Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...

Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ... Islam in World Cultures: Comparative Perspectives - Islamic Books ...

islamicblessings.com
from islamicblessings.com More from this publisher
13.07.2015 Views

Muslim Thought and Practice in Contemporary Indonesia 2 0 1and open discussion of issues connected with Islam and its role in Indonesians o c i e t y. Underlying nearly every aspect of his thought is a sense of dynamismand ever-evolving adaptability of ultimate Islamic ideals that is based upon anhistorically contextualized conceptualization of i j t i h a d . In this case, the technicallegal term “ i j t i h a d ” is best understood as meaning a generalized effort toapprehend the appropriate application of Islamic ideals to particular circumstances.In formulating vibrant and revitalized interpretations of Islam, supportersof Indonesia’s emerging neomodernist movement developed a deepand nuanced appreciation of past-historical traditions of Muslim scholarshipand the variety of methods used by u l a m a throughout history to answer thechallenges of change.More traditionally trained ulama in the period of the New Order tended tobelong to the NU. They also developed new models and adapted those of othersto suit their own vision and ideals. The NU is today the largest Muslim organizationin Indonesia and possibly even in the entire world. Although its appealto the p e s a n t re n tradition of Muslim scholarship has been a mainstay ofthe organization from its very inception, since the 1970s it has also developedin some very nontraditional ways. This change in character is due in part to its“modernized” organizational structure and in part to the influence of wellfundednongovernmental organizations, many of which have provided considerablefinancial support for projects involving the NU during the last decadesof Suharto’s New Order. It has thus opened itself up to allow some of its membersto experiment with ideas on the cutting edge of Muslim legal religiousand social thought in Indonesia.Throughout the struggle for independence and during the first twentyyears of the Republic, the NU was a loyal supporter of Soekarno, despite hisovertures to socialists and communists. This pattern of cooperation was considerablyaltered, however, with the fall of Soekarno and the rise of the NewO r d e r. Throughout the 1970s, relations between the political wing of the NUand the New Order government were visibly strained over such issues as marriagelaw. However, after a period of protracted and increasingly bitter struggle,the organization formally accepted the state’s 1984 “mandate of monoloyalty”to P a n c a s i l a as the official ideology of the Indonesian state. P a n c a s i l a i sa five-part state doctrine affirming ideals of social equality, opportunity, andjustice. Its first precept, “belief in one God,” had been objected to by somecommitted Muslims because of its Islamically neutral formulation.In the mid-1980s, members of NU cast its new stance toward the governmentas a “return” to the original design of the organization at the time of itsfounding in 1926. NU’s relationship to the New Order government grew increasinglyfriendly during the 1980s; a significant amount of new subsidieswere provided for p e s a n t re n education, especially during the 1990s. Some NUinstitutions, in turn, agreed to allow non-NU teachers to participate. Beyond

2 0 2Islam i n World Cult u r e sthis, there were also a number of more general compromises in which at leastsome of the more politically oriented figures within NU were willing to supportgovernment development programs, including those considered religiouslycontroversial, such as family planning. In general, a shift in organizationalorientation that accompanied the return was acknowledged in order toallow NU to redirect its energies, especially in the area of education, in moreproductive directions than those pursued in relation to the organization’s previouspolitical preoccupations.Although NU has long been considered to represent adherents to a moretraditionalist Islam, this characterization must be considerably qualified to describeits later configuration. The reorientation of the NU’s primary focusaway from party politics and toward religious and social activities also affordeda reascendancy of wider influence for the u l a m a , who had originally been theo r g a n i z a t i o n ’s core constituents. In addition, since NU’s acceptance of P a n-c a s i l a in 1984 as an ideological foundation, a spirit of open inquiry into religiousquestions grew within the younger ranks of the organization. The NUcontinues to emphasize the traditions of Muslim scholarship, especially the importanceof following the jurisprudence of one of the established Sunnischools of law, and it has also in the New Order years and after effected a powerful transformation of mainstream Islam in a secular state.These developments within the ranks of the NU involved a conscious reevaluationof the traditional corpus of Muslim scholarship with an eye to establishingits relevance to contemporary needs. The changes within the NU in theNew Order years coincided with a renewed interest in the canon of establishedMuslim scholarship by thinkers outside the organization. It may be that thesedevelopments within the NU were actually facilitated by the development of agrowing appreciation of the traditional corpus of Muslim scholarship by Indonesianneomodernists. Across a spectrum of Muslim thought in contempora ry Indonesia, many progressive thinkers had come to recognize the shortcomingsof “classical modernism” and were searching for ways to accessuniversally Islamic sources of depth, authenticity, and authority in their approachto Islam in order to solve real social and religious problems. In thoughtand practice, many Indonesian Muslims were reaffirming models of revelation,especially the Qur’an, the primary orientation for what Mark Woodward (1996)has termed a “new paradigm” of positive social change in the modern world.Scripturalist Reformism and the Call for IjtihadTo this day, the mainstay of Muslim education in NU circles remains the p e-s a n t re n tradition. Other Muslim organizations, as well as the Indonesian government,of course introduced some major structural, curricular, and institu-

