16.07.2015 Views

View/Open - Makerere University Institutional Repository

View/Open - Makerere University Institutional Repository

View/Open - Makerere University Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Attitudes of out-of-school youthsDiscov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)Attitudes of Out-of-School Youths towards Tree PlantingActivities in Central Uganda: A Case Study of MasakaDistrictJacob Godfrey Agea 1, 2 *, Susan Nansereko 3 , Joseph Obua 2 , Daniel Waiswa 2, 4 , MukadasiBuyinza 2 and Fred Yikii 21School of Environment and Natural Resources, <strong>University</strong> of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK2Faculty of Forestry and Nature Conservation, <strong>Makerere</strong> <strong>University</strong>, P.O. Box 7062 Kampala, Uganda3National Forestry Resources Research Institute, P.O. Box 1752Kampala Uganda4College of Natural Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State <strong>University</strong>, Virginia USA*Corresponding author. E-mail: agea@forest.mak.ac.ug or j.g.agea@bangor.ac.ukAbstractThis study assessed the attitudes of out-of-school youths towards tree planting activities in Masaka district, centralUganda. Data were collected using 104 semi-structured questionnaires. Logistic regression was used to show theinfluence of demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents on their attitudes towards treeplanting. Summative attitudes index varied from 320 for those who liked very much tree planting activities to 6 forthose who disliked very much tree planting activities. Opinions on willingness to plant and tender trees also variedwidely from summative index of 305 for those who would very much plant and manage the trees to 5 for those whowould very much not plant and manage the trees. Sex, age, education, occupation, distance to the nearest tradingcentre and land ownership significantly contributed to variation in the attitudes. Factors such as lack of capital;land and tree tenure security; long payback period from planted trees; bad beliefs, taboos and superstitions aboutcertain trees hindered out-of-school youths’ efforts. There is a need to develop clear policies and by-laws to guideand induce the out-of-school youths to plant trees as a livelihood opportunity.Key words: Youths, school dropouts, tree planting, forestry, UgandaRésuméCette étude a évalué l’attitude des jeunes qui ont abandonné leurs études vis-à-vis les activités de sylvieculturedans le district de Masaka, situé dans le centre de l’Ouganda. Les données ont été recueillies au moyen de 104questionnaires semi-structurés. La régression logistique a été utilisée pour montrer l’influence des facteursdémographiques et socio-économiques des personnes interrogées sur leurs attitudes à l’égard de la plantationd’arbres. L’indice sommatif des attitudes a varié de 320 pour ceux qui aimaient beaucoup les activités sylvicultureà 6, pour ceux qui n’aiment pas beaucoup. Les opinions sur la volonté de planter et soigner des arbres étaientégalement variées avec un indice sommatif allant de 305 pour ceux qui apprécient beaucoup s’occuper d’arbres à5 pour ceux qui n’en voulaient pas du tout. Les facteurs ayant contribué à ce phénomène sont entre autres le sexe,l’âge, l’éducation, l’occupation des jeunes, la distance du plus proche centre commercial ainsi que la propriétéfoncière. Tous ces facteurs ont contribué de manière significative à la variation dans les attitudes. Des facteurstels que le manque de capitaux, la terre et la sécurité en matière de propriété des arbres, de longues périodesde récupération des arbres plantées; croyances négatives, des superstitions et des tabous sur certains arbres ontentravé les efforts desdits jeunes. Il ya un besoin de développer des politiques et des règlements visant à guideret inciter les jeunes ayant abandonné l’école à planter des arbres comme un moyen d’améliorer leur situationéconomique.Mots clés: Jeunes, abandon des études, sylviculture, foresterie, OugandaIntroductionThe definition of a youth is very confusing. Differentcountries, organizations and scholars have provideddifferent ways of defining youth. Curtain (2003),quoted in the U.N. World Youth Report 2003,defines it as a phase when a person moves from atime of dependence (childhood) to independence(adulthood) and identifies four distinct aspectsof this movement: leaving the parental home and111


