTH<strong>el</strong>lo. My name is ________ and I am working with the K<strong>en</strong>ya National Bureau of Statistics. We are conducting a national surveythat asks wom<strong>en</strong> about various health issues. We would very much appreciate your participation in this survey.This information will h<strong>el</strong>p the governm<strong>en</strong>t to plan health services. The survey usually takes betwe<strong>en</strong> 30 to 60 minutes to complete.Whatever information you provide will be kept confid<strong>en</strong>tial and will not be shown to anyone other than members of our survey team.Participation in this survey is voluntary, and if we should come to any question you don't want to answer, just let me know andI will go on to the next question; or you can stop the interview at any time. However, we hope that you will participate in this surveysince your views are important.At this time, do you want to ask me anything about the survey?May I begin the interview now?Signature of interviewer:Date:RESPONDENT AGREES TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . . . 1 RESPONDENT DOES NOT AGREE TO BE INTERVIEWED . . . 2 ENDNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP101 RECORD THE TIME.HOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102 First I would like to ask some questions about you and your NAIROBI/ MOMBASA/KISUMU . . . . . 1household. For most of the time untill you were 12 years old, OTHER CITY/TOWN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2did you live in Nairobi, Mombasa, in another city or town, or in COUNTRY SIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3the countryside? OUTSIDE KENYA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4103 How long have you be<strong>en</strong> living continuously in (NAME OFCURRENT PLACE OF RESIDENCE)? YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF LESS THAN ONE YEAR, RECORD '00' YEARS. ALWAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95VISITOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 106104 Just before you moved here, did you live in a city, in a town, or in NAIROBI/ MOMBASA/KISUMU . . . . . 1the countryside? OTHER CITY/TOWN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2COUNTRY SIDE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OUTSIDE KENYA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4106 In what month and year were you born?MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DON'T KNOW MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 98YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .DON'T KNOW YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998107 How old were you at your last birthday?COMPARE AND CORRECT 106 AND/OR 107 IF INCONSISTENT.AGE IN COMPLETED YEARS108 Have you ever att<strong>en</strong>ded school? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 112109 What is the highest lev<strong>el</strong> of school you att<strong>en</strong>ded: PRIMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1primary, vocational, secondary, or higher? POST-PRIMARY/VOCATIONAL . . . . . 2SECONDARY/'A' LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . 3COLLEGE (MIDDLE LEVEL) . . . . . . . . 4UNIVERSITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5110 What is the highest (standard/form/year) you completed at thatlev<strong>el</strong>? IF NONE, WRITE '00'. STANDARD/FORM/YEAR . . .408 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP111 CHECK 109:PRIMARY,SECONDARYPOST-PRIMARY/VOCATIONAL, OR HIGHER 115112 Now I would like you to read this s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce to me. CANNOT READ AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . 1ABLE TO READ ONLY PARTS OFSHOW SENTENCES BELOW TO RESPONDENT. SENTENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2ABLE TO READ WHOLE SENTENCE. . 3IF RESPONDENT CANNOT READ WHOLE SENTENCE, PROBE: NO CARD WITH REQUIREDCan you read any part of the s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce to me? LANGUAGE 4(SPECIFY LANGUAGE)BLIND/VISUALLY IMPAIRED . . . . . . . 5113 Have you ever participated in a literacy program or any otherprogram that involves learning to read or write (not including YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1primary school)? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2114 CHECK 112:CODE '2', '3' CODE '1' OR '5'OR '4' CIRCLED 116CIRCLED115 Do you read a newspaper or magazine almost every day, at least ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1once a week, less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4116 Do you list<strong>en</strong> to the radio almost every day, at least once a week, ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4117 Do you watch t<strong>el</strong>evision almost every day, at least once a week, ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1less than once a week or not at all? AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . . . 2LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4118 What is your r<strong>el</strong>igion? ROMAN CATHOLIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1PROTESTANT/OTHER CHRISTIAN . . . 2MUSLIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3NO RELIGION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)119 What is your ethnic group/tribe? EMBU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01KALENJIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02KAMBA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03KIKUYU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04KISII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 05LUHYA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06LUO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07MASAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 08MERU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09MIJIKENDA/SWAHILI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10SOMALI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11TAITA/TAVETA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12OTHER 96(SPECIFY)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 409


SECTION 2. REPRODUCTIONNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP201 Now I would like to ask about any childr<strong>en</strong> you have had duringyour life. I am interested in all of the childr<strong>en</strong> that are biologicallyyours, ev<strong>en</strong> if they are not legally yours or do not have your YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1last name. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Have you ever fathered any childr<strong>en</strong> with any woman? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 206202 Do you have any sons or daughters that you have fathered who YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1are now living with you? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 204203 How many sons live with you?And how many daughters live with you?IF NONE, RECORD ‘00'.SONS AT HOME . . . . . . . . . . . . .DAUGHTERS AT HOME . . . . . .204 Do you have any sons or daughters that you have fathered who are YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1alive but do not live with you? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 206205 How many sons are alive but do not live with you?And how many daughters are alive but do not live with you?IF NONE, RECORD ‘00'.SONS ELSEWHERE . . . . . . . . .DAUGHTERS ELSEWHERE . . . .206 Have you ever fathered a son or a daughter who was born alivebut later died?