13.07.2015 Views

A Gaze through the Veil:

A Gaze through the Veil:

A Gaze through the Veil:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> Shah and it was also seen as a Western import which was attempting to corruptyoung Iranians minds. In <strong>the</strong> years prior to <strong>the</strong> revolution, an assault was taken oncinema. One hundred and eighty cinemas were set alight, 400 spectators were killedby fire in a cinema where <strong>the</strong> doors had been locked from <strong>the</strong> outside. After <strong>the</strong>seattacks many film directors thought that film in Iran had reached its end. But as <strong>the</strong>government saw <strong>the</strong> potential for its use in propaganda, many films began to beproduced by government controlled institutes. Although <strong>the</strong> censorship policy was atits strictest just after <strong>the</strong> revolution and many film directors had been put underscrutiny or banned, <strong>the</strong> film industry still continued.The film director Abhas Kiarostami who has been critically acclaimed in <strong>the</strong> Westand has been described by critics as representing <strong>the</strong> highest level of artistry in cinemais not as highly acclaimed in Iran. His films have not been shown in <strong>the</strong> country forover ten years, as <strong>the</strong>y address taboo issues such as prostitution, suicide and divorce.To have films banned for addressing such <strong>the</strong>mes is difficult to comprehend from aWesterners point of view, as <strong>the</strong>se issues arise not only in cinema but in dailytelevision in most countries. By applying such strict censorship, one has to feel that<strong>the</strong> Iranian government are shielding <strong>the</strong>re people from issues that arise in everydaylife, although <strong>the</strong>y do not comply to Islamic values <strong>the</strong>y are still very much present in<strong>the</strong> modern world and I feel to taboo <strong>the</strong>se issues is to ignore issues that are prominentin everyday society.Ano<strong>the</strong>r director Mohsen Makhmalbaf films have endured a similar fate. One of hisfilms was banned as it portrayed adultery without condemnation. A leader from <strong>the</strong>Council of Guardians declared “In <strong>the</strong> name of art, a creeping movement has beenstarted which is a serious threat to <strong>the</strong> Islamic Republic, to <strong>the</strong> committed artists, andto <strong>the</strong> revolution.”(Callamard, 2006, p.19) The government released a guideline ofrules which states what can be shown in film, <strong>the</strong>se guidelines are continuouslychanging and many directors have chosen not to comply with <strong>the</strong>se rules. Most of <strong>the</strong>artists that reject <strong>the</strong>se rules are internationally renown and do not rely on <strong>the</strong> Iraniangovernment for financial support, <strong>the</strong>y also do not want to have to censor <strong>the</strong>recreativity. Jajar Panahi is one of <strong>the</strong>se artists and has every one of his films banned inIran, but he justifies this by stating that,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!