21.07.2015 Views

Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ...

Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ...

Gladstone Fish Health Investigation 2011 - 2012 - Western Basin ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Contaminants in Tissue of <strong>Fish</strong> and Crabs Collected in the <strong>Gladstone</strong> Aream. Lead.Bundaberg Fitzroy R. The Narrows Port area Avg. s.e.Trip 1 0.166 ab 0.143 ab 0.073 b 0.064 b 0.043Trip 2 0.068 b 0.076 b 0.231 a 0.129 abThe results for lead need to be taken with some caution, as there were only four values recorded as‘> the level of resolution’ (on a wet-weight basis). For the remaining 36 values which were ‘< 0.05’(hence taken as 0.025), conversion from wet to dry-weight basis introduced reasonable variation, asthe moisture content varied quite widely - between 55% (where 0.025 converts to 0.056) and 82%(converts to 0.139). So whilst this data set appears to contain the usual amounts of variability,amongst which the analysis found some significant differences, in reality these are based on fewactual values. The observed distribution of these values also results in significant regionaldifferences (see Table 2.4). The lead values measured as ‘> the level of resolution’ were one eachfor Bundaberg and the Fitzroy River (both on trip 1), and one each for the Narrows and Port area(both on trip 2). All four of these crabs were rated as ‘normal’.This was not a problem with any other metal. Chromium was the only other one with any ‘< thelevel of resolution’ values, and had 20 of these along with 20 actual values, so constituted a validanalysis.Overall (multivariate patterns)Relationships amongst the metals can be measured by the correlation coefficient, r. Table 2.3 liststhese values, which show the direction and relative strength of these relationships.Table 2.3. Correlation matrix for the metals. Significant (P < 0.05) correlations have an absolutevalue > 0.310, and are indicated in bold.Aluminium 1.000Chromium 0.090 1.000Iron 0.022 0.295 1.000Nickel -0.057 0.157 -0.032 1.000Copper 0.138 -0.011 -0.158 0.319 1.000Zinc -0.128 -0.083 0.371 0.144 0.160 1.000Arsenic -0.022 0.211 0.436 0.100 0.055 0.443 1.000Selenium 0.102 0.303 0.367 0.453 0.425 0.361 0.602Silver 0.236 0.182 0.233 0.234 0.683 0.180 0.250Cadmium 0.202 0.116 0.320 0.018 0.228 0.266 0.312Barium 0.135 0.458 0.260 -0.156 0.111 0.118 0.193Mercury -0.044 -0.059 -0.021 -0.262 -0.065 -0.217 0.032Lead -0.042 0.402 0.363 -0.062 -0.097 -0.024 0.080Aluminium Chromium Iron Nickel Copper Zinc ArsenicSelenium 1.000Silver 0.391 1.000Cadmium 0.071 0.686 1.000Barium -0.066 0.381 0.583 1.000Mercury -0.038 0.214 0.339 0.176 1.000Lead 0.121 0.107 -0.086 0.138 0.000 1.000Selenium Silver Cadmium Barium Mercury LeadPage 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!