Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...
Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ... Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...
Peril and Possibility 3 0 3and during social activities; others maintain strict gender segregation. Muslimparents and children, of all ethnic backgrounds, actively debate whether Muslimchildren should attend separate schools. Many parents worry about dating,drugs, and the consumerist culture in U.S. public schools. Others worry thatsending their kids to Islamic schools will make it more challenging for them tointeract with non-Muslims and to develop a successful career. Some Muslimstudents also argue that their presence as a Muslim witness is important in U.S.public schools.As important as mosques and schools are, however, they are not the onlypublic sites where Muslims interact with one another. In fact, many scholarsbelieve that as few as 10 percent of U.S. Muslims attend Friday prayers or Sundayschool on a regular basis. In the 1990s, the Internet has emerged as a sitewhere Muslims also meet, chat, and debate what it means to be a Muslim. “CyberIslam” can be fruitfully analyzed as its own kind of religious expression, inwhich Muslims on the privileged side of the digital divide can issue their ownlegal interpretations of Islam and challenge the authority of centuries-old traditionsof f i q h (Islamic jurisprudence). Like other Muslims around the world,some U.S. Muslims have bypassed the s h a r i ’ a and looked directly to the Qur’anand h a d i t h in order to craft their approach to the Islamic life. One need not bean a l i m (a traditionally trained Muslim religious scholar) or hold a prestigiousposition at an Islamic university to publish one’s opinions; one only needs accessto the World Wide Web. The Internet has also become a place whereyoung Muslims, like other single people in the United States, look for potentialmates. And it provides space for online Muslim support groups, like Al-Fatiha, an organization created by and for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgenderedMuslims.On the Internet, in national conferences, in mosques and schools, and ineach other’s homes, Muslims meet to discuss the critical questions of Muslimlife in the United States. Of all the questions debated, however, none is morehotly contested than the issue of gender and Islam, a subject of great interestto non-Muslim Americans, as well. In fact, the intra-Muslim debate about genderis shaped partly by the assumption among many non-Muslim Americansthat “traditional Islam” oppresses women. The ultimate symbol of that oppressionfor many is the practice of veiling, which is taken by some to be inherentlyd i s c r i m i n a t o ry. On television and in movies in the United States, one seldomgets to hear a veiled woman speak. Instead, one is treated to a silent image ofthe covered woman, and this image is often intended as evidence of oppression.Some feminists call this practice “double objectification.” That is, notonly do women in Islamic societies, as in most other societies, face gender prejudice,but they are also silenced by their representation in U.S. society. ManyAmericans have never actually met a woman who wears a veil or heard themspeak about why they wear such a garment.
3 0 4Islam i n World Cult u r e sH o w e v e r, very few U.S. Muslim women say that Islam is inherently oppressiveof women. To the contrary, many U.S. Muslim women see Islam as a liberatingforce. But they disagree over what it means to be a liberated Muslimwoman. For example, the popular South Asian American youth writer AsmaGull Hassan admits that there is much sexism in the Muslim world, but sheblames what she identifies as patriarchal culture rather Islamic religion for thisphenomenon. Hassan, who advocates the waging of “gender jihad,” praisesthe United States as a world full of social, economic, and political opportunityfor Muslim women. She also believes that the United States provides Muslims achance to return to the pure Islam of the Qur’an, which she sees as democratic,capitalist, and feminist. She does not normally wear a h i j a b (head scarf )and argues that it is modesty of the heart that matters most. In fact, she says,the promotion of the h i j a b is part of a conservative Muslim political agenda.According to her reading of the Qur’an, for both men and women, it is onlyn e c e s s a ry to cover oneself in modest clothing when praying.Qur’anic scholar Amina Wadud, an African American convert, also