13.07.2015 Views

An Engine System Approach to Exhaust Waste Heat Recovery - EERE

An Engine System Approach to Exhaust Waste Heat Recovery - EERE

An Engine System Approach to Exhaust Waste Heat Recovery - EERE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DisclaimerThe work described in this presentation, conducted under the Caterpillar / DOE cooperativeresearch agreement, was conducted by the Technology and Solutions Division (T&SD) ofCaterpillar Inc. The cooperative research described in the presentation was done <strong>to</strong> evaluate proofof-conceptfor technologies that meet EPA 2010 on-highway emissions with the potential <strong>to</strong> improvepeak brake thermal efficiency by 10%. Cursory consideration was given <strong>to</strong> which technologies mayhave some ability <strong>to</strong> be commercialized by the engine divisions of Caterpillar which havecommercialization responsibility.The process <strong>to</strong> validate technologies as commercially viable was not in the scope of the program,nor was it undertaken. Commercialization aspects such as cost/benefit analysis, reliability,durability, serviceability and packaging across multiple applications were only considered at acursory level. Until such analysis is completed,any attempt <strong>to</strong> imply commercial viability as a resul<strong>to</strong>f the material in this presentation is not justified.Copyright: ©2010 Caterpillar Inc. All Rights ReservedTrademark: CAT, CATERPILLAR, their respective logos, “Caterpillar Yellow” and the “Power Edge” trade dress, aswell as corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used withoutpermission.Caterpillar Non-Confidential


AGENDA• EWHR Program Objectives, Timeline, Scope• Technical Developments• Summary and ConclusionsCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Program ObjectiveDevelop components, technologies, and methods <strong>to</strong>recover energy lost in the exhaust processes of aninternal combustion engine and utilize that energy <strong>to</strong>improve engine thermal efficiency by 10% (i.e. from ~42% <strong>to</strong> ~46% thermal efficiency) No increase in emissions rate No reduction in power density Compatible with anticipated aftertreatmentCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Program TimelineProgram Phases Per ContractEND OFPROGRAMDefineRoadmapPhase 120052006ValidateroadmapPhase 220072008Mid-Program<strong>System</strong> DemoPhase 320092010Continue developmen<strong>to</strong>f promisingtechnologies Originally planned as a 5 Phase Program Truncated <strong>to</strong> 3 Phases – migration <strong>to</strong> Supertruck Final program report Technologies developed Key results & lessons learnedCaterpillar Non-Confidential


<strong>An</strong> integrated system solution<strong>to</strong> waste heat recoveryA/C<strong>Engine</strong> C15<strong>Approach</strong>BrakePowerPort Insul.(0.5%)Numbers in ( ) indicate % increase inthermal efficiency from this componentPiping(0.5%)Intercooling(1.3%)HP Turbine(2.0%)HP CompI/CHP TurbStackStrategy OptimizationLP CompLP TurbAmbientCGIHECoolerDPFCGIBaseline C1515.2L On-Highway Truck <strong>Engine</strong>LPL (low pressure loop) configurationStack <strong>Recovery</strong>*(4.0%)Compressors(0.7%)LP Turbine(1.0%)•Turbocompound or bot<strong>to</strong>ming cycle: supplementsengine power via electrical or mechanicalconnection <strong>to</strong> flywheelCaterpillar Non-Confidential


• “<strong>System</strong>” SolutionProgram Philosophy– Modular; “Best” elements can be carried <strong>to</strong> production• Production-Viable Technologies– Cost, Packaging, Manufacturing• Broad Emissions Architecture Applicability– Viable for HPL, LPL, or non-EGR solutions– Compatible w/ AftertreatmentCaterpillar Non-Confidential


