04.12.2012 Views

r - part - usaid

r - part - usaid

r - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

arrives at an equivalent figure rznging from $83,970 for the Bay<br />

region to $131,435 far the Central Range (Table 2.4.4). This<br />

major eifference relates to the treatment of capital costs, and<br />

deserves some explanation.<br />

e Brandon arialysis attempted to forecast the cost of<br />

continuing the Comprehensive Groundwater Development Project<br />

through to the end of the expected life of the most expensive<br />

equipment, the drilling rigs- Wherever possible, the cost of<br />

expatriates was excluded. Hawever, the analysis was unable to<br />

separate out the overhead capital costs associated with the<br />

element of training and supemision built into the project by<br />

the inclusion of expatriates. As an example, it is now felt<br />

that maintaining an inventory af 40 light vehicles, ox even 32,<br />

to support the operation of four drilling rigs would be somewhat<br />

excessive (Brandun,1984, p-13). Less vehicles are able to<br />

service a larger number of active drilling teams.<br />

In the light of experience, the projected life of many of<br />

the vehicles appears to have been a rather conservative<br />

estimate, certainky for uper~tions in the Bay Region.<br />

Estimating the life of vehicles in Somalia can be a difficult<br />

exercise. On the one hand, the terrain, eopecialfy far those<br />

vehicles operating in the Central Range, is very rough, and the<br />

standard of driving and the level of naintena~ce is not of an<br />

optimum level. On the other hand, fazed w ith the difficulty of<br />

acquiring spare <strong>part</strong>s, Somali ingenuity keeps a large number of<br />

vehicles operating far longer khan mfghr be expected.<br />

W i t h the establishment of t5e Planning Unit, and the<br />

introduction of micro-computers, it was decided to create a new<br />

costing model. At the same time, it became increasingly obvious<br />

that USAID did not propose to coztinue funding the Groundwater<br />

project in its existing form beyond the current extension<br />

period. In order to retain the benefits of continuity by<br />

keeping t'the projectw operati~g as a unit, WDA proposed that the<br />

facilities be ~ sed far an exploratory drilling program to cover<br />

the whole of Somalia. With this in mind, zhe ccsting model was<br />

designed to serve the brcader costing needs of WDA as well as<br />

being able to focus on the operations of the Groundwater<br />

project .<br />

Construction<br />

The well construction mdel consists of 26 tables, an6 is<br />

reproduced in fall in this report in sno versions. Appendix<br />

4.4.1 represents the cost of a prsduction drilling program in<br />

the Bay region, Appendix 4 - 4 2 represents the cost of an<br />

exploratory drilling program in the central aangelands. The<br />

difference I s in the primary objective of the program: the Bay<br />

Region production drilling prograa inccrporates some aspect of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!