i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

bir.brandeis.edu
from bir.brandeis.edu More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

Art on the Left in the 1930s / 61recalls that Freud saw the Medusa’s Head as “a conƒrmation of the technicalrule according to which a multiplication of penis symbols signiƒes castration.”52 The univocal male voice that normally and normatively accompaniesthe intact member is as silent as the pile of empty notebooks that Gould left athis death. According to Peter Brooks’s gloss of Lacan, “patriarchy is the basis ofknowledge and power, and [because] the gaze is phallic . . . to display the penisis to turn subject into object, a twist or per-version.” 53 Neel’s twist uncaps, Pandora-like,the female gaze, a gaze that undermines certain fundamental assumptionsof patriarchal culture.Recognizing its landmark importance, Neel inscribed the painting’s datebetween Gould’s legs. Neel’s con„ation of the genres of portraiture and thenude, like her con„ation of history painting, portraiture, and literature, simultaneouslyde-constructs existing conventions and substitutes new ones in theirplace. Her gallery of New York intellectuals, the creative male elite, is perhapsnot as potent as its own self-image, since its “members” can be added to ordeleted without signiƒcant alteration. 54 Yet the fact that until World War IINeel’s proletarian portrait gallery omitted women artists and activists indicatesthat despite her protofeminist criticism of patriarchal culture, she retained itsbiases. Her friendships were with men.Neel’s visual history is sharpened and clariƒed by comparison. The Putnam-White pairing charts the emergence of proletarian literature between 1933and 1935, whereas her 1935 portraits of Kenneth Fearing and Pat Whalenunite intelligentsia and worker to visualize the period’s proletarian ideal. In anexception to Neel’s customary practice of isolating her sitters against a plainground, in Kenneth Fearing (ƒg. 44) the poet and his “literary setting” areunited. Seated with shirtsleeves rolled up beneath the bare bulb of “inspiration,”the gaunt, angular artist—with his hair bristling, his ƒsts clenched, andhis ears tuned to the city’s sounds—projects contained energy. The device ofsurrounding an author with his cast of characters is unusual in Americanpainting, although it is found in popular sources such as magazine illustration.55 Neel’s allusion may refer to the style of Fearing’s writings, which arepart of the tradition of hard-boiled, or pulp ƒction. 56Fearing’s pose, three-quarter view, seated facing left, with resolute stare andclenched ƒst, so closely matches that of the maritime union activist PatWhalen (1935, ƒg. 45) that the two contemporary portraits seem designed tohang together. So paired, they present the ideal rather than the reality of theera, that of intellectuals and blue-collar workers sharing a vision of a new communistsociety and working side by side for the revolution. With his unwaveringstare, ƒrm-set jaw, and clenched ƒsts, Whalen is a cliché of the proletarianhero found throughout socially concerned art of this period. From the DailyWorker headline beneath his ƒsts, “Steel, Coal Strikes Set for June 16,” 57 one

