PNABD246.pdf

PNABD246.pdf PNABD246.pdf

pdf.usaid.gov
from pdf.usaid.gov More from this publisher
05.12.2012 Views

More than 3000 mungbean accessions were screened for insect resistance in the field. Fifty seeds of each variety were sown as a single row in a 5m x 0.75m plot. Selected resistant accessions were then sent to Thailand, Philippines and Indonesia where the screening was done to find varieties resistant to local strains. Selected beanfly resistant and susceptible varieties were examined for resistant mechanism in the field and in the greenhouse. The results showed that the mechanism of resistance to insect was non-preference. A positive correlation was found between the thickness of mungbean leaf and beanfly infection rate (r=0.8165). This implied that beanflies prefer to eat or lay eggs in thick leaf varieties. Other mechanism will need further study. [PLH/NSTj *0690 Su, C.Y. ; Ross, A. 1976. Field testing of insecticides for the control of insects on legumes. PLANT PROTECTION BULLETIN (R.O.C.), v.18(4):414. [ChJ (REP.MB-1067) (NOTE: Abstract translated by Prof. Yau I Chu) Nine insecticides were tested for controlling beanfly on soybean and mungbean at AVRDC. The insecticides of EC, SCW, SP, WP formulation were applied 3 times after germination. The granular insecticides were applied once at sowing. Carbofuran 3% G (2.0 kg a.i./ha), Oxamyl 24% LC (0.25 kg a.i./ha), phorate 10% G (2.0 kg a.i./ha), carbofuran 40.64% F (1.0 kg a.i./ha), triazophos 40% EC (0.25 kg a.i./ha), and omethoate 50% LC (0.25 kg a.i./ha) were effective in controlling the pest. [THH] *0691 Su, C.Y. ; Kung, S.P. ; Rose, R.I. 1976. Control of beanflies in mungbeans and asparagus beans, 1975. INSECTICIDE AND ACARICIDE TESTS, v.1:53. [En] (REP.MB-1066) Beanflies are pests of various important food legumes including mungbean, soybean, adzuki bean, lima bean, snap bean, cowpea and asparagus bean. Field plot evaluations of insecticides for their control were carried out in ten square meter plots. Each insecticide tested was applied to four replicated plots in a RCB experimental field design. For each crop planting, nine insecticides and one control were evaluated. Granular formulated insecticides were applied by hand with the amount for each ro. or the plot being previously weighed. Emulsifiable and wettable powder formulations were applied with 10 lb. air pressure sprayers calibrated with a stopwatch. For the emulsifiable or wettable powder formulated insecticides, 500 ml spray were applied per plot. Methods of control evaluation were based on the dissection and count of the number of larvae and pupae as well as the number of damaged plants in a thirty plant sample. Under the conditions of three field tests in which 27 insecticides were evaluated, the most effective were carbofuran, triazophos, mephosfolan, diazinon, DDT and disulfoton and aldicarb. [AS] *0692 Ibrahim, A.G.B. 1977. Increased production of leguminous crops through control of bean-fly. Serdang : University Pertanian Malaysia. 12p. [En] [En Abstj (REP.MB-1762) MEETING: Conference on Food and Agriculture Malaysia 2000 - Serdang, Malaysia, Jul 25-29, 1977 (NOTE: Paper presented at the Conference) 179

Field trials were conducted to assess the effect of beanfly, Ophiomyla phaseoli (Tryon) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on crop losses in four legumes; Phaseolus vulgaris, Vigna radiata, V. sesquipedalis and Glycine max. In the absence of chemical control 65% of P. vulgaris seedlings were killed one month after seeding. Among the five insecticides tested to control the beanfly, dimethoate was most effective giving significant yield (P less than 0.05) increase. The nature of damage by the pest is discussed. [AS] *0693 Burikam, I. 1978. Ecological investigation on the bean fly, Ophiomyla phaseoli (Tryon) (Diptera: Agromyzidae), and its natural enemies in Thailand. Bangkok : Kasetsart University. 7 1p. [En] [En Abst] (Thesis - M.Sc.) (SB945.L55B8) In Thailand the most important natural enemies of the bean fly, Ophiomyia phaseoli, were Plutarchia sp. and Biosteres sp. Other less important natural enemies included a eulophid, a pteromalid, a cynipid and a species each of nematode and ant. Under laboratory condition, 0. phaseoli was capable of laying 77.12 [plus or minus] 21.56 eggs during an oviposition period of 13.36 [plus or minus] 3.17 days. Larvae moulted 3 times and the total larval stage was 7.37 [plus or minus] 0.49 days. The growth increment of larvae based on the length of cephalopharyngeal apparatus followed Dyar's Law with the mean geometric ratio of 1.882. The pupal stage averaged 7.76 [plus or minus] 0.73 days. The longevity of male and female adults were 7.13 [plus or minus] 2.39 and 15.42 [plus or minus] 3.78 days, respectively. Life cycle from egg to adult stage was 18.45 [plus or minus] 0.76 days. The analysis of the life tables of 0. phaseoll revealed the followed population statistics: the net reproductive rate of increase (Ro) = 16.92, the capacity for increase (rc) = 0.101, the cohort generation time (Tc) = 28.001 days, and the finite rate of increase [lambda] 1.106. The population study of 0. phaseoli indicated that 0. phaseoli attacked mungbean, during seedling stage and began to move out at the end of the vegetative stage prior to flowering. The analysis of the population density found that there was a density-dependent factor regulating the population. The biological study of the larval-pupal parasite, Plutarchia sp., revealed that life cycle from egg to adult emergence was 17.47 [plus or minus] 0.92 days. The femal adult developed 9.32 [plus or minus] 2.15 eggs per day. The life history of Biosteres sp., a eulophid and a pteromalid was studied to a less extent. The assessment and evaluation of Plutarchia sp. as a biological control agent required additional investigation. This investigation could be employed for the implementation of a pest management program for 0. phaseoli. [AS] *0694 Lin, C.S. 1979. Varietal resistance of mung bean to the bean fly and the other agromyzids. University of Hawaii. xi, 107p. (SB945.L55L5) The beanfly (Ophiomyia phaseoli Tryon) was the most common species, followed in abundance by Melanagromyza sojae Zehntner at the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC). Evaluating legumes in the genus Vigna for resistance to the beanfly, the adzuki bean was the most susceptible and the rice bean was the most resistant to attack. Scatter diagram of the resistance and susceptibility of the test varieties to the beanfly damage on the basis of standard deviation of the percent plant mortality, the nuwber of larvae and puparia per plant, and the number of leaf punctures was nn effective method used to categorize and evaluate the resistance and susceptibility of the test varieties. Mungbean varieties were screened for resistance to the beanfly and agromyzid leaf miner (Liriomyza spp.) at AVRDC, Taiwan and Waimanalo, Hawaii. Three varieties (V 2533, V 2535, V 2545) were in the resistant category. The 180