sees theQur’an as a liberating document. Like Hassan, she argues that many Muslimcommunities are patriarchal, and she reports that many Muslims have rejectedher scholarship as un-Islamic, Westernized, and feminist. Lest one think of theIslamic world as a sexist monolith, however, it is important to note thatWa d u d ’s most famous work, Qur’an and Wo m a n (1999) was first published inMalaysia, a Muslim country. Wadud argues that the Qur’an depicts men andwomen as equal, different, and complementary, and she stresses that theQur’an does not prescribe set gender roles for either. There is no gender hierarchyin the Qur’an, she argues, and women need not always be homemakers,mothers, and wives.Other U.S. Muslim women, however, embrace the notion of differing socialroles and find Islam liberating precisely because, according to them, it valuestheir roles as wives and mothers. In addition, some women also support thenotion of polygyny, and there are a few instances of extralegal polygamousmarriages, especially among African American Muslims. Some women involvedin such relationships have reported that they enjoy the sense of extendedkinship and community that these arrangements engender; they saytheir co-wives are like sisters. Others complain that their husbands do not treatall their wives equally, as commanded in the Qur’an. It should be stressed thatpolygyny is rare, perhaps extremely rare, and that the overwhelming majorityof married Muslims are monogamous.Although discussions about “exotica” like the veil and polygamy threaten tomonopolize non-Muslim public discourse on gender and Islam, U.S. Muslimwomen themselves are concerned about a much broader array of issues. Forexample, Muslim women often debate the question of what their roles shouldbe as Muslim community leaders. For the most part, in U.S. mosques, women
- Page 264: Chapter NineRace, Ideology, and Isl
- Page 267 and 268: A mosque in Bo-Kaap, the traditiona
- Page 269 and 270: 2 5 8Islam i n World Cult u r e sSo
- Page 271 and 272: 2 6 0Islam i n World Cult u r e sra
- Page 273 and 274: 2 6 2Islam i n World Cult u r e sBe
- Page 275 and 276: 2 6 4Islam i n World Cult u r e she
- Page 277 and 278: 2 6 6Islam i n World Cult u r e sla
- Page 279 and 280: 2 6 8Islam i n World Cult u r e scr
- Page 281 and 282: 2 7 0Islam i n World Cult u r e sof
- Page 283 and 284: 2 7 2Islam i n World Cult u r e sto
- Page 285 and 286: 2 7 4Islam i n World Cult u r e sTh
- Page 287 and 288: 2 7 6Islam i n World Cult u r e sca
- Page 289 and 290: 2 7 8Islam i n World Cult u r e sA
- Page 291 and 292: 2 8 0Islam i n World Cult u r e sab
- Page 293 and 294: 2 8 2Islam i n World Cult u r e s
- Page 295 and 296: 2 8 4Islam i n World Cult u r e sTh
- Page 297 and 298: 2 8 6Islam i n World Cult u r e sde
- Page 299 and 300: 2 8 8Islam i n World Cult u r e sfr
- Page 301 and 302: 2 9 0Islam i n World Cult u r e sSa
- Page 303 and 304: 2 9 2Islam i n World Cult u r e sWh
- Page 305 and 306: 2 9 4Islam i n World Cult u r e sst
- Page 307 and 308: 2 9 6Islam i n World Cult u r e smo
- Page 309 and 310: 2 9 8Islam i n World Cult u r e sof
- Page 311 and 312: 3 0 0Islam i n World Cult u r e swh
- Page 313: 3 0 2Islam i n World Cult u r e smo
- Page 317 and 318: 3 0 6Islam i n World Cult u r e sec
- Page 320 and 321: Chapter ElevenSuggestions for Furth
- Page 322 and 323: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 324 and 325: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 326 and 327: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 328 and 329: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 330 and 331: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 332 and 333: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 334 and 335: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 336 and 337: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 338 and 339: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 340 and 341: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 342 and 343: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 344 and 345: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 346 and 347: Suggestions for Further Reading and
- Page 348 and 349: Chapter TwelveKey TermsThe heading
- Page 350 and 351: Key Te r m s 3 3 9rule in South Afr
- Page 352 and 353: Key Te r m s 3 4 1Constitution of M
- Page 354 and 355: Key Te r m s 3 4 3Gey Sinan (8)The
- Page 356 and 357: Key Te r m s 3 4 5Brothers), an org
- Page 358 and 359: Key Te r m s 3 4 7the constitution.
