bundle block adjustment with 3d natural cubic splines
bundle block adjustment with 3d natural cubic splines bundle block adjustment with 3d natural cubic splines
The optimal unbiased estimate of the variance component can be obtained aŝσ 2 o = ẽT P ẽn − mẽ = y − A ̂ξ(4.4)where n is the number of equations and m is the number of parameters.If one or more of the three estimated parameter sets ξEOP k , ξSP i , ξt i are consideredas stochastic constraints, the reduction of the normal equation matrix can be applied.Control information is implemented as stochastic constraints in bundle blockadjustment. Distribution and quality of control features depend on the number andthe density of control features, the number of tie features and the degree of the overlapof tie features. If adding stochastic constraints removes the rank deficiency of theGauss-Markov model, bundle adjustment can be implemented employing only the extendedcollinearity equations for 3D natural cubic splines. Fixed exterior orientationparameters, control splines or control spline location parameters can be stochasticconstraints. In addition, splines in the object space can be divided into control featuresand tie features so that tie spline parameters can be recovered by bundle blockadjustment.Stochastic constraints assigned into ˆξ 2 , the integrated model can bewritten as62
[ ] [ ] [ ]N11 N 12 ˆξ1 c1N12T =N 22 ˆξ 2 c 2N 11 ˆξ1 + N 12 ˆξ2 = c 1N T 12 ˆξ 1 + N 22 ˆξ2 = c 2ˆξ 2 = N −122 c 2 − N −122 N T 12 ˆξ 2(N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12)ˆξ 1 = c 1 − N 12 N −122 c 2ˆξ 1 = (N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12) −1 (c 1 − N 12 N −122 c 2 )where the matrix of N, c, ξ depends on the stochastic constraints.D(ˆξ 1 ) = σ 2 oQ 11D(ˆξ 2 ) = σ 2 oQ 22D[ ] [ ] −1 [ ]ˆξ1= σ ˆξo2 N11 N 122 N12T = σoN 2 Q11 Q 1222 Q T 12 Q 22[ ] [ ] [N11 N 12 Q11 Q 12 I 0N12 T N 22 Q T =12 Q 22 0 I]N 11 Q 11 + N 12 Q T 12 = IN T 12Q 11 + N 22 Q T 12 = 0Q T 12 = −N −122 N T 12Q 11Q 12 = −Q 11 N 22 N −122(N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12)Q 11 = IQ 11 = (N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12) −163
- Page 23 and 24: Hessian. Interest point operators w
- Page 25 and 26: [60], Ebner and Ohlhof(1994) [16],
- Page 27 and 28: a complicated problem. The developm
- Page 29 and 30: ⎡⎢⎣x i − x py i − y p−f
- Page 31 and 32: x p = −f (X A + t · a − X C )r
- Page 33 and 34: surfaces and terrain models in 2D a
- Page 35 and 36: f(u) − e(u) = g(u)f(u) − e(u) =
- Page 37 and 38: Tankovich[69] used linear features
- Page 39 and 40: (a) 0th order continuity (b) 1st or
- Page 41 and 42: Cardinal splineA Cardinal spline is
- Page 43 and 44: 2.3.2 Fourier transformFourier seri
- Page 45 and 46: For other polyline expressions, Aya
- Page 47 and 48: Each segment of a natural cubic spl
- Page 49 and 50: ⎡⎢⎣2 11 4 11 4 1· · ·1 4 1
- Page 51 and 52: 3.2 Extended collinearity equation
- Page 53 and 54: R −1 = R T . The matrix R T (= R
- Page 55 and 56: dx p = M 1 dX C + M 2 dY C + M 3 dZ
- Page 57 and 58: In this research, the arc-length pa
- Page 59 and 60: =√∫ √√√ ()ti+1−f u′ (
- Page 61 and 62: This equation can be replaced with
- Page 63 and 64: order polynomial using Newton’s d
- Page 65 and 66: y collinearity equations, tangents
- Page 67 and 68: d tan(θ t ) = w′ (v ′ w − w
- Page 69 and 70: y each two points, which are four e
- Page 71 and 72: +M 14 db i3 + M 15 dc i0 + M 16 dc
- Page 73: collinearity model are described in
- Page 77 and 78: systematic errors in the image spac
- Page 79 and 80: interval based on the normal distri
- Page 81 and 82: 1 ∂Φ2 ∂l= (X C + d 1 l − a i
- Page 83 and 84: about splines, their relationships,
- Page 85 and 86: cubic spline in the image and the o
- Page 87 and 88: The redundancy budget of a tie poin
- Page 89 and 90: of bundle block adjustment is requi
- Page 91 and 92: ξ kiSP = [ da i0 da i1 da i2 da i3
- Page 93 and 94: Spline location parametersImage 1 I
- Page 95 and 96: Spline location parametersImage 1 I
- Page 97 and 98: 5.3 Recovery of EOPs and spline par
- Page 99 and 100: Table 5.7 expressed the convergence
- Page 101 and 102: Iteration with an incorrect spline
- Page 103 and 104: Vertical aerial photographData 9 Ju
- Page 105 and 106: All locations are assumed as on the
- Page 107 and 108: of the Gauss-Markov model correspon
- Page 109 and 110: estimation is obstacled by the corr
- Page 111 and 112: Interior orientation defines a tran
- Page 113 and 114: + fu ( w2 31 (X i (t) − X C ) + s
- Page 115 and 116: A.2 Derivation of arc-length parame
- Page 117 and 118: +2f( t [1 + t 2) − 1 22s 12 (Y i
- Page 119 and 120: +Du ′ ( t 1 + t 22)2r 11 t + Dv
- Page 121 and 122: A 17 = t [2 − t 1 16 2 f(t 1) −
- Page 123 and 124: 1−u ′ w − w ′ u {w′ [s 21
[ ] [ ] [ ]N11 N 12 ˆξ1 c1N12T =N 22 ˆξ 2 c 2N 11 ˆξ1 + N 12 ˆξ2 = c 1N T 12 ˆξ 1 + N 22 ˆξ2 = c 2ˆξ 2 = N −122 c 2 − N −122 N T 12 ˆξ 2(N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12)ˆξ 1 = c 1 − N 12 N −122 c 2ˆξ 1 = (N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12) −1 (c 1 − N 12 N −122 c 2 )where the matrix of N, c, ξ depends on the stochastic constraints.D(ˆξ 1 ) = σ 2 oQ 11D(ˆξ 2 ) = σ 2 oQ 22D[ ] [ ] −1 [ ]ˆξ1= σ ˆξo2 N11 N 122 N12T = σoN 2 Q11 Q 1222 Q T 12 Q 22[ ] [ ] [N11 N 12 Q11 Q 12 I 0N12 T N 22 Q T =12 Q 22 0 I]N 11 Q 11 + N 12 Q T 12 = IN T 12Q 11 + N 22 Q T 12 = 0Q T 12 = −N −122 N T 12Q 11Q 12 = −Q 11 N 22 N −122(N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12)Q 11 = IQ 11 = (N 11 − N 12 N −122 N T 12) −163