evropska konvencija o krajini - Ministrstvo za infrastrukturo in prostor

vodi k zanimivim možnostim za disciplinarnoinovacijo. Vodi lahko do ustanovitve nove vizije»Krajinskega urbanizma«, ki na inovativen načinopredeljuje odnos med mestom, okoljem inkrajino (Turner, 1996; Waldheim, 2006).»Krajinski urbanizem« tako postane izraz zaposkus združitve ustrezne logike posameznestroke z združevanjem naravnih procesov inrazvoja mest v izgradnji nove »umetne ekologije«,ki dobro zastopa pomen urbanega okoljaznotraj današnje krajine.»Krajinski urbanizem« se razlaga kot nov pristop,ki skuša »vključiti procese in tehnologije, ki sozgodovinsko oblikovale krajino v domenourbanizma, kar povečuje njegovo zmožnostobvladovanja velikega obsega meril, različnihdomen in hitrih sprememb, ki jih mora trenutnoupoštevati pri svojem delovanju«. Vsi ti pogojipreizkušajo uveljavljene prakse načrtovanja,nalagajo rešitve, ki so vedno manj rigidne indoločene, v prid drugim, ki so bolj odprte zaobdelavo in bolj nedoločene, prav tako kot sedogaja pri spreminjanju naravnih krajin (Najle,2003).Novi okviri in metode delovanja se lahko rodijoiz stičišča med »okoljskim inženiringom inkrajinskimi študijami ter strategijami urbanega inindustrijskega razvoja«. Isti pojem oblike lahkorazložimo tudi kot »rezultat oblikovanja procesovin ne nekaj, kar je samo sebi namen« in izhaja izpostopka oblikovanja (Mertins, 2003).Preskušanje »krajinskega urbanizma« je v resniciše zelo redko in zdi se, da se inovativni potencialtega pristopa še ni uspel popolnoma izkazati.Primer izkušnje, ki je zelo zanimiva, jetekmovanje za Downsview Park v Torontu,predstavljen kot priložnost za ponovno odkritjeparka kot urbane krajine za lokalno družbo vrazvoju (Mertins, 2003; Blum, 2004). Pogledamolahko tudi druge projekte v Holandiji, šeposebej Leidsche Rijn, ki ga je načrtoval West 8,ali program »Uit de Klei getrokken«, nove krajinepolderjev, osnovanih na projektu Bureau Vista(Diekman, 1999).Na splošno lahko ugotovimo, da je nova vizija ševedno v zgodnji fazi razvoja in bo potrebno ševeliko dela, da se bo potrdila kot novatransdisciplinarna perspektiva, ki bo omogočilaupravljanje lokalnih ozemelj v popolniusklajenosti med urbanizmom in krajino.The joined approach of urbanism and the landscapecan be practiced as a juxtaposition betweentwo legitimate ways of looking at themanagement of transformations: one that isoriented, above all, at disciplining the developmentof settlement and land use, while the otheris aimed at caring for the permanence of themeanings and physical forms that characterisethe identity of a landscape. They are two approachesthat have roots in different disciplineand which have to deal with practices and policiesof intervention that are, to date, notably diverse.Their combination, focused on a specificlandscape, may be capable of guaranteeing thatthe recognisability of the respective disciplinarytraditions remains intact.However, it is precisely the consideration ofthese quality objectives as a common turningpoint, both for urbanism as well as for the landscape,which leads to interesting possibilities fordisciplinary innovation. In particular, it may leadto the creation of a new vision of LandscapeUrbanism that defines, in an innovative manner,the relationship between city, environment andlandscape (Turner, 1996; Waldheim, 2006).Landscape Urbanism thus becomes the expressionof the attempt to bring together the respectivelogic of each discipline, integrating naturalprocesses and urban development in the constructionof a new »artificial ecology« that wellrepresents the meaning of the urbanised environmentwithin the contemporary landscape.Landscape Urbanism is thus theorised as a newapproach that tends to »incorporate the processesand techniques that have historicallymodulated the landscape into the domain ofurbanism, empowering its ability to cope withthe wide range of scales, the diversity of domainsand the rapid changes at which it is currentlybeing challenged to operate«. All of theseconditions put current planning practices to thetest, imposing solutions that are continually lessrigid and forceful, in favour of others that aremore open to process and indeterminacy, preciselyas takes place in the transformation ofnatural landscapes (Najle, 2003).New frameworks of understanding and methodsof action may be born of the confluence of »environmentalengineering and landscape studiesand strategies of urban and industrial development«.The same notion of form can also be re-79Delavnica 1 / Workshop 1