05.12.2012 Views

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.17 Tectona grandis (Lamiaceae) 339<br />

has a limited distribution in northwest India, has been reared successfully in<br />

the laboratory in India, released in some places in India and Myanmar during<br />

1937–40 and 1971 and found to establish successfully (Thakur, 2000).<br />

It is obvious that the parasitoids and predators must be playing an important<br />

role in keeping the population of E. machaeralis in check under natural<br />

conditions.<br />

Commercial preparations of Bacillus thuringiensis have been shown to be<br />

effective against E. machaeralis in laboratory tests (Misra and Singh, 1993;<br />

Roychoudhury et al., 1994).<br />

Chemical control Several chemical insecticides have been tested against<br />

E. machaeralis in the laboratory and found to be effective. These include<br />

monocrotophos, chlordimeform, quinalphos and formothion and the synthetic<br />

pyrethroids, cypermethrin (0.0014%), deltamethrin (0.0018%) and fenvalerate<br />

(0.0058%), with the LC50 values shown against them (Singh and Gupta, 1978;<br />

Borse and Thakur, 1993, 1994).<br />

Pheromone The sex pheromone of E. machaeralis has not been isolated.<br />

It is unlikely to be effective for control during outbreaks because of possible<br />

migration of the moths and the large numbers of moths present during<br />

outbreaks.<br />

Host plant resistance Several papers have examined the differences in<br />

susceptibility to E. machaeralis among teak clones originating from different<br />

Indian states. These are based on damage rating in laboratory feeding trials on<br />

excised leaves, or in the field on clones assembled in Germplasm Bank, or both,<br />

and the clones have been ranked according to the degree of susceptibility<br />

(Ahmad, 1991; Mishra, 1992; Meshram et al., 1994; Roychoudhury et al., 1995 a,b;<br />

Roychoudhury and Joshi, 1996; Roychoudhury et al., 1997b). A critical assessment<br />

of the methods employed and the results obtained in the above studies show<br />

that while some variability exists, there is no practically worthwhile resistance.<br />

Leaves of more susceptible clones have been shown to have a higher protein<br />

to polyphenol ratio compared to leaves of the less susceptible (Jain et al., 2000).<br />

Susceptible leaves also tend to have higher water content than less susceptible<br />

leaves (Roychoudhury et al., 1995 a,b). Under natural conditions, outbreaks<br />

normally occur late in the growth season when the leaves are mature and<br />

tough, but given the choice E. machaeralis larvae prefer to feed on younger<br />

leaves, on which the larval growth is faster and the rate of survival is higher,<br />

as noted earlier. Since the insect will accept leaves of lesser nutritional<br />

quality under natural field situations, any resistance based on subtle differences<br />

in nutritional quality that has been demonstrated in the above studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!