HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor

HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor

juliano.multiculturas.com
from juliano.multiculturas.com More from this publisher
21.07.2015 Views

DYNASTIC HISTORY 241the death of his father and lived until 965; he may have been bornas early as 885. By the time this genealogy was composed, between951 and 959, 110 Arnulf was already an old man; his son Baldwinruled the south of Flanders during this period. 111 Thus a successionwas in the offing, a time of shift and change.Compiègne was not in Flanders; indeed, it was a favored Carolingianresidence under Charles the Bald, 112 and Charles the Simple was stillmaking donations. 113 Arnulf pursued a complicated policy in relationto Charles’s son and long-term successor, Louis IV, supporting himinitially up until 939 and then rebelling against him. Toward theend of his life, possibly after this genealogy was written, he was againconciliatory. 114 For the monks at Compiègne, whose founders wereintermittently at odds with this other desirable patron, none of whosekin lay buried at Compiègne, it might well have been a priority tostress Arnulf’s earlier benefactions and offer the prayers of the monksfor him and his son in the hopes that such benefactions might continue.All in all, then, family relationships as laid out by Witger servethe needs of Compiègne. But the single autograph manuscript ofWitger’s genealogy is preserved at Saint-Bertin. 115 Saint-Bertin alsohad a stake in the counts; its presence may relate to that monastery’scareful collection of historical materials and also to the burial thereof members of the comital family. 116In the next series of Flemish genealogies, political concerns swirlmuch closer to the surface than purely monastic concerns, and, notsurprisingly, the second and third generations of comital genealogieswere more widely disseminated, perhaps in some kind of quasi-officialway. The genealogy composed during the lifetime of Robert II (†1111)at Saint-Bertin was preserved in five manuscripts (one now lost) and110Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 302 n. 1; but see van Caenegem(1973), 92 n. 8 who notes that Grierson has suggested 959–60, a date acceptedalso by Genicot (1975), 19, while Werner (1967), 7:46 says 962.111Nicholas (1992), 42.112McKitterick (1983), 751–987, 193, 214; for the school, see 214.113McKitterick (1983), 333.114McKitterick (1983), 251.115Genealogiae comitum Flandriae (1851), 302.116Baldwin II was buried at St. Peter’s in Ghent; Elftrude refused to have himburied at Saint-Bertin, because the monks would not let her be buried there aswell (Nicholas [1992], 20). Baldwin III was buried at Saint-Bertin, and Witger(Genealogiae comitum Flandriae [1851], 303) notes that Arnulf ’s brother Adalulf was aswell.

242 LEAH SHOPKOWtwo versions, with several continuations. 117 The important politicalissue at the end of the earliest versions was the succession of RobertI “the Frisian” to Flanders; while the majority version is neutral, atleast one version takes a dim view of Robert’s character and rights.While this genealogy may seem to affirm the continuity of the family(Robert I was usurping Flanders from his nephew), it does documenta political change important to the southern lords (includingthe people of Saint-Omer), who, according to Flandria generosa, hadnot supported Robert. That this tradition should be alive at Saint-Bertin, where Robert’s defeated rival was buried, is hardly surprising.118 The continuations of this genealogy similarly appear at timesof crisis: one hand chronicles the succession crisis of 1127–28; anotherpicks up until the succession of Baldwin V of Hainaut (Baldwin VIIIof Flanders) upon the death of Philip of Alsace; a third carries onthrough the sad aftermath of Bouvines; while another later hand carrieson to the succession of Guy after the long reigns of BaldwinXI’s daughters. In other words, the hands change at political juncturesin the history of Flanders. These genealogies and their continuationsand reworkings do not always seem to represent the politicalinterests of the family. Lambert of Saint-Omer stresses Robert II’s“tyranny” toward the clergy. The story ends happily, more or less,with the count penitent (although compelled by the fear of an interdict)and then quickly dead.This history, then, does not seem to arise from the comital family’ssense of itself. Although the lineage of the counts of Flanderswas a true blood lineage (albeit sometimes through the female line)—not always the case in other places—the genealogies take into theirstride the abrupt changes of family branch that punctuated Flemishhistory. What concerned them, when they gave more than the baresuccession, was political events and connections. The counts of Flanderswere extremely effective rulers; their administration was more complexand professional than the French administration of the period,for example. To a great degree, the history of their family was thehistory of Flanders. In short, in this case, the genealogies are a kindof institutional history.117Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 305–06, with continuations 306–08.118Nicholas (1992), 52; Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 322.

DYNASTIC HISTORY 241the death of his father and lived until 965; he may have been bornas early as 885. By the time this genealogy was composed, between951 and 959, 110 Arnulf was already an old man; his son Baldwinruled the south of Flanders during this period. 111 Thus a successionwas in the offing, a time of shift and change.Compiègne was not in Flanders; indeed, it was a favored Carolingianresidence under Charles the Bald, 112 and Charles the Simple was stillmaking donations. 113 Arnulf pursued a complicated policy in relationto Charles’s son and long-term successor, Louis IV, supporting himinitially up until 939 and then rebelling against him. Toward theend of his life, possibly after this genealogy was written, he was againconciliatory. 114 For the monks at Compiègne, whose founders wereintermittently at odds with this other desirable patron, none of whosekin lay buried at Compiègne, it might well have been a priority tostress Arnulf’s earlier benefactions and offer the prayers of the monksfor him and his son in the hopes that such benefactions might continue.All in all, then, family relationships as laid out by Witger servethe needs of Compiègne. But the single autograph manuscript ofWitger’s genealogy is preserved at Saint-Bertin. 115 Saint-Bertin alsohad a stake in the counts; its presence may relate to that monastery’scareful collection of historical materials and also to the burial thereof members of the comital family. 116In the next series of Flemish genealogies, political concerns swirlmuch closer to the surface than purely monastic concerns, and, notsurprisingly, the second and third generations of comital genealogieswere more widely disseminated, perhaps in some kind of quasi-officialway. The genealogy composed during the lifetime of Robert II (†1111)at Saint-Bertin was preserved in five manuscripts (one now lost) and110Genealogiae comitum Flandriae, ed. Bethmann, 302 n. 1; but see van Caenegem(1973), 92 n. 8 who notes that Grierson has suggested 959–60, a date acceptedalso by Genicot (1975), 19, while Werner (1967), 7:46 says 962.111Nicholas (1992), 42.112McKitterick (1983), 751–987, 193, 214; for the school, see 214.113McKitterick (1983), 333.114McKitterick (1983), 251.115Genealogiae comitum Flandriae (1851), 302.116Baldwin II was buried at St. Peter’s in Ghent; Elftrude refused to have himburied at Saint-Bertin, because the monks would not let her be buried there aswell (Nicholas [1992], 20). Baldwin III was buried at Saint-Bertin, and Witger(Genealogiae comitum Flandriae [1851], 303) notes that Arnulf ’s brother Adalulf was aswell.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!