i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
Notes / 195designed to jolt the reader out of complacency. Gold: “They told me to love mycountry, America. / But where is America? . . . America, I cannot worship yourMoney god / This monster whose heart is a Ford Car / Whose brain is a cheap HollywoodMovie / Whose cities are mad mechanical nightmares.” Mike Gold, “120Million,” in 120 Million (New York: International Publishers, 1929), 191. Ginsberg:“Moloch whose mind is pure machinery! Moloch whose blood is runningmoney! Moloch whose ƒngers are ten armies!” Allen Ginsberg, “Howl,” in CollectedPoems, 1947–1980 (New York: Harper & Row, 1984), 131.72. For a comparison of Gold and Ginsberg see Dickstein, “The Tenement and theWorld,” 71–72.73. Hills, Alice Neel, 118–19.74. Michael Gold, “The Happy Corpse,” in “Spring in the Bronx,” Masses & Mainstream5/7 (July 1952), 17.75. From the eulogy by Hank Starr, Daily World, June 21, 1974.76. He was also a member of the American Society for the Study of the German DemocraticRepublic, which once owned the portrait. Newsletter for the American Societyfor the Study of the German Democratic Republic 1/1 (October 1979). Neelarchives, Neel Arts, New York City.77. Anthony Tommasini, “A Critic’s Creed: Plug Yourself and Your Fellow Americans,”New York Times, August 21, 1994.78. Lawrence Alloway, “The Renewal of Realist Criticism,” Art in America 68/7(September 1981), 110.79. May Stevens, “The Non-Portrait Work of Alice Neel,” Women’s Studies, an InterdisciplinaryJournal (London, 1978), 64.80. Moses would die the year after the portrait was completed, but Raphael would outliveNeel by three years.81. Barbaralee Diamonsteen, Inside New York’s Artworld (New York: Rizzoli, 1979),374.82. Milton Brown, “Interview with Raphael Soyer,” 38.83. Unlike Neel, he avoided the male nude, which he confessed embarrassed him. Diamonsteen,Inside, 379.84. Brown, “Interview,” 65.85. Letter from Gus Hall to Neel, February 5, 1982. Neel correspondence, Neel Arts,New York City.86. Michael Riley, “Proƒle: Last of the Red-Hot Believers,” Time, September 9, 1991.87. Benny Andrews and Rudolf Baranik, eds., “Foreword,” The Attica Book (New York:The Black Emergency Cultural Coalition and Artists and Writers Protest Againstthe War in Vietnam, 1972).88. Stevens, “The Non-Portrait Work of Alice Neel.”89. Interviews with Rudolph Baranik and May Stevens, New York City, March 5, 1991and October 12, 1993. The artists do not claim credit for their support of Neel, butthe credit is unquestionably due.90. Appropriately enough, Neel’s art appeared ƒrst in an anthology of literature: JerreMangione, The Federal Writers Project, 1935–1943, The Dream and the Deal(Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown, 1972), which was illustrated with her portraits
196 / Notesof Sam Putnam, Joe Gould, and Kenneth Fearing, and which Neel herself reviewedfor the Daily World. Alice Neel, “WPA Writers Project Seen as Success, DespiteRightists,” Daily World, November 11, 1972. She was included in importantexhibitions such as the extensive “New York City WPA Art” at the Parsons Schoolof Design in 1977, Patricia Hills’s “Social Concern and Urban Realism” in 1983,and “Women Artists of the New Deal” at the National Musem of Women in theArts in 1988. She was also included in exhibitions of the politics of the 1930s to the1950s: Irving Howe’s “Images of Labor” (1981); Philip S. Foner and ReinhardSchultz’s “The Other America: Art and the Labour Movement in the UnitedStates” (1985, Germany); and Rob A. Okun’s “Unknown Secrets: Art and the RosenbergEra” (1988). The Foner-Schultz exhibit included Nazis Murder Jews, UneedaBiscuit Strike, and Pat Whalen.91. Typescript (undated) by Anton Refregier of Foreword to catalog of “AmericanArtists Gift Exhibition.” ACA gallery papers, Archives of American Art, D304, 1093.Among the artists in the exhibition were Anton Refregier, Philip Evergood, FredEllis, William Gropper, Frank Kleinholz, Joseph Hirsch, Alex Dobkin, Sarai Sherman,Abram