i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository
The Women’s Wing / 141There exist but a few hints in Neel’s art of an interest in exploring the relationbetween the culture’s lesbian stereotype and the complicated issue of lesbianidentity that she had consistently addressed in her portraits of gay men.Certainly there are no paintings from the 1970s that celebrate lesbian activismin the way that John Perreault does gay liberation. Nor did Neel provide anyverbal commentary on the increasingly visible efforts of lesbian women artistsover the course of the decade. This absence may in part be explained by thefact that what one might term a lesbian sensibility in contemporary art did notemerge until the very end of Neel’s life. The symbiotic relationship describedby D’Emilio between gay liberation and women’s liberation was, ironicallyenough, not immediately extended to gay women. 57 It was not until 1980 thata “movement,” in the sense of a signiƒcant number of artists addressing thetopic, can be said to have been established. 58 The portrait of Garrard is an indicatorof the tentative emergence of that sensibility.Neel offers two alternatives to her artworld androgynes, both young and old:the fecund ƒgure of Faith Ringgold (1978, ƒg. 136) and the „amboyant one ofHungarian-born multimedia artist Sari Dienes (1898–1992) (1976, ƒg. 137).In a portrait as coloristically magniƒcent as Neel’s portrait of Nochlin, Ringgoldis the embodiment of the 1960s phrase “Black Is Beautiful.” Neel emphasizesthe splendor of Ringgold’s ethnic dress by tipping the familiar tub chairforward to suggest the round ceremonial stools used by leaders of Africantribes. Splendidly arrayed in her red costume, Ringgold represents the changein the formulation of racial identity in the 1970s from black (skin color) toAfrican American (ethnicity). In contrast to Neel’s contemporary portrait ofthe African businessman Kanuthia (1973, ƒg. 138), whose neckless head appearsglued onto his tan, western-style, business suit, Ringgold takes pride inadopting African fabric art as a sign of her cultural heritage. Kanuthia, rigid inhis corporate attire, becomes a “suit,” the representative of Western colonialismin Africa. Ringgold is an African American, Kanuthia an AmericanizedAfrican. Each uses dress rather than skin color to establish identity.Like Neel, Sari Dienes was a role model for feminist artists, and becausea number of them, including Martha Edelheit, had painted portraits of her,Dienes’s dealer at the Buchfer/Harpsichord gallery planned to include a selectionin her 1976 exhibit there. Neel agreed to contribute a portrait as well, anddepicted the seventy-eight-year-old artist, two years Neel’s senior, garbed in amulticolored muumuu, in full bloom. Smiling as if in delight at her clownishappearance, she is the bawdy comedienne, whose self-presentation need nolonger contain any element of irony or anger, for she is past the age where criticalopinion or neglect can harm her. An artworld Persephone, she has been reborninto a vital, springlike old age; the red, purple, and green polka dots onher caftan have the bold simplicity of Matisse’s late cutouts. Neither a Great
142 / The New York Art NetworkGoddess or a Wonderwoman, Dienes is an older artist who exudes creative energy.In this sitter, Neel found a kindred spirit.Dienes wrote that “Bones, lint, Styrofoam, banana skins, the squishes andsquashes found on the street: nothing is so humble that it cannot be made intoart.” 