i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository i-xxii Front matter.qxd - Brandeis Institutional Repository

bir.brandeis.edu
from bir.brandeis.edu More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

El Barrio / 107tion was shifting, and she began to move artistically from the community ofSpanish Harlem to the New York art network.In 1962, Neel moved to a more middle-class neighborhood on West 107thStreet and Broadway near Columbia University. Her view out the window nowpermitted a wider vista, and her cityscapes began to include the street life thatshe had until then treated as a separate subject. In the Death and Life of theGreat American Cities (1961), the sociologist Jane Jacobs observed that at thistime the neighborhood around Neel’s apartment on the Upper West Side wasa prime example of the kind of diversity of architectural functions and populationsshe argued were essential to civic health.People’s love of watching activity and other people is constantly evident in citieseverywhere. This trait reaches an almost ludicrous extreme on upper Broadway inNew York, where the street is divided by a narrow central mall, right in the middleof trafƒc . . . [O]n any day when the weather is even barely tolerable these benchesare ƒlled with people for block after block . . . Eventually Broadway reachesColumbia University and Barnard College . . . Here all is obvious order and quiet.No more stores, no more activity generated by the stores, almost no more pedestrianscrossing—and no more watchers. 41For Jacobs, it was the “watchers,” both on the streets and in their apartments,who through their informal monitoring discouraged crime and encouraged asense of community and neighborhood.The publication of Jacobs’s book coincided with Neel’s move to the WestSide. Although she may not have been aware of Jacobs’s argument that thesafety of the sidewalks—secured not by the law but by the inhabitants—is onekey to a habitable city, nonetheless, in the 1960s her cityscapes do broaden outfrom the constricted lives of the poor to include the interaction of various economiclevels and occupations. In an interview from 1980, Neel described herselfas a watcher, although what catches her eye remains the life of the disadvantaged:I really live out my front room windows, which face up Broadway from 107thStreet. It’s like having a street in your living room . . . Since I’ve always been claustrophobic,it is a great escape for me not to feel shut up in a room. From my West EndAvenue window I can see Strauss Park, shaped like a violin with a fountain, andgingko trees. There is one man, a bum, who is there every morning . . . Then hegoes and sits on a stone bench on the Broadway center strip and nurses [his beer]the way the rest of us nurse our breakfast coffee . . . The center strip is like his livingroom. 42

108 / Neel’s Social Realist ArtWhen Neel painted her view of Strauss Park she avoided slumming: the bumand his beer are not included. In Snow (1967, ƒg. 99), a large, unin„ected greyground conveys the dead light of midwinter, but the lea„ess branches of thetree outside Neel’s window seem to reach with all the kinetic energy of aKabuki dancer for the linear tracery of the park’s gingko trees. Even under theconstriction of the snow, the paint seems to rise through the vertically multiplyingelements like blood through capillaries. Life, in muted form, still persists,and in a less tenuous form than that symbolized by the tattered rag hangingfrom the window of the East Side tenement.The greater size and charm of the later cityscapes thus modulates their keyand, with it, their associations to class. Neel’s 107th and Broadway (1976, ƒg.100) is indebted to Hopper not simply in style but now in content as well. Theshadow of death passes across the façade, slowly obliterating the brightness ofa summer afternoon. However, the deliberate fusion of interior and exterior,self and nonself that Neel created in Fire Escape is split apart in the later work,where the building is given a uniƒed volume onto which the shadow is cast.“That was Death, of course, creeping over here,” Neel told Hills, and Neel’smortality may well have been uppermost in her mind, as she had recently hada pacemaker installed. As Hopper does in his work, Neel projects her personalanxieties onto the building in a direct analogy lacking the complex social commentaryof her earlier tenement façades, where interior and exterior are laminated,one to the other.As Raymond Williams has observed, the City of Strangers that became emblematicof modernism has now been absorbed into mass culture, and the“isolated, estranged images of alienation and loss . . . have become the easyiconography of the commercials.” 43 Neel’s cityscapes from 1930 to 1960 exemplifythose exceptional works within the modernist tradition that replacethe alienated “I” with the disenfranchised “we,” suggesting that the boundariesof identity can only be established when crossed. By using the tenementfaçade to join the social body with its social space, creating a meeting groundof exterior and interior, Neel reconƒgured the spaces of modernism into acommunal art.

El Barrio / 107tion was shifting, and she began to move artistically from the community ofSpanish Harlem to the New York art network.In 1962, Neel moved to a more middle-class neighborhood on West 107thStreet and Broadway near Columbia University. Her view out the window nowpermitted a wider vista, and her cityscapes began to include the street life thatshe had until then treated as a separate subject. In the Death and Life of theGreat American Cities (1961), the sociologist Jane Jacobs observed that at thistime the neighborhood around Neel’s apartment on the Upper West Side wasa prime example of the kind of diversity of architectural functions and populationsshe argued were essential to civic health.People’s love of watching activity and other people is constantly evident in citieseverywhere. This trait reaches an almost ludicrous extreme on upper Broadway inNew York, where the street is divided by a narrow central mall, right in the middleof trafƒc . . . [O]n any day when the weather is even barely tolerable these benchesare ƒlled with people for block after block . . . Eventually Broadway reachesColumbia University and Barnard College . . . Here all is obvious order and quiet.No more stores, no more activity generated by the stores, almost no more pedestrianscrossing—and no more watchers. 41For Jacobs, it was the “watchers,” both on the streets and in their apartments,who through their informal monitoring discouraged crime and encouraged asense of community and neighborhood.The publication of Jacobs’s book coincided with Neel’s move to the WestSide. Although she may not have been aware of Jacobs’s argument that thesafety of the sidewalks—secured not by the law but by the inhabitants—is onekey to a habitable city, nonetheless, in the 1960s her cityscapes do broaden outfrom the constricted lives of the poor to include the interaction of various economiclevels and occupations. In an interview from 1980, Neel described herselfas a watcher, although what catches her eye remains the life of the disadvantaged:I really live out my front room windows, which face up Broadway from 107thStreet. It’s like having a street in your living room . . . Since I’ve always been claustrophobic,it is a great escape for me not to feel shut up in a room. From my West EndAvenue window I can see Strauss Park, shaped like a violin with a fountain, andgingko trees. There is one man, a bum, who is there every morning . . . Then hegoes and sits on a stone bench on the Broadway center strip and nurses [his beer]the way the rest of us nurse our breakfast coffee . . . The center strip is like his livingroom. 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!