evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

skupine modelov za spreminjanje okolja inurbanih predelov. Ta dva zemljevida sta bilaprekrita in sta skupaj tvorila nov zemljevid, ki jeprikazoval območja konfliktnih zahtev in njihovointenzivnost. Eno najbolj kritičnih območij jedragocen habitat ob vznožju Fort Huacuce,vojaškega oporišča, katerega je mogoče zapretiin je tudi izredno zaželena lokacija za razvoj.V obeh študijah je postalo očitno, da so bila taobmočja konflikta relativno majhna vendarizredno pomembna za ohranitev želenihznačilnosti krajine. V mnogih krajih, kjer soobsežne krajine zavarovane pred gradnjo,zaščitena območja niso zanimiva za neželenrazvoj. V teh primerih sta varstvo de facto inminimalno prizadevanje že zadostna. Te glavnetežnje po spremembah je treba obvladovati, dabi to dosegli, pa je treba prepoznati tiste, prikaterih so sedanji krajinski pogoji visoko cenjeniin je tudi pritisk po spreminjanju močan. Na tempodročju bi morali svoja prizadevanja usmeriti vzaščito de jure.Nenazadnje pa menim, da govorimo preveč o»zaščiti«. »Živih krajin« ne moremo »zaščititi«.Spreminjanje je lastnost vsake krajine. Kar lahkostorimo, je selektivno ohranjanje nekaterihvidikov krajine, s tem ko skušamo obvladovatispreminjanje. Namesto govorjenja o »zaščiti« bimorali preiti na dejanja ohranjanja in ponekodtudi oblikovanja krajin.study area. One of the most critical of these areasis the valuable habitat in the foothills of FortHuachuca, a military base that may be closedand which is also extremely desirable for development.In both of these studies it became apparent thatthe areas of conflict were relatively small, butextremely important if the desired landscapequalities were to be maintained. In many placeswhere large landscape areas are protected fromdevelopment, the protected areas are not attractiveto undesirable development. In these cases,de facto conservation and minimal action maybe adequate. It is the major forces of changethat must be managed, and to do so, we mustidentify those where current landscape conditionsare highly valued and the pressure forchange is high. It is here that we should focusour efforts towards de jure conservation.As a final word, I think that we talk too muchabout »preservation«. One cannot »preserve« livinglandscapes. Change is part of any landscape.We can selectively conserve aspects of landscapesas we try to manage change. We shouldreplace talking about »preservation« with actionstowards conservation and for some landscapes,design.91Delavnica 1 / Workshop 1ViriLiteraturePearcy, G. Etzel, A Thirty-Eight State U.S.A. Plycon Press 1973.http://projects.gsd.harvard.edu/lapaz/Steinitz, C., et al, Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: theUpper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonoma, Island Press, 2003Pearcy, G. Etzel A Thirty-Eight State U.S.A. Plycon Press 1973http://projects.gsd.harvard.edu/lapaz/Steinitz, C. et al Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: the UpperSan Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonoma, Island Press, 2003