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IF NO, PROBE: Any baby who cried or showed signs of life but NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2did not survive? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 208207 How many boys have died?And how many girls have died?IF NONE, RECORD ‘00'.208 SUM ANSWERS TO 203, 205, AND 207, AND ENTER TOTAL.IF NONE, RECORD ‘00'.BOYS DEAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .GIRLS DEAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .TOTAL CHILDREN . . . . . . . . . . .209 CHECK 208:HAS HAD HAS HAD 212MORE THANONLYONE CHILD ONE CHILD HAS NOT HADANY CHILDREN 301210 Did all of the childr<strong>en</strong> you have fathered have the same YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 212biological mother? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2211 In all, how many wom<strong>en</strong> have you fathered childr<strong>en</strong> with?212 How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> your (first) child was born?NUMBER OF WOMEN . . . . . .AGE IN YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . .213 CHECK 203 AND 205:AT LEAST ONELIVING CHILDNO LIVINGCHILDREN301410 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP214 How old is your (youngest) child?AGE IN YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . .215 CHECK 214:(YOUNGEST) CHILDIS AGE 0-3 YEARSOTHER301216 What is the name of your (youngest) child?WRITE NAME OF (YOUNGEST) CHILD(NAME OF (YOUNGEST) CHILD)217 Wh<strong>en</strong> (NAME)'s mother was pregnant with (NAME), YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1did she have any ant<strong>en</strong>atal check-ups? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 219218 Were you ever pres<strong>en</strong>t during any of those ant<strong>en</strong>atal PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1check-ups? NOT PRESENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2219 Was (NAME) born in a hospital or health facility? HOSPITAL/HEALTH FACILITY . . . . . 1 221OTHER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2220 What was the main reason why (NAME)'s mother did not COST TOO MUCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01d<strong>el</strong>iver in a hospital or health facility? FACILITY CLOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02TOO FAR/NO TRANSPORTATION . . . 03DON'T TRUST FACILITY/POORQUALITY SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . 04NO FEMALE PROVIDER . . . . . . . . . . 05NOT THE FIRST CHILD . . . . . . . . . . . . 06CHILD'S MOTHER DID NOTTHINK IT WAS NECESSARY . . . . . 07HE DID NOT THINKIT WAS NECESSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . 08FAMILY DID NOT THINK IT WASNECESSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 09OTHER 96(SPECIFY)DON"T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98221 Wh<strong>en</strong> a child has diarrhea, how much should MORE THAN USUAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1he or she be giv<strong>en</strong> to drink: more than usual, the same ABOUT THE SAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2amount as usual, less than usual, or should he or she LESS THAN USUAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3not be giv<strong>en</strong> anything to drink at all? NOTHING TO DRINK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 411


SECTION 3. CONTRACEPTION301 Now I would like to talk about family planning - the various ways or methods that 302 Have you or partner evera couple can use to d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoid a pregnancy.used (METHOD)?Which ways or methods have you heard about?FOR METHODS NOT MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY, ASK:Have you ever heard of (METHOD)?CIRCLE CODE 1 IN 301 FOR EACH METHOD MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY.THEN PROCEED DOWN COLUMN 301, READING THE NAME AND DESCRIPTION OFEACH METHOD NOT MENTIONED SPONTANEOUSLY. CIRCLE CODE 1 IF METHODIS RECOGNIZED, AND CODE 2 IF NOT RECOGNIZED. THEN, FOR METHODS 02, 07, 10,AND 11, ASK 302 IF 301 HAS CODE 1 CIRCLED.01 FEMALE STERILIZATION Wom<strong>en</strong> can have an operation YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever had a partnerto avoid having any more childr<strong>en</strong>. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 who had an operation to avoidhaving any more childr<strong>en</strong>?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 MALE STERILIZATION M<strong>en</strong> can have an operation to avoid YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever had an operationhaving any more childr<strong>en</strong>. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 to avoid having any morechildr<strong>en</strong>?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 PILL Wom<strong>en</strong> can take a pill every day to avoid becoming YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1pregnant. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 IUD Wom<strong>en</strong> can have a loop or coil placed inside them by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a doctor or a nurse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 INJECTABLES Wom<strong>en</strong> can have an injection by a health YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1provider that stops them from becoming pregnant NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2for one or more months.06 IMPLANTS Wom<strong>en</strong> can have several small rods placed in YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1their upper arm by a doctor or nurse which can prev<strong>en</strong>t NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2pregnancy for one or more years.07 CONDOM M<strong>en</strong> can put a rubber sheath on their p<strong>en</strong>is YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever used a condom?before sexual ntercourse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 FEMALE CONDOM Wom<strong>en</strong> can place a sheath in their YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1vagina before sexual intercourse. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD (LAM) YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 RHYTHM METHOD Every month that a woman is sexually YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you and your partner everactive she can avoid pregnancy by not having sexual NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 used rhythm method?intercourse on the days of the month she is most lik<strong>el</strong>y to YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1get pregnant. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 WITHDRAWAL M<strong>en</strong> can be careful and pull out before YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Have you ever used theclimax. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 withdrawal method?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION As an emerg<strong>en</strong>cy YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1measure after sexual intercourse, wom<strong>en</strong> can take special NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2pills at any time within 5 days to prev<strong>en</strong>t pregnancy.13 Have you heard of any other ways or methods that wom<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1or m<strong>en</strong> can use to avoid pregnancy?YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(SPECIFY) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(SPECIFY) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . 