The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University
The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University
newspaper. He settled on the name Golbach. He decided they could not have meantHamburg.“Further: ‘Four terrorists…’ Here! The author of the official version wanted to implythat all four terrorists were together from the beginning to the end—why is this necessary?It is clear. It allows them to not have to explain why the negotiator representing theterrorists, who was not in Room 117 during the rescue operation, was killed. We, and manyothers, know that he, safe and sound, turned himself in to Afghan security right away toinform the authorities of the terrorists’ demands and conditions for freeing theambassador. Yet he also was killed—for what? Common sense and law dictate that heshould have been investigated and put on trial. Fine, supposedly he was arrested andinterrogated. What if during the interrogation or trial he had said something that nobodycould anticipate? That was why he most probably was killed—to silence him.“Okay, further: ‘Captured the ambassador and forced the driver to take them toHotel Kabul.’ Strange. Why did Dubs allow the driver to stop the car in the first place? Whydid he open the car door? I am not an ambassador and even I, having a red diplomaticlicense plate, would not obey such an order from the transport policemen. This is highlypeculiar….“‘Hotel Kabul...’ It’s not the most convenient place for keeping the captured hostagelong term. On that day, hotel security was strengthened considerably due to an officialforeign delegation’s arrival. Right across from Room 117, thirty meters away, there is abalcony of a bank from which the hotel rooms can be clearly seen and shot at. It would havebeen more convenient and secure for the terrorists not to lock themselves in the hotelroom, but to stay in the car. That would allow them greater mobility. They could arrive312
where they needed, together with the ambassador, pick up their friend Badruddin Bahes,continue on, drop the ambassador off, and switch their car.“‘The professional security organs did their best to safely extricate the ambassadorfrom the claws of the terrorists. However, the terrorists did not allow that to happen.’ Afterall, who would admit that something was not done properly, or had been miscalculated?“‘The terrorists demanded someone by the name of Badruddin Bahes, a person whois not currently in Afghanistan, and whose whereabouts are unknown, to be released andbrought to them. Despite the ensuing negotiations, the terrorists continued to insist ontheir demand. However, it turned out to be unfeasible.’ Interesting why both sides had toplay dumb. Tarun certainly knew that the person whose release the terrorists haddemanded was not in Afghanistan. Why didn’t he ask the terrorists, ‘Tell me dear friends,where should I search for your Badruddin Bahes, and what would be the best way for me tobring him to you?’ Let’s suppose that Tarun was simply stalling for time. But what aboutthe terrorists? Why did they assume such a formal attitude toward their own demands?Why didn’t they keep asking the authorities how they were going about meeting theirconditions?“‘At about 12:30 p.m., the terrorists began to threaten to kill the ambassador if theirdemands were not met within ten minutes.’ It sounds as if they slept for three hours andsuddenly woke up. It’s interesting, how one can fulfill a demand in ten minutes, whichcould not be fulfilled in three hours. It’s just not serious. However, this lack of seriousnessdoesn’t match up with the drama of the moment. The lives of the ambassador and theterrorists were at stake. How can one not be serious in such a situation?313
- Page 262 and 263: Politburo superseded all protocol.
- Page 264 and 265: with obvious Soviet participation w
- Page 266 and 267: “I am working, Leonid Ilyich!”
- Page 268 and 269: Once, the professor and the future
- Page 270 and 271: As soon as they entered Dvoryankov
- Page 272 and 273: Khan, Valery treated Dvoryankov to
- Page 274 and 275: Sometimes, one should act extremely
- Page 276 and 277: ecame a colony of Britain. Afghan t
- Page 278 and 279: “Valery, do you think that we wou
- Page 280 and 281: in the committee by a bureaucrat fr
- Page 282 and 283: 300 Afghani, according to an exchan
- Page 284 and 285: The decree authorized the re-exprop
- Page 286 and 287: Having said goodbye to him, Valery
- Page 288 and 289: Nikolai Alexandrovich Dvoryankov di
- Page 290 and 291: American intelligence services, eve
- Page 292 and 293: ***Sergei Bakhturin, an assistant t
- Page 294 and 295: wife were staying in the room. Vese
- Page 296 and 297: On February 13, a reception in hono
- Page 298 and 299: to invite the archaeologist to spea
- Page 300 and 301: a little over two hours to fulfill
- Page 302 and 303: keep hostages in captivity. In othe
- Page 304 and 305: was discovered that the gas in the
- Page 306 and 307: “But how would the safety of Mr.