- Page 360 and 361: Key Te r m s 3 4 9Kulub (8)A politi
- Page 362 and 363: Key Te r m s 3 5 1and historically
Peril and Possibility 3 0 3and dur<strong>in</strong>g social activities; others ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> strict gender segregation. Muslimparents and children, of all ethnic backgrounds, actively debate whether Muslimchildren should attend separate schools. Many parents worry about dat<strong>in</strong>g,drugs, and the consumerist culture <strong>in</strong> U.S. public schools. Others worry thatsend<strong>in</strong>g their kids to <strong>Islam</strong>ic schools will make it more challeng<strong>in</strong>g for them to<strong>in</strong>teract with non-Muslims and to develop a successful career. Some Muslimstudents also argue that their presence as a Muslim witness is important <strong>in</strong> U.S.public schools.As important as mosques and schools are, however, they are not the onlypublic sites where Muslims <strong>in</strong>teract with one another. In fact, many scholarsbelieve that as few as 10 percent of U.S. Muslims attend Friday prayers or Sundayschool on a regular basis. In the 1990s, the Internet has emerged as a sitewhere Muslims also meet, chat, and debate what it means to be a Muslim. “Cyber<strong>Islam</strong>” can be fruitfully analyzed as its own k<strong>in</strong>d of religious expression, <strong>in</strong>which Muslims on the privileged side of the digital divide can issue their ownlegal <strong>in</strong>terpretations of <strong>Islam</strong> and challenge the authority of centuries-old traditionsof f i q h (<strong>Islam</strong>ic jurisprudence). Like other Muslims around the world,some U.S. Muslims have bypassed the s h a r i ’ a and looked directly to the Qur’anand h a d i t h <strong>in</strong> order to craft their approach to the <strong>Islam</strong>ic life. One need not bean a l i m (a traditionally tra<strong>in</strong>ed Muslim religious scholar) or hold a prestigiousposition at an <strong>Islam</strong>ic university to publish one’s op<strong>in</strong>ions; one only needs accessto the <strong>World</strong> Wide Web. The Internet has also become a place whereyoung Muslims, like other s<strong>in</strong>gle people <strong>in</strong> the United States, look for potentialmates. And it provides space for onl<strong>in</strong>e Muslim support groups, like Al-Fatiha, an organization created by and for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgenderedMuslims.On the Internet, <strong>in</strong> national conferences, <strong>in</strong> mosques and schools, and <strong>in</strong>each other’s homes, Muslims meet to discuss the critical questions of Muslimlife <strong>in</strong> the United States. Of all the questions debated, however, none is morehotly contested than the issue of gender and <strong>Islam</strong>, a subject of great <strong>in</strong>terestto non-Muslim Americans, as well. In fact, the <strong>in</strong>tra-Muslim debate about genderis shaped partly by the assumption among many non-Muslim Americansthat “traditional <strong>Islam</strong>” oppresses women. The ultimate symbol of that oppressionfor many is the practice of veil<strong>in</strong>g, which is taken by some to be <strong>in</strong>herentlyd i s c r i m i n a t o ry. On television and <strong>in</strong> movies <strong>in</strong> the United States, one seldomgets to hear a veiled woman speak. Instead, one is treated to a silent image ofthe covered woman, and this image is often <strong>in</strong>tended as evidence of oppression.Some fem<strong>in</strong>ists call this practice “double objectification.” That is, notonly do women <strong>in</strong> <strong>Islam</strong>ic societies, as <strong>in</strong> most other societies, face gender prejudice,but they are also silenced by their representation <strong>in</strong> U.S. society. ManyAmericans have never actually met a woman who wears a veil or heard themspeak about why they wear such a garment.