More than 3000 mungbean accessions were screened for insect resistance in<br />

the field. Fifty seeds of each variety were sown as a single row in a 5m x<br />

0.75m plot. Selected resistant accessions were then sent to Thailand,<br />

Philippines and Indonesia where the screening was done to find varieties<br />

resistant to local strains. Selected beanfly resistant and susceptible<br />

varieties were examined for resistant mechanism in the field and in the<br />

greenhouse. The results showed that the mechanism of resistance to insect was<br />

non-preference. A positive correlation was found between the thickness of<br />

mungbean leaf and beanfly infection rate (r=0.8165). This implied that<br />

beanflies prefer to eat or lay eggs in thick leaf varieties. Other mechanism<br />

will need further study. [PLH/NSTj<br />

*0690 Su, C.Y. ; Ross, A. 1976. Field testing of insecticides for the<br />

control of insects on legumes. PLANT PROTECTION BULLETIN (R.O.C.),<br />

v.18(4):414. [ChJ (REP.MB-1067)<br />

(NOTE: Abstract translated by Prof. Yau I Chu)<br />

Nine insecticides were tested for controlling beanfly on soybean and<br />

mungbean at AVRDC. The insecticides of EC, SCW, SP, WP formulation were applied<br />

3 times after germination. The granular insecticides were applied once at<br />

sowing. Carbofuran 3% G (2.0 kg a.i./ha), Oxamyl 24% LC (0.25 kg a.i./ha),<br />

phorate 10% G (2.0 kg a.i./ha), carbofuran 40.64% F (1.0 kg a.i./ha),<br />

triazophos 40% EC (0.25 kg a.i./ha), and omethoate 50% LC (0.25 kg a.i./ha)<br />

were effective in controlling the pest. [THH]<br />

*0691 Su, C.Y. ; Kung, S.P. ; Rose, R.I. 1976. Control of beanflies in<br />

mungbeans and asparagus beans, 1975. INSECTICIDE AND ACARICIDE TESTS, v.1:53.<br />

[En] (REP.MB-1066)<br />

Beanflies are pests of various important food legumes including mungbean,<br />

soybean, adzuki bean, lima bean, snap bean, cowpea and asparagus bean. Field<br />

plot evaluations of insecticides for their control were carried out in ten<br />

square meter plots. Each insecticide tested was applied to four replicated<br />

plots in a RCB experimental field design. For each crop planting, nine<br />

insecticides and one control were evaluated. Granular formulated insecticides<br />

were applied by hand with the amount for each ro. or the plot being previously<br />

weighed. Emulsifiable and wettable powder formulations were applied with 10 lb.<br />

air pressure sprayers calibrated with a stopwatch. For the emulsifiable or<br />

wettable powder formulated insecticides, 500 ml spray were applied per plot.<br />

Methods of control evaluation were based on the dissection and count of the<br />

number of larvae and pupae as well as the number of damaged plants in a thirty<br />

plant sample. Under the conditions of three field tests in which 27<br />

insecticides were evaluated, the most effective were carbofuran, triazophos,<br />

mephosfolan, diazinon, DDT and disulfoton and aldicarb. [AS]<br />

*0692 Ibrahim, A.G.B. 1977. Increased production of leguminous crops<br />

through control of bean-fly. Serdang : University Pertanian Malaysia. 12p.<br />

[En] [En Abstj (REP.MB-1762)<br />

MEETING: Conference on Food and Agriculture Malaysia 2000 - Serdang,<br />

Malaysia, Jul 25-29, 1977<br />

(NOTE: Paper presented at the Conference)<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!