2412 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP302A CHECK 302:AT LEAST ONENOT A SINGLE"YES" "YES" 303(EVER USED)(NEVER USED)302B Are you curr<strong>en</strong>tly doing something or using any method with YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1any partner to d<strong>el</strong>ay or avoid a pregnancy? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 303302C Which method are you using? FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . A 302EMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . BCIRCLE ALL MENTIONED. PILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DIF MORE THAN ONE METHOD MENTIONED, FOLLOW SKIP INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E 302EINSTRUCTION FOR HIGHEST METHOD IN LIST. IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GFEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HLACTATIONAL AMENORRHOEA M. . I 302ERHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LWITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MOTHER _______________________ X 302E(SPECIFY)302D Does your wife/partner know that you are using YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1a method of family planning? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8302E Would you say that using contraception is mainly your MAINLY RESPONDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . 1decision, mainly your wife's/partner's decision, or did MAINLY WIFE/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . 2you both decide together? JOINT DECISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER 6(SPECIFY)303 In the last few months have you: YES NOHeard about family planning on the radio? RADIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Se<strong>en</strong> about family planning on the t<strong>el</strong>evision? TELEVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Read about family planning in a newspaper or magazine? NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINE 1 2304 In the last few months, have you talked about family YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1planning with a health worker or health professional? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2305 Now I would like to ask you about a woman's risk of pregnancy.From one m<strong>en</strong>strual period to the next, are there certain days YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1wh<strong>en</strong> a woman is more lik<strong>el</strong>y to become pregnant if she has NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2sexual r<strong>el</strong>ations? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 307306 Is this time just before her period begins, during her period, right JUST BEFORE HER PERIOD BEGINS .. 1after her period has <strong>en</strong>ded, or halfway betwe<strong>en</strong> two periods? DURING HER PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . 2RIGHT AFTER HERPERIOD HAS ENDED . . . . . . . . . . . . 3HALFWAY BETWEEN 2 PERIODS . . . 4OTHER 6(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8307 Do you think that a woman who is breastfeeding her baby can YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1become pregnant? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8308 I will now read you some statem<strong>en</strong>ts about contraception. Please DISt<strong>el</strong>lme if you agree or disagree with each one. AGREE AGREE DKa) Contraception is wom<strong>en</strong>'s business and a man should not CONTRACEPTIONhave to worry about it. WOMAN'S BUSINESS . 1 2 8b) Wom<strong>en</strong> who use contraception may become promiscuous. WOMAN MAY BECOMEPROMISCUOUS . . . 1 2 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 413


309 CHECK 301 (07) KNOWS MALE CONDOMYESNO401310 Do you know of a place where a person can get condoms? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 401311 Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVT. HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BAny other place? GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . CGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . DPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE AND CIRCLETHE APPROPRIATE CODE. OTHER PUBLIC E(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTOROR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITEFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONTHE NAME OF THE PLACE.HOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . FFHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G(NAME OF PLACE(S)) PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . HPHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . . . . . INURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . JOTHER PRIV. MEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LCOMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR MSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NFRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . POTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)312 If you wanted to, could you yours<strong>el</strong>f get a condom? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2414 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 4. MARRIAGE AND SEXUAL ACTIVITYNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP401 Are you curr<strong>en</strong>tly married or living together with a woman as if YES, CURRENTLY MARRIED . . . . . . . 1married? YES, LIVING WITH A WOMAN . . . . . 2 404NO, NOT IN UNION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3402 Have you ever be<strong>en</strong> married or lived together with a woman as if YES, FORMERLY MARRIED . . . . . . . 1married? YES, LIVED WITH A WOMAN . . . . . . . 2NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 413403 What is your marital status now: are you widowed, WIDOWED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1divorced, or separated? DIVORCED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 410SEPARATED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3404 Is your wife/partner living with you now or is she staying LIVING WITH HIM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>el</strong>sewhere? STAYING ELSEWHERE . . . . . . . . . . . . 2405 Do you have more than one wife or woman you live with as if YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1married? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 407406 Altogether, how many wives do you have or other partners TOTAL NUMBER OF WIVESdo you live with as if married? AND LIVE-IN PARTNERS . . .407 CHECK 405: 408 Howold wasONE WIFE/ MORE THAN (NAME)PARTNER ONE WIFE/ on herPARTNERlastPlease t<strong>el</strong>l me the name of Please t<strong>el</strong>l me the name of birthday?your wife (the woman youeach of your curr<strong>en</strong>t wivesare living with as if married).(and/or of each woman youare living with as if married).RECORD THE NAME AND THE LINE NUMBER FROMTHE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE FOR EACH WIFEAND LIVE-IN PARTNER.LINENAME NUMBER AGE____________IF A WOMAN IS NOT LISTED IN THE HOUSEHOLD,RECORD '00'.ASK 408 FOR EACH PERSON.____________________________________409 CHECK 407:MORE THANONE WIFE/ONE WIFE/PARTNER PARTNER 411A410 Have you be<strong>en</strong> married or lived with a woman only once or ONLY ONCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1more than once? MORE THAN ONCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 411A411 In what month and year did you start living with your (wife/partner)?MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .411A Now I would like to ask a question about your first wife/partner.In what month and year did you start living with your first wife/ DON'T KNOW MONTH . . . . . . . . . . . . 98partner?YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . .413DON'T KNOW YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . 9998App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 415


