A Gaze through the Veil:
A Gaze through the Veil:
A Gaze through the Veil:
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>the</strong> Shah and it was also seen as a Western import which was attempting to corruptyoung Iranians minds. In <strong>the</strong> years prior to <strong>the</strong> revolution, an assault was taken oncinema. One hundred and eighty cinemas were set alight, 400 spectators were killedby fire in a cinema where <strong>the</strong> doors had been locked from <strong>the</strong> outside. After <strong>the</strong>seattacks many film directors thought that film in Iran had reached its end. But as <strong>the</strong>government saw <strong>the</strong> potential for its use in propaganda, many films began to beproduced by government controlled institutes. Although <strong>the</strong> censorship policy was atits strictest just after <strong>the</strong> revolution and many film directors had been put underscrutiny or banned, <strong>the</strong> film industry still continued.The film director Abhas Kiarostami who has been critically acclaimed in <strong>the</strong> Westand has been described by critics as representing <strong>the</strong> highest level of artistry in cinemais not as highly acclaimed in Iran. His films have not been shown in <strong>the</strong> country forover ten years, as <strong>the</strong>y address taboo issues such as prostitution, suicide and divorce.To have films banned for addressing such <strong>the</strong>mes is difficult to comprehend from aWesterners point of view, as <strong>the</strong>se issues arise not only in cinema but in dailytelevision in most countries. By applying such strict censorship, one has to feel that<strong>the</strong> Iranian government are shielding <strong>the</strong>re people from issues that arise in everydaylife, although <strong>the</strong>y do not comply to Islamic values <strong>the</strong>y are still very much present in<strong>the</strong> modern world and I feel to taboo <strong>the</strong>se issues is to ignore issues that are prominentin everyday society.Ano<strong>the</strong>r director Mohsen Makhmalbaf films have endured a similar fate. One of hisfilms was banned as it portrayed adultery without condemnation. A leader from <strong>the</strong>Council of Guardians declared “In <strong>the</strong> name of art, a creeping movement has beenstarted which is a serious threat to <strong>the</strong> Islamic Republic, to <strong>the</strong> committed artists, andto <strong>the</strong> revolution.”(Callamard, 2006, p.19) The government released a guideline ofrules which states what can be shown in film, <strong>the</strong>se guidelines are continuouslychanging and many directors have chosen not to comply with <strong>the</strong>se rules. Most of <strong>the</strong>artists that reject <strong>the</strong>se rules are internationally renown and do not rely on <strong>the</strong> Iraniangovernment for financial support, <strong>the</strong>y also do not want to have to censor <strong>the</strong>recreativity. Jajar Panahi is one of <strong>the</strong>se artists and has every one of his films banned inIran, but he justifies this by stating that,