05.12.2012 Views

PNABD246.pdf

PNABD246.pdf

PNABD246.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MEETING: Workshop [on' Kharif Pulses, 9th -- New Delhi, India, Jun 7-9, 1973<br />

A total of 673 mungbean lines were screened for resistance to whitefly,<br />

mungbean yellow mosaic virus and jassids. four varieties, viz., 10866, LM 47,<br />

LM 141, and LM 364, were found to be resistant to whitefly as well as mungbean<br />

yellow mosaic virus. They were also relatively less infected by jassids. [THH]<br />

*0671 Srivastava, A.S. ; Srivastava, K.M. ; Singh, L.N. ; Singh, R.P. ;<br />

Srivastava, R.L. 1975. Relative susceptibility of some green gram (Phaseolus<br />

aureus Roxb.) varieties to galerucid beetle, Hadurasia obseurella Jocob and pod<br />

borer, Euchrysops cnejus Fabricius. LABDEV JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,<br />

PART B: LIFE SCIENCE, v. 13(3/4):221-222. [En] [En AbstJ (REP.MB-2681)<br />

Eleven mungbean varieties were tested against galerucid beetle (Madurasia<br />

obscurella Jacob) and pod borer (Euchrysops cnejus Fabricius) to establish<br />

their relative susceptibility. None of them was resistant but considerable<br />

differences were evident in the level of susceptibility. [THH]<br />

*0672 Tengkano, W. ; Soekarna, D. 1976. Screening of mungbean (Phaseolus<br />

radiatus) varieties for resistance to the bean fly, Agromyza phaseoli Coq.<br />

LAPORAN KEMAJUAN PENELITIAN SERI HAMA/PENYAKIT (RESERCH PROGRESS REPORT),<br />

no.4:39-47. [En] (REP.MB-2060)<br />

In all, 100 mungbean varieties were screened for resistance to beanfly<br />

(Ophiomyia phaseoli Tryon) at Bogor in September 1977 when the beanfly<br />

population was high. The adults on the seedling were counted each day from 5 to<br />

12 days after sowing. The high number of adults was observed from 5 to 7 days<br />

after sowing. Plants of the most susceptible variety were killed by 0.<br />

phaseoli. All varieties were susceptible. [THH]<br />

*0673 Gunasekaran, G.R. ; Kumaresan, D. ; Balasubramanian, G. ; Jayaraj, S.<br />

; Marappan, P.V. 1977. Relative susceptibility of blackgram varieties to stem<br />

fly and pod borer. MADRAS AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL, v.64(I):56-57. [En]<br />

(REP.MB-1992)<br />

Blackgram is damaged severely by beanfly (Ophiomyia phaseoli Tryon) in the<br />

early stage and by pod borer (Catochrysops cnejus F.) at the pod formation. All<br />

160 blackgram varieties were screened against beanfly during November 1973 and<br />

33 varieties against pod borer during 1974. The beanfly incidence was 4 to 10%<br />

in the varieties Coconada, No 55, Karaikal, Killikulam, Khargoan 3, Vilakudi,<br />

US 131, Tenkasi, P 58, P 47, Udgir, L 32-5, Chicknabroad, B-I, Dhone, T 65 and<br />

338-8 indicating high resistance in them. Among the 33 varieties, only one<br />

variety No 55 recorded a high resistance to pod borer with 8% damage. The<br />

variety No 55 was resistant to both beanfly and pod borer, recording 4 and 8%<br />

incidence, respectively. [THH]<br />

*0674 Kooner, B.S. ; Singh, Kuldip ; Singh, Harcharan ; Singh, K.B. 1977.<br />

Field-screening of mungbean germplasm against whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gen.)<br />

and yellow mosaic. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH (PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY),<br />

v.14(I):75-76. [En] [En Abst] (REP.MB-2538)<br />

174

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!