IPCC Report.pdf - Adam Curry

Climate Change: New Dimensions in Disaster Risk, Exposure, Vulnerability, and ResilienceChapter 1IPCC, 2009. Scoping Meeting for an IPCC Special Report on Extreme Events andDisasters: Managing the Risks. Proceedings [Barros, V., et al. (eds.)]. 23-26March 2009, Oslo, Norway.ISO, 2009: Guide 73: 2009. Risk Management – Vocabulary. InternationalOrganization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Jansen, V., N. Stollenwerk, H.J. Jensen, M.E. Ramsay, W.J. Edmunds, and C.J. Rhodes,2003: Measles outbreaks in a population with declining vaccine uptake.Science, 301, 804.Jasanoff, S., 2004: States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and SocialOrder. Routledge, London, UK.Jentsch, A., J. Kreyling, and C. Beierkuhnlein, 2007: A new generation of climatechange experiments: events not trends. Frontiers in Ecology and theEnvironment, 6(6), 315-324.Jones, R.N. and B.L. Preston, 2011: Adaptation and Risk Management. WIREs ClimateChange, 2, 296-308, doi:10.1002/wcc.97.Kahan, D.M. and D. Braman, 2006: Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law andPolicy Review, 24(1), 149-172.Kahan, D.M., D. Braman, J. Gastil, P. Slovic, and C.K. Mertz, 2007: Culture and identity– protective cognition: Explaining the white male effect in risk perception.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465-505.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979: Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions underrisk. Econometrica, 47, 313-327.Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), 1982: Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.Karimi, I. and E. Hullermeier, 2007: Risk assessment system of natural hazards: Anew approach based on fuzzy probability. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 158, 987-999.Kasperson, R.E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J.Emel, R. Goble, J.X. Kasperson, andS. Ratick, 1988: The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. RiskAnalysis, 8,177-187.Kates, R.W., et al., 2001: Sustainability science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642.Keen, M., V.A. Brown, and R. Dyball, 2005: Social Learning in EnvironmentalManagement: Towards a Sustainable Future. Earthscan, London, UK.Kelman, I., 2008. Relocalising disaster risk reduction for urban resilience. UrbanDesign and Planning, 161(DP4), 197-204.Khan, T.A., 2011: Floods increase wheat yield in KP. Inpaper Magazine, Pakistan, 16May 2011.Klein, R.J.T, R.J. Nicholls, and F. Thomalla, 2003: Resilience to natural hazards: howuseful is this concept? Global Environmental Change, 5, 35-45.Knutti, R., 2010: The end of model democracy? Climatic Change, 102, 395-404.Kolb, D.A., 1984: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning andDevelopment. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Kolb, D.A. and R. Fry, 1975: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In:Theories of Group Process [Cooper, C. (ed.)]. John Wiley, London, UK, pp. 33-57.Konikow, L.F. and E. Kendy, 2005: Groundwater depletion: a global problem.Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 317-320.Kunreuther, H., 2006: Disaster mitigation and insurance: Learning from Katrina. TheAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), 208-227.Kysar, D., 2004: Climate change, cultural transformation, and comprehensiverationality. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 31(3), 555-590.Lamond, J.E., D.G. Proverbs, and F.N. Hammond, 2009: Accessibility of flood riskinsurance in the UK: confusion, competition and complacency. Journal of RiskResearch, 12, 825-841.Lau, W.K.M. and K.-M. Kim, 2011: The 2010 Pakistan flood and Russian heat wave:Teleconnection of hydrometeorologic extremes. Journal of Hydrometeorology,doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-016.1.Lavell, A., 1996: Degradación ambiental, riesgo y desastre urbano. Problemas yconceptos: hacia la definición una agenda de investigación. In: Ciudades enRiesgo [Fernandez, M.A. (ed.)]. La RED-USAID, Lima, Peru, pp. 21-59.Lavell, A., 1999: Environmental degradation, risks and urban disasters. Issues andconcepts: Towards the definition of a research agenda. In: Cities at Risk:Environmental Degradation, Urban Risks and Disasters in Latin America[Fernandez, M.A. (ed.)]