i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

bir.brandeis.edu
from bir.brandeis.edu More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

The Women’s Wing / 141There exist but a few hints in Neel’s art of an interest in exploring the relationbetween the culture’s lesbian stereotype and the complicated issue of lesbianidentity that she had consistently addressed in her portraits of gay men.Certainly there are no paintings from the 1970s that celebrate lesbian activismin the way that John Perreault does gay liberation. Nor did Neel provide anyverbal commentary on the increasingly visible efforts of lesbian women artistsover the course of the decade. This absence may in part be explained by thefact that what one might term a lesbian sensibility in contemporary art did notemerge until the very end of Neel’s life. The symbiotic relationship describedby D’Emilio between gay liberation and women’s liberation was, ironicallyenough, not immediately extended to gay women. 57 It was not until 1980 thata “movement,” in the sense of a signiƒcant number of artists addressing thetopic, can be said to have been established. 58 The portrait of Garrard is an indicatorof the tentative emergence of that sensibility.Neel offers two alternatives to her artworld androgynes, both young and old:the fecund ƒgure of Faith Ringgold (1978, ƒg. 136) and the „amboyant one ofHungarian-born multimedia artist Sari Dienes (1898–1992) (1976, ƒg. 137).In a portrait as coloristically magniƒcent as Neel’s portrait of Nochlin, Ringgoldis the embodiment of the 1960s phrase “Black Is Beautiful.” Neel emphasizesthe splendor of Ringgold’s ethnic dress by tipping the familiar tub chairforward to suggest the round ceremonial stools used by leaders of Africantribes. Splendidly arrayed in her red costume, Ringgold represents the changein the formulation of racial identity in the 1970s from black (skin color) toAfrican American (ethnicity). In contrast to Neel’s contemporary portrait ofthe African businessman Kanuthia (1973, ƒg. 138), whose neckless head appearsglued onto his tan, western-style, business suit, Ringgold takes pride inadopting African fabric art as a sign of her cultural heritage. Kanuthia, rigid inhis corporate attire, becomes a “suit,” the representative of Western colonialismin Africa. Ringgold is an African American, Kanuthia an AmericanizedAfrican. Each uses dress rather than skin color to establish identity.Like Neel, Sari Dienes was a role model for feminist artists, and becausea number of them, including Martha Edelheit, had painted portraits of her,Dienes’s dealer at the Buchfer/Harpsichord gallery planned to include a selectionin her 1976 exhibit there. Neel agreed to contribute a portrait as well, anddepicted the seventy-eight-year-old artist, two years Neel’s senior, garbed in amulticolored muumuu, in full bloom. Smiling as if in delight at her clownishappearance, she is the bawdy comedienne, whose self-presentation need nolonger contain any element of irony or anger, for she is past the age where criticalopinion or neglect can harm her. An artworld Persephone, she has been reborninto a vital, springlike old age; the red, purple, and green polka dots onher caftan have the bold simplicity of Matisse’s late cutouts. Neither a Great

