A Study of a Reconnaissance Surveillance Vehicle

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Typical ISR UAV Cost Breakdown Airframe UFP Breakdown Description Cost Basis % UFP General Equipment Structures Estimate 22.74 Landing Gear Bid 1.65 Control Surf Actuation Bid 0.68 Propulsion Bid 16.31 Fuel System Estimate 0.75 Electrical Sys Estimate 1.66 Environ Ctl Sys Bid 1.02 Hydraulics Estimate 1.81 Payload SAR/GMTI Bid 23.29 Self Defense Quotation 3.22 Data Recording Quotation 0.78 Payload Mgt Quotation 0.56 Communications Bid 14.46 ESM Quotation 2.89 Avionics Avionics Estimate 3.49 Mission Specific Equipment EO/IR Bid 4.61 NPS041003 26
The HALE vehicle - (High Altitude Long Endurance) In Oct ‘94 Teledyne-Ryan was one of five remaining competing companies for the Tier II+, a contract to be awarded for a vehicle that could fly very high and remain on station for very long periods of time. Its mission was to fly at 65,000 feet (mostly out of harms way), and remain aloft for 40 hours, carrying three high quality sensors, an EO, an IR camera as well as a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imaging sensor. During the first phase of this competition each company team conducted their preliminary design and made a proposal to the DoD’s Advanced Research Projects Agency, acting as agent for the Defense Airborne Reconnaissance Office. NPS041003 27
Page 1 and 2: A Study of a Reconnaissance Surveil
Page 3 and 4: GENERAL UAV ISSUES NPS041003 3
Page 5 and 6: STRATEGIC • Worldwide OPS • Sel
Page 7 and 8: Risk Reduction • Never attempt to
Page 9 and 10: Design to Cost Lowest costs are ach
Page 11 and 12: Redundancy • Level of Redundancy
Page 13 and 14: DMS (Diminishing Mfg Sources) - Obs
Page 15 and 16: Learn from Others’ Mistakes NPS04
Page 17 and 18: Design Requirements NPS041003 17
Page 19 and 20: 50,000 Ft Steady 20Kt Crosswind Com
Page 21 and 22: System Selection NPS041003 21
Page 23 and 24: Continuous coverage Analysis Approa
Page 25: Original Design Objective Balance M
Page 29 and 30: Configuration Development NPS041003
Page 31 and 32: Loral Systems, San Jose, CA Tier II
Page 33 and 34: System Overview Wide-band data tran
Page 35 and 36: Carbon wing, tail and engine nacell
Page 37 and 38: Design Performance NPS041003 37
Page 39 and 40: Wing Lift Coefficient 1.40 1.20 1.0
Page 41 and 42: Design Implementation & Design Spec
Page 43 and 44: Navigation & Guidance Schematic NPS
Page 45 and 46: Maintainability / Accessibility Acc
Page 47 and 48: Integrated Sensor Suite NPS041003 4
Page 49 and 50: Daytime IR Imagery: March 26, 1999
Page 51 and 52: Global Hawk Airborne Integrated Com
Page 53 and 54: Air Vehicle-to-Ground Stations Inte
Page 55 and 56: All-Encompassing System Development
Page 57 and 58: . Pre-flight Checkout Remove before
Page 59 and 60: Mission Start WPt • INS alignment
Page 61 and 62: Temperature ~ Degrees F 100 60 20 -
Page 63 and 64: VN Diagram Global Hawk Vn Diagram L
Page 65 and 66: Gust Exceedance (1000 Hrs) Gust Exc
Page 67 and 68: An Example of a Flight Control HCI
Page 69 and 70: The Air Vehicle Status HCI H367-024
Page 71 and 72: Examples of Autonomous Operations N
Page 73 and 74: Post-flight Checks NPS041003 73
Page 75 and 76: Summary 1. UAVs will demonstrate lo
Page 77 and 78:
Typical Dual VMS Aircraft Loss Rate
Page 79 and 80:
Design Requirements NPS041003 79
Page 81 and 82:
Affordability UFP COTS Interchangea
Page 83 and 84:
Design Implementation & Design Spec
Page 85 and 86:
Electrical Power Schematic NPS04100
Page 87 and 88:
Vehicle Fuel System Schematic NPS04
Page 89 and 90:
Single Event Upsets >≅ 40 K Ft Co
Page 91 and 92:
AV2 -4 T urb ulence Even t.5 Altitu
Page 93 and 94:
Turbulence Event Conclusions � Fl
Page 95 and 96:
Typical Fault Logic, Lost Carrier N
Page 97 and 98:
Airspace Coordination Requirements
Page 99:
Civil Surveillance Requirements NPS
show all

A Study of a Reconnaissance Surveillance Vehicle

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?