i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
Art on the Left in the 1930s / 631930s, as personiƒed by a fearless defender of the faith who was also a specƒcindividual. In the postwar era, when that faith, like Whalen’s name on the libertyship, was effaced, Neel would have to rethink her image of the communistworker-hero.Neel’s budding proletarian portrait gallery provides a montage of the emergenceof socially concerned art from 1933 to 1935, when the term proletarianincluded both the intelligentsia and the worker. The absence of the prominentvisual artists of these years may seem curious, but there is logic to that decision:the gallery was her contribution to social realism, and she may not havewanted to either valorize or criticize her fellow artists. The writers would serveto personify the various artistic positions within the decade. But the expressionist-realismof the paintings and their occasional artistic references also requirethe same reconstruction of historical context demanded by the sitters themselves.Her painting was representative of the socially concerned expressionismchampioned by the critics of the Art Front.During the 1930s, as German Expressionism became more widely known,it was admired as an art of social concern. 63 The earliest critical champion ofExpressionism was painter-critic Charmion von Weigand, wife of the communistwriter Joseph Freeman. In “Expressionism and Social Change” (Art Front,November 1936), von Wiegand argued that after seven years of economic“stagnation” America was now ready for a truly revolutionary, expressionist art,one that could provide “the destructive action necessary to the new future.”German Expressionist art, she argued, had lost its force after it abandoned socialcriticism. At present, its young American converts embodied the true spiritof expressionism, one that visualizes the “social struggle of our time as it assumesever more dramatic and violent form in the United States.” 64 She thenlisted the U.S. practitioners: Helen West Heller, David Burliuk, The Ten,Benjamin Kopman, Milton Avery, Herbert Kruckman, Alice Neel, and JohnVavak.In the following issue, painter-critic Jacob Kainen, who in 1934 had criticizedthe John Reed club exhibitions for being insufƒciently insurrectionary,took up the expressionist banner, uttering “harsh words” about the 1936 Whitneypainting annual, which he accurately described as boring and repetitious.Sweeping both urban and social realist painters aside with a single stroke—“the fact remains that painters like Speicher, Kroll, McFee, Karƒol, Brook,Klitgaard, Lucioni, Curry, Miller, Mattson, Hopper, Kuhn, Lawson, and severalothers look pretty old fashioned”—he bestowed his critical “best of show”award to William Gropper’s “The Senate,” 1936, a work dependent on theprecedent of Grosz. He also lauded Nahum Tschacbasov’s Deportation (1936,ƒg. 46), whose “moderated use of the Expressionist outlook should give ideasto those who are looking for new approaches.” 65 Tschacbasov’s expressionist
64 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpainting of huddled Jewish refugees, like Neel’s Nazis Murder Jews, explicitlyrefers to Nazi political persecution.A few months later, in an Art Front article entitled “Our Expressionists”(February 1937), Kainen described the new “movement” as if it were an establishedfact. Again singling out Tschacbasov as an artist who has “made Expressionismthe vehicle for a militant proletarianism,” Kainen listed twenty-threepainters who exempliƒed the new expressionism, but Neel was no longeramong them. In a melodramatic conclusion, Kainen summarized his deƒnitionof an updated revolutionary art, one no longer based on proletarian subjectmatter but on the artist’s ability to visualize the “social passions” of an era:The old, literal naturalism is failing to register esthetically in the face of vast socialpassions and portents of doom and regeneration. In proportion to the awakeningof artists to the fate which awaits the world, will painting take on a more Expressionistform. 66Kainen’s article appeared just months before the July 1937 opening of theDegenerate Art exhibition in Berlin. The Nazi condemnation of German Expressionistartists could only add to the ideological import of the style. Kainen’smanifesto proved an accurate prediction of the course of art during the waryears, for the ƒgurative expressionism of Hyman Bloom and the early JacksonPollock, if not of the lesser-known artists cited in his article, was predominantin the 1940s. But it is indicative of the aesthetic volatility of the times that thetwo early champions of ƒgurative expressionism, von Weigand and Kainen,would themselves turn to abstract painting after the war. 67At a time when two con„icting political systems occupied common groundagainst a third, no single aesthetic system could claim to have an exclusive purchaseon social reality. The staged dramas of most social realist tableaux, withtheir coherent plots, could not visualize a reality that was fragmented and contradictory.For this brief moment, expressionism appeared to be the mostpromising option for a renewed social realism. It was not the only option, however,and early in 1937, in a review of the “Fantastic Art, Dada and Surrealism”exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, von Wiegand argued that surrealism’stechniques for reaching the unconscious mind could be useful to the developmentof a new social art as well. 68The immediate result of Art Front’s expressionist manifestoes was the formationof the New York Group. Founded in 1938 by Jacob Kainen, the NewYork Group was characteristic of the short-lived alliances of artists at the end ofthe decade. “Our Expressionists” had been in part a review of an exhibit at theMontross Gallery of The Ten, and their association may have inspired Kainento form his own group. 69 Kainen chose Jules Halfant, Herb Kruckman, Louis