Discov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)Attitudes of out-of-school youthsestablishing new living arrangements; completingfull-time education; forming close, stable personalrelationships outside of the family, often resulting inmarriage and children; and testing the labor market,finding work and possibly settling into a career,and achieving a more or less sustainable livelihood.Curtain (2003) stressed that these transitions areinterconnected. Leaving home and setting up one’sown personal economy requires an independentsource of income, and to reach this stage, a youngperson generally has to have acquired qualificationsand also succeeded in demonstrating his or her skillin the labor market.In Uganda, youths are defined as all youngpersons between the ages of 18–30 years (NationalYouths Council Statute, 1993; The 1995 constitution ofRepublic of Uganda). Youths present an opportunityfor sustained efforts to participate in the country’sdevelopment process because they possess greaterenergy, workforce and potential.In Uganda, and indeed in any developingcountry, the population structures are usually ‘young’with the youth, adolescents and children comprisingthe majority of the population (Population Censusof 2002; Population Reference Bureau, 2005). Youthsand young people (Population Census of, 2002)constitute 78% of Uganda’s population, which isabout 27 Million people. Of these 78%, out-of-schoolyouths make up well over 50% (Ndyanabangi et al.,2004).Out-of-school youths have little access toinformation, are often intimidated, lackself-confidence and also often are reluctant toask questions in public sessions when they do notunderstand something (Topouzis, 1994). Out-ofschoolyouths contribute the highest number ofunemployed people in the country (The New Vision12 th August, 2003; Population Reference Bureau, 2006).This unemployment has resulted into many of themliving in abject poverty. Additionally, unemploymenthas led to rampant rural-urban migration, increasedidleness, manipulation and vulnerability to abusessuch as unfair labour exploitation, sexual harassmentand recruitment into political armed rebel groups(The New Vision 21 st August, 2003).While both government and non-governmentorganizations in Uganda have tried to pioneerprograms to address the broad range of socialand economic problems of out-of-school youths,inadequate resources have restricted them fromregistering remarkable success. Thus the problem ofunemployment amongst the youths, especially thoseout of schools is still crucial (The New Vision 1 st May,2003). The idea of tree planting as one of the strategiesto engage youths gainfully by the governmentof Ugandan dates way back in the colonial dayswhen government through Forest Department (FD)launched several tree planting campaigns (Jacoveliand Carvalho, 1995).Today, government and non-governmentalorganizations are still advocating for tree planting.New paradigms have also been developed toenhance peoples’ participation in tree plantingactivities such as Agroforestry and CommunityForestry. However, majority of the people especiallythe youths have not taken this seriously; theyhave continuously minimized and overlookedforestry and its related enterprises (National ForestAuthority, 2005). What discourages youths frominvesting in tree planting is unclear and yet Ugandais endowed with a conducive climate for tree growth(Hamilton, 1984). This study, therefore, assessed theattitudes of out-of school youths and their level ofparticipation in tree planting activities; determinedtheir level of awareness about the roles and values oftrees; and identified their perceived constraints andopportunities to tree planting activities.MethodologyThe study was conducted in Kalungu sub-county inMasaka district, central Uganda. Kalungu is locatedbetween 30°3´–31°3´E and 0°15´–0°30´S (MDSOER,1997) with an average altitude of 115 m above sealevel. The area has small hills with undulating slopesup to about 1000m above sea level (MDSOER, 1997).The area has a bi-modal rainfall regime with clearlymarked wet and dry seasons. The temperature ismoderately high with a minimum of about 18°C anda maximum of about 30°C. The soils are generallysandy to loam with high erosive potential. About80% of the total population derive their livelihoodfrom subsistence farming.Data on the attitudes of out-of school youths,level of participation in tree planting activities,awareness about the roles of trees, perceivedconstraints and opportunities to tree plantingactivities were