59 Although not widely known to the general public, Dienes, who hadstudied with Fernand Léger, André Lhote, and Henry Moore in Paris andLondon, was a ƒxture on the New York art scene. The artistic pluralism andthe political climate of the 1970s brought into the mainstream four new artistictypologies: the gay male androgyne, the African American, the militantfeminist, and the „amboyant elderly female, represented by Perreault, Ringgold,Garrard, and Dienes respectively.The last of her elderly artworld matriarchs was Neel herself, presentedin her natural element: as a painter. (Self-Portrait, 1980, ƒg. 139). The selfportraitis a standard modernist subject, but a portrait of a painter who is anaked, eighty-year-old woman is not, and so the effect is initially comic: everthe bawdy woman, her antic makes us laugh at this breach of conventionalbarriers. Yet unlike the one obvious precedent, the octogenarian Picasso, wizenedbut still horny in his 347 suite from 1968, Neel presents a noneroticizedbody shocking only because what is supposed to be a source of disgust andshame is merely old. Because Neel’s aged body is so schematically rendered,its grotesque or pathetic implications are minimized, and its current conditiongranted limited relevance to the task at hand.With this summary work, Neel quite deliberately places herself in art historythrough citation. The pose is based on Rembrandt’s well-known etching,Woman Seated On a Mound (1631), and the lava-like cone of her „esh out ofwhich her head spews with such force recalls Rodin’s Balzac (1897). Yet whileBalzac’s towering form is absorbed in contemplation, Neel, like Eakins beforeher, presents herself as a worker, holding her brush with the authority Eakinsaccorded Dr. Gross’s scalpel. Passing across her heart, it is a lifeline, pointingboth to her lineage (realism) and to her legacy (feminist art). She had spent alifetime creating her own comédie humaine, which she presents as a product ofhuman effort, created in the shadow of past art history. Although her „esh issagging, her brush creates a boundary between her head and her body, demarcatingthe triumph of mind over matter. Although elderly, she is still a productivelaborer. In The Coming of Age, her pessimistic account of the inevitablemiseries of old age, Simone de Beauvoir reserved special praise for the old personwhose world remains “inhabited by projects: then, busy and useful, he escapesboth from boredom and from decay.” 60 Neel personiƒes proliƒc old age,and she might have added that, for a woman released from caretaking responsibilities,from the body’s reproductive demands, and from any accusations ofantisocial behavior, the last stage of life represents the ƒnal liberation.
- Page 113 and 114: 6El Barrio:Portrait of Spanish Harl
- Page 115 and 116: 92 / Neel’s Social Realist Arttha
- Page 117 and 118: 94 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtSuc
- Page 119 and 120: 96 / Neel’s Social Realist Artwhe
- Page 121 and 122: 98 / Neel’s Social Realist Artcal
- Page 123 and 124: 100 / Neel’s Social Realist Artte
- Page 125 and 126: 102 / Neel’s Social Realist Artar
- Page 127 and 128: 104 / Neel’s Social Realist Artun
- Page 129 and 130: 106 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtPu
- Page 131 and 132: 108 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtWh
- Page 134 and 135: 7A Gallery of Players:Artist-Critic
- Page 136 and 137: A Gallery of Players / 113be lost a
- Page 138 and 139: A Gallery of Players / 115Campbell
- Page 140 and 141: A Gallery of Players / 117on Neel
- Page 142 and 143: A Gallery of Players / 119sidered b
- Page 144 and 145: A Gallery of Players / 121is a disr
- Page 146 and 147: A Gallery of Players / 123Neel’s
- Page 148 and 149: A Gallery of Players / 125“Batman
- Page 150 and 151: 8The Women’s Wing:Neel and Femini
- Page 152 and 153: The Women’s Wing / 129Neel’s ƒ
- Page 154 and 155: The Women’s Wing / 131just and bi
- Page 156 and 157: The Women’s Wing / 133lenced the
- Page 158 and 159: The Women’s Wing / 135holding han
- Page 160 and 161: The Women’s Wing / 137historical
- Page 162 and 163: The Women’s Wing / 139“Three Am
- Page 166: The Women’s Wing / 143Looking bac
- Page 170 and 171: 9Truth Unveiled:The Portrait NudeIn
- Page 172 and 173: Truth Unveiled / 149school, where s
- Page 174 and 175: Truth Unveiled / 151Nadya’s „es
- Page 176 and 177: Truth Unveiled / 153Nadya’s addic
- Page 178 and 179: Truth Unveiled / 155hand, Gold’s
- Page 180 and 181: Truth Unveiled / 157others were doi
