The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University

The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University

13.07.2015 Views

newspaper. He settled on the name Golbach. He decided they could not have meantHamburg.“Further: ‘Four terrorists…’ Here! The author of the official version wanted to implythat all four terrorists were together from the beginning to the end—why is this necessary?It is clear. It allows them to not have to explain why the negotiator representing theterrorists, who was not in Room 117 during the rescue operation, was killed. We, and manyothers, know that he, safe and sound, turned himself in to Afghan security right away toinform the authorities of the terrorists’ demands and conditions for freeing theambassador. Yet he also was killed—for what? Common sense and law dictate that heshould have been investigated and put on trial. Fine, supposedly he was arrested andinterrogated. What if during the interrogation or trial he had said something that nobodycould anticipate? That was why he most probably was killed—to silence him.“Okay, further: ‘Captured the ambassador and forced the driver to take them toHotel Kabul.’ Strange. Why did Dubs allow the driver to stop the car in the first place? Whydid he open the car door? I am not an ambassador and even I, having a red diplomaticlicense plate, would not obey such an order from the transport policemen. This is highlypeculiar….“‘Hotel Kabul...’ It’s not the most convenient place for keeping the captured hostagelong term. On that day, hotel security was strengthened considerably due to an officialforeign delegation’s arrival. Right across from Room 117, thirty meters away, there is abalcony of a bank from which the hotel rooms can be clearly seen and shot at. It would havebeen more convenient and secure for the terrorists not to lock themselves in the hotelroom, but to stay in the car. That would allow them greater mobility. They could arrive312

where they needed, together with the ambassador, pick up their friend Badruddin Bahes,continue on, drop the ambassador off, and switch their car.“‘The professional security organs did their best to safely extricate the ambassadorfrom the claws of the terrorists. However, the terrorists did not allow that to happen.’ Afterall, who would admit that something was not done properly, or had been miscalculated?“‘The terrorists demanded someone by the name of Badruddin Bahes, a person whois not currently in Afghanistan, and whose whereabouts are unknown, to be released andbrought to them. Despite the ensuing negotiations, the terrorists continued to insist ontheir demand. However, it turned out to be unfeasible.’ Interesting why both sides had toplay dumb. Tarun certainly knew that the person whose release the terrorists haddemanded was not in Afghanistan. Why didn’t he ask the terrorists, ‘Tell me dear friends,where should I search for your Badruddin Bahes, and what would be the best way for me tobring him to you?’ Let’s suppose that Tarun was simply stalling for time. But what aboutthe terrorists? Why did they assume such a formal attitude toward their own demands?Why didn’t they keep asking the authorities how they were going about meeting theirconditions?“‘At about 12:30 p.m., the terrorists began to threaten to kill the ambassador if theirdemands were not met within ten minutes.’ It sounds as if they slept for three hours andsuddenly woke up. It’s interesting, how one can fulfill a demand in ten minutes, whichcould not be fulfilled in three hours. It’s just not serious. However, this lack of seriousnessdoesn’t match up with the drama of the moment. The lives of the ambassador and theterrorists were at stake. How can one not be serious in such a situation?313

where they needed, <strong>to</strong>gether with the ambassador, pick up their friend Badruddin Bahes,continue on, drop the ambassador off, and switch their car.“‘<strong>The</strong> professional security organs did their best <strong>to</strong> safely extricate the ambassadorfrom the claws of the terrorists. However, the terrorists did not allow that <strong>to</strong> happen.’ Afterall, who would admit that something was not done properly, or had been miscalculated?“‘<strong>The</strong> terrorists demanded someone by the name of Badruddin Bahes, a person whois not currently in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>, and whose whereabouts are unknown, <strong>to</strong> be released andbrought <strong>to</strong> them. Despite the ensuing negotiations, the terrorists continued <strong>to</strong> insist ontheir demand. However, it turned out <strong>to</strong> be unfeasible.’ Interesting why both sides had <strong>to</strong>play dumb. Tarun certainly knew that the person whose release the terrorists haddemanded was not in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>. Why didn’t he ask the terrorists, ‘Tell me dear friends,where should I search for your Badruddin Bahes, and what would be the best way for me <strong>to</strong>bring him <strong>to</strong> you?’ Let’s suppose that Tarun was simply stalling for time. But what aboutthe terrorists? Why did they assume such a formal attitude <strong>to</strong>ward their own demands?Why didn’t they keep asking the authorities how they were going about meeting theirconditions?“‘At about 12:30 p.m., the terrorists began <strong>to</strong> threaten <strong>to</strong> kill the ambassador if theirdemands were not met within ten minutes.’ It sounds as if they slept for three hours andsuddenly woke up. It’s interesting, how one can fulfill a demand in ten minutes, whichcould not be fulfilled in three hours. It’s just not serious. However, this lack of seriousnessdoesn’t match up with the drama of the moment. <strong>The</strong> lives of the ambassador and theterrorists were at stake. How can one not be serious in such a situation?313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!