gathered through a semi-structuredquestionnaire survey, with the help of two researchassistants. All the research assistants were universitygraduates and were trained to administer thequestionnaire in a face-to-face approach. Questionswere written in English language, but weresometimes asked in the local language depending onthe education background of the out-of-school youthbeing interviewed. Prior to the survey, a pilot surveywas conducted with the two research assistants in oneparish to test the completeness of the questionnaire.After this survey, some questions were modified toimprove on their clarity.In total, 104 out-of-school youths wereinterviewed in Kalungu sub-county. The sub-countywas stratified into ten administrative units (parishes)and a minimum of 10 out-of-school youths wereselected from each administrative unit (parish)relative to the size of the population of out-of-schoolyouths in that parish. Lists of out-of-school youthswere obtained from the parish offices. Respondentswere then selected randomly by lottery from eachparish and were interviewed. The questionnaireincluded both fixed-response and open-endedquestions. The latter were included to facilitate opendiscussion with respondents. The opinions of the112


Attitudes of out-of-school youthsDiscov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)out-of-school youths towards tree planting activitieswere assessed based on a five-point Likert scale, withthe possible answers ranging from very positive (=5), to neutral (= 3), to very negative (= 1) responses(Likert, 1974).Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)version 12.0 (Norusis, 2004) was used to analysethe responses. Validity of the Likert attitude scalewas tested by computing the correlation betweenresponses to individual statements and the sum ofresponses to all statements (Shrigley and Trueblood,1979). Item responses were summed to create ascore (attitude index) for a group of items. Logisticregression (Green, 1995) was used to determinewhether demographic and socio-economic variablesexplained out-of-school youth attitudes. The factorsexamined as independent variables were: (1) sex, (2)age, (3) marital status, (4) education, (5) occupation,(6) origin, (7) distance to the nearest tradingcentre, (8) land ownership, and (9) method of landacquisition. Because binary variables are used inlogistic regression, the dependent variable, namelythe attitude level score, was recorded as a dummyvariable with two categories divided at the median.Independent variables were also recorded as dummyvariables, each with two categories.ResultsDemographic and socio-economiccharacteristics of respondentsThe demographic and socio-economic characteristicsof the out-of school-youths interviewed are presentedin Table 1. The majority (58%) of the out-of school-Table 1. Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the respondents (N = 104)Variables % Variables %SexOriginMale 70 Native 86Female 30 Immigrant 14AgeCurrent occupation18-24 42 Small-scale farming 5325-30 58 Small business 30Religion Unemployed 17Catholic 66 Land ownershipMuslim 23 Own landProtestant 7 Do not own land 29Others (Pentecostals, Adventists) 4 Land acquisition method 71Education backgroundInheritedNon-formal 21 Purchased 20Formal (primary, secondary,vocational)79 Given 37Marital status Distance of home to the nearest trading centre (km) 43Single 64 < 10 76Married 36 > 10 24Table 2. Attitudes of out-of- school youths towards tree planting activities (N = 104)Variable/question % response Attitude indexDo you like or dislike the tree planting activities?I like them very much 62 320I like them somewhat 21 88Indifferent to opinion about liking or disliking tree planting activities 5 25I dislike them somewhat 7 14I dislike them very much 6 6Would you plant and managed trees if you were given free seedlings?I would very much plant and manage them 59 305I would somewhat plant and manage them 25 104Indifferent to opinion about planting and managing them 3 15I would somewhat not plant and manage them 9 18I would very much not plant and manage them 5 5113


