State-Of-Black-Oregon-2015
State-Of-Black-Oregon-2015
State-Of-Black-Oregon-2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ESSAY 13THIS IS GENTRIFICATIONLisa K. Bates, PhDAssociate Professor, Toulan School of Urban Studies & Planning; and<strong>Black</strong> Studies, Portland <strong>State</strong> UniversityPortland’s planning has been held upnationwide and internationally as theepitome of sustainability and urbanlivability. Our “emerging” and “up-andcoming”N and NE neighborhoods are cited asvibrant. But for <strong>Black</strong> Portlanders, this planning“success” just continues a history of displacementand disenfranchisement. Memorial Coliseum.The Minnesota Freeway. Emanuel Hospital. I-5.Long-time <strong>Black</strong> Portlanders can point to formerhomes and businesses as they run down thelitany of sites.During what we think of as the “bad old days”of urban planning, <strong>Black</strong> neighborhoods wereoften under threat from the bulldozer. Urbanrenewal was premised on stopping the spreadof blight—with slum clearance tearing downbuildings for real estate development andhighway construction. Community opponentsoften called it “Negro removal.” In effect, <strong>Black</strong>people were seen as a problem, and urbanrenewal as its solution. The presence of <strong>Black</strong>communities in substandard housing justifieda blight designation. These practices didn’taddress the structural causes of racializedpoverty, poor-quality housing and segregation;they simply eliminated the problem people froma valuable location.It’s now widely recognized that these practiceswere counterproductive. Many locations—like theWilliams Avenue lots, vacant for decades—werenever profitably redeveloped.More important, these actions deepened raceand class inequality by destabilizing <strong>Black</strong>families and communities. The results included:losing property, related to the massive racialwealth gap; “root shock,” caused by displacementfrom homes and neighborhoods and linkedto a variety of negative health outcomes; andseparation from economic opportunities. Urbanrenewal’s large-scale clearance has passed, butthe underlying concept remains an urban policyassumption—neighborhoods are fixed whenthey’re remade for new people.Even without government-sponsoreddemolitions, many <strong>Black</strong>s are now experiencingdéjà vu. An estimated 10,000 <strong>Black</strong> peoplehave moved out of N/NE Portland. Many weredisplaced involuntarily from their homes by:rising rents; properties converted from rentedto owned; or foreclosure. 1 With no majority<strong>Black</strong> neighborhood left in Portland, today’sdemographic changes are more completethan the old “Negro removal” ever was inmoving <strong>Black</strong> people away from desirable andpotentially valuable locations.This is gentrification: fundamentally changingthe character of neighborhoods as those witheconomic means and racial privilege outbuyexisting residents. Unlike the days of bulldozersand red lines on bank maps, it can be difficultto identify the actors on the scene. Publicinvestments are framed as community benefits;equity goals are set in community plans;eminent domain is no longer the primary toolfor development; and “social sustainability” is abuzzword.Policymakers and real estate interests have a new134