HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
INTRODUCTION 9In 1980, Bernard Guenée published Histoire et culture historique dansl’Occident médiévale. In 1985, Franz Josef Schmale published Funktionund Formen mittelalterlicher Geschichtsschreibung: eine Einfuhrung. The twobooks are quite similar in many ways. In each book, the author considersthe whole range of medieval historiography in chapters on theplace of history in medieval knowledge, the way the author learnedabout the past, the ways time was marked, the relationship to religiouswriting, and the nature of historical truth, function, and audience.By taking a topical approach to the historical texts, rather thanone based on genre or chronology, Guenée and Schmale are ableto examine much more clearly the place of history-writing in medievalintellectual life, and ways that medieval historians thought about theirsubject matter.Other than these comprehensive works, there have been numerousstudies on more focused groups of historical texts. Generallythese studies center on a particular geographic area in one particularperiod, or even on one text, and to look at the factors (political,personal, institutional, etc.) that went into the texts’ construction.National surveys have appeared for England, Italy, and Spain. 31 Fivevolumes devoted to individual genres of texts have appeared in theseries Typologie des Sources du Moyen Age occidental, on early medievalannals, universal chronicles, hagiographical manuscripts, gesta episcoporumet abbatum, and local and regional chronicles. 32 As noted above,all of these different types of categories are modern conceptions createdfor the purpose of studying a group of texts, rather than necessarilycorresponding to what medieval historians were doing. 33ConclusionsIt is much easier to write an analysis of an individual text than toattempt to survey medieval history-writing as a whole. As the ideathat medieval historians did not think in terms of genre has taken31England: Gransden (1974); Spain: Dübler (1943) and Linehan (1993); Italy:Zanella (1984).32McCormick (1975); Krueger (1976); Philippart (1977); Sot (1981); van Houts(1995).33Cf. Roest (1999), 48–49.
10 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNIShold, scholars have shied away from writing surveys of medieval historiography,instead focusing on more theoretical aspects of historywriting. The purpose of the present volume is to attempt to fill thatvoid, by introducing the whole variety of medieval historical texts,as well as the ways that modern scholars have approached them.Since genres, either medieval or modern, are now held in suchdisrepute, this book takes as an organizational framework the subjectmatter of the texts: whose pasts were being written down in theMiddle Ages. In some cases, the texts discussed in a chapter willrepresent only one or two of the traditional historiographical genres,but in other cases many different sorts of texts might be considered,for example in the chapter by Joaquin Pizarro. By considering thetexts in this way, we can do two things at once. First, we can seewhich entities were considered worthy of having their history writtendown (and, by extension, which were not) at various periods. Second,we can examine how the histories of these entities were written,which conventions and genres were considered suitable for them,and thus ultimately understand something about historical genres aswell. At certain points we can see that a genre has developed, withassumptions and rules, and based on a recognized model. 34Rather than simply understanding the place of history in medievalintellectual culture, by looking at the different types of subject mattermemorialized in these texts, we reach a broader understandingof what mattered at different times and in different contexts, of whatsorts of individuals, groups, and sets of events were considered worthyof having their history recorded. The book is divided into twoparts, early and later Middle Ages. For the early period, there arefour chapters, whereas for the later period there are seven. This ispartly because many more texts survive from the later period, andin order to give greater coverage to them, more chapters were deemednecessary. But a look at the chapter titles also indicates the widerarray of subject matter that was covered by history in the laterperiod.For the early Middle Ages, historiographical texts can be dividedinto four main subject areas. Universal history was very popular since34Allen (in this volume) notes this for universal history; Pizarro (in this volume)for the origo gentis, which, however, only exists as a conscious genre after the tenthcentury.
- Page 1 and 2: HISTORIOGRAPHYIN THE MIDDLE AGESDEB
- Page 3 and 4: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 5 and 6: This book is printed on acid-free p
- Page 7 and 8: viCONTENTS11. Biography 1000-1350 .
- Page 9 and 10: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 11 and 12: 2 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNISMuch o
- Page 13 and 14: 4 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNISbetter
- Page 15 and 16: 6 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNISThe ch
- Page 17: 8 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNIScritic
- Page 21 and 22: 12 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNISnow i
- Page 23 and 24: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 25 and 26: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 27 and 28: 18 MICHAEL I. ALLENone, emphasized
- Page 29 and 30: 20 MICHAEL I. ALLENFrom the flux of
- Page 31 and 32: 22 MICHAEL I. ALLENuntil and beyond
- Page 33 and 34: 24 MICHAEL I. ALLENreverse, their l
- Page 35 and 36: 26 MICHAEL I. ALLENwith a new cosmi
- Page 37 and 38: 28 MICHAEL I. ALLENcoincidence of A
- Page 39 and 40: 30 MICHAEL I. ALLENAbraham and God
- Page 41 and 42: 32 MICHAEL I. ALLENAugustine unders
- Page 43 and 44: 34 MICHAEL I. ALLENeffort, Bede mea
- Page 45 and 46: 36 MICHAEL I. ALLENchronology, and
- Page 47 and 48: 38 MICHAEL I. ALLENarticulate his p
- Page 49 and 50: 40 MICHAEL I. ALLENiconoclast Claud
- Page 51 and 52: 42 MICHAEL I. ALLENextent that they
- Page 53 and 54: 44 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROself-a
- Page 55 and 56: 46 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROritual
- Page 57 and 58: 48 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROoffici
- Page 59 and 60: 50 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROlong-l
- Page 61 and 62: 52 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROGregor
- Page 63 and 64: 54 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROrange
- Page 65 and 66: 56 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROTestam
- Page 67 and 68: 58 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROthe pr
10 DEBORAH MAUSKOPF DELIYANNIShold, scholars have shied away from writing surveys of medieval historiography,instead focusing on more theoretical aspects of historywriting. The purpose of the present volume is to attempt to fill thatvoid, by introducing the whole variety of medieval historical texts,as well as the ways that modern scholars have approached them.Since genres, either medieval or modern, are now held in suchdisrepute, this book takes as an organizational framework the subjectmatter of the texts: whose pasts were being written down in theMiddle Ages. In some cases, the texts discussed in a chapter willrepresent only one or two of the traditional historiographical genres,but in other cases many different sorts of texts might be considered,for example in the chapter by Joaquin Pizarro. By considering thetexts in this way, we can do two things at once. First, we can seewhich entities were considered worthy of having their history writtendown (and, by extension, which were not) at various periods. Second,we can examine how the histories of these entities were written,which conventions and genres were considered suitable for them,and thus ultimately understand something about historical genres aswell. At certain points we can see that a genre has developed, withassumptions and rules, and based on a recognized model. 34Rather than simply understanding the place of history in medievalintellectual culture, by looking at the different types of subject mattermemorialized in these texts, we reach a broader understandingof what mattered at different times and in different contexts, of whatsorts of individuals, groups, and sets of events were considered worthyof having their history recorded. The book is divided into twoparts, early and later Middle Ages. For the early period, there arefour chapters, whereas for the later period there are seven. This ispartly because many more texts survive from the later period, andin order to give greater coverage to them, more chapters were deemednecessary. But a look at the chapter titles also indicates the widerarray of subject matter that was covered by history in the laterperiod.For the early Middle Ages, historiographical texts can be dividedinto four main subject areas. Universal history was very popular since34Allen (in this volume) notes this for universal history; Pizarro (in this volume)for the origo gentis, which, however, only exists as a conscious genre after the tenthcentury.