HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
DYNASTIC HISTORY 237were written at institutions that had close links to the subject and/orby individuals who had close links to the subject. 94Two sorts of authors seem to emerge for dynastic histories, then:the first an individual closely associated in a personal way with thefamily commemorated; the second, the writer at an institution closelyassociated with the family regime. 95 Both sorts of authorship raisequestions about who determined the content of the histories andwhether these histories represent the memories of their subjects, a“memory” “retrieved” from documents or simply made up, or somecombination of the two.Because dynastic histories often present themselves as memories,it is easy to take that presentation at face value. I do not wish toargue here that the elite (or indeed the peasants) of medieval societyhad no memories of their own pasts. Other scholars have arguedconvincingly that they did and even that the function of preservingthese kinds of memories was entrusted to some layperson, sometimeslearned, sometimes a family member. 96 What I want to argue hereis something different, that many of the surviving dynastic historieswe have are not simple transfers of “memory” from the minds ofthe collectivity to the page but are, instead, mediated, often by membersof the clergy but certainly by a learned person, and not alwaysfor the ends or at the behest of the family in question. Certainlyparts of these traditions might well slip into historical writingunchanged—the most prominent examples being Lambert of Wattrelosand Lambert of Saint-Omer’s reports on their own families. 97 Inother cases, we may talk about mediation, as in the case of theAnglo-Saxon royal genealogies. These may preserve an account ofdescent from a Germanic god, presumably the oral portion of thegenealogy, and insert the god’s ancestors. The result is to emphasizethat “the god” was human and not, in fact, a god; indeed hemight be descended from Noah. 98 This treatment of pagan gods is94For example, Otto I’s biographer, Hrosvita of Gandersheim, wrote at an institutionwhose abbess was an imperial relative.95Althoff (1988), esp. 74–75; Johanek (1992), 201–02.96See, for example, Moisl (1981); van Houts (1999), Geary (1994), Johanek (1992),201.97Although it is worth noting that both men, as historians themselves, had encountereddynastic-genealogical integrated into history already—it did not appear in theirwork as some kind of spontaneous invention.98Genicot (1975), 39.
238 LEAH SHOPKOWconsistent with medieval learned treatments of the Roman gods ofantiquity. 99 We may also talk about the incorporation of materialsthat may not have been memory but which were widespread, suchas the use of epic, for example, the way epic deeds are set into theGesta consulum Andegavorum’s account of Geoffrey Grisegonelle. 100 Atthe other extreme, in some cases the contents of these histories maynot have resided in the brain of any person before they took shapein the mind of the writer, either under the influence of a researchedhistorical record or through invention. 101It can, of course, be very difficult to tell precisely from where thecontents of these histories come. To give one example, scholars havebeen arguing for some time about whether Dudo of Saint-Quentin’smaterial was composed of family memories passed to the historianby his patrons or whether it contains mostly constructions by thehistorian. 102 Clearly, however, some genealogies and dynastic historiesdrew upon the author’s research. This seems to have been thecase with the Welf genealogies and was certainly the case with theGrandes chroniques de France. Gislebert of Mons, although an eyewitness,also drew upon the charter record. Lambert of Ardres certainlyhad at least read some historical texts—Noble Flanders at the veryleast—and perhaps charters as well. Research in this sense mustinclude orally circulating material as well. When the author of theGesta consulum Andegavorum included quasi-epic materials on the reignof Geoffrey Grisegonelle, he might have gotten that material frommembers of the family, but he might equally well have encounteredthem in some other oral form.Even if we suppose that the core of the dynastic history containednothing but the memories of the family, someone either within thefamily or within its circle of power would have to have decided towrite this material down. We have to assume that for most members99Veyne (1988).100Halphen and Poupardin, Chroniques des comtes d’Anjou et des seigneurs d’Amboise,37 ff. and 38 n. 1. Still, this “epic” story is recounted in a text liberally strewnwith classical reminiscences (41 n. 1).101See Althoff (1988), for a conjectural reconstruction of the genesis of severalnoble genealogies through the labors of learned compilers.102This argument is tied into the larger question of whether the Normans werestill “Scandinavian” in their institutions. For the argument that they were and thatDudo’s work contains extensive Nordic memories, see Searle (1984); van Houts(1984); for the argument that Dudo based his work on Latin examples, particularlyVergil’s Aeneid, see Shopkow (1997), 150; Bates (1982), 15 ff.; Albu (1994), 111–18.
