Thorpe, R., and Gold, J. (2010). Leadership and management development: The current state.In J. Gold, R. Thorpe and A. Mumford (eds.), Gower Handbook of Leadership and ManagementDevelopment. Farnham: Gower Publishing.Thrupp, M., and Willmott, R. (2003). Education management in managerialist times: beyond the texturalapologists. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Timperley, H. (2008). A distributed perspective on leadership and enhancing valued outcomes forstudents. Journal of <strong>Curriculum</strong> Studies, 40(6), 821-833.Trotman, D. (2009). Networking for educational change: concepts, impediments and opportunities forprimary school professional learning communities. <strong>Professional</strong> Development in Education, 35(3), 341-356.Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering Teacher <strong>Professional</strong>ism in Schools: The role of leadershiporientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217-247.University of Cambridge, Eastern Leadership Centre, MacBeath, J., Oduro, G., and Waterhouse,J. (2004). Distributed Leadership in Action: Full Report. Nottingham: National College for SchoolLeadership.Vescio, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learningcommunities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91.Ward, L., and Parr, J. (2006). Authority, Volunteerism, and Sustainability: Creating and Sustaining anOnline Community through Teacher Leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 109 - 129.Watson, L. (2005). Quality Teaching and School Leadership: A scan of research findings. Final Report.Canberra: Lifelong <strong>Learning</strong> Network, University of Canberra.Webster-Wright, Ann (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authenticprofessional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2): 702-739.Weston, M., and Bain, A. (2009). Engaging with change: a model for adopting and evaluating schoolbasedinnovation. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 156-175.Woodbury, S., and Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the Paradox of <strong>Change</strong> without Difference: AModel of <strong>Change</strong> in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform. Educational Policy, 16(5), 763-782.Woods, P. A., and Gronn, P. (2009). Nurturing Democracy: The Contribution of Distributed Leadershipto a Democratic Organizational Landscape. Educational Management Administration and Leadership,37(4), 430-451.Woods, P. A., Bennett, N., Harvey, J. A., and Wise, C. (2004). Variabilities and Dualities in DistributedLeadership: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. Educational Management Administration andLeadership, 32(4), 439-457.Wynne, S. (2009). GACE Educational Leadership 173, 174 Teacher Certification Test Prep Study Guide.Cambridge MA: XAMOnline.Yammarino, F., Dionne, S., Chun, J., and Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: Astate-of-the-science review. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 879-919.York-Barr, J., and Duke, K. (2004). What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From TwoDecades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316.York-Barr, J., Sommerness, J., Duke, K., & Ghere, G. (2005). Special educators in inclusive educationprogrammes: reframing their work as teacher leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education,9(2), 193 - 215.Zembylas, M. and H. Barker (2007). Teachers’ spaces for coping with change in the context of a reformeffort. Journal of Educational <strong>Change</strong>, 8(3): 235-256.43 <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Flagship</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: <strong>Leading</strong> <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: Literature Review
<strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Flagship</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: <strong>Leading</strong> <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: Literature Review 44
- Page 1 and 2: Professional Learning FlagshipProgr
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsIntroduction ..............
- Page 5 and 6: Curriculum change: Implications for
- Page 7 and 8: Table 1: Overview of factors affect
- Page 9 and 10: This emphasis on capacity-building
- Page 11 and 12: Much of the foregoing discussion is
- Page 13 and 14: Features of successful professional
- Page 16 and 17: p. 1051) conclude that, ‘Findings
- Page 18 and 19: 2007; Gruenert 2005; Printy 2008; S
- Page 20 and 21: RecommendationsProfessional learnin
- Page 22 and 23: impersonal relationships• rationa
- Page 24 and 25: • The organisational goals are di
- Page 26 and 27: Table 2: Two views of teacher leade
- Page 28 and 29: A range of specifications and stand
- Page 30 and 31: In secondary schools, teacher leade
- Page 32 and 33: 1. Stimulus for innovation — Why
- Page 34 and 35: Table 4: Elements and processes of
- Page 36 and 37: The education of Indigenous student
- Page 38 and 39: ReferencesAinscow, M. (2005). Devel
- Page 40 and 41: Daly, A. J. (2009). Rigid Response
- Page 42 and 43: Hall, R. (1997). Knowledge Use and
- Page 44 and 45: Meirink, J., Meijer, P., Verloop, N
- Page 48: aitsl.edu.auFurther informationTele
Change language