Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ...

Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ... Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ...

westernbasinportdevelopment.com.au
from westernbasinportdevelopment.com.au More from this publisher
21.07.2015 Views

eference sites, 22 mullet (46.81%) displayed external signs of abnormalities and these wereseen during both trips. The conditions observed are summarised in Figure 33.Conditions observed in mullet sampled at each site Phase 225Skin Colour Normal Skin pale pink areas ventrally Skin Minor RednessSkin General redness Cloudy Eye Areas of detached scalesUlceration20Number of fish151050Fitzroy River(n = 21)Calliope River(n = 18)lower Boyne River(n = 20)upper Boyne River(n = 20)Rodds Bay(n = 20)Bundaberg(n = 26)LocationFigure 33. The combined results for conditions observed in mullet at all sites sampled during Phase 2,2012. Note, (n) refers to the total number of fish examined at each site. Some fish may have beenobserved with multiple conditions.In mullet, skin lesions were far less prevalent than barramundi, with only two lesionsrecorded.Laboratory findings Phase 2Collectively, Gladstone sites appeared to contain healthier mullet than the reference sites inApril 2012, but in June/July 2012 the trend was reversed.In April, the only significant differences (P < 0.05) between Gladstone and reference siteswere that Gladstone mullet had significantly lower incidence of skin redness than thereference sites. The cause of the difference is not known. In June/July, fin and kidneyabnormalities were significantly more prevalent in Gladstone sites than reference sites (P

Sharks and raysThe monitoring program collected information on shark species, size, sex, presence andseverity of observed signs of ill health, as well as commercial catch information supplied byfishers via commercial logbooks.During Phase 1, no candidate species of shark had been identified, therefore all sharks andrays encountered during routine, at sea observing or targeted sampling events wereobserved for signs of ill health. During Phase 2, the sampling identified bull sharks as thecandidate species given they were the dominant species in the catch during Phase 1 (Figure34).Figure 34. Bull sharkSampling sites for shark during Phase 1 included the Calliope River, Rodds Bay, SpoilGround and nearby offshore waters, the Narrows, Hamilton Point, the upper and lowerreaches of the Boyne River, as well as the Fitzroy River and Bundaberg (reference sites).Sampling sites for shark during Phase 2 included the Calliope River, Boyne River (upper andlower reaches), Rodds Bay, as well as the Fitzroy River and Bundaberg (reference sites).Commercial catchThe commercial catch of shark species in the Gladstone region (CFish grid S30, as reportedin commercial logbooks for both line and net combined) between 2000 and 2011 peaked in2008 at 157.40 t. The recorded catch then declined sharply to 44.55 t in 2009 and hascontinued to fall to 26.32 t in 2011 (Figure 35). In 2012, minimal catch was reported (0.44 t).54

eference sites, 22 mullet (46.81%) displayed external signs of abnormalities and these wereseen during both trips. The conditions observed are summarised in Figure 33.Conditions observed in mullet sampled at each site Phase 225Skin Colour Normal Skin pale pink areas ventrally Skin Minor RednessSkin General redness Cloudy Eye Areas of detached scalesUlceration20Number of fish151050Fitzroy River(n = 21)Calliope River(n = 18)lower Boyne River(n = 20)upper Boyne River(n = 20)Rodds Bay(n = 20)Bundaberg(n = 26)LocationFigure 33. The combined results for conditions observed in mullet at all sites sampled during Phase 2,<strong>2012</strong>. Note, (n) refers to the total number of fish examined at each site. Some fish may have beenobserved with multiple conditions.In mullet, skin lesions were far less prevalent than barramundi, with only two lesionsrecorded.Laboratory findings Phase 2Collectively, <strong>Gladstone</strong> sites appeared to contain healthier mullet than the reference sites inApril <strong>2012</strong>, but in June/July <strong>2012</strong> the trend was reversed.In April, the only significant differences (P < 0.05) between <strong>Gladstone</strong> and reference siteswere that <strong>Gladstone</strong> mullet had significantly lower incidence of skin redness than thereference sites. The cause of the difference is not known. In June/July, fin and kidneyabnormalities were significantly more prevalent in <strong>Gladstone</strong> sites than reference sites (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!