The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University
The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University The Road to Afghanistan - George Washington University
Preparations for the first state visit were underway in Afghanistan. The text of theTreaty of Friendship, Good-Neighborliness, and Cooperation was discussed with Afghanleaders. When preparing the document, both sides were led by Lenin’s principles of theTreaty of 1921, which was signed by Soviet Russia and Afghanistan, with the addedconsiderations of the new reality. Experts honed the wording and argued aboutpunctuation. Ambassador Puzanov was constantly in touch with the Afghan Ministry ofInternational Affairs to keep the minister of foreign affairs abreast of the evolution of thedocument. Hafizullah Amin, leafing through the document, admired the culture of Sovietdiplomacy and the perfection of the translation into Dari, but didn’t seem to be particularlyinterested in the substance of the treaty. If the Soviets wrote the document, it must havebeen correct.The state leaders of Afghanistan didn’t particularly concern themselves with thistreaty, much like the other treaties they had previously signed. Afghans did not attachparticular significance to such papers and documents. They kept to the spirit of agreementsonly so long as it was to their benefit.Not only politicians were preparing for the visit. Officers of the Ninth Directorate ofthe KGB were researching the gastronomic preferences of Comrade Taraki and themembers of his delegation in order to organize their meals in Moscow accordingly. Itturned out that the arriving Afghans were not particularly fussy about cuisine. They dranktea in the morning and ate flatbread with goat cheese. For lunch they preferred vegetablesoup with carrots, onions, and turnips. In the evening they ate kerai—fried eggs with lamband onion. On special occasions, they would eat pilaf and shish kebab.252
A discussion regarding the languages to be used during the meetings was held, andit was decided that the leading Soviet experts in Dari, diplomats Dmitry Rurikov andStanislav Gavrilov, would handle interpretation during the meeting of the leaders. Theprotocol staff agreed on the ceremony for greeting the Afghan delegation at the airport anddiscussed what ties and sports jackets the leaders should wear.On November 27, a plenary session of the Central Committee of the PDPA was heldthat was supposed to mark the end of intra-party turmoil. The following day, the KabulTimes published an article about the event. The article contained the customary set ofideological clichés: “The plenary session is a historical step forward in the workers’movement”; “The plenary session demonstrated the PDPA’s commitment to proletarianinternationalism and the defense of global peace”; “The plenary was the expression of thebrilliant leadership of the party and of the people by Comrade Taraki.”Decree Number Eight of the Revolutionary Council of the DRA, “Regarding the Issueof Land Reform,” was discussed and approved. The most important goal of the meeting—todeliver a final blow to the Parchamis—was achieved. Seven members of the CentralCommittee and two members of the Revolutionary Council (Babrak Karmal, Nur AhmadNur, Keshtmand, Anahita Ratebzad, Baryalai, Vakil, Najib, Qadir, and Raffi) were officiallyexpelled from the PDPA, “for their participation in a traitorous plot against the Great AprilRevolution, the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, and our glorious party.” Four moremembers of the Central Committee were subjected to softer punishment; they werereduced in the rank from members to candidates, “in order to be re-educated based oncriticism and self-criticism.”253
- Page 202 and 203: should ask your colleagues to be mo
- Page 204 and 205: years earlier, he was offered a pos
- Page 206 and 207: “Vladimir Alexandrovich,” begge
- Page 208 and 209: he intended to play his own game. I
- Page 210 and 211: was so enamored by the ideology of
- Page 212 and 213: in Russian, “Do chego zhe mir tes
- Page 214 and 215: Starostin often would run into Frye
- Page 216 and 217: were to stay for another year or tw
- Page 218 and 219: “I think that, from the U.S. pers
- Page 220 and 221: leaders were convinced that the Sov
- Page 222 and 223: Thinking about Americans, Valery re
- Page 224 and 225: cannot, with full certainty, qualif
- Page 226 and 227: As Surnin predicted, a CIA operativ
- Page 228 and 229: wish was for them to make the Afgha
- Page 230 and 231: Listening to Boris Nikolayevich, Bo
- Page 232 and 233: until Bogdanov took the floor. He d
- Page 234 and 235: doubts as to the old Communist warr
- Page 236 and 237: simply didn’t have the means to o
- Page 238 and 239: one hand, there was truth to this s
- Page 240 and 241: auspices of the “National Pashtun
- Page 242 and 243: this version of events becomes the
- Page 244 and 245: Kryuchkov remained silent, digestin
- Page 246 and 247: ‘true communist’ and his friend
- Page 248 and 249: Babrak Karmal looked extremely conc
- Page 250 and 251: “Think, who could receive this Ba
- Page 254 and 255: The papers also published Comrade T
- Page 256 and 257: young people at the square, told th
- Page 258 and 259: influential Islamist organizations.
