05.12.2012 Views

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

352 Insect pests in plantations: case studies<br />

The geographical distribution of S. malabaricus is limited to peninsular India,<br />

with other species occurring elsewhere.<br />

Impact In teak saplings, the damage caused by S. malabaricus is limited<br />

to tunnelling of the pith and feeding on the bark over a small patch or in<br />

an incomplete ring around the tunnel mouth. In most cases, this damage is<br />

negligible. Rarely, some saplings break off at the point of injury and some<br />

become ring-barked, resulting in death of the top portion. Among plantation<br />

tree species, Acacia auriculiformis, Neolamarckia cadamba, Calliandra callothyrsus,<br />

Casuarina equisetifolia, Eucalyptus spp., Gmelina arborea, Falcataria moluccana and<br />

Sterculia companulata are attacked (Nair, 1987b). A survey in Kerala, India, showed<br />

that the incidence of infestation ranged from zero to 61% in teak plantations<br />

and zero to 11% in eucalypt plantations. In most plantations, infestations<br />

became visible when weed growth was cleared and general observations suggest<br />

that plantations with dense weed cover are more prone to attack. S. malabaricus<br />

attack is not a serious problem except in highly valuable plantations, although<br />

the large larva and the conspicuous frass mat covering the tunnel mouth create<br />

a scare among growers who may fear further spread of attack, without knowing<br />

that the life cycle is annual. S. malabaricus accounted for about 22% of all<br />

requests for advice on control received by the Kerala Forest Research Institute in<br />

India from the State Forest Department, indicating that the perceived impact<br />

was much greater than the real impact (Nair et al., 1996c).<br />

Natural enemies Rare instances of predation by woodpeckers, which<br />

extract the larvae by making a peck hole at the base of the stem, where the larva<br />

rests during the day, were noticed but the larvae are not reachable when in the<br />

root portion. Although many species of ants attack the larvae when in the open,<br />

the frass mat cover affords protection against them. Rare instances of infestation<br />

by the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae, which causes mummification of the larvae,<br />

have been recorded (Nair, 1987b).<br />

Control In view of the low economic importance of S. malabaricus<br />

infestation, no control operation is necessary in most large-scale plantations.<br />

Control is necessary only in high value plantations.<br />

Generally, it is difficult to control borers because insecticides cannot<br />

reach their concealed habitat easily. Methods recommended in the past against<br />

this borer included; (1) allowing naturally growing saplings of more attractive<br />

host plants to remain in the plantation to act as trap plants, and destroying<br />

them later, (2) physical killing by inserting a wire probe through the tunnel<br />

mouth, (3) plugging the borer hole with coal tar or (4) injecting an insecticide<br />

into the tunnel. The first depends on the occurrence of more favoured hosts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!