HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
CHRISTIAN BIOGRAPHY: FOUNDATION TO MATURITY 145kings avoided visiting the city lest they give the impression that theywere subservient to the cult and its episcopal administrators.Benedict of NursiaKnowingly ignorant and wisely unlearned. (Gregory the Great, Dialogues)It would be difficult to imagine Gregory the Great (ca. 540–604)composing his life of Saint Benedict in Book II of his Dialogues withoutthe earlier models of Sulpicius’s Martin and Gregory of Tour’sLife of the Fathers. 73 Yet, although Pope Gregory and Gregory of Toursare near contemporaries and the influence of Sulpicius’s Martin isapparent in Gregory’s hagiographies—even borrowing miracles fromGregory of Tours for his life of Saint Benedict—Gregory’s life ofSaint Benedict, marks another shift in the representation of the sacred.Gregory’s incorporation of dialogue is a narrative innovation inChristian biography. His use of the dialogue is indebted to two traditions:the first is the polarized court room inquisitions of the Actsof the Martyrs presented in the commentarius; the second is the classicalmodel, best exemplified by Plato. The personae of Gregory asthe benevolent teacher and Peter as the zealous, inquisitive studentcreate a dramatic setting that provides an audience with multipleframes of reference: Benedict and all the individuals he interactswith, as well as Gregory and Peter. The audience receives the storyof Benedict through the conversation of Gregory and Peter. Theircommentary on the nature of Benedict’s miracles, the presence ofgrace, the saint’s concern for his monastery, and his asceticism, makesGregory and Peter central in the construction of this sacred biography.Peter’s questions and Gregory’s answers, while pedagogicdevices, also serve through synecdoche as the questions and answersof the audience. Miraculous anecdotes are reviewed, questions proposedand interpretations given. The audience, drawn into the narrative,sits, along with Peter, at the feet of Gregory the teacher,becoming participants in constructing the representation of the holyman. 7473Gregory the Great, Dialogues, trans. O. J. Zimmerman, ed. R. J. Deferrari, inThe Fathers of the Church (New York, 1959).74O’Donnell (1995), 70.
146 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANWhat were Gregory’s new emphases? For Gregory of Tours, thefigure of saint as thaumaturge, as a reservoir of almost magical power,as a posthumous miracle maker who intercedes for his devotees, wascentral. In Gregory’s Life of Saint Benedict, however, the emphasis ison the saint as a pastoral mediator of God’s grace, whose power isalways subordinated to God’s and whose deeds focus almost exclusivelyon the betterment of his new foundation. Of the thirty-six miraclesthat Gregory attributes to Benedict, only one is posthumous,and even that miracle is accomplished without the woman’s knowledgethat it was the saint who cured her (II.38). Gregory the Greatunderscores that Benedict’s miracles are res gestae done while he lived,sometimes mediated by other worthy individuals, but utterly dependenton God’s grace. 75 Most of Benedict’s miracles are not dramatichealings or exorcisms but have a pragmatic bent. These miraclestypically illustrate his concern that his monastery prosper: the restorationof a lost scythe iron, the removal of a devil who sat atop alarge rock and thus impeded the building project, the private healingof the monk hurt while building a wall, or the creation of a wellfor the use of a monastery. Such utilitarian depictions undoubtedlyappealed to a pope beset with a thousand different worldly cares,who likely saw Benedict as an alter ego and longed himself for anopportunity to live the contemplative life. When Gregory does illustrateBenedict’s healing power, he does it by shrouding the incidentwith God’s mysterious power. He clarifies the opacity of these anecdotesof the conjunction of the divine in the world through dialog,interrupting the narrative for a colloquy between the fictive figuresof Gregory and Peter. For example, in the single resurrection miracleGregory records, that of Benedict raising the dead peasant child,Benedict, when asked to help, first acknowledges his limitations, claimingthat he is unable to work such miracles: “Such miracles are notfor us, but for the holy apostles”. Benedict prays over the child’sbody; he does not touch the body, but appeals to God to overlookhis sinfulness and acknowledge the faith of the father who asks forthe favor: “O Lord, do not look at my sins, but consider the faithof the man who asks that his son be revived”. The boy is restoredto life. At this point Gregory breaks into the narrative, addressesPeter and comments: “Obviously, Peter, this miracle was not in his75Ward (1981), 2.
