04.12.2012 Views

r - part - usaid

r - part - usaid

r - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

cost of running them, Without additional facilities, a drill<br />

rig has a storage capacity of 756 liters of fuel. At an assumed<br />

rate of consumptian of 300 liters per day while drill.ing (50<br />

likers per hour fur 6 hours), this lasts snfy two and a half<br />

days. In the Bay Region, where distances are nut sa great and<br />

where road conditions are generally better, one fuel truck can<br />

service three rigs, In the Central Range, one fuel truck is<br />

req~ired<br />

for each rig.<br />

The same rationale appzies to the fact that while one water<br />

truck is required for each rig in the Bay Region, two are needed<br />

for each rig in the Central Range, One of these two is based at<br />

the site and used as a stationary starage facility, necessary<br />

because the distance to the nearest water supply may be as far<br />

as seventy-Eivs kilometers.<br />

The equivalent of cne heavy truck is required for each rig<br />

operating in the Bay Region. This represents one knuckle-crane<br />

truck and one flat-bed truck, each shared between two rigs, In<br />

the Central Range the knuckle-crane truck is required to be on<br />

site far the whole time. In most circumstances in the Central<br />

Ra1':ge n flat-bed truck, which is only used to deliver ampplies,<br />

could still be shared between two rigs,<br />

As demonstrated in the BranAon analysis, one obviaus<br />

conclusian fron the above data is that the rate of drilling is<br />

of paramount iaportance. The Groundwater Project has achieved<br />

an overall averzge of 36 working days at each rotary rig<br />

borehole [ap~zaximately 100 borehales in 4 years by 3 rigs).<br />

Not infrequently, however, the drilling crews have completed<br />

their task at the site and moved on within 10 days- The<br />

vzriance about this mean is obviously high. It is not at a11<br />

unusual far WDB drilling crews noh u~>rking an the project to<br />

spend six months or even a f-ll year at one site. In some<br />

cases, this may be the rsault of the slow rate of drilling of<br />

the older cable t asP rigs; it can more often be attributed to<br />

mechanical breakdown or lack of supplies, <strong>part</strong>icularly fuel.<br />

In very simple terms, a rig costing $400,000, with an<br />

expected life of 10 years, drilling 8 boreholes each year,<br />

shouzd charge $5,000 far each borehole for capital recovery<br />

costs. The same rig drilling one borehoie every six months w ill<br />

need to charge $20,000 for each borehole. The answer to this<br />

difficult costing question lies not in desig~ing a costing<br />

system to deal with it, but in maintaining z high drilling rate,<br />

Economies on equipm~gt maintenance and supplies of fuel are, fn<br />

fact, false ecsnoaies.<br />

In a separate calculation, reproduced in Table 2.4.7, the<br />

cost of an idle drilling team operating a production drilling<br />

program in the Bay Region has been calculat-ed at $365 per day.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!