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP412 How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> you first started living with her?AGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .413 CHECK FOR THE PRESENCE OF OTHERS.BEFORE CONTINUING, MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE PRIVACY.414 Now I would like to ask you some questions about sexual NEVER HAD SEXUALactivity in order to gain a better understanding of some INTERCOURSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00important life issues.How old were you wh<strong>en</strong> you had sexual intercourse for the AGE IN YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . .417very first time?FIRST TIME WHEN STARTEDLIVING WITH (FIRST)WIFE/PARTNER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95 417415 CHECK 107: AGE AGE15-24 25-54 501416 Do you int<strong>en</strong>d to wait until you get married to have sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse for the first time? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 501DON'T KNOW/UNSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.417 CHECK 107: AGE AGE15-24 25-54 419418 The first time you had sexual intercourse, was a condom YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1used? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/DON'T REMEMBER . . . 8419 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you had sexual intercourse?DAYS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . 1IF LESS THAN 12 MONTHS, ANSWER MUST BE RECORDEDIN DAYS, WEEKS OR MONTHS. WEEKS AGO . . . . . . . . . 2IF 12 MONTHS (ONE YEAR) OR MORE, ANSWER MUST BERECORDED IN YEARS. MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . 3YEARS AGO . . . . . . . . . 4 435416 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


LASTSEXUAL PARTNERSECOND-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNERTHIRD-TO-LASTSEXUAL PARTNER420 Now I would like to ask you some questions about your rec<strong>en</strong>t sexual activity. Let me assure you againthat your answers are complet<strong>el</strong>y confid<strong>en</strong>tial and will not be told to anyone. If we should come to anyquestion that you don't want to answer, just let me know and we will go to the next question. SKIP TO 422421 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you hadsexual intercourse with this person? DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1WEEKS 2 WEEKS 2MONTHS 3 MONTHS 3422 The last time you had sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse (with this second/third NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2person), was a condom used? (SKIP TO 424) (SKIP TO 424) (SKIP TO 424)423 Was a condom used every YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1time you had sexual intercourse NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2with this person in the last12 months?424 What was your r<strong>el</strong>ationship to WIFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 WIFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 WIFE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1this (second/third) person with (SKIP TO 426) (SKIP TO 426) (SKIP TO 426)whom you had sexual intercourse? LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2 LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2 LIVE-IN PARTNER . . . . 2GIRLFRIEND NOT GIRLFRIEND NOT GIRLFRIEND NOTIF GIRLFRIEND: LIVING WITH LIVING WITH LIVING WITHWere you living together as if RESPONDENT . . . . 3 RESPONDENT . . . . 3 RESPONDENT . . . . 3married? CASUAL CASUAL CASUALIF YES, CIRCLE '2'. ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4 ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4 ACQUAINTANCE . . . 4IF NO, CIRCLE '3'. PROSTITUTE . . . . . . . . . 5 PROSTITUTE . . . . . . . . . 5 PROSTITUTE . . . . . . . . . 5OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6 OTHER ______________ 6(SPECIFY) (SPECIFY) (SPECIFY)425 For how long (have you had/didyou have) a sexual r<strong>el</strong>ationship DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1 DAYS . 1with this (second/third) person?IF ONLY HAD SEXUAL MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2 MONTHS 2RELATIONS WITH THIS PERSONONCE, RECORD '01' DAYS. YEARS 3 YEARS 3 YEARS 3426 The last time you had sexual YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1intercourse with this (second/third) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2person, did you or this person (SKIP TO 428) (SKIP TO 428) (SKIP TO 429)drink alcohol?427 Were you or your partner drunk RESPONDENT ONLY 1 RESPONDENT ONLY 1 RESPONDENT ONLY 1at that time? PARTNER ONLY . . . 2 PARTNER ONLY . . . 2 PARTNER ONLY . . . 2RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT ANDIF YES: Who was drunk? PARTNER BOTH . 3 PARTNER BOTH . 3 PARTNER BOTH . 3NEITHER . . . . . . . . . . 4 NEITHER . . . . . . . . . . 4 NEITHER . . . . . . . . . . 4428 Apart from [this person/these two YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1people], have you had sexual (GO BACK TO 421 (GO BACK TO 421intercourse with any other IN NEXT COLUMN) IN NEXT COLUMN)person in the last 12 months? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2(SKIP TO 430) (SKIP TO 430)429 In total, with how many differ<strong>en</strong>t NUMBER OFpeople have you had sexualPARTNERSintercourse in the last 12 months? LAST 12MONTHS . . .IF NON-NUMERIC ANSWER,PROBE TO GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . .98IF NUMBER OF PARTNERS ISGREATER THAN 95, WRITE '95.'App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 417


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP430 CHECK 424 (ALL COLUMNS):AT LEAST ONE PARTNERNO PARTNERSIS PROSTITUTE ARE PROSTITUTES 432431 CHECK 424 AND 422 (ALL COLUMNS):OTHERCONDOM USED WITHEVERY PROSTITUTE 434435432 In the last 12 months, did you pay anyone in exchange YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for having sexual intercourse? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 435433 The last time you paid someone in exchange for YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1having sexual intercourse, was a (male/famale) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 435condom used?434 Was a condom used during sexual intercourse YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1every time you paid someone in exchange for NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2having sexual intercourse in the last 12 months? DK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8435 In total, with how many differ<strong>en</strong>t people have you had sexual NUMBER OF PARTNERSintercourse in your lifetime? IN LIFETIME . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IF NON-NUMERIC ANSWER, PROBE TO GET AN ESTIMATE. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98IF NUMBER OF PARTNERS IS GREATER THAN 95,WRITE '95.'436 CHECK 422, MOST RECENT PARTNER (FIRST COLUMN):NOTASKED 442CONDOMNO CONDOMUSED USED 442437 You told me that a condom was used the last time you had sex. PACKAGE SEEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1May I see the package of condoms you were using at that time?RECORD NAME OF BRAND IF PACKAGE SEEN.BRAND NAME(SPECIFY)439438 Do you know the brand name of the condom used atthat time?DOES NOT HAVE/NOT SEEN . . . . . 