r - part - usaid
r - part - usaid
r - part - usaid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
arrives at an equivalent figure rznging from $83,970 for the Bay<br />
region to $131,435 far the Central Range (Table 2.4.4). This<br />
major eifference relates to the treatment of capital costs, and<br />
deserves some explanation.<br />
e Brandon arialysis attempted to forecast the cost of<br />
continuing the Comprehensive Groundwater Development Project<br />
through to the end of the expected life of the most expensive<br />
equipment, the drilling rigs- Wherever possible, the cost of<br />
expatriates was excluded. Hawever, the analysis was unable to<br />
separate out the overhead capital costs associated with the<br />
element of training and supemision built into the project by<br />
the inclusion of expatriates. As an example, it is now felt<br />
that maintaining an inventory af 40 light vehicles, ox even 32,<br />
to support the operation of four drilling rigs would be somewhat<br />
excessive (Brandun,1984, p-13). Less vehicles are able to<br />
service a larger number of active drilling teams.<br />
In the light of experience, the projected life of many of<br />
the vehicles appears to have been a rather conservative<br />
estimate, certainky for uper~tions in the Bay Region.<br />
Estimating the life of vehicles in Somalia can be a difficult<br />
exercise. On the one hand, the terrain, eopecialfy far those<br />
vehicles operating in the Central Range, is very rough, and the<br />
standard of driving and the level of naintena~ce is not of an<br />
optimum level. On the other hand, fazed w ith the difficulty of<br />
acquiring spare <strong>part</strong>s, Somali ingenuity keeps a large number of<br />
vehicles operating far longer khan mfghr be expected.<br />
W i t h the establishment of t5e Planning Unit, and the<br />
introduction of micro-computers, it was decided to create a new<br />
costing model. At the same time, it became increasingly obvious<br />
that USAID did not propose to coztinue funding the Groundwater<br />
project in its existing form beyond the current extension<br />
period. In order to retain the benefits of continuity by<br />
keeping t'the projectw operati~g as a unit, WDA proposed that the<br />
facilities be ~ sed far an exploratory drilling program to cover<br />
the whole of Somalia. With this in mind, zhe ccsting model was<br />
designed to serve the brcader costing needs of WDA as well as<br />
being able to focus on the operations of the Groundwater<br />
project .<br />
Construction<br />
The well construction mdel consists of 26 tables, an6 is<br />
reproduced in fall in this report in sno versions. Appendix<br />
4.4.1 represents the cost of a prsduction drilling program in<br />
the Bay region, Appendix 4 - 4 2 represents the cost of an<br />
exploratory drilling program in the central aangelands. The<br />
difference I s in the primary objective of the program: the Bay<br />
Region production drilling prograa inccrporates some aspect of