i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
Art on the Left in the 1930s / 61recalls that Freud saw the Medusa’s Head as “a conƒrmation of the technicalrule according to which a multiplication of penis symbols signiƒes castration.”52 The univocal male voice that normally and normatively accompaniesthe intact member is as silent as the pile of empty notebooks that Gould left athis death. According to Peter Brooks’s gloss of Lacan, “patriarchy is the basis ofknowledge and power, and [because] the gaze is phallic . . . to display the penisis to turn subject into object, a twist or per-version.” 53 Neel’s twist uncaps, Pandora-like,the female gaze, a gaze that undermines certain fundamental assumptionsof patriarchal culture.Recognizing its landmark importance, Neel inscribed the painting’s datebetween Gould’s legs. Neel’s con„ation of the genres of portraiture and thenude, like her con„ation of history painting, portraiture, and literature, simultaneouslyde-constructs existing conventions and substitutes new ones in theirplace. Her gallery of New York intellectuals, the creative male elite, is perhapsnot as potent as its own self-image, since its “members” can be added to ordeleted without signiƒcant alteration. 54 Yet the fact that until World War IINeel’s proletarian portrait gallery omitted women artists and activists indicatesthat despite her protofeminist criticism of patriarchal culture, she retained itsbiases. Her friendships were with men.Neel’s visual history is sharpened and clariƒed by comparison. The Putnam-White pairing charts the emergence of proletarian literature between 1933and 1935, whereas her 1935 portraits of Kenneth Fearing and Pat Whalenunite intelligentsia and worker to visualize the period’s proletarian ideal. In anexception to Neel’s customary practice of isolating her sitters against a plainground, in Kenneth Fearing (ƒg. 44) the poet and his “literary setting” areunited. Seated with shirtsleeves rolled up beneath the bare bulb of “inspiration,”the gaunt, angular artist—with his hair bristling, his ƒsts clenched, andhis ears tuned to the city’s sounds—projects contained energy. The device ofsurrounding an author with his cast of characters is unusual in Americanpainting, although it is found in popular sources such as magazine illustration.55 Neel’s allusion may refer to the style of Fearing’s writings, which arepart of the tradition of hard-boiled, or pulp ƒction. 56Fearing’s pose, three-quarter view, seated facing left, with resolute stare andclenched ƒst, so closely matches that of the maritime union activist PatWhalen (1935, ƒg. 45) that the two contemporary portraits seem designed tohang together. So paired, they present the ideal rather than the reality of theera, that of intellectuals and blue-collar workers sharing a vision of a new communistsociety and working side by side for the revolution. With his unwaveringstare, ƒrm-set jaw, and clenched ƒsts, Whalen is a cliché of the proletarianhero found throughout socially concerned art of this period. From the DailyWorker headline beneath his ƒsts, “Steel, Coal Strikes Set for June 16,” 57 one
62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwould assume Whalen to be a mill or mine worker, but Whalen was a maritimeworker, a seaman stationed in Baltimore, the ƒrst of several importantunion leaders Neel recorded. Why then no newspaper reference to the greatWest Coast maritime strike that had erupted in May 1934? Perhaps Neelchose instead to refer to the inter-union con„ict that would lead in October ofthat year to the creation of the left-leaning industrial union, the CIO, by JohnL. Lewis, head of the United Mine Workers. Whalen’s Marine Workers IndustrialUnion had dissolved in 1935, and so the future of the union movement,and the communists’ position within it, was unstable. Whalen’s two clenchedƒsts, planted on the Daily Worker, may indicate the double front on whichcommunist union leaders were then forced to ƒght.Neel’s 1983 remembrance of Whalen, like all good oral (anecdotal) history,encapsulates more scholarly written histories, such as Bruce Nelson’s Workerson the Waterfront (1988):Patty Whalen was the organizer on the waterfront . . . He was just an ordinary Irishmanexcept for one thing: He was absolutely convinced of Communism, and hecould convince other longshoremen . . . I painted another painting of him pullingdown the swastika „ag from the Bremen, but I painted over it . . . A liberty ship wasnamed for him after the war, but during the McCarthy era they changed the nameof the ship . . .George Myers told us a great story about when Patty Whalen was head of theport of Baltimore, a very important job. Patty Whalen would go into a bar. Hewould demand a drink for a black man who was with him. They’d say: “We do notserve Negroes here.” So Patty Whalen would take his heavy glass of beer andsmash the mirror . . . And ƒnally the owners of the bar were so intimidated thatthey would sell to Negroes.” 58Neel’s verbal picture of a communist union activist conƒrms Nelson’s thesisthat the maritime unions in the 1930s, motivated by “a powerful determinationto transform the world of work,” made major gains during the Depression59 and were not paralyzed by the social inertia of the working class. 60Although Whalen is not mentioned in Nelson’s discussion of the MarineWorker’s Industrial Union in Baltimore, he characterizes the leaders there asparticularly hard-working and self-sacriƒcing. 61 During the Popular Front era,their most conspicuous and dramatic acts involved pulling down the swastikasfrom German ships in Olympia, Washington, San Francisco, and New York.Whalen, with his unshakable resolve, has all of the attributes of the leaders inthese years, as well as the record of Communist proselytizing, and of ƒghtingagainst particularism, racial discrimination, and fascism that characterized theunion’s heroes. 62 Neel’s portrait is a record of communist idealism in the