- Page 308 and 309: “But then you should realize that
- Page 310 and 311: are not as alert. People are more a
- Page 314 and 315: “‘The security operatives, havi
- Page 316 and 317: get inside his car? How can his cal
- Page 318 and 319: “Wipe your tears,” he said in a
- Page 320 and 321: differs from the way they think as
- Page 322 and 323: “He told me to pick up my cleats
- Page 324 and 325: describing what had transpired in H
- Page 326 and 327: “I wonder who this person is? I h
- Page 328 and 329: Starostin was not surprised by what
- Page 330 and 331: Badruddin Bahes was close to Muslim
- Page 332 and 333: nationalist and anti-Soviet. Howeve
- Page 334 and 335: while he ruminated, then stared abs
- Page 336 and 337: A: We failed to capture the terrori
- Page 338 and 339: Question from a correspondent of Th
- Page 340 and 341: flag on it. The U.S. ambassador was
- Page 342 and 343: 7. Who were the terrorists? It seem
- Page 344 and 345: perceived at the Center? It would s
- Page 346 and 347: Chapter 5:Rebellion in Herat - Firs
- Page 348 and 349: struggle had become a historical le
- Page 350 and 351: Revolution.“I understand that you
- Page 352 and 353: evolutionary, anti-party, and again
- Page 354 and 355: architectural monuments, and other
- Page 356 and 357: een assumed that the Soviets in Afg
- Page 358 and 359: “All of our leaders are waiting f
- Page 360 and 361: spoke with Amin,” Gromyko added.
where they needed, <strong>to</strong>gether with the ambassador, pick up their friend Badruddin Bahes,continue on, drop the ambassador off, and switch their car.“‘<strong>The</strong> professional security organs did their best <strong>to</strong> safely extricate the ambassadorfrom the claws of the terrorists. However, the terrorists did not allow that <strong>to</strong> happen.’ Afterall, who would admit that something was not done properly, or had been miscalculated?“‘<strong>The</strong> terrorists demanded someone by the name of Badruddin Bahes, a person whois not currently in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>, and whose whereabouts are unknown, <strong>to</strong> be released andbrought <strong>to</strong> them. Despite the ensuing negotiations, the terrorists continued <strong>to</strong> insist ontheir demand. However, it turned out <strong>to</strong> be unfeasible.’ Interesting why both sides had <strong>to</strong>play dumb. Tarun certainly knew that the person whose release the terrorists haddemanded was not in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>. Why didn’t he ask the terrorists, ‘Tell me dear friends,where should I search for your Badruddin Bahes, and what would be the best way for me <strong>to</strong>bring him <strong>to</strong> you?’ Let’s suppose that Tarun was simply stalling for time. But what aboutthe terrorists? Why did they assume such a formal attitude <strong>to</strong>ward their own demands?Why didn’t they keep asking the authorities how they were going about meeting theirconditions?“‘At about 12:30 p.m., the terrorists began <strong>to</strong> threaten <strong>to</strong> kill the ambassador if theirdemands were not met within ten minutes.’ It sounds as if they slept for three hours andsuddenly woke up. It’s interesting, how one can fulfill a demand in ten minutes, whichcould not be fulfilled in three hours. It’s just not serious. However, this lack of seriousnessdoesn’t match up with the drama of the moment. <strong>The</strong> lives of the ambassador and theterrorists were at stake. How can one not be serious in such a situation?313