2BRAND NAME(SPECIFY)RECORD NAME OF BRAND. DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98439 How many condoms did you get the last time? NUMBER OFCONDOMS . . . . . . . . .DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998440 The last time you obtained the condoms, how muchdid you pay in total, including the cost of the condom(s) COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .and any consultation you may have had?FREE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 995DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998418 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP441 Where did you get the condom the last time? PUBLIC SECTORGOVT. HOSPITAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11PROBE TO IDENTIFY TYPE OF SOURCE AND CIRCLE GOVT. HEALTH CENTER . . . . . . . 12THE APPROPRIATE CODE. GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . 13IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTER OTHER PUBLIC 16OR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, WRITE(SPECIFY)THE NAME OF THE PLACE.PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORFAITH-BASED, CHURCH, MISSIONHOSPITAL / CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . 21(NAME OF PLACE)FHOK/FPAK HEALTH CENTER/CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . 23PHARMACY/CHEMIST . . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOME . . . . . 25OTHER PRIV. MEDICAL 26(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCEMOBILE CLINIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31COMMUNITY-BASED DISTRIBUTOR 41SHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51FRIEND/RELATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61442 CHECK 302 (02): RESPONDENT EVER STERILIZEDOTHER _________________________ 96(SPECIFY)NO YES 501443 The last time you had sex did you or your partner use any YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1method (other than a condom) to avoid or prev<strong>en</strong>t a NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2pregnancy? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 501444 What method did you or your partner use? FEMALE STERILIZATION . . . . . . . . . APILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CPROBE:IUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DDid you or your partner use any other method to prev<strong>en</strong>t INJECTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Epregnancy? IMPLANTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FCONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GRECORD ALL MENTIONED. FEMALE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HLACTATION AMENORRHEA METHOD IRHYTHM METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LWITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MOTHER _______________________ X(SPECIFY)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 419


SECTION 5. FERTILITY PREFERENCESNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP501 CHECK 407:ONE OR MOREQUESTIONWIVES/PARTNERS NOT ASKED 508502 CHECK 302:MAN NOTMANSTERILIZED STERILIZED 508503 (Is your wife (partner) orAre any of your wives (partners)) YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1curr<strong>en</strong>tly pregnant? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8504 CHECK 503:NO WIFE/PARTNERWIFE(WIVES)/PREGNANT ORPARTNER(S)DON'T KNOWPREGNANTHAVE (A/ANOTHER) CHILD . . . . . . . 1Now I have some questions Now I have some questions NO MORE/NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2about the future. about the future. COUPLE INFECUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Would you like to have After the child(r<strong>en</strong>) you and your WIFE (WIVES)/PARTNER(S) 508(a/another) child, or would you (wife(wives)/partner(s)) are STERILIZED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4prefer not to have any (more) expecting now, would you UNDECIDED/DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . 8childr<strong>en</strong>?like to have another child, orwould you prefer not to haveany more childr<strong>en</strong>?505 CHECK 407:ONE WIFE/MORE THANPARTNER ONE WIFE/ 507PARTNER506 CHECK 503:WIFE/PARTNER WIFE/PARTNER MONTHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NOT PREGNANTPREGNANTOR DON'T KNOW YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2How long would you like to wait After the birth of the child you SOON/NOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993 508from now before the birth of are expecting now, how long COUPLE INFECUND . . . . . . . . . . . . 994(a/another) child?would you like to wait beforethe birth of another child? OTHER _______________________ 996(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998507 How long would you like to wait from now before the birth of(a/another) child? MONTHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1YEARS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SOON/NOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 993HE/ALL HIS WIVES/PARTNERSARE INFECUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 994OTHER _______________________ 996(SPECIFY)DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 998420 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP508 CHECK 203 AND 205:HAS LIVING CHILDRENNO LIVING CHILDRENNONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 601If you could go back to the time If you could choose exactly theyou did not have any childr<strong>en</strong> number of childr<strong>en</strong> to have in NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .and could choose exactly the your whole life, how manynumber of childr<strong>en</strong> to have in would that be?your whole life, how many OTHER _______________________ 96 601would that be?(SPECIFY)PROBE FOR A NUMERIC RESPONSE.509 How many of these childr<strong>en</strong> would you like to be boys, how many BOYS GIRLS EITHERwould you like to be girls and for how many would the sex notmatter?NUMBEROTHER _______________________ 96(SPECIFY)App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 421


SECTION 6. EMPLOYMENT AND GENDER ROLESNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP601 Have you done any work in the last sev<strong>en</strong> days? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 604NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2602 Although you did not work in the last sev<strong>en</strong> days, do you haveany job or business from which you were abs<strong>en</strong>t for leave, YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 604illness, vacation, or any other such reason? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2603 Have you done any work in the last 12 months? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 613604 What is your occupation, that is, what kind of work do you mainlydo?605 CHECK 604:WORKS INDOES NOT WORKAGRICULTURE IN AGRICULTURE 607606 Do you work mainly on your own land or on family land, or do you OWN LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1work on land that you r<strong>en</strong>t from someone <strong>el</strong>se, or do you work on FAMILY LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2someone <strong>el</strong>se's land? RENTED LAND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3SOMEONE ELSE'S LAND . . . . . . . . . 