- Page 103 and 104: 94 MICHEL SOTdates to a group of en
- Page 105 and 106: 96 MICHEL SOT465), which gathers to
- Page 107 and 108: 98 MICHEL SOTand it has been listed
- Page 109 and 110: 100 MICHEL SOTrather than the refin
- Page 111 and 112: 102 MICHEL SOTMarcellinus Comes, go
- Page 113 and 114: 104 MICHEL SOTthe authors, is only
- Page 115 and 116: 106 MICHEL SOTBut it still belonged
- Page 117 and 118: 108 MICHEL SOTmethod. The bishop An
- Page 119 and 120: 110 MICHEL SOTLocal InformationThe
- Page 121 and 122: 112 MICHEL SOTis oriented based on
- Page 123 and 124: 114 MICHEL SOTnumerous relics of ap
- Page 125 and 126: 116 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANin contrast,
- Page 127 and 128: 118 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANlargely abse
- Page 129 and 130: 120 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANThe Beginnin
- Page 131 and 132: 122 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANThe GospelsW
- Page 133 and 134: 124 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANidentificati
- Page 135 and 136: 126 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANChristian Ep
- Page 137 and 138: 128 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthe narrativ
- Page 139 and 140: 130 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANIn Eusebius
- Page 141 and 142: 132 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANbrought new
- Page 143 and 144: 134 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANAlthough Chr
- Page 145 and 146: 136 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANtype in his
- Page 147 and 148: 138 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANresignation,
- Page 149 and 150: 140 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthe praetori
- Page 151 and 152: 142 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANAlthough Odo
- Page 153: 144 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANso that the
- Page 157 and 158: 148 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANperils of an
- Page 159 and 160: 150 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANin the same
- Page 161 and 162: 152 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthese divine
- Page 163 and 164: 154 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthrough othe
- Page 165 and 166: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 167 and 168: 158 ROLF SPRANDELepochs of the worl
- Page 169 and 170: 160 ROLF SPRANDELaforementioned pur
- Page 171 and 172: 162 ROLF SPRANDELwill be described
- Page 173 and 174: 164 ROLF SPRANDELThis goal also is
- Page 175 and 176: 166 ROLF SPRANDELpope section has b
- Page 177 and 178: 168 ROLF SPRANDELbishop and city in
- Page 179 and 180: 170 ROLF SPRANDELThe Cologne world
- Page 181 and 182: 172 ROLF SPRANDELit is a chronicle
- Page 183 and 184: 174 ROLF SPRANDELworld and relies m
- Page 185 and 186: 176 ROLF SPRANDELtaken up by Schede
- Page 187 and 188: 178 ROLF SPRANDELfew who do not fit
- Page 189 and 190: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 191 and 192: 182 NORBERT KERSKENformulated by Is
- Page 193 and 194: 184 NORBERT KERSKENA few years afte
- Page 195 and 196: 186 NORBERT KERSKENpoint of departu
- Page 197 and 198: 188 NORBERT KERSKENof which (1110/1
- Page 199 and 200: 190 NORBERT KERSKENat Sázava; and,
- Page 201 and 202: 192 NORBERT KERSKENhistoriography o
- Page 203 and 204: 194 NORBERT KERSKENnine books can b
146 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANWhat were Gregory’s new emphases? For Gregory of Tours, thefigure of saint as thaumaturge, as a reservoir of almost magical power,as a posthumous miracle maker who intercedes for his devotees, wascentral. In Gregory’s Life of Saint Benedict, however, the emphasis ison the saint as a pastoral mediator of God’s grace, whose power isalways subordinated to God’s and whose deeds focus almost exclusivelyon the betterment of his new foundation. Of the thirty-six miraclesthat Gregory attributes to Benedict, only one is posthumous,and even that miracle is accomplished without the woman’s knowledgethat it was the saint who cured her (II.38). Gregory the Greatunderscores that Benedict’s miracles are res gestae done while he lived,sometimes mediated by other worthy individuals, but utterly dependenton God’s grace. 75 Most of Benedict’s miracles are not dramatichealings or exorcisms but have a pragmatic bent. These miraclestypically illustrate his concern that his monastery prosper: the restorationof a lost scythe iron, the removal of a devil who sat atop alarge rock and thus impeded the building project, the private healingof the monk hurt while building a wall, or the creation of a wellfor the use of a monastery. Such utilitarian depictions undoubtedlyappealed to a pope beset with a thousand different worldly cares,who likely saw Benedict as an alter ego and longed himself for anopportunity to live the contemplative life. When Gregory does illustrateBenedict’s healing power, he does it by shrouding the incidentwith God’s mysterious power. He clarifies the opacity of these anecdotesof the conjunction of the divine in the world through dialog,interrupting the narrative for a colloquy between the fictive figuresof Gregory and Peter. For example, in the single resurrection miracleGregory records, that of Benedict raising the dead peasant child,Benedict, when asked to help, first acknowledges his limitations, claimingthat he is unable to work such miracles: “Such miracles are notfor us, but for the holy apostles”. Benedict prays over the child’sbody; he does not touch the body, but appeals to God to overlookhis sinfulness and acknowledge the faith of the father who asks forthe favor: “O Lord, do not look at my sins, but consider the faithof the man who asks that his son be revived”. The boy is restoredto life. At this point Gregory breaks into the narrative, addressesPeter and comments: “Obviously, Peter, this miracle was not in his75Ward (1981), 2.