. La RED, US AID, Quito, Ecuador, pp. 19-58.Lavell, A., 2002: Riesgo y Territorio: los niveles de intervención en la Gestión delRiesgo (Risk and Territory: Levels of Intervention and Risk Management).Anuario Social y Político de América Latina y el Caribe. FLACSO-NuevaSociedad, Latin American School of Social Sciences.Lavell, A., 2003: Local level risk management: Concept and practices. CEPREDENAC-UNDP. Quito, Ecuador.Lavell, A., 2009: Technical Study in Integrating Climate Change Adaptation andDisaster Risk Management in Development Planning and Policy. Studyundertaken for the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.Lavell, A., 2010: Unpacking Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster RiskManagement: Searching for the Links and the Differences: A Conceptual andEpistemological Critique and Proposal. IUCN-FLACSO, International Union forConservation of Nature - Latin American School of Social Sciences.Lavell A. and E. Franco (eds.), 1996: Estado, Sociedad y Gestión de los Desastres enAmérica Latina. Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres enAmérica Latina, La RED, Tercer Mundo Editores, Bogotá, Colombia.Lavell, A. and C. Lavell, 2009: Local Disaster Risk Reduction Lessons from the Andes.Series: Significant Local Development Initiatives in the Face of Disaster Risk.General Secretariat of the Andean Community, Lima, Peru.Leckebusch, G.C., D. Renggli, and U. Ulbrich, 2008: Development and application ofan objective storm severity measure for the Northeast Atlantic region.Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 17, 575-587.Lemos, M.C., 2003: A tale of two policies: the politics of seasonal climate forecastuse in Ceará, Brazil. Policy Sciences, 32(2), 101-123.Lemos, M.C., E. Boyd, E.L. Tompkins, H. Osbahr, and D. Liverman, 2007: Developingadaptation and adapting development. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 26,www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art26/.Lempert, R.J. and M. Collins, 2007: Managing the risk of uncertain thresholdresponses: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. RiskAnalysis, 27(4), 1009-1026.Lempert, R.J. and D.G. Groves, 2010: Identifying and evaluating robust adaptivepolicy responses to climate change for water agencies in the American west.Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 960-974.Lempert, R.J. and M. Schlesinger, 2001: Climate-change strategy needs to be robust.Nature, 412, 375.Lewcowicz, A.G. and C. Harris, 2005: Frequency and magnitude of active-layerdetachment failures in discontinuous and continuous permafrost, northernCanada. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 16,115-130.Lewis, J., 1979: The vulnerable state: An alternative view. In: Disaster Assistance:Appraisal, Reform and New Approaches [Stephens, L. and S.J. Green (eds.)].New York University Press, New York, NY, pp. 104-129.Lewis, J., 1984: Environmental interpretations of natural disaster mitigation: Thecrucial need. The Environmentalist, 4(3), pp. 177-180.Lewis, J., 1999: Development in Disaster-prone Places: Studies in Vulnerability. ITPublications (Practical Action), London, UK.Lewis, J., 2009: An island characteristic: Derivative vulnerabilities to indigenous andexogenous hazards. Shima: The International Journal of Research into IslandCultures. 3(1), 3-15.Lewis, J. and I. Kelman, 2009: Housing, flooding and risk-ecology: Thames EstuarySouth-Shoreland and North Kent. Journal of Architectural and PlanningResearch, 26(1), 14-29.Lindell, M. and C. Prater, 2003: Assessing community impacts of natural disasters.Natural Hazards Review, 4(4), 176-185.Lipton, M. and M. Ravallion, 1995: Poverty and policy. In: Handbook of DevelopmentEconomics, Vol. 3B [Behrman, J.S. and T.N. Srinivasan (eds.)]. Elsevier Science,Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford, pp. 2551-2657.List, D., 2006: Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives. Futures, 38,673-684.Loewenstein, G.F., E.U. Weber, C.K. Hsee, and E. Welch, 2001: Risk as feelings.Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.Malka, A. and J.A. Krosnick, 2009: The association of knowledge with concern aboutglobal warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. RiskAnalysis, 29, 633-647.60