142 / The New York Art NetworkGoddess or a Wonderwoman, Dienes is an older artist who exudes creative energy.In this sitter, Neel found a kindred spirit.Dienes wrote that “Bones, lint, Styrofoam, banana skins, the squishes andsquashes found on the street: nothing is so humble that it cannot be made intoart.” 59 Although not widely known to the general public, Dienes, who hadstudied with Fernand Léger, André Lhote, and Henry Moore in Paris andLondon, was a ƒxture on the New York art scene. The artistic pluralism andthe political climate of the 1970s brought into the mainstream four new artistictypologies: the gay male androgyne, the African American, the militantfeminist, and the „amboyant elderly female, represented by Perreault, Ringgold,Garrard, and Dienes respectively.The last of her elderly artworld matriarchs was Neel herself, presentedin her natural element: as a painter. (Self-Portrait, 1980, ƒg. 139). The selfportraitis a standard modernist subject, but a portrait of a painter who is anaked, eighty-year-old woman is not, and so the effect is initially comic: everthe bawdy woman, her antic makes us laugh at this breach of conventionalbarriers. Yet unlike the one obvious precedent, the octogenarian Picasso, wizenedbut still horny in his 347 suite from 1968, Neel presents a noneroticizedbody shocking only because what is supposed to be a source of disgust andshame is merely old. Because Neel’s aged body is so schematically rendered,its grotesque or pathetic implications are minimized, and its current conditiongranted limited relevance to the task at hand.With this summary work, Neel quite deliberately places herself in art historythrough citation. The pose is based on Rembrandt’s well-known etching,Woman Seated On a Mound (1631), and the lava-like cone of her „esh out ofwhich her head spews with such force recalls Rodin’s Balzac (1897). Yet whileBalzac’s towering form is absorbed in contemplation, Neel, like Eakins beforeher, presents herself as a worker, holding her brush with the authority Eakinsaccorded Dr. Gross’s scalpel. Passing across her heart, it is a lifeline, pointingboth to her lineage (realism) and to her legacy (feminist art). She had spent alifetime creating her own comédie humaine, which she presents as a product ofhuman effort, created in the shadow of past art history. Although her „esh issagging, her brush creates a boundary between her head and her body, demarcatingthe triumph of mind over matter. Although elderly, she is still a productivelaborer. In The Coming of Age, her pessimistic account of the inevitablemiseries of old age, Simone de Beauvoir reserved special praise for the old personwhose world remains “inhabited by projects: then, busy and useful, he escapesboth from boredom and from decay.” 60 Neel personiƒes proliƒc old age,and she might have added that, for a woman released from caretaking responsibilities,from the body’s reproductive demands, and from any accusations ofantisocial behavior, the last stage of life represents the ƒnal liberation.

The Women’s Wing / 141There exist but a few hints in Neel’s art of an interest in exploring the relationbetween the culture’s lesbian stereotype and the complicated issue of lesbianidentity that she had consistently addressed in her portraits of gay men.Certainly there are no paintings from the 1970s that celebrate lesbian activismin the way that John Perreault does gay liberation. Nor did Neel provide anyverbal commentary on the increasingly visible efforts of lesbian women artistsover the course of the decade. This absence may in part be explained by thefact that what one might term a lesbian sensibility in contemporary art did notemerge until the very end of Neel’s life. The symbiotic relationship describedby D’Emilio between gay liberation and women’s liberation was, ironicallyenough, not immediately extended to gay women. 57 It was not until 1980 thata “movement,” in the sense of a signiƒcant number of artists addressing thetopic, can be said to have been established. 58 The portrait of Garrard is an indicatorof the tentative emergence of that sensibility.Neel offers two alternatives to her artworld androgynes, both young and old:the fecund ƒgure of Faith Ringgold (1978, ƒg. 136) and the „amboyant one ofHungarian-born multimedia artist Sari Dienes (1898–1992) (1976, ƒg. 137).In a portrait as coloristically magniƒcent as Neel’s portrait of Nochlin, Ringgoldis the embodiment of the 1960s phrase “Black Is Beautiful.” Neel emphasizesthe splendor of Ringgold’s ethnic dress by tipping the familiar tub chairforward to suggest the round ceremonial stools used by leaders of Africantribes. Splendidly arrayed in her red costume, Ringgold represents the changein the formulation of racial identity in the 1970s from black (skin color) toAfrican American (ethnicity). In contrast to Neel’s contemporary portrait ofthe African businessman Kanuthia (1973, ƒg. 138), whose neckless head appearsglued onto his tan, western-style, business suit, Ringgold takes pride inadopting African fabric art as a sign of her cultural heritage. Kanuthia, rigid inhis corporate attire, becomes a “suit,” the representative of Western colonialismin Africa. Ringgold is an African American, Kanuthia an AmericanizedAfrican. Each uses dress rather than skin color to establish identity.Like Neel, Sari Dienes was a role model for feminist artists, and becausea number of them, including Martha Edelheit, had painted portraits of her,Dienes’s dealer at the Buchfer/Harpsichord gallery planned to include a selectionin her 1976 exhibit there. Neel agreed to contribute a portrait as well, anddepicted the seventy-eight-year-old artist, two years Neel’s senior, garbed in amulticolored muumuu, in full bloom. Smiling as if in delight at her clownishappearance, she is the bawdy comedienne, whose self-presentation need nolonger contain any element of irony or anger, for she is past the age where criticalopinion or neglect can harm her. An artworld Persephone, she has been reborninto a vital, springlike old age; the red, purple, and green polka dots onher caftan have the bold simplicity of Matisse’s late cutouts. Neither a Great

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!