HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
DYNASTIC HISTORY 241the death of his father and lived until 965; he may have been bornas early as 885. By the time this genealogy was composed, between951 and 959, 110 Arnulf was already an old man; his son Baldwinruled the south of Flanders during this period. 111 Thus a successionwas in the offing, a time of shift and change.Compiègne was not in Flanders; indeed, it was a favored Carolingianresidence under Charles the Bald, 112 and Charles the Simple was stillmaking donations. 113 Arnulf pursued a complicated policy in relationto Charles’s son and long-term successor, Louis IV, supporting himinitially up until 939 and then rebelling against him. Toward theend of his life, possibly after this genealogy was written, he was againconciliatory. 114 For the monks at Compiègne, whose founders wereintermittently at odds with this other desirable patron, none of whosekin lay buried at Compiègne, it might well have been a priority tostress Arnulf’s earlier benefactions and offer the prayers of the monksfor him and his son in the hopes that such benefactions might continue.All in all, then, family relationships as laid out by Witger servethe needs of Compiègne. But the single autograph manuscript ofWitger’s genealogy is preserved at Saint-Bertin. 115 Saint-Bertin alsohad a stake in the counts; its presence may relate to that monastery’scareful collection of historical materials and also to the burial thereof members of the comital family. 116In the next series of Flemish genealogies, political concerns swirlmuch closer to the surface than purely monastic concerns, and, notsurprisingly, the second and third generations of comital genealogieswere more widely disseminated, perhaps in some kind of quasi-officialway. The genealogy composed during the lifetime of Robert II (†1111)at Saint-Bertin was preserved in five manuscripts (one now lost) and110Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 302 n. 1; but see van Caenegem(1973), 92 n. 8 who notes that Grierson has suggested 959–60, a date acceptedalso by Genicot (1975), 19, while Werner (1967), 7:46 says 962.111Nicholas (1992), 42.112McKitterick (1983), 751–987, 193, 214; for the school, see 214.113McKitterick (1983), 333.114McKitterick (1983), 251.115Genealogiae comitum Flandriae (1851), 302.116Baldwin II was buried at St. Peter’s in Ghent; Elftrude refused to have himburied at Saint-Bertin, because the monks would not let her be buried there aswell (Nicholas [1992], 20). Baldwin III was buried at Saint-Bertin, and Witger(Genealogiae comitum Flandriae [1851], 303) notes that Arnulf ’s brother Adalulf was aswell.
242 LEAH SHOPKOWtwo versions, with several continuations. 117 The important politicalissue at the end of the earliest versions was the succession of RobertI “the Frisian” to Flanders; while the majority version is neutral, atleast one version takes a dim view of Robert’s character and rights.While this genealogy may seem to affirm the continuity of the family(Robert I was usurping Flanders from his nephew), it does documenta political change important to the southern lords (includingthe people of Saint-Omer), who, according to Flandria generosa, hadnot supported Robert. That this tradition should be alive at Saint-Bertin, where Robert’s defeated rival was buried, is hardly surprising.118 The continuations of this genealogy similarly appear at timesof crisis: one hand chronicles the succession crisis of 1127–28; anotherpicks up until the succession of Baldwin V of Hainaut (Baldwin VIIIof Flanders) upon the death of Philip of Alsace; a third carries onthrough the sad aftermath of Bouvines; while another later hand carrieson to the succession of Guy after the long reigns of BaldwinXI’s daughters. In other words, the hands change at political juncturesin the history of Flanders. These genealogies and their continuationsand reworkings do not always seem to represent the politicalinterests of the family. Lambert of Saint-Omer stresses Robert II’s“tyranny” toward the clergy. The story ends happily, more or less,with the count penitent (although compelled by the fear of an interdict)and then quickly dead.This history, then, does not seem to arise from the comital family’ssense of itself. Although the lineage of the counts of Flanderswas a true blood lineage (albeit sometimes through the female line)—not always the case in other places—the genealogies take into theirstride the abrupt changes of family branch that punctuated Flemishhistory. What concerned them, when they gave more than the baresuccession, was political events and connections. The counts of Flanderswere extremely effective rulers; their administration was more complexand professional than the French administration of the period,for example. To a great degree, the history of their family was thehistory of Flanders. In short, in this case, the genealogies are a kindof institutional history.117Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 305–06, with continuations 306–08.118Nicholas (1992), 52; Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 322.