- Page 33 and 34: 10 / The Subjects of the ArtistBeca
- Page 35 and 36: 12 / The Subjects of the Artistrect
- Page 37 and 38: 14 / The Subjects of the ArtistIt i
- Page 39 and 40: 16 / The Subjects of the Artistarti
- Page 41 and 42: 18 / The Subjects of the Artist“A
- Page 43 and 44: 20 / The Subjects of the Artistand
- Page 45 and 46: 22 / The Subjects of the Artistvent
- Page 47 and 48: 24 / The Subjects of the Artistspee
- Page 49 and 50: 26 / The Subjects of the Artistpher
- Page 51 and 52: 28 / The Subjects of the Artistzone
- Page 53 and 54: 30 / The Subjects of the Artistself
- Page 55 and 56: 32 / The Subjects of the Artistnect
- Page 57 and 58: 34 / The Subjects of the Artistcial
- Page 59 and 60: 36 / The Subjects of the Artistphia
- Page 61 and 62: 38 / The Subjects of the ArtistHowe
- Page 63 and 64: 40 / The Subjects of the Artistmist
- Page 66: Part IINeel’s Social Realist Art:
- Page 69 and 70: 46 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmor
- Page 71 and 72: 48 / Neel’s Social Realist Artalt
- Page 73 and 74: 50 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwas
- Page 75 and 76: 52 / Neel’s Social Realist Artdoc
- Page 77 and 78: 54 / Neel’s Social Realist Artten
- Page 79 and 80: 56 / Neel’s Social Realist Arting
- Page 81 and 82: 58 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmea
- Page 83: 60 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtJoe
- Page 87 and 88: 64 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpai
- Page 89 and 90: 66 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsix
- Page 91 and 92: 68 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDur
- Page 93 and 94: 70 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmir
- Page 95 and 96: 72 / Neel’s Social Realist Arteve
- Page 97 and 98: 74 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPer
- Page 99 and 100: 76 / Neel’s Social Realist Arthad
- Page 101 and 102: 78 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsis
- Page 103 and 104: 80 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpai
- Page 105 and 106: 82 / Neel’s Social Realist Artint
- Page 107 and 108: 84 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtFul
- Page 109 and 110: 86 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDre
- Page 111 and 112: 88 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtIn
- Page 113 and 114: 6El Barrio:Portrait of Spanish Harl
- Page 115 and 116: 92 / Neel’s Social Realist Arttha
- Page 117 and 118: 94 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtSuc
- Page 119 and 120: 96 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwhe
- Page 121 and 122: 98 / Neel’s Social Realist Artcal
- Page 123 and 124: 100 / Neel’s Social Realist Artte
- Page 125 and 126: 102 / Neel’s Social Realist Artar
- Page 127 and 128: 104 / Neel’s Social Realist Artun
- Page 129 and 130: 106 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPu
- Page 131 and 132: 108 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtWh
62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwould assume Whalen to be a mill or mine worker, but Whalen was a maritimeworker, a seaman stationed in Baltimore, the ƒrst of several importantunion leaders Neel recorded. Why then no newspaper reference to the greatWest Coast maritime strike that had erupted in May 1934? Perhaps Neelchose instead to refer to the inter-union con„ict that would lead in October ofthat year to the creation of the left-leaning industrial union, the CIO, by JohnL. Lewis, head of the United Mine Workers. Whalen’s Marine Workers IndustrialUnion had dissolved in 1935, and so the future of the union movement,and the communists’ position within it, was unstable. Whalen’s two clenchedƒsts, planted on the Daily Worker, may indicate the double front on whichcommunist union leaders were then forced to ƒght.Neel’s 1983 remembrance of Whalen, like all good oral (anecdotal) history,encapsulates more scholarly written histories, such as Bruce Nelson’s Workerson the Waterfront (1988):Patty Whalen was the organizer on the waterfront . . . He was just an ordinary Irishmanexcept for one thing: He was absolutely convinced of Communism, and hecould convince other longshoremen . . . I painted another painting of him pullingdown the swastika „ag from the Bremen, but I painted over it . . . A liberty ship wasnamed for him after the war, but during the McCarthy era they changed the nameof the ship . . .George Myers told us a great story about when Patty Whalen was head of theport of Baltimore, a very important job. Patty Whalen would go into a bar. Hewould demand a drink for a black man who was with him. They’d say: “We do notserve Negroes here.” So Patty Whalen would take his heavy glass of beer andsmash the mirror . . . And ƒnally the owners of the bar were so intimidated thatthey would sell to Negroes.” 58Neel’s verbal picture of a communist union activist conƒrms Nelson’s thesisthat the maritime unions in the 1930s, motivated by “a powerful determinationto transform the world of work,” made major gains during the Depression59 and were not paralyzed by the social inertia of the working class. 60Although Whalen is not mentioned in Nelson’s discussion of the MarineWorker’s Industrial Union in Baltimore, he characterizes the leaders there asparticularly hard-working and self-sacriƒcing. 61 During the Popular <strong>Front</strong> era,their most conspicuous and dramatic acts involved pulling down the swastikasfrom German ships in Olympia, Washington, San Francisco, and New York.Whalen, with his unshakable resolve, has all of the attributes of the leaders inthese years, as well as the record of Communist proselytizing, and of ƒghtingagainst particularism, racial discrimination, and fascism that characterized theunion’s heroes. 62 Neel’s portrait is a record of communist idealism in the