13.07.2015 Views

Untitled - Heritage Foundation

Untitled - Heritage Foundation

Untitled - Heritage Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

National Conference of Kalyan Ashram Concluded at Ujjain, MP- Narayan Dev SarmaOn completion of 60 years of itsinception, the Akhil Bharatiya VanvasiKalyan Ashram has organised a grandconference inviting all the differentJanajati communities and socialworkers from across the nation on 24-26 Dec.2012 at Ujjain, the importantplace for pilgrimage. Some of thedelegates reached from the far-flungareas of Arunachal Pradesh by travelling5 days from their villages. 2335delegates from more than 400 differentJanajati communities from al the statesparticipated in their colourful attires.There were culturalpresentations,observation of rituals andpuja to exhibit how eachof the communities maketheir offerings to AlmightyGod and intellectualdiscussions on differenttopics. Beside the abovemany resolutions werealso passed in theConference to show its concern to theNation. An important resolution thatwas passed in the Karyakari Mandal(National Executive Committee) on‘Land Acquisition and MMDR Bill 2011’read as follows:‘Bill replacing the Land AcquisitionAct (LAAct), 1894 is underconsideration of the Parliament since2007 and the Mines and Minerals (Devand Regulation) MMDR Act, 1957 ispending since 2010. Vanvasi KalyanAshram (ABVKA) has resolved itsviews earlier on both these issues afterdue consideration but we areconsidering these again in view of freshdevelopments on the issue.‘Standing Committee of both thehouses has returned the LandAcquisition, Rehabilitation andResettlement (LAR&R) Bill, 2011 to thegovernment after long–deepdiscussions and deliberations whichhas been put on floor of the Lok-Sabhato replace the LAAct, 1894. ABVKAtoo raised many issues concerning theSTs and demanded necessaryamendments in the Bill and theCommittee accepted them. Followingare some of the provisions which haveundermined the interests of ScheduledTribe, in the bill which has, presently,been tabled.‘Provisions related to rehabilitationin this Bill will be applicable only if theland being purchased or acquired byPrivate Company is 50 Acres or morein the Urban Area and 100 Acres ormore in the Rural Area. Thisdiscrimination is unfair when we seethat basic resources like Water, Coal,Iron-ore and lime are available in therural areas, particularly in the tribalareas. Moreover, governments aregiving so many tax concessions andsimilar rebates in order to encourageindustrial development in such areas.Consequently, many mega-ancillaryindustries like Steel, Cement, Powergeneration and Mining are installing intribal areas at large scale. Thisparticular provision of the Bill will denybenefits to the Rural/Tribal PAPsbecause R&R package will not beprovided if the land being acquired is100 Acres,‘All the disputes arising in matterof LAR&R have been kept out of thejurisdiction of the existing Civil Courtsand Special Courts called Authority willhear them. Serving or Retired Judgesshall be appointed as Presiding Officers(POs) in these Authorities. “Number ofsuch Authorities in a State” and “everydistrict will have this Authority or not”,is not clear in the Bill. This will not onlyaffect independence and impartiality ofthe judiciary but the victims-thedisplaced people will have to roam outof their districts for justice and it isbound to be more hard and costly.‘KKM of the ABVKA thereforedemands the Central Government that:‘Provisions of protection andrehabilitation of the proposed law shouldbe applicable equally to the Rural andUrban Areas and discriminatory ceilingof 50 and 100 acres should be removed,when a private company purchase oracquire land.‘Only those Judges in Serviceshould be appointed as POs in theproposed Special Courts-the Authorityand make it sure that no victimdisplaced-affected person will have totravel out of his home district forjustice.‘In the case of R&RtheRehabilitationPackage, provisions ofthe proposed law shouldbe made applicable withretrospective date-thedate of the year 2007 onwhich the Bill was firstintroduced in the Lok-Sabha and‘Land Reforms should be made inTribal Areas across the country andall the STs should be issuedinstruments of Land-Rights (Patta) ina time bound manner.‘So far as MMDR Bill 2011 isconcerned, ABVKA wants to say thatprovisions of compensating ProjectAffected Persons (PAPs), due tomining, will be shared the profits in themining activities, have been proposedin order to compliance of the NationalMining Policy, 2008; directions of theApex Court in the Samatha VersusState of Andhra Pradesh (1997) and inline of similar principles of profit sharingfollowed in countries like Australia,Canada, USA, Norway, Botswana andPapua New Gunnies across the worldwhere they are sharing profits with thePAPs ranging from 20 to 30%.‘Growing opposition of peopleagainst indiscriminate land acquisitionand mining activities in tribal area,earning huge profits of billions ofrupees by these miners on one handand denial of two square meals of thePAPs whose land are being used for(Contd. to Page 6)<strong>Heritage</strong> Explorer 4 January 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!