Attitudes of out-of-school youthsDiscov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)activities as a result of sex was 0.14 indicating thattheir probability of planting trees increases by 14% ifthe person is a female youth.The level of education positively influenced theattitudes and willingness of out-of-school youthstowards tree planting activities (P = 0.05, R = 0.21). Outof-schoolyouths with formal education are expectedto have positive attitude and be more willing to engagein tree planting activities than the uneducated ones.The marginal effect of 0.20 implies that there is a 20%greater chance of liking tree planting tree activitiesif the youths had formal education. The marginalchange on the attitudes to tree planting activities asa result of occupational status is 0.22, implying that ifthe out-of-school youth is a farmer, the probability ofplanting trees increases by 22%.The age of the youths influenced attitudes andwillingness to engage in tree planting activities (P= 0.05). Youths who were 25 years and above weremore willing to plant trees than their counterpartsbelow 25 years. Youths who live within 10 km fromthe nearest trading centres were more unwilling toplant trees as compared to those living far awayfrom trading centres. The marginal change on thewillingness to plant trees and tender trees as aresult of owning land was 0.19, implying that theprobability of planting trees by out-of-school youthswho own land increases by 19%. Marital status, originand method of land acquisition did not significantlyinfluence the attitudes and willingness of out-ofschoolyouths towards tree planting activities.Awareness of out-of-school youths about theroles and values of treesThe level of knowledge or awareness of the rolesand values of trees by the out-of-school youths wasexamined using a statement that they were asked torate on the 1 to 5 Likert Scale (Table 5). The summativeindex of the level of knowledge/awareness variedfrom 335 for those who were very knowledgeable to4 for those who were not knowledgeable about theroles and values of the trees in their vicinity. Majority(Table 5) of the out-of-school youths said trees aresources of fuelwood, charcoal, timber for constructionand sale, fodder, local medicines, fencing postsand poles for construction. Other major roles andvalues of trees perceived by these youths includedmodification of micro-climates; shade for shadedesiringcrops, animals and for people at home; rawmaterial for utensils like mortars and pestles, drums,and production of fruits.Table 5. Awareness about the roles and values of trees by out-of-school youths (N =104)VariableAttitude index/ %responseKnowledge of roles and values of treesAttitude indexVery knowledgeable 335Knowledgeable 92Somewhat knowledgeable 18Slightly knowledgeable 8Not knowledgeable 4Roles/uses of trees% responseFirewood for domestic use and for sale 83Charcoal for sale 79Source of local medicines 77Timber for construction and for sale 69Modification of micro-climates 60Fencing materials like posts 56Poles for construction 56Shade for shade-loving crops, animals, for people at home 50Raw material for utensils like mortar and pestles, drums 48Production of fruits 43Shelterbelt and wind breaks 37Bark cloth and other fibres 28Production of fodder for domestic animals 24Source of forage for honeybees 22Soil conservation 14Ornamental/beauty 13115


Discov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)Attitudes of out-of-school youthsTable 6. Opportunities and constraints to tree planting by out-of-school youths (N =104)Variable % responseConstraintsLack of capital 68Land and tree tenure insecurity 63Long pay-back period from planted trees 56Bad beliefs, taboos and superstitions about planting certain trees 48Lack of quality planting materials 47Tree pests and diseases 44Ignorance of market dynamics 27Abnormally long dry spells (drought) 25Competing uses for land, labour and capital 22Lack interest in tree planting 19OpportunitiesEnabling government policies to tree planting activities 61Increasing government commitment to youths welfare 59Increasing extension services 54Conducive climatic conditions for tree growth 52Availability of local market for tree products 45Land availability 38Availability of cheap labour 38Constraints and opportunities to tree plantingactivities by out-of-school youthsA number of factors hindered tree-plantingactivities by out-of-school youths in Kalungusub-county, Masaka district. Lack of capital;land and tree tenure insecurity; long pay-backperiod from planted trees; bad beliefs, taboos andsuperstitions about planting certain trees, lackof quality planting materials; and ignorance ofmarket dynamics were the major hindrance (Table6). Other challenges included unusually long dryspells (drought); competing uses for land, labourand capital; and