- Page 260 and 261: him as though considering their con
- Page 262 and 263: Politburo superseded all protocol.
- Page 264 and 265: with obvious Soviet participation w
- Page 266 and 267: “I am working, Leonid Ilyich!”
- Page 268 and 269: Once, the professor and the future
- Page 270 and 271: As soon as they entered Dvoryankov
- Page 272 and 273: Khan, Valery treated Dvoryankov to
- Page 274 and 275: Sometimes, one should act extremely
- Page 276 and 277: ecame a colony of Britain. Afghan t
- Page 278 and 279: “Valery, do you think that we wou
- Page 280 and 281: in the committee by a bureaucrat fr
- Page 282 and 283: 300 Afghani, according to an exchan
- Page 284 and 285: The decree authorized the re-exprop
- Page 286 and 287: Having said goodbye to him, Valery
- Page 288 and 289: Nikolai Alexandrovich Dvoryankov di
- Page 290 and 291: American intelligence services, eve
- Page 292 and 293: ***Sergei Bakhturin, an assistant t
- Page 294 and 295: wife were staying in the room. Vese
- Page 296 and 297: On February 13, a reception in hono
- Page 298 and 299: to invite the archaeologist to spea
- Page 300 and 301: a little over two hours to fulfill
A discussion regarding the languages <strong>to</strong> be used during the meetings was held, andit was decided that the leading Soviet experts in Dari, diplomats Dmitry Rurikov andStanislav Gavrilov, would handle interpretation during the meeting of the leaders. <strong>The</strong>pro<strong>to</strong>col staff agreed on the ceremony for greeting the Afghan delegation at the airport anddiscussed what ties and sports jackets the leaders should wear.On November 27, a plenary session of the Central Committee of the PDPA was heldthat was supposed <strong>to</strong> mark the end of intra-party turmoil. <strong>The</strong> following day, the KabulTimes published an article about the event. <strong>The</strong> article contained the cus<strong>to</strong>mary set ofideological clichés: “<strong>The</strong> plenary session is a his<strong>to</strong>rical step forward in the workers’movement”; “<strong>The</strong> plenary session demonstrated the PDPA’s commitment <strong>to</strong> proletarianinternationalism and the defense of global peace”; “<strong>The</strong> plenary was the expression of thebrilliant leadership of the party and of the people by Comrade Taraki.”Decree Number Eight of the Revolutionary Council of the DRA, “Regarding the Issueof Land Reform,” was discussed and approved. <strong>The</strong> most important goal of the meeting—<strong>to</strong>deliver a final blow <strong>to</strong> the Parchamis—was achieved. Seven members of the CentralCommittee and two members of the Revolutionary Council (Babrak Karmal, Nur AhmadNur, Keshtmand, Anahita Ratebzad, Baryalai, Vakil, Najib, Qadir, and Raffi) were officiallyexpelled from the PDPA, “for their participation in a trai<strong>to</strong>rous plot against the Great AprilRevolution, the Democratic Republic of <strong>Afghanistan</strong>, and our glorious party.” Four moremembers of the Central Committee were subjected <strong>to</strong> softer punishment; they werereduced in the rank from members <strong>to</strong> candidates, “in order <strong>to</strong> be re-educated based oncriticism and self-criticism.”253