Hall, R. (1997). Knowledge Use and the Dynamics of Managing <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Change</strong>. ScienceCommunication, 18(4), 342-361.Hallinger, P. (2007). Research on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership:Retrospect and prospect. Paper presented at the 2007 conference of the Australian Council forEducational Research, The Leadership Challenge – Improving learning in schools. Melbourne.Hallinger, P., and Heck, R. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding theimpact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management: Formerly SchoolOrganisation, 30(2), 95 - 110.Hallinger, P., and Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for <strong>Learning</strong>: Does Collaborative Leadership Make aDifference in School Improvement? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38(6),654-678.Hameyer, U. (2007). Transforming domain knowledge: a systemic view at the school curriculum.<strong>Curriculum</strong> Journal, 18(4), 411 - 427.Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., and Wayman, J. (2009). Usingstudent achievement data to support instructional decision making. Washington DC: National Centerfor Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department ofEducation.Hannay, L. M., and Ross, J. A. (1999). Department Heads as Middle Managers? Questioning the BlackBox. School Leadership and Management: Formerly School Organisation, 19(3), 345 - 358.Hargreaves, A., and Goodson, I. (2006). Educational <strong>Change</strong> Over Time? The Sustainability andNonsustainability of Three Decades of Secondary School <strong>Change</strong> and Continuity. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41.Harris, A. (2007). Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. InternationalJournal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 315 - 325.Harris, A. (2008). Distributed school leadership: Developing tomorrow’s leaders. Abingdon: Routledge.Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., and Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership andorganizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational <strong>Change</strong>, 8(4), 337-347.Harrison, C., and Killion, J. (2007). Ten Roles for Teacher Leaders, Educational Leadership. 65(1), 74-77.House, E. (1981) Three perspectives on innovation. In R. Lehming and M. Kane (eds.) ImprovingSchools: Using what we know. Beverley Hills: Sage.Hoy, W. K., Gage, C. Q., and Tarter, C. J. (2006). School Mindfulness and Faculty Trust: NecessaryConditions for Each Other? Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 236-255.Hoy, W., and Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of faculty trustin schools: The Omnibus T-Scale. In W. Hoy and C. Miskel (eds.), Studies in leading and organizingschools. Greenwich CT: Information Age.Hughes, P., Matthews, S. and Khan, G. (2007) Leaders acting to improve outcomes for Indigenousstudents. Paper presented at the 2007 conference of the Australian Council for Educational Research,The Leadership Challenge –Improving learning in schools. Melbourne.Hynds, A. (2010) Unpacking resistance to change within-school reform programmes with a social justiceorientation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(4), 377-392.Ikemoto, G. S., and Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting Through the ‘Data-Driven’ Mantra: DifferentConceptions of Data-Driven Decision Making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study ofEducation, 106(1), 105-131.39 <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Flagship</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: <strong>Leading</strong> <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: Literature Review
Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A. and Brooks, J. (2009). Leadership for Social Justice: Preparing 21stCentury School Leaders for a New Social Order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1),2-31.Johnson, C. C. (2007). Technical, political and cultural barriers to science education reform. InternationalJournal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 171 - 190.Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., and Swinnerton, J. A. (2007). Chapter 4 Understanding the Promise andDynamics of Data-Informed Leadership. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,106(1), 74-104.Kochan, F., and Reed, C. (2005). Collaborative Leadership, Community Building, and Democracy inPublic Education. In F. English (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Educational Leadership: Advances intheory, research and practice (pp. 68-84). London: Sage Publications.Kose, B. and Lim, E. (2010). Transformative professional development: relationship to teachers’ beliefs,expertise and teaching. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(4), 393-419.Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated <strong>Learning</strong>: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Leithwood, K., and Mascall, B. (2008). Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement.Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561.Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., and Mascall, B. (2002). A framework for research on large-scale reform.Journal of Educational <strong>Change</strong> 3, 7–33.Leithwood, K., Pattern, S., and Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a Conception of How School LeadershipInfluences Student <strong>Learning</strong>. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671-706.Levin, B. (2010). Leadership for evidence-informed education. School Leadership and Management:Formerly School Organisation, 30(4), 303 - 315.Lewis, M., & Andrews, D. (2009). Parallel leadership: Changing landscapes for principals. In N.Cranston & L. Ehrich (eds.) Australian School Leadership Today. Bowen Hills: Australian AcademicPress.Lloyd, M. and Mayer, D. (2010). Review of the AITSL Draft Standards for <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Learning</strong><strong>Program</strong>s. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Brisbane.Loucks-Horsley, S. (1996). The Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM): A model for change inindividuals Retrieved 22/3/2011, 2011, from http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg4a.htmLouis, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., Anderson, S., Michlin, M., Mascall, B., et al. (2010). <strong>Learning</strong>from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student <strong>Learning</strong>. Final Report of Research to theWallace Foundation. Minneapolis: Wallace Foundation.Lumby, J. (2006). Conceptualizing Diversity and Leadership: Evidence from 10 Cases. EducationalManagement Administration and Leadership, 34(2), 151-165.Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: Exploring the Multiple Usages of theConcept in the Field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424-435.McCulloch, G. (1998). <strong>Curriculum</strong> reform, educational change and school improvement. In A.Hargreaves (ed.) International Handbook of Educational <strong>Change</strong>. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 1203-1215.McDonald, D. (2003). <strong>Curriculum</strong> change and the post-modern world: Is the school curriculum-reformmovement an anachronism? Journal of <strong>Curriculum</strong> Studies. 35(2), 139-149.McKenzie, K. B., Christman, D. E., Hernandez, F., Fierro, E., Capper, C. A., Dantley, M., et al. (2008).From the Field: A Proposal for Educating Leaders for Social Justice. Educational AdministrationQuarterly, 44(1), 111-138.<strong>Professional</strong> <strong>Learning</strong> <strong>Flagship</strong> <strong>Program</strong>: <strong>Leading</strong> <strong>Curriculum</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: Literature Review 40
- Page 1 and 2: Professional Learning FlagshipProgr
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsIntroduction ..............
- Page 5 and 6: Curriculum change: Implications for
- Page 7 and 8: Table 1: Overview of factors affect
- Page 9 and 10: This emphasis on capacity-building
- Page 11 and 12: Much of the foregoing discussion is
- Page 13 and 14: Features of successful professional
- Page 16 and 17: p. 1051) conclude that, ‘Findings
- Page 18 and 19: 2007; Gruenert 2005; Printy 2008; S
- Page 20 and 21: RecommendationsProfessional learnin
- Page 22 and 23: impersonal relationships• rationa
- Page 24 and 25: • The organisational goals are di
- Page 26 and 27: Table 2: Two views of teacher leade
- Page 28 and 29: A range of specifications and stand
- Page 30 and 31: In secondary schools, teacher leade
- Page 32 and 33: 1. Stimulus for innovation — Why
- Page 34 and 35: Table 4: Elements and processes of
- Page 36 and 37: The education of Indigenous student
- Page 38 and 39: ReferencesAinscow, M. (2005). Devel
- Page 40 and 41: Daly, A. J. (2009). Rigid Response
- Page 44 and 45: Meirink, J., Meijer, P., Verloop, N
- Page 46 and 47: Thorpe, R., and Gold, J. (2010). Le
- Page 48: aitsl.edu.auFurther informationTele