- Page 182 and 183: Truth Unveiled / 159are played woul
- Page 184 and 185: in time—two ladies sitting in umb
- Page 186 and 187: Shifting Constellations / 163which
- Page 188 and 189: Shifting Constellations / 165was a
- Page 190 and 191: Shifting Constellations / 167liefs,
- Page 192 and 193: Shifting Constellations / 169origin
- Page 194 and 195: Shifting Constellations / 171ing ch
- Page 196 and 197: Shifting Constellations / 173by the
- Page 198 and 199: Shifting Constellations / 175void b
- Page 200 and 201: NOTESIntroduction. The Portrait Gal
- Page 202 and 203: Notes / 1793. Emile de Antonio and
- Page 204 and 205: Notes / 18143. Gombrich, “The Exp
- Page 206 and 207: Notes / 183that the book is ƒnishe
- Page 208 and 209: Notes / 185into a language of tempe
- Page 210 and 211: Notes / 187only one repeated entry,
- Page 212 and 213: Notes / 18974. J.L., “New Exhibit
The Women’s Wing / 141There exist but a few hints in Neel’s art of an interest in exploring the relationbetween the culture’s lesbian stereotype and the complicated issue of lesbianidentity that she had consistently addressed in her portraits of gay men.Certainly there are no paintings from the 1970s that celebrate lesbian activismin the way that John Perreault does gay liberation. Nor did Neel provide anyverbal commentary on the increasingly visible efforts of lesbian women artistsover the course of the decade. This absence may in part be explained by thefact that what one might term a lesbian sensibility in contemporary art did notemerge until the very end of Neel’s life. The symbiotic relationship describedby D’Emilio between gay liberation and women’s liberation was, ironicallyenough, not immediately extended to gay women. 57 It was not until 1980 thata “movement,” in the sense of a signiƒcant number of artists addressing thetopic, can be said to have been established. 58 The portrait of Garrard is an indicatorof the tentative emergence of that sensibility.Neel offers two alternatives to her artworld androgynes, both young and old:the fecund ƒgure of Faith Ringgold (1978, ƒg. 136) and the „amboyant one ofHungarian-born multimedia artist Sari Dienes (1898–1992) (1976, ƒg. 137).In a portrait as coloristically magniƒcent as Neel’s portrait of Nochlin, Ringgoldis the embodiment of the 1960s phrase “Black Is Beautiful.” Neel emphasizesthe splendor of Ringgold’s ethnic dress by tipping the familiar tub chairforward to suggest the round ceremonial stools used by leaders of Africantribes. Splendidly arrayed in her red costume, Ringgold represents the changein the formulation of racial identity in the 1970s from black (skin color) toAfrican American (ethnicity). In contrast to Neel’s contemporary portrait ofthe African businessman Kanuthia (1973, ƒg. 138), whose neckless head appearsglued onto his tan, western-style, business suit, Ringgold takes pride inadopting African fabric art as a sign of her cultural heritage. Kanuthia, rigid inhis corporate attire, becomes a “suit,” the representative of Western colonialismin Africa. Ringgold is an African American, Kanuthia an AmericanizedAfrican. Each uses dress rather than skin color to establish identity.Like Neel, Sari Dienes was a role model for feminist artists, and becausea number of them, including Martha Edelheit, had painted portraits of her,Dienes’s dealer at the Buchfer/Harpsichord gallery planned to include a selectionin her 1976 exhibit there. Neel agreed to contribute a portrait as well, anddepicted the seventy-eight-year-old artist, two years Neel’s senior, garbed in amulticolored muumuu, in full bloom. Smiling as if in delight at her clownishappearance, she is the bawdy comedienne, whose self-presentation need nolonger contain any element of irony or anger, for she is past the age where criticalopinion or neglect can harm her. An artworld Persephone, she has been reborninto a vital, springlike old age; the red, purple, and green polka dots onher caftan have the bold simplicity of Matisse’s late cutouts. Neither a Great