HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES - Julian Emperor
LOCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL HISTORY (300‒1000) 95that those people inscribed in the diptychs were saints, hence theuse of the words to canonize to designate the process through whichthey are recognized as saints. These diptychs would have been keptin most cathedrals, but, as is the case with the local martyrologiescalled ‘primitive’, none remain today. 14It appears to have been a longstanding practice in Gaul to reciteduring the offertory of solemn masses the names of bishops, the faithful,and the saints: this practice was forbidden by Pope Innocent I(d. 417), but Venantius Fortunatus and Saint Germanus of Paris witnessedit in the fifth century. In 789, in order to conform to Romanpractice, Charlemagne ordered “that the names not be recited publiclybefore the canon” (ordinatio imperii, ca. 54), and in the Gesta ofthe abbots of Lobbes around 980, Folcuin indicated that, during mass,Archbishop Adalbero of Reims had the under-deacon read the namesof his predecessors, the archbishops, in “a commemoration of thedead named on the diptychs”. 15Léopold Delisle developed the hypothesis that the diptychs at firstconsisted of simple nomenclatures, meant to be read quickly duringthe canon of the mass, and that in these lists of names were includedthe durations of pontificate, then the date of the death of the prelate,his place of burial, and other historical details. In that way the practicesallegedly moved from the catalogue to the Gesta episcoporum, as,we shall see, they moved from the Roman catalogues to the Liberpontificalis. Dom Jacques Dubois established the fragility of this hypothesisby showing that Folcuin’s mention of a recitation ‘on the diptychs’was unique.Nevertheless, it is certain that, very early on, local churches establishedcatalogues of city bishops, perhaps in order to read them duringthe liturgy of the mass, or in order to remember them silently,or simply in order to place them on the altar. They were sometimeswritten in verse, and metric catalogues existed in Metz in the ninthcentury and Strasbourg in the tenth century, for example. Many ofthese lists can be found in various types of manuscripts, not only inliturgical manuscripts. As early as the middle of the ninth century,we have even found collections like the one from Angers (Vat. Lat.14Delisle (1885); Duchesne (1907–15); Dubois (1967) and (1976).15Folcuin, Gesta abbatum Lobiensium, ed. G. H. Pertz, MGH SS 4 (Hanover, 1841),58–59.
96 MICHEL SOT465), which gathers together the lists of bishops of Angers, Nantes,Sens, Orleans, and Mans, with a group of saints’ lives.During the intense literary activity of the Carolingian era, just asthe ordinary martyrologies developed into historical martyrologies,so were the diptychs and the simple catalogues of bishops developedinto Gesta episcoporum. But the process had been established muchearlier in the city of Rome, where we can observe it thanks to LouisDuchesne’s work on the Liber pontificalis.The Prototype of Local and Institutional History:The Roman Liber pontificalis 16In Rome, at the beginning of the sixth century, an anonymous clericbegan to establish catalogues of bishops again, in a series of biographicalentries on Roman pontiffs since Saint Peter. In order tolend authority to his work, this cleric attributed it to Pope Damasus(378–84), allegedly upon the request of Saint Jerome. After the sixthcentury, the work was continued regularly, most often by contemporariesof the popes, up to Martin V (d. 1431).This work plays a crucial role in medieval historical literature, andit can be considered the prototype of local and institutional historyfor two reasons: first, because it was developed, as would be the gestaepiscoporum and the gesta abbatum, from a catalogue that was progressivelyenriched and continued; and second, because it served as aformal model for the development of those texts. Before we look atthe form and contents of the Liber pontificalis, let us first look at itsevolution.Evolution of the Liber pontificalisAs early as the second and third centuries, lists were drawn up ofthe bishops of Rome, just as, traditionally, lists of the consuls hadbeen drawn up. But in establishing these lists, there appeared theapologetic concern to establish the continuation of ecclesiastical teachingfrom the apostles up to the contemporary bishop. It is in this16Liber pontificalis, ed. Duchesne and Vogel; Noble (1985).
