13.07.2015 Views

genetic and ecological constraints on the origins ... - Nativefishlab.net

genetic and ecological constraints on the origins ... - Nativefishlab.net

genetic and ecological constraints on the origins ... - Nativefishlab.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONSTRAINTS ON UNISEXUAL VERTEBRATESunclear (Uzzell, 1970). We do not know what happens to <strong>the</strong>sperm pr<strong>on</strong>ucleus after activati<strong>on</strong> of gyno<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> eggs, or hownuclear fusi<strong>on</strong> is blocked. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we do not know howcleavage is activated in par<strong>the</strong>no<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> reptiles. The origin ofnew par<strong>the</strong>no<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> reptiles might be severely c<strong>on</strong>strainedbecause an endogenous mechanism to activate embryogenesismust arise simultaneously with a mechanism that circumventsnormal meiosis. Unless both mechanisms are byproductsof <strong>the</strong> same dysgenic event (e.g., hybridizati<strong>on</strong>), <strong>the</strong>origin of new par<strong>the</strong>nogens seems very unlikely. Despite <strong>the</strong>c<strong>on</strong>siderable effort over <strong>the</strong> past 50 years, fundamental cyto<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>to<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> processes are still unknown to us. Studiesof <strong>the</strong>se aberrant processes in unisexual organisms shouldserve as excellent tools for elucidating critical aspects of normalfertilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> early development.Hybrido<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> unisexuals also require sperm from males ofa related sexual species, but <strong>the</strong>y are not truly pseudogamous,because <strong>the</strong> egg <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sperm pr<strong>on</strong>ucleii fuse <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a true hybrid isformed. During hybrido<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> reproducti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> haploidmaternal genome is transmitted to <strong>the</strong> eggs without recombinati<strong>on</strong>(Schultz, 1969; Uzzell <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Berger, 1975; Graf <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Polls,this volume). This form of reproducti<strong>on</strong> has been called "hemicl<strong>on</strong>al"(Kailman, cit. in Vrijenhoek et al., 1977). Because hybridogensare also sperm-dependent, <strong>the</strong>y also suffer <strong>the</strong>pseudogamy c<strong>on</strong>straint.'lb appreciate <strong>the</strong> severity of this c<strong>on</strong>straint, we must imaginea pair of bisexual species with c<strong>on</strong>specific mating preferences.If, for example, interspecific matings occur <strong>on</strong>ce in every100 courtships, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> if <strong>the</strong> resulting unisexual hybrids are exactlyintermediate in <strong>the</strong>ir attractiveness to males, <strong>the</strong> hybridswould be mated <strong>on</strong>ce in every 50 courtships. It is difficultto imagine a pseudogamous form successfully invading a bisexualpopulati<strong>on</strong> under such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. Special behavioralc<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s must exist in <strong>the</strong> sexual host before pseudogamousunisexuals can become established. For example, traits involvedin mate selecti<strong>on</strong> might not be additive in some hybrids,placing <strong>the</strong> hybrids bey<strong>on</strong>d a critical mate-selecti<strong>on</strong>threshold. However, behavioral studies with Poeciliopsis revealedthat <strong>the</strong> situati<strong>on</strong> is more complex. The unisexuals exploit<strong>the</strong> dominance hierarchies formed by sexual males(McKay, 1971). Dominant males prevent subordinate malesfrom mating with <strong>the</strong> preferred bisexual females, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thus <strong>the</strong>subordinate males defer <strong>the</strong>ir mating attempts to unisexualfemales.Having invaded a bisexual populati<strong>on</strong>, pseudogamous unisexualsface a sec<strong>on</strong>d peril — <strong>the</strong> twofold advantage of allfemalereproducti<strong>on</strong> should lead to <strong>the</strong>ir own demise (Clant<strong>on</strong>,1934). Assuming unisexual <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> bisexual forms occupy equivalentniches, <strong>the</strong> unisexuals should rapidly replace <strong>the</strong> bisexuals,<strong>the</strong>reby eliminating <strong>the</strong>ir source of sperm. The persistenceof stable unisexual/bisexual complexes has beenexplored by several investigators (Uzzell, 1964, 1969; Moore<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> McKay, 1971; Moore, 1976, 1984; Kiester et al., 1981;Keegan-Rogers, 1984; Stenseth et al., 1985). Based <strong>on</strong> studiesof gyno<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> Poeciliopsis, Moore (1976) identified three factorsaffecting <strong>the</strong> dynamics of this simple host-parasite system:(1) primary fitness (i.e., fertility <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> survival), (2) <strong>the</strong> twofoldadvantage of all-female reproducti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> (3) afrequency-dependent mating preference <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> part of sexualmales. Assuming equal primary fitnesses <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> equal niches,Moore showed how factors 2 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3 could lead to a stable equilibriumbetween unisexual <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> bisexual forms. When bisexualindividuals predominate, <strong>the</strong> males establish dominancehierarchies, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> subordinate males mate with <strong>the</strong> unisexuals.As <strong>the</strong> unisexual females increase in frequency becauseof <strong>the</strong>ir twofold advantage, males become scarce. Solitarymales prefer <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>on</strong>specific bisexual females, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thus unisexualfemales have a low probability of inseminati<strong>on</strong>. At equilibrium<strong>the</strong> two-fold advantage of unisexuals is balanced by<strong>the</strong>ir lowered mating success. The c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s necessary forstable coexistence between a sperm parasite <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> its sexualhost are restrictive (Stenseth et al., 1985; Kirkendall <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Stenseth, 1988). Some form of density- or frequencydependent,unisexual mating success appears to be a generalrequirement. Also, <strong>the</strong> assumpti<strong>on</strong>s of equal primary fitnesses<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> completely overlapping <str<strong>on</strong>g>ecological</str<strong>on</strong>g> niches are probably unrealistic(Vrijenhoek, 1978; Moore, 1984; Schenck <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vrijenhoek,1986).IT'S HARD TO FIND A JOB ASA UNISEXUAL VERTEBRATEEcological weeds.- The <str<strong>on</strong>g>ecological</str<strong>on</strong>g> problems faced by unisexualvertebrates have received c<strong>on</strong>siderable attenti<strong>on</strong>. Pseudogamousunisexuals suffer <strong>the</strong> most severe c<strong>on</strong>straint, because<strong>the</strong>se sperm parasites cannot escape from, or outcompete,<strong>the</strong>ir sexual hosts. True par<strong>the</strong>nogens, however, are free toplay <strong>the</strong> role of fugitive species, relying <strong>on</strong> superior col<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong>ability <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a potential for rapid increase attributable toall-female reproducti<strong>on</strong>. Par<strong>the</strong>no<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g> forms of Cnemidophorusmay be <strong>the</strong> zoological equivalents of "weedy species"(Wright <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lowe, 1968), having a high intrinsic rate of increase<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> excepti<strong>on</strong>al col<strong>on</strong>izing abilities (Maslin, 1971). Theweeds hypo<strong>the</strong>sis assumes par<strong>the</strong>nogens are inferior competitorswithin <strong>the</strong> natural habitats of <strong>the</strong> parental species (Moore,1984). The successful establishment of weedy par<strong>the</strong>no<str<strong>on</strong>g>ge<strong>net</strong>ic</str<strong>on</strong>g>forms depends up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability of disturbed (disclimax) ormarginal habitats in which <strong>the</strong> parental forms are inferiorcompetitors (Cuellar, 1977a). Because of worldwide habitat destructi<strong>on</strong>due to human activities, Suomalainen et al. (1987, p.199) jestingly suggested <strong>the</strong> future may not be so hopeless forpar<strong>the</strong>nogens that "thrive in disturbed habitats <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>. . . toleratepolluti<strong>on</strong> better than bisexuals?'Hybridizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> an intermediate niche.- A variant of <strong>the</strong>weeds hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is <strong>the</strong> intermediate niche hypo<strong>the</strong>sis (Moore,1984). Because hybrids tend to be intermediate in morphology<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> presumably o<strong>the</strong>r characteristics that would c<strong>on</strong>strain<strong>the</strong>ir ability to use food <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> spatial resources, unisexual hybridsmight be best suited for ecot<strong>on</strong>al regi<strong>on</strong>s or intermediateniches in which <strong>the</strong> parental species are inferior competitors.This hypo<strong>the</strong>sis assumes <strong>the</strong> parental species are eachadapted to different regi<strong>on</strong>s al<strong>on</strong>g an <str<strong>on</strong>g>ecological</str<strong>on</strong>g> gradient. Althoughhybrid intermediacy may play a role in c<strong>on</strong>straining<strong>the</strong> broad-scale geographical distributi<strong>on</strong> of some unisexualhybrids (Moore, 1984), factors affecting <strong>the</strong> local distributi<strong>on</strong>26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!