4 607OTHER 6(SPECIFY)606A Think back over the past year. Were there any times wh<strong>en</strong> your NEVER / SELDOM/ ONLY A FEW TIMES 1household did not have <strong>en</strong>ough food to eat? How oft<strong>en</strong> OFTEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2did it happ<strong>en</strong> that people w<strong>en</strong>t hungry because there was ALWAYS / EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . . . 3not <strong>en</strong>ough food?606B Do you b<strong>el</strong>ieve there is suffici<strong>en</strong>t land here for your childr<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1to stay and live? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2607 Do you do this work for a member of your family, for someone FOR FAMILY MEMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . 1<strong>el</strong>se, or are you s<strong>el</strong>f-employed? FOR SOMEONE ELSE . . . . . . . . . . . . 2SELF-EMPLOYED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3608 Do you usually work throughout the year, or do you work THROUGHOUT THE YEAR . . . . . . . . . 1seasonally, or only once in a while? SEASONALLY/PART OF THE YEAR . 2ONCE IN A WHILE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3609 Are you paid in cash or kind for this work or are you not CASH ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1paid at all? CASH AND KIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2IN KIND ONLY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3NOT PAID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4610 CHECK 407:ONE OR MOREQUESTIONWIVES/PARTNERS NOT ASKED 613611 CHECK 609:CODE 1 OR 2 OTHER 613CIRCLED612 Who usually decides how the money you earn will be used: RESPONDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1mainly you, mainly your (wife (wives)/partner(s)), or WIFE(WIVES)/PARTNER(S) . . . . . . 2you and your (wife (wives)/partner(s)) jointly?RESPONDENT AND WIFE (WIVES)/PARTNER(S) JOINTLY . . . . . . . . . 3OTHER 6SPECIFY422 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP613 In a couple, who do you think should have the greater say inDON'Teach of the following decisions: the husband, the wife or both HUS- BOTH KNOW/equally: BAND WIFE EQUALLY DEPENDSa) making major household purchases? a) 1 2 3 8b) making purchases for daily household needs? b) 1 2 3 8c) deciding about visits to the wife's family or r<strong>el</strong>atives? c) 1 2 3 8d) deciding what to do with the money she earns for her d) 1 2 3 8work?e) deciding how many childr<strong>en</strong> to have and wh<strong>en</strong>? e) 1 2 3 8614 I will now read you some statem<strong>en</strong>ts about pregnancy. DIS-Please t<strong>el</strong>l me if you agree or disagree with them. AGREE AGREE DKa) Childbearing is a woman's concern and there is no CHILDBEARINGneed for the father to get involved. WOMAN'S CONCERN 1 2 8b) It is crucial for the mother's and child's health that a DOCTOR/NURSE'Swoman have assistance from a doctor or nurse at d<strong>el</strong>ivery. ASSISTANCECRUCIAL 1 2 8615 Sometimes a husband is annoyed or angered by things that hiswife does. In your opinion, is a husband justified in hitting orbeating his wife in the following situations: YES NO DKIf she goes out without t<strong>el</strong>ling him? GOES OUT . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8If she neglects the childr<strong>en</strong>? NEGL. CHILDREN . . . 1 2 8If she argues with him? ARGUES . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 8If she refuses to have sex with him? REFUSES SEX ..... . . . . 1 2 8If she burns the food? BURNS FOOD . . . . . . . 1 2 8616 Do you think that if a woman refuses to have sex with herhusband wh<strong>en</strong> he wants her to, he has the right to…DON'TKNOW/YES NO DEPENDSa) Get angry and reprimand her? a) 1 2 8b) Refuse to give her money or other means of support? b) 1 2 8c) Use force and have sex with her ev<strong>en</strong> if she doesn't c) 1 2 8want to?d) Have sex with another woman? d) 1 2 8App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 423


SECTION 7. HIV/AIDSNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP701 Now I would like to talk about something <strong>el</strong>se. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Have you ever heard of an illness called AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 717702 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1by having just one uninfected sex partner who has no other NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2sex partners? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8703 Can people get the AIDS virus from mosquito bites? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8704 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1using a condom every time they have sex? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8705 Can people get the AIDS virus by sharing food with a person YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1who has AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8706 Can people reduce their chance of getting the AIDS virus by YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1not having sexual intercourse at all? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8707 Can people get the AIDS virus because of witchcraft or other YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1supernatural means? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8708A Is there anything <strong>el</strong>se a person can do to avoid getting YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AIDS or the virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 709DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 709708B What can a person do? ABSTAIN FROM SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AUSE CONDOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BLIMIT SEX TO ONE PARTNER/STAYFAITHFUL TO ONE PARTNER . . . . . CAnything <strong>el</strong>se?LIMIT NUMBER OF SEX PARTNER . . . DAVOID SEX WITH PROSTITUTES. . . . . EAVOID SEX WITH PERSONS WHOCIRCLE ALL MENTIONED HAVE MANY PARTNERS . . . . . . . . . FAVOID SEX WITH HOMOSEXUALS . . . GAVOID SEX WITH DRUG USERS . . . . . HAVOID BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS . . . . . IAVOID INJECTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JAVOID SHARING RAZORS/BLADES. . . KAVOID KISSING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LAVOID MOSQUITO BITES . . . . . . . . . MSEEK PROTECTION FROMTRADITIONAL HEALER . . . . . . . . . NOTHERS (SPECIFY)OTHERS (SPECIFY)DON'T KNOWWXZ709 Is it possible for a healthy-looking person to have the YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8710 Do you know someone personally who has the virus that YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1causes AIDS or someone who died of AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2711 Can the virus that causes AIDS be transmitted from a mother toher baby: YES NO DKDuring pregnancy? DURING PREG. . . . . . 1 2 8During d<strong>el</strong>ivery? DURING DELIVERY . . . 1 2 8By breastfeeding? BREASTFEEDING . . . 1 2 8424 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP712 CHECK 711:AT LEASTOTHERONE 'YES' 713712A Are there any special drugs that a doctor or a nurse can YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1give to a woman infected with the AIDS virus to reduce the risk NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2of transmission to the baby? DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8713 CHECK 401:YES, CURRENTLY MARRIED/ FORMERLY MARRIED/ NEVER MARRIED/LIVING WITH A WOMAN LIVED WITH A WOMAN NEVER LIVEDWITH A WOMAN714A714 Have you ever talked with (your wife/the woman you are YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1with) about ways to prev<strong>en</strong>t getting the virus that causes NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2AIDS?714A Would you buy fresh vegetables from a shopkeeper or YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1v<strong>en</strong>dor if you knew that this person had the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8715 If a member of your family got infected with the AIDS virus, YES, REMAIN A SECRET . . . . . . . . . 