The Use of Opposites in Literature

The Use of Opposites in Literature The Use of Opposites in Literature

13.07.2015 Views

Nutting 1Karen NuttingT. L. PagaardEngl122/077818 December 2000The Use of Opposites in LiteratureJust as an artist uses darkness in order to show light in a painting, writers useopposites in literature to tell their stories. The artist uses contrast to draw the eye wherehe wants the viewer to look. The writer uses such tools as juxtaposition and characterfoils to engage the reader’s attention and to deliver meaning. Contrast serves many purposesin the literary experience. It causes the reader’s emotions to become involved. Itoften persuades the reader to make choices as he or she lives through the dilemma a protagonistfaces in a story. It allows the reader to see both sides of a coin for more completeunderstanding. In many of the reading selections this semester contrast is used to heightenthe impact of the story. Some of these selections include the short stories “RomanFever,” “In Exile,” and “Greenleaf.” There are also the characterizations of Gregor and hisfamily in Franz Kafka’s novella Metamorphosis. We see contrast in the poems “Curiosity”by Alastair Reed and Robert Frost’s “The Road Not Taken.” We even contemplate theopposing politics of the Czech Republic in Vaclav Havel’s play Unveiling.Character foils are the most common and effective way a writer can show a contrast—ormore important, a dilemma. The dilemma shows the human side of a characterand allows the reader to compare the experience of the story to some aspect of her or hisown life. On a larger scale, opposing personalities are a means for the author to depicthuman nature or the frailty of the human spirit, especially if the protagonist is facingdifficult choices. Some good examples of character foils come from the short fiction selectionsthis semester. In Edith Wharton’s “Roman Fever” the use of characterization showsthe disparity between two women, Ms. Slade and Ms. Ansley, who share a common pastand the affections of Mr. Slade. Aside from the use of the two women as character foils,

Nutt<strong>in</strong>g 1Karen Nutt<strong>in</strong>gT. L. PagaardEngl122/077818 December 2000<strong>The</strong> <strong>Use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Opposites</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Literature</strong>Just as an artist uses darkness <strong>in</strong> order to show light <strong>in</strong> a pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g, writers useopposites <strong>in</strong> literature to tell their stories. <strong>The</strong> artist uses contrast to draw the eye wherehe wants the viewer to look. <strong>The</strong> writer uses such tools as juxtaposition and characterfoils to engage the reader’s attention and to deliver mean<strong>in</strong>g. Contrast serves many purposes<strong>in</strong> the literary experience. It causes the reader’s emotions to become <strong>in</strong>volved. It<strong>of</strong>ten persuades the reader to make choices as he or she lives through the dilemma a protagonistfaces <strong>in</strong> a story. It allows the reader to see both sides <strong>of</strong> a co<strong>in</strong> for more completeunderstand<strong>in</strong>g. In many <strong>of</strong> the read<strong>in</strong>g selections this semester contrast is used to heightenthe impact <strong>of</strong> the story. Some <strong>of</strong> these selections <strong>in</strong>clude the short stories “RomanFever,” “In Exile,” and “Greenleaf.” <strong>The</strong>re are also the characterizations <strong>of</strong> Gregor and hisfamily <strong>in</strong> Franz Kafka’s novella Metamorphosis. We see contrast <strong>in</strong> the poems “Curiosity”by Alastair Reed and Robert Frost’s “<strong>The</strong> Road Not Taken.” We even contemplate theoppos<strong>in</strong>g politics <strong>of</strong> the Czech Republic <strong>in</strong> Vaclav Havel’s play Unveil<strong>in</strong>g.Character foils are the most common and effective way a writer can show a contrast—ormore important, a dilemma. <strong>The</strong> dilemma shows the human side <strong>of</strong> a characterand allows the reader to compare the experience <strong>of</strong> the story to some aspect <strong>of</strong> her or hisown life. On a larger scale, oppos<strong>in</strong>g personalities are a means for the author to depicthuman nature or the frailty <strong>of</strong> the human spirit, especially if the protagonist is fac<strong>in</strong>gdifficult choices. Some good examples <strong>of</strong> character foils come from the short fiction selectionsthis semester. In Edith Wharton’s “Roman Fever” the use <strong>of</strong> characterization showsthe disparity between two women, Ms. Slade and Ms. Ansley, who share a common pastand the affections <strong>of</strong> Mr. Slade. Aside from the use <strong>of</strong> the two women as character foils,


