i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
Starting Out from Home / 37set of the Depression. Futility of Effort (1930, ƒg. 26), a metaphor for the deadendingof her marriage with the departure of Carlos and Isabetta for Cuba onMay 1 of that year, was generated by “a notice in the newspaper about how achild crawled through the end of a bed and got strangled through the bedposts.The mother was ironing in the kitchen.” 16 Although the subject of the death ofinnocent children would be found fairly frequently in left-wing periodicalssuch as Art Front (the journal of the Artists Union), where this painting was reproducedin 1936, Neel’s early approach to the subject would prove exceptional.In most social realist art the mother remains the bulwark of the family,clinging to her children no matter how desperate the circumstances. Instead,Neel limns a harsher, less sentimental story with minimal means. The dolllike,lifeless ƒgure hangs from a bedpost suspended in a neutral grey ƒeld, withthe sketchy proƒle of the parent to the right, and with the black diamondshapedaperture of the window on the left marking the point of life’s departureinto death. The painting is as distilled as a memory, an image of a moment ofnegligence branded permanently onto the mind. The title supplied by ArtFront—Poverty—underscores the cause of the “accident,” which was deprivationas much as individual negligence, but Neel’s own title, Futility of Effort,conveys the hopelessness of lives lived in the grey, dimensionless, unchartedregion of indigence. The painted metal bed frame reprises the chair seats inWell-Baby Clinic, thus identifying poverty as an institution into which societyconƒnes certain of its members, sentencing them to ongoing family tragedy.Like the body of the child, Neel’s own psychic health had been broken in1930, and she became a resident of the medical institutions she so effectivelyparodied in Well-Baby Clinic. Like the earlier oil, the pencil drawing SuicidalWard, Philadelphia General Hospital (1931, ƒg. 27) documents the disjunctionbetween hospital care and the cure it claims to provide. The lines of examiningtables are now rows of beds, equally incapable of soothing their agonizedoccupants. The affable doctor, a wooden, insensitive ƒgurehead in controlof himself if nothing else, occupies the center of the medical arena.Drawn from her memory after release from the Philadelphia General Hospital,Suicidal Ward is a document of medical sadism presaging documentaryƒlms such as Richard Leacock’s Titicut Follies.Within modernism, insanity has been generalized into the trope of the sufferingartist, whose genius necessarily entails antisocial behavior. Neel makesno such romantic connection between creativity and insanity. Rather her interesthere is in its institutionalization: the restraint and ineffectual treatmentof those diagnosed as insane. The authority in control, Dr. Breitenbach, posesas the competent ofƒcial he imagines himself to be. According to Michel Foucault’sMadness and Civilization, the physician became “the essential ƒgure ofthe asylum” during the nineteenth century, converting it “into a medical space”:
38 / The Subjects of the ArtistHowever, and this is the essential point . . . It is not as a scientist that homo medicushas authority in the asylum, but as a wise man . . . [T]hese powers . . . took root inthe madman’s minority status, in the insanity of his person, not of his mind. If themedical personage could isolate madness, it was not because he knew it, but becausehe mastered it. 17Lacking in any genuine scientiƒc expertise, the doctor’s role is primarily supervisoryor regulatory: he is the personiƒcation of paternalism. Whereas in theclinic the doctor’s authority comes from his ability to see and to say—to applyknowledge to empirical observation—in Neel’s rendering, there is no attemptto speak (to diagnose and to cure), but only to appear to be in authority. Undersuch nonchalant observation, the differences between depression, insanity,and illness are elided, and Neel’s carefully individualized patients suffer in silence,unrecognized or acknowledged by the doctor’s distant, unfocused gaze.“See, that shows you’re mentally healthy, when you smile like that,” 18 wasNeel’s cynical addendum to the caustic commentary her drawing had alreadyprovided. Later, she would attribute her recovery not to medical treatment butto her own self-discipline.The reality of the asylum, and the regulation of one class and sex by anotherexplodes the modernist myth of the insane creative genius. Suicidal Ward depictswomen who are mentally or physically ill, not tormented artists. Thestudy of hysteria, a “woman’s af„iction,” has never been considered a componentof female creativity, but merely a natural inclination that served as a usefulmodel for male creativity. 19 Carolyn Heilbrun has argued that it was notuntil the generation of women writers born in the 1920s that woman’s insanityand incarceration could be expressed in autobiographical terms.The culmination of the early family depictions is not a narrative work, butrather a still-life. Neel’s ƒrst use of inanimate objects as a vehicle for mourningit carries emotional content through metaphor rather than through expressionistexaggeration. Painted after Alice had moved to Greenwich Village andher daughter was living in the care of Carlos’s sisters in Havana, Symbols (Dolland Apple) (1932, ƒg. 28) is an altar on which the doll/martyr of motherhoodis sacriƒced. Ostensibly the proud mother in a family snapshot from 1929(ƒg. 29), by 1932 this image had been thoroughly shattered. Neel explainedthe stresses that led to her decision to permit Carlos’s sisters to raise Isabetta asfollows: “You see, I always had this awful dichotomy. I loved Isabetta, of courseI did. But I wanted to paint. Also, a terrible rivalry sprang up between Carlosand me.” 20The devastating consequences of the social construction of motherhood inWestern Christian culture are conveyed through the starkly presented object:her life laid before us on the now-familiar examining table, drenched in a