- Page 35 and 36: 12 / The Subjects of the Artistrect
- Page 37 and 38: 14 / The Subjects of the ArtistIt i
- Page 39 and 40: 16 / The Subjects of the Artistarti
- Page 41 and 42: 18 / The Subjects of the Artist“A
- Page 43 and 44: 20 / The Subjects of the Artistand
- Page 45 and 46: 22 / The Subjects of the Artistvent
- Page 47 and 48: 24 / The Subjects of the Artistspee
- Page 49 and 50: 26 / The Subjects of the Artistpher
- Page 51 and 52: 28 / The Subjects of the Artistzone
- Page 53 and 54: 30 / The Subjects of the Artistself
- Page 55 and 56: 32 / The Subjects of the Artistnect
- Page 57 and 58: 34 / The Subjects of the Artistcial
- Page 59 and 60: 36 / The Subjects of the Artistphia
- Page 61 and 62: 38 / The Subjects of the ArtistHowe
- Page 63 and 64: 40 / The Subjects of the Artistmist
- Page 66: Part IINeel’s Social Realist Art:
- Page 69 and 70: 46 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmor
- Page 71 and 72: 48 / Neel’s Social Realist Artalt
- Page 73 and 74: 50 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwas
- Page 75 and 76: 52 / Neel’s Social Realist Artdoc
- Page 77 and 78: 54 / Neel’s Social Realist Artten
- Page 79 and 80: 56 / Neel’s Social Realist Arting
- Page 81 and 82: 58 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmea
- Page 83 and 84: 60 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtJoe
- Page 85: 62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwou
- Page 89 and 90: 66 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsix
- Page 91 and 92: 68 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDur
- Page 93 and 94: 70 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmir
- Page 95 and 96: 72 / Neel’s Social Realist Arteve
- Page 97 and 98: 74 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPer
- Page 99 and 100: 76 / Neel’s Social Realist Arthad
- Page 101 and 102: 78 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsis
- Page 103 and 104: 80 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpai
- Page 105 and 106: 82 / Neel’s Social Realist Artint
- Page 107 and 108: 84 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtFul
- Page 109 and 110: 86 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDre
- Page 111 and 112: 88 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtIn
- Page 113 and 114: 6El Barrio:Portrait of Spanish Harl
- Page 115 and 116: 92 / Neel’s Social Realist Arttha
- Page 117 and 118: 94 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtSuc
- Page 119 and 120: 96 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwhe
- Page 121 and 122: 98 / Neel’s Social Realist Artcal
- Page 123 and 124: 100 / Neel’s Social Realist Artte
- Page 125 and 126: 102 / Neel’s Social Realist Artar
- Page 127 and 128: 104 / Neel’s Social Realist Artun
- Page 129 and 130: 106 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPu
- Page 131 and 132: 108 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtWh
- Page 134 and 135: 7A Gallery of Players:Artist-Critic
64 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpainting of huddled Jewish refugees, like Neel’s Nazis Murder Jews, explicitlyrefers to Nazi political persecution.A few months later, in an Art <strong>Front</strong> article entitled “Our Expressionists”(February 1937), Kainen described the new “movement” as if it were an establishedfact. Again singling out Tschacbasov as an artist who has “made Expressionismthe vehicle for a militant proletarianism,” Kainen listed twenty-threepainters who exempliƒed the new expressionism, but Neel was no longeramong them. In a melodramatic conclusion, Kainen summarized his deƒnitionof an updated revolutionary art, one no longer based on proletarian subject<strong>matter</strong> but on the artist’s ability to visualize the “social passions” of an era:The old, literal naturalism is failing to register esthetically in the face of vast socialpassions and portents of doom and regeneration. In proportion to the awakeningof artists to the fate which awaits the world, will painting take on a more Expressionistform. 66Kainen’s article appeared just months before the July 1937 opening of theDegenerate Art exhibition in Berlin. The Nazi condemnation of German Expressionistartists could only add to the ideological import of the style. Kainen’smanifesto proved an accurate prediction of the course of art during the waryears, for the ƒgurative expressionism of Hyman Bloom and the early JacksonPollock, if not of the lesser-known artists cited in his article, was predominantin the 1940s. But it is indicative of the aesthetic volatility of the times that thetwo early champions of ƒgurative expressionism, von Weigand and Kainen,would themselves turn to abstract painting after the war. 67At a time when two con„icting political systems occupied common groundagainst a third, no single aesthetic system could claim to have an exclusive purchaseon social reality. The staged dramas of most social realist tableaux, withtheir coherent plots, could not visualize a reality that was fragmented and contradictory.For this brief moment, expressionism appeared to be the mostpromising option for a renewed social realism. It was not the only option, however,and early in 1937, in a review of the “Fantastic Art, Dada and Surrealism”exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, von Wiegand argued that surrealism’stechniques for reaching the unconscious mind could be useful to the developmentof a new social art as well. 68The immediate result of Art <strong>Front</strong>’s expressionist manifestoes was the formationof the New York Group. Founded in 1938 by Jacob Kainen, the NewYork Group was characteristic of the short-lived alliances of artists at the end ofthe decade. “Our Expressionists” had been in part a review of an exhibit at theMontross Gallery of The Ten, and their association may have inspired Kainento form his own group. 69 Kainen chose Jules Halfant, Herb Kruckman, Louis