Annex White book.pdf
Annex White book.pdf Annex White book.pdf
Cultivation activitiesWeed controlSurface grubbing and millingHarvestDate Amount Unit Value Sum (€)OctoberNovemberMarch27 Field treatment 10 270Flower harvesting November 75 Manual labor 10 750Pruning and drying November 200 Manual labor 10 2.000Bulb grubbingMay / June35 10 350Total cultivation activities 3.370REVENUESBulbs 400 13 5.200Saffron (10% humidity) 1 kg 4.000 4.000TOTAL REVENUE 9.200OverviewCosts 3.370Revenues 9.200Gross Profit 5.830Table 29. Production costs, revenues and gross profit for the year 4 inSardinia (1000m2 50-55 bulbs/m2)190
A5.1.1.4. Technical - economical indexesFollowing, a production analysis is presented according to the threemost important parameters: cultivation activities, raw material andlabor force. Three technical/ economical indexes have been determined:• Total expenses/ production costs (%): it represents the cost (in percentage)of the three analyzed parameters (cultivation activities, rawmaterial and labor force) in relation to the total production cost.• Main product equivalent / kg (%): it represents the amount (saffronin kg) produced by the costs created for each parameter (cultivationactivities, raw material and labor force).• Total expenses/ revenues (%): it represents the cost (in percentage)of the three analyzed parameters (cultivation activities, raw materialand labor force) in relation to total revenue.Italy Spain GreeceExpenses vs. total production costs (%) 100% 100% 100%Cultivation activities 11% 1% 2%Raw material 13% 31% 34%Labor force 75% 68% 64%Main product equivalent 3,5 45,7 49,6Cultivation activities 0,4 0,6 0,8Raw material 0,5 14,1 17,1Labor force 2,6 31,0 31,7Expenses vs. total revenue (%) 60% 81% 72%Cultivation activities 7% 1% 1%Raw material 8% 25% 25%Labor force 45% 55% 46%Table 30 Technical /economical indexes191
- Page 47 and 48: QUALITY DETERMINATIONTECHNIQUES IN
- Page 49 and 50: QUALITY DETERMINATIONTECHNIQUES IN
- Page 51 and 52: A4.1.1.2Determination through crude
- Page 53 and 54: A4.1.1.8extractsCrocine, picrocroci
- Page 55 and 56: FeaturesFeaturesI II IIIFlower resi
- Page 57 and 58: A4.1.2.3. Ashes non soluble in acid
- Page 59 and 60: A4.1.2.7 Ethereal extractEthereal e
- Page 61 and 62: Picture 5. UV-Vis absorption spectr
- Page 63 and 64: Technical specification for the use
- Page 65 and 66: A4.2 ORGANOLEPTIC ANALYSISOrganolep
- Page 67 and 68: The saffron is rated on a scale fro
- Page 69 and 70: A4.3 ADULTERATIONSDue to its high t
- Page 71 and 72: should be controlled and should be
- Page 73 and 74: Phase Duration (min) Phase A Phase
- Page 75 and 76: Picture 7. Chromatogram at 432 nm f
- Page 77 and 78: Seasonal phaseLengthInner diameterO
- Page 79: Salmonella identificationThe method
- Page 82 and 83: Flowers and stigmas (UCLM)
- Page 84 and 85: external cost - are not consumed in
- Page 86 and 87: Cultivation activitiesSoil preparat
- Page 88 and 89: Cultivation activitiesSoil preparat
- Page 90 and 91: Cultivation activitiesSoil preparat
- Page 92 and 93: Cultivation activitiesSoil preparat
- Page 94 and 95: Cultivation activitiesSurface ferti
- Page 96 and 97: Cultivation activitiesWeed controlS
- Page 100 and 101: A5.1.2 FEASIBILITY STUDYDynamic inv
- Page 102 and 103: A5.1.3.2ClassificationThe purchased
- Page 104 and 105: Following graphic demonstrates that
- Page 106 and 107: As one can clearly see in the graph
- Page 108 and 109: In Italy the total sales value in S
- Page 110 and 111: A5.2.5 A5.2.5 SAFFRON SALES DEPENDI
- Page 112 and 113: In Greece saffron is used as powder
- Page 115 and 116: BIBLIOGRAPHYAbdullaev, F.I., Frenke
- Page 117 and 118: of saffron plant (Crocus sativus L.
- Page 119 and 120: sativus L.), 183-207.Negbi, M.; Dag
- Page 121: Tarantilis, P. A.; Tsoupras G. and
A5.1.1.4. Technical - economical indexesFollowing, a production analysis is presented according to the threemost important parameters: cultivation activities, raw material andlabor force. Three technical/ economical indexes have been determined:• Total expenses/ production costs (%): it represents the cost (in percentage)of the three analyzed parameters (cultivation activities, rawmaterial and labor force) in relation to the total production cost.• Main product equivalent / kg (%): it represents the amount (saffronin kg) produced by the costs created for each parameter (cultivationactivities, raw material and labor force).• Total expenses/ revenues (%): it represents the cost (in percentage)of the three analyzed parameters (cultivation activities, raw materialand labor force) in relation to total revenue.Italy Spain GreeceExpenses vs. total production costs (%) 100% 100% 100%Cultivation activities 11% 1% 2%Raw material 13% 31% 34%Labor force 75% 68% 64%Main product equivalent 3,5 45,7 49,6Cultivation activities 0,4 0,6 0,8Raw material 0,5 14,1 17,1Labor force 2,6 31,0 31,7Expenses vs. total revenue (%) 60% 81% 72%Cultivation activities 7% 1% 1%Raw material 8% 25% 25%Labor force 45% 55% 46%Table 30 Technical /economical indexes191
Change language