- Page 53 and 54: 44 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROself-a
- Page 55 and 56: 46 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROritual
- Page 57 and 58: 48 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROoffici
- Page 59 and 60: 50 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROlong-l
- Page 61 and 62: 52 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROGregor
- Page 63 and 64: 54 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROrange
- Page 65 and 66: 56 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROTestam
- Page 67 and 68: 58 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROthe pr
- Page 69 and 70: 60 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROSchola
- Page 71 and 72: 62 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROsense
- Page 73 and 74: 64 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROThe au
- Page 75 and 76: 66 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROare in
- Page 77 and 78: 68 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROof the
- Page 79 and 80: 70 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROto att
- Page 81 and 82: 72 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROis the
- Page 83 and 84: 74 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROwere c
- Page 85 and 86: 76 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARRORecent
- Page 87 and 88: 78 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROof sec
- Page 89 and 90: 80 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROof hig
- Page 91 and 92: 82 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROinvolv
- Page 93 and 94: 84 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROprofil
- Page 95 and 96: 86 JOAQUÍN MARTÍNEZ PIZARROLombar
- Page 97 and 98: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 99 and 100: 90 MICHEL SOTAs for institutional h
- Page 101 and 102: 92 MICHEL SOTthe second century, an
- Page 103: 94 MICHEL SOTdates to a group of en
- Page 107 and 108: 98 MICHEL SOTand it has been listed
- Page 109 and 110: 100 MICHEL SOTrather than the refin
- Page 111 and 112: 102 MICHEL SOTMarcellinus Comes, go
- Page 113 and 114: 104 MICHEL SOTthe authors, is only
- Page 115 and 116: 106 MICHEL SOTBut it still belonged
- Page 117 and 118: 108 MICHEL SOTmethod. The bishop An
- Page 119 and 120: 110 MICHEL SOTLocal InformationThe
- Page 121 and 122: 112 MICHEL SOTis oriented based on
- Page 123 and 124: 114 MICHEL SOTnumerous relics of ap
- Page 125 and 126: 116 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANin contrast,
- Page 127 and 128: 118 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANlargely abse
- Page 129 and 130: 120 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANThe Beginnin
- Page 131 and 132: 122 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANThe GospelsW
- Page 133 and 134: 124 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANidentificati
- Page 135 and 136: 126 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANChristian Ep
- Page 137 and 138: 128 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthe narrativ
- Page 139 and 140: 130 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANIn Eusebius
- Page 141 and 142: 132 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANbrought new
- Page 143 and 144: 134 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANAlthough Chr
- Page 145 and 146: 136 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANtype in his
- Page 147 and 148: 138 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANresignation,
- Page 149 and 150: 140 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANthe praetori
- Page 151 and 152: 142 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANAlthough Odo
- Page 153 and 154: 144 THOMAS J. HEFFERNANso that the
LOCAL AND <strong>IN</strong>STITUTIONAL HISTORY (300‒1000) 95that those people inscribed in the diptychs were saints, hence theuse of the words to canonize to designate the process through whichthey are recognized as saints. These diptychs would have been keptin most cathedrals, but, as is the case with the local martyrologiescalled ‘primitive’, none remain today. 14It appears to have been a longstanding practice in Gaul to reciteduring the offertory of solemn masses the names of bishops, the faithful,and the saints: this practice was forbidden by Pope Innocent I(d. 417), but Venantius Fortunatus and Saint Germanus of Paris witnessedit in the fifth century. In 789, in order to conform to Romanpractice, Charlemagne ordered “that the names not be recited publiclybefore the canon” (ordinatio imperii, ca. 54), and in the Gesta ofthe abbots of Lobbes around 980, Folcuin indicated that, during mass,Archbishop Adalbero of Reims had the under-deacon read the namesof his predecessors, the archbishops, in “a commemoration of thedead named on the diptychs”. 15Léopold Delisle developed the hypothesis that the diptychs at firstconsisted of simple nomenclatures, meant to be read quickly duringthe canon of the mass, and that in these lists of names were includedthe durations of pontificate, then the date of the death of the prelate,his place of burial, and other historical details. In that way the practicesallegedly moved from the catalogue to the Gesta episcoporum, as,we shall see, they moved from the Roman catalogues to the Liberpontificalis. Dom Jacques Dubois established the fragility of this hypothesisby showing that Folcuin’s mention of a recitation ‘on the diptychs’was unique.Nevertheless, it is certain that, very early on, local churches establishedcatalogues of city bishops, perhaps in order to read them duringthe liturgy of the mass, or in order to remember them silently,or simply in order to place them on the altar. They were sometimeswritten in verse, and metric catalogues existed in Metz in the ninthcentury and Strasbourg in the tenth century, for example. Many ofthese lists can be found in various types of manuscripts, not only inliturgical manuscripts. As early as the middle of the ninth century,we have even found collections like the one from Angers (Vat. Lat.14Delisle (1885); Duchesne (1907–15); Dubois (1967) and (1976).15Folcuin, Gesta abbatum Lobiensium, ed. G. H. Pertz, MGH SS 4 (Hanover, 1841),58–59.