lack of interest in tree planting. Inspite of these numerous constraints, there are stillopportunities for out-of-school youths to planttrees in Kalungu sub-county. The opportunitiesincluded the enabling government policies totree planting activities; increasing governmentcommitment to youth’s welfare; increasingsupport by extension institutions; conduciveclimatic conditions for tree growth as well asexpanding markets for tree products (Table 6).DiscussionGiven that tree growing by youths is an enterprisesubject to risky events such as drought, an importantfactor in understanding the behavior and decisions ofyouths to engage in such enterprise is their attitudes.The findings presented in this study, therefore, clearlyindicates that out-of-school youths interested in treeplanting activities accounted for an extremely largesegment of the respondents. Interest in tree plantingappeared to be particularly high among the older andmore educated youths. Agea et al. (2005) and Obua etal. (1998) reported that education increases people’senvironmental awareness, appreciation of the valueof trees and people’s ability to communicate. Thepositive tendencies towards tree planting couldperhaps also be as result of perceived roles of treesin the environment and their livelihoods such asprovision of fuelwood and timber for domestic useand sale.On the other hand, youths who live in or neartrading centres were more unwilling to plant treesas compared to those living far away from tradingcentres. Youths by their nature tend to prefer quick andhigher wage employment which is more accessiblein urban areas. Unfortunately, not all of them whoseek employment in urban areas get the jobs. Themajority of them “can only secure low-paying jobssuch as domestic, factory and commercial enterprise(e.g. bars, hotels and restaurants) workers, clericalpositions and prostitution. A few are engaged inpetty trade while others ride bicycles and transportpassengers and their luggage in a business calledboda-boda. Therefore, such youths leaving in urbanareas do not see any point of planting trees as asource of livelihood.The findings also indicated that many out-ofschoolyouths participated in tree planting activitiesat individual household level, implying that youthsfavour private individual tree plantings, rather thanfocussing their attention to schools, communal,116


Discov. Innov., 2009; 21(1&2)Attitudes of out-of-school youthsLikert, R. 1974. A method of constructing an attitude scale.In: Scaling: A Sourcebook for Behavioural Scientists, ed.G.M. Maranell, pp. 233–243. Chicago, USA: AldinePublishing Company.MDSOER. 1997. Masaka District State of EnvironmentReport. National Environmental ManagementAuthority, Kampala Uganda.National Forest Authority. 2005. Draft Annual Report2004/2005: Planting, growing and protecting trees.Kampala, Uganda.Ndyanabangi, B., Kipp, W. and Diesfeld, H.J. 2004.Reproductive Health Behaviour among In-School andOut-of-School Youths in Kabarole District, Uganda.African Journal of Reproductive Health, 8(3): 55–67.Norusis, M. 2004. SPSS 12.0 Guide to Data Analysis. PrenticeHall.Obua, J., Banana, A.Y. and Turyahabwe, N. 1998. Attitudesof local communities towards forest managementpractices in Uganda: The case of Budongo forestreserve. Commonwealth Forestry review, 77(2).Population Reference Bureau. 2006. The World’s YouthsData Sheet. Washington, USA.Semana, A.R. and Kibwika, P. 2000. Identification ofExisting Rural Youths Activities and Proposal forDATIC Support to Rural Youths Activity. NARO/DANIDA, Kampala.Shrigley, R.L. and Trueblood, C.R. 1979. Designing a Likerttypescale to assess attitude toward metrication. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 16(1): 73–78.The New Vision 1 st May. 2003. International Labour DaySupplement. Main Library <strong>Makerere</strong> <strong>University</strong>,Kampala Uganda.The New Vision 21 st August. 2003. International YouthsDay Supplement. Main Library <strong>Makerere</strong> <strong>University</strong>,Kampala Uganda.The Republic of Uganda. 1993. The National YouthsCouncil Statute. Kampala Uganda.The Republic of Uganda. 1995. Constitution of the Republicof Uganda. Entebbe: Government Printer.Topouzis, D. 1994. The Socio-Economic Impact of HIV/AIDS on Rural Families with Emphasis on Youths.Rome: FAO.Uganda Population and Housing Census. 2002. Bureau ofStatistics, Goverenment Printery, Entebbe Uganda.118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!