62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwould assume Whalen to be a mill or mine worker, but Whalen was a maritimeworker, a seaman stationed in Baltimore, the ƒrst of several importantunion leaders Neel recorded. Why then no newspaper reference to the greatWest Coast maritime strike that had erupted in May 1934? Perhaps Neelchose instead to refer to the inter-union con„ict that would lead in October ofthat year to the creation of the left-leaning industrial union, the CIO, by JohnL. Lewis, head of the United Mine Workers. Whalen’s Marine Workers IndustrialUnion had dissolved in 1935, and so the future of the union movement,and the communists’ position within it, was unstable. Whalen’s two clenchedƒsts, planted on the Daily Worker, may indicate the double front on whichcommunist union leaders were then forced to ƒght.Neel’s 1983 remembrance of Whalen, like all good oral (anecdotal) history,encapsulates more scholarly written histories, such as Bruce Nelson’s Workerson the Waterfront (1988):Patty Whalen was the organizer on the waterfront . . . He was just an ordinary Irishmanexcept for one thing: He was absolutely convinced of Communism, and hecould convince other longshoremen . . . I painted another painting of him pullingdown the swastika „ag from the Bremen, but I painted over it . . . A liberty ship wasnamed for him after the war, but during the McCarthy era they changed the nameof the ship . . .George Myers told us a great story about when Patty Whalen was head of theport of Baltimore, a very important job. Patty Whalen would go into a bar. Hewould demand a drink for a black man who was with him. They’d say: “We do notserve Negroes here.” So Patty Whalen would take his heavy glass of beer andsmash the mirror . . . And ƒnally the owners of the bar were so intimidated thatthey would sell to Negroes.” 58Neel’s verbal picture of a communist union activist conƒrms Nelson’s thesisthat the maritime unions in the 1930s, motivated by “a powerful determinationto transform the world of work,” made major gains during the Depression59 and were not paralyzed by the social inertia of the working class. 60Although Whalen is not mentioned in Nelson’s discussion of the MarineWorker’s Industrial Union in Baltimore, he characterizes the leaders there asparticularly hard-working and self-sacriƒcing. 61 During the Popular Front era,their most conspicuous and dramatic acts involved pulling down the swastikasfrom German ships in Olympia, Washington, San Francisco, and New York.Whalen, with his unshakable resolve, has all of the attributes of the leaders inthese years, as well as the record of Communist proselytizing, and of ƒghtingagainst particularism, racial discrimination, and fascism that characterized theunion’s heroes. 62 Neel’s portrait is a record of communist idealism in the

62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwould assume Whalen to be a mill or mine worker, but Whalen was a maritimeworker, a seaman stationed in Baltimore, the ƒrst of several importantunion leaders Neel recorded. Why then no newspaper reference to the greatWest Coast maritime strike that had erupted in May 1934? Perhaps Neelchose instead to refer to the inter-union con„ict that would lead in October ofthat year to the creation of the left-leaning industrial union, the CIO, by JohnL. Lewis, head of the United Mine Workers. Whalen’s Marine Workers IndustrialUnion had dissolved in 1935, and so the future of the union movement,and the communists’ position within it, was unstable. Whalen’s two clenchedƒsts, planted on the Daily Worker, may indicate the double front on whichcommunist union leaders were then forced to ƒght.Neel’s 1983 remembrance of Whalen, like all good oral (anecdotal) history,encapsulates more scholarly written histories, such as Bruce Nelson’s Workerson the Waterfront (1988):Patty Whalen was the organizer on the waterfront . . . He was just an ordinary Irishmanexcept for one thing: He was absolutely convinced of Communism, and hecould convince other longshoremen . . . I painted another painting of him pullingdown the swastika „ag from the Bremen, but I painted over it . . . A liberty ship wasnamed for him after the war, but during the McCarthy era they changed the nameof the ship . . .George Myers told us a great story about when Patty Whalen was head of theport of Baltimore, a very important job. Patty Whalen would go into a bar. Hewould demand a drink for a black man who was with him. They’d say: “We do notserve Negroes here.” So Patty Whalen would take his heavy glass of beer andsmash the mirror . . . And ƒnally the owners of the bar were so intimidated thatthey would sell to Negroes.” 58Neel’s verbal picture of a communist union activist conƒrms Nelson’s thesisthat the maritime unions in the 1930s, motivated by “a powerful determinationto transform the world of work,” made major gains during the Depression59 and were not paralyzed by the social inertia of the working class. 60Although Whalen is not mentioned in Nelson’s discussion of the MarineWorker’s Industrial Union in Baltimore, he characterizes the leaders there asparticularly hard-working and self-sacriƒcing. 61 During the Popular <strong>Front</strong> era,their most conspicuous and dramatic acts involved pulling down the swastikasfrom German ships in Olympia, Washington, San Francisco, and New York.Whalen, with his unshakable resolve, has all of the attributes of the leaders inthese years, as well as the record of Communist proselytizing, and of ƒghtingagainst particularism, racial discrimination, and fascism that characterized theunion’s heroes. 62 Neel’s portrait is a record of communist idealism in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!