Nutt<strong>in</strong>g 2Wharton uses the images <strong>of</strong> light and dark to represent the contrast theme <strong>of</strong> the story.<strong>The</strong>se two women are different <strong>in</strong> looks as well as actions. Ms. Slade is a brunette and Ms.Ansley is blonde. <strong>The</strong>ir personalities are opposite too: Ms. Ansley is quiet and reservedwhile Ms. Slade is a lively socialite. <strong>The</strong> author’s descriptions <strong>of</strong> the scenery enhance themood <strong>of</strong> the conversation the women are shar<strong>in</strong>g. When the conversation is light and trivialthey gaze at the light <strong>of</strong> the Palat<strong>in</strong>e. As tension between them <strong>in</strong>creases, they lookaway toward the darkened Forum, an arena <strong>of</strong> great argument and conflict, and f<strong>in</strong>ally tothe grim Colosseum. <strong>The</strong> women’s encounter passes from the bright afternoon sun to theshadows <strong>of</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g. This is a good example <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the dark to show the light.<strong>The</strong> dilemma the Tartar faces <strong>in</strong> the story “In Exile” is an excellent portrayal <strong>of</strong>the fragile human spirit. <strong>The</strong> Tartar’s dilemma <strong>of</strong> whether to give up hope and stay on theriver or to make a life for himself is revealed to him by the actions <strong>of</strong> character foils, <strong>The</strong>Preacher and Vasily. Flannery O’Connor’s “Greenleaf” pits the dysfunctional May familyaga<strong>in</strong>st the more successful Greenleaf boys to show how tolerance and hard work areworthwhile human characteristics.For many readers literature becomes an emotional experience. <strong>The</strong> selections fromour poetry unit <strong>in</strong>volve the senses by us<strong>in</strong>g highly charged language <strong>in</strong> their delivery. Atool commonly used by poets is contrast and <strong>of</strong>ten times opposites. In Robert Frost’s “<strong>The</strong>Road Not Taken,” the two roads he compares, one rough and the other smooth and welltrodden,represent difficult choices that one might encounter <strong>in</strong> life. Without the contrast<strong>of</strong> this imagery the message might be as simple as this: <strong>The</strong> easier road isn’t always best.In much the same fashion, the poem “Curiosity” by Alastair Reed teaches us that it is thelack <strong>of</strong> curiosity that usually spells trouble for most people. If we don’t take risks, wewon’t be rewarded with all that life has to <strong>of</strong>fer. But poetry isn’t the only genre that taps<strong>in</strong>to our emotions.<strong>The</strong> novella Metamorphosis strikes a chord <strong>of</strong> emotion <strong>in</strong> every reader. At first wemay be turned <strong>of</strong>f by the grotesque image <strong>of</strong> a writh<strong>in</strong>g cockroach, but before long we are