1would you want it to remain a secret or not? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . 8716 If a member of your family became sick with AIDS, would YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you be willing to care for her or him in your own household? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . 8716A In your opinion, if a female teacher has the AIDS virus, SHOULD BE ALLOWED . . . . . . . . . . . . 1but is not sick, should she be allowed to continue teaching SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED . . . . . . . 2in the school? DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . 8716B Should childr<strong>en</strong> age 12-14 years be taught about using YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1condoms to avoid getting AIDS? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . 8716B1 Do you think your chances of getting AIDS are small, NO RISK AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1moderate, great or no risk at all? SMALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2MODERATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 716B3GREAT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4HAS AIDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 716B4716B2 Why do you think that you have (no risk/small chance) of IS NOT HAVING SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agetting AIDS? Any reasons? USES CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BHAS ONLY ONE PARTNER . . . . . . . . . CCIRCLE ALL MENTIONEDLIMITS THE NUMBER OF PARTNERS .. DPATNER HAS NO OTHER PATNERS .. EOTHERSX(SPECIFY)716B4716B3 Why do you think that you have (moderate/great) chance of DOES NOT USE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . Agetting AIDS? Any reasons? HAS MORE THAN ONE SEX PARTNER BPARTNER HAS OTHER PARTNERS . . . CCIRCLE ALL MENTIONED HOMOSEXUAL CONTACTS . . . . . . . . . DHAD BLOOD TRANSFUSION/INJECTION EOTHERSX(SPECIFY)716B4 Have you ever heard of VCT? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2716C I do not want to know the results, but have you ever be<strong>en</strong> YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1tested to see if you have the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 716D716C1 Wh<strong>en</strong> was the last time you were ever tested? LESS THAN 12 MONTHS AGO . . . . . 112-23 MONTHS AGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 YEARS OR MORE AGO . . . . . . . . . 3App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 425


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP716C2 The last time you were tested, did you ask for the test, was ASKED FOR TEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1it offered to you and you accepted, or was ir required? OFFERED AND ACCEPTED . . . . . . . . . 2REQUIRED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3716C3 I do not want to know the results, but did you get the results YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1of the test? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2716C4 Where was the test done? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . 11GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 12IF SOURCE IS HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTRE OR CLINIC, GOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . 13WRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE. PROBE TO IDENTIFYTHE TYPE SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE. OTHER PUBLIC 16(SPECIFY)NAME OF PLACEPRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORMISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINIC21FPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . 22IF NURSING/MATERNITY HOME, ASK IF IT IS RUN BY A PRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . 23CHURCH OR MISSION. IF SO, CIRCLE CODE ''21". VCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24NURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . 25BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES 26OTHER PRIVATEMEDICAL 27(SPECIFY)717OTHER 96(SPECIFY)716D Would you want to be tested for the AIDS virus? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DK/NOT SURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8716E Do you know of a place where people can go to get tested YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1for the AIDS virus? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 717716F Where is that? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . AAny other place?GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . BGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . CIF SOURCE IS HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTRE OR CLINIC, OTHER PUBLIC DWRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE. PROBE TO IDENTIFY(SPECIFY)THE TYPE SOURCE AND CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATECODE(S).PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORMISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINICENAME OF PLACEFPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . FPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . GVCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HIF NURSING/MATERNITY HOME, ASK IF IT IS RUN BY A NURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . ICHURCH OR MISSION. IF SO, CIRCLE CODE ''E". BLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES JOTHER PRIVATEMEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER(SPECIFY)X717 CHECK 701:HEARD ABOUTAIDSNOT HEARDABOUT AIDSApart from AIDS, have Have you heard about infectionsyou heard about other that can be transmitted throughinfections that can be sexual contact? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1transmitted through NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 719Asexual contact?426 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP718 If a man has a sexually transmitted disease, what symptoms ABDOMINAL PAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amight he have?GENITAL DISCHARGE/DRIPPING. . . . . BFOUL SMELL/DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . CBURNING PAIN ON URINATION . . . . . DAny others?REDNESS/INFLAMATION IN GENITALAREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESWELLING IN GENITAL AREA . . . . . . . FGENITAL SORES/ULCERS . . . . . . . . . GGENITAL WARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HRECORD ALL MENTIONED GENITAL ITCHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IBLOOD IN URINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JLOSS OF WEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KIMPOTENCE/NO ERECTION. . . . . . . . . LOTHERSW(SPECIFY)OTHERSX(SPECIFY)NO SYMPTOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YDOES NOT KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z719 If a woman has a sexually transmitted disease, what ABDOMINAL PAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asymptoms might she have?GENITAL DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BFOUL