r - part - usaid
r - part - usaid
r - part - usaid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
uperatfons and aaintanance. Copies sf this report will also be<br />
sent ta the pump operator and the coa'c"uunity water committee.<br />
Evaluations will be conducted in each target area<br />
approximately ona year after purzipiag apetations begin. This<br />
report wflf be sent to and disc~sseb with the pump operatar and<br />
the comunity water comittee. The ZriEomation from each<br />
cumunity will be analyzed and sumasized annually and used to<br />
prepare a regional evaluation repcrt. These reports will be<br />
sent to a23 relevant agencies invalved in project inplemantatfon<br />
and planning*<br />
The Eoliowlng sections present the results of an evaluation<br />
of eleven well oites cohducted as past of the process to develop<br />
a monitoring and evaluation system. The presentation also<br />
illustrates Bany ways in which the daZa can be tabulated,<br />
coaparsd, aad analyzed.<br />
3.8. Monitarinp and Evaluation Survey Results<br />
This section is a sumary ~i monitoring and evaluation<br />
surveys conducted in nine comaunities with CGPP wal3.s- Some<br />
data is reported for the Central Rangelands, but the report,<br />
concentrates on the situation xn ten Bay Region conuaunitizs.<br />
The research was doze on an intermittent basis betwean July 1985<br />
znd Masch 3986, and included severr field visits which lasted<br />
from four to ten da;s. Five visits weso directed by L3IE<br />
consultants and two were carried out i~dependently by a member<br />
cf the Planning Gnit staff. The CGDP conducted mast drilling<br />
activities in the Bay Regfdn and this eaphasfs is reflected in<br />
the sociaecenomic i~vostigatians.<br />
Tva me*srs of the BRAD2 Manitorri=.,g Unit <strong>part</strong>icipated in an<br />
evaluztion of well site villages in the Bay Region. The<br />
original Work ffan a~ticfpatee a Larger amaunt 05 field time,<br />
bat the lack of WDA staff, and the fact that BRADP personnel<br />
were not avaiLaSle until Harch 1985, reduced the scale and<br />
intensity of the evaluations.<br />
field methods 21.-clrrded The ad~inistratian of several survey<br />
farms, observatiors of physical conditio3s and patterns of water<br />
use, inte,rviews with the pup operators, and group discussions<br />
with local leaders and menbers of water coznnittees. Informal<br />
interviews were held with individuals using the wells, and data<br />
were obtained from a Water System Record Book that had been<br />
completed for two mcntha in one village. Baseline information<br />
was generated froa sacioecanomic szudies conducted by LBZI<br />
cunsultants {Roark 1982, 19831, Wyonfng Cniversity (19841, the<br />
Hunting report (1982) and in restr~spective interviews during