Nutt<strong>in</strong>g 3champions for Gregor, our sympathy evoked by the very nasty members <strong>of</strong> his family.Once aga<strong>in</strong> character opposites serve to deliver this contrast between the hard-work<strong>in</strong>gGregor and his father, the lazy head <strong>of</strong> the family. A symbol <strong>of</strong> this contrast is the uniformsworn by the two men. Gregor’s is an honorable military dress outfit. <strong>The</strong> father’s isthat <strong>of</strong> a lowly bank messenger boy. Gregor’s mother, rather than be<strong>in</strong>g nurtur<strong>in</strong>g andsympathetic, is self-absorbed and cares more about what the neighbors might th<strong>in</strong>k. Hissister turns on him too. By the end <strong>of</strong> the story, the reader feels only compassion for thesuffer<strong>in</strong>g Gregor and disgust for his horrible family.In a politically motivated piece such as Havel’s Unveil<strong>in</strong>g, it is emotions that theplaywright is try<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>volve. Havel wants us to feel the nature <strong>of</strong> the choice fac<strong>in</strong>g hisaudience between compet<strong>in</strong>g political loyalties, so he sets characters as silly andsuperficial as Vera and Michael aga<strong>in</strong>st the thoughtful Vanek. Vanek wants to escape theapartment from the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the play but stays to endure the antics <strong>of</strong> the couple. Atthe end he is f<strong>in</strong>ally cornered <strong>in</strong>to stay<strong>in</strong>g by Vera’s hysterical outburst. Havel makes usfeel the superficiality <strong>of</strong> the politically dom<strong>in</strong>ant ideas <strong>in</strong> his country at the time. Emotionsare <strong>of</strong>ten at the core <strong>of</strong> political issues.Contrast is an effective way for the writer to show the reader two sides <strong>of</strong> thesame co<strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong> best examples <strong>of</strong> this technique are “In Exile” and “Greenleaf.” For theTartar’s enlightenment <strong>in</strong> “In Exile” Anton Chekhov uses two opposite characters to representhow life can be <strong>in</strong> the harsh and frigid wasteland that these people have been banishedto. On one side is the ever-negative Preacher, who is stagnant and stays on theriver. He spends his days be<strong>in</strong>g lazy, selfish, and dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g his life away. On the other sidethere is the ever-positive Vasily, who never gives up hope <strong>of</strong> a useful life that can behappy and full <strong>of</strong> love from his wife and daughter. <strong>The</strong> Preacher is an existentialist, whobelieves that the only fact he can count on is that he exists. Vasily believes <strong>in</strong> hope andoptimism. By show<strong>in</strong>g us both sides <strong>of</strong> the bleak picture, Chekhov enables the reader tomake an <strong>in</strong>formed choice between two approaches to life.


Nutt<strong>in</strong>g 4In “Greenleaf” Flannery O’Connor similarly uses the contrast between two families<strong>in</strong> order to def<strong>in</strong>e how people <strong>in</strong>teract and make choices <strong>in</strong> their lives. <strong>The</strong> May familymight have started out with more, but the Greenleafs, due hard work and a strong sense<strong>of</strong> family, succeed beyond Ms. May’s comprehension and her prejudiced view <strong>of</strong> them. Withtheir fight<strong>in</strong>g and bicker<strong>in</strong>g, the May boys are a constant irritation to their mother.Instead <strong>of</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g on the farm, they make excuses for their low-level jobs <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surancesalesman and teacher. <strong>The</strong> Greenleaf boys get along well and run a clean and efficientfarm with all the latest equipment. Once aga<strong>in</strong> we have very opposite characters <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>gwith one another to enable the reader to see the whole sordid picture. <strong>The</strong> reader canthen come away from the story with a better understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> compassionand tolerance.Several important elements <strong>of</strong> literature must be present <strong>in</strong> order for a story towork. Readers won’t be drawn <strong>in</strong>to a story unless their emotions are engaged. As a reader,I need the dark <strong>in</strong> order to see the light. I need to have a writer show me both sides <strong>of</strong>the co<strong>in</strong> so that I can see the whole picture. Many <strong>of</strong> my favorite writers, Flannery O’Connorfor <strong>in</strong>stance, use this technique very effectively. I come away from a very powerfulstory like “Greenleaf” with a better understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> what she wanted me to experience. Imay never know exactly what the bull was whisper<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> old Ms. May’s ear, but I am surethat I should never be guided by preconceived notions that I know a person’s characterwithout know<strong>in</strong>g the whole story. Many excellent writers have guided me this semesterthrough a treasury <strong>of</strong> experiences with their use <strong>of</strong> opposites and contrast.


Nutt<strong>in</strong>g 5Works CitedThomas R. Arp, ed. Perr<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>Literature</strong>. Harcourt Brace. Fort Worth. 1998.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!