AGENDA• EWHR Program Objectives, Timeline, Scope• Technical Developments• Summary and ConclusionsCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – HP Turbine +2%Target: + 2% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency:• + 8% Turbine Stage Efficiency• Improved <strong>Exhaust</strong> Pulse UtilizationRND Gen1 vs Baseline Radial HPHP Turbine Efficiency TargetTurbine-Mech Eff, T-S, (%)0.840.820.80.780.760.740.720.70.682%Bslntarget0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8Velocity Ratio, U/CPeak efficiency shiftrequired for +2% enginethermal efficiencyTechnologies• RND turbine• Mixed Flow turbineCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – HP Turbine +2%Technology 1 – Radial, Nozzled, Divided (RND) Turbine• High efficiency turbine wheel• Nozzled and divided turbine housingGas Stand Test Results0.85000.8000Turbine Aero efficiency (T-S)0.75000.70000.65000.60000.55000.50000.45000.40005%Imperial College Test DataRND TurbineBase Turbine0.4000 0.5000 0.6000 0.7000 0.8000 0.9000 1.0000 1.1000Velocity ratio, U/C+• + 5-6% turbine efficiency• Full map width benefitsCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – HP Turbine +2%Technology 1 – Radial, Nozzled, Divided (RND) Turbine• High efficiency turbine wheel• Nozzled and divided turbine housingOn-<strong>Engine</strong> Test Results: Single-stage turbo HPL EGR engineBSFC BSFC - % ∆ - Improvement RND vs Base Radial with RND TurbineTurbine3000.0Response Testing3.5+402500.02000.0<strong>Engine</strong> LoadLOAD1500.01000.0500.03.01.72.22.21.31.01.61.10.40.0900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100SPEED<strong>Engine</strong> Speed2.5TIME (sec)Response Time33521.510.530% improvement in response00800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000<strong>Engine</strong> SpeedENGINE SPEED (rpm)BslnRND30252015105Peak Smoke Opacity, %SmokeCaterpillar Non-ConfidentialDurability testing underway• Successful completion of nozzle ring thermal cycle test


Technical Progress – HP Turbine +2%Technology 2 – Mixed Flow Turbine• Nozzle-less, divided volutefirst-passGas Stand Test Results0.8500radialmixed flowTurbine Aero efficiency (T-S)0.80000.75000.70000.65000.60000.55000.50000.45000.40005%Imperial College Test DataMixed Flow TurbineBase Turbine0.40000 0.50000 0.60000 0.70000 0.80000 0.90000 1.00000 1.10000Velocity ratio, U/C• + 2-3% turbine efficiency• Efficiency peak at lowerU/C a improved exhaustpulse utilization• + 5-6% efficiency atlower U/CCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – HP Turbine +2%Technology 2 – Mixed Flow Turbine• Nozzle-less, divided volutefirst-passradialmixed flowOn-<strong>Engine</strong> Test Results: Series turbo LPL EGR engineBSFC BSFC - % ∆ Improvement - Mixed Flow vs with Radial Mixed HP Flow Turbine Turbine1800.01600.01400.01200.0<strong>Engine</strong> Load<strong>Engine</strong> LOADLoad1000.0800.0600.0400.0200.00.01.31.51.43.11.31.10.42.6-0.2-0.1-0.6900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100<strong>Engine</strong> SPEEDSpeed<strong>Engine</strong> Speed• 1 <strong>to</strong> 1.5% fuel economybenefit at low and mid speedrange where exhaust pulseenergy is significantDevelopment of mixed-flow,nozzled, divided turbine isunderwayCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – LP TurbineTarget: + 1% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency:• + 6% Turbine Stage Efficiency+1%Technology 1 – High Efficiency Axial Turbine• +6% turbine efficiency verified – analysis, test• Packaging concerns w/ series turbosTechnology 2 – High Efficiency, Nozzled, Radial Turbine• Minimal impact on response – design freedomGas Stand Test Results0.84Gas Stand Turbine EfficienciesTurbine-Mechanical Eff, T-STurb-Mech Eff, T-S0.820.80.780.760.740.720.7EWHR LP2%BSLN LP0.680.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9• + 4% peak turbine efficiencyCaterpillar Non-ConfidentialVelocity Ratio, U/CVelocity Ratio, U/C


Technical Progress – CompressorsTarget: + 0.7% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency:• + 2.5% Compressor Stage Efficiencies+0.7%HP Technology – Highly backswept wheel w/ vaned diffuserGas Stand Test Results2.82.62.42.2Pressure Ratio21.81.60.820.810.80.780.760.720.740.660.62• efficiency 1-1.5% > production• ½ of target achieved0.71.41.210.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4Caterpillar Non-ConfidentialFlow