Muslim Thought and Practice <strong>in</strong> Contemporary Indonesia 2 0 1and open discussion of issues connected with <strong>Islam</strong> and its role <strong>in</strong> Indonesians o c i e t y. Underly<strong>in</strong>g nearly every aspect of his thought is a sense of dynamismand ever-evolv<strong>in</strong>g adaptability of ultimate <strong>Islam</strong>ic ideals that is based upon anhistorically contextualized conceptualization of i j t i h a d . In this case, the technicallegal term “ i j t i h a d ” is best understood as mean<strong>in</strong>g a generalized effort toapprehend the appropriate application of <strong>Islam</strong>ic ideals to particular circumstances.In formulat<strong>in</strong>g vibrant and revitalized <strong>in</strong>terpretations of <strong>Islam</strong>, supportersof Indonesia’s emerg<strong>in</strong>g neomodernist movement developed a deepand nuanced appreciation of past-historical traditions of Muslim scholarshipand the variety of methods used by u l a m a throughout history to answer thechallenges of change.More traditionally tra<strong>in</strong>ed ulama <strong>in</strong> the period of the New Order tended tobelong to the NU. They also developed new models and adapted those of othersto suit their own vision and ideals. The NU is today the largest Muslim organization<strong>in</strong> Indonesia and possibly even <strong>in</strong> the entire world. Although its appealto the p e s a n t re n tradition of Muslim scholarship has been a ma<strong>in</strong>stay ofthe organization from its very <strong>in</strong>ception, s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1970s it has also developed<strong>in</strong> some very nontraditional ways. This change <strong>in</strong> character is due <strong>in</strong> part to its“modernized” organizational structure and <strong>in</strong> part to the <strong>in</strong>fluence of wellfundednongovernmental organizations, many of which have provided considerablef<strong>in</strong>ancial support for projects <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g the NU dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decadesof Suharto’s New Order. It has thus opened itself up to allow some of its membersto experiment with ideas on the cutt<strong>in</strong>g edge of Muslim legal religiousand social thought <strong>in</strong> Indonesia.Throughout the struggle for <strong>in</strong>dependence and dur<strong>in</strong>g the first twentyyears of the Republic, the NU was a loyal supporter of Soekarno, despite hisovertures to socialists and communists. This pattern of cooperation was considerablyaltered, however, with the fall of Soekarno and the rise of the NewO r d e r. Throughout the 1970s, relations between the political w<strong>in</strong>g of the NUand the New Order government were visibly stra<strong>in</strong>ed over such issues as marriagelaw. However, after a period of protracted and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly bitter struggle,the organization formally accepted the state’s 1984 “mandate of monoloyalty”to P a n c a s i l a as the official ideology of the Indonesian state. P a n c a s i l a i sa five-part state doctr<strong>in</strong>e affirm<strong>in</strong>g ideals of social equality, opportunity, andjustice. Its first precept, “belief <strong>in</strong> one God,” had been objected to by somecommitted Muslims because of its <strong>Islam</strong>ically neutral formulation.In the mid-1980s, members of NU cast its new stance toward the governmentas a “return” to the orig<strong>in</strong>al design of the organization at the time of itsfound<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1926. NU’s relationship to the New Order government grew <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyfriendly dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1980s; a significant amount of new subsidieswere provided for p e s a n t re n education, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. Some NU<strong>in</strong>stitutions, <strong>in</strong> turn, agreed to allow non-NU teachers to participate. Beyond

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!