SMELL/DISCHARGE . . . . . . . . . CBURNING PAIN ON URINATION . . . . . DAny others?REDNESS/INFLAMATION IN GENITALAREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ESWELLING IN GENITAL AREA . . . . . . . FGENITAL SORES/ULCERS . . . . . . . . . GGENITAL WARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HRECORD ALL MENTIONED GENITAL ITCHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IBLOOD IN URINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JLOSS OF WEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KHARD TO GET PREGNANT . . . . . . . . . LOTHERSW(SPECIFY)OTHERSX(SPECIFY)NO SYMPTOMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YDOES NOT KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z719A CHECK 414:HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSEHAS NOT HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE801719A1CHECK 717: HEARD ABOUT OTHER SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS?YES NO 719C719B Now I would like to ask you some questions about your YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1health in the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months. During the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2months have you had a sexually transmitted disease? DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8719C Sometimes m<strong>en</strong> experi<strong>en</strong>ce an abnormal discharge from YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1their p<strong>en</strong>is. During the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months, have you had an NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2abnomal discharge from your p<strong>en</strong>is? DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8719D Sometimes m<strong>en</strong> have a sore or ulcer on or near their p<strong>en</strong>is. YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1During the last tw<strong>el</strong>ve months have you had a sore or ulcer NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2on or near your p<strong>en</strong>is? DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8719E CHECK 719B, 719C AND 719D HAS NOT HADHAS HAD AN INFECTIONAN INFECTION OR(ANY 'YES') DOES NOT KNOW 801719F Last time you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 719B/719C/719D), did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you seek any kind of advice or treatm<strong>en</strong>t? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 719HApp<strong>en</strong>dix E | 427


NO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP719G Where did you go? PUBLIC SECTORGOVERNMENT HOSPITAL . . . . . . . AAny other place?GOVT. HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . BGOVERNMENT DISPENSARY . . . . . CPROBE TO IDENTIFY EACH TYPE OF SOURCE ANDCIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE CODE(S). OTHER PUBLIC D(SPECIFY)IF UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF HOSPITAL, HEALTH CENTERVCT CENTER, OR CLINIC IS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE MEDICAL, PRIVATE MEDICAL SECTORWRITE THE NAME OF THE PLACE.MISSIONARY/CHURCH HOSP./CLINICEFPAK HEALTH CENTRE/CLINIC . . . FPRIVATE HOSPITAL/CLINIC . . . . . G(NAME OF PLACE(S)) VCT CENTRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HNURSING/MATERNITY HOMES . . . IBLOOD TRANSFUSION SERVICES JOTHER PRIVATEMEDICALK(SPECIFY)OTHER SOURCETRADITIONAL HEALER . . . . . . . . . LSHOP/PHARMACY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MFRIENDS OR RELATIVES . . . . . . . NOTHER(SPECIFY)X719H Wh<strong>en</strong> you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 719B/719C/719D), did YES, INFORMED ALL PARTNERS . . . 1you inform the person(s) with whom you were having sex? NO, INFORMED NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2INFORMED SOME NOT ALL . . . . . . . 3DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER . . . . . . . 4 801719I Wh<strong>en</strong> you had (PROBLEM(S) FROM 719B/719C/719D), did YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1you do anything to avoid infecting your sexual partners(s) NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 801DID NOT HAVE A PARTNER . . . . . . . 3 801719J What did you do to avoid infecting your partner(s) ? Did YES NOyou:Use medicine? USE MEDICINE . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Stop having sex? STOP SEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2Use a condom wh<strong>en</strong> having sex? USE CONDOM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2428 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E


SECTION 8. OTHER HEALTH ISSUESNO. QUESTIONS AND FILTERS CODING CATEGORIES SKIP801 Have you ever heard of an illness called tuberculosis or TB? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 805802 How does tuberculosis spread from one person to another? THROUGH THE AIR WHENCOUGHING OR SNEEZING . . . . . . . APROBE: Any other ways? THROUGH SHARING UTENSILS . . . . . BTHROUGH TOUCHING A PERSONRECORD ALL MENTIONED.WITH TB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CTHROUGH FOOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DTHROUGH SEXUAL CONTACT . . . . . ETHROUGH MOSQUITO BITES . . . . . . . FOTHERX(SPECIFY)DON’T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z803 Can tuberculosis be cured? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8804 If a member of your family got tuberculosis, would you want it YES, REMAIN A SECRET . . . . . . . . . 1to remain a secret or not? NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW/NOT SURE/DEPENDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8805 Some m<strong>en</strong> are circumcised. Are you circumcised? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2DON'T KNOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8810 Do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke cigarettes? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 812811 In the last 24 hours, how many cigarettes did you smoke?CIGARETTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .812 Do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke or use any other type of tobacco? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 814813 What (other) type of tobacco do you curr<strong>en</strong>tly smoke or use? PIPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ACHEWING TOBACCO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BRECORD ALL MENTIONED. SNUFF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COTHER(SPECIFY)X814 Are you covered by any health insurance? YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 820815 What type of health insurance? MUTUAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION/COMMUNITY BASED HEALTHRECORD ALL MENTIONED. INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AHEALTH INSURANCE THROUGHEMPLOYER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BSOCIAL SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COTHER PRIVATELY PURCHASEDCOMMERCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE. DOTHERX(SPECIFY)820 RECORD THE TIME.HOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MINUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .App<strong>en</strong>dix E | 429


INTERVIEWER'S OBSERVATIONSTO BE FILLED IN AFTER COMPLETING INTERVIEWCOMMENTS ABOUT RESPONDENT:COMMENTS ON SPECIFIC QUESTIONS:ANY OTHER COMMENTS:SUPERVISOR'S OBSERVATIONSNAME OF SUPERVISOR:DATE:EDITOR'S OBSERVATIONSNAME OF EDITOR:DATE:430 | App<strong>en</strong>dix E

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!