- Page 199 and 200: 190 NORBERT KERSKENat Sázava; and,
- Page 201 and 202: 192 NORBERT KERSKENhistoriography o
- Page 203 and 204: 194 NORBERT KERSKENnine books can b
- Page 205 and 206: 196 NORBERT KERSKENMedieval Norway
- Page 207 and 208: 198 NORBERT KERSKENand worked, duri
- Page 209 and 210: 200 NORBERT KERSKENplanis verbis in
- Page 211 and 212: 202 NORBERT KERSKENto the invasion
- Page 213 and 214: 204 NORBERT KERSKENwhich made a con
- Page 215 and 216: 206 NORBERT KERSKENindebted to Vinc
- Page 217 and 218: 208 NORBERT KERSKENof various polit
- Page 219 and 220: 210 NORBERT KERSKENto the accession
- Page 221 and 222: 212 NORBERT KERSKENAt the turn of t
- Page 223 and 224: 214 NORBERT KERSKENHumanistic natio
- Page 225 and 226: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 227 and 228: 218 LEAH SHOPKOWAnother explanation
- Page 229 and 230: 220 LEAH SHOPKOWThus, when someone
- Page 231 and 232: 222 LEAH SHOPKOWThe genesis of the
- Page 233 and 234: 224 LEAH SHOPKOWThe Distribution of
- Page 235 and 236: 226 LEAH SHOPKOWnot very common unt
- Page 237 and 238: 228 LEAH SHOPKOW“a history withou
- Page 239 and 240: 230 LEAH SHOPKOWchoose another hist
- Page 241 and 242: 232 LEAH SHOPKOWDynastic history al
- Page 243 and 244: 234 LEAH SHOPKOWThe Author-Subject
- Page 245 and 246: 236 LEAH SHOPKOWaddresses Henry II,
- Page 247 and 248: 238 LEAH SHOPKOWconsistent with med
- Page 249: 240 LEAH SHOPKOWdaughter of Charles
- Page 253 and 254: 244 LEAH SHOPKOWfor its patrimony a
- Page 255 and 256: 246 LEAH SHOPKOWwork, the Assises d
- Page 257 and 258: 248 LEAH SHOPKOWthe family chose to
- Page 259 and 260: 250 PETER AINSWORTHis one of the fi
- Page 261 and 262: 252 PETER AINSWORTHEarly Eyewitness
- Page 263 and 264: 254 PETER AINSWORTHenliven his narr
- Page 265 and 266: 256 PETER AINSWORTHAtant es vus ces
- Page 267 and 268: 258 PETER AINSWORTHCrusader Histori
- Page 269 and 270: 260 PETER AINSWORTHAmbroise’s Est
- Page 271 and 272: 262 PETER AINSWORTHof which he had
- Page 273 and 274: 264 PETER AINSWORTHas the romance-l
- Page 275 and 276: 266 PETER AINSWORTHat Les Estinnes-
- Page 277 and 278: 268 PETER AINSWORTHmust have disapp
- Page 279 and 280: 270 PETER AINSWORTHalso—and more
- Page 281 and 282: 272 PETER AINSWORTHGiven that the k
- Page 283 and 284: 274 PETER AINSWORTHwhose likeness h
- Page 285 and 286: 276 PETER AINSWORTHhonest ‘generi
- Page 287 and 288: 278 BERT ROESTThis chapter deals wi
- Page 289 and 290: 280 BERT ROESTMonastic chronicles a
- Page 291 and 292: 282 BERT ROESTwider salvation-histo
- Page 293 and 294: 284 BERT ROESTConstance Proksch eve
- Page 295 and 296: 286 BERT ROESTcatalogues. Normally,
- Page 297 and 298: 288 BERT ROESTIII. Mendicant Histor
- Page 299 and 300: 290 BERT ROESTIII.1Franciscan and D
DYNASTIC HISTORY 241the death of his father and lived until 965; he may have been bornas early as 885. By the time this genealogy was composed, between951 and 959, 110 Arnulf was already an old man; his son Baldwinruled the south of Flanders during this period. 111 Thus a successionwas in the offing, a time of shift and change.Compiègne was not in Flanders; indeed, it was a favored Carolingianresidence under Charles the Bald, 112 and Charles the Simple was stillmaking donations. 113 Arnulf pursued a complicated policy in relationto Charles’s son and long-term successor, Louis IV, supporting himinitially up until 939 and then rebelling against him. Toward theend of his life, possibly after this genealogy was written, he was againconciliatory. 114 For the monks at Compiègne, whose founders wereintermittently at odds with this other desirable patron, none of whosekin lay buried at Compiègne, it might well have been a priority tostress Arnulf’s earlier benefactions and offer the prayers of the monksfor him and his son in the hopes that such benefactions might continue.All in all, then, family relationships as laid out by Witger servethe needs of Compiègne. But the single autograph manuscript ofWitger’s genealogy is preserved at Saint-Bertin. 115 Saint-Bertin alsohad a stake in the counts; its presence may relate to that monastery’scareful collection of historical materials and also to the burial thereof members of the comital family. 116In the next series of Flemish genealogies, political concerns swirlmuch closer to the surface than purely monastic concerns, and, notsurprisingly, the second and third generations of comital genealogieswere more widely disseminated, perhaps in some kind of quasi-officialway. The genealogy composed during the lifetime of Robert II (†1111)at Saint-Bertin was preserved in five manuscripts (one now lost) and110Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 302 n. 1; but see van Caenegem(1973), 92 n. 8 who notes that Grierson has suggested 959–60, a date acceptedalso by Genicot (1975), 19, while Werner (1967), 7:46 says 962.111Nicholas (1992), 42.112McKitterick (1983), 751–987, 193, 214; for the school, see 214.113McKitterick (1983), 333.114McKitterick (1983), 251.115Genealogiae comitum Flandriae (1851), 302.116Baldwin II was buried at St. Peter’s in Ghent; Elftrude refused to have himburied at Saint-Bertin, because the monks would not let her be buried there aswell (Nicholas [1992], 20). Baldwin III was buried at Saint-Bertin, and Witger(Genealogiae comitum Flandriae [1851], 303) notes that Arnulf ’s brother Adalulf was aswell.