- Page 195 and 196: 186 NORBERT KERSKENpoint of departu
- Page 197 and 198: 188 NORBERT KERSKENof which (1110/1
- Page 199 and 200: 190 NORBERT KERSKENat Sázava; and,
- Page 201 and 202: 192 NORBERT KERSKENhistoriography o
- Page 203 and 204: 194 NORBERT KERSKENnine books can b
- Page 205 and 206: 196 NORBERT KERSKENMedieval Norway
- Page 207 and 208: 198 NORBERT KERSKENand worked, duri
- Page 209 and 210: 200 NORBERT KERSKENplanis verbis in
- Page 211 and 212: 202 NORBERT KERSKENto the invasion
- Page 213 and 214: 204 NORBERT KERSKENwhich made a con
- Page 215 and 216: 206 NORBERT KERSKENindebted to Vinc
- Page 217 and 218: 208 NORBERT KERSKENof various polit
- Page 219 and 220: 210 NORBERT KERSKENto the accession
- Page 221 and 222: 212 NORBERT KERSKENAt the turn of t
- Page 223 and 224: 214 NORBERT KERSKENHumanistic natio
- Page 225 and 226: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 227 and 228: 218 LEAH SHOPKOWAnother explanation
- Page 229 and 230: 220 LEAH SHOPKOWThus, when someone
- Page 231 and 232: 222 LEAH SHOPKOWThe genesis of the
- Page 233 and 234: 224 LEAH SHOPKOWThe Distribution of
- Page 235 and 236: 226 LEAH SHOPKOWnot very common unt
- Page 237 and 238: 228 LEAH SHOPKOW“a history withou
- Page 239 and 240: 230 LEAH SHOPKOWchoose another hist
- Page 241 and 242: 232 LEAH SHOPKOWDynastic history al
- Page 243 and 244: 234 LEAH SHOPKOWThe Author-Subject
- Page 245: 236 LEAH SHOPKOWaddresses Henry II,
- Page 249 and 250: 240 LEAH SHOPKOWdaughter of Charles
- Page 251 and 252: 242 LEAH SHOPKOWtwo versions, with
- Page 253 and 254: 244 LEAH SHOPKOWfor its patrimony a
- Page 255 and 256: 246 LEAH SHOPKOWwork, the Assises d
- Page 257 and 258: 248 LEAH SHOPKOWthe family chose to
- Page 259 and 260: 250 PETER AINSWORTHis one of the fi
- Page 261 and 262: 252 PETER AINSWORTHEarly Eyewitness
- Page 263 and 264: 254 PETER AINSWORTHenliven his narr
- Page 265 and 266: 256 PETER AINSWORTHAtant es vus ces
- Page 267 and 268: 258 PETER AINSWORTHCrusader Histori
- Page 269 and 270: 260 PETER AINSWORTHAmbroise’s Est
- Page 271 and 272: 262 PETER AINSWORTHof which he had
- Page 273 and 274: 264 PETER AINSWORTHas the romance-l
- Page 275 and 276: 266 PETER AINSWORTHat Les Estinnes-
- Page 277 and 278: 268 PETER AINSWORTHmust have disapp
- Page 279 and 280: 270 PETER AINSWORTHalso—and more
- Page 281 and 282: 272 PETER AINSWORTHGiven that the k
- Page 283 and 284: 274 PETER AINSWORTHwhose likeness h
- Page 285 and 286: 276 PETER AINSWORTHhonest ‘generi
- Page 287 and 288: 278 BERT ROESTThis chapter deals wi
- Page 289 and 290: 280 BERT ROESTMonastic chronicles a
- Page 291 and 292: 282 BERT ROESTwider salvation-histo
- Page 293 and 294: 284 BERT ROESTConstance Proksch eve
- Page 295 and 296: 286 BERT ROESTcatalogues. Normally,
238 LEAH SHOPKOWconsistent with medieval learned treatments of the Roman gods ofantiquity. 99 We may also talk about the incorporation of materialsthat may not have been memory but which were widespread, suchas the use of epic, for example, the way epic deeds are set into theGesta consulum Andegavorum’s account of Geoffrey Grisegonelle. 100 Atthe other extreme, in some cases the contents of these histories maynot have resided in the brain of any person before they took shapein the mind of the writer, either under the influence of a researchedhistorical record or through invention. 101It can, of course, be very difficult to tell precisely from where thecontents of these histories come. To give one example, scholars havebeen arguing for some time about whether Dudo of Saint-Quentin’smaterial was composed of family memories passed to the historianby his patrons or whether it contains mostly constructions by thehistorian. 102 Clearly, however, some genealogies and dynastic historiesdrew upon the author’s research. This seems to have been thecase with the Welf genealogies and was certainly the case with theGrandes chroniques de France. Gislebert of Mons, although an eyewitness,also drew upon the charter record. Lambert of Ardres certainlyhad at least read some historical texts—Noble Flanders at the veryleast—and perhaps charters as well. Research in this sense mustinclude orally circulating material as well. When the author of theGesta consulum Andegavorum included quasi-epic materials on the reignof Geoffrey Grisegonelle, he might have gotten that material frommembers of the family, but he might equally well have encounteredthem in some other oral form.Even if we suppose that the core of the dynastic history containednothing but the memories of the family, someone either within thefamily or within its circle of power would have to have decided towrite this material down. We have to assume that for most members99Veyne (1988).100Halphen and Poupardin, Chroniques des comtes d’Anjou et des seigneurs d’Amboise,37 ff. and 38 n. 1. Still, this “epic” story is recounted in a text liberally strewnwith classical reminiscences (41 n. 1).101See Althoff (1988), for a conjectural reconstruction of the genesis of severalnoble genealogies through the labors of learned compilers.102This argument is tied into the larger question of whether the Normans werestill “Scandinavian” in their institutions. For the argument that they were and thatDudo’s work contains extensive Nordic memories, see Searle (1984); van Houts(1984); for the argument that Dudo based his work on Latin examples, particularlyVergil’s Aeneid, see Shopkow (1997), 150; Bates (1982), 15 ff.; Albu (1994), 111–18.