Technical Progress – Stack <strong>Recovery</strong>+4%Target: + 4% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency• Stack recovery on baseline LPL engine• Turbocompound downselected• Bray<strong>to</strong>n Cycle investigated – packaging challenges<strong>Engine</strong> Simulation ResultsPeak Torque Conditions7.0%6.0%Technologies• Mechanical TurbocompoundBSFC Benefit5.0%4.0%3.0%2.0%1.0%0.0%85% Transmission Efficiency90% Transmission Efficiency95% Transmission Efficiency0 5 10 15 20 25 30Backpressure (kPa)• Electrical TurbocompoundCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Technical Progress – Stack <strong>Recovery</strong>Target: + 4% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency• Stack recovery on baseline LPL engineTechnology 1 – Mechanical Turbocompound+4%• Robust, high-efficiency bearing is challenge• Developed power turbine gas stand test method• Detailed shaft motion measurements• Test Conditions• 5 bearing systems• Speeds from 25-60krpm• Gas Stand Test Results• < 0.002” shaft motion• 80-84% aero efficiency0.0020.0010.0-0.001-0.00250krpmGas StandInstrumentationCaterpillar Non-ConfidentialShaft Motion Results


Technical Progress – Stack <strong>Recovery</strong>Target: + 4% <strong>Engine</strong> Thermal Efficiency• Stack recovery on baseline LPL engineTechnology 2 – Electrical Turbocompound• Two concept designs developed / analyzed• Concept 1: Genera<strong>to</strong>r in front of compressor• Ro<strong>to</strong>rdynamic / packaging challenges• Concept 2: Genera<strong>to</strong>r between wheelsCaterpillar Non-Confidential0.002• Thermal management challenges• Concept 2 analysis results 0.001• Genera<strong>to</strong>r efficiencies > 96%0.0• Peak ro<strong>to</strong>r stress acceptable• Peak sta<strong>to</strong>r temperature acceptable-0.001• Peak magnet temperature acceptable• Bending critical speed acceptable-0.00250krpmDevelopment Ongoing: TSB-Funded ProgramGas StandRe(x)Shaft Radius, inches< >43210-1-2-3-4Shaft11Mo<strong>to</strong>r / Genera<strong>to</strong>r5 10 153rd Critical Speed (87 krpm)20 25+4%CompressorInstrumentation3035 400 2 4 6 8 10 12Axial Location, inches45Shaft147Turbine


Summary-0.4%• Effect of lowercomponentefficienciesStack <strong>Recovery</strong>(4.0%)Port Insul.(0.5%)PipingIntercooling(0.5%)(1.3%)Strategy OptimizationHigh Eff.HP Turbine(2.0%)-0.7%• Used RND turbine• Mixed Flow ND will improve-0.5%• HP compressor ~ ½ ofgoal achieved• No change yet <strong>to</strong> LP compressor* Turbocompound or Bot<strong>to</strong>ming CycleCompressors(0.7%)“Mid-Program” Proof-of-Concept Demo*High Eff.LP Turbine(1.0%)Thermal Eff.ImprovementDesign point demo - target: +9.0%Design point demo - achieved: +7.0%*Not commercially validated-0.4%• Used radial turbine map(better packaging vs axial)“Virtual” Demo:<strong>Engine</strong> Simulationusing measuredcomponentperformance mapsCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Port Insul.(0.5%)Piping(0.5%)SummaryIntercooling(1.3%)Stack <strong>Recovery</strong>(4.0%)Strategy OptimizationHigh Eff.HP Turbine(2.0%)Without theseelements, value ofturbocompound isjust 2%* Turbocompound or Bot<strong>to</strong>ming CycleCompressors(0.7%)High Eff.LP Turbine(1.0%)“Mid-Program” Proof-of-Concept Demo*Thermal Eff.ImprovementDesign point demo - target: +9.0%Design point demo - achieved: +7.0%“Virtual” Demo:<strong>Engine</strong> Simulationusing measuredcomponentperformance maps*Not commercially validatedCaterpillar Non-Confidential


Caterpillar Thanks:AcknowledgementsBarber-Nichols Inc.ConceptsNRECHoneywellImperial CollegeOak Ridge National LabTurbo SolutionsElectric turbocompound design consultingTurbomachinery design consulting & optimization.Turbomachinery design consulting,component procurement and integration.Gas stand testing of advancedturbomachinery componentsOn-engine testing of advancedturbomachinery componentsTurbomachinery design consulting &optimization.Caterpillar Non-Confidential


Caterpillar Thanks:Acknowledgements• Department of Energy• Gurpreet Singh• John Fairbanks• DOE National Energy Technology Labora<strong>to</strong>ry• Carl MarondeCaterpillar Non-Confidential

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!