05.12.2012 Views

PNABD246.pdf

PNABD246.pdf

PNABD246.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P. atropurpureus, D. lablab, D. biflorus and Ficus religiosa. All the 24<br />

mungbean varieties tested were susceptible. [ASJ<br />

*0316 Jindal, J.K. ; Patel, P.N. 1980. Variability in xanthomonads of grain<br />

legumes. 1. Pathogenic behaviour and taxonomy. JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY,<br />

v.99:332-356. [EnJ [En De Abstj (A:PS)<br />

Comparative host-range of ten xanthomonads isolated from nine pulse crops<br />

[including mungbean and blackgramj was studied using five inoculation methods.<br />

Typ; oi reaction and the presence or absence of bacterial ooze in the infected<br />

tissuE were noted to indicate compatibility or noncompatibility. Degrees of<br />

compatibility (susceptibility) could be noted on the basis of intensity of<br />

bacterial ooze and severity in the symptoms. The results revealed that some of<br />

these pathogens were cross-infective, and had overlapping host-range but all<br />

were more aggressive on their natural host. These findings suggest close<br />

evolutionary relationship among the pulse xanthomonads and form a distinct<br />

group among the legume xanthomonads. Compatibility of pulse xanthomonads to<br />

bean is considered a good criterion for taxonomic revision at subspecies level.<br />

It is proposed that X. phaseoli var. fuscans and X. phaseoli from Dolichos<br />

lablab be considered as strains of X. phaseoli, and X. cyamopsidis, X. phaseoli<br />

var. sojense, X. vignicola, X. phaseoli from V. radiata (Syn. P. aureus), V.<br />

mungo and V. aconitifolia be given a status of forma specialis in X. phaseoli.<br />

X. phaseoli isolates from V. mungo and V. radiata, which do not cross infect,<br />

were highly virulent on P. sublobatus. This suggests that evolution in these<br />

xanthomonads towards the specialized pathogenic forms occurred simul'aneously<br />

with the evolution of their hosts. Similarly, among the pulse xanthomonads only<br />

the ones from V. mungo, V. radiata and V. unguiculata (Syn. V. sinensis)<br />

produced susceptible reaction on attached V. unguiculata pods, suggesting close<br />

evolutionary relationships among these hosts and these pathogens, and give<br />

indirect support to the recent transfer of P. aureus and P. mungo to the genus<br />

Vigna. LAS]<br />

*0317 Jindal, J.K. ; Patel, P.N. ; Khan, A.M. 1981. Variability in<br />

zanthomonads of grain legumes. 2. Pathogenic variability in Xanthononas<br />

phaseoli aungbean strain, X. vignicola and X. phaseoli var. sojense. JOURNAL<br />

OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, v.100(1):1-9. [En] [En De Abst] (A:PS)<br />

Pathogenic variability in three pulse xanthomonads has been inveptigated.<br />

Out of the 45 mungbean genotypes tested using rub-inoculation method, 32<br />

reacted as resistant, 6 as susceptible and the remaining 7, viz., P-23, P-28,<br />

P-125, P-161, P-10875, PLM-95 and PLM-141 showed differential reactions to the<br />

11 isolates of the leaf spot pathogen (X. phaseoli mungbean strain). On the<br />

basis of these studies six distinct races were identified. Cowpea blight<br />

pathogen (X. vignicola) showed differences in virulence and attackability<br />

(Pathogenic races) when 12 resistant and 23 susceptible cowpea genotypei; were<br />

inoculated with 11 isolates using stem-stab method. Of the resistant Ites,<br />

nine rpaced as resistant to all the isolates and three, P-370, P-1325 r'd<br />

P-1418 differentiated these isolates into five races. On susceptible vazteties<br />

isolate XC-3 proved to be the most virulent, whereas XC-9 was least viru,ent.<br />

Soybean pustule organism (X. phaseoli var. sojense) showed no pathogenic<br />

variability when 15 resistant and 5 susceptible g¢enotypes were spray-inoculated<br />

with eight isolates. [AS]<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!