13.07.2015 Views

MYFBS, MAY(R - the Digital Library of Georgia

MYFBS, MAY(R - the Digital Library of Georgia

MYFBS, MAY(R - the Digital Library of Georgia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 <strong>MAY</strong>OR'S ANNUAL REPORT.5. The small suit <strong>of</strong> Washington Hassett, in whichhe claims damages under $100.00 for an alleged injuryto a horse, is pending in <strong>the</strong> Superior Court onappeal.6. The suit hrought by <strong>the</strong> executrix <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong>Schley to obtain an injunction against <strong>the</strong> city toprevent its taxing property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> estate east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>tracks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S., F. & W. Railway, was heard and adecision rendered in favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city totax, which decision was not appealed from, and thislitigation has thus been settled in favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city.7. The Rourke, Mitchell & Delaney suit is stillpending in <strong>the</strong> City Court.8. The Warren-Scharf Asphalt Paving Companysuit, brought in <strong>the</strong> United States Circuit Court, hasnot yet been heard in that court.9. The litigation with Mrs. Kassel, involving herright to recover two fines <strong>of</strong> $100.00 each, is now pendingin <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State.10. The suit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city against Floyd & Company,et al., has not yet been determined.11. The case pending at <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> my last reportinvolving <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city to tax property commonlyknown as ground rent lots, has been, since <strong>the</strong>report, finally adjudicated in favor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city by <strong>the</strong>Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States, <strong>the</strong> unanimousdecision <strong>of</strong> which has fully sustained <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> city and <strong>the</strong> judgments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Courts.Since <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> my last report <strong>the</strong> following newcases have been brought against <strong>the</strong> city :1. That <strong>of</strong> Miss Mary E. O'Brien, claiming damagesfor personal injuries sustained on account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!