Tromka, Antoney Toney, Mervyn Jules, Charles Keller, RockwellKent, Raphael Soyer, Abraham Harriton, Moses Soyer, Philip Reisman, MorrisKriensky, Gerrit Hondius, Gladys Rockmore Davis, Nicoli Cikovsky, Neel, HarryGottlieb, David Burliuk, and Paul Sample. Neel’s statement for the brochure emphasizedher Spanish Harlem work: “I live . . . in a neighborhood where there aremany Puerto Ricans and I have painted many pictures of them. I have painted theold and the young, the young writers and poets, and the working people” (3).92. From the Moscow Writer’s Union in 1959 he wrote: “You asked me to tell you thereal truth about the U.S.S.R.—as far as I am concerned, I am quite at home here.”Neel correspondence, Neel Arts, New York City.93. For example, Eva Cockcroft, 1974; David and Cecile Schapiro, 1977; Serge Guilbaut,1980; the authors are not speciƒcally cited, however. [Philip Bonosky, Introduction],“Alice Neel,” exhibition catalog, Soviet Artists Union, July 9–31, 1981;trans. Thompson Bradley (Russian to English), typescript, Neel Arts, New York City.94. In her interview with Susan Ortega, Neel echoed Bonosky: “The Soviet Unionwants peace and friendship and Brezhnev has offered any number of times to talk tothis country . . . This country is now warlike and a threat to the world. Reagan saidthe government doesn’t owe anybody anything. In the Soviet Union you get freemedical care—everything is free. There the government owes you everything.” SusanOrtega, “Art for Detente,” [1981], Daily World. Neel scrapbook 4, Neel Arts,New York City.95. An editorial, “United, Multinational,” published in Pravda on May 19, anticipatedthe tedious speechmaking that would take place six weeks later at the Seventh RepublicWriters Congress at the Writers Union, which coincidentally opened onJune 30, one week before Neel’s exhibit opened at the Artists Union. As articulatedby Georgiy Mokeyevich Markov, ƒrst secretary of the USSR Writers Union: “Thesphere of artistic creativity is an arena of keenest ideological struggle . . . True patriotsof their socialist homeland, our literary and artistic ƒgures . . . are heralds ofpeace and progess and ƒghters against all forms of reaction and fascism. Socialist re-
- Page 170 and 171: 9Truth Unveiled:The Portrait NudeIn
- Page 172 and 173: Truth Unveiled / 149school, where s
- Page 174 and 175: Truth Unveiled / 151Nadya’s „es
- Page 176 and 177: Truth Unveiled / 153Nadya’s addic
- Page 178 and 179: Truth Unveiled / 155hand, Gold’s
- Page 180 and 181: Truth Unveiled / 157others were doi
- Page 182 and 183: Truth Unveiled / 159are played woul
- Page 184 and 185: in time—two ladies sitting in umb
- Page 186 and 187: Shifting Constellations / 163which
- Page 188 and 189: Shifting Constellations / 165was a
- Page 190 and 191: Shifting Constellations / 167liefs,
- Page 192 and 193: Shifting Constellations / 169origin
- Page 194 and 195: Shifting Constellations / 171ing ch
- Page 196 and 197: Shifting Constellations / 173by the
- Page 198 and 199: Shifting Constellations / 175void b
- Page 200 and 201: NOTESIntroduction. The Portrait Gal
- Page 202 and 203: Notes / 1793. Emile de Antonio and
- Page 204 and 205: Notes / 18143. Gombrich, “The Exp
- Page 206 and 207: Notes / 183that the book is ƒnishe
- Page 208 and 209: Notes / 185into a language of tempe
- Page 210 and 211: Notes / 187only one repeated entry,
- Page 212 and 213: Notes / 18974. J.L., “New Exhibit
- Page 214 and 215: Notes / 191from the 1930s through t
- Page 216 and 217: Notes / 193a man (who loves childre
- Page 220 and 221: Notes / 197alist art, permeated by
- Page 222 and 223: Notes / 19929. Morris Dickstein, Ga
- Page 224 and 225: Notes / 201portrait of the boyish W
- Page 226 and 227: Notes / 203world gossip.” David B
- Page 228 and 229: Notes / 205which had refused to par
- Page 230 and 231: Notes / 207Eating and Identity (198
- Page 232 and 233: Notes / 20925. Georges Bataille, Th
- Page 234 and 235: Notes / 21110. William S. Rubin, Da
- Page 236 and 237: BIBLIOGRAPHYI. Archival Sources and