- Page 9 and 10: viii / ContentsPART II: NEEL’S SO
- Page 11 and 12: x / Illustrations in the Print Edit
- Page 13 and 14: xii / Illustrations in the Print Ed
- Page 15 and 16: xiv / Illustrations in the Print Ed
- Page 17 and 18: xvi / Acknowledgmentstors Virginia
- Page 19 and 20: xviii / Pictures of Peoplepression,
- Page 21 and 22: xx / Pictures of Peopleof the bawdy
- Page 24: Part IThe Subjects of the Artist
- Page 27 and 28: 4 / The Subjects of the Artistexpla
- Page 29 and 30: 6 / The Subjects of the Artistclass
- Page 31 and 32: 8 / The Subjects of the ArtistThe r
- Page 33 and 34: 10 / The Subjects of the ArtistBeca
- Page 35 and 36: 12 / The Subjects of the Artistrect
- Page 37 and 38: 14 / The Subjects of the ArtistIt i
- Page 39 and 40: 16 / The Subjects of the Artistarti
- Page 41 and 42: 18 / The Subjects of the Artist“A
- Page 43 and 44: 20 / The Subjects of the Artistand
- Page 45 and 46: 22 / The Subjects of the Artistvent
- Page 47 and 48: 24 / The Subjects of the Artistspee
- Page 49 and 50: 26 / The Subjects of the Artistpher
- Page 51 and 52: 28 / The Subjects of the Artistzone
- Page 53 and 54: 30 / The Subjects of the Artistself
- Page 55 and 56: 32 / The Subjects of the Artistnect
- Page 57 and 58: 34 / The Subjects of the Artistcial
- Page 59: 36 / The Subjects of the Artistphia
- Page 63 and 64: 40 / The Subjects of the Artistmist
- Page 66: Part IINeel’s Social Realist Art:
- Page 69 and 70: 46 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmor
- Page 71 and 72: 48 / Neel’s Social Realist Artalt
- Page 73 and 74: 50 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwas
- Page 75 and 76: 52 / Neel’s Social Realist Artdoc
- Page 77 and 78: 54 / Neel’s Social Realist Artten
- Page 79 and 80: 56 / Neel’s Social Realist Arting
- Page 81 and 82: 58 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmea
- Page 83 and 84: 60 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtJoe
- Page 85 and 86: 62 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwou
- Page 87 and 88: 64 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpai
- Page 89 and 90: 66 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsix
- Page 91 and 92: 68 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDur
- Page 93 and 94: 70 / Neel’s Social Realist Artmir
- Page 95 and 96: 72 / Neel’s Social Realist Arteve
- Page 97 and 98: 74 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPer
- Page 99 and 100: 76 / Neel’s Social Realist Arthad
- Page 101 and 102: 78 / Neel’s Social Realist Artsis
- Page 103 and 104: 80 / Neel’s Social Realist Artpai
- Page 105 and 106: 82 / Neel’s Social Realist Artint
- Page 107 and 108: 84 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtFul
- Page 109 and 110: 86 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtDre
Starting Out from Home / 37set of the Depression. Futility of Effort (1930, ƒg. 26), a metaphor for the deadendingof her marriage with the departure of Carlos and Isabetta for Cuba onMay 1 of that year, was generated by “a notice in the newspaper about how achild crawled through the end of a bed and got strangled through the bedposts.The mother was ironing in the kitchen.” 16 Although the subject of the death ofinnocent children would be found fairly frequently in left-wing periodicalssuch as Art <strong>Front</strong> (the journal of the Artists Union), where this painting was reproducedin 1936, Neel’s early approach to the subject would prove exceptional.In most social realist art the mother remains the bulwark of the family,clinging to her children no <strong>matter</strong> how desperate the circumstances. Instead,Neel limns a harsher, less sentimental story with minimal means. The dolllike,lifeless ƒgure hangs from a bedpost suspended in a neutral grey ƒeld, withthe sketchy proƒle of the parent to the right, and with the black diamondshapedaperture of the window on the left marking the point of life’s departureinto death. The painting is as distilled as a memory, an image of a moment ofnegligence branded permanently onto the mind. The title supplied by Art<strong>Front</strong>—Poverty—underscores the cause of the “accident,” which was deprivationas much as individual negligence, but Neel’s own title, Futility of Effort,conveys the hopelessness of lives lived in the grey, dimensionless, unchartedregion of indigence. The painted metal bed frame reprises the chair seats inWell-Baby Clinic, thus identifying poverty as an institution into which societyconƒnes certain of its members, sentencing them to ongoing family tragedy.Like the body of the child, Neel’s own psychic health had been broken in1930, and she became a resident of the medical institutions she so effectivelyparodied in Well-Baby Clinic. Like the earlier oil, the pencil drawing SuicidalWard, Philadelphia General Hospital (1931, ƒg. 27) documents the disjunctionbetween hospital care and the cure it claims to provide. The lines of examiningtables are now rows of beds, equally incapable of soothing their agonizedoccupants. The affable doctor, a wooden, insensitive ƒgurehead in controlof himself if nothing else, occupies the center of the medical arena.Drawn from her memory after release from the Philadelphia General Hospital,Suicidal Ward is a document of medical sadism presaging documentaryƒlms such as Richard Leacock’s Titicut Follies.Within modernism, insanity has been generalized into the trope of the sufferingartist, whose genius necessarily entails antisocial behavior. Neel makesno such romantic connection between creativity and insanity. Rather her interesthere is in its institutionalization: the restraint and ineffectual treatmentof those diagnosed as insane. The authority in control, Dr. Breitenbach, posesas the competent ofƒcial he imagines himself to be. According to Michel Foucault’sMadness and Civilization, the physician became “the essential ƒgure ofthe asylum” during the nineteenth century, converting it “into a medical space”: