13.07.2015 Views

Axillary sentinel lymph node cytopathology in Norwich - ESQA

Axillary sentinel lymph node cytopathology in Norwich - ESQA

Axillary sentinel lymph node cytopathology in Norwich - ESQA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pathological assessment of the<strong>sent<strong>in</strong>el</strong> <strong>lymph</strong> <strong>node</strong>Immediate – <strong>in</strong>tra-operative• Frozen section histopathology• CytopathologyDelayed• Conventional histopathology


Impr<strong>in</strong>t cytology of axillary SLN- Positive


Impr<strong>in</strong>t cytology of axillary SLN- Positive


Impr<strong>in</strong>t cytology of axillary SLN- Artefacts


1. Research studySLN identified by subdermal <strong>in</strong>jection of• Patent blue V dye– 119 patients (85.6%)• Patent blue V dye + radioisotope– 20 patients (14.4%)


1. Research study• Mastectomy: 51 (38%)• Breast-conserv<strong>in</strong>g surgery: 82 (62%)• <strong>Axillary</strong> <strong>node</strong>s removed:– Mean 11.3 (range 5 – 27; median 11)– Metastatic disease 53 patients (40%)• SLNs identified– Mean 1.11 (range 1 – 3)


1. Research study• Slides sta<strong>in</strong>ed with– Rapid Romanowski method (DiffQuik)– Standard May-Grünwald-Giemsa– MNF 116 anti-cytokerat<strong>in</strong>s antibody• Classified as– Def<strong>in</strong>itely positive for metastatic cancer– Def<strong>in</strong>itely negative for metastatic cancer– Indeterm<strong>in</strong>ate


1. Research study• Air-dried slides reported at– UCL (Dr Kocjan)– NNUH (RYB)• Comparison between centreswith histopathological f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs• Intra-operative assessment (RYB)– F<strong>in</strong>al 26 patients– Feasibility of technique as tool <strong>in</strong> management• Did not alter management <strong>in</strong> these patients


1. Research studySLN histology versus Paraff<strong>in</strong>-wax sectionscytology report<strong>in</strong>g Positive NegativeImpr<strong>in</strong>tcytologyPositive 36 3*Negative 6 86*Confirmed by immunocytochemical sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g.Suggests micrometastasis lost dur<strong>in</strong>g trimm<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> ofparaff<strong>in</strong>-wax block


1. Research studyTumour +veaxillaTumour -veaxillaImpr<strong>in</strong>t Positive 37 2cytology ofSLN Negative 16* 76•10/131 (7.6%) “skip” lesions – likely to be less now (


1. Research studyIntra-operative SLN assessment• 26 patients– Node-positive: 7– Node-negative: 19• 24 (92.3%) <strong>in</strong>tra-operative diagnoses correct– False negative cytology = 1 (3.8%)– Indeterm<strong>in</strong>ate cytology = 1 (3.8%)– False positive cytology = 0


1. Research studyIntra-operative SLN assessment• Mean time to report = 24.5 m<strong>in</strong>– Slides leav<strong>in</strong>g theatre → report received


1. Research studyIf these observations had driven decision onaxillary dissection:• 6 (23.1%) immediate axillary dissections• 19 (73.1%) spared extensive axillary surgery– Indeterm<strong>in</strong>ate regarded as negative• 1 patient (3.8%) → second operation todissect axilla


1. Research studySens itySpec ityPPVNPV%%%%CytologyRout<strong>in</strong>e(131 cases)Operative(25 cases)Node Axilla Node Axilla Node Axilla Node Axilla86 70 97 97 92 95 93 8386 86 100 100 100 100 95 95Indeterm<strong>in</strong>ate cases excluded from analysis


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative use• Intra-operative SLN cytology now part ofcl<strong>in</strong>ical practice– What we say matters!• Audit carried out by Seema Angra (SHO)– Value of cytokerat<strong>in</strong> ICC– Effectiveness of service– Diagnostic difficulties


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative use• 6 cytopathologists now <strong>in</strong>volved– Steep learn<strong>in</strong>g curve– Double-read<strong>in</strong>g when difficult• Slides sta<strong>in</strong>ed with– Rapid Romanowski method (DiffQuik)– MNF 116 anti-cytokerat<strong>in</strong>s antibody


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative useDiffQuikCK ICCSensitivity 41.3% 58.7%Specificity 100% 100%PPV 100% 100%NPV 84.9% 88.9%


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative use• ↓ sensitivity•Why?– Err<strong>in</strong>g on the side of caution• Avoid false positive reports– Technical difficulties• Slide preparation• Slide <strong>in</strong>terpretation


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative useOver to Anne Girl<strong>in</strong>gfor discussion ofhistopathological aspects


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative useCytopathology reportPositive DiffQuik sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 19 / 198 (9.6%)Positive CK ICC sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 27 / 191 (14.1%)Histopathology reportPositive SLN 46 /198 (23.2%)Positive cases reportedas negative at operation27 / 198 (13.6%)


2. Recent <strong>in</strong>tra-operative use• We have abandoned rout<strong>in</strong>e CK ICC <strong>in</strong>these cases– No value <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tra-operative context• Should we undertake– Intra-operative ultrarapid CK ICC method?– Frozen sections?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!