05.12.2012 Views

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

Contents - LAC Biosafety

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.16 Swietenia species (Meliaceae) 307<br />

without proof, that lateral shade offers a mechanical obstacle to moths in search<br />

of suitable plants for oviposition, that the slower growth of mahogany under<br />

shade makes it less attractive to the gravid moths etc. Newton et al. (1993) reviewed<br />

several instances of mixed planting of mahogany in Puerto Rico, Surinam, Brazil,<br />

Belize and Guatemala, either as enrichment planting in secondary natural forests<br />

or when planted in the open in admixture with other species, some with suitable<br />

controls. They concluded ‘growing mahoganies in mixtures with other species<br />

seems to have afforded some degree of protection’ (p. 308). They also pointed to<br />

several other mixed planting trials in Honduras and Costa Rica where shade or<br />

cover did not reduce Hypsipyla attack. Matsumoto et al. (1997) and Matsumoto and<br />

Kotulai (2000) reported that some plantations of S. macrophylla in Malaysia and<br />

Indonesia surrounded by Acacia mangium were not attacked by H. robusta.<br />

In a study of mahogany seedlings established in clearings within natural forests<br />

in Mexico, Snook and Negreros-Castillo (2004) found that in plots cleared of<br />

competing vegetation from around the seedlings, 44% of the seedlings were<br />

attacked by H. grandella, compared with 12% in uncleared plots. From the available<br />

literature, we can draw the conclusion that planting mahogany in mixture with<br />

other species does not guarantee successful Hypsipyla control, although it often<br />

does, but underplanting of mahogany in managed natural forests reduces the<br />

incidence of attack, for reasons not fully understood.<br />

Timely pruning of affected shoots to destroy the larva is another silvicultural<br />

method advocated and found effective (Cornelius, 2001).<br />

Genetic resistance It has been reported that H. grandella moths are<br />

attracted to Toona ciliata and oviposit on it, but the larvae die when they begin<br />

to feed, suggesting the presence of some toxic substance (CABI, 2005). This<br />

substance is not toxic to H. robusta which readily attacks T. ciliata in Asia and<br />

Africa where both are native. These observations suggest that there is scope for<br />

breeding for resistance to H. grandella (Newton et al., 1993).<br />

Chemical control Hypsipyla larvae concealed within shoots are inaccessible<br />

to insecticidal sprays and the infestations usually occur in the rainy period when<br />

the sprays get easily washed off the plant. Due to these reasons, conventional<br />

insecticidal application has not proved effective. To be effective, spraying needs<br />

to be carried out repeatedly to target the exposed young larvae and this is<br />

neither economically worthwhile nor ecologically acceptable. However, systemic<br />

insecticides like carbofuran applied to soil at the time of planting were found<br />

effective in field trials in Costa Rica (Newton et al., 1993). Mohanadas (2000) also<br />

reported the effectiveness of phosphamidon and dimethoate against H. robusta<br />

in field trials in India. However, the duration of effectiveness of systemic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!