- Page 238 and 239: Sources Focused on Alice Neel / 215
- Page 240 and 241: Sources Focused on Alice Neel / 217
- Page 242 and 243: General Sources: Books / 219Storr,
- Page 244 and 245: General Sources: Books / 221Chodoro
- Page 246 and 247: General Sources: Books / 223——
- Page 248 and 249: General Sources: Books / 225Leja, M
- Page 250 and 251: General Sources: Books / 227Rich, A
- Page 252 and 253: General Sources: Periodicals / 229W
- Page 254 and 255: General Sources: Periodicals / 231M
- Page 256: PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITSeeva-inkeri: ƒg
196 / Notesof Sam Putnam, Joe Gould, and Kenneth Fearing, and which Neel herself reviewedfor the Daily World. Alice Neel, “WPA Writers Project Seen as Success, DespiteRightists,” Daily World, November 11, 1972. She was included in importantexhibitions such as the extensive “New York City WPA Art” at the Parsons Schoolof Design in 1977, Patricia Hills’s “Social Concern and Urban Realism” in 1983,and “Women Artists of the New Deal” at the National Musem of Women in theArts in 1988. She was also included in exhibitions of the politics of the 1930s to the1950s: Irving Howe’s “Images of Labor” (1981); Philip S. Foner and ReinhardSchultz’s “The Other America: Art and the Labour Movement in the UnitedStates” (1985, Germany); and Rob A. Okun’s “Unknown Secrets: Art and the RosenbergEra” (1988). The Foner-Schultz exhibit included Nazis Murder Jews, UneedaBiscuit Strike, and Pat Whalen.91. Typescript (undated) by Anton Refregier of Foreword to catalog of “AmericanArtists Gift Exhibition.” ACA gallery papers, Archives of American Art, D304, 1093.Among the artists in the exhibition were Anton Refregier, Philip Evergood, FredEllis, William Gropper, Frank Kleinholz, Joseph Hirsch, Alex Dobkin, Sarai Sherman,Abram Tromka, Antoney Toney, Mervyn Jules, Charles Keller, RockwellKent, Raphael Soyer, Abraham Harriton, Moses Soyer, Philip Reisman, MorrisKriensky, Gerrit Hondius, Gladys Rockmore Davis, Nicoli Cikovsky, Neel, HarryGottlieb, David Burliuk, and Paul Sample. Neel’s statement for the brochure emphasizedher Spanish Harlem work: “I live . . . in a neighborhood where there aremany Puerto Ricans and I have painted many pictures of them. I have painted theold and the young, the young writers and poets, and the working people” (3).92. From the Moscow Writer’s Union in 1959 he wrote: “You asked me to tell you thereal truth about the U.S.S.R.—as far as I am concerned, I am quite at home here.”Neel correspondence, Neel Arts, New York City.93. For example, Eva Cockcroft, 1974; David and Cecile Schapiro, 1977; Serge Guilbaut,1980; the authors are not speciƒcally cited, however. [Philip Bonosky, Introduction],“Alice Neel,” exhibition catalog, Soviet Artists Union, July 9–31, 1981;trans. Thompson Bradley (Russian to English), typescript, Neel Arts, New York City.94. In her interview with Susan Ortega, Neel echoed Bonosky: “The Soviet Unionwants peace and friendship and Brezhnev has offered any number of times to talk tothis country . . . This country is now warlike and a threat to the world. Reagan saidthe government doesn’t owe anybody anything. In the Soviet Union you get freemedical care—everything is free. There the government owes you everything.” SusanOrtega, “Art for Detente,” [1981], Daily World. Neel scrapbook 4, Neel Arts,New York City.95. An editorial, “United, Multinational,” published in Pravda on May 19, anticipatedthe tedious speechmaking that would take place six weeks later at the Seventh RepublicWriters Congress at the Writers Union, which coincidentally opened onJune 30, one week before Neel’s exhibit opened at the Artists Union. As articulatedby Georgiy Mokeyevich Markov, ƒrst secretary of the USSR Writers Union: “Thesphere of artistic creativity is an arena of keenest ideological struggle . . . True patriotsof their socialist homeland, our literary and artistic ƒgures . . . are heralds ofpeace and progess and ƒghters against all forms of reaction and fascism. Socialist re-